Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

A scalable zinc-based coordination network for energy-efficient NF3/CF4 separation with unprecedented selectivity

Yi-Tao Li a, Weilin Lib, Li-Ping Zhanga, Na Gengc, Li Xua, Shao-Min Wanga, Tingyu Zhuc, Qingqing Guan*d, Yangyang Guo*c, Xingxing Li*b and Qing-Yuan Yang*a
aState Key Laboratory of Fluorine & Nitrogen Chemicals, National Innovation Platform (Center) for Industry-Education Integration of Energy Storage Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China. E-mail: qingyuan.yang@xjtu.edu.cn
bHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui 230026, China. E-mail: lixx@ustc.edu.cn
cCAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. E-mail: yyguo@ipe.ac.cn
dKey Laboratory of Oil and Gas Fine Chemicals of Ministry of Education, College of Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China. E-mail: guanqq@xju.edu.cn

Received 5th July 2025 , Accepted 5th August 2025

First published on 6th August 2025


Abstract

Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) and carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) are critical gases in the semiconductor industry. However, their current lack of effective recycling and separation results in significant waste emissions, which are not only costly but also pose significant environmental challenges. Their separation remains a critical challenge due to their nearly identical physicochemical properties (Δbp <1 °C, similar polarizability). Here, we demonstrate that a zinc-based metal–organic framework (CALF-20) with precisely tuned 4.8 Å pores achieves exceptional NF3/CF4 separation through molecular sieving. At 298 K, this material exhibits a record-high NF3/CF4 adsorption ratio of 41.1, and a CF4 purity of 99.5% can be achieved through breakthrough experiments. Structural characterization and computational studies reveal that the unique pore channel properties preferentially adsorb NF3 (kinetic diameter: 4.5 Å) while effectively excluding CF4 (4.8 Å). This advance enables cost-effective gas purification at $12.3 per kilogram, providing a practical solution for sustainable semiconductor manufacturing.


Introduction

Following a decade of advancement, the global semiconductor market is projected to attain a valuation of one trillion dollars by the year 2030.1 Fluorinated electronic specialty gases, including NF3, CF4 and other fluorinated gases, play an essential role in contemporary semiconductor manufacturing due to their distinctive chemical reactivity during plasma etching and cleaning processes.2,3 However, the semiconductor industry, which serves as a fundamental component of the global digital economy, is confronted with a growing environmental dilemma. The fluorinated process gases critical to semiconductor manufacturing – nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) and carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) – exhibit extraordinarily high global warming potentials (GWPs) of 17[thin space (1/6-em)]200 and 6500 CO2-equivalent, respectively, with atmospheric lifetimes of 740 years for NF3 and 50[thin space (1/6-em)]000 years for CF4.4,5 In the semiconductor manufacturing process, only a small portion of fluorinated gases are fully utilized, and a large amount of CF4 and NF3 exhaust gases remain stable after etching and cleaning, requiring high-temperature combustion or thermal plasma decomposition to effectively remove them.6 Despite the treatment of exhaust gases, these trace amounts of fluorine-containing compounds inevitably escape into the atmosphere through ventilation systems.7 The emissions of fluorinated gases from the global semiconductor industry are experiencing a year-on-year increase, which poses a considerable threat to the environment.8,9 The separation and recycling of NF3 and CF4 through advanced separation technologies not only enable their efficient recovery for industrial reuse—significantly reducing operational costs—but also promote optimal resource utilization. Importantly, this approach significantly mitigates F-gas emissions, substantially diminishing their environmental impact.

Current industrial recovery of fluorinated gases predominantly relies on cryogenic distillation and liquefaction techniques, which operate under energetically demanding high-pressure and low-temperature conditions.10,11 Porous adsorbent-based separation has emerged as an energy-efficient and economically viable strategy for the enrichment and recovery of high-value specialty gases. Porous materials—including zeolites,12 activated carbons,13–15 metal–organic frameworks (MOFs),16,17 and porous organic cages—have demonstrated potential for fluorinated gas (F-gas) separation. However, while numerous traditional porous materials have been investigated for NF3/N2 and CF4/N2 separation, most reported adsorbents demonstrate limited selectivity for NF3/CF4. The separation of NF3 and CF4 remains a significant challenge in gas purification due to their nearly identical kinetic diameters. The urgency to address this challenge is further emphasized by the pledge of the semiconductor industry to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.18 This imperative demands the development of advanced materials that can effectively balance industrial scalability requirements with the need for molecular-level precision (Scheme 1).


image file: d5sc04966k-s1.tif
Scheme 1 (A) A comparison of some physical parameters of NF3 and CF4 and the pore structure of CALF-20. (B) The NF3/CF4 mixture in semiconductor manufacturing is efficiently separated, purified, and recycled through a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) device packed with CALF-20.

