Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Bayesian optimization with constraint on passed charge for multiparameter screening of electrochemical reductive carboxylation in a flow microreactor

Yuki Naito a, Masaru Kondo bc, Yuto Nakamura a, Naoki Shida a, Kazunori Ishikawa d, Takashi Washio *de, Shinobu Takizawa *ce and Mahito Atobe *a
aGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 240-8501, Japan. E-mail: atobe@ynu.ac.jp
bDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ibaraki University, Hitachi 316-8511, Ibaraki, Japan
cDepartment of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, SANKEN, Osaka University, Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan. E-mail: taki@sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp
dDepartment of Reasoning for Intelligence, SANKEN, Osaka University, Japan. E-mail: washio@ar.sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp
eArtificial Intelligence Research Center, SANKEN, Osaka University, Japan

Received 25th July 2025 , Accepted 25th July 2025

First published on 6th August 2025


Abstract

Correction for ‘Bayesian optimization with constraint on passed charge for multiparameter screening of electrochemical reductive carboxylation in a flow microreactor’ by Yuki Naito et al., Chem. Commun., 2022, 58, 3893–3896, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC00124A.


The authors regret that some of the current efficiencies reported in Table 1 were miscalculated in the original article. These errors do not affect the results or conclusions of the article. The corrected Table 1 is as shown below.
Table 1 Bayesian optimization (BO)-assisted multiparameter screening for the electrochemical carboxylation of 1a.a Training dataset (entries 1–5), BO with the constraints 2.0 < q < 3.0 (entries 6A–9A) and 2.0 < q < 2.1 (entries 6B–9B) are listed along with the corresponding experimental results (yields and current efficiencies). The complete dataset is shown in Table S2 in the ESI
Entry [1a]/M [Bu4NClO4]/M Current density/mA cm−2 Flow rate/mL h−1 Electrode distance/μm Charge passed (q)/F mol−1 Yield of 2ab/% Current efficiency/%
a Reaction conditions: cathode, glassy carbon plate; anode, Pt plate; solvent, THF; concentration of CO2, saturation concentration at 1 atm (∼0.4 M, see ESI for details). b Determined by HPLC.
1 0.08 0.1 25 15 120 2.33 28 24
2 0.08 0.15 40 25 80 2.24 31 28
3 0.04 0.1 10 10 20 2.80 88 63
4 0.04 0.05 25 25 120 2.80 39 28
5 0.12 0.15 15 5 80 2.80 46 33
6A 0.049 0.1 11.1 8.9 30 2.85 90 63
7A 0.062 0.075 12.2 7.4 20 2.98 78 52
8A 0.045 0.12 10.1 9.2 30 2.73 78 57
9A 0.043 0.077 11.9 11.1 30 2.79 81 58
6B 0.04 0.084 10.6 14.6 30 2.03 85 84
7B 0.071 0.053 10.6 8.3 40 2.01 71 71
8B 0.06 0.15 11.7 10.8 20 2.02 77 76
9B 0.042 0.094 12.2 16 20 2.03 88 87


The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.