Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Photoinduced cobaloxime catalysis enabled dehydrogenative C2-phosphinylation of bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes to access phosphorylated cyclobutenes

Yunong Chang, Fangyu Bian, Jiefei Guo, Miao-Miao Li* and Wei Ding*
Division of Molecular Catalysis and Synthesis, Henan Institute of Advanced Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P. R. China. E-mail: miaomiaoli116@zzu.edu.cn; ding_w@zzu.edu.cn

Received 26th May 2025 , Accepted 3rd July 2025

First published on 10th July 2025


Abstract

A photoinduced ring-opening radical C2-phosphinylation of bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes with secondary phosphine oxides by cobaloxime catalysis is described. This reaction features mild conditions, wide substrate scope, and high site-selectivities, producing a diverse range of phosphorylated cyclobutenes in good yields with hydrogen evolution. The mechanism studies indicate that this reaction likely proceeds through a bicyclo[1.1.0]butane isomerization and dehydrogenative allylic phosphinylation process.


Introduction

Cyclobutenes are important frameworks commonly found in natural products and pharmaceutical compounds with a wide range of biological properties (Scheme 1a),1 as well as versatile building blocks in organic synthesis.2 Consequently, the construction of these scaffolds has attracted substantial interest, and remarkable advancements have been made.3 However, the scope of the vast majority of known methods is limited to specialized starting materials. In recent years, bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes (BCBs), the smallest fused carbocycles, have gained increasing attention as highly reactive substrates due to their inherent significant ring strain (66 kcal mol−1) and high π-characters of the central C1–C3 σ bond.4 A series of ring-opening reactions of BCBs, including hydrofunctionalization,5 difunctionalization,6 and cycloaddition,7 are widely utilized for the concise and efficient synthesis of the functionalized cyclobutane derivatives and substituted aryl bioisosteres (Scheme 1b). In contrast, the selective preparations of cyclobutenes from BCBs have yet to be extensively developed and mainly afford C1-functionalized products.8 Particularly, to our knowledge, no reaction to synthesize C2-functionalized cyclobutenes from BCBs has been reported to date.9
image file: d5ra03697f-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Ring-opening reactions of BCBs to synthesize cyclobutenes.

Biomimetic excited-cobaloxime catalysis, initially developed to mimic the reaction of vitamin B12,10 has emerged as a powerful tool for organic synthesis. In 2019, Wu and co-workers originally developed a direct activation of H-phosphine oxide by photoinduced cobaloxime catalysis to afford a reactive phosphinoyl radical.11a Since then, various dehydrogenative radical phosphorylation reactions of unsaturated compounds were realized to afford valuable alkenylphosphine oxides and phosphorylated heteroaromatics.11 Recently, our group has also used this strategy to achieve allylic phosphinylation of alkenes and allylamines with hydrogen evolution, in which the cobaloxime complex performed a double duty as both a photoredox catalyst and hydrogen evolution metal catalyst.11g,h On the other hand, organocobalt(III) complexs were able to catalyze the ring-opening isomerization of BCBs.12 Inspired by these remarkable works and our ongoing interest in photochemical synthesis,13 we envisaged that [CoIII]–H species, conveniently accessible from photoinduced cobaloxime catalysis,11 could promote the regioselective isomerization of BCBs through a reversible addition–elimination process to access cyclobutene intermediates.14 The following photoinduced cobaloxime-catalyzed dehydrogenative allylic phosphinylation of cyclobutenes would afford C2-phosphorylated cyclobutenes (Scheme 1c). This reaction would feature mild reaction conditions, good site-selectivity and high atom economy with H2 as the byproduct. During the preparation of this manuscript, Deng and Liu reported an elegant similar transformation of 1,3-disubstituted BCBs, which gave different regioselectivities of products, compared with the present reaction.15

Results and discussion

We initially chose BCB amide 1a and diphenylphosphine oxide 2a as model substrates to investigate the feasibility of our hypothesis. After extensive screening of the reaction conditions (Table 1; see Tables S1–S9 in the ESI), we succeeded in the desired ring-opening C2-phosphinylation reaction in the presence of Co(dmgH)2(4-CO2Mepy)Cl (10 mol%) as catalyst and pyridine (1.0 equiv.) as base in DCE under irradiation of 40 W blue LEDs at room temperature, affording the phosphorylated cyclobutene product 3aa in 89% isolated yield with exclusive regioselectivity (entry 1). Moreover, the hydrogen gas was detected by GC-TCD during the reaction (see Fig. S4 in the ESI). Control experiments indicated that cobalt catalyst and visible light were both essential for this reaction, while base significantly improved the reaction efficiency (entries 2−4). Then, a variety of cobaloxime catalysts were examined. The Co(III) complexes were capable of catalyzing this transformation with comparable reaction efficiencies (entries 5–6, also see Table S1 in ESI), particularly, the cobaloxime catalysts with different pyridine ligands had no dramatic effect on the product yields, which was probably caused by the ligand exchange process of cobaloxime complex with base pyridine. When using Co(dmgH)2(4-CO2Mepy)Cl as catalyst, the reaction gave a slightly increased yield. Therefore, Co(dmgH)2(4-CO2Mepy)Cl was chose as the optimized catalyst. However, the use of the Co(II)-catalyst Co(dmgBF2)2(H2O)2 led to a significant drop in the yield of 3aa (entry 7). In addition, the use of other inorganic and organic bases instead of pyridine, such as K2CO3, Et3N and DBU, resulted in diminished yields (entries 8–10). Furthermore, no improvement in yield was observed upon alteration of solvents (entries 11–13).
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditionsa

image file: d5ra03697f-u1.tif

Entry Variation to standard conditions Yieldb (%)
a Unless otherwise noted, the reaction conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), 2a (0.2 mmol), Co(dmgH)2(4-CO2Mepy)Cl (10 mol%), pyridine (1.0 equiv), DCE (4.0 mL), irradiation via a 40 W blue LEDs (450 nm) under Ar at room temperature for 24 h.b Isolated yield.
1 None 89
2 No Co(dmgH)2(4-CO2Mepy)Cl 0
3 No blue LEDs 0
4 No pyridine 43
5 Co(dmgH)(dmgH2)Cl2 as the catalyst 82
6 Co(dmgH)2pyCl as the catalyst 79
7 Co(dmgBF2)2(H2O)2 as the catalyst 15
8 K2CO3 instead of pyridine 40
9 Et3N instead of pyridine 23
10 DBU instead of pyridine 29
11 DCM instead of DCE 76
12 Toluene instead of DCE 54
13 MeCN instead of DCE 47


Having established the optimal reaction conditions, we then explored the substrate scope of this photoinduced ring-opening phosphinylation reaction. As illustrated in Table 2, a wide variety of N-aryl-N-alkyl BCB amides with different substituents smoothly took part in the reaction to afford the desired products 3ba–3ja in 68−94% yields, which indicated that the electronic properties and steric hindrance of substrates had no much effect on the reaction efficiencies. The acyclic and cyclic N,N-dialkyl BCB amides were also amenable to this transformation to provide the corresponding products 3ka–3oa in good yields. Moreover, the relatively unstable Weinreb amide substituted BCB was well compatible with this reaction to deliver the product 3pa in 86% yield. Noteworthy, the reaction could tolerate other kinds of BCBs, including BCB esters and BCB phenyl sulfone, producing the desired products 3qa–3sa in excellent yields, whereas BCB ketones failed to participate in this protocol due to the competitive Michael addition of diphenylphosphine oxide to α,β-unsaturated ketone intermediate. Next, the scope of the secondary phosphine oxide was investigated with BCB 1a as the reaction partner. A variety of monosubstituted and disubstituted diarylphosphine oxides smoothly participated in the reaction to provide the phosphorylated cyclobutene products 3ab–3ah in 44−86% yields. The heterocycle-substituted phosphine oxides were also suitable substrates to deliver the corresponding products 3ai and 3aj in 75% and 82% yields, respectively. Furthermore, the asymmetric alkylphenylphosphine oxides could undergo this transformation smoothly to afford the desired products 3ak and 3al in good yields. Notably, the model reaction could be carried out on a 2 mmol scale with no decrease in the yield (89% yield), and the structure of product 3aa was unambiguously determined by X-ray crystallographic analysis (CCDC 2422929).

Table 2 Substrate scopea
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), 2 (0.2 mmol), Co(dmgH)2(4-CO2Mepy)Cl (10 mol%), pyridine (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), DCE (4.0 mL), irradiation via a 40 W blue LEDs (450 nm) under Ar at room temperature for 24 h.b The reaction was performed on a 2.0 mmol scale for 72 h.
image file: d5ra03697f-u2.tif


To gain some insights into the reaction mechanism, several mechanistic experiments were conducted (Scheme 2). First, we probed the reaction intermediates with 10 mol% of diphenylphosphine oxide 2a, in which the ring-opening isomerization product 4a of BCB 1a was isolated in 88% yield with exclusive site-selectivity (Scheme 2a). Control experiments showed that 2a, cobaloxime and visible light were indispensable in the conversion of BCB 1a to intermediate 4a. Meanwhile, the reaction of cyclobutene 4a and 2a under standard conditions afforded product 3aa in 67% yield, which suggested the cyclobutene 4a was probably the key intermediate of this reaction (Scheme 2b). In addition, the radical trapping experiments with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl (TEMPO) and 2-methyl-2-nitrosopropane (MNP) gave a complete suppression of the ring-opening phosphinylation reaction, while the radical adducts 5 and 6 were obtained in 5% and 72% yields, respectively, which indicated that the reaction might proceed through a phosphorus radical pathway (Scheme 2c).


image file: d5ra03697f-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Mechanistic investigations. (a and b) Exploration of cyclobutene intermediate, (c) radical trapping experiments.

Based on the above results and related literatures,11–15 we proposed a plausible mechanism for this transformation (Scheme 3). First, the [CoIII]–H complex, which was conveniently generated in the initial photoinduced cobaloxime-catalyzed radical phosphinylation process (Scheme 2a),13d could promote BCB isomerization to produce the cyclobutene intermediate 4. The regioselectivity of this step is distinct from Deng and Liu's work,15 which may be attributed to the different BCB substrates. Meanwhile, the photoexcited [CoIII] complex (E(CoIII*/CoII) = +2.2 V vs. SCE)11a,c oxidized H-phosphine oxide 2 (Eox = +1.22 V vs. SCE for 2a)11c with the facilitation of a base to form the phosphinoyl radical I and [CoII] species. Then, the regioselective addition of radical I to cyclobutene 4 afforded carbon radical intermediate II. The subsequent hydrogen atom abstraction by the [CoII] species generated the phosphinylation product 3 and [CoIII]–H complex. Finally, the [CoIII]–H complex reacted with a proton to release H2 with the regeneration of the [CoIII] catalyst.


image file: d5ra03697f-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Proposed reaction mechanism.

The phosphorylated cyclobutene products obtained by the present reaction could be used as versatile building blocks for diverse further transformations (Scheme 4). The reduction of the C–C double bond of cyclobutene product 3aa with a catalytic amount of Pd/C under a hydrogen gas atmosphere afforded cyclobutane 7 in good yield with excellent diastereoselectivity. In addition, epoxidation of the olefin moiety in 3aa with mCPBA could be occurred smoothly to provide fused-cyclic compound 8 in 49% yield with exclusive diastereoselectivity. To our delight, simultaneous reduction of phosphoryl and amide groups in 3aa was achieved using Ti(Oi-Pr)4 and (EtO)3SiH to afford phosphine compound 9 in 53% yield. Furthermore, the phosphine oxide group could be selectively reduced by PhSiH3 to give trivalent phosphine intermediate, following by the oxidation with elemental sulfur and selenium to obtain phosphine sulfide 10 and phosphine selenide 11 in 69% and 61% yields, respectively.


image file: d5ra03697f-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Synthetic applications.

Conclusions

In summary, we developed a ring-opening C2-phosphinylation of BCBs with secondary phosphine oxides by visible-light-induced cobaloxime catalysis. This reaction features a wide substrate scope to produce a diverse range of phosphorylated cyclobutenes in good yields with H2 as the byproduct. The preliminary mechanism studies revealed a BCB isomerization and dehydrogenative allylic phosphinylation process in this approach.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.

Author contributions

W. Ding and M.-M. Li conceived the idea and supervised the project. Y. Chang, F. Bian and J. Guo designed and conducted all experiments and analysed the data. W. Ding and Y. Chang wrote the manuscript with the input from all authors.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22201265, 22201264) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M710133, 2022TQ0287) for the financial support.

References

  1. (a) N. Fokialakis, P. Magiatis, A. Terzis, F. Tillequin and A.-L. Skaltsounis, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 5323 CrossRef CAS; (b) A. Misale, S. Niyomchon and N. Maulide, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 2444 CrossRef CAS; (c) D. Didier and F. Reiners, Chem. Rec., 2021, 21, 1144 CrossRef CAS.
  2. (a) N. Gauvry, C. Lescop and F. Huet, Eur. J. Org Chem., 2006, 2006, 5207 CrossRef; (b) J. Chen, Q. Zhou, H. Fang and P. Lu, Chin. J. Chem., 2022, 40, 1346 CrossRef CAS; (c) D. Egea-Arrebola, F. W. Goetzke and S. P. Fletcher, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202217381 CrossRef CAS.
  3. (a) Y. Xu, M. L. Conner and M. K. Brown, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 11918 CrossRef CAS; (b) M. Eisold, A. N. Baumann, G. M. Kiefl, S. T. Emmerling and D. Didier, Chem.–Eur. J., 2017, 23, 1634 CrossRef CAS; (c) Q.-B. Zhang, F. Li, B. Pan, L. Yu and X.-G. Yue, Chem.–Eur. J., 2024, 30, e202401501 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) F. Hu, Y. Zhao, L. Che, X. Yan and Y. Xia, ChemCatChem, 2024, 16, e202301249 CrossRef CAS.
  4. (a) M. M. D. Pramanik, H. Qian, W.-J. Xiao and J.-R. Chen, Org. Chem. Front., 2020, 7, 2531 RSC; (b) X. Liu, J. He, K. Lin, X. Wang and H. Cao, Org. Chem. Front., 2024, 11, 6942 RSC; (c) Q.-B. Zhang, F. Li, B. Pan, S. Zhang, X.-G. Yue and Q. Liu, Green Chem., 2024, 26, 11083 RSC; (d) X. Zhou, Y. Hu, Y. Huang and Y. Xiong, Chem. Commun., 2025, 61, 23 RSC.
  5. (a) A. Guin, S. Bhattacharjee, M. S. Harariya and A. T. Biju, Chem. Sci., 2023, 14, 6585 RSC; (b) G. Chen, D. Tian, X. Wang and H.-J. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 14928 CrossRef CAS.
  6. (a) Y. Duan, Y. Xu, Y. Li, L. Mao, J. Feng, R. Zhang, W. Tang, T. Lu, Y. Chen and J. Feng, Green Chem., 2024, 26, 5512 RSC; (b) T. Singha, N. A. Bapat, S. K. Mishra and D. P. Hari, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 6396 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) Y.-W. Sun, J.-H. Zhao, X.-Y. Yan, C.-L. Ji, H. Feng and D.-W. Gao, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 10810 CrossRef; (d) P. Yang, T. Brockmann and X.-F. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2024, 60, 13048 RSC; (e) C. Yang, M. Hu, C. Hu, X. Mi and S. Luo, Chem.–Eur. J., 2024, 30, e202402965 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. (a) C. C. Chintawar, R. Laskar, D. Rana, F. Schäfer, N. Van Wyngaerden, S. Dutta, C. G. Daniliuc and F. Glorius, Nat. Catal., 2024, 7, 1232 CrossRef CAS; (b) S. Dutta, C. G. Daniliuc, C. Mück-Lichtenfeld and A. Studer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 27204 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J.-L. Zhou, Y. Xiao, L. He, X.-Y. Gao, X.-C. Yang, W.-B. Wu, G. Wang, J. Zhang and J.-J. Feng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 19621 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) J.-J. Wang, L. Tang, Y. Xiao, W.-B. Wu, G. Wang and J.-J. Feng, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202405222 CrossRef CAS; (e) Y. Xiao, F. Wu, L. Tang, X. Zhang, M. Wei, G. Wang and J.-J. Feng, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202408578 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) Z. Fu, J. Cheng, X.-X. Li, X. Li and S. Yu, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 9961 CrossRef CAS; (g) K. Dhake, K. J. Woelk, L. D. N. Krueckl, F. Alberts, J. Mutter, M. O. Pohl, G. T. Thomas, M. Sharma, J. Bjornerud-Brown, N. P. Fernández, N. D. Schley and D. C. Leitch, Chem. Commun., 2024, 60, 13008 RSC; (h) S. Deswal, A. Guin and A. T. Biju, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202408610 CrossRef CAS; (i) Q.-Q. Hu, L.-Y. Wang, X.-H. Chen, Z.-X. Geng, J. Chen and L. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202405781 CrossRef CAS; (j) S. Hu, Y. Pan, D. Ni and L. Deng, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 6128 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (k) S. Nicolai and J. Waser, Chem. Sci., 2024, 15, 10823 RSC; (l) E. F. Plachinski, R. Z. Qian, R. Villanueva, D. L. Poole, T. Rosenthal and T. P. Yoon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 31400 CrossRef CAS; (m) T. Qin, M. He and W. Zi, Nat. Synth., 2024, 4, 124 CrossRef; (n) Y. Liang, R. Nematswerani, C. G. Daniliuc and F. Glorius, Chem. Commun., 2025, 61, 2091 RSC; (o) S. Dutta, C. G. Daniliuc, C. Mück-Lichtenfeld and A. Studer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 4249 CrossRef CAS; (p) K. Zhang, Z. Gao, Y. Xia, P. Li, P. Gao, X.-H. Duan and L.-N. Guo, Chem. Sci., 2025, 16, 1411 RSC; (q) H. Wu, M. Sun, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Yang and G. Zhu, Org. Chem. Front., 2025, 12, 1951 RSC; (r) T. Yu, X. Zhao, Z. Nie, L. Qin, Z. Ding, L. Xu and P. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202420831 CrossRef CAS.
  8. (a) K. Dhake, K. J. Woelk, J. Becica, A. Un, S. E. Jenny and D. C. Leitch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202204719 CrossRef CAS; (b) Y. Xiao, T.-T. Xu, J.-L. Zhou, F. Wu, L. Tang, R.-Y. Liu, W.-B. Wu and J.-J. Feng, Chem. Sci., 2023, 14, 13060 RSC; (c) A. Dasgupta, S. Bhattacharjee, Z. Tong, A. Guin, R. E. McNamee, K. E. Christensen, A. T. Biju and E. A. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 146, 1196 CrossRef; (d) S.-L. Lin, Y.-H. Chen, H.-H. Liu, S.-H. Xiang and B. Tan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 21152 CrossRef CAS; (e) W. Wang, J.-A. Xiao, L. Zheng, W.-J. Liang, L. Yang, X.-X. Huang, C. Lin, K. Chen, W. Su and H. Yang, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 10645 CrossRef CAS; (f) D. Bai, X. Guo, X. Wang, W. Xu, R. Cheng, D. Wei, Y. Lan and J. Chang, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 2833 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) F. Chen, Y. Duan, Y. Guo, Y. Liu, M. Lang, J. Peng and S. Peng, Org. Chem. Front., 2025, 12, 1815 RSC.
  9. (a) R. E. McNamee, A. L. Thompson and E. A. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 21246 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Y. Liang, R. Kleinmans, C. G. Daniliuc and F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 20207 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) F. Zhang, S. Dutta, A. Petti, D. Rana, C. G. Daniliuc and F. Glorius, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2025, 63, e202418239 Search PubMed.
  10. (a) G. N. Schrauzer, Acc. Chem. Res., 1968, 1, 97 CrossRef CAS; (b) M. Giedyk, K. Goliszewska and D. Gryko, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 3391 RSC; (c) K. C. Cartwright, A. M. Davies and J. A. Tunge, Eur. J. Org Chem., 2020, 2020, 1245 CrossRef CAS; (d) P. Dam, K. Zuo, L. M. Azofra and O. El-Sepelgy, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202405775 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) A. Pal, S. De and A. Thakur, Chem.–Eur. J., 2025, 31, e202403667 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. (a) W.-Q. Liu, T. Lei, S. Zhou, X.-L. Yang, J. Li, B. Chen, J. Sivaguru, C.-H. Tung and L.-Z. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 13941 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. Lei, G. Liang, Y.-Y. Cheng, B. Chen, C.-H. Tung and L.-Z. Wu, Org. Lett., 2020, 22, 5385 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J.-X. Yu, Y.-Y. Cheng, B. Chen, C.-H. Tung and L.-Z. Wu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202209293 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) A. Shao, J. Chen, L. Wang, M. Yi, H. Yang, Y. Zhang, S. Fan, S. Chen, H. Wu and R. Shi, Org. Chem. Front., 2022, 9, 4379 RSC; (e) W. Shan, Z. Wang, C. Gao, X. Li, W. Zhuang, R. Liu, C. Shi, H. Qin, X. Li and D. Shi, Green Chem., 2024, 26, 9749 RSC; (f) J.-X. Yu, Y.-Y. Cheng, X.-Y. Zeng, B. Chen, C.-H. Tung and L.-Z. Wu, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 6809 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) J. Guo, Y. Zhang, M.-M. Li, A. Zhang, H. Yang, H. Min and W. Ding, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 10176 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) A. Zhang, M.-M. Li, L. Guo, H. Yang, J. Guo, D. Xu and W. Ding, Org. Chem. Front., 2025, 12, 148 RSC.
  12. (a) S. Miki, S.-I. Matsumura, T. Ohno and Z.-I. Yoshida, Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 3669 CrossRef CAS; (b) M. Ociepa, A. J. Wierzba, J. Turkowska and D. Gryko, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 5355 CrossRef CAS; (c) B. Mao, S.-H. Jiang, Z. Xiong, Y. Wei and M. Shi, Org. Chem. Front., 2025, 12, 1958 RSC.
  13. (a) X. Mao, M.-M. Li, P. Wang, Q. Cao, W. Zhou and W. Ding, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 1265 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Q. Cao, M.-M. Li, X. Mao, Q.-Q. Zhou and W. Ding, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 4678 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. Guo, Y. Zhang, M.-M. Li, A. Zhang, H. Yang, H. Min and W. Ding, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 10176 CrossRef CAS; (d) A. Zhang, M.-M. Li, L. Guo, H. Yang, J. Guo, D. Xu and W. Ding, Org. Chem. Front., 2025, 12, 148 RSC; (e) H. Yang, M.-M. Li, A. Zhang, J. Guo, Y. Yu and W. Ding, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2025, 36, 110425 CrossRef CAS; (f) Y. Chen, X. Mao, M.-M. Li and W. Ding, J. Org. Chem., 2025, 90, 3391 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. (a) Z. Zhang and V. Gevorgyan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 20875 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) P. Yang, Y.-H. Zhao, T. Brockmann, Y.-K. Liu and X.-F. Wu, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci., 2025, 6, 102346 CrossRef CAS.
  15. P.-F. Chen, M.-Y. Dong, C.-Y. Han, D.-S. Li, Y. Hong, F. Xue, F. Liu and H.-P. Deng, Org. Lett., 2025, 27, 898 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Procedures, characterization of compounds, crystallographic data (CCDC 2422929) and other electronic format. CCDC 2422929. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra03697f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.