MOFs have emerged as highly efficient adsorbents for gas separation, offering tunable pore geometries and chemical functionalities.19 Recent advances in ultra-microporous MOFs (pore size <7 Å) demonstrate exceptional selectivity for fluorinated gases (F-gases) via size exclusion and host–guest interactions. For instance, amino-functionalized NH2–Ni-MOF achieves a CF4/N2 selectivity of 46.3 through optimized van der Waals interactions,20 while Co-MOF-74 exhibits NF3/N2 selectivity of 299.6 via Lewis acid–base interactions at open metal sites.21 Although some MOF materials have exhibited favorable performance in separating specific fluorinated gases, no MOF material has currently achieved effective sieving of NF3/CF4. This is primarily due to the critical limitations inherent in MOF materials: (1) pore collapse during F-gas adsorption (e.g., the M-MOF-74 series), whereas CALF-20 maintains high stability in both five cycles of static NF3 adsorption and dynamic breakthrough experiments; (2) the failure of previous adsorbents to discriminate between NF3 and CF4 during adsorption processes, in contrast to CALF-20, which exhibits a record-high NF3/CF4 adsorption ratio of 41.1; (3) synthetic complexity that hinders scale-up, while CALF-20 is the first MOF material produced on an industrial scale. Achieving simultaneous high selectivity, structural stability, and industrial viability remains a long-standing challenge.

Extensive research suggests that realizing efficient NF3/CF4 separation necessitates MOF materials with meticulously tailored pore dimensions and the exclusion of open metal sites. These rigorous specifications substantially narrow the scope of candidate materials. When stability requirements and cost considerations are additionally factored in, CALF-20 emerges as the most promising viable option currently available. The separation of NF3 and CF4, key fluorinated gases in semiconductor manufacturing, poses a significant challenge due to their similar kinetic diameters. Despite extensive research on MOFs as potential adsorbents for gas separation, achieving efficient NF3/CF4 separation remains elusive. Existing MOF materials either lack the precise pore sizes required for molecular sieving or suffer from poor recyclability under industrial conditions, with many frameworks experiencing structural degradation after repeated adsorption cycles.

To address these limitations, this study focuses on developing scalable MOF adsorbents capable of molecular discrimination and practical recyclabilityfor NF3/CF4 separation. Herein, we introduce CALF-20, an industrially viable MOF engineered with precisely tuned 4.8 Å ultra-micropores. By utilizing steric exclusion effects, CALF-20 is designed to overcome the long-standing challenge of separating NF3 and CF4. Notably, this material exhibits a record-high NF3/CF4 selectivity of 41.1 and achieves >99.5% CF4 purity in breakthrough experiments.

This work not only proposes a material design strategy for targeted gas separation but also demonstrates the potential of CALF-20 in enabling the recovery of NF3 and CF4 through PSA systems. Such an approach offers a sustainable pathway for the energy-efficient recovery of fluorinated gases, in line with the goal of the semiconductor industry to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.22

