Issue 6, 2025

Chemical and electrochemical coagulation processes as a tertiary treatment for residual phosphate removal from domestic wastewater: effect of operating parameters and calculation of operating cost

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare the treatment efficiency and techno-economic analysis of chemical coagulation (CC) and electrocoagulation (EC) processes for residual phosphate (PO43−–P) removal from a secondary domestic wastewater treatment plant. The effect of two different coagulants (FeCl3 and alum) and different pH values was evaluated in the CC process. On the other hand, the effect of different metal scrap anodes (Fe, Al, and hybrid Fe + Al), applied current (i = 0.1–0.4 A), and charge loading (q = C L−1 or F m−3) were evaluated in the EC process. In the CC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.7% PO43−–P was obtained with 0.5 kg FeCl3 m−3 and pH = 7.5. However, in the EC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.9% PO43−–P was obtained with Fe scrap anodes under optimum conditions (EC time = 15 min, i = 0.4 A, and q = 6 C L−1 or 3.73 F m−3). The removal capacity and metal/PO43−–P molar ratios in the CC process were calculated as 85.7 mg PO43−–P g−1 Fe and 19.8 mol mol−1 for FeCl3, and 218.9 mg PO43−–P g−1 Al and 7.7 mol mol−1 for alum, respectively. On the other hand, the EC process was calculated as 85.0 mg PO43−–P g−1 Fe and 20.0 mol mol−1 for Fe scrap, 132.5 mg PO43−–P g−1 Al and 26.6 mol mol−1 for Al scrap, and 84.1 mg PO43−–P g−1 Fe + Al and 13.6 mol mol−1 for Fe + Al scrap, respectively. At the end of the study, total operating costs ($ per m3 and $ per kg PO43−–P) were calculated for both processes. The results of the study showed that using Fe scrap anodes with the EC process for PO43−–P removal results in higher removal efficiencies and lower operating costs.

Graphical abstract: Chemical and electrochemical coagulation processes as a tertiary treatment for residual phosphate removal from domestic wastewater: effect of operating parameters and calculation of operating cost

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
14 Jan 2025
Accepted
08 May 2025
First published
10 May 2025

Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2025,11, 1554-1567

Chemical and electrochemical coagulation processes as a tertiary treatment for residual phosphate removal from domestic wastewater: effect of operating parameters and calculation of operating cost

N. A. Akhtar, M. Kobya and E. Gengec, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2025, 11, 1554 DOI: 10.1039/D5EW00047E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements