Kateřina
Delawská‡
ab,
Jan
Hájek‡
a,
Kateřina
Voráčová‡
a,
Marek
Kuzma
c,
Jan
Mareš
ad,
Kateřina
Vicková
a,
Alan
Kádek
e,
Dominika
Tučková
ab,
Filip
Gallob
f,
Petra
Divoká
ab,
Martin
Moos
g,
Stanislav
Opekar
g,
Lukas
Koch
ij,
Kumar
Saurav
a,
David
Sedlák
k,
Petr
Novák
e,
Petra
Urajová
a,
Jason
Dean
a,
Radek
Gažák
l,
Timo J. H.
Niedermeyer
ij,
Zdeněk
Kameník
l,
Petr
Šimek
g,
Andreas
Villunger
fh and
Pavel
Hrouzek†
*a
aCentre Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Novohradká 237, Centre Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 379 01 Třeboň, Czech Republic. E-mail: hrouzek@alga.cz
bDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1645/31a, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
cLaboratory of Molecular Structure Characterization, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic
dInstitute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Sádkách 702/7, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
eLaboratory of Structural Biology and Cell Signaling, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic
fCeMM - Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Lazarettgasse 14, 1090 Wien, Austria
gInstitute of Entomology, Laboratory of Analytical Biochemistry and Metabolomics, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 1160/31, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
hInstitute for Developmental Immunology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Biocenter, Innsbruck, Austria
iInstitute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 2+4, 14195 Berlin, Germany
jInstitute of Pharmacy, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, 06120 Halle, (Saale), Germany
kInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Praha
lLaboratory of Antibiotic Resistance and Microbial Metabolomics, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic
First published on 22nd November 2024
Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) are intriguing compounds with potential pharmacological applications. While many RiPPs are known as antimicrobial agents, a limited number of RiPPs with anti-proliferative effects in cancer cells are available. Here we report the discovery of nostatin A (NosA), a highly modified RiPP belonging among nitrile hydratase-like leader peptide RiPPs (proteusins), isolated from a terrestrial cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. Its structure was established based on the core peptide sequence encoded in the biosynthetic gene cluster recovered from the producing strain and subsequent detailed nuclear magnetic resonance and high-resolution mass spectrometry analyses. NosA, composed of a 30 amino-acid peptide core, features a unique combination of moieties previously not reported in RiPPs: the simultaneous presence of oxazole/thiazole heterocycles, dehydrobutyrine/dehydroalanine residues, and a sactionine bond. NosA includes an isobutyl-modified proline residue, highly unusual in natural products. NosA inhibits proliferation of multiple cancer cell lines at low nanomolar concentration while showing no hemolysis. It induces cell cycle arrest in S-phase followed by mitochondrial apoptosis employing a mechanism different from known tubulin binding and DNA damaging compounds. NosA also inhibits Staphylococcus strains while it exhibits no effect in other tested bacteria or yeasts. Due to its novel structure and selective bioactivity, NosA represents an excellent candidate for combinatorial chemistry approaches leading to development of novel NosA-based lead compounds.
One of the most notoriously known RiPP groups are lanthipeptides possessing a thioether linkage created by a cysteine residue and a dehydrated amino-acid residue (typically threonine or serine) which is catalyzed by different types of lanthipeptide synthetases.4 Another large groups of RiPPs are linear azole containing peptides (LAPs)1 or thiazole–oxazole modified microcins (TOMMs).5 These compounds are characterized by the presence of multiple thiazol(in)e and/or (methyl)oxazol(in)e heterocycles formed via heterocyclization of Cys, Ser, and Thr residues with an adjacent amino acid. This process is catalyzed by a YcaO cyclodehydratase6 and can be followed by the action of a facultative dehydrogenase oxidizing azolines to azole heterocycles, thereby introducing an additional double bond. LAPs and TOMMs are widely found across the bacterial domain including cyanobacteria (cyanobactins)7 and other bacterial groups (telomestatins,8 microcins,9 and goadsporin10).
It is noteworthy that particular structural motifs can be combined within one molecule, resulting in a complex final RiPP structure. On top of that, some authors have reported high similarity in the RiPP leader peptide sequences suggesting common evolutionary roots in some RiPPs.11 As a result, today's RiPP nomenclature is based on signature enzymes and leader peptide characteristics, however, different RiPP features are often combined in mosaic-like pathways. As an example, bioinformatics surveys have pointed out an abundant class of RiPP BGCs that contain a leader peptide with strong homology to nitrile hydratase. This class of RiPPs entitled proteusins was found to be widely encoded in bacterial genomes and their final products can be very variable.11–13 Examples of so far known proteusin members include polytheonamides14,15 isolated from a marine sponge Theonella swinhoei and landornamides for which the BGC was discovered in the genome of a cyanobacterium Kamtonema sp. and subsequently prepared by heterologous expression in E. coli.12 While polytheonamides exhibit extraordinary strong cytotoxic activity in human leukemia cells in vitro,14 landornamides exhibit antiviral effects.12 This suggest proteusins as a prolific source for development of novel peptide drugs.
Modulation of the cell division machinery still represents one of the main strategies for cancer therapy.16 Approximately 60% of the anti-cancer drugs used in medicine are of natural origin or derived from chemical structures found in nature.17 Natural products currently used in cancer treatment can be classified into three main groups based on their mechanism of action: DNA damaging agents, drugs inhibiting the key enzymes of DNA metabolism, and drugs altering microtubule dynamics.18 However, natural products with alternative modes of action are ready to be approved in the clinic.18 Regardless of the afore-mentioned cellular perturbations, tumor cell death is often preceded by a cell cycle arrest phenotype.19 The cell cycle can be arrested either in the G1 phase when growth signals are lacking, in S-phase when replication fidelity is compromised, or, in the case of DNA damage, in G1 or prior G2/M transition, while tubulin inhibitors promote the mitotic arrest. When genome integrity cannot be maintained or cells succumb to extended mitotic arrest, this typically culminates in the induction of apoptosis.19 In the case of natural cytostatic drugs, apoptosis usually proceeds via the “intrinsic pathway” regulated by the Bcl-2 protein family and is executed by family members Bcl-associated X protein (BAX) and Bcl-2 antagonist/killer1 (BAK). The BAX and BAK proteins activate effector caspases 3 and 7 via mitochondrial membrane permeabilization which is followed by the degradation phase of apoptosis.20
Here, we present the discovery of nostatin A (NosA) from the soil-dwelling cyanobacterium Nostoc sp., a novel and highly unusual RiPP with potent selective antimicrobial activity and antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect in cancer cells.
The MS2 fragmentation did not show any fragment ions interpretable as naturally occurring amino acids. Moreover, corresponding neutral losses did not fit any common residues observed in peptides. However, the extended analyses of fragment ions at higher masses revealed multiple occurrences of prominent neutral losses, namely 207 Da, 221 Da, 250 Da, and 257 Da. The building blocks corresponding to these neutral losses are also detectable as charged fragment ions at m/z 208.07167, m/z 222.08732, m/z 251.07748, and m/z 258.0543, interpretable as C9H10N3O3+ (Δ −1.77 ppm), C10H12N3O3+ (Δ −0.98 ppm), C10H11N4O4+ (Δ 0.07 ppm) and C9H12N3O4S1+ (Δ 0.37 ppm), respectively (Table S2 and Fig. S12†). The ring and double bond equivalent (rdb) values of these fragments range between 6 and 8. Such values indicate an exceptionally high number of double bonds and/or multiple cyclization. Tentatively assuming a peptidic character of the compound, all these fragments might be interpreted as modified tripeptides, e.g., the sum formula C9H10N3O3+ likely corresponds to a double dehydrated and oxidized Ser-Ser-Ala derivative. This infers the presence of dehydrated residues such as dehydroalanine (Dha) or dehydrobutyrine (Dhb) and/or formation of intramolecular heterocycles such as thiazole (Tza), oxazole (Oxa) and methyl-oxazole (mOxa) as frequently found in RiPPs such as TOMMs or LAPs.1 Consequently, the above-mentioned fragments can be interpreted as modified tripeptides originating from Cys-Thr-Thr, Ser-Ser-Ala, Thr-Ser-Ala/Ser-Thr-Ala, Ser-Ser-Asn, Ser-Cys-Ser and Ala-Thr-Thr, respectively. Additional targeted MS3 fragmentation experiments confirmed that the ion observed at m/z 936 consists solely of four of the previously mentioned fragments, namely those at m/z 258, 251, 222, and 208 in this particular order (Fig. S12 and Table S3†). As the fragment with m/z 222 might equally originate from Ser-Thr-Ala leading to Dha-mOxa-Ala as well as from Thr-Ser-Ala leading to Dhb-Oxa-Ala, two partial hypothetical precursor peptide sequences were proposed: SSASSNSCS or SSA
SSNSCS, differing only in the sequence of the second amino acid triplet.
These partial sequences were used as queries in a genome search in the producer strain, yielding a single hit within a putative BGC of an unknown RiPP. The gene cluster (16.98 kbp, GenBank accession no. OR609362) consisted of nine deduced genes exhibiting homology to known genes in TOMM BGCs (Fig. 1 and Table S4†) and featuring strong homology to nitrile-hydratase leader peptide RiPPs, qualifying the compound among proteusins, a class of RiPPs with only a few known products.12 The precursor peptide (NstC) harbored the core peptide sequence AASCQTTASSACTTPSCLSSASTASSNSCS, which includes one of the suggested precursor peptide fragments. Further bioinformatic analyses of proteins encoded in the NosA BGC predicted a thiazoline/oxazoline-forming cyclodehydratase (NstD), possibly catalyzing the cyclization of Cys and Ser/Thr residues, an oxidase involved in the oxidation of thiazolines/oxazolines to thiazoles/oxazoles (NstE), a PoyD-like amino acid epimerase (NstF), and a LanM-like enzyme (NstG) possibly responsible for the dehydration of Ser and Thr residues to Dha and Dhb, respectively.
Interestingly, in addition to the PoyD-like epimerase NstF, the NosA BGC also encodes another radical SAM protein (NstA). As suggested by NMR analysis (Table S1, Fig. S8–S10†), the proline residue present in the structure of NosA is modified to a γ-isobutyl-proline residue. NstA was annotated as a class B cobalamine-dependent C-methyltransferase (Table S4 and Fig. S13†). Similar enzymes are involved in iterative C-methylation of RiPP compounds such as polytheonamides (PoyB/C)22 and non-ribosomal peptide synthetase products such as lapcin (LapC)23 forming simple or branched aliphatic side chains. Therefore, we hypothesize that NstA could be responsible for the sequential methylation of the Pro residue in NosA. This prediction was supported by the detection of NosA variants containing a proline residue with side chains shorter by one/two methylene groups in the original Nostoc sp. CCALA 1144 extract (see below for further details).
Taking into consideration the primary peptide sequence predicted based on the genome search and the posttranslational modifications including dehydration of Ser/Thr residues and heterocyclization of Ser/Thr/Cys residues, the structure of NosA could be interpreted as 1Ala-2Ala-3Dha-4Tza-5Gln-6Dhb-7mOxa-8Ala-9Dha-10Oxa-11Ala-12Cys-13mOxa(H)-14Thr-15Pro(4-iBu)-16Dha-17Tza-18Leu-19Dha-20Oxa-21Ala-22Dha-23mOxa-24Ala-25Dha-26Oxa-27Asn-28Dha-29Tza-30Ser. The presence of a PoyD-like epimerase (NstF) in the gene cluster suggests that some of the amino acid residues might be present in their D-form. We subjected the NosA peptide to acidic hydrolysis and performed a chiral amino acid analysis. Apart from D-trans-4-(Pro(4-iBu), all other amino acids were present in their L-configuration according to our analyses24,25 (see supplementary results and Fig. S14 and S15†). This suggests considerable substrate specificity a of the NstF epimerase, which is rather uncommon among RiPP epimerases.26
The proposed structure yields the sum formula C107H132N32O32S4 that fits well to experimentally obtained m/z 2505.8540 [M + H]+ (Δ 0.01 ppm), 1253.4356 [M + 2H]2+ (Δ −0.07 ppm) and 835.9594 [M + 3H]3+ (Δ −0.12 ppm). The sum formula was additionally corroborated using 15N labeled NosA with an observed corresponding increase of the molecular weight by 32 Da resulting in m/z at 2537.7699 (Δ 0.05 ppm) and 1269.3884 (Δ 0.12 ppm) for [M + H]+ and [M + 2H]2+, respectively (Table S5†).
With the results of the gene cluster analysis in hand to guide the assignments, MS2 fragmentation identified fragments (F1–F12) confirming the predicted sequence (Fig. 2) with a precision of <0.5 ppm (Table S2†). Due to the presence of Oxa/Tza heterocycles, tripeptide fragments (F3–F6, F8–F12) were highly stable in the performed MS2 experiments. In the case of F6 and F12, loss of H2S and/or H2O was observed, but the peptide bonds remained intact (Table S2†). Except for the fragments F6 and F12 (Fig. 2), all fragments were identified unambiguously, as no other structural solution could be found when taking into consideration the primary peptide sequence. The fragment F12, originating from Ser-Cys-Ser, might theoretically be post-translationally modified into 28Dha-29Cys-30Oxa as well as 28Dha-29Tza-30Ser. The correct interpretation was confirmed by selective MS3 fragmentation showing a clear H2O loss for the F12 fragment (258.0543 → 240.0438, Δ 0.17 ppm), proving the presence of an unmodified free hydroxyl-containing residue (i.e., 30Ser), strongly suggesting 28Dha-29Tza-30Ser as the correct substructure. The F6 fragment might be post-translationally modified into 12Cys-13Thr-14mOxa(H) or 12Cys-13mOxa(H)-14Thr. The MS2 fragmentation suggested the presence of free thiol and hydroxyl groups supported by a combined loss of H2O and H2S, leading to m/z 254.1135 (C11H15N3O4 + H+, Δ −0.13 ppm). The distinct structure of fragment F6 (12Cys-13mOxa(H)-14Thr) was elucidated using NMR (see below). However, a free thiol group in a molecule containing reactive double bonds is highly unlikely, because immediate alkene hydrothiolation is expected to occur. Hence, the presence of a thioether- or thioether-like bond is likely and was confirmed by NMR as well (see below).
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Schematic representation of the structure of NosA showing the integrated results obtained from MS and NMR spectroscopic analyses. (A) Structure of Nos A – individual residues are labeled consecutively from the N-terminus. Main HRMS fragments F1–F12 are indicated with grey boxes. Arrows show the most relevant 1H-/13C and 1H-/15N HMBC correlations; COSY correlations are depicted as bolded bonds. (B) Schematic representation of the most informative fragments of NosA (top) and mass spectrum (bottom). Individual y- and b-ions are labeled in red and blue, respectively. The interpretation of the most intense MS fragments which were not used for establishing of the peptide sequence are given in Fig. S16.† |
The final tripeptide building blocks formed by posttranslational modification share a unified structure containing Dha/Dhb at position 1, heterocycle (Tza/Oxa/mOxa) at position 2 and a natural unmodified amino acid at position 3 (Fig. 2). A very similar modification pattern has been reported in the structures of several bacterial TOMMs such as phazolicin,27 spongiicolazolicins A and B,28 and goadsporin,10 in which, however, the occurrence of dehydrated residues (Dha/Dhb) is less common (Fig. 1). In addition, the published MS2 data of spongiicolazolicin B, a compound structurally similar to NosA, reveals an almost identical pattern of fragmentation based on tripeptide building blocks. The F6 fragment of NosA (12Cys-13mOxa(H)-14Thr) is the only tripeptide possessing a residue other than Dha/Dhb at position 1.
The collision-induced dissociation did not provide appropriate information on the overall NosA sequence due to the breakdown of the molecule to fragments below m/z 1500 only. Thus, infrared-multiple photon dissociation (IRMPD) of selected single- and double-charged ions directly inside the ICR cell was used to gain additional information on the complete fragmentation pathway including the initial losses. The fragmentation of the single charged NosA ion shows interpretable b- and y-ions, including neutral losses of H2O, H2S, and CO corresponding to subsequent losses of F1 to F12 with sufficient precision (Fig. 2, and Table S5†). The c-ions are also detectable for the majority of the fragments (Table S5†), however, this series is observed only after the initial cleavage of 1Ala-2Ala.
Due to the high number of aromatic heterocycles and Dha/Dhb residues, NosA might form a tautomeric structure, leading to the reorganization of hydrogens present on the main backbone (Fig. S17†), making the interpetation of NMR complicated. The fragments F6 (12Cys-13mOxa(H)-14Thr), F7 (15Pro(4-iBu)) and F8 (16Dha-17Tza-18Leu), however, do not allow higher resonance and corresponding NMR correlations were detected (Fig. S18–S31†). NMR signals interpreted as Leu, Thr, and γ-isobutyl-proline might be assigned as 18Leu, 14Thr, and 15Pro(4-iBu). The previously suggested spin system –NHCHCH2– corresponds to 12Cys. The CH3CHCH– spin system is a part of the methyl-oxazoline ring of 13mOxa(H). The substructure containing 16Dha and 17Tza was supported by 1H–13C HMBC and 1H–15N HMBC as depicted in Fig. 2. An HMBC correlation was detected between the methylene of 12Cys and a quaternary carbon at 61.5 ppm, which is further coupled with an amide NH at 9.595 ppm and a methyl singlet. Additionally, the NH is coupled to a previously unassigned oxazole/thiazole ring and the carbonyl group of 18Leu. This specific correlation indicates the existence of a thioether bridge between 12Cys and 19Dha.
The Michael addition of a thiol to a dehydroalanine residue would be expected to occur on the exomethylene carbon, resulting in a tertiary alpha- and a secondary beta-carbon atom.29 The correlation of the 12Cys β-H to a quaternary carbon attached to a methyl group, however, indicates that the thiol group is linked directly to the amino acid alpha-carbon as described for sactipeptides30 and not the beta-carbon as observed in lanthipeptides. In the case of sactipeptides, a radical SAM enzyme is required for the initial activation (oxidation) of the alpha-carbon.30 As discussed earlier, the radical SAM enzyme encoded by nstA is more likely to be linked to sequential C-methylation of the 15Pro residue (Table S4 and Fig. S13†). NstA exhibited very weak homology and could not be aligned to known radical SAM enzymes involved in sactionine bond formation in compounds such as subtilosin A (AlbA), thuricin (ThnB), thurincin (TrnC/D) or sporulation killing factor (SkfB).31 Moreover, in NosA, the 19Ser is initially dehydrated to 19Dha likely allowing spontaneous formation of sactipeptide bridge due to the existence of a tautomeric structure (Fig. S17,† for detailed explanation, see supplementary results) and finally resulting in 19Ala (labeled as 19Ala(sb*) because of its inclusion in the sactipeptide bridge). The direct linkage between 19Ala(*sb) and 12Cys(*sb) is further substantiated by the targeted MS2 analyses showing a fragment at m/z 495.16573 corresponding to F6 + F9 connected via a thioether bridge (Table S3†).
The 5Pro(4-iBu) residue, proposed to be installed by NstA, is one of the most notable features of NosA, as such a proline functionalization is highly unusual in natural products. In currently described compounds, mostly single methylation on the γ-position is observed.32–34 More complex proline side chains are rare, unbranched aliphatic chains are found only in lincomycins, pyrrolobenzodiazepines, and hormaomycin.35 However, none of these functionalizations is achieved by (sequential) methylation of proline residue, as they occur via cyclization and/or modification of another amino acid.36,37 Thus, the installation of an isobutyl moiety directly onto a proline residue represents a so far undescribed posttranslational modification. The hypothesis of sequential methylation of 15Pro is supported by the detection of a series of NosA (m/z 2505.8) analogs, namely compounds with molecular ions at m/z 2477.8, 2491.8, and 2519.8. MS2 experiments suggest that these congeners are identical except for the 15Pro residue (Table S6†). The observed 14 Da differences correspond to consecutive methylations leading to C2H5–, C3H7–, C4H9– (NosA) or C5H11 extensions of the 15Pro. Although the discovered NosA BGC was unique in comparison to known RiPP clusters, homologous BGCs were identified in several cyanobacterial and proteobacterial genomes (Fig. S32†). Notably, while variation was found in the majority of amino acid positions of the core peptide sequence, the N- and C-terminal amino acids and the 15Pro-16Ser-17Cys region located roughly in the middle of the peptide were invariant. This may indicate the importance of the 15Pro residue for the bioactivity of the compound.
The most prominent difference between HeLa WT and GK viability was recorded using 100 nM NosA even after long-term exposure (96 h) (Fig. 3C). Thus, the concentration of 100 nM was used in subsequent experiments. The calculated IC50 values for HeLa WT and GK cell lines at 72 h are shown in Table 1. The hemolytic assay detecting the release of hemoglobin after red blood cell damage38 demonstrated that NosA does not induce hemolysis, even at concentrations up to 800 nM (Fig. 3D). Based on these results, NosA seemed suitable for further characterization, as it may not cause general cytotoxicity.
Cell line (origin/classification) | IC50 (nM) | Effect (%) |
---|---|---|
HeLa S3 (cervix/adenocarcinoma) | 91 ± 15 | 2.6 ± 1.1 |
SJRH-30 (muscle/rhabdomyosarcoma) | 28 ± 1.7 | 5.4 ± 0.1 |
U-937 (pleural effusion/lymphoma) | 17 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 0.6 |
SW480 (colon/adenocarcinoma) | 22 ± 5.4 | 9.2 ± 0.7 |
HL-60 (blood/leukemia) | 54 ± 2.3 | 9.3 ± 0.2 |
HT-29 (colon/adenocarcinoma) | 22 ± 2.8 | 14 ± 4.7 |
D283 (brain/medulloblastoma) | 32 ± 1.7 | 14 ± 0.4 |
HCT-116 (colon/carcinoma) | 40 ± 19 | 14 ± 2.9 |
HEK-293 (kidney/immortalized) | 27 ± 2.4 | 23 ± 0.8 |
AsPC-1 (pancreas/adenocarcinoma) | 41 ± 3.6 | 24 ± 0.9 |
RKO (colon/carcinoma) | 17 ± 1.9 | 30 ± 0.4 |
MDA-MB-231 (breast/adenocarcinoma) | 20 ± 4.7 | 32 ± 20 |
Guinea-pig kidney (kidney/normal) | 143 ± 16 | 33 ± 9.6 |
RPE-1 (retina/normal-immortalized) | 19 ± 10 | 40 ± 6.2 |
BxPC-3 (pancreas/adenocarcinoma) | 56 ± 6.7 | 41 ± 1.6 |
K-562 (bone marrow/leukemia) | 53 ± 5.6 | 52 ± 1.2 |
Capan-2 (pancreas/adenocarcinoma) | 37 ± 10 | 53 ± 3.4 |
MCF-7 (breast/adenocarcinoma) | 10 ± 4.6 | 56 ± 0.9 |
BJ (foreskin/normal) | 69 ± 6.9 | 62 ± 1.2 |
Hep G2 (liver/carcinoma) | 30 ± 9.9 | 62 ± 2.6 |
DU 145 (prostate/carcinoma) | 35 ± 11 | 73 ± 0.2 |
U-2 OS (bone/osteosarcoma) | 22 ± 22 | 80 ± 9.7 |
Caov-3 (ovary/adenocarcinoma) | 29 ± 10 | 82 ± 1 |
The obtained IC50 values vary from 17 to 91 nM, indicating a strong cytotoxic potency of the compound (Table 1 and Fig. S33†). Lymphoma cells U-937, sarcoma cell line SJCHR-30, colon carcinoma cells HT-29, and SW480 were among the most sensitive cell lines. These cell lines exhibited low IC50 values and almost full inhibition at high NosA concentrations. On the other hand, most of the tested cancer and control immortalized cell lines or primary cells displayed only partial response with an efficacy of NosA between 25–70% (Table 1, effect in %). The least sensitive cell lines in our screening panel were prostate carcinoma DU-145, ovarian carcinoma CaOV-3, and osteosarcoma U2OS with very low efficacy resulting in viabilities over 70% in a broad concentration range.
The observed resistance of certain cells to NosA, characterized by variable efficacy in cell viability accompanied by minor changes in the potency (IC50) can be explained by different effects of NosA on cellular proliferation, delayed induction of cell death, or a shift of the cells toward a senescent phenotype. To shed a light on this observation, we performed a long-term experiment in RPE-1 cells. The cells were treated with NosA, and a washout/retreatment was performed at 72 h, followed by an additional 48 h of recovery/exposure. Low viability obtained at 120 h indicates that these cells responded to NosA with a substantial delay, rather than being resistant to the effect (Fig. S34†).
Concerning antimicrobial activity, NosA exhibited no effect against any of the tested fungal isolates in contrast to the potent effect in human cells, which suggests that NosA does not broadly act on all eukaryotic cells. Notably, NosA exhibited prominent activity against some gram-positive facultative pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus (MIC of 0.5ug/mL) and Streptococcus sanguinis (MIC of 1ug/mL) but not against Bacillus subtilis (gram-positive) and gram-negative bacteria (Table S7†). This indicates a specific antimicrobial effect of NosA that agrees with recent reports on RiPPs with the future potential of filling the gap in antibiotic discovery programs.1,39
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 NosA induces mitochondrial apoptosis, while not causing DNA damage or tubulin network alteration. (A) The cytostatic effect shown in HeLa WT cells treated by 100 nM NosA. Red arrows show apoptotic cell blebbing. (STS – stauroporine positive control, NC – negative control). (B) The immunolabeling of tubulin (green) in combination with nucleus staining (blue) in HeLa WT cells. (C) The caspase 3/7 activity of HeLa WT and Bax/Bak DKO cells treated by NosA and STS normalized to control. (D and E) PARP and γH2AX immunoblot of HeLa WT and Bax/Bak DKO cells after treatment with DMOS (Un.) or 100 nM NosA. (F) The viability of HeLa WT and Bax/Bak DKO after NosA treatment. For panels (C and F), the values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3. The full images of immunoblots are depicted in Fig. S38.† |
All these data clearly show that NosA induces cell cycle arrest before the induction of cell death. The progression of NosA-treated cells through the first mitotic division, as evidenced in the synchronized HeLa cells, also demonstrates that NosA does not belong to the group of tubulin-targeting compounds as many natural cytostatic metabolites such as vinca alkaloids, halicondrins, dolastatins, and taxanes.40,41 This is confirmed by the unchanged tubulin network after NosA treatment which is comparable to the negative control (Fig. 5B, and S16†), while tubulin-binding natural products cause typical morphological alteration such as bundle-like tubulin structures (taxol) or vast tubulin network depolymerization (monomethyl auristatin F) (Fig. S37†).
To verify if NosA triggers apoptosis, HeLa WT cells were treated with 100 nM of NosA or staurosporine (STS) as a potent apoptosis inducer, followed by microscopic analysis. Both STS and NosA induced cell shrinkage and blebbing (Fig. 5A). Activation of effector caspases 3/7 was monitored using a luminescence-based assay, in parallel to ATP production. Increased caspase 3/7 activity was observed in HeLa WT but not in HeLa Bax/Bak DKO (Fig. 5C), implying that apoptosis progresses through the mitochondrial pathway. An ATP assay performed on HeLa Bax/Bak DKO (40% viability after 72 h) revealed their higher resistance to cell death compared to the WT (20% viability after 72 h, Fig. 5F).
Moreover, cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting for the appearance of the cleaved variant of PARP1, a bona fide effector caspase substrate, along with a marker for DNA damage, γH2A.X. While PARP1 was cleaved and disappeared in HeLa WT cells (Fig. 5D), coinciding with an increase in γH2A.X (Fig. 5E), this was not seen in cells lacking BAX/BAK. Together, this documents the induction of mitochondrial apoptosis. The absence of γH2A.X in Bax/Bak DKO cells also indicates that NosA does not primarily cause DNA damage, as in such case γH2A.X activation would be Bax/Bak-independent.
NosA shows potent anti-proliferative activity in human cancer cells and selective anti-bacterial activity. Its selectivity and high potency predestine NosA for further preclinical studies to test its anti-cancer potential. Finally, the highly unusual structure of NosA offers a wide range of possibilities for combinatorial chemistry aimed at the development of new peptide drugs.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ob01395f |
‡ Authors contributed equally to the manuscript. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |