Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Osteopromotive carbon dots promote bone regeneration through the PERK-eIF2α-ATF4 pathway

Nianqiang Jina, Nuo Jina, Zilin Wangb, Lili Liub, Lin Mengb, Daowei Lic, Xing Lia, Dabo Zhoud, Jie Liue, Wenhuan Bu*fg, Hongchen Sun*a and Bai Yangh
aDepartment of Oral Pathology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, 110001, Shenyang, China. E-mail: hcsun@jlu.edu.cn; nqjin@cmu.edu.cn; 2435841770@qq.com; lixing15@mails.jlu.edu.cn; Tel: +18686531003
bDepartment of Oral Pathology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, 130000, Changchun, China. E-mail: wangzl17@mails.jlu.edu.cn; llliu19@mails.jlu.edu.cn; 1609047433@qq.com
cJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Tooth Development and Bone Remodeling, School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China. E-mail: jluldw@jlu.edu.cn; byangchem@jlu.edu.cn
dSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, 117 Nanjing North Street, Shenyang, 110001, China. E-mail: dabozhou@126.com
eDepartment of Head and Neck Tumor Surgery, School of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430000, China. E-mail: a1991liujie@163.com
fDepartment of Dental Materials, School of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China. E-mail: whbu@cmu.edu.cn
gDepartment of Center Laboratory, School of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
hState Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, 130012, Changchun, China

Received 20th April 2026 , Accepted 20th April 2026

First published on 27th April 2026


Abstract

Correction for ‘Osteopromotive carbon dots promote bone regeneration through the PERK-eIF2α-ATF4 pathway’ by Nianqiang Jin et al., Biomater. Sci., 2020, 8, 2840–2852, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00424C.


The authors regret an error in Fig. 2d. The panel for OM+CDs at 7 days was incorrect. The corrected figure is shown herein.
image file: d6bm90034h-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Influences of CDs on osteogenic differentiation. (a) MTT assay. (b) Immunofluorescence staining of BSP. (c) Immunofluorescence staining of OSN. (d) ALP staining. (e) Quantitative analysis of ALP activity. (f) ARS staining. (g) Quantitative analysis of ARS staining. CON, control; OM, osteogenic medium; OM + CDs, osteogenic medium plus CDs. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 vs. control, and #p < 0.05 vs. OM.

An independent expert has viewed the corrected Fig. 2 and confirmed that it is consistent with the discussions and conclusions presented.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.