Open Access Article
María Paula
Jarrín-Orozco†
a,
María
García-Nicolás†
a,
María
Romo-Vaquero
a,
Concepción
Carrascosa
b,
José
Berná
c,
Julio
Puigcerver
c,
Adrián
Saura-Sanmartín
c,
María Ángeles
Ávila-Gálvez
*a and
Juan Carlos
Espín
*a
aLaboratory of Food & Health, Research Group on Quality, Safety, and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, CEBAS-CSIC, 30100 Campus de Espinardo, Murcia, Spain. E-mail: mavila@cebas.csic.es; jcespin@cebas.csic.es
bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virgen de La Arrixaca University Hospital, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
cDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
First published on 2nd February 2026
Menopause increases cardiometabolic risk, partly by reducing the protective effects of estrogens and inducing gut microbiota dysbiosis, which can promote the production of atherogenic metabolites such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). Polyphenols may reduce TMAO levels, though interindividual variability limits reproducibility. We compared urinary and serum TMAO levels, and urinary trimethylamine (TMA) and dimethylamine (DMA) levels between healthy women of reproductive age (Pre-M, n = 120) and non-medicated postmenopausal women (Post-M, n = 90) using UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS. In Post-M women, we conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study to evaluate the effects of a polyphenol-rich extract mixture containing pomegranate, Polygonum cuspidatum, and red clover (sources of ellagitannins, resveratrol, and isoflavones) on TMAO, TMA, and DMA in the whole group and after metabotyping. Because medication is common in Post-M women due to age and cardiometabolic risk, trials in non-medicated participants are challenging, yet avoiding drug-diet interactions allows clearer attribution of dietary effects. Urinary TMAO and DMA levels were higher in Post-M than in Pre-M. No changes were observed in serum TMAO. However, the intervention reduced urinary TMAO and DMA versus baseline and placebo. The effects varied by metabotype. TMAO reduction was significant in urolithin A metabotype (UMA), equol producers (EP), and lunularin non-producers (LNP). Reductions and effect sizes were most pronounced in the metabotype clusters MC3 (UMA + EP + LP) and MC7 (UMA + EP + LNP), which represented 39% of participants. DMA decreased selectively in UMA. No correlations were found between TMAO or DMA changes and BMI, age at menopause onset, or years since menopause. These findings show that polyphenol supplementation reduces urinary TMAO in a metabotype-dependent manner and support metabotyping as a precision-health strategy to mitigate cardiometabolic risk after menopause.
Polyphenols are recognised as modulators of human physiology and potential agents for the prevention of chronic diseases. Experimental and clinical evidence links polyphenol consumption with improvements in oxidative stress, inflammation, lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial function.4–6 However, despite a large body of literature suggesting beneficial effects, most human trials have yielded inconsistent or modest outcomes. This lack of reproducibility has led regulatory authorities, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), to reject the majority of health claims related to polyphenols, mainly due to pronounced interindividual variability in their metabolism and biological responses.7
This variability is especially evident in studies involving postmenopausal women. Several meta-analyses support the benefits of isoflavones in alleviating menopausal symptoms and improving cardiometabolic health,8 but other analyses report inconsistent findings or significant heterogeneity among participants.9 The health effects of other polyphenols, such as resveratrol, have been less frequently studied in postmenopausal women, and the available evidence remains inconclusive.10 These discrepancies likely stem from differences in gut microbial metabolism, since polyphenols are extensively transformed in the colon before absorption.11,12 Thus, these microbial transformations critically shape the bioactivity and systemic actions of polyphenols.
Gut microbial metabolites, such as urolithins, equol, lunularin, and various phenolic acids, exhibit higher bioavailability and distinct biological activities than their precursors. Subsequent phase II metabolism regulates their circulation and excretion, while enterohepatic recycling prolongs systemic exposure. Many of the physiological effects attributed to polyphenols are now believed to arise primarily from these gut microbiota-derived metabolites.7 Equol and urolithin A are among the best characterised examples, both exerting antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, mitophagic, and cardioprotective actions.5
Variation in the capacity to produce these metabolites among individuals has led to the identification of specific gut microbiota metabotypes associated with polyphenol metabolism. Individuals can be classified according to their ability to generate equol from daidzein, urolithins from ellagic acid, or lunularin from resveratrol.5 Combinations of these metabotypes, known as metabotype clusters (MCs), may coexist in the same individual, generating up to 12 possible profiles with distinct biological potentials.13 Recent findings in postmenopausal women showed that clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life after supplementation with a mixture of polyphenol-rich plant extracts (pomegranate, resveratrol, and red clover) were mainly observed in equol producers (EP) and in certain MCs.14 These results indicate that the efficacy of polyphenol interventions can depend on the individual's capacity to generate specific bioactive metabolites, providing a mechanistic basis for the inconsistent outcomes often observed in intervention trials and supporting the use of metabotyping as a tool in precision health approaches.
Among the many metabolites produced by the gut microbiota, trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) has received particular attention because of its role in CVD.15,16 TMAO is generated in the liver from trimethylamine (TMA), a compound produced by gut bacteria from dietary precursors such as choline, carnitine, and betaine, which are abundant in red meat, fish, eggs, and some vegetables. Despite some discrepancies between observational and intervention studies, elevated TMAO levels have been associated with vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, foam cell formation, and platelet hyperreactivity, processes that contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and adverse cardiovascular events.17 Lifestyle and dietary factors that modulate the gut microbiota, such as increased intake of fibre-rich or plant-based foods, can lower circulating TMAO levels and improve cardiovascular outcomes.18,19
Accumulating evidence suggests that polyphenols may attenuate TMAO-related CVD risk by reshaping gut microbial composition and reducing the abundance of taxa involved in TMA production and/or modulating hepatic flavin monooxygenase 3 (FMO3) activity.15 This interaction provides an additional explanation for the cardiovascular benefits of polyphenol-rich diets and highlights the potential of targeting host-microbiota co-metabolism as a strategy to improve health in postmenopausal women.
Based on the above, we hypothesise that the effects of certain polyphenols on TMAO levels may be modulated by the gut microbiota's metabolism of these compounds, leading to distinct metabolites with varying impacts on TMAO levels. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether a mixture of plant extracts rich in ellagitannins, resveratrol, and isoflavones can influence serum and/or urinary TMAO levels compared with a placebo in non-medicated postmenopausal women, depending on their gut microbiota metabotype.
The experimental design and general procedures have been described in detail elsewhere.14 The trial comprised two studies: Study 1 included healthy premenopausal women (Pre-M), defined as women in their reproductive years (aged 30–48 years), who were recruited for comparative purposes; and Study 2 involved postmenopausal women (Post-M, aged 45–59 years), enrolled in an 8-week intervention to assess the effects of PPs on urinary and serum levels of TMAO, TMA, and DMA.
In Study 1, Pre-M participants consumed 3 capsules of PPs daily for 3 days to standardise metabotype determination using first-morning urine samples. Urine samples were collected before and after intake.
In Study 2, healthy, non-medicated Post-M women were randomised to receive either PPs or the placebo for 8 weeks, followed by a 1-month washout and crossover to the alternate treatment (Fig. 1). Participants followed a controlled diet, supervised by a nutritionist throughout the trial, with several menu options. Although not excessively strict given the five-month duration of the study, the diet was low in polyphenols and regulated intake of choline and carnitine sources (red meat, eggs, fish, and some legumes such as lentils and chickpeas).14 Blood and urine samples, and adherence records were collected at each time point. Refer to SI for additional information.
The sample size for this two-period, two-sequence crossover study was determined following established guidelines for crossover designs in nutrition research and methodological considerations for continuous outcomes in clinical nutrition; i.e., a parallel design requires about five times as many participants as a crossover to achieve similar power and α.22 We performed an a priori sample size justification for a 2 × 2 crossover design with urinary and serum TMAO as the primary endpoint. Assuming a moderate within-subject standardised effect size (paired Cohen's d ≈ 0.5), α = 0.05, and 80% power, crossover trials require fewer participants than parallel designs because power is driven by the within-subject variance of treatment differences. Using a conservative efficiency factor (R ≈ 5), a parallel design achieving significance with n ≈ 30–40 per comparison23,24 would require approximately 10 participants in a crossover design to achieve comparable power. However, given our planned metabotyping and clustering (MCs), which fragment the cohort and reduce per-group sample sizes with uncertain prevalences, we prospectively increased recruitment to n = 90 to ensure adequate power for the overall analysis and for the most prevalent MCs. We further incorporated an anticipated 15% drop-out and accounted for phase and sequence in the mixed/repeated measures analysis, with a washout period to minimise carryover. This conservative, subgroup-oriented planning ensured robust inference for both the primary endpoint and metabotype-specific comparisons. Baseline assessments were performed before any supplementation to ensure unsupplemented reference values.
000g for 10 min at room temperature. A volume of 500 µL of the supernatant was collected and filtered through 13 mm polystyrene syringe filters (PES) with a 0.22 µm pore size (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The filtered urine was subsequently diluted 1
:
100 to a final volume of 500 µL. In some samples, a 1
:
200 dilution was required to ensure linearity within the calibration range. Concentrations of DMA, TMA, TMAO, and creatinine (used to normalise urinary metabolite concentrations) were determined.
Serum samples were processed following the extraction procedure described elsewhere,25 with minor adaptations. Briefly, 20 µL of serum was mixed with 80 µL of MeOH. Proteins were precipitated by vortexing for 1 min, and samples were then centrifuged at 14
000g for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was carefully recovered and further filtered using 0.22 µm PES syringe filters. A 30 µL aliquot was transferred into a vial insert for injection. After analysing the three metabolites in a representative subset of samples, only TMAO was measured in all the samples.
Matrix effects were evaluated by comparing the TMAO response in post-extraction spiked serum samples with that obtained from standards prepared in MeOH at equivalent concentrations. As the analyte is endogenously present in serum, background signals from blank serum samples were subtracted from all spiked samples prior to matrix effect calculation. Matrix effects were calculated as the percentage ratio of background-corrected responses in serum and MeOH. In accordance with commonly accepted bioanalytical criteria, matrix effects within ±15% were considered negligible. Under these conditions, the observed matrix effect was below 5%, indicating minimal ion suppression or enhancement and confirming that matrix effects did not compromise quantitative performance; therefore, no correction was required.
Thyroid, hepatic, and renal functions were determined at the hospital's facilities. All metabolites were analysed by UPLC–QqQ using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), as described below.
The mass spectrometer was operated in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. TMAO, TMA, DMA, and creatinine were detected in positive ion mode. Optimised precursor and product ion transitions (Q1 → Q3) and the corresponding collision energies are summarised in Table S2. Data acquisition and integration of chromatographic peaks were carried out using MassHunter Quantitative Analysis software (Agilent Technologies). Calibration curves were constructed using serial dilutions of authentic standards for each analyte prepared in water, and linearity was assessed by the correlation coefficient (R2) exceeding 0.99.
Phenolic-derived metabolites were identified by direct comparison with available analytical standards whenever possible. Spectral characteristics such as molecular mass and fragmentation patterns were evaluated to confirm compound assignments. Quantification was performed using extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) with a narrow mass window to minimise peak overlap. Metabolites used for metabotype classification, including the corresponding phase-II metabolites of equol, urolithin A, isourolithin A, urolithin B, and lunularin, were measured using a validated targeted metabolomics method under consistent analytical conditions.14 These measurements ensured accurate detection of phase II conjugates of equol, urolithin, and lunularin, as well as the assignment of participants to their respective metabotype clusters (MCs).
For metabolites without commercial standards, such as isourolithin A sulfate, the identification was based on accurate mass and isotopic distribution; inclusion required a signal-to-noise ratio >10.
Analyses were carried out considering the entire group as a single population and, additionally, stratifying by individual metabotypes and their corresponding clusters (MCs). Changes in TMAO, TMA, and DMA were estimated using least-squares means (LSM) derived from the two-way repeated-measures ANOVA model that accounted for intra-subject variability and the crossover design of the trial. In cases where the assumption of sphericity was not met, degrees of freedom were corrected using the Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment, yielding non-integer residual values. This procedure ensured reliable inference of treatment effects with appropriate error control.
Cohen's d was calculated for each within-subject comparison (pre- vs. post-intervention) to estimate the effect size of PPs intake on TMAO, TMA, and DMA. Effect sizes were interpreted according to conventional thresholds (small: 0.2 ≤ d < 0.5; medium: 0.5 ≤ d < 0.8; and large: d ≥ 0.8), thereby facilitating the evaluation of clinical relevance across metabotype-defined subgroups.26
Baseline values of TMAO, TMA, and DMA were compared between the two arms at the start of each intervention phase (T1 and T3; Fig. 1) to rule out carryover effects between treatment periods.
Variations in TMAO (post-treatment vs. baseline) were correlated with BMI, chronological age, age at menopause onset, years since menopause, PREDIMED questionnaire, and IPAQ scores to assess potential confounding effects. Depending on data distribution, relationships were tested using multiple linear regression or by calculating Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients. Comparisons between two independent groups (e.g., Pre-M vs. Post-M women at baseline) were performed using independent Student's t-tests for normally distributed data, or Mann–Whitney U tests otherwise. For comparisons between two dependent conditions (e.g., pre- vs. post-intervention with PPs or placebo within each arm, before and after washout, and crossover), paired t-tests were applied for parametric data and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for nonparametric distributions.
Participants were classified into low, medium, and high producers using unsupervised K-means clustering (k = 3) based on creatinine-normalised metabolite intensities as described elsewhere.20 For each metabotype, the sum of the specific metabolites was considered to define the production groups. Data were log-transformed and autoscaled before analysis in MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca). Clustering was performed using the Hartigan–Wong algorithm with Euclidean distance. The thresholds defining the three clusters correspond to the centroid values automatically determined by the algorithm. Data plots were performed using GraphPad Prism 10.4.1 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and SigmaPlot v16.0. Statistical significance was set at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
| Characteristics | Description | Pre-M (n = 120) | Post-M (n = 90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Table 1 has been adapted from Jarrín-Orozco et al.14 The numbering of MCs corresponds to the order established in a previous report, based on prevalence rates.13 PREDIMED adherence categories were calculated from the 14-item Mediterranean diet questionnaire (score range 0–14), classified as low (≤5), moderate (6–9), and high (≥10) adherence.27 IPAQ categories were derived from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form,28 and were normalised to a 0–100 scale for readability and classified as low (0–33), moderate (34–66), and high (67–100) physical activity levels. | |||
| Age (years) | Mean ± SD; median (range) | 40.2 ± 4.0; 41.0 (30–48) | 53.2 ± 3.3; 54.0 (45–59) |
| BMI (kg m−2) | Mean ± SD; median (range) | 23.7 ± 3.8; 23.0 (18.3–36.2) | 26.0 ± 4.3; 25.1 (19.0–37.4) |
| BMI categories (%) | Normal/overweight/obese | 70.8/22.5/6.7 | 50.0/35.6/14.4 |
| Adherence to the Mediterranean diet (PREDIMED) (%) | Low/medium/high | — | 15.7/74.2/10.1 |
| IPAQ score (%) | Low/medium/high | — | 61.1/32.2/6.7 |
| Menopause onset (years) | Mean ± SD (range) | — | 49.8 ± 3.7 (40–56) |
| Postmenopausal duration (years) | Mean ± SD (range) | — | 3.9 ± 3.5 (0.3–14) |
| Equol metabotype (%) | EP/ENP | 49.6/50.4 | 50.6/49.4 |
| Urolithin metabotypes (%) | UMA/UMB/UM0 | 64.7/32.8/2.5 | 71.9/28.1/0 |
| Lunularin metabotype (%) | LP/LNP | 60.5/39.5 | 50.6/49.4 |
| Metabotype clusters (MC1–MC12) | Percentage per cluster | MC1: 10.9%; MC2: 14.3%; MC3: 21.8%; MC4: 12.6%; MC5: 18.5%; MC6: 6.0%; MC7: 10.1%; MC8: 3.4%; MC9: 0.8%; MC10: 0.8%; MC11: 0.8%; MC12: 0% | MC1: 10.1%; MC2: 15.7%; MC3: 15.7%; MC4: 9.0%; MC5: 18.0%; MC6: 5.6%; MC7: 22.5%; MC8: 3.4%; MC9–MC12: 0% |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 Comparison of urinary TMAO levels between pre-menopausal (Pre-M; n = 120) and post-menopausal women at baseline (Post-M (B); n = 90) ***p < 0.001. | ||
Excreted TMAO levels did not correlate with BMI or age in either Pre-M or Post-M groups (results not shown). In Post-M women, TMAO concentrations were likewise unrelated to age at menopause onset, years since menopause, IPAQ score (which had a low mean, Table 1), or adherence to the Mediterranean diet (PREDIMED), which was moderate in the majority (75%, Table 1) of participants.
Moreover, differences in TMAO between Pre-M and Post-M did not vary when stratified by metabotypes or MCs, indicating that menopausal status influences TMAO concentration independently of other variables.
TMA levels did not differ between Pre-M and Post-M groups (results not shown). In contrast, DMA levels were significantly higher in Post-M than in Pre-M (Fig. S15). Similar to TMAO, TMA and DMA values did not depend on BMI, age at menopause onset, years since menopause, or IPAQ and PREDIMED scores.
After 8 weeks of PPs intake, modest shifts in individual metabotypes were observed. The proportion of UMB increased, while UMA decreased slightly. Both EP and LP metabotypes showed moderate increases, and the overall distribution remained comparable to baseline and to that of Pre-M women.14 MC frequencies also changed moderately. MC3 became more prevalent (20%) and surpassed MC7 (19.2%), which had dominated at baseline. Clusters MC1 and MC4 increased (12.8% and 14.1%, respectively), and MC2 declined (9%). Although the distribution in Post-M women continued to differ modestly from that in Pre-M participants, PPs intake led to partial convergence in MC profiles without substantial reconfiguration.14
In Post-M women, without stratification by metabotypes or MCs, PPs intervention significantly reduced urinary TMAO levels compared with baseline and placebo, with effects of small to moderate magnitude (Table 2 and Fig. 3B). After stratification by metabotypes, the greatest decreases in TMAO, significantly different from both baseline and placebo, were observed in UMA, followed by EP and LNP, also with small to moderate effects, probably influenced by the reduction of the sample size (Table 2 and Fig. 3C). No significant differences in TMAO levels were detected in UMB, ENP, or LP (Fig. S16). The effects of PPs intervention were even more pronounced in MC3 (UMA + EP + LP) and MC7 (UMA + EP + LNP), where PPs intake significantly reduced TMAO with large or very large effects (Table 2 and Fig. 4). Nevertheless, the low n warrants caution, although it exceeded the minimum estimated for the crossover trial design. No significant differences in TMAO levels were found in the remaining MCs (Fig. S17).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Urinary TMAO changes after polyphenol supplementation (PPs) in postmenopausal (Post-M) women stratified by MCs (MC3 and MC7). Only cases with statistically significant differences are shown. Post-M (B), baseline; Post-M (PPs), after PPs intervention; Post-M (B-Pla), placebo baseline; and Post-M (Pla), after placebo consumption. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Details are provided in Table 2. | ||
| Groups | TMAO difference (LSM, μg mg−1 creatinine) | 95% CI LSM | p-Value | Cohen's d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a Only individual metabotypes and MCs with statistically significant differences are shown. Statistically significant differences are boldfaced. Values are expressed as least squares mean (LSM) differences in urinary TMAO, derived from a two-factor (time × treatment) repeated measures ANOVA adjusted for interindividual variability, washout period, and crossover. UMA, Uro-A producers; EP, equol producers; LNP, lunularin non-producers (i.e., resveratrol is reduced to dihydroresveratrol, with no lunularin formation); LP, lunularin producers (i.e., dihydroresveratrol undergoes dehydroxylation to yield lunularin and 4HDB). PPs and Pla indicate within-group changes from baseline to post-intervention. PPs – Pla indicates the LSM difference between PPs and placebo post-intervention. Negative values denote decreases. Positive values denote increases. Cohen's d values quantify the magnitude and direction of group differences, with negative and positive values indicating reductions and increases, respectively. Effect sizes were interpreted using conventional thresholds: small: 0.2 ≤ d < 0.5; medium: 0.5 ≤ d < 0.8; and large: d ≥ 0.8.26 | ||||
| All participants (n = 78) | ||||
| PPs | −70.58 | [−118.5, −22.7] | 0.018 | −0.25 |
| Pla | 18.08 | [−28.5, 64.7] | 0.543 | 0.13 |
| PPs–Pla | −85.97 | [−136.0, −43.0] | 0.013 | −0.39 |
| Metabotypes | ||||
| UMA (n = 49) | ||||
| PPs | −84.30 | [−137.4, −31.2] | 0.005 | −0.38 |
| Pla | 15.73 | [−42.8, 74.2] | 0.543 | 0.07 |
| PPs–Pla | −100.01 | [−156.1, −44.3] | 0.001 | −0.45 |
| EP (n = 46) | ||||
| PPs | −69.40 | [−136.3, −3.5] | 0.033 | −0.21 |
| Pla | −49.77 | [−126.7, 27.1] | 0.543 | −0.19 |
| PPs–Pla | −16.63 | [−120.2, −7.2] | 0.032 | −0.11 |
| LNP (n = 44) | ||||
| PPs | −55.10 | [−108.5, −1.8] | 0.009 | −0.26 |
| Pla | −24.42 | [−72.5, 23.7] | 0.507 | −0.14 |
| PPs–Pla | −30.72 | [−89.1, 27.6] | 0.011 | −0.14 |
| Metabotype clusters (MCs) | ||||
| MC3 (UMA + EP + LP) (n = 16) | ||||
| PPs | −139.10 | [−249.1, −41] | 0.013 | −0.71 |
| Pla | −39.00 | [−13.2, 35.2] | 0.464 | −0.25 |
| PPs–Pla | −100.10 | [−178.2, −22.0] | 0.044 | −0.52 |
| MC7 (UMA + EP + LNP) (n = 16) | ||||
| PPs | −111.41 | [−188.4, −34.4] | 0.005 | −0.71 |
| Pla | 40.39 | [−45.6, 126.4] | 0.328 | 0.23 |
| PPs–Pla | −162.56 | [−252.9, −72.3] | 0.023 | −1.58 |
Regarding TMA, no differences were observed in the entire group or after stratification by metabotypes (results not shown). In contrast, urinary DMA values decreased significantly after PPs intervention, but only in the UMA metabotype (Fig. S18).
The change in urinary TMAO induced by PPs intake did not correlate with BMI, age at menopause onset, or years since menopause. Likewise, no carryover effect was observed. Remarkably, no significant effect was detected after placebo intake in any case (Table 2, Fig. 3 and 4).
Most studies examining the association between TMAO and cardiovascular risk have used serum or plasma measurements, particularly in clinical populations with elevated risk. Our study focuses on healthy women in a controlled dietary intervention, in which urinary TMAO is commonly used to monitor changes in microbial-derived production over the intervention period.
TMAO is recognised as an independent cardiovascular risk factor, promoting atherosclerosis through foam cell formation, impaired cholesterol efflux, endothelial inflammation, and enhanced platelet reactivity.17 However, causal evidence is primarily supported by preclinical studies, and in humans, intervention trials are limited and often yield mostly associative findings. The relationship between diet and circulating TMAO has been debated for nearly a decade. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet has been inversely associated with urinary TMAO levels, underscoring the role of dietary patterns in shaping the gut microbiota and metabolome.29 In contrast, other reports have shown that TMAO increased after a fibre-enriched Mediterranean diet30 and after the consumption of diets rich in fish-derived n-3 fatty acids and whole-grain cereals (foods generally considered cardioprotective). These findings suggest that TMAO is not a universally valid biomarker of cardiovascular risk independent of dietary background.31
Against this backdrop, several trials have explored the role of polyphenols as possible modulators of TMAO. For example, Annunziata et al. (2019) observed a marked reduction in TMAO in young adults consuming a grape polyphenol extract, despite its very low resveratrol content (135.7 ± 0.64 μg g−1 extract), suggesting synergistic actions of the polyphenolic matrix.32 However, no effect of a much higher resveratrol dose (0.5–1 g) combined with exercise in older adults at high cardiovascular risk was recently reported, suggesting that resveratrol alone might be insufficient.33 Consuming flavanol-rich cocoa improved endothelial function and decreased serum TMAO concentrations in healthy ageing adults.23 Also, a polyphenol-rich tomato extract reduced fasting TMAO levels, with effects more evident in urine than in plasma, and was accompanied by microbial shifts, including decreases in the genera Bacteroides and Ruminococcus and increases in the genus Alistipes.34 Recently, pomegranate polyphenols were shown to inhibit the microbial conversion of choline and carnitine to TMA in vitro.35 Within this evolving evidence, our trial in non-medicated Post-M women adds a new dimension, i.e., polyphenol supplementation significantly reduced TMAO levels compared with placebo, with effects strongly dependent on gut microbiota metabotypes.
A central feature of our study is the inclusion of non-medicated Post-M women. In most previous trials, Post-M participants were either medicated or this information was not specified, and therapies such as hormone replacement or other drugs can alter gut microbiota composition or hepatic metabolism of amines, including FMO3 activity. These confounders make it difficult to attribute net effects to dietary constituents. Although restricting recruitment to non-medicated women is challenging, given the high prevalence of treatments in this population segment, it allows a less confounded assessment of the impact of polyphenols.