Results and discussion

Adsorption performance of CALF-20 for NF3

CALF-20 is constructed from zinc(II) ion layers interconnected by 1,2,4-triazole ligands and oxalate ion ligand pillars.23 In recent years, numerous studies on gas separation systems related to CALF-20 have been published,24–26 and we have also explored its adsorption properties.27,28 However, there has been no prior report on CALF-20 for the adsorption of NF3 and CF4. This study represents the first investigation into the adsorption and separation performance of CALF-20 for NF3/CF4. As a robust adsorbent for NF3 capture, CALF-20 demonstrates exceptional structural integrity and cycling stability under various operational conditions (Fig. 1). The temperature-dependent adsorption isotherms (273–313 K) reveal a characteristic Type I physisorption behavior, with NF3 uptake capacity increasing systematically from 32.1 cm3 g−1 at 313 K to 51.1 cm3 g−1 at 273 K, following expected thermodynamic trends (Fig. 1A). Remarkably, five consecutive adsorption–desorption cycles at 298 K (Fig. 1B) show outstanding reproducibility, with NF3 working capacity maintained at 37.4 ± 0.7 cm3 g−1 (variation <2%), demonstrating excellent cycling stability that meets industrial requirements for long-term operation. Notably, CALF-20 demonstrates exceptional stability toward NF3 – a unique characteristic unmatched by other MOF materials. To our knowledge, it represents the first MOF capable of maintaining consistent NF3 adsorption performance through multiple cycles without observable performance degradation. Comprehensive characterization further confirms the structural robustness of the framework. The PXRD patterns (Fig. 1C) display identical peak positions and intensities both before and after NF3 exposure. There is no observable peak broadening, and no new phases emerge, which indicates that the crystallinity is completely retained. N2 physisorption measurements (Fig. 1D and E) show minimal changes in porosity, with BET surface area decreasing only slightly from 467 m2 g−1 to 458 m2 g−1 (<2.5% reduction) and pore volume remaining essentially unchanged (0.38 cm3 g−1 vs. 0.37 cm3 g−1), suggesting negligible pore damage or structural collapse. These results are supplemented by a five-dimensional performance evaluation (Fig. 1F) that quantitatively assesses the balanced characteristics of CALF-20, including its high NF3 uptake capacity (performance), excellent cycling stability (stability), mild regeneration conditions (regeneration), scalable synthesis (cost), and wide operating temperature range (scale up).
image file: d5sc04966k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Adsorption properties and cycling stability of CALF-20 for NF3 capture. (A) The NF3 adsorption isotherms on CALF-20 at different temperatures. (B) Capacity retention performance of NF3 cycle adsorption. (C) The PXRD pattern of CALF-20 before and after NF3 adsorption. (D) The N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K before NF3 adsorption. (E) The N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K after NF3 adsorption. (F) The five-criteria radar chart of the CALF-20.

The combined evidence from these systematic characterizations establishes CALF-20 as a structurally durable and practically viable adsorbent for industrial NF3 separation processes, offering significant advantages over traditional materials in terms of both performance and operational stability. The ability of the material to maintain its adsorption capacity and structural integrity under repeated cycling, coupled with its temperature-dependent tunability, positions it as a promising candidate for pressure-swing adsorption applications in fluorocarbon purification.

Molecular sieving for efficient NF3/CF4 separation

CALF-20 exhibited negligible adsorption of CF4 across the temperature range of 273–313 K. Adsorption isotherms at 298 K establish CALF-20 as a near-ideal molecular sieve, exhibiting complete exclusion of CF4 (uptake <1 cm3 g−1) while achieving suitable NF3 capacity (37.4 cm3 g−1 at 100 kPa) (Fig. 2A). Our study reveals that CALF-20 exhibits unique temperature-dependent molecular sieving properties. Across a broad temperature range (273–313 K), the material consistently demonstrates complete exclusion of CF4 while maintaining stable NF3 uptake (Fig. 2B). A moderate temperature decrease from 298 K to 273 K at 100 kPa does not significantly increase CF4 adsorption capacity, but significantly enhances NF3 adsorption capacity to 51.1 cm3 g−1, representing an increase of approximately 36.6% compared to the uptake at 298 K (Fig. 2C).
image file: d5sc04966k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Molecular sieving and thermodynamic analysis of NF3/CF4 separation in CALF-20. (A) The NF3 and CF4 adsorption isotherms of CALF-20 at 298 K. (B) The NF3 and CF4 adsorption isotherms of CALF-20 at different temperatures. (C) Adsorption capacity of CALF-20 for NF3 and CF4 at 100 kPa and different temperatures. (D) NF3 uptakes and NF3/CF4 uptake ratio comparison with some reported materials at 298 K and 100 kPa. (E) Isosteric heats of adsorption (Qst) of NF3. (F) The calculated NF3 Qst of CALF-20 and other reported materials.

CALF-20 exhibits an exceptional NF3/CF4 adsorption ratio of 41.1 at 298 K (Fig. 2D), significantly surpassing all the previously reported porous materials including ATC-Cu (1.46),29 HKUST-1 (1.18),20 Cu(peba)2 (1.07),20 Ni(pba)2 (0.83),20 Ni-MOF (0.91),20 NH2–Ni-MOF (1.08),20 Co3(HCOO)6 (1.03),30 Ni3(HCOO)6 (1.33),30 Mn3(HCOO)6 (1.84)30 and SBMOF-1 (1.16).31 This outstanding separation performance is of great significance in the field of fluorocarbon separation, as it can potentially revolutionize the industrial separation processes of NF3/CF4 mixtures, reducing energy consumption and improving separation efficiency. This remarkable enhancement in separation performance demonstrates the unique molecular sieving capability of CALF-20 for NF3/CF4 mixtures. While other MOFs show adsorption ratios clustered near the vapor–liquid equilibrium prediction (∼1.25), CALF-20 achieves a 28-fold improvement over the previous best performer (ATC-Cu), establishing new benchmarks for fluorocarbon separations. The superior performance originates from the precisely tuned pore structure of CALF-20. This pore structure enables complete exclusion of CF4 while maintaining an effective NF3 adsorption capacity. The isosteric heat of adsorption (Qst) for NF3 in CALF-20 was determined to be 27.5 kJ mol−1 at zero coverage (Fig. 2E), calculated from gas adsorption isotherms over 273–313 K. This intermediate binding strength represents an optimal balance for practical applications: sufficiently strong to ensure effective NF3 capture at ambient conditions, yet weak enough to permit energy-efficient regeneration (Fig. 2F). Compared with other materials, this unique adsorption energy characteristic endows CALF-20 with distinct advantages in terms of adsorption efficiency and regeneration performance, which is crucial for its large-scale industrial application.

Diffusion barriers and host–guest interactions of NF3/CF4 in CALF-20

Minimum energy path (MEP) calculations reveal fundamentally different diffusion mechanisms for NF3 and CF4 during adsorption in the channels of CALF-20. The energy profile shows that NF3 encounters a moderate activation barrier of 65.6 kJ mol−1 at the channel bottleneck (position-6, Fig. 3A and B), while CF4 faces a substantially higher barrier of 111.7 kJ mol−1 (position-5, Fig. 3D and E) – consistent with its larger kinetic diameter (4.8 Å vs. 4.5 Å for NF3). Furthermore, an analysis of host–guest interaction distances reveals that CF4 exhibits stronger interactions (H⋯F: 2.60–3.69 Å) compared to NF3 (H⋯F: 2.64–4.03 Å) (Fig. S5), which underscores the steric hindrance associated with its molecular structure.
image file: d5sc04966k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 DFT calculations. Energy profiles for NF3 (A) and CF4 (D) diffusion in CALF-20; molecular configuration at the positions with maximum energy for NF3 (B and C) and CF4 (E and F) in CALF-20.

Synergistic analysis of breakthrough experiments and in situ infrared spectroscopy

The separation mechanism is synergistically verified by combining the macroscopic separation performance from breakthrough experiments with the microscopic interaction mechanism revealed by in situ infrared spectroscopy. In order to evaluate the separation capabilities of CALF-20 for NF3/CF4 mixtures, we conducted dynamic breakthrough experiments at a temperature of 298 K utilizing an equimolar (50/50, v/v) NF3/CF4 gas mixture. The gas was introduced at a flow rate of 6 mL min−1 through a packed column filled with the activated adsorbent. Breakthrough experiments reveal instantaneous CF4 permeation (retention time = 1.3 min g−1) versus strong NF3 retention (5.3 min g−1) in CALF-20, demonstrating its molecular sieving selectivity for NF3/CF4 separations (Fig. 4A). Five consecutive breakthrough cycles demonstrate the stable NF3/CF4 separation performance of CALF-20. The retention times are nearly identical, which confirms the recyclability of CALF-20 for industrial gas purification (Fig. 4B). Temperature-dependent breakthrough measurements reveal enhanced NF3/CF4 separation at 273 K and 283 K, with NF3 retention time increasing by 52% and 96% (from 5.3 to 8.1 and 10.2 min g−1) while maintaining the instantaneous permeation of CF4, indicating that reducing the temperature appropriately will not significantly increase energy consumption, but will significantly enhance the separation performance of NF3/CF4 (Fig. 4C). Regeneration studies at 298 K using He purge gas (6 mL min−1) revealed distinct desorption kinetics where CF4 was rapidly eluted, while NF3 exhibited prolonged retention. This directly demonstrates that CALF-20 had a stronger affinity for NF3 at room temperature (Fig. 4D). To investigate the interaction mechanism between NF3 and CALF-20, we employed in situ FTIR spectrum to monitor real-time vibrational changes during NF3 adsorption. Within the 2000–800 cm−1 range, the FTIR spectrum exhibited only the N–F asymmetric stretching vibration of NF3 at 910 cm−1 (Fig. 4E). In situ FTIR spectroscopy of NF3 adsorbed in CALF-20 exhibited an unshifted N–F asymmetric stretching vibration at 910 cm−1 (Fig. 4F), which is identical to the infrared resonance peak reported in the references for pure NF3 gas measurements.32 This observation suggests that the interaction between NF3 and CALF-20 is weak and primarily governed by physisorption. Besides, the 3D DRIFTS spectra recorded during desorption (Fig. S6) showed a symmetric decrease in the 910 cm−1 band intensity, mirroring the adsorption profile and confirming the reversibility of NF3 uptake—an essential attribute for practical PSA applications. This reversibility, coupled with the sustained framework integrity (no new peaks or shifts in XRD patterns during multiple adsorption–desorption cycles), further underscores the structural stability of CALF-20 under operational conditions.
image file: d5sc04966k-f4.tif
Fig. 4 The breakthrough performance and in situ infrared spectroscopy of CALF-20. (A) The NF3/CF4 breakthrough curve of CALF-20 at 298 K (adsorption condition: NF3/CF4 v/v 50/50 with the flow rate of 6 mL min−1). (B) Five cycles of column breakthrough experiments. (C) The NF3/CF4 breakthrough curves of CALF-20 at different temperatures. (D) Desorption curves by He purge with the flow rate of 6 mL min−1 at 298 K. (E) In situ 3D DRIFTS spectral mapping of 1% NF3 adsorption on CALF-20 from 0–60 min. (F) In situ DRIFTS mapping showing localized N–F bond perturbations (910 cm−1).

Combining the different diffusion energy barriers obtained from our DFT calculations (65.6 kJ mol−1 vs. 111.7 kJ mol−1) and breakthrough data demonstrating high NF3/CF4 selectivity, we conclude that molecular sieving in CALF-20 is governed primarily by sieving rather than differential adsorption affinity. The retention of the vibrational signature of NF3 further confirms the structural stability of the framework during NF3 gas uptake.

Conclusion

In summary, CALF-20, a metal–organic framework with precisely engineered 4.8 Å pores, has emerged as a breakthrough solution for the separation of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) and carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) in semiconductor manufacturing. This material achieves an NF3/CF4 uptake ratio of 41.1 and can produce CF4 with a purity of >99.5% through breakthrough experiments at 298 K, setting a new benchmark for fluorocarbon separation. The unique pore structure of CALF-20 enables selective molecular sieving of NF3 (kinetic diameter: 4.5 Å) while effectively excluding CF4 (4.8 Å), as confirmed by structural characterization and computational studies. The remarkable stability and recyclability of the framework over multiple adsorption cycles, combined with its mild regeneration conditions and scalable synthesis, position it as a practical and cost-effective choice for industrial gas purification. This work not only addresses a critical environmental and economic challenge in the semiconductor industry but also provides a model for developing advanced porous materials that can achieve high selectivity and stability for challenging gas separations. By providing a viable way for the energy-efficient recovery of electronic special gases, CALF-20 supports the transition of the semiconductor sector to sustainable practices and the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Author contributions

Q.-Y. Y. initiated and supervised the research. Q.-Y. Y. and Y.-T. L. designed the project and experiments. Y.-T. L. performed the adsorbents preparation and gas adsorption experiments. L.W.L. and L.X.X performed the simulated calculations. Y.-Y. G., T.-Y. Z. and N. G. performed in-situ infrared spectroscopy measurements. Q.-Q. G. provided financial support for the study. L.-P. Z., L. X., S.-M. W., and Q.-Y. Y. discussed the experimental results and provided valuable suggestions. Y.-T. L. wrote the manuscript. Q.-Y. Y. performed manuscript edits and revisions. All authors contribute to the final manuscript and the interpretation of the results.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

Additional details regarding the experimental and calculation data are given in the SI, including in situ infrared purging data in Fig. S1−S6 and Table S1 and S2. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc04966k.

Acknowledgements

Y.-T. L. and W. L. L. contributed equally to this work. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22371221) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 2021044) and Beijing Nova Program (2024072).

References

  1. E. Schmidt, AI, great power competition & national security, Daedalus, 2022, 151, 288–298 CrossRef.
  2. S. Raoux, T. Tanaka, M. Bhan, H. Ponnekanti, M. Seamons, T. Deacon, L.-Q. Xia, F. Pham, D. Silvetti and D. Cheung, Remote microwave plasma source for cleaning chemical vapor deposition chambers: Technology for reducing global warming gas emissions, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 1999, 17, 477–485 CrossRef CAS.
  3. M. B. Chang and J.-S. Chang, Abatement of PFCs from semiconductor manufacturing processes by nonthermal plasma technologies: A critical review, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2006, 45, 4101–4109 CrossRef CAS.
  4. R. Joeri, L. David, C. Brian and R. Keywan, emissions levels required to limit warmint to below 2°C, Nat. Clim. Change, 2020, 3, 405–412 Search PubMed.
  5. M. J. Prather and J. Hsu, NF3, the greenhouse gas missing from Kyoto, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2008, 35, L12810 CrossRef.
  6. B. A. Wofford, M. W. Jackson, C. Hartz and J. W. Bevan, Surface wave plasma abatement of CHF3 and CF4 containing semiconductor process emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1999, 33, 1892–1897 CrossRef CAS.
  7. H. S. Kim, E. Y. Kim and P. S. Lee, Study of the enrichment of NF3 waste gas using zeolite and polymeric membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2019, 220, 1–7 CrossRef CAS.
  8. P. Purohit and L. Höglund-Isaksson, Global emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases 2005–2050 with abatement potentials and costs, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2017, 17, 2795–2816 CrossRef CAS.
  9. K. M. Stanley, D. Say, J. Mühle, C. M. Harth, P. B. Krummel, D. Young, S. J. O'Doherty, P. K. Salameh, P. G. Simmonds and R. F. Weiss, Increase in global emissions of HFC-23 despite near-total expected reductions, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 397 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. C. Y. Chuah, Y. Lee and T.-H. Bae, Potential of adsorbents and membranes for SF6 capture and recovery: A review, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 404, 126577 CrossRef CAS.
  11. C.-F. O. Yang, S.-H. Kam, C.-H. Liu, J. Tzou and J.-L. Wang, Assessment of removal efficiency of perfluorocompounds (PFCs) in a semiconductor fabrication plant by gas chromatography, Chemosphere, 2009, 76, 1273–1277 CrossRef PubMed.
  12. S. Singh, F. H. Tezel and P. J. Harlick, Adsorption of tetrafluoromethane and nitrogen by various adsorbents, Sep. Sci. Technol., 2002, 37, 2763–2784 CrossRef CAS.
  13. W. Fu, J. Wang, Y. Shi, Y. Li, Z. Sui, L. Wang, Y. Wang and X. Xu, One-step self-activated carbon adsorbent with synergistic micropore-mesopore structure for exceptional SF6/N2 separation performance, Carbon, 2025, 232, 119839 CrossRef CAS.
  14. W. Fu, J. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Sui and X. Xu, Investigation on the pore structure-performance relationship of porous carbon adsorbents for SF6/N2 separation via fine pore modulation, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2024, 348, 127788 CrossRef CAS.
  15. Y. Shi, J. Wang, W. Fu, Y. Li, Z. Sui and X. Xu, In-situ activated carbon adsorbents with tailored pore structures for efficient SF6 capture and high-purity recovery, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2025, 360, 130978 CrossRef CAS.
  16. J. Li, Y. Chen, T. Ke, Y. Jin, R. Fan, G. Xu, L. Yang, Z. Zhang, Z. Bao, Q. Ren and Q. Yang, Efficient continuous SF6/N2 separation using low-cost and robust metal-organic frameworks composites, Nat. Commun., 2025, 16, 632 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. S. M. Wang, X. T. Mu, H. R. Liu, S. T. Zheng and Q. Y. Yang, Pore-structure control in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for capture of the greenhouse gas SF6 with record separation, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2022, 134, e202207066 CrossRef.
  18. F. Shahzad, Y. B. Zaied, M. A. Shahzad and F. Mahmood, Insights into the performance of green supply chain in the Chinese semiconductor industry, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2024, 273, 109286 CrossRef.
  19. K. Adil, Y. Belmabkhout, R. S. Pillai, A. Cadiau, P. M. Bhatt, A. H. Assen, G. Maurin and M. Eddaoudi, Gas/vapour separation using ultra-microporous metal–organic frameworks: insights into the structure/separation relationship, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 3402–3430 RSC.
  20. S.-M. Wang, H.-L. Lan, G.-W. Guan and Q.-Y. Yang, Amino-functionalized microporous MOFs for capturing greenhouse gases CF4 and NF3 with record selectivity, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, 14, 40072–40081 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. S.-M. Wang, Q. Zhang, Y.-T. Li, S.-C. Liu and Q.-Y. Yang, Destructive Adsorption of Nitrogen Trifluoride (NF3) Using M-MOF-74 with Open Metal Sites, Chem Bio Eng., 2024, 1, 535–540 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. M.-T. Huang and P.-M. Zhai, Achieving Paris Agreement temperature goals requires carbon neutrality by middle century with far-reaching transitions in the whole society, Adv. Clim. Change Res., 2021, 12, 281–286 CrossRef.
  23. J.-B. Lin, T. T. Nguyen, R. Vaidhyanathan, J. Burner, J. M. Taylor, H. Durekova, F. Akhtar, R. K. Mah, O. Ghaffari-Nik and S. Marx, A scalable metal-organic framework as a durable physisorbent for carbon dioxide capture, Science, 2021, 374, 1464–1469 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. X. Peng, L. Zhao, Y.-L. Peng, C. Deng, Y. H. Andaloussi, H. Pan, Y.-J. Tian, J.-S. Zou, R. Krishna, B. Liu, C. Deng, P. Xiao, C. Sun, M. J. Zaworotko, G. Chen and Z. Zhang, One-Step Ethylene Purification from a Seven-Component Cracking Gas Mixture with Sorbent-Sorbate Induced-Fit, CCS Chem., 2025, 7, 1054–1066 CrossRef CAS.
  25. X. Wang, T. Zhao, Y. Cai, Y. Zheng, Y. Chen and J. Gao, Reversed CO2/C2H2 separation with ultrahigh carbon dioxide adsorption capacity in Zn-based pillared metal-organic frameworks, J. Solid State Chem., 2023, 327, 124280 CrossRef CAS.
  26. T. Wu, C. Yu, R. Krishna, Z. Qiu, H. Pan, P. Zhang, X. Suo, L. Yang, X. Cui and H. Xing, Porous materials with suitable pore size and dual-functional sites for benchmark one-step ethylene purification, AIChE J., 2024, 70, e18312 CrossRef CAS.
  27. Y.-T. Li, W. Li, L.-P. Zhang, L. Xu, S. Ni, Y. Jiang, X. Li and Q.-Y. Yang, Zinc-Based flexible coordination network for precise butane isomer sieving and low-carbon alkane recovery from oilfield associated gas, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2025, 363, 132018 CrossRef CAS.
  28. Y. T. Li, W. Li, L. P. Zhang, S. Ni, Y. Jiang, X. Li and Q. Y. Yang, Wide Temperature Sieving of n-Butene and iso-Butene by a Zinc-Based Coordination Network with Record Separation, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2025, 35, 2411951 CrossRef CAS.
  29. Z.-W. Fan, Y. Wang, J. Liu, Z.-T. Cheng, C. Wang and Z. Niu, Metal–Organic Framework-Based NF3 Nanotrap for the Separation of NF3 and CF4, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2024, 17, 2349–2354 CrossRef PubMed.
  30. Y. Wu, T. Yan, W. Zhang, S. Chen, Y. Fu, Z. Zhang and H. Ma, Adsorption interface-induced H⋯F charge transfer in ultramicroporous metal–organic frameworks for perfluorinated gas separation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2022, 61, 13603–13611 CrossRef CAS.
  31. Y. Wu, S. Wang, W. Zhang, S. Chen, Z. Zhang, B. Yang, S. Li and H. Ma, Enhancing perfluorinated electron specialty gases separation selectivity in ultra-microporous metal organic framework, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2022, 289, 120739 CrossRef CAS.
  32. A. Guber and U. Köhler, FTIR spectroscopy for the analysis of selected exhaust gas flows in silicon technology, J. Mol. Struct., 1995, 348, 209–212 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Y. T. Li and W. L. Li contributed equally to this work.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.