Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

An imidazolium dication affords a stable UWY-like zeolite and enables a subtle structure direction towards EMM-17

Huajian Yu ab, Peng Lu a, Zihao Rei Gao§ *a, Alvaro Blanco a and Miguel A. Camblor *a
aInstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM), CSIC, 28049 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: macamblor@icmm.csic.es
bEscuela de Doctorado, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain

Received 16th June 2025 , Accepted 12th July 2025

First published on 14th July 2025


Abstract

Zeolites with interconnected medium (10Ring) and large (12R) pores, such as the UWY framework type, hold significant potential for catalysis but may suffer from instability due to a high germanium content required for their synthesis. Addressing this limitation, we report the synthesis of HPM-9, a novel UWY-like germanosilicate zeolite, utilizing 1,1′-(1,8-octanediyl)bis(3-methylimidazolium) (8BMI) as the organic structure-directing agent (OSDA) in fluoride media. HPM-9 achieves significantly lower germanium content (Gef = Ge/(Ge + Si) down to 0.14) compared to the original IM-20 (Gef = 0.3), resulting in markedly improved stability upon calcination and exposure to water. Structural analysis using synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction (SPXRD) suggested disorder and DIFFaX simulations revealed that HPM-9 exhibits minimal stacking faults along the a-axis, corresponding to an intergrowth with a polymorph where double four-membered rings (d4r) are partially replaced by single four-membered rings (s4r), likely driven by the reduced Ge content. Furthermore, decreasing the Ge content further (Gef ≤ 0.05) subtly shifts the structure direction towards EMM-17, a zeolite featuring interconnected 11R and 10R pores. 19F MAS NMR suggests the presence of d4r units in the synthesized EMM-17, and we propose a mechanism where the less stable d4r-containing polymorph C nucleates first, templating the subsequent growth of d4r-free polymorphs A and B by epitaxial intergrowth. Comparative studies with analogous OSDAs (7BMI and 9BMI) confirmed the optimal linker length of 8BMI for directing towards stable UWY structures. The enhanced stability of HPM-9 opens avenues for the practical application of UWY-type zeolites in catalysis.


Introduction

Zeolites, with their varied complex frameworks and widely diverse applications, have been at the forefront of research in materials science and catalysis for decades. The possibility to fine-tune properties for specific applications has driven the ongoing quest for new zeolite topologies and compositions.1 One of the key factors influencing zeolite performance is the size and dimensionality of their pores. Medium pore zeolites, characterized by rings of 10 tetrahedra (10R) as minimum apertures along the diffusion path, typically exhibit shape selectivity, which is crucial in catalytic reactions where specific molecular sizes and shapes need to be accommodated and/or diffuse. In contrast, large pore zeolites with 12-membered rings (12R) facilitate enhanced molecular diffusion, allowing for the processing of larger molecules. Zeolites that combine intersecting medium and large pores have garnered significant interest due to their potential to offer a unique combination of reactivity, selectivity, and stability.2

The UWY zeolite framework type,3 whose reference material is zeolite IM-20,4 is a prime example of such a zeolite. It features intersecting 12R and 10R pores, making it an attractive candidate for various catalytic applications. For instance, a hypothetical Ge-free aluminosilicate UWY zeolite has been proposed as a potential catalyst for the transalkylation of trimethylbenzene with toluene.5 However, despite its potential there has been little further research on the synthesis and applications of IM-20. The original synthesis of IM-20 involves a relatively high germanium content (Gef = Ge/(Ge + Si) = 0.4 in the gel, 0.3 in the product), which compromises its stability. A newer report on the synthesis of this type of zeolite as nanosheets did not advance from this point of view, while demonstrated both the potential of the material for biomass conversion and the low stability issue.6 The UWY topology contains abundant double four-membered rings (d4r), known to be strained for pure silica compositions. Such structures are generally only accessible by increasing the flexibility of the SiO2 framework by introducing fluoride in the synthesis, with fluoride lowering the covalent character of the Si–O bond and being trapped inside the d4r.7,8 Alternatively, or simultaneously, introduction of Ge helps stabilizing d4r structures due to the sharper T–O–T angles and longer T–O bonds upon isomorphous substitution of Si by Ge as a tetrahedral T atom.9 Thus, the potential applicability of UWY zeolites demands new synthesis routes that can produce stable UWY zeolites with low Ge content capable of withstanding calcination and exposure to ambient conditions without degradation.

This study addresses this challenge through the synthesis of HPM-9, a novel UWY-like zeolite with a significantly lower germanium content (Gef down to 0.14) and an improved stability upon calcination and exposure to water. Interestingly, the organic structure-directing agent (OSDA) used in its synthesis, 1,1′-(1,8-octanediyl)bis(3-methylimidazolium) (8BMI), is formally a dimer of the one reported for IM-20 (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium) (Scheme 1).


image file: d5dt01413a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Five OSDAs relevant to this work: (a) 8BMI [1,1′-(1,8-octanediyl)bis(3-methylimidazolium)] used to synthesize stable HPM-9 (UWY), (b) 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium used in the original synthesis of IM-20 (UWY) in ref. 4. (c) 1-Methyl-4-(pyrrolidinyl)pyridinium used for the discovery of aluminosilicate EMM-17 in ref. 10, and two OSDA's related to 8BMI used here for comparison (d) 7BMI [1,1′-(1,7-heptanediyl)bis(3-methylimidazolium)], (e) 9BMI [1,1′-(1,9-nonanediyl)bis(3-methylimidazolium)].

Additionally, we found a subtle but very interesting structure-direction effect under certain conditions at an even lower Gef in the gel, which lead to the formation of EMM-17, a zeolite with interconnected large 11R and medium 10R pores.10 A mechanistic hypothesis, based on the existence of polymorph C, is proposed to explain this.

Experimental

OSDA synthesis

8BMI: 12.316 g (150 mmol, 2eq.) 1-methylimidazole (Fluorochem, 99%) was added with 250 mL acetonitrile (Scharlau, HPLC grade) into a flask under magnetic stirring. After 20.402 g (75 mmol, 1 eq.) 1,8-dibromooctane (Aldrich, 98%) was added, the system was refluxed for 4d. The crude product was collected by evaporating the solvent and it was purified by dissolving in water followed by washing with diethyl ether (100 ml × 3). The purity of 8BMI dibromide salt was determined by LNMR in DMSO-d6 (1H NMR (300 MHz): δ 9.35 (s, 2H), 7.89 (s, 2H), 7.78 (s, 2H), 4.18 (t, 4H), 3.80 (s, 6H), 1.67 (m, 4H), 1.08 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (75 MHz): δ136.64, 123.74, 122.57, 49.16, 36.49, 29.75, 28.35, 25.57). Using the same procedure but adding 1,7-dibromoheptane (Aldrich, 95%) and 1,9-dibromononane (Aldrich, 98%) instead of 1,8-dibromooctane we obtained 7BMI and 9BMI, respectively. 7BMI, DMSO-d6, 300 MHz, 1H NMR: δ 9.42 (s, 2H), 7.95 (s, 2H), 7.83 (s, 2H), 4.18 (t, 4H), 3.87 (s, 6H), 1.66 (m, 4H), 1.04 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz): δ 136.73, 123.72, 122.54, 49.06, 36.53, 29.63, 27.84, 25.41. 9BMI, DMSO-d6, 300 MHz, 1H NMR: δ 9.52 (s, 2H), 7.98 (s, 2H), 7.87(s, 2H), 4.20 (t, 4H), 3.89 (s, 6H), 1.72 (m, 4H), 1.13 (m, 10H); 13C NMR (75 MHz): δ136.88, 123.84, 122.66, 49.09, 36.38, 29.85, 28.92, 28.59, 25.76.

Anion exchange

35 mmol 8BMIBr (7BMIBr, 9BMIBr) was dissolved in deionized water with 140 mL resin (hydroxide form, Amberlite IRN78, 1.1 meq mL−1 by wetted bed volume) under stirring overnight. The solution was filtered and the resin washed with deionized water (until neutral). The obtained solution was then concentrated by evaporation and the final concentration of OSDA(OH)2 was determined by titration of OH with 0.1261 M HCl (aq.)

Zeolite synthesis

Stable HPM-9 was discovered by high-throughput experiments involving 8BMI, fluoride and Ge by varying Gef, OH/T, H2O/T, OH/F, temperature, and crystallization time. Pure HPM-9 was obtained in a synthetic gel with a composition of 0.25 OSDA(OH)2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.5HF[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.1GeO2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.9 SiO2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]10H2O heated at 160 °C for 7 days. When Gef decreased to 0.05 and 0.025, EMM-17 was obtained as main phase with trace amount impurities from a gel with composition of 0.25 OSDA(OH)2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.5HF[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.05 or 0.025 GeO2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.95 or 0.975 SiO2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]10H2O heated at 160 °C for 12 days. The detailed synthesis results of all the experiments are listed in Tables S1 and S2.

In a typical synthesis, GeO2 was dissolved in 8BMI(OH)2 ([OH] = 0.2344 mmol g−1) and stirred few hours until the solution became clear. Then, TEOS was added to the solution and the mixture was stirred overnight for hydrolysis while all the ethanol and some water were allowed to evaporate. Subsequently, HF was added into the mixture, then the beaker was placed into a 90 °C oven for evaporating excess water. When the weight of the beaker reached the targeted amount, the mixture was stirred by hand to make it as homogeneous as possible before putting it into an autoclave. The autoclave was placed at 160 °C in a static oven for 7 d (or 12 d for EMM-17). After that, the product was collected by filtration and washed with deionized water and acetone.

Characterization

Laboratory powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD, Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer, Cu Kα, λ = 1.5418 Å) was used to identify the zeolite phases. For better data quality, we collected synchrotron PXRD datasets (SPXRD) at the Spanish synchrotron light source (ALBA, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, BL04-MSPD) in capillary mode. CHN elemental analysis of as-made zeolites was measured on a LECO CHNS-932 analyzer. Thermogravimetric and differential thermal analyses (TG-DTA) were performed on a TA SDT Q600 thermal analyzer, 10 °C min−1 up to 1000 °C, 100 mL min−1 air. FE-SEM (Field-emission electron microscopy) and EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, Genesis XM2i detector) were used to check zeolite morphology and determine its Gef on a FEI Nova NanoSEM 230 microscope. Liquid nuclear magnetic resonance (LNMR, 1H and 13C) spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance III-HD Nanobay 300 MHz and a Bruker 300 MHz. Multinuclear (1H, 13C, 19F and 29Si) solid-state magic angle spinning (MAS) spectra were acquired on Bruker AV-400-WB equipment and the detailed experimental conditions have been reported elsewhere.8 The Ar adsorption isotherm was obtained at 87 K in a Quantachrome Autosorb iQ.

Rietveld refinement of a calcined HPM-9 with a measured Gef = 0.2 (0.15 in the synthesis mixture) was performed against SPXRD data (λ = 0.49587 Å) using the GSAS-II suite.11 The starting model was obtained from IZA-SC3 by assuming Ge atoms (Gef = 0.2, 12 Ge per uc) are distributed evenly in 10 T atoms. 22 coefficients were used to fit the background with a Chebyschev-1 function. A pseudo-Voigt function (U, V, W, X, Y), uniaxial size model and generalized microstrain model were used for peak-shape fitting before the structure refinement. Sample displacement to beam and unit cell were varied during Rietveld refinement. 40 bond soft restraints (T–O:1.68 Å) and 88 angle soft restraints (O–T–O: 109.54°, T–O–T: 145°) were applied. Several constraints were used including that Si and Ge atoms in the same T atoms site have the same coordinates, the sum of their occupancies were constrained to 1, all O, Si and Ge atoms have same displacement parameter and there were a total of 12 Ge atoms per unit cell. After peak-shape fitting and atom coordinate refinement, the occupancies of T atoms and displacement parameters were refined and the occupancy of Ge was fixed to 0 if it became negative during refinement.

Results and discussion

HPM-9 synthesis and characterization

Tables S1 and S2 list the synthesis results. In the absence of Ge (Table S1), the synthesis with or without Al is dominated by MFI type zeolites (and/or MFI-MEL intergrowths), a default zeolite not demanding of a strong structure-direction effect. Experiments with Ge were then performed (Table S2), using a lower temperature to favour less dense phases. Most experiments were done in static conditions to overcome the limited number of rotation sites in our ovens. Using Ge we first discovered HPM-9, later recognized as a zeolite with UWY topology. The Gef of HPM-9 is typically slightly larger than that in the synthesis mixture for low Gef and slightly lower for high Gef, while at a Gef of 0.3 both values are similar. Interestingly, we were able to get HPM-9 at Gef values much lower than those reported for IM-20, the reference material for this topology.4,6 While IM-20 had a reported Gef = 0.3 (0.4 in the gel) and after calcination requires storage under dry conditions to prevent degradation,4 HPM-9 with a Gef of 0.14 determined by EDS (0.1 in the gel) can withstand calcination and exposure to ambient air without structural degradation, making it a more viable candidate for industrial applications (Fig. 1). The measured BET area of HPM-9 is 445 m2 g−1. The calcined zeolite is also stable after immersion in water for one hour.
image file: d5dt01413a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 PXRD of (from bottom) HPM-9 as-made, calcined and calcined and exposed to ambient air for 6 days. By contrast, HPM-9 with higher Gef significantly degraded upon calcination and air exposure (Fig. S1).

UWY contains a large number of d4r (two crystallographically different d4r amounting to 3 d4r per unit cell of 60 T, with 24 T sites belonging to d4r), known to be favored by both F and Ge.7,9,12,13 The 19F MAS NMR spectra of three HPM-9 samples with Gef = 0.14, 0.31 and 0.41 show only resonances in the 0 to −40 ppm chemical shift range, corresponding to F occluded in d4r. For a Gef of 0.14 (8.4 Ge per uc) the spectrum contains three resonances at −40, −21 and −10 ppm, corresponding to F anions occluded in d4r of types I, II and III, respectively.14 Their relative intensities are approximately 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]6, respectively. If there were a 100% preference of Ge for T sites in d4r and Ge were equally distributed among the d4r, then an average of 2.8 Ge per d4r could be calculated (0.14 × 60/3). For a random distribution of Ge among all T sites the average would be 1.1 Ge per d4r (24 × 0.14/3). Since resonance I corresponds to F in d4r with no Ge, its presence in this HPM-9 with Gef = 0.14 suggests the distribution of Ge among T sites but also among d4r is not random (Fig. 2) and demonstrate the existence of a non-negligible content of pure silica d4r in this HPM-9 (around 10% if all d4r are occupied by fluoride). Additionally, this suggests Ge pairing are somehow favored at that Gef because site type III (Ge pairs with no more than 2 Ge neighbors) occurs while there are still d4r with a low Ge content (type II, non-paired Ge) or no Ge at all (type I, no Ge). On the contrary, when the Gef is increased to 0.3 in the gel (0.31 in the zeolite, 18.6 Ge per uc) and 0.5 (0.41 in the zeolite, 24.6 Ge per uc), resonances I and II disappear and only resonance III (implying between two and six Ge per d4r) is observed. Resonance III is symmetric in both samples and can be fitted with a single Gaussian peak. This is also the resonance reported in the original IM-20 (−8.9 ppm, attributed in that report to Ge in a d4r containing five Ge).4 For a Gef = 0.41, the number of Ge atoms per unit cell (24.6) already surpasses the number of available T sites in d4r (24) and, despite that fact, resonance IV (at least one Ge with at least 3 Ge neighbors) is still not present (it should appear at a chemical shift between those of resonances II and III, at around −14 ppm). Hence, these results suggest there may be a tendency to avoid extensive Ge pairing in UWY even at relatively high loadings. An avoidance of Ge pairing has been proposed in AST only for Gef < 0.5,15 while it was discarded in STW, where Ge pairings appeared even at very low Gef below 0.1.14 This suggests Ge pairing in zeolites might be highly structure dependent. The fact that we observe a tendency to pairing at low Gef (0.14) and a tendency to avoid pairings at high Gef may indicate that the preference of Ge for sites in d4r is not very strong in UWY. A caveat about this conclusion is that resonances III and IV might perhaps appear in UWY at chemical shifts too close to distinguish between them. The general observations discussed above (a tendency of Ge to cluster at low Gef and a topology-dependent clustering) appear to agree with the conclusions of a recent analysis of the Ge distribution in zeolites using neural network potentials.16


image file: d5dt01413a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 19F MAS NMR spectra of HPM-9 with (from bottom to top) Gef = 0.14, Gef = 0.31, and Gef = 0.41. Chemical shifts of the resonances are marked. Peaks at −9/−10 ppm, −21 ppm, and −40 ppm correspond to resonances type III, II, and I, respectively, of the F anion occluded in d4r.14

The morphology of the HPM-9 crystals varies along with variations of Gef and water/T ratio in the gel. HPM-9 tends to crystallize in the form of round hollow aggregates composed of small plaques randomly interpenetrated (Gef = 0.1, water/T = 10, Fig. 3b). However, upon dilution (Gef = 0.1, water/T = 15), interpenetrated larger plaques are formed instead (Fig. 3c). At high Gef very small needles are formed (Fig. 3d) while we have also obtained “house of cards” aggregates at very low Gef (Gef = 0.05, water/T = 10, Fig. 3a). The corresponding PXRD patterns are shown in Fig. S2.


image file: d5dt01413a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 The very different morphologies observed in the synthesized HPM-9 at 160 °C (OSDA/T = F/T = 0.5) as a function of the Gef and/or water/T ratio in the gel: (a) house of cards (under rotation with Gef = 0.05, water/T = 10; the sample contains traces of MFI and/or TON not observed here), (b) hollow spherical aggregates of thin plaques (static, Gef = 0.1, water/T = 10), (c) much thicker interpenetrated plaques by dilution (static, Gef = 0.1, water/T = 15, contains traces of TON), and (d) needles (as in b but increasing the Gef to 0.3; a further increase to Gef = 0.5 gives similar crystals).

The 13C MAS NMR spectrum of as-made HPM-9 matches well with the liquid NMR spectrum of the OSDA (Fig. S3), indicating the OSDA is intact after the synthesis. This was also proved by CHN element analysis, where the C/N ratio of the as-synthesized HPM-9 (4.0, Table 1) matches well with the calculated C/N ratio of the OSDA (C16N4H28, C/N = 4). Organics and fluoride can be removed by calcination, most of it between 250 and 450 °C (Fig. S4) in an exothermic process (Fig. S5).

Table 1 Chemical composition of HPM-9 and EMM-17
Phase wt% Molar ratiosa wt%b Unit cella
N C H C/N H/N TG residue
a The C/N and H/N values for the 8BMI dication are 4 and 7, respectively. b The expected value according to the composition in the last column is written within parenthesis. The organic content of these materials continuously decreases upon washing suggesting strong adsorption in the outer surface.
HPM-9 Gef 0.14 2.66 9.06 1.50 3.97 7.85 82.9(83.6) (C16N4H28(F,OH)2)2.26(H2O)3.84[Si51.6Ge8.4O120]
EMM-17 Gef 0.045 2.85 10.04 1.78 4.11 8.74 82.54(80.8) (C16N4H28(F,OH)2)4.71(H2O)16.19[Si114Ge6O240]


We then performed 29Si direct polarization (DP) and 29Si{1H} cross polarization (CP) MAS NMR measurements on both the as-made and calcined HPM-9 (Gef = 0.14). For the as-made HPM-9, its DP spectrum possess a broad, featureless resonance ranging from −100 to −120 ppm (Fig. 4a). Because of the existence of Ge in tetrahedral framework positions, the resonances of neighboring Si shift to lower field, which is common in germanosilicate zeolites. The 29Si{1H} CP spectrum with short contact time (0.5 ms) and longer scanning (8192 runs accumulation because of the poor intensity at short contact time, Fig. 4c) indicates at least five resonances in the range of −110 ppm to −120 ppm, plus another resonance at around −126 ppm, assigned to penta-coordinated Si in [S with combining low line][i with combining low line](OT)4F.17 The possible existence of Q3 sites, i.e. [S with combining low line][i with combining low line](OSi)3(OH), cannot be ascertained because most H is contributed by the OSDA itself in the as-made zeolite sample. After calcination, the 29Si DP spectrum possess three resonances, a small broad hump at −102 ppm, plus two stronger overlapped resonances at −110 ppm and −114 ppm (Fig. 4d). The one at −102 ppm was proved to be Q3 sites by the CP spectrum (Fig. 4e) while the other two are Q4 sites, where it is not possible to discern individual [S with combining low line][i with combining low line](OSi)4 and [S with combining low line][i with combining low line](OGe)(OSi)3 species. Considering the spectrum (e) in Fig. 4, the Q3 site concentration must be very low in the calcined HPM-9, suggesting a good integrity after calcination of the zeolite with low Ge content, in agreement with PXRD results (Fig. 1).