Comparison with women of reproductive age (Pre-M) provides additional context. Post-M women showed higher urinary levels of TMAO and DMA than premenopausal women, suggesting that menopause favours a more atherogenic methylamine profile, independent of diet or physical activity. In Pre-M women, lower TMAO levels may reflect both hormonal protection and a more balanced gut microbiota. The reduction of TMAO following polyphenol supplementation in Post-M women supports the hypothesis that diet can partially counteract this unfavourable profile.15 However, the inter-individual variability, as captured by metabotype in our study, appears to modulate the magnitude of the effects. In the present study, gut microbiota analysis was not included, as it is currently ongoing. We focused instead on endpoint changes, particularly TMAO, consistent with other studies and recent trials.23,35 Gut microbiota analysis will complement these findings in the near future, although the most widely accepted mechanism for TMAO reduction is through the gut microbiota.36 Other mechanisms have also been proposed, including downregulation of hepatic FMO3 expression (limiting TMA to TMAO conversion), reduced intestinal absorption of dietary precursors (e.g., choline and carnitine), systemic anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions (e.g., NFκB pathway attenuation), and improved renal clearance. However, non-microbiota mechanisms remain primarily supported by preclinical evidence.37,38
Although FMO3 expression and/or activity could not be assessed in the participants since it is a hepatic enzyme, its involvement remains a plausible hypothesis. Our metabotypes and MCs analysis indicate that the effect of polyphenols is not uniform. UMA, EP, and LNP women showed greater reductions in TMAO. Importantly, the magnitude of urolithin A, equol, and dihydroresveratrol production did not directly correlate with the decrease in TMAO. This reflects that causality is elusive when linking single-time-point measurements to processes modulated over weeks. It also suggests that benefits may not derive exclusively from the metabolites themselves, but from gut microbial ecosystems capable of producing them, which may simultaneously suppress TMA-generating bacteria, favour competing microbial routes, or activate alternative pathways in the host.39
Our findings on DMA (dimethylamine) are particularly novel. Very few studies have investigated DMA in postmenopausal women, even fewer have addressed its dietary modulation, and none to date have examined its modulation by polyphenols. The higher baseline DMA levels compared with those of Pre-M women, and their selective reduction in UMA, suggest that DMA may serve as a marker of alternative microbial routes in methylamine metabolism. Although its physiological role is not clearly defined, DMA is mostly endogenously produced and is the most abundant short-chain aliphatic amine in human and animal urine,40,41 with elevated levels in renal dysfunction.42 Although certain functions begin to be compromised during menopause, renal, thyroid, and hepatic function values remained within normal reference ranges and were not affected by PPs consumption (results not shown). Therefore, the slightly higher DMA levels observed in Post-M compared with Pre-M cannot be directly attributed to renal dysfunction in our study. DMA is not a direct precursor of TMAO. Instead, TMA can be demethylated by hepatic demethylases and gut microbial pathways to generate DMA.43 Thus, monitoring DMA may provide insights into the complexity of methylamine flux and its dietary responsiveness, an emerging field.
Taken together, our results reinforce the concept of precision health. Stratification of Post-M women by metabotype and MCs allows identification of those most likely to benefit from polyphenol supplementation. This approach addresses variability that has limited reproducibility of previous trials and provides a mechanistic basis for personalised interventions in Post-M women, a group at elevated CVD risk where medication often introduces confounding.
We acknowledge some limitations. The relatively small sizes of some subgroups after clustering limit generalisation and the precision of estimates. Longer studies are needed to assess the persistence of polyphenol effects on TMAO and their possible clinical translation, including vascular inflammation, endothelial function, and platelet activity. Direct evaluation of FMO3 expression and activity in humans remains a challenge. Further research is required to identify possible bioactive intermediates and to resolve the apparent paradox between metabolite production and TMAO reduction.
These results support the idea that identifying responsive metabotypes highlights the need to integrate metabolic stratification into precision intervention strategies. Thus, using metabotyping in Post-M women could predict the benefit of polyphenol supplementation, converting interindividual variability into an opportunity for personalised interventions.
(Poly)phenols emerge as dietary modulators and catalysts of precision health, capable of rebalancing methylamine metabolism at a critical stage in women's lives. Overall, these findings provide a mechanistic basis for understanding the heterogeneous outcomes observed in previous trials and reinforce metabotyping as a strategy to mitigate cardiometabolic risk after menopause.
Supplementary information (SI) is available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5fo05461c.
Footnote |
| † These authors contributed equally. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |