Bin Wua,
Qingyu Zhanga,
Hongyu Liua,
Tongtong Zhang
a,
Xiaolong Yanga and
Fangming Zhu
*ab
aGDHPPC Lab, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
bKey Lab for Polymer Composite and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China. E-mail: ceszfm@mail.sysu.edu.cn
First published on 7th April 2025
Novel half-titanocene catalysts containing fluorinated phenoxy ligands were synthesized and used for the syndiotactic polymerization of styrene in the presence of low methylaluminoxane (MAO) and triisobutylaluminum (TIBA) as cocatalysts. The influences of polymerization conditions, including temperature and Al/Ti ratio, on polymerization behaviour and the molecular weight of the resultant polymer were studied. The fluorinated half-titanocene catalysts displayed higher catalytic activity and produced syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) with a higher molecular weight as a result of the electron-withdrawing conjugation effect of fluorinated phenoxy ligands. This effect stabilizes Ti(III) active centers and/or enhances propagation while reducing the chain transfer rate constant.
After nearly four decades of exploration, researchers found that the catalytic activity of CpTiL3 activated by MAO, as well as the molecular weight (MW) of sPS, increases with the electron-donating ability and steric hindrance of the ligands.11–16 For example, among Cp rings, Flu > Ind > Cp*(C5Me5) > Cp,17,18 and for ancillary ligand (L), F > OiPr ≈ OMe > OPh > Cl.19,20 The structure and composition of the cocatalyst MAO directly affect the formation, structure, and performance of the active center, including the oxidation state and distribution of Ti.17–20 Only Ti(III) active centers are effective for syndiospecific styrene polymerization.13,21
Furthermore, the structure and composition of MAO significantly impact the catalytic performance of half-titanocene complexes. MAO has been revealed to exist as a two-dimensional sheet cluster.22 MAO with an Al/C ratio near 1/1.41 exhibits higher activity, indicating that a minimum AlMAO/Ti ratio is required to maximize the number of active centers as [Ti]. In addition, MAO is always one of the most important economic factors in syndiospecific styrene polymerization under common industrial conditions.7,8,17 The cost of MAO often exceeds that of the main half-titanocene complex catalyst. Therefore, developing a catalytic system that requires less MAO as a cocatalyst remains a challenging topic with significant economic implications.
Based on these findings, this work designed and synthesised two fluorinated phenoxy half-titanocene catalysts, Cp*Ti(OC6F5)3 and Cp*Ti(-O-2,6-C6H3F2)3, for syndiospecific styrene polymerization under MAO activation. Compared with Cp*TiCl3 and Cp*Ti(OMe)3, they showed higher catalytic activity and produced sPS with higher MW under economical production conditions (AlMAO/Ti = 100). Furthermore, this study primarily explored the relationship between the structure of the phenoxy half-titanocene catalysts and the syndiospecific styrene polymerization as well as the MW of sPS.
1H, 13C and 19F NMR spectra of catalysts were recorded at ambient temperature using a Bruker AVANCE III-600 MHz spectrometer using standard parameters. 13C NMR spectra of sPS were recorded at 125 °C. The chemical shifts were referenced to the peaks of residual CDCl3 (δ = 7.26 in 1H NMR). Elemental analyses were performed using a Vario Elementar (EA).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): δ = 2.08 (s, 15H, C5Me5).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): δ = −169.92 (t, 1F, J = 23.0 and 23.8 Hz), −165.55 (t, 2F, J = 22.8 and 20.4 Hz), 160.60 (d, 2F, J = 20.2 Hz).
Anal. calc. for C28H15F15O3Ti: C, 45.93; H, 2.06. Found: C, 45.82, H, 3.41.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δ = 6.70 (d, 6H, O-2,6-C6H3F2), 6.57 (t, 3H, O-2,6-C6H3F2), 2.07 (s, 15H, C5Me5).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): δ = −129.32 (s, 2F).
Anal. calc. for C28H25F6O3Ti: C, 58.86; H, 4.10. Found: C, 57.99, H, 4.73.
The molecular weight was determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using a 1260 infinity II (Agilent, USA) at 150 °C with 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (with 0.0125 wt% butylated hydroxytoluene, BHT) as the eluent. Sample concentration: 1.0 mg mL−1.
A 13C NMR experiment for the typical polymer sample was performed using a Bruker AVANCE III-600 MHz spectrometer with d2-1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as the solvent at 125 °C. 13C NMR: (d2-1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 600 MHz, 125 °C) δ = 40.92, 44.15, 125.25, 127.58, 145.16.
For catalyst c1, Run 1–5 showed that the trend of polymerization activity first increased and then slowly decreased with the increase in the polymerization temperature. The results indicated that catalyst c1 could form a more thermodynamically stable Ti(III) active center than other half-titanocene complexes.13,24–26 The MW of the resulting sPS decreased with the increase in the polymerization temperature. This difference might be caused by high temperatures, which increased the rate of chain transfer. Appropriately increasing the reaction temperature could improve the activity of the catalyst c1, but the high temperature would also increase the rate of chain transfer and reduce the MW of sPS.13
In Run 6–12, the results showed that 80 °C was thought to be a preferable reaction temperature to 70 °C. When a low content of MAO (AlMAO/Ti = 100) was involved in the polymerization, a higher temperature could receive higher monomer conversion and higher catalytic activity in 3 h (Table 1). Besides, compared with Run 6–12, MAO was a more important factor than TIBA, which affected the catalytic activity and MW of the resulting sPS to a greater extent. When AlMAO/Ti = 50, excessively sparse MAO might not provide enough active centers for half-titanocene complexes c1 to form a Ti(III) catalytic active center. From the application viewpoint, it was acceptable to use cheap TIBA in place of expensive MAO where sPS with a MW more than 105 g mol−1 could be obtained and used for industrial production.
Run | Cat. | T (°C) | AlMAO/Ti | AlTIBA/Ti | Yieldb (g) | Conversionb % | Syndiotactic indexb (%) | Activityc | Mwd (10−5 g mol−1) | Đd | Tme (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Polymerization conditions: catalyst, 6.0 μmol in 2.0 mL toluene; styrene, 20 mL. Run 1–7, 2 h, Run 8–15, 3 h.b Estimated by the extraction experiment.c Activity in 103 kg sPS per mol cat per h.d GPC data.e DSC data. | |||||||||||
1 | c1 | 50 | 300 | 200 | 6.87 | 37.77 | 96 | 0.57 | 8.21 | 2.20 | 271 |
2 | c1 | 60 | 300 | 200 | 9.35 | 51.40 | 96 | 0.77 | 4.19 | 1.92 | 271 |
3 | c1 | 70 | 300 | 200 | 15.26 | 83.89 | 98 | 1.27 | 1.44 | 3.00 | 271 |
4 | c1 | 80 | 300 | 200 | 14.92 | 82.02 | 98 | 1.24 | 1.02 | 2.49 | 270 |
5 | c1 | 90 | 300 | 200 | 13.80 | 75.87 | 98 | 1.15 | 0.80 | 2.35 | 270 |
6 | c1 | 70 | 200 | 200 | 14.35 | 78.89 | 96 | 1.19 | 3.11 | 2.70 | 270 |
7 | c1 | 70 | 100 | 200 | 6.61 | 36.34 | 97 | 0.55 | 4.32 | 1.84 | 270 |
8 | c1 | 70 | 50 | 200 | 2.77 | 15.23 | 97 | 0.15 | 6.07 | 1.73 | 269 |
9 | c1 | 70 | 100 | 300 | 7.10 | 39.03 | 93 | 0.39 | 3.67 | 1.81 | 270 |
10 | c1 | 80 | 150 | 350 | 14.10 | 77.52 | 97 | 0.78 | 1.23 | 2.26 | 271 |
11 | c1 | 80 | 100 | 400 | 12.73 | 69.98 | 96 | 0.70 | 1.47 | 2.09 | 271 |
12 | c1 | 80 | 50 | 450 | 5.01 | 27.54 | 94 | 0.27 | 2.58 | 1.95 | 270 |
13 | c1 | 80 | 100 | 300 | 9.52 | 52.34 | 96 | 0.52 | 2.17 | 1.92 | 271 |
14 | c1 | 80 | 100 | 500 | 13.33 | 73.28 | 99 | 0.74 | 1.31 | 2.20 | 271 |
15 | c1 | 80 | 100 | 600 | 10.79 | 59.32 | 96 | 0.59 | 1.19 | 1.81 | 271 |
At 80 °C, AlMAO/Ti = 100, as the amount of TIBA increased, the catalytic activity first increased and then slowly decreased. Meanwhile, the MW of sPS decreased with the increase in TIBA, which confirmed that TIBA acted as a chain transfer agent and increased the number of active centers in polymerization. In the catalytic system, Ti existed multiple valence states, including Ti(IV), Ti(III), and Ti(II), but only Ti(III) could explain the high stereoselectivity of syndiospecific styrene polymerization.13–21 While excessive TIBA would increase the content of Ti(II) in the system and reduce the amount of catalytic Ti(III) active center, it was specifically manifested as the MW and the yield decreased.
The polymerization reaction conditions for Run 14: 80 °C, 3 h, AlMAO/Ti = 100, AlTIBA/Ti = 500, would be preferable to obtain sPS products with a MW of approximately 150000 g mol−1 and a Đ value of approximately 2. Besides, we discussed that the volume of additional toluene affects the polymerization, and the results are shown in the ESI.†27 In Table 2, Run 17–25, we supplemented the polymerization behavior of catalysts a, b and c2 under different conditions.
Run | Cat. | T (°C) | AlMAO/Ti | AlTIBA/Ti | Yieldb (g) | Conversionb/% | Syndiotactic indexb (%) | Activityc | Mwd (105 g mol−1) | Đd | Tme (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Polymerization conditions: catalyst 6.0 μmol with 2.0 mL toluene; styrene 20 mL. Reaction time, 3 h, Run 23, 2 h.b Estimated by the extraction experiment.c Activity in 103 kg sPS per mol cat per h.d GPC data.e DSC data. | |||||||||||
17 | a | 80 | 100 | 300 | 4.01 | 22.05 | 98 | 0.22 | 1.31 | 1.87 | 270 |
18 | a | 80 | 100 | 500 | 4.49 | 24.68 | 98 | 0.24 | 0.92 | 1.81 | 271 |
19 | a | 90 | 100 | 500 | 5.63 | 30.95 | 97 | 0.31 | 0.71 | 1.78 | 270 |
20 | b | 80 | 100 | 300 | 7.30 | 40.13 | 97 | 0.40 | 5.10 | 1.93 | 271 |
21 | b | 80 | 100 | 500 | 10.64 | 58.49 | 95 | 0.59 | 1.76 | 1.94 | 269 |
22 | b | 90 | 100 | 500 | 9.28 | 51.02 | 95 | 0.51 | 1.22 | 2.06 | 271 |
23 | c2 | 70 | 300 | 200 | 14.56 | 80.04 | 96 | 1.21 | 1.96 | 1.86 | 271 |
24 | c2 | 80 | 100 | 300 | 10.54 | 57.94 | 96 | 0.46 | 2.10 | 2.06 | 270 |
25 | c2 | 80 | 100 | 500 | 11.43 | 62.84 | 96 | 0.63 | 1.68 | 2.72 | 270 |
When AlMAO/Ti = 100 and AlTIBA/Ti = 300, the order of catalytic activity from high to low was c1 > c2 > b > a, and even when AlTIBA/Ti increased from 300 to 500, the order remained the same. The order showed that fluorinated phenoxy half-titanonece complexes c1 and c2 had a higher catalytic activity than that of a or b, which was surprisingly different from the order, OMe > OPh > Cl, discovered in previous studies.18,28 By modifying the phenoxy group with the electron-withdrawing fluorine atom, more electrons remained in the phenoxy conjugated system, and the electron-withdrawing effect of the fluorinated phenoxy ligand was enhanced, which is beneficial for high catalytic activity.29–31 This results were the same as Shen's study about syndiospecific styrene polymerization with various para-substituted phenoxy ligands. The enhancement of electron-releasing ability in para-substitution resulted in an increase in the catalytic activity.29 With the same main ligands, the ancillary ligands with stronger electron-releasing ability possessed greater catalytic activity. For the formation of the Ti(III) activity center, alkylation was a key step.6,32,33 From the perspective of the electronic effect of substitution reactions, ancillary ligands with stronger electron-withdrawing ability were easier to alkylate.32 The fast formation of Ti(III) active center was a reason why the fluorinated half-titanocene complex CpTiF3 has the highest catalytic activity.3 Therefore, the half-titanocene complexes with stronger electron-withdrawing ligands had a faster alkylation rate, the Ti(III) active center are formed more quickly, the proportion of Ti(III) active centers in the catalytic system increased, and the catalytic activity was higher.
The results presented in Fig. 3 showed that when AlMAO/Ti = 100 and AlTIBA/Ti = 300, the order of the MW of sPS was b > c1 > c2 > a. However, when AlTIBA/Ti increased to 500, the order of the MW changed to c2 > c1 > b > a. The differences in the MW of sPS were related to the polymerization rate and chain transfer rate in the syndiospecific styrene polymerization.34
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Influence of AlTIBA/Ti on syndiospecific styrene polymerization with different half-titanocene catalysts at 80 °C and AlMAO/Ti = 100: (a) activity and (b) molecular weight. |
The currently recognized mechanism A, in Scheme 1, held that the ancillary ligand was replaced by alkyl after alkylation and did not participate in the subsequent chain propagation, including styrene coordination and insertion reactions.20,35,36 However, it was difficult to explain why different trisubstituted half-titanocene complexes could obtain sPS with various MW values under the same conditions. According to the mechanism A, they should be the same. Moreover, the half-titanocene complex CpTiF3 could obtain an ultra-high MW of sPS.3 This result could be attributed to the fact that the fluoride ion had a strong interaction with the Ti(III) active center cation formed by Ti(III) and MAO, and that it had a large rate of styrene insertion.34 After the latest discoveries revealing the structure of MAO and the way MAO combined with the active center, the above explanation became less reliable.21,37–39
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Formation of two possible Ti(III) active centers. (A) Cationic active center, (B) neutral active center. |
Meanwhile, mechanism B held that an ancillary ligand should remain after alkylation and play a role in subsequent reactions, thus influencing the MW of sPS.37,38 In the studies by Yi and Nomara et al.,21,39 it was found that the half-titanocene complexes Cp*TiCl2(O-2,6-iPr2C6H3) retained one phenoxy ancillary ligand after treatment with MAO. In addition, they theoretically verified that the neutral Ti(III) active center with ancillary ligands was also one of the active species for catalytic polymerization.21 In our studies, on comparison between Run 13–14 and 17–25, we found that the MW of sPS catalysed by c2 was higher than that of c1, although the results in Run 13 and Run 14 were very close.
Besides, it could be concluded from Fig. 2 that the catalytic activity of each half-titanocene complex and the influence of TIBA on MW were different. When the content of TIBA was increased, the catalytic activity of a slightly increased, and the decrease in MW was also small. However, the catalytic activity of b increased significantly, and the decrease in MW was also large. The fluorinated half-titanocene complexes c1 and c2 had the advantages of both a and b. Increasing the content of TIBA can greatly improve their catalytic activity (which was better than that of b), and they could obtain sPS with a stable MW over 105 g mol−1. This unique property should be related to the large benzene ring ligand and the fluorine atoms. The phenoxy group with large steric hindrance and fluorine atoms, with strong electron-withdrawing ability, hindered the chain transfer from the Ti(III) active center to TIBA.13,25
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra00389j |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |