Open Access Article
Sanne L. M. van Stratum
*ab,
Yala Stevens
ab and
Jogchum Plat
*a
aDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. E-mail: sanne.vanstratum@maastrichtuniversity.nl; j.plat@maastrichtuniversity.nl
bSolabia BV, Gaetano Martinolaan 50, 6229 GS Maastricht, The Netherlands
First published on 16th March 2026
Background: cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome are major contributors to global morbidity and mortality. Dyslipidaemia plays a central role in their pathogenesis. Olive-derived polyphenols, particularly oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol, have gained attention for their potential lipid-modulating and vascular-protective effects. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes clinical and mechanistic evidence on the effects of olive leaf and olive oil polyphenols on blood lipid profiles and cardiovascular risk markers in both healthy and at-risk populations. Methods: clinical studies using standardized olive leaf extracts (OLE) or olive oil preparations with defined phenolic content were included. Multi-ingredient formulations containing additional bioactive compounds were excluded to isolate the effects of olive-derived polyphenols. Evidence was categorized by population (healthy, cardiovascular risk, overweight/obese, hyperlipidaemic) and complemented by mechanistic insights from animal and cell-based studies. Results: in healthy individuals, olive-derived polyphenols mainly improved oxidative and vascular markers, with little effect on absolute lipid levels. In individuals with elevated cardiovascular risk, reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and oxidised low-density lipoprotein were more consistently observed. Overweight and obese participants showed no lipid changes at the studied doses, while postmenopausal and mildly hyperlipidaemic adults displayed modest short-term improvements and larger lipid reductions with longer supplementation. Mechanistic studies indicate that olive polyphenols influence lipid metabolism and vascular function through AMPK activation, suppression of SREBP-1c, modulation of PPAR pathways, enhancement of antioxidant defences via Nrf2 signalling, and attenuation of inflammatory pathways including NF-κB and MAPK. Conclusion: overall, current evidence indicates that olive leaf and olive oil polyphenols can beneficially modulate lipid parameters, oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular function. The strongest and most consistent lipid-related effects are observed in individuals with elevated cardiovascular risk and in long-duration interventions in hyperlipidaemic postmenopausal women. While mechanistic studies support multiple pathways relevant to lipid regulation, long-term standardized clinical trials with well-characterized polyphenol compositions are needed to confirm efficacy and identify optimal dosing strategies across different metabolic phenotypes.
Lifestyle interventions, particularly dietary strategies, offer a practical approach to support regulation of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and reduce cardiovascular risk across diverse populations.6 Among these, the Mediterranean diet stands out for its cardioprotective effects. Rich in plant-based foods, healthy fats, and moderate intake of animal products, this diet has been shown to improve blood lipid profiles, reduce inflammatory markers, and lower waist-to-hip ratios, ultimately decreasing the risk of coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and overall CVD.7–10
Key components of the Mediterranean diet include extra virgin olive oil and olives, which are rich in bioactive polyphenols known for their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Among these, oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol (HT) are two of the most studied polyphenols. While oleuropein is abundant in olive leaves,11 HT is typically found in higher concentrations in olive-derived byproducts such as pomace and vegetation water.12 In extra virgin olive oil, both compounds occur only at low levels; oleuropein typically ranges from <0.01–1.7 mg kg−1,13 while HT has been reported between 0–25.4 mg kg−1,11,14–16 due to hydrolysis and transformations occurring during olive processing.17 Interestingly, HT can also be obtained through the enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis of oleuropein,18 making olive leaves an indirect but valuable source. As a result, olive leaf extract (OLE) has gained attention not only for its native polyphenol content but also for its potential to serve as a precursor for HT production, with promising implications for cardiovascular and metabolic health.
OLE has been investigated across various health-related domains, including antioxidant activity,19–21 and neuroprotection.22 Cardiometabolic function has also been a focus of both clinical and mechanistic studies, which specifically examine OLE as a concentrated source of olive leaf polyphenols in relation to lipid metabolism, vascular function, and processes such as oxidative stress and inflammation. This research has also explored whether concentrated polyphenol sources might be relevant in populations with low habitual intake of olives or extra virgin olive oil. However, dietary improvement remains the primary strategy to increase polyphenol exposure. Importantly, maintaining healthy blood lipid levels is not only crucial for individuals with existing CVD or metabolic syndrome, but also for the general population as a preventive strategy to reduce long-term cardiovascular risk.
This narrative review aims to synthesize current knowledge on the role of olive-derived polyphenols, oleuropein and HT, particularly from OLE and extra virgin olive oil, in blood lipid regulation and vascular health. The review discusses clinical evidence supporting the lipid-modulating effects of interventions using olive polyphenols, followed by mechanistic insights from animal and cell-based studies. Relevant studies were identified through non-systematic searches in PubMed and Scopus using terms related to olive polyphenols, oleuropein, HT, OLE, lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular health. Studies using extracts with a standardized polyphenol, HT, or oleuropein content, or polyphenol enriched olive oil preparations were included. Interventions involving multi-ingredient formulations containing additional bioactive compounds (e.g., astaxanthin, berberine, curcumin) were excluded to avoid confounding effects and to isolate the impact of olive-derived polyphenols.
In recent years, scientific interest in olive leaves has increased due to their high content of bioactive polyphenols. These compounds, particularly oleuropein and HT, are being studied for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cardiometabolic properties. As a result, OLE is now commonly used in dietary supplements and functional foods aimed at supporting cardiovascular and metabolic health.
:
water (80
:
20, v/v), or advanced techniques including ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). These techniques improve polyphenol yield in olive leaves, reduce processing time, and better preserve thermolabile compounds.24 Maceration of olive leaves in methanol
:
water yields very low oleuropein concentrations (<0.13 μg g−1–0.29 mg g−1),25 whereas MAE achieves 11.59 mg g−1 (ref. 26) and UAE reaches 13.39 mg g−1 (ref. 27) providing the highest oleuropein recovery among these methods. HT levels also differ across techniques; MAE of olive leaves yields ∼0.87 mg g−1, while UAE reaches ∼2.19 mg g−1, showing a 2-fold increase in HT concentration by using UAE.28 Lastly, total polyphenol content of olive leaves is also higher with advanced techniques; MAE and UAE deliver ∼79.8 mg g−1 compared to ∼71.1 mg g−1 for conventional heat-reflux extraction, while reducing extraction time from 60 min to only 21 min (UAE) or 2 min (MAE).28
Although HT is commonly sourced from olive pomace and vegetation water,12 olive leaves are increasingly used as a sustainable alternative, with enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis of oleuropein enabling controlled HT production.18 This approach not only adds value to olive leaf biomass but also offers a controlled and standardized method for obtaining HT, making olive leaves a sustainable alternative source in the development of polyphenol-rich extracts. A broader overview of extraction techniques and their influence on phenolic yield is provided by comparative studies on olive leaf processing methods.24,29,30
Post-extraction steps include filtration, concentration, and spray-drying. To ensure consistency in composition and bioactivity, final products are often standardized for their HT or oleuropein content, which supports reproducibility in research and facilitates regulatory approval.
Oleuropein is unique to the Oleaceae family, especially Olea europaea, and is found in unripe olives and their leaves and, to a lesser extent, in extra virgin olive oil. In general, olive leaves contain a broader and more concentrated phenolic profile than olive fruit or oil. For instance, oleuropein concentrations in olive leaves can exceed 20 mg g−1 extract, and in standardized OLEs, levels typically range between 30 and 57 mg g−1, depending on the olive cultivar and extraction method.34 In contrast, extra virgin olive oil contains only trace amounts of oleuropein (0 to 4.7 × 10−3 mg g−1),35,36 due to degradation during oil processing.34 This makes OLE a particularly rich and consistent source of polyphenols.
Upon hydrolysis, oleuropein yields several biologically relevant derivatives, including oleuropein aglycone, HT and elenolic acid (Fig. 1). The oleuropein-aglycone exhibits distinct biological properties, including reported neuroprotective37 and anti-atherogenic effects.38,39
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Oleuropein metabolism [reproduced from Frumuzachi et al., Antioxidants (Basel), 2024, under CC BY 4.0 license]. | ||
Although “glycosylated oleuropein” and “oleuropein-aglycone” are sometimes used interchangeably in the literature, they represent chemically and functionally different molecules. Glycosylated oleuropein is highly polar and the dominant form in all olive-leaf extracts and purified oleuropein powders used in preclinical and clinical research. In contrast, oleuropein-aglycone and its derivatives (oleacein, oleocanthal) arise predominantly during olive-oil processing through endogenous β-glucosidase activity and they are more lipophilic.40
It is important to note that many mechanistic in vitro studies reported in the broader olive-phenolic literature indeed use oleuropein-aglycone or aglycone-derived secoiridoids. However, in the present review, which focuses specifically on olive-leaf-derived oleuropein, all included in vitro and in vivo studies used glycosylated oleuropein (hereafter referred to as oleuropein). Only (extra) virgin olive oil-based interventions contain aglycone-rich secoiridoid fractions. This distinction is essential for correct mechanistic interpretation, since glycoside-derived oleuropein and oil-derived aglycones differ in polarity, metabolic fate, and biological activity.
HT is characterized by an ortho-dihydroxyphenyl group, which is thought to contribute to its notable antioxidant potential.43 It has attracted considerable scientific interest due to its stability and solubility.44
Once absorbed, HT undergoes extensive phase II metabolism to glucuronides, sulphates and methylated derivatives.45,49,50 These conjugates appear rapidly in circulation, generally within the first hour after intake,47 and reach peak concentrations shortly thereafter,45 reflecting highly efficient first-pass metabolism. Distribution studies in rodents show that HT and its metabolites reach the liver, red blood cells, kidneys, skeletal muscles, heart, and brain, indicating broad systemic distribution and the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier.51–54
In parallel with their rapid appearance in plasma, urinary excretion of HT-derived conjugates begins within the first few hours after ingestion and typically peaks later in the postprandial period (approximately 4–8 h), with most metabolites eliminated within 24 h.55–57 Human supplement and olive-oil interventions consistently show recovery of HT and its conjugates in urine, confirming efficient absorption, extensive phase II metabolism, and rapid renal clearance, with excretion levels strongly influenced by the food matrix.47,55–57 Polyphenol-enriched olive oils and liquid matrices consistently produce higher circulating metabolite concentrations than refined oils or capsules.47 Lastly, long-term supplementation also influences excretion profiles. After 21 days of supplementation with HT, oleuropein or oleuropein-aglycone extracts, rats excreted substantial quantities of phase I and II metabolites, including HT, HT-sulphate, and elenolic acid derivatives, within the first 24 h.54 The authors pointed out that long-term oleuropein supplementation resulted in higher total excretion of conjugated metabolites compared with chronic HT alone, reflecting the additional formation of HT from oleuropein hydrolysis.54 Collectively, these data demonstrate that the systemic fate of olive leaf phenols is driven less by the absorption of intact oleuropein and more by the rapid formation, distribution and clearance of HT-derived conjugates.
In humans, OLE has also been well tolerated. Daily doses of 250–1000 mg per day of OLE containing approximately 50–200 mg oleuropein have been administered for periods ranging from several weeks to 12 months without clinically relevant adverse events.45,49,61–64 Overall, available evidence indicates a wide safety margin for oleuropein- and HT-containing preparations when used within commonly studied dose ranges.
| Author, year | Study subjects | Study design | Intervention characteristics | Polyphenol content | Intervention duration | Significant effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ↑: significant increase; ↓: significant decrease, ↔ no significant effect. Abbreviations: Ab-oxLDL = antibody against oxidised LDL; CAT = catalase; GPx = glutathione peroxidase; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein; cholesterol; MCP1 = monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MDA = malondialdehyde; OLEU = oleuropein; oxLDL = oxidised low-density lipoprotein; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SOD/SOD1 = superoxide dismutase/superoxide dismutase 1 gene expression; TAC = total antioxidant capacity; TC = total cholesterol; TG = triglycerides; USF1 = upstream transcription factor 1; VAI = visceral adiposity index. | ||||||
Castañer et al. 2012 67 |
n = 18 healthy males, age = 20–60 years (mean ∼38 years) | RCT, crossover | 25 mL per day olive oil with low (2.7 mg kg−1) or high (366 mg kg−1) polyphenol content | Low: 0.06 mg per day, high: 7.7 mg per day | 3 weeks per intervention, 2-week washout | ↓ LDL-C: −0.16 mmol L−1, ↓ TC: −0.18 mmol L−1, ↓ oxLDL: −7.3 U L−1, ↓ MCP1: −29 pg mL−1, ↔ HDL-C, TG, glucose |
Covas et al., 2006 69 |
n = 12 healthy males, age = 20–22 years (mean ∼21 years) | RCT, crossover, 3-armed | 40 mL single dose olive oil with low; 2.7 mg kg−1, medium; 164 mg kg−1, or high; 366 mg kg−1 polyphenol content | Low: 0.09 mg per day medium: 6.0 mg per day high: 13.4 mg per day | Postprandial measurements up to 6 h; 10-day washout | ↓ oxLDL (postprandial): −22.5% vs. +23.2%, ↓ F2-isoprostanes: +11.6% vs. +29.9%, ↑ LDL phenolic content: +57%, ↑ Ab-oxLDL: +22.5% vs. −28.7%, ↔ TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C (postprandial) |
Marrugat et al., 2004 68 |
n = 30 healthy males (non-smoking in religious centre), age = 20–60 years (mean ∼57 years) | RCT, crossover, 3-armed | 25 mL per day of refined, common, or virgin olive oil | Refined: 0 mg per day, common: 1.6 mg per day, virgin: 3.4 mg per day | 3 weeks per intervention, 2-week washout | Virgin olive oil: ↑ HDL-C: +0.08 mmol L−1, ↑ LDL oxidation lag time: +8 min, ↓ oxLDL: −14.5 U L−1, ↔ TC, LDL-C, TG, glucose |
Oliveras-López et al., 2013 72 |
n = 62 healthy institutionalized elderly, age = 65–96 years (mean ∼82 years) | RCT, placebo-controlled | 50 mL per day polyphenol-rich extra virgin olive oil as only added fat vs. control (maintained dietary habits) | Total polyphenols: 26.79 mg per day, of which 0.09 mg HT | 6 weeks | ↓ TC: −0.40 mmol L−1, ↓ LDL-C: −0.22 mmol L−1, ↑ HDL-C: +0.18 mmol L−1, ↓ TG: −0.16 mmol L−1, ↑ TAC, ↑ CAT, ↓ SOD, ↓ GPx, ↔ glucose |
Perrone et al., 2019 73 |
n = 22 healthy adults, age = 18–65 years (mean ∼31 years) | RCT, crossover | 25 g polyphenol-rich extra virgin olive oil vs. common olive oil | 11.75 vs. 2.88 mg hydroxyphenyl ethanol and derivatives | Postprandial measurements up to 2 h; 1-week washout | ↓ oxLDL: −37.5%, ↓ MDA: −40.5%, ↓ TG: −11.1%, ↓ TC: −1.8%, ↓ VAI: −10.1%, ↑ SOD1 expression: fold change = 6.2, ↑ CAT expression: fold change = 2.2, ↑ USF1 expression: fold change = 2.4, ↔ HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose (postprandial) |
Pinckaers et al., 2025 71 |
n = 40 healthy males, age = 50–70 years (mean ∼60 years) | RCT, placebo-controlled | Bonolive®: 100 mg OLEU from 250 mg OLE daily vs. placebo (cellulose) | 100 mg per day OLEU | 36 days daily supplementation (∼5 weeks) | ↓ LDL-C: −0.2 mmol L−1, ↔ TC, HDL-C, TG, glucose, insulin, blood pressure |
Several clinical studies have evaluated the impact of olive leaf polyphenol supplementation on blood lipid profiles in healthy individuals. Despite heterogeneity in intervention type and dose, findings consistently show beneficial effects, particularly reductions in LDL oxidation and improvements in lipid parameters. In a crossover trial, Castañer et al. (2012) found that consuming high-polyphenol olive oil (7.7 mg per day) for three weeks reduced LDL oxidation (−7.3 ± 3.4 U L−1) and downregulated pro-atherogenic gene expression (CD40/CD40L pathway) compared to low-phenol oil (0.06 mg per day).67 Marrugat et al. (2004) demonstrated dose-dependent decreases in oxidised low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and increases in HDL-C concentrations following 3 weeks consumption of olive oil with 3.4 mg per day polyphenolic content.68 Covas et al. (2006) showed that olive oil consumption with 13.4 mg polyphenols led to postprandial (up to 6 h) decreases in oxLDL and increases in HDL-C concentrations.69 This indicates that even short-term intake of polyphenol-rich olive oil can confer measurable cardiometabolic benefits in healthy populations. These findings are consistent with the EFSA-approved health claim for HT, which states that it helps protect LDL particles from oxidative damage at intakes of ≥5 mg per day.70
In a more recent study, Pinckaers et al. (2025) investigated the effects of an OLE standardized for 100 mg oleuropein per day for 36 days in healthy older men.71 The intervention led to a statistically significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations (−0.3 mmol L−1), whereas no changes were observed in other lipid markers or metabolic outcomes. Oliveras-López et al. (2013) studied healthy elderly individuals who consumed polyphenol-rich extra virgin olive oil (containing 26.79 mg total polyphenols per day and 0.0865 mg HT per day) for six weeks.72 They reported significant improvements in total cholesterol (TC) (−0.36 mmol L−1), LDL-C (−0.28 mmol L−1), HDL-C (+0.17 mmol L−1), and triglyceride (TG) concentrations (−0.15 mmol L−1) compared to the control group, alongside enhanced antioxidant status (increase in catalase (CAT) and decrease in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx)). These findings highlight the potential of olive leaf polyphenols to favourably modulate serum lipid profiles, even in the absence of dyslipidaemia.
Acute postprandial effects were observed by Perrone et al. (2019), who administered 25 g of polyphenol-rich extra virgin olive oil (containing 9.4 mg HT and derivatives) to 22 healthy volunteers.73 Within 2 h, reductions in plasma oxLDL (−1.05 mU L−1), malondialdehyde (MDA) (−0.17 μmol L−1), and TG (−0.08 mmol L−1) concentrations were observed, along with upregulation of antioxidant-related gene expression at the mRNA level (SOD1, CAT, and upstream transcription factor 1 (USF1)).
The clinical evidence reviewed in this section indicates that olive leaf- and olive oil-derived polyphenols may positively influence lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in healthy individuals, with observed effects including reductions in serum LDL-C and oxLDL concentrations, increases in HDL-C concentrations, and improvements in antioxidant status. However, the interpretation of these findings is complicated by the variability in polyphenol composition across studies. Most interventions used olive oils or extracts containing a mixture of compounds, often without standardization or quantification of individual polyphenols. As a result, the specific contributions of oleuropein and HT remain difficult to disentangle. Although several statistically significant changes were reported in ox-LDL and modest shifts in lipid parameters, the absolute lipid changes are small (typically <0.1–0.18 mmol L−1) and therefore unlikely to be clinically meaningful. It should be noted that most interventions were short-term (postprandial up to 6 weeks). At these exposure durations, the interventions are expected to predominantly exert antioxidative rather than lipid-lowering effects.
| Author, year | Study subjects | Study design | Intervention characteristics | Polyphenol content | Intervention duration | Significant effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ↑: significant increase; ↓: significant decrease, ↔ no significant effect.a Perrinjaquet-Moccetti et al. (2008)63 is listed twice to reflect the two separate sub-studies: one comparing 500 mg vs. control, and one comparing 1000 mg vs. 500 mg. Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve, BP = blood pressure, CRP = C-reactive protein, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HT = hydroxytyrosol, IL-8 = interleukin-8, IRH = ischemic reactive hyperaemia, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, MDA = malondialdehyde, OLE = olive leaf extract, OLEU = oleuropein, oxLDL = oxidised low-density lipoprotein, PAI-1 = plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, PCSK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, RCT = randomized controlled trial, SBP = systolic blood pressure, TC = total cholesterol, TG = triglycerides. | ||||||
Ikonomidis et al., 2023 74 |
n = 30 patients with chronic coronary artery syndrome, age = 18–70 years (mean ∼62 years) | RCT, crossover, placebo controlled | Capsules with 412.5 mg olive oil enriched with 2.5 mg HT vs. placebo (non-enriched olive oil) | 10 mg per day HT | 1 month, washout period not described | ↓ TG: −0.47 mmol L−1, ↓ oxLDL: −18.9 ng mL−1, ↓ MDA: −0.4 mmol L−1, ↓ CRP: −2.7 mg L−1, ↓ PCSK9: −82.7 ng mL−1, ↔ TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, BP |
Lockyer et al., 2017 77 |
n = 60 pre-hypertensive males [SBP: 121–140 mmHg; DBP: 81–90 mmHg], age = 24–72 years (mean ∼45 years) | RCT, crossover, placebo controlled | Comvita: OLE ‘extra strength’ vs. polyphenol-free control | Total polyphenols: ∼167 mg per day of which 136 mg OLEU and 6.4 mg HT | 6 weeks, 4 weeks wash-out | ↓ 24 h SBP: −3.3 mmHg, ↓ 24 h DBP: −2.4 mmHg, ↓ TC: −0.32 mmol L−1, ↓ LDL-C: −0.19 mmol L−1, ↓ TG: −0.18 mmol L−1, ↓ IL-8, ↔ HDL-C, oxLDL, CRP |
Naranjo et al., 2024 75 |
n = 8 patients with ischemic stroke, age >18 years (mean ∼69 years) | Exploratory pilot study | Mediteanox®: supplement standardized for 15 mg HT per day vs. placebo (not specified) | 15 mg per day HT | 45 days starting 24 h after stroke, ∼6 weeks | ↓ LDL-C: −1.08 mmol L−1, ↓ TC: −1.27 mmol L−1, ↓ SBP: −26 mmHg, ↓ DBP: −21.2 mmHg, ↔ TG and HDL-C |
Perrinjaquet-Moccetti et al., 2008 a 63 |
n = 20 borderline hypertensive (SBP >120 or DBP >80 mmHg) monozygotic twins, age = 18–60 years (mean ∼37 years) | Open, controlled, parallel-group, co-twin study | EFLA® 943: OLE 500 mg vs. lifestyle advice | Total polyphenols: 200 mg per day, of which 104 mg OLEU | 8 weeks | ↓ SBP −5 mmHg, ↓ DBP −5 mmHg, ↓ LDL-C −0.5 mmol L−1, ↓ TC −0.9 mmol L−1, ↔ HDL-C |
Perrinjaquet-Moccetti et al., 2008 a 63 |
n = 20 borderline hypertensive (>120 mmHg SBP or >80 mmHg DBP at rest) monozygotic twins, age = 18–60 years (mean ∼35 years) | Open, controlled, parallel-group, co-twin study | EFLA® 943: OLE 500 mg vs. 1000 mg | Total polyphenols: 400 mg per day of which 208 mg OLEU | 8 weeks | ↓ SBP −11 mmHg, ↓ DBP −4 mmHg; ↓ LDL-C −0.38 mmol L−1, ↓ TC −1.1 mmol L−1, ↔ HDL-C |
Susalit et al., 2011 64 |
n = 148 stage-1 hypertensive adults, age = 25–60 years (mean ∼50 years) | RCT, active-controlled, parallel | EFLA® 943: OLE 1000 mg vs. active control captopril 12.5–25 mg twice daily | Total polyphenols: 400 mg per day of which ∼200 mg OLEU | 8 weeks | ↓ SBP: −11.5 mmHg, ↓ DBP: −4.8 mmHg, ↓ TC: −0.15 mmol L−1, ↓ TG: −0.13 mmol L−1, ↓ LDL-C: −0.1 mmol L−1, ↔ HDL-C |
Valls et al., 2015 76 |
n = 13 pre- and stage-1 hypertensive adults, age = 20–75 years (mean ∼51 years) | RCT, crossover, postprandial | Functional (961 mg kg−1 polyphenols) vs. standard (289 mg kg−1) virgin olive oil | ∼29 mg polyphenols (in 30 mL functional virgin olive oil) of which ∼25 mg OLEU and ∼1 mg HT | Postprandial: single dose, 5 h follow-up | ↑ Endothelial function (↑ IRH AUC), ↓ oxLDL (−5.2 U L−1), ↓ PAI-1, ↓ hsCRP, ↔ TC, LDL-C, HDL-C |
Ikonomidis et al. (2023) found that in patients with CCAS, one month of HT-enriched olive oil supplementation (10 mg HT per day) significantly improved blood lipid parameters and other cardiovascular health markers.74 Compared to baseline, consumption of HT-enriched olive oil led to reductions in TG (−0.47 mmol L−1), oxLDL (−18.9 ng mL−1), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) (−82.7 ng mL−1), and C-reactive protein concentrations (−2.7 mg L−1), with no such changes after placebo. Additionally, compared to baseline, there were significant improvements in vascular function, including increased flow-mediated dilation, improved pulse wave velocity, and enhanced coronary flow reserve, with no such changes after placebo. No significant effects were observed on blood pressure. These findings indicate that HT-enriched olive oil supplementation can improve blood lipid profiles and support cardiovascular health in patients with established coronary artery disease. However, it should be noted that the effects in the group consuming HT-enriched olive oil were not directly compared to those in the placebo group. Therefore, it is not clear whether these effects would remain significant when compared to placebo. Evidence from studies comparing the effects of the intervention to well-defined placebo conditions is needed to draw firm conclusions.
In a pilot clinical study by Naranjo et al. (2024), daily supplementation with an OLE containing 15 mg of HT per day for 45 days, initiated within 24 h post-ischemic stroke, led to a sustained reduction in diastolic blood pressure (−21.2 mmHg).75 TC and LDL-C also decreased substantially (−1.27 mmol L−1 and −1.08 mmol L−1, respectively), pointing to a favourable effect on lipid metabolism. Notably, the rise in nitric oxide, a marker of endothelial activation and oxidative stress, was attenuated in the HT group compared to controls (+3.3 µM vs. +5.4 µM). Proteomic analysis revealed downregulation of apolipoproteins ApoB100, ApoE, and ApoM, indicating potential anti-atherogenic effects. While these findings support a cardiovascular benefit of HT, the small sample size (n = 8) limits generalizability. Larger, controlled trials in stroke patients are needed to confirm these promising effects.
Several randomized controlled trials have explored the lipid-modulating potential of olive-derived polyphenols in hypertensive individuals. In a co-twin study, Perrinjaquet-Moccetti et al. (2008) investigated the effects of 500 and 1000 mg per day of OLE (standardized for 104 and 208 mg oleuropein per day, respectively) over eight weeks in borderline hypertensive monozygotic twins.63 The use of genetically identical twins helped control for interindividual variability, strengthening the evidence for a causal relationship between OLE supplementation and lipid improvements. At the higher dose, significant reductions in TC (−1.1 mmol L−1) and LDL-C (−0.6 mmol L−1) concentrations, alongside reductions in systolic (−11 mmHg) and diastolic (−4 mmHg) blood pressure were found. Interestingly, while the 500 mg dose did not significantly alter mean blood pressure levels, significant within-pair differences were observed, highlighting the sensitivity of the co-twin design to detect subtle effects. These findings underscore the potential of OLE as a complementary strategy for managing dyslipidaemia in hypertensive individuals, particularly when genetic and lifestyle factors are tightly controlled.
Susalit et al. (2011) confirmed these effects in a larger randomized controlled trial comparing 1000 mg per day OLE (standardized for ∼200 mg oleuropein) to an active control (12.5 mg captopril) in patients with stage-1 hypertension.64 After eight weeks, the OLE group showed significant reductions in TG (−0.13 mmol L−1) and TC concentrations (−0.15 mmol L−1) compared to baseline, with lipid-lowering effects most pronounced in participants with elevated baseline levels. Blood pressure reductions in the OLE group were comparable to those achieved with captopril treatment. Systolic blood pressure decreased by 13.8 mmHg with captopril and 11.5 mmHg with OLE, and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 6.5 mmHg and 4.7 mmHg, respectively. These reductions were not significantly different between groups, indicating that OLE was similarly effective to captopril in lowering blood pressure.
In a crossover trial, Valls et al. (2015) examined the acute effects of a single dose of 30 mL polyphenol-enriched virgin olive oil (standardized for ∼25 mg oleuropein and ∼1 mg HT) in pre- and stage-1 hypertensive individuals.76 Postprandial intake led to a 2.8% absolute increase in flow-mediated dilation, corresponding to a 76% relative improvement in endothelial function compared to baseline. In addition, a reduction in oxLDL (−4.9 U L−1) and TG (−0.10 mmol L−1) was found compared to baseline. These effects were not seen in the control group that consumed 30 mL non-enriched virgin olive oil, highlighting the vascular and lipid-modulating potential of polyphenol-rich olive oil formulations. However, it should be noted that the intervention group was not directly compared with the placebo group.
Lockyer et al. (2017) further supported these findings by demonstrating that six weeks of OLE supplementation (standardized for 136 mg oleuropein and 6 mg HT per day) significantly reduced serum TC (−0.32 mmol L−1), LDL-C (−0.19 mmol L−1), and TG (−0.18 mmol L−1) concentrations in prehypertensive men.77 Additionally, plasma IL-8 concentrations decreased (−0.63 pg mL−1), indicating an anti-inflammatory effect. These changes occurred alongside modest reductions in ambulatory blood pressure. No significant effects were observed on HDL-C or oxLDL concentrations.
The emerging clinical evidence supports the idea that olive leaf and olive oil polyphenols may offer lipid-lowering and vascular benefits in individuals with elevated cardiovascular risk, including those with existing coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, and hypertension. Across studies, improvements in lipid profiles, particularly reductions in serum LDL-C, TG, and oxLDL concentrations, were frequently observed, alongside enhancements in vascular function and inflammatory markers.
Compared to the healthy population studies, the studies discussed in the current section typically used higher doses (HT between 1–15 mg, oleuropein between 25–208 mg) for mostly longer durations (4–8 weeks). Blood lipid improvements across studies range from 0.1 to 1.27 mmol L−1. Although changes at the lower end of this range may appear modest, in populations with existing cardiovascular risk, even small reductions can contribute to improved risk profiles. For example, a reduction of 1 mmol L−1 in LDL-C is associated with approximately a 22–25% lower risk of major CVD events, based on large-scale meta-analyses of statin and non-statin lipid-lowering therapies.78,79 This is reinforced by evidence from Susalit et al. (2011),64 showing that OLE not only equalled captopril in lowering blood pressure but also improved LDL-C and TG, an effect absent in the drug-treated group. Such data highlight the potential of olive leaf polyphenols to offer metabolic benefits in individuals with elevated cardiovascular risk using a high dose (400 mg total polyphenols of which ∼200 mg oleuropein) and long duration (8 weeks).
| Author, year | Study subjects | Study design | Intervention characteristics | Intervention polyphenol content | Intervention duration | Significant effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ↑: significant increase; ↓: significant decrease, ↔ no significant effect. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HT = hydroxytyrosol; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OLE = olive leaf extract; OLEU = oleuropein; oxLDL = oxidised low-density lipoprotein; padj = adjusted p-value; RCT = randomized controlled trial; TC = total cholesterol; TG = triglycerides. | ||||||
de Bock et al., 2013 49 |
n = 46 overweight males, age = 35–55 years (mean ∼46 years), BMI = ∼28 kg m−2 | RCT, crossover, placebo controlled | OLE capsules vs. placebo, both with safflower oil | Total polyphenols: 61.9 mg per day, OLEU: 51.1 mg per day, HT: 9.7 mg per day | 12 weeks, 6-week washout | ↑ Insulin sensitivity (+15%); ↑ β-cell function (+28%); ↔ TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG |
Stevens et al., 2021 80 |
n = 77 overweight and obese adults with mildly elevated cholesterol (5–8 mmol L−1), age = 18–70 years (mean ∼56 years), BMI = ∼29 kg m−2 | RCT, placebo controlled | Bonolive® (250 mg OLE) + 100 mg maltodextrin vs. placebo (350 mg maltodextrin) | Standardized for 83.5 mg OLEU per day | 8 weeks | ↓ TG: −0.1 mmol L−1 after 4 weeks (p = 0.03), ↓ TG/HDL-C ratio −0.1 after 4 weeks (p = 0.02), but both not significant after correction for multiple testing (padj = 0.18 and padj = 0.16, respectively); ↔ TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, oxLDL |
Two randomized controlled trials have examined the effects of OLE supplementation on blood lipid profiles in this group. In a double-blind crossover trial, de Bock et al. (2013) supplemented 46 overweight men with OLE (standardized for 51.1 mg oleuropein per day and 9.7 mg HT per day) for 12 weeks.49 While lipid profiles remained unchanged, OLE significantly improved insulin sensitivity (+15%) and pancreatic β-cell responsiveness (+28%), independent of diet, physical activity, or body composition. These effects were accompanied by increases in IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2, markers of improved glucose regulation. The findings suggest that OLE may enhance glycaemic control in insulin-resistant individuals, even in the absence of lipid-lowering effects.
In contrast, Stevens et al. (2021) evaluated 8-week OLE supplementation (standardized for 83.5 mg oleuropein per day) in 77 overweight and obese adults with mildly elevated cholesterol.80 No significant changes were observed in lipid profiles, oxLDL, blood pressure, glucose, insulin, or liver function. A transient improvement in TG concentrations and the TG-to-HDL-C ratio at 4 weeks was observed, but this did not remain significant after correction for multiple testing. This ratio is considered a more sensitive marker of CV risk in overweight and insulin-resistant populations as it reflects atherogenic dyslipidaemia and correlates more strongly with insulin resistance and cardiovascular events than LDL-C alone.81,82
Together, these studies suggest that while OLE may not improve lipid parameters in overweight individuals, it seems that insulin sensitivity and β-cell function can be enhanced in those with early metabolic impairment. The absence of lipid-lowering effects may reflect differences in intervention duration, polyphenol composition, or metabolic responsiveness. Notably, improvements in lipid parameters have been observed in healthy individuals and those with elevated cardiovascular risk or established CVD, but not in the studied overweight or obese populations. One possible explanation is the relatively low polyphenol dose used in these studies (standardized for 51.1 and 83.5 mg oleuropein per day), which is substantially lower than the 100–200 mg per day of oleuropein used in other trials reporting lipid improvements (Perrinjaquet-Moccetti et al. (2008);63 Lockyer et al. (2017);77 Pinckaers et al. (2025)71). Therefore, at the doses and durations tested, clinically meaningful lipid lowering is unlikely in overweight or obese adults. Factors such as bioavailability, microbiome composition, and metabolic phenotype may also influence individual responses to OLE. These findings raise important questions about the metabolic context and intervention conditions under which olive leaf polyphenols are most effective. Future studies in overweight and metabolically impaired populations should consider using higher doses of polyphenols (∼100–200 mg per day of oleuropein and >10 mg HT), comparable to those used in trials that reported lipid improvements, to better assess therapeutic potential in this specific group.
| Author, year | Study subjects | Study design | Intervention characteristics | Polyphenol content | Intervention duration | Significant effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ↑: significant increase; ↓: significant decrease, ↔ no significant effect. Abbreviations: HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HT = hydroxytyrosol, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, OLE = olive leaf extract, OLEU = oleuropein, RCT = randomized controlled trial, TC = total cholesterol, TG = triglycerides, TG/HDL-C = triglyceride to HDL-cholesterol ratio. | ||||||
Filip et al., 2015 62 |
n = 64 postmenopausal women with osteopenia, age = 49–68 years (mean ∼60 years), baseline TC: ∼6.1–6.4 mmol L−1 | RCT, placebo-controlled, parallel | Bonolive®: OLE 250 mg per day + 1000 mg Ca vs. placebo (1000 mg Calcium) | 100 mg per day OLEU | 12 months | ↓ TC: −0.7 mmol L−1, ↓ LDL-C: −0.9 mmol L−1, ↔ TG and HDL-C |
Imperatrice et al., 2024 87 |
n = 60 postmenopausal women, age 47–70 years (mean ∼59 years), baseline TC: ∼5.7–6.0 mmol L−1 | RCT, placebo-controlled, parallel | Bonolive®: OLE 250 mg per day vs. placebo (cellulose) | 100 mg per day OLEU | 12 weeks | ↓ TG: −0.1 mmol L−1, ↓ TG/HDL-C ratio: −0.1, ↔ TC, LDL-C, HDL-C |
Lopez-Huertas & Fonolla, 2017 83 |
n = 14 mild hyperlipidaemic adults, age = 25–42 years (mean ∼34 years), baseline TC: ∼5.2–6.2 mmol L−1 | Single-arm, open-label, before-after | Pure HT 45 mg per day in saline solution | 45 mg per day HT | 8 weeks | ↑ Vitamin C: +24.4 µmol L−1, ↔ TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG |
Lopez-Huertas et al. (2017) administered a purified HT supplement (45 mg per day) to mildly hyperlipidaemic volunteers for 8 weeks.83 Despite the relatively high dose, no significant changes were observed in serum TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, or TG concentrations compared to baseline. Interestingly, the intervention led to a two-fold increase in circulating vitamin C levels, indicating a potential antioxidant-sparing effect. These findings indicate that HT alone, at this dose and in this population, may not exert lipid-lowering effects, though it may enhance systemic antioxidant capacity. In addition, it should be noted that this study did not include a control group; therefore, only changes compared to baseline could be investigated.
Although post menopause is a natural physiological stage rather than a disorder, hormonal changes during this period are associated with adverse shifts in lipid metabolism.84 Menopause induces a shift in lipid metabolism, typically resulting in higher serum TC, LDL-C, and TG concentrations, alongside reduced HDL-C concentrations.84 These changes are primarily driven by declining oestrogen levels.84 Oestradiol, the main biologically active oestrogen, is synthesized in the ovaries using LDL-C as a precursor.85 After menopause, this pathway becomes inactive, leading to reduced oestrogen synthesis and a corresponding rise in circulating LDL-C concentrations.86 This mechanism contributes, amongst others, to the increased cardiovascular risk observed in postmenopausal women. As such, postmenopausal women represent a population at increased risk for lipid disorders and cardiovascular disease.
Two randomized controlled trials have investigated the effects of olive leaf polyphenols on lipid metabolism in postmenopausal women. In a 12-week study by Imperatrice et al. (2024), 60 healthy postmenopausal women received 250 mg OLE per day (standardized for 100 mg oleuropein).87 At baseline, these women had mild hyperlipidaemia (average TC between 5.13–6.91 mmol L−1). The intervention led to a significant reduction in TG (−0.1 mmol L−1) and the TG/HDL-C ratio (−0.1) compared to placebo, although no changes were observed in other lipid parameters.
In a longer trial by Filip et al. (2015), postmenopausal women with osteopenia were supplemented with 250 mg OLE per day (standardized for 100 mg oleuropein) for 12 months, alongside 1000 mg of calcium.62 At baseline, these women had mild-to-moderate hyperlipidaemia (average TC between 5.53–7.35 mmol L−1). This study reported significant reductions in TC (−0.68 mmol L−1) and LDL-C (0.90 mmol L−1) concentrations, in addition to improvements in bone markers such as osteocalcin (+32%). TG and HDL concentrations did not change.
Taken together, the available evidence suggests that olive leaf polyphenols exert modest lipid-lowering effects in individuals with (mild) hyperlipidaemia, particularly in postmenopausal women, with a clear distinction between short- and long-term responses. From a clinical perspective, these three trials suggest that the lipid-modulating potential of olive leaf polyphenols in hyperlipidaemic populations is strongly dependent on both formulation and intervention duration. The 8-week study using purified HT alone (Lopez-Huertas & Fonolla, 2017
83) did not produce lipid improvements, although the two-fold increase in circulating vitamin C suggests that systemic antioxidant shifts may precede measurable changes in lipid parameters. In contrast, both OLE interventions (Imperatrice et al., 2024;87 Filip et al., 2015
62), containing a broader polyphenolic matrix, showed progressively stronger effects with increasing duration; selective reductions in TG and TG/HDL-C ratio after 12 weeks, and clinically meaningful decreases in TC (−0.68 mmol L−1) and LDL-C (−0.90 mmol L−1) after 12 months. These LDL-C reductions fall within a range associated with modest cardiovascular risk reduction, even in mildly hyperlipidaemic individuals. Overall, while promising, the current evidence base remains limited in scale and is heterogeneous, underscoring the need for larger, well-controlled trials to confirm efficacy and clarify optimal dose, formulation, and intervention length.
Both oleuropein and HT can directly neutralize reactive oxygen species (ROS) through electron donation, thereby reducing oxidative stress at the cellular level.88,89 In addition to direct scavenging, these compounds upregulate endogenous antioxidant systems. Several studies report increased activity and/or expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) following exposure to olive polyphenols.90–93 Improvements in glutathione homeostasis, such as normalization of total glutathione or restoration of the GSH/GSSG ratio, have also been observed under oxidative challenge.92,94
Olive polyphenols additionally modulate Nrf2 signalling, a key regulator of cellular antioxidant defence. In spontaneously hypertensive rats, oleuropein increased the expression of Nrf2 and its downstream targets, including NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO-1) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. This was accompanied by improved mitochondrial biogenesis, reduced superoxide production, and enhanced antioxidant capacity.95 HT similarly supports mitochondrial function by increasing respiratory chain activity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mtDNA content, mediated through regulators such as PGC-1α, AMPK, Akt, and FOXO3a.92,93,96–101 These mitochondrial effects are relevant to fatty acid oxidation and overall metabolic resilience.
Lipid protection is another consistent finding. In animal models, oleuropein reduced lipid peroxidation markers such as MDA and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances across multiple tissues, including heart, liver, kidney, pancreas, and testes.102–106 HT has been shown to protect LDL particles from oxidative modification, a critical step in atherogenesis. In animal studies, HT reduced circulating oxidised LDL levels,107,108 which was mechanistically linked to an increase in LDL lag-time,109,110 indicating delayed oxidation. In vitro, HT protected LDL from oxidation,89 and its incorporation into LDL particles was associated with reduced oxidation.69,111,112 In addition, HT may enhance aryl esterase activity on HDL, contributing to LDL protection via HDL-mediated antioxidant defence.113,114
Vascular and cellular antioxidant effects have also been reported. Oleuropein lowered ROS levels in platelets stimulated with arachidonic acid via NOX2 inhibition,115 and may counteract endothelial dysfunction by preventing the accumulation of asymmetric dimethylarginine, a known inhibitor of NO synthesis.116 In rat aorta models, HT reduced ROS production,117 and in human endothelial cells and erythrocytes, it showed dose-dependent scavenging activity.93,118,119 HT reduced oxidative burst in macrophages,120 and decreased monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells,121 which suggests that antioxidant effects may translate to reduced early atherogenic signaling.
Finally, olive polyphenols protect cellular integrity under oxidative stress. In bisphenol A-treated rats, oleuropein reduced oxidative DNA damage and improved trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity in liver and kidney tissue.91,122 Furthermore, polyphenol-rich olive extracts containing oleuropein protected against genotoxicity induced by heterocyclic amines in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, pointing towards a broader systemic antioxidant role.123 In pancreatic β-cells and skeletal muscle cells, olive polyphenols attenuated ROS-induced cytotoxicity and preserved glucose-responsive function.124–126 These findings suggest that olive leaf polyphenols may indirectly support lipid metabolism by preserving insulin sensitivity and β-cell function under oxidative stress.
Collectively, these data indicate that olive polyphenols, through direct antioxidant actions, reinforcement of endogenous defense pathways, protection of mitochondrial function, and reduction of lipid and DNA oxidation, provide support against oxidative stress. These actions are particularly relevant in the context of atherogenesis, where oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation play a central role in atherosclerosis progression.
A first set of mechanisms involves modulation of key enzymes in lipid biosynthesis and oxidation. Oleuropein has been shown to inhibit key enzymes involved in lipid biosynthesis, including acetyl-CoA carboxylase and fatty acid synthase (fatty acid biosynthesis), diacylglycerol acyltransferase (TG synthesis), and HMG-CoA reductase (cholesterol synthesis).128 In addition, oleuropein activated AMPK in adipose tissue, a central metabolic regulator that inhibits lipogenesis and promotes fatty acid oxidation through phosphorylation of downstream targets.124 These enzymatic effects collectively suppress lipid accumulation and promote a metabolic shift toward greater lipid catabolism.
In parallel with these enzymatic effects, olive leaf polyphenols exert transcriptional control over lipid-regulatory pathways. Oleuropein suppressed the expression of key adipogenic and lipogenic genes, including PPARγ, C/EBPα, SREBP-1c, FAS, LPL, FABP-4, and CD36 in preadipocyte cell lines.129–131 This transcriptional suppression limits lipid storage in adipocytes and limits adipose tissue expansion, thereby reducing the flux of free fatty acids and improving systemic lipid handling. HT produces similar anti-adipogenic effects. In vitro, HT reduced TG storage in 3T3-L1 adipocytes,99,130 and increased glycerol release, indicating enhanced lipolysis.130 Additionally, HT inhibited adipocyte differentiation in these 3T3-L1 cells.130 These transcriptional actions help limit free fatty acid spillover from adipose tissue and improve systemic lipid handling.
Olive polyphenols also affect lipid distribution and circulating lipoprotein levels in vivo. HT supplementation significantly reduced TG accumulation in blood, liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue.92 Similar effects were observed in rats,94 and in high-fat diet-fed rats, where serum cholesterol levels were lowered.132 HT also influenced circulating lipoprotein levels. In obese rats, HT lowered both LDL-C and HDL-C,92 while in control rats, 0.03% dietary HT reduced total plasma cholesterol.94 Additionally, HT treatment inhibited epididymal and perirenal fat accumulation and limited liver weight gain in obese mice,92 suggesting systemic effects on lipid storage and distribution.
At the mitochondrial level, HT supports enhanced lipid oxidation. In db/db mice, HT improved mitochondrial function, as evidenced by increased complex I and IV activity in skeletal muscle.92 In vitro, HT increased oxygen consumption in adipocytes, suggesting a shift toward oxidative metabolism,92 and upregulated markers of mitochondrial biogenesis and mass.99 HT also modulates regulators such as PGC-1α and UCP-2 expression.98 Beyond fatty acid oxidation, in foam cells HT has been shown to activate the PPARγ/LXRα pathway, leading to upregulation of ABCA1 expression and enhanced cholesterol efflux, thereby reducing intracellular cholesterol accumulation and potentially limiting atherogenesis.133
HT may also inhibit hepatic de novo lipogenesis. In obese mice, HT reduced hepatic SREBP-1c expression,92 suggesting decreased synthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol. Together, these mitochondrial and transcriptional effects reinforce a metabolic phenotype favouring lipid oxidation over lipid accumulation.
It is worth noting that not all findings are consistent. A 2006 study reported that HT supplementation for 10 weeks in ApoE-deficient mice increased plasma cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), and LDL-C levels, reduced ApoA-1, and led to a 17.9% increase in atherosclerotic lesion area, alongside enhanced monocyte activation.134 The authors concluded that isolated HT, outside the olive oil matrix, could exert pro-atherogenic effects. However, these findings have since been challenged by more recent research. A 2020 study using a similar ApoE-deficient mouse model found that HT administration over 16 weeks significantly reduced atherosclerotic lesion area by 26.9%, while also lowering serum TG (−17.4%), TC (−15.2%), and LDL-C (−17.9%), and increasing HDL-C (+26.9%) concentrations.135 Given the comparable model and extended intervention period, the more recent findings likely provide a more accurate reflection of the effects of HT, suggesting a predominantly protective role in atherosclerosis.
Although human mechanistic evidence remains limited, one randomized, controlled crossover trial examined in vivo transcriptomic responses in white blood cells following consumption of a single dose of polyphenol-rich olive oil (with 26 mg oleuropein-derived secoiridoids and 1 mg HT). The intervention upregulated genes involved in cholesterol efflux and lipid handling, including ABCA1, SR-B1, CD36, PPARα, PPARBP, PPARγ and PPARδ.136 As the polyphenol profile was dominated by oleuropein-derived secoiridoids rather than glycosylated oleuropein, these findings cannot be directly extrapolated to olive leaf polyphenols. However, the study offers supportive evidence that olive polyphenols can modulate lipid-related pathways in humans.
In summary, olive leaf polyphenols modulate lipid metabolism through suppression of lipogenesis, inhibition of lipid biosynthetic enzymes, promotion of fatty acid oxidation, and enhancement of cholesterol efflux. These actions are mediated by AMPK, PPARγ/LXRα, and SREBP-1c signalling pathways and have been observed across multiple metabolic tissues.
Olive leaf polyphenols consistently reduce the production of key pro-inflammatory cytokines across cell models. In murine macrophages and adipocytes, oleuropein has been shown to suppress the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, primarily via AMPK activation, which inhibits NF-κB signalling.124,137 HT reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in macrophages (THP-1 and RAW264.7 cells), including TNF-α and IL-1β, and inhibited NF-κB and MAPK signalling.138,139 HT also promoted M2 macrophage polarization, which is associated with enhanced cholesterol efflux and resolution of inflammation.140
Anti-inflammatory effects extend beyond immune cells. Oleuropein blocked IL-4-induced transcriptional activity and prevented eosinophil and macrophage infiltration in epithelial cell cultures, reducing inflammation-associated tissue remodelling.141 In gastric ulcer models, high-dose oleuropein reversed HCl/ethanol-induced increases in IL-1β and TNF-α, suggesting systemic anti-inflammatory potential.142 Oleuropein also inhibited 5-lipoxygenase, reduced leukotriene B4 production in leukocyte models,56,143 and suppressed COX-2 and prostaglandin E2 synthesis in cultured endothelial cells, contributing to reduced angiogenic and inflammatory signalling.144 HT exerts anti-inflammatory effects in non-immune cells as well. In senescent MRC5 and NHDF fibroblasts, chronic HT exposure lowered IL-6 and NF-κB activity.145 In keratinocytes, HT inhibited IL-1β-, IL-6-, and IL-8-induced gene expression.146 In HaCaT cells stimulated with a psoriatic cytokine cocktail, HT reduced IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α.147 In colonic epithelial cells exposed to benzo[a]pyrene, HT suppressed IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, and CXCL13, and inhibited ERK1/2 phosphorylation.148 These effects may indirectly influence lipid metabolism via systemic inflammation and gut–liver axis signalling.
Olive leaf polyphenols also modulate inflammatory pathways in vivo. In a pristane-induced lupus model, oral HT reduced IL-1β and IL-6 in splenocytes and macrophages, and inhibited NF-κB and MAPK signalling in renal tissue.149 In LPS-induced liver injury (C57BL/6 mice), HT shifted macrophage polarization toward M2 and lowered hepatic TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6.140 Given the liver's central role in lipid metabolism, this suggests HT may improve lipid handling by reducing hepatic inflammation. In ApoE-deficient mice, HT reduced aortic plaque burden and systemic inflammatory markers (CRP, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), while increasing IL-10.135 This anti-inflammatory profile is associated with improved lipid profiles and reduced atherogenesis. In DSS-induced colitis, HT suppressed IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and NF-κB activation, and modulated gut microbiota composition toward anti-inflammatory profiles, leading to an increased production of short-chain fatty acids.150,151 In neuronal tissue in the hippocampus of mice, oleuropein lowered TNF-α and IL-1β levels, indicating broader systemic anti-inflammatory effects.152 Together, these findings support a systemic anti-inflammatory role that intersects with hepatic lipid handling, vascular inflammation, and immune-metabolic crosstalk.
Inflammation-induced endothelial activation plays a key role in early atherogenesis. Olive leaf polyphenols reduced adhesion molecule expression, including VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, in activated endothelial cells.121,141,144,153,154 This limits monocyte adhesion and infiltration into the vascular wall, helping to prevent foam cell formation and the development of lipid-rich plaques. HT-induced reductions in NF-κB activation in endothelial models further contribute to vascular protection by stabilizing endothelial function under inflammatory stress.154,155 These effects may attenuate foam cell formation and slow the progression of lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques.
Beyond cytokine modulation, olive leaf polyphenols support vascular homeostasis by enhancing nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Studies in animal models and endothelial cells show that oleuropein enhanced NO bioavailability by reducing oxidative stress and preventing accumulation of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of NO synthase.116 This may improve endothelial-dependent vasodilation and reduce LDL oxidation, both relevant to lipid-driven vascular injury.
Olive leaf polyphenols may also influence platelet activation, a key process in atherothrombosis, through their capacity to attenuate redox-sensitive signalling steps involved in collagen- and thrombin-induced platelet reactivity. In vitro studies show that OLE can dose-dependently inhibit platelet aggregation and ATP release, an effect attributed to their strong hydrogen-peroxide-scavenging activity.156 Broader mechanistic work indicates that olive-derived phenolics reduce thromboxane B2 formation, dampen NOX2-mediated ROS generation, and limit the release of pro-atherogenic mediators such as CD40L and PDGF, suggesting that multiple constituents within the olive polyphenol matrix converge on oxidative and eicosanoid pathways central to platelet activation.157 Together, these findings support a plausible mechanistic role for olive polyphenols in modulating platelet-driven processes relevant to atherothrombosis.
Together, these data indicate that olive leaf polyphenols mitigate systemic and vascular inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB/MAPK signalling, modulating macrophage polarization, reducing cytokine production, improving endothelial function, and inhibit platelet aggregation. These mechanisms are relevant to blood lipid regulation because they influence hepatic lipid metabolism, macrophage-driven foam cell formation, and vascular inflammation, which are key processes in dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis.
A major limitation in the current literature is the heterogeneity in intervention composition. Many studies use OLE or polyphenol-enriched oils with varying and often poorly defined concentrations of total phenols, oleuropein, and HT, complicating dose–response analysis and hindering comparability across studies. In addition to compositional variability, study designs often lack robust control conditions. Several trials do not include a placebo group, while others compare low versus high polyphenolic content without a true control. Furthermore, some studies only report within-group changes despite having a control arm. This limits the interpretability of outcomes and weakens the strength of the evidence. Future studies should use standardized, placebo-controlled designs using olive leaf interventions with fully quantified phenolic profiles to enable meaningful dose–response comparisons and clearer interpretation of mechanistic outcomes. In addition, proper statistical analyses comparing treatment groups to controls, instead of relying on within-group changes from baseline, should be used.
A further limitation is the poor characterization of bioavailability; reported plasma concentrations of oleuropein and HT are typically in the nanomolar range and highly variable, analytical methods for phenol quantification lack standardization, and studies do not account for microbiota-dependent metabolism, despite evidence that gut microbiota markedly affect oleuropein degradation and HT production.158–161 Future studies should incorporate microbiome profiling, as interindividual differences in gut microbial metabolism of oleuropein and HT may influence bioavailability and thereby modify their effect.
Moreover, mechanistic insights derived from olive oil-derived polyphenol studies cannot be directly extrapolated to olive leaf polyphenols, as olive oil contains predominantly secoiridoid aglycones within a lipid-rich matrix, whereas olive leaf extracts primarily provide glycosylated oleuropein and HT in a different compositional and metabolic context.
Finally, mechanistic endpoints are underreported in clinical trials. While several studies demonstrate effects on lipid parameters, few include molecular or cellular markers that could clarify underlying mechanisms in humans. As a result, many mechanistic pathways described in the preclinical literature have not yet been conclusively demonstrated in humans, limiting the translational value of these findings and hampering the ability to bridge in vitro insights with in vivo clinical outcomes. Future clinical studies should incorporate mechanistic endpoints, such as gene expression, inflammatory markers, or ex vivo cellular assays with human samples, to clarify how olive leaf polyphenols exert their effects at the molecular level for the development of more targeted applications.
Together, these gaps highlight the need for well-controlled trials using well-defined standardized OLE interventions with mechanistic endpoints and stratification by metabolic phenotype. Such approaches will enhance the interpretability of findings and allow for more accurate observation of health effects, minimizing confounding factors. Moreover, by integrating microbiota-related analyses, future studies may help identify which individuals are most likely to benefit from olive leaf polyphenol interventions.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |