Camiel C. E.
Kroonen
a,
Adriano
D'Addio
a,
Allesandro
Prescimone
a,
Daniel
Häussinger
a and
Marcel
Mayor
*abc
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Basel, St Johanns-Ring 19, Basel 4056, Switzerland. E-mail: Marcel.Mayor@unibas.ch; Web: https://www.chemie1.unibas.ch/Bmayor/
bInstitute for Nanotechnology (INT), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), P. O. Box 3640, Karlsruhe 76021, Germany
cLehn Institute of Functional Materials (LIFM), School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou 510275, China
First published on 4th December 2024
This work explores the use of a cross-shaped organic framework that is used as a template for the investigation of multi-functionalized chromophores. We report the design and synthesis of a universal cross-shaped building block bearing two bromines and two iodines on its peripheral positions. The template can be synthesized on a gram scale in a five-step reaction comprising an oxidative homo-coupling macro-cyclization. The formed scaffold was selectively functionalized via Suzuki cross-coupling reactions with methoxynaphthalene, naphthalimide and BODIPY derivatives, yielding a library of cross-shaped and chromophore-decorated model compounds, all of which were fully characterized. The formed racemic bis- and tetra-substituted crosses were resolved via chiral stationary phase HPLC, and assignment of the enantiomers was done via comparison of experimental and simulated electronic circular dichroism spectra as well as enantiomer single-crystal analysis. Additionally, the hybrid naphthalimide/BODIPY chromophore was found to be acting as an intramolecular Förster energy resonance transfer pair, which was investigated in more detail. With this easy-to-functionalize universal building block, we believe it might prove to be useful in the study of different sets of chromophores.
Researchers found that the influence of two or more optically active molecules in close proximity can result in a variety of photophysical effects, e.g., excimer-induced red shifts, aggregation-induced fluorescence, etc.2,3 Understanding these phenomena proves to be critical due to their use in a variety of fields such as solar cells,4,5 sensing,6 catalysis7,8 and biomedical studies,9 for example, Förster Energy Resonance Transfer (FRET), which is used to study molecular dynamics in biological systems like substrate protein binding.10 Here, the donor chromophore or fluorophore, when in close enough proximity, transfers its potential fluorescence light to the next chromophore (acceptor).11 As a result, the overall fluorescence will vary depending on the distance and alignment between the donor and acceptor pair, providing insights into the spatial displacement and arrangement of the species e.g. molecular binding events. Understanding these photophysical phenomena, by studying how properties of distinct chromophores near each other influence one another, requires suitable model compounds with a fixed arrangement of their dye subunits.
Recently, there have been some examples investigating separated chromophores, attached to well-defined molecular superstructures.12–15 Crassous and co-workers synthesized helicene conjugates with naphthalimide, porphyrin or diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) derivatives.12–14 They showed that the chiral information of the helicenes was successfully transferred to the otherwise achiral optically active subunits. In addition, they showed that the measured circular dichroism directly relates to the exciton coupling between the chromophores. Another work, by Sidler et al., showed the importance of the spatial arrangement of chromophores by fixing a-chiral dyes (6-methoxy naphthalene) in a chiral structure.16 The confined arrangement in space resulted in induced axial chirality based on the intramolecular Davydov splitting assignment of excimers.17,18 Both studies showed how important the structural alignment of the chromophores is for the resulting properties of the system.
Inspired by these works and our recently developed cross-shaped motif, we envisioned that we could use this as a new organic superstructure. The rigid conformation of the cross-shaped motif, approaching close to a 90° angle, makes it a perfect candidate to supplement the already existing library of molecular frameworks.19 To make this motif even more appealing, it consists of two thermally stable enantiomers. A particularly interesting feature broadening the playing field is that the rigid cross-shaped motif can be split into a pair of rigid rod-type subunits by cleavage of both ester bonds.20
Here, we present a universal cross-shaped building block consisting of a pair of rigid rods, which can easily be functionalized and distinguished by common cross-coupling protocols. A library of systems consisting of up to four chromophores, including an intramolecular FRET pair, was synthesized to demonstrate its potential. These new multi-chromophore model compounds were analyzed in terms of optical and chiro-optical properties, which were attributed to the variety of structural features the cross-shaped framework provides.
In order to access a variety of cross-shaped tetrachromophores, we revised the synthetic route of our previous work. The original synthetic route contained a number of parallel sequences equal to the amount of different target compounds. In this work, we present a modular approach with a universal building block which can be decorated via well-established cross-coupling chemistry, like, for example, the Suzuki and Sonogashira reactions. This on one hand reduces the number of reaction steps significantly, and on the other hand, allows for the implementation of the bis-biphenyl cross template into a variety of molecular designs. The universal building block CBr2I2 is displayed in Scheme 1, while further insights concerning its design (ESI, Fig. S1†) and retrosynthesis (ESI, Scheme S1†) are provided in the ESI.†CBr2I2 contains iodide and bromide functionalities, acting as two separate addressable motifs at the end of both bars of the cross. The retrosynthetic analysis (displayed in the ESI, Scheme S1,† because it basically duplicates the forward synthesis displayed in Scheme 1) of CBr2I2 was envisioned over bis-boronic ester intermediate 1via an oxidative homo-coupling and deprotection process, and the Sandmeyer sequence could be transformed into CBr2I2. 1 could be obtained from previously synthesized 4,4′-dibromo-diphenic acid 2 and boronic ester 3via a two-fold esterification reaction.19 After successful synthesis of CBr2I2, the more reactive aryl-iodide over aryl-bromide with regard to palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling chemistry enables the temperature-controlled sequential decoration with coupling partners and thus also the controlled assembly of the members of the library.23
A study on the optical properties of the racemic mixture (rac)-CBr2I2 and its respective enantiomers (M)-CBr2I2 and (P)-CBr2I2 was conducted. The enantiomers were separated using chiral stationary phase HPLC (heptane:
ethyl acetate 1
:
1, Chiralpak IG column), and circular dichroism (CD) was measured. The good separation (ESI, Fig. S2†) of (rac)-CBr2I2 allowed for preparative isolation of tens of milligrams of the enantiomers. The CD spectra of the pure enantiomers indicated opposite signs of the Cotton bands (ESI, Fig. S3†) and allowed via DFT calculations the assignment of the first eluting enantiomer to be (M)-CBr2I2, while the second being (P)-CBr2I2 (ESI, Fig. S4†). This was further corroborated by growing enantiopure crystals of the second eluting enantiomer (Fig. 2). Slow diffusion of MeOH into a solution of E2-CBr2I2 rendered single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis, which were resolved as bearing only P enantiomers. Due to the fact that the obtained Flack parameter is nearly 0, the absolute configuration can be assigned with certainty and thus identifies the second eluting enantiomer as (P)-CBr2I2.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Solid-state structure of enantiopure (P)-CBr2I2 plotted as an ORTEP plot with 50% probability, obtained as a second eluting enantiomer. |
To access the naphthalimide (NI) and BODIPY (BY) functionalized model compounds, the corresponding literature known boronic ester coupling partners were synthesized (ESI, Page S6 and S7†).24,25NI-Br and BY-Br were synthesized via imide condensation and a one-pot condensation process, oxidation and a BF2 insertion reaction, respectively. The bromides were converted to boronic esters via a Miyaura borylation process, yielding NI-Bpin and BY-Bpin in good yields over two steps.
The corresponding bis- and tetra-functionalized chromophores (CBr2NI2, CNI4, CBr2BY2 and CBY4) as well as a hybrid system (CNI2BY2) were synthesized following the same pathway as the methoxynaphthalene chromophores (Scheme 2). Depending on the solubility of the involved reaction partners and target structures, the solvent mixtures were adapted, yielding all of the desired cross-shaped and chromophore-decorated targets after simple silica gel column chromatography in acceptable yields and good quality. The quick accessibility of the variety of cross-shaped tetrachromophores showcases the easy and selective peripheral decoration of CBr2I2via the common Suzuki cross-coupling protocols. Of particular interest was the subsequent optical investigation of the obtained chromophore-decorated model compounds.
By comparing the spectra of CNI2BY2 with the NI and BY series, the absorbance features of both chromophores at 360 and 500 nm, respectively, can clearly be identified. The fluorescent spectrum of CNI2BY2, however, has solely a BY characteristic with the exact same emission maxima (λem,max = 513 nm) as the other BY decorated model compounds. Even excitation of CNI2BY2 at 360 nm, which is the main NI absorption band, results in the same BY fluorescence spectra (ESI, Fig. S11†). As the emission of NI overlaps with the absorption region of BY, this is the expected optical feature of an intramolecular FRET, further corroborating the close proximity of both chromophores in the structure.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 Solid-state structure of (M)-CBr2BY2 in the racemic crystal of CBr2BY2, plotted as ORTEP plots with 50% probability. Plotted as a single enantiomer and without solvent molecules for clarity. |
As we continued our structural investigation, we quickly encountered the complexity of these systems in terms of nomenclature and supposed chirality assignment. The difference in the substitution pattern on rod 1 (ortho) and rod 2 (meta) induces a size mismatch similar to banister type molecules, hence we describe the arising helicity with P and M.‡29 In Fig. 5, a schematic representation of the structure is displayed, with the corresponding nomenclature of the cross-shaped framework, acting as a guide for the following part.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 Schematic representation of the (P)-cross-shaped framework decorated with four chromophores. Rod 1 resembles the alcohol side of the molecule, while Rod 2 the ester side. |
Analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed that the Naph- and BY-decorated crosses showed the characteristic peak splitting of the diastereotopic benzylic ester protons into two doublets (ESI, Page S75–S116†). However, in the case of the NI series (CBr2NI2 and CNI4), according to our interpretation, a set of eight doublets was found (ESI, Fig. S16†). In contrast, when NI was introduced on rod 2 (CNI2BY2), this was not observed.
We attributed this additional splitting to the presence of two additional conformational orientations of the bulkier NI in comparison with the Naph and phenyl spacers of BY. The steric repulsion of the CH2 bridge at the peripheral 3 and 3′ positions of rod 1 in combination with the rigid center motif forces the NI moiety to an additional set of conformers. Due to the hindered rotation of NI, 2 additional atropisomeric centers were created: Ra3/Sa3 and Ra3′/Sa3′.
Using VT-NMR, we investigated the rotational barrier of CBr2NI2 (Fig. S17†). To our surprise, upon heating to 120 °C in C2D2Cl4, we saw minor shifts in the proton signals, but the diastereotopic protons remained visible as 8 doublets. This points at a surprisingly high rotation barrier for the conformer interconversion. We hypothesize that this might arise from the structural entanglement of the center motif. As the NI motif clashes with the ester bridge on both sides simultaneously, the center motif probably cannot adopt the conformation required to let the NI pass.
To further shed light on the potential different conformers, DFT calculations were performed. The geometry optimized structures revealed that there were 4 potential conformers per enantiomer (ESI, Page S20 and Fig. S43–S45†), namely Ra3,R3′; Sa3,Sa3′; Ra3,Sa3′ and Sa3,Ra3′. In these calculated structures, the Ra3,Sa3′ and Sa3,Ra3′ conformers are identical, giving a total of 3 diastereoisomers; thus, 3 pairs of doublets would be expected. Instead, 4 pairs of doublets were observed (ESI, Fig. S16†), suggesting that, for the Ra3,Sa3′ (=Sa3,Ra3′) conformer, there is a symmetry loss. Thus, assuming that the chemical shielding for Ra3 and Ra3′ as well as for Sa3 and Sa3′ are identical or very close would lead to additional signal splitting, hence the additional set of doublets.
To gain further comprehension about the elaborate architecture, their chiral properties were studied by comparing the recorded spectra with the simulated ones. First, the enantiomers of all chromophore-decorated cross-shaped model compounds were separated using analytical scale chiral-stationary phase HPLC (ESI, Page S18, S22, S25 and S27†). In the case of CBr2NI2 and CNI4, the focus was on the separation of the (M) and (P) enantiomers. However, the HPLC traces (ESI, Fig. S18†) revealed that the enantiomers were indeed composed of several conformers. With in-line CD detection, the conformation of the center motif was assigned, assuring that the enantiomer sets were successfully separated (ESI, Page S22†). To corroborate this claim experimentally, enantiopure syntheses of (P)-CBr2NI2 and (P)-CNI4 were performed with (P)-CBr2I2 as the starting material. The samples obtained by the enantiopure assembly were identical to the separated ones from racemic synthesis, assuring the enantiopurity of the separated samples.
With all separated enantiomers in hand, their respective CD spectra were recorded (ESI, Page S18, S23, S25 and S27†). As expected, moderate Cotton bands of opposite sign were observed for all here-reported separated pairs of enantiomers. Simulation of all P isomers and comparison to the experimental spectra allowed the assignment of the helicity of all the resolved samples. With the here-applied separation conditions, the P isomers elute first during the resolution of CBr2Naph2, CBr2NI2, and CNaph4; they elute second in the case of CBr2I2, CBr2BY2, CNI4, CBY4 and CNI2BY2.
As an example, the CD spectra of the enantiomers of the Naph series are displayed in Fig. 6. Upon comparison of the CD spectra recorded for the two- and four-fold substituted chromophores, CBr2Naph2 and CNaph4, respectively, a significant red shift in the spectra was observed. While the first Cotton band of CBr2Naph2 appeared at 305 nm, it was at 325 nm in the case of CNaph4. This shift can be assigned to the communication between the methoxynaphthalene subunits on rod 1 and rod 2, respectively, as it is absent when only rod 1 is substituted. The observed bisignate signal for the CNaph4 enantiomers indicates an exciton coupled feature.18 Comparison of the CD signal to the earlier reported methoxynaphthalene architecture of Sidler et al. showed that these specific Cotton bands appear at exactly the same wavelengths, strengthening the argument for an exciton coupled signal.16 Inspired by this observation, we applied the exciton chirality method (ECM) to the four-fold decorated crosses: CNaph4, CNI4 and CBY4.
The orientation of rod 1 to rod 2 in the P isomers should lead to a so-called negative couplet, as indicated by the grey arrow in Fig. 5. This negative couplet was indeed observed in (P)-CNaph4, (P)-CNI4, and (P)-CBY4 (ESI, Fig. S31†), while in the case of the M enantiomers, the bisignate signal was first positive and then negative, hence, a positive couplet.
While CBr2Naph2 and CBr2NI2 lack this feature, CBr2BY2 showed a weaker but clear bisignate signal at around 500 nm. A positive couplet was observed for the P enantiomer, while the M enantiomer displayed a negative one. Obviously, in the case of CBr2BY2, the chiral information is communicated over rod 1 rather than between the terminal chromophores of both rods of the scaffold. Our current working hypothesis is that this is only detected for the BY chromophore because of the orientation of the excited dipole moment with a substantial contribution perpendicular to the rod's main axis, which is not the case for the other two chromophores. As the bi-phenyl axis of rod 1 is entangled with the helicity of the central part of the cross (adopting an Ra configuration‡), a positive couplet is expected for the P enantiomer (ESI, Fig. S32†).
According to the here-presented results, the ECM method is suited to assign the respective enantiomers for their four-fold substituted chromophores; however, the careful consideration of all chiral centers turned out to be crucial. The created library allowed us to dive into initially unexpected features, which via full-geometrical examination could be assigned to a variety of features the framework exhibits.
The study shows that the organic framework acts as an excellent and versatile platform for studying a variety of chromophores in a confined space, allowing for the investigation of novel properties such as chirality and FRET. In addition, the presented halide-decorated precursor enables its integration as a functional unit in a variety of applications by C–C coupling chemistry.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 2378892–2378894. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qo01808g |
‡ The chirality could also be described by axial or planar chirality. In general, the P isomer of the crosses corresponds to an Ra,Ra or SP configuration. |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2025 |