Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Syndiospecific polymerization of styrene with half-titanocene catalysts containing fluorinated phenoxy ligands

Bin Wua, Qingyu Zhanga, Hongyu Liua, Tongtong Zhanga, Xiaolong Yanga and Fangming Zhu*ab
aGDHPPC Lab, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
bKey Lab for Polymer Composite and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China. E-mail: ceszfm@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Received 16th January 2025 , Accepted 24th March 2025

First published on 7th April 2025


Abstract

Novel half-titanocene catalysts containing fluorinated phenoxy ligands were synthesized and used for the syndiotactic polymerization of styrene in the presence of low methylaluminoxane (MAO) and triisobutylaluminum (TIBA) as cocatalysts. The influences of polymerization conditions, including temperature and Al/Ti ratio, on polymerization behaviour and the molecular weight of the resultant polymer were studied. The fluorinated half-titanocene catalysts displayed higher catalytic activity and produced syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) with a higher molecular weight as a result of the electron-withdrawing conjugation effect of fluorinated phenoxy ligands. This effect stabilizes Ti(III) active centers and/or enhances propagation while reducing the chain transfer rate constant.


Introduction

In 1985, Ishihara and co-workers1–6 used half-titanocene complexes, CpTiL3 (Cp = η5-cyclopentadienyl)/methylaluminoxane (MAO), to efficiently synthesize syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS). Due to its high melting point (Tm = 270 °C), low density, and low dielectric constant, sPS has been widely used in automotive materials, electronic appliances, and precision instruments.6–8 Since then, syndiospecific styrene polymerization catalyzed by half-titanocene/MAO catalysts has drawn significant attention from both the academia and industry.9,10

After nearly four decades of exploration, researchers found that the catalytic activity of CpTiL3 activated by MAO, as well as the molecular weight (MW) of sPS, increases with the electron-donating ability and steric hindrance of the ligands.11–16 For example, among Cp rings, Flu > Ind > Cp*(C5Me5) > Cp,17,18 and for ancillary ligand (L), F > OiPr ≈ OMe > OPh > Cl.19,20 The structure and composition of the cocatalyst MAO directly affect the formation, structure, and performance of the active center, including the oxidation state and distribution of Ti.17–20 Only Ti(III) active centers are effective for syndiospecific styrene polymerization.13,21

Furthermore, the structure and composition of MAO significantly impact the catalytic performance of half-titanocene complexes. MAO has been revealed to exist as a two-dimensional sheet cluster.22 MAO with an Al/C ratio near 1/1.41 exhibits higher activity, indicating that a minimum AlMAO/Ti ratio is required to maximize the number of active centers as [Ti]. In addition, MAO is always one of the most important economic factors in syndiospecific styrene polymerization under common industrial conditions.7,8,17 The cost of MAO often exceeds that of the main half-titanocene complex catalyst. Therefore, developing a catalytic system that requires less MAO as a cocatalyst remains a challenging topic with significant economic implications.

Based on these findings, this work designed and synthesised two fluorinated phenoxy half-titanocene catalysts, Cp*Ti(OC6F5)3 and Cp*Ti(-O-2,6-C6H3F2)3, for syndiospecific styrene polymerization under MAO activation. Compared with Cp*TiCl3 and Cp*Ti(OMe)3, they showed higher catalytic activity and produced sPS with higher MW under economical production conditions (AlMAO/Ti = 100). Furthermore, this study primarily explored the relationship between the structure of the phenoxy half-titanocene catalysts and the syndiospecific styrene polymerization as well as the MW of sPS.

Experimental

Materials

All experiments were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere using the standard Schlenk techniques. All chemicals were used as received unless otherwise specified. Toluene (Analytical Reagent, Guangzhou Brand) was distilled in the presence of potassium and benzophenone under a nitrogen atmosphere, and then stored over the activated molecular sieves (3 A). Superdry dichloromethane, and n-hexane (99.9%, extra dry, with molecular sieves, water ≤ 50 ppm (by K. F.)) were purchased from Energy Chemical. Styrene was purchased from Amethyst. Methylaluminoxane solution (MAO, 4.7 wt% Al in toluene) was purchased from Botai. Triisobutylaluminum solution (TIBA, 1.0 M solution of toluene) was purchased from Rhawn. Trichloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) titanium(IV) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Trimethoxy(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) titanium(IV) was purchased from Laajoo. Pentafluorophenol and 2,6-difluorophenol were purchased from Aladdin.

1H, 13C and 19F NMR spectra of catalysts were recorded at ambient temperature using a Bruker AVANCE III-600 MHz spectrometer using standard parameters. 13C NMR spectra of sPS were recorded at 125 °C. The chemical shifts were referenced to the peaks of residual CDCl3 (δ = 7.26 in 1H NMR). Elemental analyses were performed using a Vario Elementar (EA).

Synthesis of Cp*Ti(OC6F5)3

A dichloromethane solution of Cp*Ti(OMe)3 (4.65 g, 16.8 mmol) was added dropwise at −78 °C to a solution of pentafluorophenol (9.57 g, 52.0 mmol) in 300 mL of dichloromethane. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for 12 h. The residue, obtained by removing the solvent under vacuum, was washed with 90 mL of n-hexane for 3 times. The desired product Cp*Ti(OC6F5)3 was isolated as orange crystals after recrystallization from the dichloromethane/n-hexane solution at 4 °C in a refrigerator overnight (10.66 g, 87%).

1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): δ = 2.08 (s, 15H, C5Me5).

19F NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): δ = −169.92 (t, 1F, J = 23.0 and 23.8 Hz), −165.55 (t, 2F, J = 22.8 and 20.4 Hz), 160.60 (d, 2F, J = 20.2 Hz).

Anal. calc. for C28H15F15O3Ti: C, 45.93; H, 2.06. Found: C, 45.82, H, 3.41.

Synthesis of Cp*Ti(O-2,6-C6H3F2)3

A dichloromethane solution of Cp*Ti(OMe)3 (0.46 g, 1.68 mmol) was added dropwise at −78 °C to a solution of 2,6-difluorophenol (0.68 g, 5.20 mmol) in 30 mL of dichloromethane. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 12 h. The residue, obtained by removing the solvent under vacuum, was washed 3 times with 10 mL of n-hexane. The desired product Cp*Ti(O-2,6-C6H3F2)3 was isolated as dark orange crystals after recrystallization from the dichloromethane/n-hexane solution at 4 °C in a refrigerator overnight (0.86 g, 90%).

1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δ = 6.70 (d, 6H, O-2,6-C6H3F2), 6.57 (t, 3H, O-2,6-C6H3F2), 2.07 (s, 15H, C5Me5).

19F NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): δ = −129.32 (s, 2F).

Anal. calc. for C28H25F6O3Ti: C, 58.86; H, 4.10. Found: C, 57.99, H, 4.73.

Bulk syndiospecific polymerization of styrene

Bulk syndiospecific polymerization of styrene with homogeneous half-titanocene catalysts was carried out in a 200 mL glass reactor equipped with a magnetic stirring bar under a nitrogen atmosphere. The calculated amounts of styrene were charged into the reactor and heated to the predetermined temperature in an oil bath. The polymerization reaction started after TIBA solution, MAO solution and the catalyst with toluene solution were injected in sequence. After the needed polymerization time, the reaction was terminated by adding 5.0 mL of methyl alcohol. The obtained solid or gel polymer was washed with 100 mL acidified ethanol (ethanol/HCl = 20/1) for 12 h and dried in vacuum at 60 °C. Approximately 0.5 g of polymer per sample was extracted in boiling butanone for 16 h in order to remove atactic polystyrene. The solid polymer was dried in vacuum at 60 °C for 12 h to obtain sPS.

Characterization of sPS

The melting temperature of polymer was determined using a DSC 204 F-1(Netzsch, GER). Approximately 3.0 mg of polymer sample was heated from 30 °C to 300 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere to remove the thermal history. After maintaining the temperature for 5 min, the sample was cooled down at a rate of 10 °C min−1 to 30 °C, and the temperature was again maintained for 5 min. Then, the sample was heated to 300 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. Finally, the second heating curve was recorded.

The molecular weight was determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using a 1260 infinity II (Agilent, USA) at 150 °C with 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (with 0.0125 wt% butylated hydroxytoluene, BHT) as the eluent. Sample concentration: 1.0 mg mL−1.

A 13C NMR experiment for the typical polymer sample was performed using a Bruker AVANCE III-600 MHz spectrometer with d2-1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as the solvent at 125 °C. 13C NMR: (d2-1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 600 MHz, 125 °C) δ = 40.92, 44.15, 125.25, 127.58, 145.16.

Results and discussion

A half-titanonece complex Cp*Ti(OC6F5)3 (c1) was synthesized according to the methods previously described in the literature.23,24 The 1H NMR spectra of c1 are shown in Fig. 1. Another half-titanonece complex Cp*Ti(O-2,6-C6H3F2)3 (c2) was synthesized in an identical manner for comparison with c1. The 1H NMR spectra of c2 are shown in the ESI. The 13C NMR spectra of the polymer after extraction are shown in Fig. 2(a), which was obtained insoluble during boiling 2-butanone from Run 14. The accurate spectrum indicated that the obtained polymer was syndiotactic polystyrene. Besides, the typical DSC curve of syndiotactic polystyrene gained from Run 14 is shown in Fig. 2(b), which noted that the melting point was about 271 °C.
image file: d5ra00389j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 1H and 19F NMR spectra of Cp*Ti(OC6F5)3.

image file: d5ra00389j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) 13C NMR spectrum of sPS (Run 14). (b) Typical DSC curve of sPS (Run 14).

For catalyst c1, Run 1–5 showed that the trend of polymerization activity first increased and then slowly decreased with the increase in the polymerization temperature. The results indicated that catalyst c1 could form a more thermodynamically stable Ti(III) active center than other half-titanocene complexes.13,24–26 The MW of the resulting sPS decreased with the increase in the polymerization temperature. This difference might be caused by high temperatures, which increased the rate of chain transfer. Appropriately increasing the reaction temperature could improve the activity of the catalyst c1, but the high temperature would also increase the rate of chain transfer and reduce the MW of sPS.13

In Run 6–12, the results showed that 80 °C was thought to be a preferable reaction temperature to 70 °C. When a low content of MAO (AlMAO/Ti = 100) was involved in the polymerization, a higher temperature could receive higher monomer conversion and higher catalytic activity in 3 h (Table 1). Besides, compared with Run 6–12, MAO was a more important factor than TIBA, which affected the catalytic activity and MW of the resulting sPS to a greater extent. When AlMAO/Ti = 50, excessively sparse MAO might not provide enough active centers for half-titanocene complexes c1 to form a Ti(III) catalytic active center. From the application viewpoint, it was acceptable to use cheap TIBA in place of expensive MAO where sPS with a MW more than 105 g mol−1 could be obtained and used for industrial production.

Table 1 Syndiospecific styrene polymerization with half-titanonece complexes c1 depending on temperature, AlMAO/Ti, and AlTIBA/Tia
Run Cat. T (°C) AlMAO/Ti AlTIBA/Ti Yieldb (g) Conversionb % Syndiotactic indexb (%) Activityc Mwd (10−5 g mol−1) Đd Tme (°C)
a Polymerization conditions: catalyst, 6.0 μmol in 2.0 mL toluene; styrene, 20 mL. Run 1–7, 2 h, Run 8–15, 3 h.b Estimated by the extraction experiment.c Activity in 103 kg sPS per mol cat per h.d GPC data.e DSC data.
1 c1 50 300 200 6.87 37.77 96 0.57 8.21 2.20 271
2 c1 60 300 200 9.35 51.40 96 0.77 4.19 1.92 271
3 c1 70 300 200 15.26 83.89 98 1.27 1.44 3.00 271
4 c1 80 300 200 14.92 82.02 98 1.24 1.02 2.49 270
5 c1 90 300 200 13.80 75.87 98 1.15 0.80 2.35 270
6 c1 70 200 200 14.35 78.89 96 1.19 3.11 2.70 270
7 c1 70 100 200 6.61 36.34 97 0.55 4.32 1.84 270
8 c1 70 50 200 2.77 15.23 97 0.15 6.07 1.73 269
9 c1 70 100 300 7.10 39.03 93 0.39 3.67 1.81 270
10 c1 80 150 350 14.10 77.52 97 0.78 1.23 2.26 271
11 c1 80 100 400 12.73 69.98 96 0.70 1.47 2.09 271
12 c1 80 50 450 5.01 27.54 94 0.27 2.58 1.95 270
13 c1 80 100 300 9.52 52.34 96 0.52 2.17 1.92 271
14 c1 80 100 500 13.33 73.28 99 0.74 1.31 2.20 271
15 c1 80 100 600 10.79 59.32 96 0.59 1.19 1.81 271


At 80 °C, AlMAO/Ti = 100, as the amount of TIBA increased, the catalytic activity first increased and then slowly decreased. Meanwhile, the MW of sPS decreased with the increase in TIBA, which confirmed that TIBA acted as a chain transfer agent and increased the number of active centers in polymerization. In the catalytic system, Ti existed multiple valence states, including Ti(IV), Ti(III), and Ti(II), but only Ti(III) could explain the high stereoselectivity of syndiospecific styrene polymerization.13–21 While excessive TIBA would increase the content of Ti(II) in the system and reduce the amount of catalytic Ti(III) active center, it was specifically manifested as the MW and the yield decreased.

The polymerization reaction conditions for Run 14: 80 °C, 3 h, AlMAO/Ti = 100, AlTIBA/Ti = 500, would be preferable to obtain sPS products with a MW of approximately 150[thin space (1/6-em)]000 g mol−1 and a Đ value of approximately 2. Besides, we discussed that the volume of additional toluene affects the polymerization, and the results are shown in the ESI.27 In Table 2, Run 17–25, we supplemented the polymerization behavior of catalysts a, b and c2 under different conditions.

Table 2 Syndiospecific styrene polymerization with different half-titanocene in the presence of MAO and TIBAa
Run Cat. T (°C) AlMAO/Ti AlTIBA/Ti Yieldb (g) Conversionb/% Syndiotactic indexb (%) Activityc Mwd (105 g mol−1) Đd Tme (°C)
a Polymerization conditions: catalyst 6.0 μmol with 2.0 mL toluene; styrene 20 mL. Reaction time, 3 h, Run 23, 2 h.b Estimated by the extraction experiment.c Activity in 103 kg sPS per mol cat per h.d GPC data.e DSC data.
17 a 80 100 300 4.01 22.05 98 0.22 1.31 1.87 270
18 a 80 100 500 4.49 24.68 98 0.24 0.92 1.81 271
19 a 90 100 500 5.63 30.95 97 0.31 0.71 1.78 270
20 b 80 100 300 7.30 40.13 97 0.40 5.10 1.93 271
21 b 80 100 500 10.64 58.49 95 0.59 1.76 1.94 269
22 b 90 100 500 9.28 51.02 95 0.51 1.22 2.06 271
23 c2 70 300 200 14.56 80.04 96 1.21 1.96 1.86 271
24 c2 80 100 300 10.54 57.94 96 0.46 2.10 2.06 270
25 c2 80 100 500 11.43 62.84 96 0.63 1.68 2.72 270


When AlMAO/Ti = 100 and AlTIBA/Ti = 300, the order of catalytic activity from high to low was c1 > c2 > b > a, and even when AlTIBA/Ti increased from 300 to 500, the order remained the same. The order showed that fluorinated phenoxy half-titanonece complexes c1 and c2 had a higher catalytic activity than that of a or b, which was surprisingly different from the order, OMe > OPh > Cl, discovered in previous studies.18,28 By modifying the phenoxy group with the electron-withdrawing fluorine atom, more electrons remained in the phenoxy conjugated system, and the electron-withdrawing effect of the fluorinated phenoxy ligand was enhanced, which is beneficial for high catalytic activity.29–31 This results were the same as Shen's study about syndiospecific styrene polymerization with various para-substituted phenoxy ligands. The enhancement of electron-releasing ability in para-substitution resulted in an increase in the catalytic activity.29 With the same main ligands, the ancillary ligands with stronger electron-releasing ability possessed greater catalytic activity. For the formation of the Ti(III) activity center, alkylation was a key step.6,32,33 From the perspective of the electronic effect of substitution reactions, ancillary ligands with stronger electron-withdrawing ability were easier to alkylate.32 The fast formation of Ti(III) active center was a reason why the fluorinated half-titanocene complex CpTiF3 has the highest catalytic activity.3 Therefore, the half-titanocene complexes with stronger electron-withdrawing ligands had a faster alkylation rate, the Ti(III) active center are formed more quickly, the proportion of Ti(III) active centers in the catalytic system increased, and the catalytic activity was higher.

The results presented in Fig. 3 showed that when AlMAO/Ti = 100 and AlTIBA/Ti = 300, the order of the MW of sPS was b > c1 > c2 > a. However, when AlTIBA/Ti increased to 500, the order of the MW changed to c2 > c1 > b > a. The differences in the MW of sPS were related to the polymerization rate and chain transfer rate in the syndiospecific styrene polymerization.34


image file: d5ra00389j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Influence of AlTIBA/Ti on syndiospecific styrene polymerization with different half-titanocene catalysts at 80 °C and AlMAO/Ti = 100: (a) activity and (b) molecular weight.

The currently recognized mechanism A, in Scheme 1, held that the ancillary ligand was replaced by alkyl after alkylation and did not participate in the subsequent chain propagation, including styrene coordination and insertion reactions.20,35,36 However, it was difficult to explain why different trisubstituted half-titanocene complexes could obtain sPS with various MW values under the same conditions. According to the mechanism A, they should be the same. Moreover, the half-titanocene complex CpTiF3 could obtain an ultra-high MW of sPS.3 This result could be attributed to the fact that the fluoride ion had a strong interaction with the Ti(III) active center cation formed by Ti(III) and MAO, and that it had a large rate of styrene insertion.34 After the latest discoveries revealing the structure of MAO and the way MAO combined with the active center, the above explanation became less reliable.21,37–39


image file: d5ra00389j-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Formation of two possible Ti(III) active centers. (A) Cationic active center, (B) neutral active center.

Meanwhile, mechanism B held that an ancillary ligand should remain after alkylation and play a role in subsequent reactions, thus influencing the MW of sPS.37,38 In the studies by Yi and Nomara et al.,21,39 it was found that the half-titanocene complexes Cp*TiCl2(O-2,6-iPr2C6H3) retained one phenoxy ancillary ligand after treatment with MAO. In addition, they theoretically verified that the neutral Ti(III) active center with ancillary ligands was also one of the active species for catalytic polymerization.21 In our studies, on comparison between Run 13–14 and 17–25, we found that the MW of sPS catalysed by c2 was higher than that of c1, although the results in Run 13 and Run 14 were very close.

Besides, it could be concluded from Fig. 2 that the catalytic activity of each half-titanocene complex and the influence of TIBA on MW were different. When the content of TIBA was increased, the catalytic activity of a slightly increased, and the decrease in MW was also small. However, the catalytic activity of b increased significantly, and the decrease in MW was also large. The fluorinated half-titanocene complexes c1 and c2 had the advantages of both a and b. Increasing the content of TIBA can greatly improve their catalytic activity (which was better than that of b), and they could obtain sPS with a stable MW over 105 g mol−1. This unique property should be related to the large benzene ring ligand and the fluorine atoms. The phenoxy group with large steric hindrance and fluorine atoms, with strong electron-withdrawing ability, hindered the chain transfer from the Ti(III) active center to TIBA.13,25

Conclusions

In this work, two novel half-titanocene complexes containing fluorinated phenoxy ligands, Cp*Ti(OC6F5)3 (c1) and Cp*Ti(-O-2,6-C6H3F2)3 (c2), were synthesized in high yields. In the presence of MAO as a cocatalyst, the two resulting half-titanocene complexes were compared with their precursor complex of Cp*Ti(OMe)3 under optimized polymerization conditions ([Ti] = 0.30 mmol L−1, AlMAO/Ti = 100, AlTIBA/Ti = 500, styrene = 20 mL, 80 °C for 3 h) displaying ∼2-fold higher catalytic activity as a result of electron-withdrawing conjugation effect of the fluorinated phenoxy ligand to promote the formation rate of Ti(III) active centers. Furthermore, it was noteworthy that the external addition of TIBA to the catalyst system led to a reduction of MAO dosage and an enhancement for catalytic activity, while the syndiotacticity and MW of the polymerization product were hardly influenced as a result of the higher stability of the Ti(III) active center with fluorinated phenoxy ligands.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Shenzhen Sunway Communication Co., Ltd (Contract No. HT-99982021-0269).

