Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: CO residence time modulates multi-carbon formation rates in a zero-gap Cu based CO2 electrolyzer
Siddhartha
Subramanian
*a,
Jesse
Kok
a,
Pratik
Gholkar
c,
Asvin Sajeev
Kumar
b,
Hugo-Pieter Iglesias
van Montfort
a,
Ruud
Kortlever
b,
Atsushi
Urakawa
c,
Bernard
Dam
a and
Thomas
Burdyny
*a
aMaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage (MECS), Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft 2629 HZ, The Netherlands. E-mail: siddhartha.subramanian92@gmail.com; T.E.Burdyny@tudelft.nl
bLarge Scale Energy Storage, Process and Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2628 CB, The Netherlands
cCatalysis Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, Delft 2629 HZ, The Netherlands
First published on 4th June 2025
Abstract
Correction for ‘CO residence time modulates multi-carbon formation rates in a zero-gap Cu based CO2 electrolyzer’ by Siddhartha Subramanian et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 6728–6738, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE02004A.
In Fig. 4(e) on page 6733 of this article, the legends in the graph for faradaic efficiency of CO and C2+ were misplaced. The original figure should be replaced with an updated one. Note that this correction does not have any impact on the main idea and conclusion of this article. The updated Fig. 4 is as follows.
 | ||
| Fig. 1 (a) Non-electrochemical negative tracer RTD results for serpentine and parallel flow fields at tracer flow rates of 50 sccm showing longer residence times for parallel flow fields as a result of lower convective forces. (b) A qualitative comparison of the RTD results as a function of flow rate and flow field. (c) A qualitative assessment of the CO pooling inside the catalyst layer during CO2 electrolysis as a function of flow rate and flow field. (d) Faradaic efficiency of products obtained from ECO2R in an MEA cell at 10 sccm and 200 mA cm−2 for serpentine, parallel and interdigitated flow fields. (e) Comparable CO and C2+ product selectivity for varied flow rates and flow fields. The inset (red line) shows the calculated CO2 utilization efficiencies. Error bars represent the mean and standard deviation of triplicate experiments. | ||
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |