Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: LC-MS/MS characterization of pirtobrutinib impurities and product degradation: stability studies

Modachakanahally K. Pavithraa, Chaya G.a, Hemavathi N. Deepakumari*ab, Hosakere D. Revanasiddappac, Salah Jasim Mohammedd, Hasan Sh. Majdie, Abdullah H. Alsabhanf and Shareefraza J. Ukkundg
aDepartment of Chemistry, Bharathi College, Bharathinagara, Mandya 571 422, Karnataka, India. E-mail: pavithramk664@gmail.com; chayaguruswamy97@gmail.com
bDepartment of Chemistry, Regional Institute of Education (NCERT), Bhubaneswar 751022, Odisha, India. E-mail: deepakumari_22@yahoo.com
cDepartment of Chemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru 570 006, Karnataka, India. E-mail: hdrevanasiddappa@yahoo.com
dCivil Engineering Department, Dijlah University College, Baghdad 00964, Iraq. E-mail: salah.jasmin@duc.edu.iq
eDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Petroleum Industries, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Babylon 51001, Iraq. E-mail: mn13022020@gmail.com
fDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: aalsabhan@ksu.edu.sa
gDepartment of Biotechnology, P.A. College of Engineering, Mangalore 574153, India. E-mail: drshareef2022@gmail.com

Received 10th October 2025 , Accepted 10th October 2025

First published on 20th October 2025


Abstract

Correction for ‘LC-MS/MS characterization of pirtobrutinib impurities and product degradation: stability studies’ by Modachakanahally K. Pavithra et al., RSC Adv., 2024, 14, 34868–34882, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA06299J.


The authors regret an error in Table 4 in the original article. In the original article, the data values for ‘Amount found (mg)’ and ‘% Recovery’ were reported incorrectly. A corrected Table 4 is displayed below.
Table 4 Accuracy results of pirtobrutinib (n = 5) through HPLC technique
Concentration (at specification level) Area Amount added (mg) Amount found (mg) % Recovery Mean % recovery
50% 1[thin space (1/6-em)]684[thin space (1/6-em)]579 50.00 50.3 100.6 100.8
1[thin space (1/6-em)]679[thin space (1/6-em)]845 50.00 50.2 100.4
1[thin space (1/6-em)]695[thin space (1/6-em)]483 50.00 50.7 101.4
100% 3[thin space (1/6-em)]348[thin space (1/6-em)]458 100.00 100.1 100.1 100.3
3[thin space (1/6-em)]357[thin space (1/6-em)]376 100.00 100.4 100.4
3[thin space (1/6-em)]347[thin space (1/6-em)]302 100.00 100.3 100.3
150% 5[thin space (1/6-em)]019[thin space (1/6-em)]771 150.00 150.4 100.3 100.9
5[thin space (1/6-em)]092[thin space (1/6-em)]322 150.00 152.1 101.4
5[thin space (1/6-em)]066[thin space (1/6-em)]740 150.00 151.8 101.2


The authors sincerely apologise for this oversight. The conclusions of this article are not affected by these changes.

An independent expert has reviewed the corrected information and deemed that a Correction is appropriate in this case.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.