References

  1. N. Ishihara and T. Seimiya, Macromolecules, 1986, 19, 2464–2465 CAS.
  2. N. Ishihara, M. Kuramoto and M. Uoi, Macromolecules, 1988, 21, 3356–3360 CAS.
  3. W. Kaminsky, S. Lenk, V. Scholz, H. W. Roesky and A. Herzog, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 7647–7650 CAS.
  4. M. Malanga, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 1869–1872 CAS.
  5. J. Schellenberg and H. J. Leder, Adv. Polym. Technol., 2006, 25, 141–151 Search PubMed.
  6. M. Jaymand, Polym. Chem., 2014, 5, 2663–2690 Search PubMed.
  7. K. Nomura, Catal. Surv. Asia, 2010, 14, 33–49 CAS.
  8. K. Nomura and J. Liu, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 7666–7682 Search PubMed.
  9. Y. Zhu and R. Verduzco, Chem. Sci., 2021, 12, 16092–16099 RSC.
  10. Y. Zhu and E. Egap, ACS Macro Lett., 2020, 9, 725–730 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. G. W. Coates, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1223–1252 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. K. Nomura, H. Zhang and D.-J. Byun, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:Polym. Chem., 2008, 46, 4162–4174 CrossRef CAS.
  13. Syndiotactic Polystyrene: Synthesis, Characterization, Processing, and Applications, ed. J. Schellenberg, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 2010 Search PubMed.
  14. K. Nomura, Catal. Surv. Asia, 2010, 14, 33–49 CrossRef CAS.
  15. K. Nomura and J. Liu, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 7666–7682 Search PubMed.
  16. G. M. Miyake and E. Y. X. Chen, Polym. Chem., 2011, 2, 2462–2480 Search PubMed.
  17. T. E. Ready, R. O. Day, J. C. W. Chien and M. D. Rausch, Macromolecules, 1993, 26, 5822–5823 CrossRef CAS.
  18. T. E. Ready, J. C. W. Chien and M. D. Rausch, J. Organomet. Chem., 1996, 519, 21–28 Search PubMed.
  19. A. Zambelli, C. Pellecchia, L. Oliva, P. Longo and A. Grassi, Makromol. Chem., 1991, 192, 223–231 Search PubMed.
  20. J. C. W. Chien, Z. Salajka and S. Dong, Macromolecules, 1992, 25, 3199–3203 Search PubMed.
  21. J. Yi, N. Nakatani, N. Tomotsu, K. Nomura and M. Hada, Organometallics, 2021, 40, 643–653 CAS.
  22. L. Luo, J. M. Younker and A. V. Zabula, Science, 2024, 384, 1424–1428 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. J. Lee, Y. Do and Y. Kim, J. Organomet. Chem., 2007, 692, 3593–3598 Search PubMed.
  24. J. I. Amor, N. C. Burton, T. Cuenca, P. Gómez-Sal and P. Royo, J. Organomet. Chem., 1995, 485, 153–160 Search PubMed.
  25. N. Tomotsu, M. Kuramoto, M. Takeuchi and H. Maezawa, Metallocenes '96, Proc. Int. Congr. Metallocene Polym., 2nd, 1996, 211 Search PubMed.
  26. K. Nomura, I. Izawa, J. Yi, N. Nakatani, H. Aoki, H. Harakawa, T. Ina, T. Mitsudome, N. Tomotsu and S. Yamazoe, Organometallics, 2019, 38, 4497–4507 Search PubMed.
  27. F. Lin, Z. H. Liu, M. Y. Wang, B. Liu, S. H. Li and D. M. Cui, Angew. Chem., 2020, 59, 4324–4328 Search PubMed.
  28. J. Schellenberg, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2009, 34, 688–718 CAS.
  29. Z. G. Shen, R. Wang, W. Zhou, F. M. Zhu and S. Lin, Polym. Prepr., 2005, 46, 717–718 Search PubMed.
  30. Z. G. Shen, W. Zhou, J. Tu and R. Wang, Polym. Prepr., 2006, 47, 77–78 CAS.
  31. F. M. Zhu, Q. F. Wang, H. M Li and S. Lin, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2001, 79, 1243–1248 CAS.
  32. J. Schellenberg, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2002, 27, 1925–1982 Search PubMed.
  33. A.-S. Rodrigues, E. Kirillov and J.-F. Coord, Chem. Rev., 2008, 252, 2115–2136 Search PubMed.
  34. G. Xu and E. Ruckenstein, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:Polym. Chem., 1999, 37, 2481–2488 Search PubMed.
  35. A. Grassi, A. Zambelli and F. Laschi, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 480–482 Search PubMed.
  36. M. K. Mahanthappa and R. M. Waymouth, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 12093–12094 CAS.
  37. N. Tomotsu and N. Ishihara, Catal. Surv. Asia, 1997, 1, 89–110 CrossRef CAS.
  38. H. Zhang, D.-J. Byun and K. Nomura, Dalton Trans., 2007, 18, 1802–1806 RSC.
  39. J. Yi, N. Nakatani and K. Nomura, Dalton Trans., 2020, 49, 8008–8028 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra00389j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.