image file: d5dt01413a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 29Si MAS NMR study of HPM-9: 29Si direct polarization (DP) spectrum of as-made HPM-9 (a), 29Si{1H} cross-polarization (CP) spectra of as-made HPM-9 with long (6 ms) (b) and short (0.5 ms) contact time (c), 29Si DP spectrum of calcined HPM-9 (d), and 29Si{1H} CP spectrum of calcined HPM-9 with 6 ms contact time (e). Numbers of scans for spectra (a–e): 952, 1024, 8192, 965, 2048 runs, respectively. Relaxation delays for spectra (a–e): 60, 5, 5, 60, 5 seconds, respectively.

Structural analysis of calcined HPM-9

After Rietveld refinement of HPM-9 against SPXRD data the refined Ge distribution basically agree with our conclusions from MAS NMR (vide supra). The two crystallographically different d4r have the same Ge content (2.4 Ge per d4r, amounting to 7.2 Ge) and there are 4.8 additional atoms dispersed in 4 T atoms outside d4r, supporting the idea that there is a tendency to avoid Ge pairings in UWY. Three sites outside d4r (sites T4, T7 and T8) have no Ge. However, the overall refinement failed to produce a completely satisfactory fit. While the numerical indicators (Rwp = 7.38%, GoF = 2.65) were relatively good, the Rietveld plot (Fig. 5) was indicative of problems in the structural model.18 A detailed analysis showed that most of the peaks were broad, while (0, k, l) reflections were significantly sharper and this could not be adequately modeled by using anisotropic peak broadening strategies in GSAS-II. Additionally, the difference trace in Fig. 5 revealed that the position of the Bragg reflections were not consistently precise along the full profile. These observations suggested the presence of stacking faults along the a direction. Examination of the UWY framework type revealed a possible stacking fault scheme where d4r along these direction were occasionally converted into single 4 rings (s4r) (Fig. 6). This would result in modulations of the a parameter that could account for the observations. This problem was tackled using DIFFaX, a program that calculates diffraction intensities from crystals faulted in one direction.19 First, a fully ordered zeolite in which the concerned d4r were converted to s4r was built (Fig. 6). The resulting framework (polymorph B of HPM-9) contains medium 10R pores along the three crystallographic directions and was found to be topologically identical to the proposed polymorph A of zeolite ECNU-13, a disordered material that was very recently reported and whose synthesis makes use of the “monomer” 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium.20
image file: d5dt01413a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Observed (purple +) and calculated (green solid line) synchrotron powder X-ray diffractograms for calcined HPM-9 refined in space group Pmmm. Vertical marks indicate the positions of allowed reflections. The cyan trace is the difference plot. The high angle region is also shown with expanded intensity (15×). λ = 0.49587 Å.

image file: d5dt01413a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 The structures of UWY (A) and polymorph B (ECNU-13)(B) of the HPM-9 structure.

The coincidence of both framework types (polymorph A of ECNU-13 and polymorph B of HPM-9) has been confirmed by analysis of their coordination sequences using Kriber.21 Then, both UWY and the new ordered zeolite were reoriented to have the stacking direction along c and DIFFaX files were constructed to simulate random intergrowths of both frameworks. The patterns obtained for different stacking probabilities (implying different proportions of both polymorphs) are depicted in Fig. S6, where we can observe that at both extremes the simulated patterns agree well with the patterns of the ordered polymorphs simulated with VESTA software.22 At intermediate probabilities the patterns are as expected: (0, k, l) reflections (Miller indexes according to the UWY orientation in the IZA database)4 are much sharper and are unaffected in position by the probability of intergrowth, while any other reflection moves to higher 2θ angles and becomes broader as the proportion of the polymorph A of ECNU-13 increases. As shown in Fig. 7, the experimental pattern for HPM-9 agrees well with a disordered intergrown material with a very high proportion of UWY (estimated as around 95%). Given the stabilizing role that Ge exerts on d4r, the appearance of the kind of intergrowth observed, which imply a decrease in d4r units, is very likely a consequence of the decrease in the Gef.


image file: d5dt01413a-f7.tif
Fig. 7 DIFFaX simulated XRD patterns (λ = 0.49587 Å) for UWY-ECNU-13A intergrowths at high UWY proportions (thin traces, from bottom to top the UWY content is 99, 97.5, 95, 92.5, 90, 87.5, 85 and 82.5%). The thick red trace corresponds to the experimental SPXRD. For the whole UWY-ECNU-13A range, please check Fig. S6.

EMM-17 synthesis and characterization

Under certain conditions at very low Gef in the gel (0.05 and 0.025) we obtained zeolite EMM-17 (see Fig. S8). This zeolite, which has interesting catalytic potential and also contains large (11R) and medium (10R) pore intersections,10 is one of the rare “odd zeolites”, i.e. those containing odd-membered pores.23 In our syntheses EMM-17 frequently appears with trace impurities of zeolite TON or MFI. This structure-direction effect toward EMM-17 at very low Ge contents is intriguing because while Ge is known to structure-direct towards structures containing d4r, the reported EMM-17 topology is an intergrowth of two dominant polymorphs (A and B) that are devoid of such units. A third polymorph containing d4r units, polymorph C, was first proposed as hypothetical and later suggested to exist very minoritarily by high resolution electron microscopy.24 The structure of the three polymorphs of EMM-17 are compared in Fig. S7. Notably, the 19F MAS NMR spectroscopy in Fig. 8 reveals the presence of a small but significant concentration of d4r in our EMM-17 zeolite (resonances I and II at −39 and −20 ppm, respectively) indirectly but strongly suggesting the existence of the less stable polymorph C (MFI and TON appearing as impurities, often at trace levels, don't contain d4r). This discovery enables us to propose, at a hypothetical level, a mechanistic explanation for the observed structure-direction effect: presumably, F (and Ge) initially help the nucleation of the less stable d4r-containing polymorph C, while this phase promotes in turn the subsequent formation of polymorphs A and B by epitaxial intergrowth (Fig. 9).25 The Gef of EMM-17 measured by EDS is a bit larger in the zeolite (0.045) than in the gel (0.025).
image file: d5dt01413a-f8.tif
Fig. 8 19F MAS NMR spectrum of as-made EMM-17 using 8BMI as the OSDA at Gef 0.025. Resonances at −20 and −39 ppm correspond to types II and I, respectively, of F anions within d4r units while resonances at −53, −59, and −64 ppm are assigned to F anions confined within [4354] cages.

image file: d5dt01413a-f9.tif
Fig. 9 Proposed mechanism for the crystallization of EMM-17 in this work. The presence of Ge and mostly F favours the nucleation of polymorph C of EMM-17 (left) which then grew to EMM-17 disordered materials by epitaxial intergrowth.

The much larger intensity of the resonance of type I compared to type II suggests the main d4r promoting effect is exerted by fluoride rather than Ge. However, when the Gef is decreased or increased, other phases (MFI and TON or HPM-9, respectively) compete. The high field signals observed in Fig. 8 at −53, −59 and −64 ppm can be unambiguously attributed to fluoride occluded in the [4354] cage present in the three EMM-17 polymorphs,26 although the −64 ppm resonance could also have a very minor contribution of F occluded in the [415262] cage in trace MFI.27 Resonances in similar chemical shift ranges are consistently attributed to F in [4354] cages in several zeolites, including Beta (−58, −65, −70 ppm), STT (−56, −69 ppm) or IFR (−68 ppm).

At Gef = 0.025 our EMM-17 crystallizes in the form of very thin interpenetrated flakes giving the overall shape of a grain of rice, which we call “rice of cards” by analogy to the house of cards terminology (Fig. 10a and b). That morphology is markedly different from the reported ones,10,24 with thicker plates that may interpenetrate without giving the regular overall morphology observed in our material. At a Gef = 0.05 our EMM-17 has the form of very small flakes aggregated in formations reminiscent of desert roses (Fig. 10c and d).


image file: d5dt01413a-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Two typical morphologies found for EMM-17 synthesized using 8BMI: the rice of cards obtained at Gef = 0.025 (a and b) and the desert roses crystallized at Gef = 0.05 (c and d). In d, a TON impurity (as suggested by PXRD) is also observed.

Ill-crystallized phases and ITT

Both EMM-17 and HPM-9 appear to crystallize better at low concentrations (relatively high water/T ratios). In Table S2 several phases are listed as ill-crystallized (IC), although it is likely that the ill-defined PXRD patterns are just a consequence of a very small crystal size in the nanometer range. We have identified three different types of IC phases, ICa to ICc. PXRD of representatives of each IC group are shown in Fig. S9 and representative SEM images are shown in Fig. S10. ICa are most likely nanosized HPM-9 and/or EMM-17. This is not only supported by the PXRD patterns but also from the infrared spectra in the region of framework vibrations, which may sometimes reveal the crystalline nature of nanophases better than the PXRD, as was clearly shown for instance in the case of nanozeolite Beta.28 As shown in Fig. S11, the spectra of all the ill-crystallized materials are rather similar and suggestive of crystalline zeolitic materials containing organic material, specially when compared with the IR spectrum of EMM-17. These ill-crystallized or nanosized phases are more frequent at low water contents and/or high Gef, suggesting nucleation under those conditions is fast while crystal growth is comparatively slow.

At a Gef of 0.5 and above a well-crystallized germanosilicate ITT zeolite starts to compete for crystallization.29 This zeolite contains interconnected extra-large (18R) and medium (10R) pores and its well crystallized nature is evident in the PXRD pattern (Fig. S12) and FESEM images (Fig. S13) revealing small, submicrometer, hexagonal crystals.

Comparison with 7BMI and 9BMI

As stated above, 8BMI is formally a dimer of the original OSDA for IM-20.4 We have explored the use of two similar OSDAs with the imidazolium moieties separated by slightly shorter and longer linkers, i.e. with 7 and 9 methylene linkers (7BMI and 9BMI, respectively, in Table S2, see Scheme 1) to check the importance of the linker's length. Although the structure direction of both was rather similar to that of 8BMI, the latter had a stronger effect towards HPM-9, exemplified by the fact that we were able to get pure HPM-9 with 8BMI at Gef = 0.1, while 7BMI and 9BMI produced mixtures with EMM-17. Moreover, at certain conditions producing pure HPM-9 with 8BMI (Gef = 0.5, water/T = 10), both the shorter and longer OSDAs produced a phase with a very low crystallinity (ICb) with traces of ITT. At a lower Gef (0.025) both 7BMI and 9BMI afforded EMM-17 (with trace impurities). The morphology for the 7BMI product at 7d was the noted rice of cards, while for 9BMI was an undeveloped rice of cards at 7d that finally evolved to the rice of cards at 12 days without an increase in the overall size of the particles. The particle size of the zeolite obtained with 7BMI was smaller than that of the zeolite prepared with 8BMI and much smaller than those prepared with 9BMI (Fig. 11).
image file: d5dt01413a-f11.tif
Fig. 11 FESEM images of EMM-17 obtained at Gef = 0.025 and water/T = 10 with 7BMI (a) and 8BMI (b) at 7d and with 9BMI at 7d (c) and 12d (d).

Conclusions

A bisimidazolium dication, which is formally a dimer of the OSDA reported in the discovery of IM-20, affords the synthesis of HPM-9, a UWY type of zeolite with a significantly decreased Ge content. This endows the zeolite with a much higher stability upon calcination and exposure to water than the original UWY had. The improved stability may open the way to applications of this mixed large pore/medium pore (12R/10R) zeolite. OSDAs with slightly shorter or longer size have a poorer structure direction towards HPM-9. At least for the HPM-9 zeolite with low Ge content some disorder is observed, which can be conclusively attributed to the presence of stacking faults along the a axis. Even if the disorder can be considered minimal (around 95% is UWY), the faults are related to the conversion of some d4r into s4r, which can in turn be attributed to the decreased amount of Ge available to stabilize d4r.

At even lower Ge contents another mixed pore system (11R/10R) with the structure of EMM-17 was obtained. This is in spite of the lack of d4r in the predominant A and B polymorphs reported for this zeolite. 19F MAS NMR reveals d4r do exist in our synthesized EMM-17 and we propose fluoride and, marginally, the small amount of Ge favors the formation of polymorph C, which contains d4r, and then polymorphs A and B grow by epitaxial intergrowth over polymorph C.

Author contributions

ZRG and MAC supervised the project, HY, PL and ZRG performed synthesis and characterization, AB and MAC worked on the DIFFaX simulations. MAC wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

Data for this article, including PXRD, SPXRD, DIFFaX simulated PXRD and multinuclear MAS NMR are available at DIGITAL.CSIC at https://hdl.handle.net/10261/390152.

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2022-137889OB-I00, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) is gratefully acknowledged. Synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data experiments were performed at the MSPD (Materials Science Powder Diffraction) beamline bl04 at the ALBA Spanish Synchrotron with the collaboration of the ALBA staff, and we gratefully thank Dr Alexander Missyul. H. Y. and P. L. are grateful to the China Scholarship Council for a PhD grant and a joint PhD research, respectively. P. L. acknowledges the support by Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory of International Cooperation Project (QNESL ICP 202305).

References

  1. H. Yu, L. A. Villaescusa, Z. R. Gao and M. A. Camblor, Stable Silica–Based Zeolites with Three–Dimensional Systems of Extra–Large Pores, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202412170 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. R. F. Lobo and M. E. Davis, CIT-1: A New Molecular Sieve with Intersecting Pores Bounded by 10- and 12-Rings, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 117, 3766–3779 CrossRef.
  3. C. Baerlocher and L. B. McCusker, Database of Zeolite Structures, https://www.iza-structure.org/databases/, (accessed May 12th, 2025).
  4. M. Dodin, J.-L. Paillaud, Y. Lorgouilloux, P. Caullet, E. Elkaïm and N. Bats, A Zeolitic Material with a Three-Dimensional Pore System Formed by Straight 12- and 10-Ring Channels Synthesized with an Imidazolium Derivative as Structure-Directing Agent, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 10221–10223 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. J. Toda and G. Sastre, Diffusion of Trimethylbenzenes, Toluene, and Xylenes in UWY Zeolite as a Catalyst for Transalkylation of Trimethylbenzenes with Toluene, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 7885–7897 CrossRef CAS.
  6. J. Wang, X. Ren, Q. Xiang, J. Jiang, F. Wang, Y. Guan, H. Xu and P. Wu, Double Unit-Cell Silicogermanate Nanosheets Developed by Salting-Out Mechanism for Biomass Conversion, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 18418–18426 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. C. M. Zicovich-Wilson, M. L. San-Román, M. A. Camblor, F. Pascale and J. S. Durand-Niconoff, Structure, Vibrational Analysis, and Insights into Host−Guest Interactions in As-Synthesized Pure Silica ITQ-12 Zeolite by Periodic B3LYP Calculations, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 11512–11523 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. A. Rojas, E. Martínez-Morales, C. M. Zicovich-Wilson and M. A. Camblor, Zeolite Synthesis in Fluoride Media: Structure Direction toward ITW by Small Methylimidazolium Cations, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 2255–2263 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. T. Blasco, A. Corma, M. J. Díaz-Cabañas, F. Rey, J. A. Vidal-Moya and C. M. Zicovich-Wilson, Preferential Location of Ge in the Double Four-Membered Ring Units of ITQ-7 Zeolite, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 2634–2642 CrossRef CAS.
  10. S. C. Weston, B. K. Peterson, J. E. Gatt, W. W. Lonergan, H. B. Vroman, M. Afeworki, G. J. Kennedy, D. L. Dorset, M. D. Shannon and K. G. Strohmaier, EMM-17, a New Three-Dimensional Zeolite with Unique 11-Ring Channels and Superior Catalytic Isomerization Performance, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 15910–15920 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. B. H. Toby and R. B. Dreele, GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2013, 46, 544–549 CrossRef CAS.
  12. S. Valencia, PhD Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 1997.
  13. J.-L. Paillaud, Y. Lorgouilloux, B. Harbuzaru, P. Caullet, J. Patarin and N. Bats, presented in part at the From Zeolites to Porous MOF Materials – The 40th Anniversary of International Zeolite Conference, 2007.
  14. R. T. Rigo, S. R. G. Balestra, S. Hamad, R. Bueno-Perez, A. R. Ruiz-Salvador, S. Calero and M. A. Camblor, The Si–Ge substitutional series in the chiral STW zeolite structure type, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 15110–15122 RSC.
  15. Y. Wang, J. Song and H. Gies, The substitution of germanium for silicon in AST-type zeolite, Solid State Sci., 2003, 5, 1421–1433 CrossRef CAS.
  16. I. Saha, A. Erlebach, P. Nachtigall, C. J. Heard and L. Grajciar, Germanium Distributions in Zeolites Derived from Neural Network Potentials, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2024, 14(20), 5838–5853 RSC.
  17. H. Koller, A. Wölker, L. A. Villaescusa, M. J. Díaz-Cabañas, S. Valencia and M. A. Camblor, Five-Coordinate Silicon in High-Silica Zeolites, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3368–3376 CrossRef CAS.
  18. B. H. Toby, R factors in Rietveld analysis: How good is good enough?, Powder Diffr., 2006, 21, 67–70 CrossRef CAS.
  19. M. M. J. Treacy, J. M. Newsam and M. W. Deem, A general recursion method for calculating diffracted intensities from crystals containing planar faults, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1991, 433, 499–520 CrossRef.
  20. M. Peng, Q. Deng, Y. Zhao, H. Xu, Y. Guan, J. Jiang, L. Han and P. Wu, ECNU–13: A High–Silica Zeolite with Three–Dimensional and High–Connectivity Multi–Pore Structures for Selective Alkene Cracking, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202217004 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. R. Bialek, Kriber 1.2, 2010 Search PubMed.
  22. K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2011, 44, 1272–1276 CrossRef CAS.
  23. M. A. Camblor, M.-J. Díaz-Cabañas, J. Perez-Pariente, S. J. Teat, W. Clegg, I. J. Shannon, P. Lightfoot, P. A. Wright and R. E. Morris, SSZ–23: An Odd Zeolite with Pore Openings of Seven and Nine Tetrahedral Atoms, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2122–2126 CrossRef CAS.
  24. X. Liu, L. Liu, T. Pan, N. Yan, X. Dong, Y. Li, L. Chen, P. Tian, Y. Han, P. Guo and Z. Liu, The Complex Crystal Structure and Abundant Local Defects of Zeolite EMM–17 Unraveled by Combined Electron Crystallography and Microscopy, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 24227–24233 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. S. Nair, M. Tsapatsis, L. A. Villaescusa and M. A. Camblor, Zeolite-β grown epitaxially on SSZ-31 nanofibers, Chem. Commun., 1999, 921–922 RSC.
  26. M. A. Camblor, P. A. Barrett, M. A.-J. Díaz-Cabañas, L. A. Villaescusa, M. Puche, T. Boix, E. Pérez and H. Koller, High silica zeolites with three-dimensional systems of large pore channels, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2001, 48, 11–22 CrossRef CAS.
  27. P. Lu, L. Gómez-Hortigüela and M. A. Camblor, Synthesis of pure silica MFI zeolites using imidazolium-based long dications. A comparative study of structure-directing effects derived from a further spacer length increase, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 7498–7504 RSC.
  28. Synthesis of nanocrystalline zeolite beta in the absence of alkali metal cations, in Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal, ed. M. A. Camblor, A. Corma, A. Mifsud, J. Pérez-Pariente and S. Valencia, 1997 Search PubMed.
  29. A. Corma, M. J. Díaz-Cabañas, J. L. Jordá, C. Martínez and M. Moliner, High-throughput synthesis and catalytic properties of a molecular sieve with 18- and 10-member rings, Nature, 2006, 443, 842–845 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5dt01413a
Present address: The ZeoMat Group, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.
§ Present address: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. E-mail: zgao44@jhu.edu

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.