Afsar Khana,
Hong Rana,
Chen Saisaia,
Nisar Muhammada,
Adnan Abbasa,
Zhang Yia,
Faheem Shah*b,
Weihua Chen*c and
Dayong Xu*a
aSchool of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, 241000, China. E-mail: xdy826@ahpu.edu.cn
bDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Eastern Province AlAhsa-31982, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: fshah@kfu.edu.sa
cSchool of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, 334000, China. E-mail: chenweihua419818@sina.com
First published on 8th August 2025
The catalytic conversion of aniline into azo compounds represents a significant and versatile route in synthetic organic chemistry, with applications spanning dyes, pharmaceuticals, and functional materials. This comprehensive review systematically examines recent advances in catalytic strategies for azo bond formation from aniline derivatives, encompassing homogeneous, heterogeneous, enzymatic, and photo-redox catalysis. Key mechanistic pathways, including oxidative coupling, dehydrogenative aromatization, and redox processes, are critically analyzed. The influence of catalyst design (e.g., transition metals, organo-catalysts, nanomaterials) and reaction conditions (solvent, oxidants, temperature) on selectivity and efficiency is discussed. Additionally, the review highlights sustainable approaches, such as aerobic oxidation and visible-light-driven catalysis, aligning with green chemistry principles. Challenges, including substrate scope limitations and scalability, are addressed, along with emerging trends and future prospects for industrial and academic applications. This work aims to serve as a foundational resource for researchers exploring catalytic azo compound synthesis.
Transition metal catalysts8 offer a promising option for industrial-scale production of azo compounds due to their low cost and high efficiency.9,10 Furthermore, various strategies, including element doping, structural recombination, crystal plane orientation growth and morphology regulation, can be employed to optimize these catalysts for azo compounds synthesis.11,12 Metal nanoparticles and metal supported nanoparticles effectively used for azo compounds synthesis.2 To enhance catalytic efficiency, researchers have developed sophisticated design strategies for metal nano particles, focusing on controlling particle size and shape, modifying electronic properties, and optimizing metal–support interactions.13,14 The support material significantly influences the catalytic performance of metal nanoparticles for azo compounds synthesis, particularly at the metal–support interface where active sites are located.4 However, these active sites are relatively few, limiting overall catalytic activity. Furthermore, the metal–support interaction can weaken during reactions, leading to aggregation of active metal species and reduced performance.12
Research has shown that incorporating alkali metals into catalysts can significantly enhance their electron transfer properties, leading to improved catalytic conversion of aromatic amines into azo compounds.15 Alkali metals offer advantages over transition metals, including higher charge density, stronger bonding with functional groups, and being lightweight and non-toxic. These benefits make alkali metal incorporation an attractive approach for enhancing catalytic performance.16
Gold catalysts have recently gained significant attention in organic synthesis due to their versatility and effectiveness. Recent studies, particularly those focusing on gold–support interactions, have enabled practical applications of gold catalysts.6 Notably, Grirrane et al.6 reported that Au/TiO2 and Au/CeO2 nanocatalysts demonstrated high conversion and selectivity for aniline to azo compound synthesis using O2 as the oxidant. Zhu et al.12 demonstrated the use of Au/ZrO2 catalyst in a photocatalytic reaction, achieving high conversion of nitro compounds under atmospheric pressure. Research has shown that the performance of gold catalysts can be enhanced by selecting suitable supports and controlling gold nanoparticle size. Despite this progress, achieving both high conversion and high selectivity in the oxidation of aniline to azoxy compounds remains a significant challenge in supported metal catalysis systems. Li et al.17 found that modifying ZrO2 with Fe altered its crystal structure and increased the number of surface acidic and basic sites, enhancing the activation of methanol and CO2. Similarly, introducing Fe into Cu-based catalysts for dimethyl carbonate formation improved catalytic activity due to a balanced distribution of acidic and basic sites, attributed to the combined effects of metallic Cu, Fe species, and oxygen-deficient Fe2O3.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Mesoporous manganese oxide catalyzed aerobic oxidative coupling of anilines to aromatic azo compounds.18 |
The widespread use of solvents in organic synthesis contributes to environmental issues, making solvent-free reactions a desirable goal. Researchers have developed a method using copper acetate and a trace amount of palladium salt enables the efficient conversion of anilines to aromatic azo compounds under base- and solvent-free conditions. This approach also achieved satisfactory yields in cross-coupling reactions.19 Copper played a fundamental role in the catalytic process, aided by palladium salt and oxygen. This method offers a new way for synthesizing asymmetric and symmetric azo compounds and highlights the potential of transition metal compounds in catalysis (Fig. 2).
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Oxidation coupling of aniline to form azo compounds.19 |
Maier et al.20 developed a new method for synthesizing cyclic azo benzenes from diarylamine precursors, overcoming challenges related to steric hindrance and angular tension. The reaction utilized m-CPBA as the oxidant in a mixed solvent system of acetic acid and dichloromethane. The synthesis of cyclic azo-benzenes offers a new type of photo-molecular switch. However, the method has limitations, including reduced yields for diarylamines with strong electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups, and the need for additional derivatization steps for amino-substituted diarylamines. Furthermore, the reaction can generate multiple by-products and shows limited substrate selectivity, with substituent electronic properties having a weak impact on product yields. Direct oxidation of aromatic amines to form azo compounds necessitates precise control of the oxidation level to minimize the formation of by-products such as nitrobenzene and azobenzene oxide.
Shukla et al.21 developed a Cu–CeO2 nanoparticle catalyst that achieved high yields and selectivity for azo compounds using H2O2 as the oxidant and acetonitrile as the solvent. Under optimized conditions, the catalyst delivered 95% aniline conversion and 92% azobenzene selectivity. Notably, the catalyst showed stability and heterogeneity, with minimal changes in Cu and Ce content after use. While significant progress has been made in synthesizing aromatic azo compounds, constructing heteroaromatic azo derivatives remains underexplored.
Jiang et al.22 introduced a novel method for synthesizing azo compounds through iodination of pyrazol-5-amine, utilizing t-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) as the oxidant and a copper salt as the catalyst. This approach enables the simultaneous formation of C–I and N–N bonds, followed by oxidative dehydrogenation to produce azopyrroles and iodo-substituted azopyrroles with diverse substituents. The reaction conditions are mild, and the catalytic system allows for selective modification of the pyrrole skeleton. However, the low yield in derivatization reactions needs optimization for practical applications. The direct oxidation of aromatic amines to synthesize azo compounds offers several advantages, but over-oxidation can lead to the formation of unwanted by-products.
Mondal et al.23 developed a method to prepare Au nanoparticles using a nanoscale organic cage as a template, contributing to this area of research. The cage-immobilized Au nanoparticles serve as a heterogeneous catalyst for selectively reducing nitroaromatics to azo compounds using 2-propanol, achieving high yields at room temperature. Under optimized conditions, 99% conversion to the corresponding azo compounds was obtained after 2 hours of UV irradiation in an inert atmosphere. Notably, no reaction occurred without Au nanoparticles, highlighting their crucial role in the process.
Yan et al.24 developed a method where Pd(OAc)2 was reduced in situ by NaBH4 to form ultra-fine Pd nanoclusters (PdNCs), which were stabilized by nitroaromatics and dispersed in solvent. These PdNCs catalyzed the selective reduction of nitroarenes to various products with high yields, including those with electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups. The protocol also worked well for nitro-fused aromatic compounds like nitronaphthalene, achieving an 80% yield. However, the reaction's selectivity needs improvement due to the potential oxidation of hydroxylamine, which can lead to side reactions. Further optimization of reaction conditions is necessary.
Hexagonal boron nitride is a 2D material with thermal stability and low toxicity making it suitable for catalytic applications (Fig. 3). It provides a platform for metal nanoparticles, offering more reactive sites. Research has shown that h-BN can inhibit oxygen activation, allowing catalytic hydrogenation of nitrobenzene in air. In a reaction mechanism, KOH facilitates hydrogen transfer from isopropanol to the Au/BN surface, forming an activated H donor. The H donor binds to Au nanoparticles, creating H–Au, which plays a crucial role in the reduction process. The H–Au species can also release H2, enabling a continuous cycle.25
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 The reduction of nitrobenzene catalyzed by Au/BN.25 |
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 Photochemical reduction of nitrobenzene catalyzed by Pd@CdS.26 |
Wang et al.27 developed a CQDs-ZnIn2S4 nano-catalyst for the controlled catalytic hydrogenation of nitrobenzene under visible light. By adjusting the hydrogen source, and alkalinity the reaction can selectively produce azobenzene, azoxybenzene, or aniline. The mechanism involves ZnIn2S4 generating electrons and holes under light irradiation, with CQDs transferring electrons to facilitate the hydrogenation process. The addition of bases like NaOH promotes the formation of azobenzene or azoxybenzene. While photocatalytic synthesis offers many benefits, it still faces challenges like limited solar energy utilization, low quantum efficiency, and inadequate catalyst recyclability.
Rowshanpour et al.28 reported the first instance of photo-dual catalytic Cu/photosensitizer synthesis of symmetric and non-symmetric azo compounds from readily available amines using renewable light energy input, ambient conditions, and ubiquitous air as a stoichiometric oxidant (Fig. 5).
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 (a) Light on/off experiment to track chain propagation. Blue columns represent the time period in which the light was on. The conversion data points were recorded using 1H NMR in the span of 4.5 hours. (b) Reaction was run using hydrazine instead of aniline as the starting reagent in the absence of blue light.28 |
Jiang et al.19 developed a straightforward approach for synthesizing both symmetric and asymmetric aromatic azo compounds directly from anilines, employing Cu(OAc)2 as a catalyst under base-free and solvent-free conditions. The introduction of a small amount of palladium salt further enhanced the reaction yield. This approach also showed promise for cross-coupling nitridation reactions.
Wang et al.30 developed a method for synthesizing azo-benzenes through the oxidative coupling of anilines using transition metal oxides, with manganese oxide OMS-2 showing the best activity and selectivity. They synthesized various symmetric and unsymmetric azo-benzenes with high conversion and selectivity rates. The selectivity of unsymmetric azo-benzenes was influenced by the difference in Hammett constants between the substituent groups. Research suggested that surface defect sites on the manganese oxide facilitate electron transfer and oxygen activation, proposing a single-electron transfer reaction mechanism based on detailed characterization.
Patel et al.31 reported a method using a polyoxometalate-based molecular molybdenum oxide catalyst to oxidize anilines to azobenzene and azoxybenzene compounds. This approach is compatible with a wide range of substrates and functional groups, allowing for the efficient synthesis of symmetric and asymmetric azo-benzenes and azoxybenzenes using H2O2 as a green oxidant. Mechanistic studies suggest the formation of highly active Mo imido complexes as intermediates.
Singh et al.3 developed a method for selectively oxidizing aromatic amines to azoxy derivatives using aluminum and gallium oxide nanorod catalysts. Gallium oxide nanorods, with their small size and high surface area, showed exceptional performance, achieving 94% aniline conversion with 98% selectivity to azoxybenzene. Notably, this reaction used hydrogen peroxide as a green oxidant and did not require transition metal catalysts. The catalyst also demonstrated excellent reusability, retaining its activity and selectivity over multiple runs. The detail mechanism is given in Fig. 6.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 Mechanism of aniline conversion to azo compounds over aluminium and gallium oxide catalysts at various conditions.3 |
Patel et al.31 reported a direct oxidative azo coupling of anilines using a self-assembled, flower-like CuCo2O4 catalyst under aerobic conditions. The catalyst was synthesized via the oxalate decomposition method and characterized using raman spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The flower-like CuCo2O4 demonstrated excellent catalytic performance for the direct aerobic oxidative azo coupling of anilines under additive- and oxidant-free conditions. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations provided mechanistic insights, revealing that atmospheric oxygen preferentially adsorbs and dissociates at the Cu sites, while aniline dissociation occurs at the Co sites. This cooperative interaction between Cu and Co sites facilitates the selective activation of both oxygen and aniline during the reaction. The catalyst was recyclable and maintained high catalytic activity over at least eight consecutive cycles.
Shukla et al.21 reported the catalytic oxidation of aromatic amines to azoxy compounds using a Cu–CeO2 catalyst and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as the oxidant. The catalyst was synthesized via a one-pot hydrothermal method employing cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a surfactant, resulting in Cu nanoparticles supported on nanocrystalline CeO2. Characterization techniques including XRD, SEM, TEM, XPS, TPR, EXAFS, BET surface area analysis, and UV-vis spectroscopy confirmed the successful formation and morphology of the catalyst. The catalyst exhibited excellent activity and selectivity for the oxidation of aromatic amines to their corresponding N-oxides. Optimal performance was observed with a Cu loading of 3.8 wt%, which yielded 5–10 nm Cu nanoparticles supported on 20–40 nm CeO2 particles. At this loading, the catalyst achieved 95% aniline conversion and 92% selectivity for azoxybenzene. Higher Cu loadings led to agglomeration of Cu species, resulting in decreased catalytic efficiency. The study also systematically examined the influence of various reaction parameters, including temperature, reaction time, substrate type, and H2O2 molar ratio.
Oseghale et al.32 reported the development of a bifunctional Cs–Au/Co3O4 catalyst, possessing both basic and redox properties, for the oxidative synthesis of aromatic azo compounds from anilines (Fig. 7). This eco-friendly, alkali-promoted catalyst enabled the oxidative dehydrogenative coupling of anilines to produce both symmetrical and unsymmetrical azo compounds using air as the oxidant, eliminating the need for base additives or toxic molecular oxygen. The catalyst demonstrated good reusability and operated efficiently under mild conditions. Enhanced catalytic performance was attributed to a higher concentration of basic sites, lower reduction in temperatures, and the active role of lattice oxygen in the nanostructure. The increased basicity promoted electron density on the active Au species, significantly boosting the yield of aromatic azo products.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 Mechanism involved oxidation of aniline into symmetrical and unsymmetrical azo compounds.32 |
Dutta et al.18 established a straightforward, economical, and mild catalytic method for synthesizing a broad spectrum of symmetrical and unsymmetrical aromatic azo compounds using inexpensive meso-MnOx materials. A variety of aniline derivatives underwent both oxidative homocoupling and cross-coupling reactions, yielding products in moderate to excellent yields (35–99%). The use of air as the terminal oxidant, the absence of precious metals or additives, operation under ambient conditions, and good catalyst reusability highlight the advantages of this system over existing methods. Mechanistic studies revealed the key roles of surface-active Mn3+ species, labile lattice oxygen, and radical intermediates in the reaction cycle. A manganese-mediated electron-transfer mechanism was proposed and supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Further studies are ongoing to refine the mechanism and enhance reaction efficiency.
Khan et al.1 reported the development of a Rb-doped Au/CeO2 nanocatalyst that demonstrated exceptional efficiency for the selective oxidation of anilines to azocompounds using hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant. The catalyst achieved complete aniline conversion (100%) and remarkably high selectivity (92%) toward azoxybenzene. The incorporation of Rb+ was found to promote electron transfer, enhancing the formation of catalytically active Au+ species. A DFT calculation is done to probe in the exact interaction mechanism of the catalyst surface and product produced (Fig. 8). Table 1 shows various catalytic activities at various conditions.
![]() | ||
Fig. 8 (a) Side view of Au/CeO2 (100) adsorption fields (b) top view of Au/CeO2 (100) adsorption fields (c) side view and (d) top view of Au/CeO2 (100) most stable adsorption site (e) side view and (f) top view of Rb doped Au/CeO2 (100) adsorption fields (g) side view and (h) top view of Rb doped Au/CeO2 (100) most stable adsorption site (i) proposed mechanism of the reaction.1 |
Catalyst | Conversion (%) | Selectivity | Solvent | T (°C) | Time (h) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.5% CuCeO2 | 82 | 72 | CH3CN | 50 | 6 | 7 |
Al2O3-nanopowder | 14 | 38 | EtOAc | 80 | 4 | 3 |
Ga2O3-NR | 49 | 92 | EtOAc | 80 | 4 | 3 |
Ag/Fe2O3 nanocatalyst | 91 | 92 | CH3CN | 50 | 8 | 33 |
Nb2O5-scCO2 | 86 | 79 | EtOH | 25 | 1 | 34 |
Nb-doped iron oxides | 33 | 59 | EtOH | 25 | 24 | 35 |
Al2O3/AlNbO4 | 80 | 82.7 | DMF | 25 | 24 | 36 |
Khan et al.2 also reported a Rb-promoted Fe/CeO2 nanocatalyst to investigate the role of Rb as a promoter in enhancing the catalytic performance for the selective oxidation of aniline to azoxybenzene using H2O2 as the oxidant. The optimized catalyst, Rb- Fe/CeO2, achieved complete aniline conversion (100%) with 91% selectivity toward azoxybenzene. The incorporation of Rb significantly improved the catalyst's electron transfer capability, reduced activation energy, and induced lattice distortion, leading to the formation of oxygen vacancies and Ce3+ species key contributors to the enhanced catalytic activity. Additionally, Rb modification helped suppress strong Brønsted acid sites, stabilized the Fe/CeO2 structure, improved Fe dispersion, and created an electron-rich environment that facilitated substrate activation. These synergistic effects increased the basic strength and electron density of the active Fe species, compensating for their inherent electronic limitations and resulting in improved catalytic efficiency. Reaction parameters such as catalyst loading (20–100 mg), reaction time (2–24 h), temperature (25–100 °C), solvent type, and volume (0.5–2 mL) were systematically studied in a 50 mL round-bottom flask with reflux conditions. DFT calculation (Fig. 9) has been done to determine interactions between substrate and catalyst surface.2
![]() | ||
Fig. 9 Optimized structures of the CeO2 (a), Fe/CeO2 (b), Rb- Fe/CeO2 (c) supercells. Red, yellow, blue, and fuchsia correspond to oxygen, cerium, iron, and rubidium atoms, respectively. The solid black line confines the supercell.2 |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |