Shoi
Sasaki
a,
Hibiki
Ueno
a,
Noriyoshi
Arai
b,
Kouichi
Asakura
a and
Taisuke
Banno
*a
aDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan. E-mail: tbanno@keio.jp
bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-4-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan
First published on 4th February 2025
Vesicles, closed bilayer structures composed of amphiphiles, have attracted considerable attention as functional materials. Structural stability and stimulus responsiveness are required for next-generation functional vesicles. However, there is a dilemma between these properties because the desired membrane structure varies in terms of structural stability and stimulus sensitivity. Herein, we propose a new approach for the development of giant vesicles (GVs) through the molecular design and synthesis of amphiphiles with or without amide linkages, forming hydrogen bonding. From the 1H NMR analysis and fluorescence spectra of environment-responsive probes, intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the amide linkages in the membrane contributed to the enhanced structural stability of the GVs. Moreover, by adding amphiphiles containing a photoresponsive azobenzene moiety to GVs composed of amphiphiles with or without amide linkages, a distinct mechanism of photoresponsive deformation was observed: the former exhibited large and irreversible deformation, while the latter showed a modest and reversible manner due to the photoisomerisation of azobenzene under ultraviolet and subsequent visible light illumination. This difference was also attributed to the membrane structure affected by intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Based on these results, the finding provides a molecular methodology for developing highly functional vesicles.
Balancing structural stability and stimuli-responsiveness is crucial for creating functional vesicles.10 Vesicles with exceptional structural stability or specificity to target substances or tissues have been developed through chemical modification of their surfaces or by incorporating various compounds, such as synthesised functional molecules, into the vesicle membrane.11–14 Additionally, since Kunitake et al. reported that double-chain synthetic amphiphiles with quaternary ammonium salts form vesicles in water,15 synthesised amphiphiles based on rational molecular design have been frequently reported. For example, Sawada et al. demonstrated that vesicles composed of double-chain amphiphiles with imine linkages and oleic acid were stable over a wide pH range but rapidly collapsed below a certain pH threshold.10 Furthermore, it was reported that giant vesicles (GVs) composed of hydrolysable cationic lipids with amide linkages exhibit temperature-dependent deformation.16 Vesicles made from stimuli-responsive polymers can control the uptake and release of substances by altering the membrane structure.17,18 For instance, Che et al. reported polymersomes that could regulate membrane permeability depending on the protonation of a tertiary amine,19 while Liu et al. reported polymersomes that release doxorubicin in response to temperature changes.20 Other examples include controlling membrane permeability using gas or light as stimuli.21,22 Vesicles composed of polymers exhibit excellent structural stability but relatively slow response to stimuli, whereas those composed of low-molecular-weight molecules respond quickly to stimuli but have poor structural stability.23,24 Vesicles with excellent structural stability and high substance retention capacity are preferred because they minimize the frequency and amount of dosage, reducing the burden on the natural and in vivo environments.25 Additionally, sensitivity to stimuli, such as deformation and regulation of substance release and uptake when the concentration of target components increases, is crucial.26–29
In this study, we designed and synthesised low-molecular-weight amphiphiles with amide linkages in the hydrophobic moiety (MonoAm and DiAm), as illustrated in Fig. 1. The amide and diamide structures are expected to form a hydrogen bonding network within the relatively hydrophobic membrane, resulting in vesicles with a rigid membrane structure, i.e., excellent structural stability.30 As a comparative substance, an amphiphile without an amide linkage (NoAm) was also synthesised, and its stability was evaluated. We further incorporated an amphiphile with an azobenzene moiety (Azo18) into a series of vesicles and assessed their photoresponsiveness. Azobenzene undergoes reversible isomerization from the trans-isomer to the cis-isomer under ultraviolet light (UV), and then back to the trans-isomer under visible light (Vis) illumination. Vesicles containing amphiphiles with azobenzene groups have been found to deform,31–35 fuse,36 and collapse37 under light illumination, all due to changes in the membrane structure caused by the photoisomerisation of azobenzene. Therefore, vesicles composed of amphiphiles with or without amide linkages and Azo18 are expected to exhibit distinct photoresponsive behaviours depending on the properties of their membranes. Since this study focuses on the real-time responsivity against adding electrolytes and light illumination, we carry out observations of GVs. This study presents a molecular design strategy for amphiphiles that can adjust the balance between structural stability and stimulus responsiveness of vesicles.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of amphiphiles with amide linkages (MonoAm18, MonoAm16, and DiAm18), without amide linkages (NoAm18 and NoAm16), and the azobenzene moiety (Azo18). |
To investigate the photoresponsiveness of the GVs, specimens were prepared as follows: 10 mM solutions of MonoAm16 and Azo18 in chloroform, along with a 1 mM solution of Nile red, were prepared. MonoAm16, Azo18, and Nile red solutions were mixed in glass vials. The amphiphile film was obtained by evaporating the solutions under reduced pressure for more than 2 h. Then, 1 mL of deionised water was added to the glass vial, and the vial was left for 2 h at room temperature (23–25 °C) to hydrate the film. The vial was agitated using a vortex mixer to form GVs. The final concentrations were 2 mM MonoAm16/Azo18 = 1/1 (mM) and 1 μM Nile red. The specimens containing NoAm16 instead of MonoAm16 were prepared using a similar procedure.
The fluorescence intensity of vesicle dispersions containing Azo18 was also measured. The 2 mM amphiphile dispersion was sonicated for 2 min and extruded through a 0.8 μm pore-size polycarbonate membrane filter. The samples on a Petri dish were then illuminated with UV light and subsequently with Vis light for 5 min each. After illumination, a methanolic solution of Nile red was added. The final concentration of Nile red was 1 μM. The fluorescence intensity of these dispersions was measured using a fluorometer (RF-6000, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) at an excitation wavelength of 554 nm and a fluorescence wavelength range of 580 to 800 nm.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Microscopy images of GVs composed of (a) MonoAm18, (b) DiAm18, and (c) NoAm18, immediately after the sample preparation (left) and after 24 h (right). Scale bar: 20 μm. |
To investigate the structural stability of GVs composed of amphiphiles with amide linkages, osmotic stress was induced by adding NaCl as an osmolyte. The GVs were prepared using a droplet transfer method, a technique known to produce GVs with low lamellarity, which can influence vesicle stability.39,40 Unfortunately, GVs composed of MonoAm18 or DiAm18 were scarcely observed due to their low solubility in mineral oil. We thus carried out the time-course observation experiments under osmotic shock in three different trials for reproducibility. GVs composed of the amide-containing cationic amphiphiles MonoAm18 and DiAm18 survived in all the tested experiments, although shape changes occurred (Fig. 3a and b). Under osmotic shock, GVs composed of DiAm18 retained their spherical shape. In contrast, NoAm18-GVs completely collapsed within 60 min (Fig. 3c). GVs composed of MonoAm16 and NoAm16 showed similar tendencies to those of MonoAm18 and NoAm18, respectively (Fig. S3†). Additionally, similar experiments using KCl and MgCl2 were conducted. In the case of KCl and MgCl2, GVs composed of DiAm18 or MonoAm18 survived, and those composed of NoAm18 collapsed, which is consistent with the results using NaCl (Fig. S4 and S5†). These results strongly suggest that GVs composed of amide-containing MonoAm18 and DiAm18 have high stability to osmotic shock of various electrolytes.
Next, we investigated the formation of hydrogen bonds between the amide linkages in the amphiphiles within the vesicular membrane. 1H NMR analysis performed in deuterium chloroform showed that, depending on the concentration of amphiphiles, the protons near the amide linkages in DiAm18 and MonoAm18 slightly but steadily shifted (Fig. 3d and Fig. S7†), suggesting intermolecular hydrogen bonding within a relatively hydrophobic environment.
Here, let us discuss the structural stability of the GVs against osmotic shock. Due to osmosis, water moves from the outer to the inner water phase, increasing the volume of the GVs and causing membrane expansion. When the membrane structure is rigid, this expansion is suppressed, preventing rupture.42 Synthesised cationic amphiphiles form hydrogen bonds within the hydrophobic membrane, contributing to a more rigid membrane structure and suppression of bursting. In other words, the hydrogen bonding of amide-containing amphiphiles contributes to the stabilisation of GVs against osmotic shock. The shape changes in GVs composed of amide-containing amphiphiles may be attributed to directional hydrogen bonding (Fig. 2a).43 It is assumed that the reorientation of amide-containing amphiphiles within the vesicular membrane leads to the formation of new hydrogen bonding, causing changes in spontaneous curvature.44 The mechanism behind the formation of aggregates from GVs composed of DiAm18 is thus thought to be a planar lamellar structure attributed to a diamide skeleton. It is considered that the planar membrane structure is formed by intermolecular hydrogen bonding.45 The planar structure is thought to be unfavorable in forming vesicles because the vesicular membrane has curvature.46 Therefore, vesicles composed of amphiphilic molecules with a diamide skeleton are considered to be kinetically unstable and transformed into thermodynamically stable aggregates. Given the high stability observed in vesicles composed of MonoAm-type amphiphiles, further investigations into their photoresponsiveness under light illumination were conducted.
Based on these results, the shape changes of the GVs could be attributed to the photoisomerisation of azobenzene-containing amphiphiles. Photoisomerisation of Azo18 in the vesicular membrane was estimated using UV-Vis absorption spectra. The vesicle dispersions were illuminated and then diluted with methanol to prepare the sample solution for absorption spectrum measurements. In samples containing MonoAm16 and NoAm16, reversible trans–cis photoisomerisation was confirmed (Fig. 4g and h). Furthermore, we measured the time-course of Azo18 absorbance in both samples. The rate of photoisomerisation of Azo18 was similar for GVs composed of both MonoAm16 and NoAm16 (Fig. 4i). The slower deformation of the GVs composed of MonoAm16 might be due to a more rigid membrane structure caused by intermolecular hydrogen bonding (Fig. S7†). Additionally, the turbidity of dispersion of Azo18 did not change during UV illumination, suggesting that cis-Azo18 is not water-soluble and is not released from the vesicular membrane during UV illumination (Fig. S12†).
To confirm the temperature increase caused by UV illumination, we monitored the temperature distribution on glass coverslips illuminated by UV light at 0.1 mW cm−2 using a thermal imaging camera. After 5 min of UV illumination, a 2.4 K temperature increase was observed in the glass coverslips (Fig. S13†). Given the high specific heat capacity of water relative to that of borosilicate glass, such a slight temperature increase due to light illumination is considered negligible.
Initially, the fluorescence spectra of Nile red in vesicle dispersions were recorded to investigate the effects of adding Azo18 to the MonoAm16 and NoAm16 vesicles on the vesicular structure. Nile red is an environmentally responsive probe used to characterize the properties of various molecular assemblies.47,48 The fluorescence intensity and maximum fluorescence wavelength of Nile red are sensitive to the surrounding environment; fluorescence intensity decreases, and maximum wavelength increases when the probe is in a polar medium.49–51 The addition of Azo18 to MonoAm16 vesicles resulted in a red shift of the maximum wavelength (from 629 nm to 633 nm) (Fig. 5a and b), indicating that the vesicular membrane becomes softer. This softening may be due to the interruption of hydrogen bonding between MonoAm16 molecules by Azo18. In contrast, no shift in the maximum wavelength was observed at 637 nm upon the addition of Azo18 to NoAm16 vesicles, suggesting no significant changes in intermolecular interactions between the amphiphilic molecules (Fig. 5a and c).
The properties of the membrane before and after light illumination were estimated using Nile red. Before illumination, the fluorescence intensity of Nile red in vesicles composed of NoAm16 was lower than that in those composed of MonoAm16. Additionally, the maximum fluorescence wavelength for MonoAm16 was shorter than that for NoAm16 (Fig. 5d). These results suggest that water components were more likely incorporated into the vesicular membrane of NoAm16 than those of MonoAm16, indicating that the vesicular membrane containing MonoAm16 was more tightly packed due to intermolecular hydrogen bonding. After UV illumination, the fluorescence intensity decreased in both types of vesicles. This decrease is attributed to the change in the molecular structure of Azo18 into a bulky cis-isomer, which leads to looser packing of the membrane, allowing easier permeation of water and, thus, a decrease in fluorescence intensity. Following Vis illumination, the fluorescence intensity of the vesicles containing NoAm16 returned to its original value. However, in the case of MonoAm16, the intensity increased but did not ultimately return to the original level. This suggests that the membrane structure of the vesicles containing MonoAm16 shifted from its initial state to a different state during light illumination.
Therefore, to estimate how the membrane structure varied, FRET analysis was conducted using NBD-PE and Texas Red DHPE as the donor and acceptor, respectively. These fluorescent probes are not considered readily miscible due to the different unsaturated and saturated hydrophobic moieties.52 FRET efficiency increases with a shorter distance between the donor and acceptor within the vesicular membrane.53,54 Before light illumination, the fluorescence intensity of Texas Red-DHPE in the vesicles of MonoAm16 was higher than in those of NoAm16 (Fig. 5e), indicating tighter packing in the MonoAm16 membrane. After UV illumination, the fluorescence intensity of Texas red-DHPE decreased in both samples. Under subsequent Vis illumination, the fluorescence intensity was higher than in the initial state. To elucidate the fluorescence properties of NBD-PE and Texas-red DHPE without the effect of synthesized cationic amphiphiles, fluorescence spectra of vesicles composed of POPC and NBD-PE or Texas red-DHPE were measured. It was found that NBD-PE and Texas red-DHPE were photobleached during light illumination (Fig. S14 and S15†). Nevertheless, the higher intensity after Vis illumination suggests that the distance between the acceptor and donor was reduced because FRET is sensitive to the distance between the donor and the acceptor.53,54 This implies that the mixing degree of amphiphiles in the membrane changed due to the disturbance of the membrane structure during the photoisomerisation of Azo18.37
The results of Fig. 5d and e suggest that the membrane structure varies as follows. The mixing degree of MonoAm16 and Azo18 is low before light illumination, forming hydrogen bonding networks in the membrane. This indicates a rigid membrane structure. Under UV illumination, water components easily inflow to the vesicular membrane due to the photoisomerisation from the trans-isomer to the cis-isomer of Azo18, which partially breaks hydrogen bonding networks. Through UV illumination, the mixing degree of MonoAm16 and Azo18 is high since the membrane fluidity becomes high. Under subsequent Vis illumination, though the mixing degree does not vary, the hydrogen bonding between MonoAm16 molecules partially reforms, accompanied by the release of water components, due to the reverse photoisomerization of Azo18. The MonoAm16-GV membrane after UV and Vis illumination is thus softer than that before light illumination (Fig. 6).
Here, C1 and C2 are the two principal curvatures and C0 is the spontaneous curvature, introduced to account for potential asymmetry in the bilayers. κ and κG denote the local and Gaussian bending constants, respectively. The second term of the equation can be neglected when no changes in vesicle topology occur.42 The phase diagram of the equilibrium shape, based on the spontaneous curvature model, is determined by two parameters: the reduced volume v and the reduced spontaneous curvature c0. The reduced volume v is calculated as follows
R0 = (A/4π)1/2 |
c0 = C0R0. |
It is estimated that introducing Azo18 into the membrane itself does not affect the membrane curvature because spherical GVs are observed before light illumination when Azo18 is added to the vesicles. Under UV illumination, the photoisomerisation of Azo18 from the trans-isomer to the bulky cis-isomer increases the membrane surface area A because the cis-isomer occupies a larger area in the membrane.35 This may decrease v. Moreover, photoisomerisation from the trans-isomer to the cis-isomer disrupts the orientation of amphiphiles, leading to membrane reorganisation37 and a change in spontaneous curvature C0.55 Therefore, the transformation occurs from spherical to non-spherical GVs. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding between MonoAm16 molecules causes further changes in the molecular orientation within the membrane due to its directionality, resulting in larger deformation. Membrane reorganisation also affords changes in the mixing degree within the membrane. Under subsequent Vis illumination, photoisomerisation of Azo18 from the cis-isomer to the trans-isomer occurs, leading to an instantaneous increase in v. As a result, the membrane structure of GVs containing NoAm16 returns to its original state after UV and subsequent Vis illumination, transforming from non-spherical back to spherical because the membrane of NoAm16-GVs is soft. On the other hand, a part of hydrogen bonding within the MonoAm16-GV membrane is quickly reformed after Vis illumination, resulting in a relatively rigid membrane (Fig. 6). Therefore, due to this reorganised membrane structure, their deformed non-spherical shape maintains.
Overall, the introduction of amide linkages provides both high structural stability and sensitive photoresponsiveness of vesicles. These findings may provide the molecular strategy of balancing contradictory properties, stability and sensitivity, and potentially contribute to the development of highly functional vesicles.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5nr00151j |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |