Ashoka S†
*a,
Revanna M L
a,
Shamshad Begum S
a,
Raju C Ab,
Mounika Patiballac,
Babu Rajaram Mohan Ray
d,
Vasantha Kumari Re,
Vijayalaxmi K G
a,
R. S. Upendra
f and
R. Karthikf
aDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
bSubject Matter Specialist, ICAR-CMFRI, KVK, Lakshadweep, India
cNutrihub, Indian Institute of Millet Research, Hyderabad, India
dDepartment of Processing and Food Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
eDepartment of Horticulture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
fDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, REVA University, Bangalore, India
First published on 7th August 2025
Muffins are popular baked products that can be fortified nutritionally incorporating high-fibre natural flours such as millet, lotus dried flower flour, and flours obtained from by-products of fruits and vegetables. Also, the increasing demand for healthier food choices prompted the exploration of functional ingredients that can improve the nutritional profile of baked goods. A deep insight into the connected literature has highlighted the applications of various alternative flours in baked products as nutritional fortifying agents, but very limited research was documented, specifically on the use of lotus dried flower flour in muffin formulations. Consequently, the present research aimed to examine the potential of lotus dried flower flour as a source of dietary fibre in muffin preparations, focusing on the nutritional quality (physical and sensory attributes) and consumer acceptability of the developed muffins. Muffins were made using a combination of refined wheat flour and lotus-dried flower flour in comparison with 100% refined wheat flour muffins (control). The flour ratios used were 95% Refined Wheat Flour (RWF) to 5% Lotus Flower Flour (LFF) i.e., (T1), 90% RWF to 10% LFF i.e., (T2), and 80% RWF to 20% LFF (T3). The physical, textural, nutritional, and sensory properties, shelf life, and consumer acceptability of the developed muffins were investigated. The sensory evaluation revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, with overall acceptability (OAA) scores decreasing from 8.73 ± 0.49 in the control to 7.21 ± 0.60 in T3. The T2 formulation (10% LFF) maintained high acceptability with an OAA score of 8.26 ± 0.60. In contrast, colour analysis showed a darkening effect and shifts towards reddish and bluish hues. Physical characteristics revealed increased baking loss and altered texture as the level of lotus flour increased. Nutritional analysis indicated higher ash content (0.91 g vs. 0.83 g) and crude fibre (2.33 g vs. 1.97 g) in LFF muffins compared to the control, with minimal changes in energy content (366.96 kcal vs. 370.69 kcal). With this, the study concludes that lotus flower flour can effectively replace up to 10% of wheat flour in muffin preparation without compromising sensory and nutritional quality, making it a viable option for nutritionally enriched product development.
Sustainability spotlightIn this study, we explored how dried lotus flower flour, a fibre-rich ingredient, can contribute to healthier muffin formulations. We partially replaced regular wheat flour with lotus flower flour and assessed the impact on the muffins' quality, including both measurable and perceived attributes, nutritional value, and shelf life. Our results showed that incorporating up to 10% lotus flower flour improved the muffins' nutritional profile without compromising quality. This suggests that lotus flower flour holds promise as a sustainable and functional ingredient in bakery products. Our work connects well with global goals like: SDG 2 (Zero Hunger): this research supports SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) by contributing to the development of more nutritious food products and by promoting the use of underutilised plant species such as lotus flower. SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being): by supporting healthier eating. SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production): by sustainably using natural, plant-based ingredients. |
The incorporation of nutrient-dense plant foods with therapeutic properties is necessary for addressing consumer requirements and benefits. Effective supplementation of cereal products with an underutilized edible plant such as lotus is one of the promising approaches to address consumer nutritional demands while bringing wellness to the user.3 Lotus is taxonomically classified as Nelumbo nucifera and is a functional aquatic edible plant variety that has been cultivated and consumed for thousands of years, across the globe and predominantly in the Asian continent. The edible parts of the lotus plant i.e. roots, seeds, leaves, and flowers provide a wide range of culinary and nutritional benefits. Incorporating dried lotus flower flour into muffin recipes is a novel approach to enhancing the dietary fibre content of a popular baked product such as a muffin. Research has shown that wheat-based muffins typically have low nutrient density, mainly in dietary fibre, which is considered to be vital for maintaining health and also aids in preventing several chronic diseases, including hypercholesterolemia and colon cancer.4 Muffins are a favourite bakery product among consumers, owing to their soft texture and delicious taste. Nevertheless, muffins have a low nutrient density, as they are high in sugar and fat but low in dietary fibre.5,6 Literature studies envisaged that various plant-based ingredients can replace wheat flour in muffin recipes, leading to improved nutritional profiles of the product, without sacrificing the sensory attributes.7
For example, the addition of dietary fibre from kimchi by-products at 1–5 per cent has been shown to enhance the fibre content of muffins while preserving acceptable sensory properties.4 Incorporating different forms of dietary fibre into muffin compositions is a potential way to boost their health benefits while retaining their appealing attributes. Recent research has demonstrated that a variety of plant-based components, including vegetable and fruit byproducts, could efficiently substitute standard wheat flour, resulting in muffins with increased fibre content and better nutritional properties. The approach is consistent with the growing trend of employing food industry byproducts to generate enriched products that are healthier.8 Lotus dried flower flour is an excellent substitute for conventional flour in muffin recipes due to its high dietary fibre content (11.73 g/100 g) and notable nutritional values particularly rich in essential minerals such as calcium (880.93 mg kg−1), potassium (5040.84 mg kg−1), magnesium (1524.83 mg kg−1), and iron (290.30 mg kg−1), while also providing a good protein content (7.42 g/100 g) and low fat (0.54 g/100 g).9,10 Understanding the research hitherto stated, it is proposed that lotus-dried flower flour could potentially be utilized in baked products as a blend with other flours. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the possible efficacy of incorporating lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) dried flower flour into muffin preparation and further examine the physical, nutritional, and sensory qualities of muffins prepared with dried lotus flower flour. The findings will provide insights into the use of lotus flower flour as a dietary supplement and nutritious ingredient in muffin preparations, thereby enhancing both health benefits and customer acceptance.
Sl. no. | Ingredients | Quantity (g) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
a C = control (0% LFFM), T1 = 5% LFFM, T2 = 10% LFFM, T3 = 20% LFFM. | |||||
1 | Refined wheat flour | 50 | 47.50 | 45 | 40 |
2 | Lotus flower flour | — | 2.50 | 5 | 10 |
3 | Sugar | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
4 | Fat | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
5 | Egg | 1 no. | 1 no. | 1 no. | 1 no. |
6 | Milk powder | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
7 | Vanilla essence | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
8 | Baking powder | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
![]() | (1) |
For consumer acceptability, the best accepted products were served to the consumers to test the general acceptance pattern. Consumers were randomly selected and distributed the products to find out the level of acceptance by using a five-point hedonic scale (from 1 – ‘Poor’ to 5 – ‘Excellent) for the attributes like appearance, taste, texture, flavour and overall acceptability.
CHO (g/100 g) = 100 − [protein (g) + fat (g) + ash (g) + moisture (g)] | (2) |
Energy (kcal) = [protein (g) × 4] + [carbohydrate (g) × 4] + [fat (g) × 9] | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
Muffin | L* | a* | b* | c | h | ΔE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Means with different letters in superscript within a column differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05), C = control (0% LFFM), T1 = 5% LFFM, T2 = 10% LFFM, T3 = 20% LFFM, L* = lightness; a* = redness; b* = yellowness, c = chroma, h = hue, ΔE = colour difference. | ||||||
Control | 70.10 ± 1.38a | 0.29 ± 0.02d | 18.26 ± 0.40b | 18.60 ± 0.15c | 89.33 ± 1.34a | 35.26 ± 0.96d |
T1 | 50.40 ± 1.32b | 3.50 ± 0.12c | 17.70 ± 0.45b | 18.26 ± 0.32c | 79.00 ± 1.51b | 52.83 ± 1.16c |
T2 | 47.20 ± 1.75c | 6.70 ± 0.22a | 19.66 ± 0.75a | 20.60 ± 0.45a | 71.06 ± 1.77c | 56.73 ± 1.47a |
T3 | 49.43 ± 1.27b | 6.30 ± 0.14b | 19.00 ± 0.26ab | 20.00 ± 0.43b | 71.73 ± 0.95c | 54.40 ± 0.65b |
Three different treatment groups (T1, T2, and T3) were evaluated. Notably, all treatment group's L* values declined as compared to the control, suggesting a darker appearance. The muffin with T2 had the darkest appearance among all the muffins examined, shown by its lowest L* value of 47.20. The reduction in the L* value from control to T3 is most likely due to the presence of anthocyanin pigment in the lotus dried flower flour. Many fruits and vegetables have red, purple, and blue hues representing the presence of a rich antioxidant flavonoid named anthocyanins. Furthermore, there was a shift toward more reddish and blue hues in the treatment groups, as indicated by an increase in the a* and b* values. T2 exhibited a shift toward red and blue colours, with the highest b* value (19.66) and highest a* value (6.70).
As the amount of lotus dried flower flour increased, c values of the muffins all declined from the control to T3, suggesting that the muffins became less saturated. The anthocyanins in lotus dried flower flour may interact with other ingredients in the muffin batter, such as proteins or carbohydrates, to form complexes. This interaction is suggested by the reduction in the c value from the control to the T3 group, indicating that complex formation can lead to a decrease in the colour intensity of the muffins. However, with the addition of lotus flower flour, the dominant wavelength of the muffins did not change considerably, as evidenced by the h values of the muffins remaining relatively consistent. The comparatively stable h values of the muffins indicate that the addition of lotus dried flower flour did not significantly alter the dominant wavelength of the muffins. This implies that lotus dried flower flour's anthocyanins do not absorb light at a particular wavelength. The total colour differences (ΔE) for the treatment groups (T1, T2, and T3) were 52.83, 56.73, and 54.40, respectively, when compared to the control muffin. The increase in ΔE values from the control to T3 suggests that the muffins became darkened compared to the standard white colour, as the amount of lotus dried flower flour increased. The darkened nature of developed muffins is likely due to the combined effects of the decrease in L* and c values, respectively.
A study17 investigated the qualitative parameters of cookies made with lotus dried leaf powder. The results showed that adding lotus dried leaf flour to cookies decreased the L* and c* values, suggesting that lotus leaf flour darkens cookies and makes them less saturated. Another study18 investigated the effects of anthocyanin-rich popping maize flour on the phenolic profile, antioxidant capacity, and the physical and sensory properties of bread, highlighting its potential to enhance both quality and nutritional value. Study results showed that anthocyanin-rich maize flour changed the breadcrumb colour to a brick-red range. Replacement of 30% of wheat flour with wholegrain blue and dark-red popping maize flour rich in phenolic compounds improved the functional profiles of the end product by increasing the content of total phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and phenolic acids in maize mixed bread. The study envisaged that, despite thermal degradation during baking, anthocyanins from maize flour could significantly contribute to the health benefits of bread, as well as its desirable colour. The present results were in accordance with the mentioned study and a similar trend was observed with respect to the colour indicating that colour played a significant role because of the pigments present on the LFF.
Therefore, the findings indicate that the LFF incorporated in the muffins had a considerable impact on the colour and the muffins were found to be less saturated and darker. An increase in the content of LFF causes the change of colour of muffins from the usual white to a darkened colour. The colour properties of LFFM may be influenced by various treatments. These findings can assist in evaluating consumer acceptance of the product. Additionally, the presence of anthocyanins in lotus dried flower flour contributes notable health benefits.
Sample | Baking loss (%) |
---|---|
a Means with different letters in superscript within a column differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05), * = significant, C = control (0% LFFM), T1 = 5% LFFM, T2 = 10% LFFM, T3 = 20% LFFM. SEm± = standard error of mean, CD @ 5% = critical difference at 5% level. | |
C | 19.66 ± 3.34a |
T1 | 26.31 ± 4.84ab |
T2 | 26.25 ± 4.37ab |
T3 | 33.9 ± 5.28a |
F-Value | * |
SEm± | 2.61 |
CD @ 5% | 8.64 |
The T3, with 20% LFFM, had the highest baking loss, while T1 and T2, with 5% and 10% LFFM, exhibited relatively comparable baking losses. This behaviour is consistent with studies on other non-wheat flours, such as Perilla leaves powder, where baking loss increased proportionally with higher additive concentrations.19 The higher baking loss in muffins with LFF could be attributed to the greater water absorption capacity of lotus flower flour, which results in more moisture being lost during baking. Additionally, the presence of LFF in the batter may have interfered with the formation of the gluten network, leading to a weaker structure and greater baking loss.
Muffin | Hardness (N) | Fracturability (N) | Springiness | Cohesiveness | Gumminess (N) | Chewiness (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Different superscripts in the same columns are statistically significant (p < 0.05). | ||||||
Control | 304.76 ± 2.35d | 2.81 ± 0.05a | 0.343 ± 0.003d | 0.258 ± 0.001b | 78.76 ± 0.48d | 27.01 ± 0.50d |
T1 | 321.26 ± 0.92c | — | 0.977 ± 0.001a | 0.363 ± 0.002a | 116.68 ± 0.45c | 114.04 ± 0.25a |
T2 | 544.64 ± 2.31b | — | 0.514 ± 0.003b | 0.318 ± 0.001ab | 173.22 ± 1.68b | 89.06 ± 0.32c |
T3 | 731.82 ± 2.46a | 0.37 ± 0.01b | 0.429 ± 0.002c | 0.356 ± 0.001a | 260.66 ± 0.64a | 111.71 ± 0.43b |
It is observed from the study that the properties vital for muffin quality i.e. cohesiveness (0.258 to 0.363), gumminess (78.76 to 260.66), and chewiness (27.01 to 114.04) increased with higher LFFM incorporation levels. Springiness values measure the capacity of muffins to recover their original shape after compression. Increasing springiness values of the tested samples T1, T2, and T3 (0.977, 0.514, and 0.429) suggested an increase in elasticity of muffins in comparison with the control muffin's springiness values (0.343) representing the quality of the developed muffins over the control. It is observed from the studies that the muffins became less elastic and more brittle as the LFF content increased, demonstrated a decrease in springiness values.
Increasing LFF content also increased the chewiness and gumminess, probably due to LFF having a high fibre content, which helps produce a denser, more compact structure by binding with water molecules. The texture of muffins might be changed by adding LFF, and the inclusion of LFF makes muffins denser, less springy, less cohesive, gummier, and chewier. Interaction of LFF with other proteins and gluten in the muffin mix might be the cause of these variations in textural properties.
Variation | Appearance | Texture | Colour | Flavour | Taste | Consistency | OAA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Different superscripts in the same columns are statistically significant (p < 0.05), * = significant, C = control (0% LFFM), T1 = 5% LFFM, T2 = 10% LFFM, T3 = 20% LFFM, OAA – overall acceptability. | |||||||
C | 8.85 ± 0.35a | 8.66 ± 0.57a | 8.71 ± 0.46a | 8.71 ± 0.64a | 8.66 ± 0.55a | 8.66 ± 0.48a | 8.73 ± 0.49a |
T1 | 8.23 ± 0.62b | 8.02 ± 0.74b | 8.30 ± 0.51b | 8.11 ± 0.54b | 8.00 ± 0.65b | 7.92 ± 0.74b | 8.09 ± 0.56b |
T2 | 7.54 ± 0.77c | 7.85 ± 0.79b | 7.54 ± 0.63c | 8.19 ± 0.67b | 8.16 ± 0.65b | 7.92 ± 0.85b | 8.26 ± 0.60b |
T3 | 7.14 ± 0.85c | 7.19 ± 0.82c | 7.07 ± 0.67d | 7.21 ± 0.60c | 7.27 ± 0.54c | 7.19 ± 0.76c | 7.21 ± 0.60c |
Mean ± SD | 7.94 ± 0.93 | 7.93 ± 0.90 | 7.91 ± 0.85 | 8.05 ± 0.81 | 8.03 ± 0.77 | 7.92 ± 0.88 | 8.07 ± 0.78 |
F-Value | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
SEm± | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.33 |
CD @ 5% | 1.10 | 1.21 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.17 | 0.92 |
The colour scores of all groups were likewise relatively high; the control group scored the highest (8.71 ± 0.46), whereas the group with 20% LFF scored the lowest (7.07 ± 0.67). As the percentage of LFF increased, flavour and taste scores showed a more significant decrease. The addition of lotus flower flour (LFF) influenced the sensory attributes of flavour and taste in the muffins. The control group had the highest scores for both attributes, with scores of 8.71 ± 0.64 and 8.66 ± 0.55, respectively. The group with 20% LFF had the lowest scores for both attributes, representing scores of 7.21 ± 0.60 and 7.27 ± 0.54, respectively. This reduction may be attributed to the characteristic earthy or floral notes introduced by LFF, which could be less familiar or desirable to some panellists. The consistency scores followed a similar trend, with the control group having the highest score of 8.66 ± 0.48 and the group with 20% LFF having the lowest score of 7.19 ± 0.76. A decrease in overall acceptance has also been reported in muffins formulated with alternative plant-based ingredients, such as legumes, potentially due to changes in taste and flavour.21 While the specific sensory profiles differ, a similar downward trend in overall acceptance was observed in the present study with increasing levels of lotus flower flour, likely reflecting a shift in flavour and texture perception among consumers.
Overall, the sensory evaluation results suggested that the addition of LFF to muffins negatively affects their sensory attributes, with the highest scores observed in the control group containing 0% LFF. However, the muffins scored relatively high for all the attributes, including the muffins prepared with 20% LFF. Hence, results indicated that LFFM can be used to make muffins with acceptable sensory characteristics at replacement levels of wheat flour up to 10%. Muffins are considered a sweet baked good, which often compensates for the bitterness of whole wheat flour. However, studies have shown that the addition of ingredients with fibre broadly reduces sweetness and flavour intensity in muffin formulations.22 This might be the reason that the LFF having more fibre content caused the sensory attributes to decrease as its incorporation increased in the muffin. Dietary fibre can increase the density of baked goods and make them less tender.
Nutrients | Control | LFFM |
---|---|---|
a Different superscripts in the same row are statistically significant (p < 0.05), all values are expressed as g/100 g of sample, except energy (kcal). *Carbohydrates and energy values are computed. | ||
Moisture (%) | 25.43 ± 0.20a | 24.56 ± 0.22b |
Protein (g) | 5.35 ± 0.04a | 4.86 ± 0.03b |
Fat (g) | 15.61 ± 0.25a | 15.52 ± 0.20a |
Ash (g) | 0.83 ± 0.02b | 0.91 ± 0.01a |
Crude fibre (g) | 1.97 ± 0.02b | 2.33 ± 0.07a |
Carbohydrates* (g) | 52.20 ± 0.26a | 51.96 ± 0.15a |
Energy* (kcal) | 370.69 ± 0.65a | 366.96 ± 0.41b |
Interestingly, the LFF based muffin has a slightly higher ash content (0.91 g) and crude fibre content (2.33 g) than the control, indicating a potential benefit in terms of mineral and dietary fibre intake. However, the LFF muffins had a carbohydrate content of 51.96 g, as well as a lower energy value (366.96 kcal) in comparison with the control. The nutrient composition of Hibiscus cake is as follows: total carbohydrates (45.86 g), protein (6.45 g), fat (23.95 g), fibre (0.64 g) and moisture (21.40 g) content.23 The present study showed on-par nutrient content in comparison with results obtained from the study,23 principally due to the incorporation of LFF.
Elements | Control | LFFM |
---|---|---|
Aluminium (Al) | 24.54 | 51.70 |
Boron (B) | 0.00 | 25.43 |
Calcium (Ca) | 793.48 | 1474.91 |
Copper (Cu) | 0.37 | 1.63 |
Iron (Fe) | 16.24 | 16.75 |
Potassium (K) | 1502.96 | 2527.25 |
Magnesium (Mg) | 211.68 | 366.43 |
Sodium (Na) | 1719.12 | 1894.33 |
Lead (Pb) | 0.62 | 0.68 |
Strontium (Sr) | 1.63 | 4.61 |
However, the microelements, iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) contents, in LFFM are slightly elevated at 16.75 mg kg−1 and 1.63 mg kg−1, respectively, compared to 16.24 mg kg−1 and 0.37 mg kg−1 in the control. No changes were observed in zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), or chromium (Cr) levels. Although the variations might not be significant, microelements are important for enzymatic activity and health in general and enhance the nutritional value of LFFM. Furthermore, both the LFFM and control muffins exhibit very low concentrations of harmful metals like lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and cobalt (Co). This ensures the safety of consuming LFF muffins concerning heavy metal contamination.
Storage days | Moisture (g) | Peroxide value (mEqO2 per kg) | Free fatty acids (% of oleic acid) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | LFFM | Control | LFFM | Control | LFFM | |
a Means with different letters in superscript within a column differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05). | ||||||
Initial day | 25.43 ± 0.42a | 24.56 ± 0.27a | 12.71 ± 0.20c | 11.84 ± 0.18c | 2.34 ± 0.032a | 2.29 ± 0.16a |
5th day | 23.48 ± 0.37b | 22.40 ± 0.26b | 13.47 ± 0.22b | 12.59 ± 0.25b | 1.58 ± 0.24b | 1.38 ± 0.14b |
10th day | 22.60 ± 0.37c | 21.30 ± 0.16c | 14.50 ± 0.12a | 13.52 ± 0.41a | 1.47 ± 0.16b | 1.25 ± 0.06b |
A study24 investigated the sensory and physical qualities of muffins manufactured with waxy whole wheat flour. The amount of moisture was found to be higher on the initial day than on all subsequent sample days but eventually remained constant across all formulations. For example, control muffins at day 0 had 38.0 gH2O/100 g. By day 4, the moisture had decreased to 34.7 gH2O/100 g. A similar trend was observed in the present study. It has been found that most baked goods experience a rapid decrease of moisture in the first 24 h to 36 h of storage and have much smaller changes in moisture during the further stages of product storage.25,26
The peroxide value (PV) is an indicator of lipid oxidation. PV values of the tested muffins showed a significant increase during the 10 days of storage. The initial PV was 12.71 ± 0.20 mEqO2 per kg, which increased to 13.47 ± 0.22 mEqO2 per kg on the 5th day and 14.50 ± 0.12 mEqO2 per kg on the 10th day, due to the complex interactions between the various components of the muffins, such as fats, proteins, and antioxidants. Among both samples, the muffins supplemented with LFF showed lower peroxide values throughout the storage period than the control sample. A higher peroxide value indicates auto-oxidations of fat present in muffins. Also, it might be due to the antioxidant properties of LFF, and comparatively lower peroxide value regarding the control. Significant variations were found in peroxide value concerning storage conditions and storage period. The present study results agreed with the study investigating the effect of storage on the PV of guar flour-supplemented muffins.27 The results showed that the PV values of the muffins increased with storage, but the increase was lower in the guar flour-supplemented muffins compared to the control. Inference suggests that the antioxidant properties of guar flour might be responsible for the lower PV in the supplemented muffins.
The free fatty acid (FFA) content of LFFM, which is another indicator of lipid oxidation, showed a significant decrease during storage. The initial FFA value of 2.34 ± 0.032 decreased to 1.47 ± 0.16 on the 10th day attributed to the consumption of free fatty acids during the initial stages of lipid oxidation.
The overall results of the present investigation are compatible with the study28 findings since the PV of the LFFM samples increased significantly during storage. However, the decrease in moisture content and increase in PV and FFA readings can be attributed to the sample's oxidation while being stored.
Storage days | Total bacterial count (CFU g−1) | Fungi count (CFU g−1) | Coliform count (CFU g−1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | LFFM | Control | LFFM | Control | LFFM | |
a ND = not detected. | ||||||
Initial day | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
5th day | 45 | 34 | 23 | 29 | ND | ND |
10th day | 72 | 67 | 52 | 56 | ND | ND |
By the tenth day of storage, a further increase in microbial load was recorded. The total bacterial count in the control muffins rose to 72 CFU g−1, whereas the LFF muffins displayed a slightly lower count of 67 CFU g−1. Similarly, the fungal counts increased to 52 CFU g−1 in the control and 56 CFU g−1 in LFF muffins. Coliform counts remained non-detectable in both cases throughout the storage. Despite this rise, the values remained well below established safety limits. According to microbial quality standards for bakery products, aerobic plate counts should not exceed 5 to 6log10 CFU g−1 (i.e., 100
000–1
000
000 CFU g−1)29 and according to the generic microbiological standard for cakes and pastries, which was published by the Institute of Food Science and Technology (IFST), yeast and mold counts must remain below 5
log10 CFU g−1 (100
000 CFU g−1) and 4
log10 CFU g−1 (10
000 CFU g−1), respectively.30 The microbial loads in both control and LFF muffins at all time points were significantly below these thresholds, confirming that the muffins were safe for consumption up to 10 days of storage. These findings suggest that prolonged storage can lead to a gradual increase in the microbial populations in muffins, with LFF muffins showing microbial counts comparable to or slightly lower than the control muffins.
Microbiological study of the muffins revealed an increase in microbial growth as the number of days of storage increased. This could be due to contamination with the raw materials, processing, handling, storage methods, or an increase in moisture content during storage. The bacterial and mold population was lower than that of the control throughout the storage period, which may again be attributed to the anthocyanins present in LFF. However, both the control and muffins incorporated with 10% LFF were safe for consumption for up to 10 days, according to the results. Usually, bakery products are packaged in plastic films after baking and cooling, and they are consumed within 1 or 2 months. Furthermore, post-process contamination is unavoidable.31
Product | Duration | Appearance | Texture | Colour | Flavour | Taste | Consistency | OAA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Within each muffin type (control or LFFM), means in the same column with different superscript letters differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05) over the storage period. OAA = overall acceptability. | ||||||||
Control | Initial day | 8.85 ± 0.35a | 8.66 ± 0.57a | 8.71 ± 0.46a | 8.71 ± 0.64a | 8.66 ± 0.55a | 8.28 ± 0.48a | 8.73 ± 0.49a |
5th day | 8.09 ± 0.76b | 7.95 ± 0.58b | 8.23 ± 0.58b | 8.00 ± 0.54b | 7.97 ± 0.58b | 7.90 ± 0.60b | 7.97 ± 0.55b | |
10th day | 7.95 ± 0.77b | 7.73 ± 0.84b | 8.00 ± 0.72b | 7.73 ± 0.64b | 7.69 ± 0.67b | 7.71 ± 0.76b | 7.71 ± 0.66b | |
LFFM | Initial day | 7.54 ± 0.77a | 7.85 ± 0.79a | 7.54 ± 0.63a | 8.19 ± 0.67a | 8.16 ± 0.65a | 7.92 ± 0.85a | 8.26 ± 0.60a |
5th day | 7.33 ± 0.48a | 7.31 ± 0.51b | 7.26 ± 0.73ab | 7.71 ± 0.58b | 7.88 ± 0.65a | 7.50 ± 0.47ab | 7.78 ± 0.60b | |
10th day | 7.14 ± 0.85a | 7.19 ± 0.82b | 7.07 ± 0.67b | 7.21 ± 0.60c | 7.27 ± 0.54b | 7.19 ± 0.76b | 7.21 ± 0.60c |
The results revealed that the control group, on the initial day, exhibited high sensory ratings in all aspects, with appearance, texture, colour, flavour, taste, consistency, and overall acceptability scoring approximately 8.85, 8.66, 8.71, 8.71, 8.66, 8.28, and 8.73, respectively. However, as storage increased to the fifth and tenth days, sensory parameters declined with all variables exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Notably, the appearance and texture ratings declined most significantly, reaching 8.09 and 7.95 on the fifth day and then falling to 7.95 and 7.73 on the tenth day, respectively. The findings imply that long-term storage has a detrimental effect on LFF muffin's sensory attributes. Comparatively, the LFFM product group had equivalent initial sensory scores for flavour, taste, consistency, and overall acceptability but slightly lower scores for appearance, texture, and colour. The sensory quality of the LFF muffins declined with time, with the texture experiencing the greatest reduction, reaching 7.31 on the fifth day and 7.19 on the tenth. By the fifth and tenth days of storage, the control group sensory scores had significantly decreased. Similar patterns were observed in the LFFM product group, indicating that both products are subject to sensory decline while storage.
These results were in line with the studies reporting that organoleptic characteristics drastically declined during the storage studies in muffins and cakes which might be due to the growth of fungus, moisture, storage conditions, etc.32,33
Footnote |
† Presently at Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Agriculture, V C Farm, Mandya, India, ashokafsn@gmail.com, +91 9538796225. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |