Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Unraveling the interfacial compatibility of ultrahigh nickel cathodes and chloride solid electrolyte for stable all-solid-state lithium batteries
Feng
Li
a,
Ye-Chao
Wu
bc,
Xiao-Bin
Cheng
b,
Yihong
Tan
d,
Jin-Da
Luo
b,
Ruijun
Pan
c,
Tao
Ma
e,
Lei-Lei
Lu
a,
Xiaolei
Wen
f,
Zheng
Liang
*d and
Hong-Bin
Yao
*ab
aDivision of Nanomaterials and Chemistry, Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China. E-mail: yhb@ustc.edu.cn
bDepartment of Applied Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
cHefei Gotion High-tech Power Energy Co., Ltd., Hefei, Anhui 230012, China
dFrontiers Science Center for Transformative Molecules, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. E-mail: liangzheng06@sjtu.edu.cn
eEngineering Research Center of High-frequency Soft Magnetic Materials and Ceramic Powder Materials of Anhui Province School of Chemistry and Material Engineering, Chaohu University, Hefei, Anhui 238024, China
fCenter for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230012, China
First published on 12th February 2026
Abstract
Correction for ‘Unraveling the interfacial compatibility of ultrahigh nickel cathodes and chloride solid electrolyte for stable all-solid-state lithium batteries’ by Feng Li et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 4187–4195, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE01302F.
The authors regret an error in the preparation of Fig. 3b.
 | ||
| Fig. 3 (b) Boxplots of the normalized intensity of TaClO− fragments of the OCV and aged cathodes. | ||
In the originally published version of this Article, Fig. 3b (Box dataset of TaClO− for 4.3, 4.6 and 4.8 V) was inadvertently plotted using the dataset intended for Supplementary Fig. 13b (Box dataset of ClO− for 4.3, 4.6 and 4.8 V), due to a copy-paste error during figure preparation. We sincerely regret this oversight and have now provided the corrected version of Fig. 3b using the right raw dataset.
Although the original figure presented incorrect data inadvertently, the associated interpretation in the main text remains accurate. The interface variation discussion is independently supported by the signal intensity trend observed in Supplementary Fig. S11 and 12b, which shows a similar trend to Fig. 3b. This correction does not affect any other scientific descriptions, results, analyses, or conclusions in the paper.
An independent expert has viewed the corrected Fig. 3b and has concluded that it is consistent with the conclusions presented.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |