Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

An improved and convenient new synthesis of the pheromone components of the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta

Shuai Yanga, Yan Caia and Zhiwei Miao*ab
aState Key Laboratory and Institute of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 300071, P. R. China. E-mail: miaozhiwei@nankai.edu.cn
bDepartment of Ecological and Resources Engineering, Fujian Key Laboratory of Eco-Industrial Green Technology, Wuyi University, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, P. R. China

Received 13th August 2025 , Accepted 7th November 2025

First published on 13th November 2025


Abstract

A C6 + C4 + C4 regiodivergent synthesis of (3E,8Z,11Z)-3,8,11-tetradecatrienyl acetate (1) and (3E,8Z)-3,8-tetradecadienyl acetate (2), the major and minor sex pheromone components of the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta, has been developed. The route employs alkylation of THP-protected 4-bromo-1-butanol followed by Wittig reactions, enabling preparation of each pheromone in seven steps (longest linear sequence).


Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is an economically important crop cultivated worldwide, yet it is highly susceptible to insect damage. Among the most destructive pests in Brazil and other South American countries is Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). This insect infests tomato plants at all growth stages, from seedlings to mature plants, and can cause yield losses of up to 100%.1 Chemical control has been the primary management strategy, but its effectiveness is limited due to the pest's concealed feeding habits and rapid development of insecticide resistance.2 Environmentally sustainable alternatives are therefore urgently needed.

No environmentally acceptable control methods are currently available for this pest. Blanket applications of conventional insecticides, the most common approach, are largely ineffective because larvae feed within leaves, stems, and fruit, where they are protected from contact sprays.3 Continuous pesticide use further promotes the development of resistant populations.4 Moreover, pesticide residues can accumulate in the food web, posing risks to non-target organisms, including humans. An alternative control strategy informed by the chemical ecology of T. absoluta is therefore highly desirable.

Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies are increasingly applied to control T. absoluta.5 Pheromone-based control is particularly promising, as female moths release potent sex pheromones that attract conspecific males. In 1995, Attygalle identified the major pheromone component as (3E,8Z,11Z)-3,8,11-tetradecatrienyl acetate (1) and reported its first synthesis.6 The minor component was later identified as (3E,8Z)-3,8-tetradecadienyl acetate (2) (Fig. 1).7 Field trials confirmed that the pheromone blend strongly attracts males, and mating disruption using the major component alone is as effective as chemical control.8


image file: d5ra05956a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Structure of (3E,8Z,11Z)-3,8,11-tetradecatrienyl acetate (1) and (3E,8Z)-3,8-tetradecadienyl acetate (2).

Previous synthetic strategies have primarily varied in the site of key bond formation. In the C5 + C5 + C4 approach (Scheme 1a),6,9 the C4–C5 bond was constructed via alkylation of THP-protected 3-butyn-1-ol under n-BuLi conditions. In the C4 + C1 + C9 strategy,10 a Li2CuCl4-catalyzed coupling between a Grignard reagent and an allylic substrate forms the C5–C6 bond. More recently, a C6 + C2 + C6 route based on the Wittig reaction has been reported (Scheme 1c).11 This approach begins from hexane-1,6-diol, proceeding via a Knoevenagel condensation to form the C2–C3 bond, followed by a Wittig reaction to establish the C8–C9 bond.


image file: d5ra05956a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 A brief outline of the previous syntheses of 1 and 2.

In the C8 + C1 + C5 strategy, exo-2-hydroxyethyl-substituted cyclopropanol was employed as the starting material to construct an aldehyde bearing an eight-carbon backbone. Through a Corey–Fuchs transformation followed by a sequence of copper(I)-mediated coupling reactions between two alkynes, the C8–C9 (sp–sp) and C9–C10 (sp–sp3) linkages were successfully established (Scheme 1d).12 In the C6 + C4 + C4 strategy, the C8–C9 (sp–sp) bond was formed via a Wittig reaction, while the C4–C5 bond was constructed by alkylation of THP-protected 3-butyn-1-ol with an eight-carbon intermediate (Scheme 1e).13 In the C6 + C5 + C3 strategy, a combination of Wittig reaction and cross-metathesis (CM) effectively shortened the synthetic sequence for two pheromones, although purification was complicated by the formation of stereoisomeric byproducts (Scheme 1f).14

Reported syntheses of these two pheromones typically require more than ten steps. Given the severe threat posed by the pest, the strong biological activity of its pheromones, and the limited availability of these compounds, there is a clear need for a more efficient and economical synthesis from readily available materials. Here, we report a concise and efficient synthesis of pheromones 1 and 2 of Tuta absoluta. The strategy employs a convergent sequence, with formation of the C8–C9 bond as the key step via a Wittig reaction.

Retrosynthetic analysis indicates that pheromones 1 and 2 can be assembled from the eight-carbon fragment (E)-8-oxooct-3-enyl acetate (10) and the appropriate Wittig reagents (12 or 11, respectively). Synthesis of fragment 10 is achieved via alkylation of alcohol 3 followed by oxidation (Scheme 2).


image file: d5ra05956a-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Retrosynthetic analysis of pheromone 1 and 2.

Following the synthetic plan, pheromones 1 and 2 were prepared from commercially available 4-bromo-1-butanol (3). Alkylation of its THP-protected derivative (4) afforded compound 6. Reduction of 6 with LiAlH4 in diglyme at 140 °C for 14 h yielded the E-olefin 7 in 76% yield. Attempts to replace the THP protecting group with TBDPS were unsuccessful due to instability under the reduction conditions. Olefin 7 was then acetylated and deprotected to furnish alcohol 9a in a Z/E ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]27. Oxidation of 9a with DMP afforded aldehyde 10, which underwent Wittig reaction with phosphate salt 11 to produce diene pheromone 2 (14% total yield), or with phosphate salt 12 to give triene pheromone 1 (14% total yield) (Scheme 3). The NMR spectra of synthetic pheromones 1 and 2 matched the reported values, thus confirming the double-bond configuration.9


image file: d5ra05956a-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Syntheses of pheromone 1 and 2.

To quantify the stereoisomer 9b present in 9a, 9b was independently synthesized. Starting from alkyne alcohol 13, TBDPS protection afforded intermediate 14. Deprotonation with n-BuLi generated the terminal alkyne anion, which was quenched with excess ethylene oxide to yield alcohol 15 in 44% yield. Subsequent hydrogenation, acetylation, and deprotection furnished alcohol 9b (Scheme 4).


image file: d5ra05956a-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Synthesis of (Z)-8-hydroxyoct-3-en-1-yl acetate (9b).

Cross-metathesis (CM) has recently been applied to the synthesis of various insect pheromones, including those of Lepidoptera, Tenebrio molitor, and Aromia bungii.15 To simplify the synthesis of 9a, we explored an olefin cross-metathesis route as a protecting-group-free strategy (Scheme 5). However, the reaction between 18 and 19 showed limited efficiency. The major products were (Z)-8-hydroxyoct-3-en-1-yl acetate (9b) and two homologues with one fewer carbon (9c and 9d).16 The formation of 9c and 9d is likely initiated by isomerization of 18 and 19 to 20 and 21, respectively, followed by cross-metathesis to produce 9c and 9d (Scheme 6).17


image file: d5ra05956a-s5.tif
Scheme 5 Synthesis of (E)-8-hydroxyoct-3-en-1-yl acetate (9a) by olefin cross-metathesis.

image file: d5ra05956a-s6.tif
Scheme 6 Proposed pathway of the generation of 9c and 9d.

Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a regiodivergent synthesis of insect pheromones 1 and 2 using a C6 + C4 + C4 strategy. Alkylation of THP-protected 4-bromo-1-butanol with 3-butyn-1-ol constructed the C4–C5 bond, and a Wittig reaction formed the C8–C9 double bond. Each pheromone was obtained in seven steps (overall eight operations), representing the shortest syntheses to date of pheromone 1 (14% total yield) and pheromone 2 (14% total yield). An alternative protecting-group-free approach to 9a via olefin cross-metathesis was also explored, though separation was complicated by byproducts 9b, 9c, and 9d. Further optimization of this route is ongoing.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information: experimental details, additional experimental results, characterization data, and copies of NMR spectra for all new products (in PDF format). See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra05956a.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for financial supports from NSFC (22071113) and the Committee of Science and Technology of Tianjin (24JCYBJC01960).

Notes and references

  1. (a) A. Dominguez, M. Puigmartí, M. P. Bosch, G. Rosell, R. Crehuet, A. Ortiz, C. Quero and A. Guerrero, Synthesis, Functional Assays, Electrophysiological Activity, and Field Tests of Pheromone Antagonists of the Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2016, 64, 3523–3532 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. Biondi, R. N. C. Guedes, F.-H. Wan and N. Desneux, Ecology, Worldwide Spread, and Management of the Invasive South American Tomato Pinworm, Tuta absoluta: Past, Present, and Future, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 2018, 63, 239–258 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. E. Moore, Control of tomato leafminer (Scrobipalpula absoluta) in Bolivia, Trop. Pest Manag., 1983, 29, 231–238 CrossRef; (d) F. N. P. Haji, L. C. L. Freire, F. G. Roa, C. N. da Silva, M. M. Souza Junior and M. I. V. da Silva, Manejo integrado de Scrobipalpuloides absoluta (Povolny) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) no submédio São Francisco, An. Soc. Entomol. Bras., 1995, 24, 587–591 CrossRef.
  2. (a) R. K. D. Peterson, R. S. Davis, L. G. Higley and O. A. Fernandes, Mortality Risk in Insects, Environ. Entomol., 2009, 38, 2–10 CrossRef PubMed; (b) M. G. Luna, V. I. Wada, J. L. Salle and N. E. Sánchez, Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a Newly Recorded Parasitoid of the Tomato Moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), in Argentina, Neotrop. Entomol., 2011, 40, 412–414 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) A. Joshi, R. B. Thapa and D. Kalauni, Integrated Management of South American Tomato Leaf Miner [Tuta Absoluta (Meyrick)]: A Review, J. Plant Prot., 2018, 5, 70–86 CrossRef.
  3. M. M. M. Lietti, E. Botto and R. A. Alzogaray, Insecticide resistance in Argentine populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Neotrop. Entomol., 2005, 34, 113–119 CrossRef.
  4. H. Á. A. Siqueira, R. N. C. Guedes and M. C. Picanço, Insecticide resistance in populations of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Agric. For. Entomol., 2000, 2, 147–153 CrossRef.
  5. (a) M. Barzman, P. Bàrberi, A. N. E. Birch, P. Boonekamp, S. Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, B. Graf, B. Hommel, J. E. Jensen, J. Kiss, P. Kudsk, J. R. Lamichhane, A. Messéan, A.-C. Moonen, A. Ratnadass, P. Ricci, J.-L. Sarah and M. Sattin, Eight principles of integrated pest management, Agron. Sustainable Dev., 2015, 35, 1199–1215 CrossRef; (b) L. E. Ehler, Integrated pest management (IPM): definition, historical development and implementation, and the other IPM, Pest Manage. Sci., 2006, 62, 787–789 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. A. B. Attygalle, G. N. Jham, A. Svatoš, R. T. S. Frighetto, J. Meinwald, E. F. Vilela, F. A. Ferrara and M. A. Uchôa-Fernandes, Microscale, random reduction: Application to the characterization of (3E,8Z,11Z)-3,8,11-tetradecatrienyl acetate, a new lepidopteran sex pheromone, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 5471–5474 CrossRef CAS.
  7. F. C. Griepink, T. A. van Beek, M. A. Posthumus, A. de Groot, J. Hans Visser and S. Voerman, Identification of the sex pheromone of Scrobipalpula absoluta; determination of double bond positions in triple unsaturated straight chain molecules by means of dimethyl disulphide derivatization, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 411–414 CrossRef CAS.
  8. N. Desneux, E. Wajnberg, K. A. G. Wyckhuys, G. Burgio, S. Arpaia, C. A. Narváez-Vasquez, J. González-Cabrera, D. Catalán Ruescas, E. Tabone, J. Frandon, J. Pizzol, C. Poncet, T. Cabello and A. Urbaneja, Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control, J. Pest. Sci., 2010, 83, 197–215 CrossRef.
  9. (a) A. B. Attygalle, G. N. Jham, A. Svatoš, R. T. S. Frighetto, F. A. Ferrara, E. F. Vilela, M. A. Uchôa-Fernandes and J. Meinwald, (3E,8Z,11Z)-3,8,11-Tetradecatrienyl acetate, major sex pheromone component of the tomato pest Scrobipalpuloides absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1996, 4, 305–314 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. Puigmartí, M. P. Bosch and A. Guerrero, An Improved and Convenient New Synthesis of the Pheromone Components of the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta, Synthesis, 2015, 47, 961–968 CrossRef.
  10. (a) J. A. Cabezas, A new and efficient synthesis of (3E,8Z,11Z)-tetradeca-3,8,11-trienyl acetate, the major sex pheromone component of the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta, Tetrahedron Lett., 2019, 60, 407–410 CrossRef CAS; (b) G. Eric, G. Loic and G. Olivier, WO2022171965, 2022; (c) Y. J. Yu, Q. H. Cheng and L. Y. Dian, CN116693389A, 2023.
  11. (a) K. Dong, Q. Zhu, F. Liu, Y. Zhang and Y. Tao, Concise synthesis of (3E,8Z,11Z)-tetradeca-3,8,11-trienyl acetate and (3E,8Z)-tetradeca-3,8-dienyl acetate, both sex pheromone components of the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta, Tetrahedron Lett., 2022, 107, 153928 CrossRef CAS; (b) Y. H. Tao, K. W. Dong, Q. Zhu, Y. G. Zhang and Y. S. Zhang, CN115417769A, 2022.
  12. D. M. Zubrytski, D. G. Kananovich and E. A. Matiushenkov, Preparation of stereochemically pure E- and Z-alkenoic acids and their methyl esters from bicyclo[n.1.0]alkan-1-ols. Application in the synthesis of insect pheromones, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2017, 53(6), 813–823 CrossRef CAS.
  13. Y. Du, Y. Li, H. Guo, Y. Dong, Q. Shi and Z. Du, CN119552076A, 2025.
  14. (a) Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Tirupati, IN202541011805A, 2025; (b) Z. W. Miao, S. Yang, Y. Cai, X. B. Ma and X. Z. Xu, CN119735506A, 2025.
  15. (a) J. Morvan, T. McBride, I. Curbet, S. Colombel-Rouen, T. Roisnel, C. Crévisy, D. L. Browne and M. Mauduit, Continuous Flow Z-Stereoselective Olefin Metathesis: Development and Applications in the Synthesis of Pheromones and Macrocyclic Odorant Molecules, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 19685–19690 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S.-X. L. Luo, J. S. Cannon, B. L. H. Taylor, K. M. Engle, K. N. Houk and R. H. Grubbs, Z-Selective Cross-Metathesis and Homodimerization of 3E-1,3-Dienes: Reaction Optimization, Computational Analysis, and Synthetic Applications, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 14039–14046 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) M. B. Herbert, V. M. Marx, R. L. Pederson and R. H. Grubbs, Concise Syntheses of Insect Pheromones Using Z-Selective Cross Metathesis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 310–314 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) K. Mori, Pheromone synthesis, Part 263: Synthesis of the racemate and the enantiomers of (E)-cis-6,7-epoxy-2-nonenal, the male-produced pheromone of the red-necked longhorn beetle, Aromia bungii, Tetrahedron, 2018, 74, 1444–1448 CrossRef CAS; (e) J. P. A. Souza, P. T. Bandeira, J. Bergmann and P. H. G. Zarbin, Recent advances in the synthesis of insect pheromones: an overview from 2013 to 2022, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2023, 40, 866–889 RSC.
  16. R. Awalekar, P. Mohire, A. Patravale, S. Salunkhe, S. Usmani, D. Jamale, S. Hangirgekar, G. Kolekar and P. Anbhule, Total Stereospecific Synthesis of (3E,7Z)-Tetradecadienyl Acetate, the Major Sex Pheromone Component of the Potato Pest Symmetrischema tangolias, Chem. Nat. Compd., 2021, 57, 1000–1004 CrossRef CAS.
  17. S. H. Hong, D. P. Sanders, C. W. Lee and R. H. Grubbs, Prevention of Undesirable Isomerization during Olefin Metathesis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17160–17161 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.