Open Access Article
Youmei
Xu‡
a,
Yuchao
Chen‡
a,
Mengxia
Wang
ab,
Yufei
Shu
a,
Siyu
Cao
a and
Zhongying
Wang
*ac
aSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China. E-mail: wangzy6@sustech.edu.cn
bSchool of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
cGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
First published on 9th April 2024
Nitrophenol wastewater treatment and extracting and reusing precious metals from electronic wastewater have recently gained considerable attention. In this study, polyaniline-based membranes showcased remarkable gold recovery capability from electronic wastewater, effectively reclaiming 100% of gold on the membrane surface even in the presence of competing metal cations. The prepared Au@PmPD membrane, characterized by its high specific surface area and abundant Au nanoparticles (NPs), demonstrated excellent catalytic activity and stability, maintaining near 100% conversion efficiency in reducing 4-NP to 4-AP in the presence of NaBH4 over extended durations. Compared with the conventional physical mixing method, our in situ formation of the Au@PmPD membrane highlights the superior distribution of Au NPs and active sites for enhanced catalytic efficiency. It eliminates the need for additional steps to load Au NPs onto the membrane, resulting in a more straightforward and efficient process. Overall, this research provides a sustainable approach to repurposing waste into precious resources and offers a promising solution for the efficient treatment of persistent organic pollutants in wastewater, aligning with the principles of a circular economy.
Environmental significanceThis study highlights the environmental significance of utilizing Au@PmPD membranes for the dual purpose of recovering valuable gold from electronic waste and catalytically reducing hazardous 4-nitrophenol in wastewater. By achieving 100% gold recovery and demonstrating robust catalytic performance in degrading persistent organic pollutants, the membrane technology presents a sustainable approach to waste management. It not only mitigates the environmental impact of e-waste and industrial wastewater but also contributes to resource recovery and pollution reduction, aligning with the goals of a circular economy and cleaner production. |
Various methods are available for removing nitrophenols from contaminated water sources. Commonly employed approaches include advanced oxidation processes (AOPs),8 the adsorption method,8,9 and electrochemical treatment.10 Among these, catalysis emerges as a preferred choice owing to its efficiency and environmentally friendly characteristics.11,12 It eliminates the necessity for harsh chemicals and high energy consumption, making it a more sustainable and practical option. However, nanoparticle catalysts tend to aggregate, necessitating support structures to enhance their specific surface area and active sites. Recent advancements have spotlighted catalysis facilitated by membranes, drawing attention to its straightforward application and the potent synergistic benefits it accrues from combining membrane processes with catalytic action.13,14 Moreover, the catalytic membrane not only retains the advantages of traditional catalysis, but also allows for easy regeneration and reuse, thereby further enhancing its practicality. In membrane catalysis for nitrophenols, sodium borohydride (NaBH4) is commonly employed as a reducing agent. As wastewater containing nitrophenols passes through the membrane, nitrophenol molecules and NaBH4 interact with the catalyst impregnated within the membrane, prompting the reduction of the nitro group (–NO2) to an amino group (–NH2). For example, Yu et al. developed a porous wood membrane decorated with gold nanoparticles (Au NPs), capable of continuously converting over 98% of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-aminophenol (4-AP) at a reaction constant of 0.152 min−1 with NaBH4.15 Similarly, Fang et al. prepared an ultrafiltration membrane loaded with Ag NPs within its inner pores to separate and catalyze the degradation of pollutants, achieving a 98.0% conversion of 4-NP with NaBH4 even in the presence of humic acid.16
Presently, the application of membrane catalysis for nitrophenol removal faces several limitations. The catalyst predominantly consists of expensive precious metal nanoparticles,17,18 such as gold (Au), and the cost associated with integrating Au NPs into the membrane can be prohibitive. This high expense may impede the scalability of the method and limit its practicality for large-scale treatment applications. Additionally, conventional membrane substrates, such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)19 and carbon nanotubes (CNTs),20 lack specific interactions with Au, leading to a limited loading capacity of Au NPs within the membrane. Such a low loading capacity typically implies a scarcity of catalytic sites, thereby diminishing the overall effectiveness of the nitrophenol removal process. Furthermore, the weak interaction between Au and membrane substrates may pose the risk of Au NP leaching into the treated water, potentially causing secondary environmental contamination, as well as a decline in the catalytic activity of the membrane over time.
Electronic waste (e-waste) is rich in precious metals such as Au and can be a potential source for Au-laden catalytic membranes.21,22 It has emerged as the fastest-growing component of urban solid waste, with annual global production ranging from 20 to 50 million tons,23 prompting widespread societal concern. The significant economic and environmental value associated with the Au content found in e-waste, which is often several times greater than that found in native gold ore,24,25 underscores the importance of developing comprehensive technologies for the efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly recovery of Au from e-waste. However, the complexity of e-waste coupled with the relatively low concentration of Au compared to other metals poses challenges to the effective recovery of pure Au.26 Currently proposed hydrometallurgical approaches for Au recovery from e-waste primarily involve three steps: pretreatment, Au leaching, and subsequent separation and recovery.27 The most widely used leaching methods in industry involve strongly corrosive and toxic aqua regia and cyanidation, which produce a large amount of electronic wastewater and pose serious environmental risks.28,29 Additionally, these processes entail additional steps for desorption and separation of the Au complex with a leaching agent, thereby increasing investment costs. In this context, e-waste represents both a significant challenge and a valuable opportunity as a potential source for Au-laden catalytic membranes, which could address the critical need for pollutant degradation and resource recovery.
To address these dual challenges, we propose an innovative strategy that involves the engineering of a specialized membrane with an enhanced affinity for Au, intending to utilize it for anchoring Au from electronic wastewater, particularly e-waste leaching solutions known to contain substantial concentrations of precious metals. By selectively extracting Au from these solutions and affixing it onto the membranes as a catalyst, we aim to reduce the overall costs while also contributing to resource recycling efforts. To achieve this, the membrane surface will incorporate chemical binding sites such as amines, amides, and other relevant groups that are known for their strong affinity for Au.30–32 Furthermore, this particular membrane is expected to possess essential properties, including corrosion resistance, structural durability, and chemical stability, which are crucial for maintaining prolonged and effective catalytic performance.33 To the best of our knowledge, a functionalized membrane capable of extracting Au from electronic wastewater while possessing high catalytic performance for nitrophenol conversion is currently absent from the existing research landscape.
In this study, poly(m-phenylenediamine) (PmPD) membranes were employed to extract Au and serve as catalytic membranes for nitrophenol conversion. The selection of the PmPD membrane was based on its surface rich in amino groups, enhancing the affinity for Au, and its inherent chemical stability. The PmPD membrane was prepared through an oxidative polymerization method, and Au NPs were immobilized onto the membrane surface by in situ sorption to decrease their agglomeration effect. For the nitrophenol conversion experiment, 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) was selected as a model contaminant. The catalytic activity of the Au@PmPD membrane for 4-NP reduction was evaluated through membrane catalysis experiments. Various parameters, such as PmPD and Au loadings, the addition of the reducing agent, pH, and co-existing anions, were systematically investigated to assess their influence on the 4-NP reduction efficiency. Additionally, the stability and reusability of the Au@PmPD membrane were evaluated to ascertain its long-term viability in nitrophenol reduction applications. This research aims to develop a novel functionalized Au@PmPD membrane by in situ recovery of gold from electronic wastewater and utilizing it for nitrophenol removal through catalytic reduction. This approach presents a potential strategy for repurposing precious metals from e-waste, thereby contributing to a circular economy.
Au loading onto the PmPD membrane was conducted in a Millipore cell (UFSC40001, MilliporeSigma, U.S.A.) with a 4.0 cm diameter and a surface area of 12.56 cm2. To simulate the Au species obtained from aqua regia etching solution, a HAuCl4 solution was used as the source of Au-containing wastewater. For the capture and loading of Au, the PmPD membrane, containing 15 mg of PmPD nanoparticles at pH ∼5.0, was filtered with 100 mL of HAuCl4 solution containing 40 mg L−1 Au, under a 0.2 bar pressure as the driving force for 30 min. Throughout this process, the concentration of residual Au in the filtrate was monitored by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; iCAP 7000 Series, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, U.S.A.). Notably, no Au ions were detected in the filtrate, indicating the successful immobilization of nearly all Au ions (amounting to 4.0 mg) into the PmPD adsorptive membrane. The resulting Au-laden PmPD membrane, referred to as Au@PmPD, was subsequently employed for the catalytic reduction of 4-NP.
N–) and benzenoid amine (–C–N–) structures, respectively. In Raman spectra, the peak observed at ∼1573 cm−1 was attributed to the presence of quinoid structures, while the two peaks observed at ∼1330 and ∼1410 cm−1 were associated with the phenazine structure (Fig. 2d). The resulting PmPD nanoparticles were further processed into membranes through cross-linking and vacuum filtration onto a nylon membrane substrate. The surface morphology of both the nylon membrane and PmPD membrane was examined by SEM (Fig. 2e and f). The nylon membrane displayed a porous surface with an average pore size of ∼200 nm, while the PmPD membrane consisted of a dense layer of PmPD nanoparticles on top of the nylon substrate, significantly decreasing the apparent pore size of the membrane.
Following the loading of Au, both the structure and chemical composition of the Au@PmPD membrane were thoroughly characterized. SEM (Fig. S4a and b†) and TEM imaging (Fig. 3a) unveil the presence of distinct nanoparticles attached to PmPD particles. To examine the elemental distribution within Au@PmPD, EDS mapping was performed, revealing the uniform dispersion of the newly formed nanoparticles enriched with Au (Fig. 3b and c), along with other elements such as C and N (Fig. S4c and d†) across the entire PmPD surface. The average particle size of Au NPs was found to be ∼40 nm (as inserted in Fig. 3c). Further insight into the chemical composition of the Au@PmPD membrane was obtained through XRD and XPS measurements. The XRD pattern of the Au@PmPD membrane showcases the peaks observed at 38.28°, 44.5°, 67.74°, and 77.76° (Fig. 3d), corresponding to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) crystal planes of metallic Au, respectively. This observation demonstrates the formation of Au nanoparticles within the PmPD membrane during the Au capture process. The Au 4f XPS spectra (Fig. 3e) revealed peaks at 84.2 and 88.0 eV, assigned to Au 4f7/2 and Au 4f5/2 of Au(0), respectively, as well as peaks at 85.7 and 89.4 eV attributed to Au 4f7/2 and Au 4f5/2 of Au(I), respectively. These findings confirm the presence of both Au(0) and intermediate Au(I) states, signifying the reduction of Au(III) on the surface of PmPD.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 Characterization of the Au@PmPD membrane: (a) TEM image, (b and c) TEM and EDS spectra showing the Au elemental mapping, (d) XRD pattern, and (e) high-resolution XPS spectra of Au 4f. | ||
To elucidate the role of PmPD in the adsorption and reduction of Au(III), XPS characterization was performed on the PmPD membrane before and after Au(III) capture (Fig. S5†). The N 1s XPS spectra of the PmPD membrane (Fig. S5b†) display peaks at 397.9, 398.9, 399.7, and 400.4 eV associated with –NH– in the benzenoid amine units, –N
C– in both quinoid imine and phenazine, –N–C–, and –N+
, respectively. A comparative analysis of the N 1s spectra before and after Au recovery indicates a noticeable shift towards higher binding energy following Au adsorption. Specifically, deconvolution analysis showed a decrease in the content of –NH– and –N
C– groups and an increase in the –N–C– group, confirming the interaction between gold and the functional groups (e.g., –NH–) in the PmPD membrane, corroborating the reduction of gold by these amino moieties.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 UV-vis absorbance changes of 4-NP with NaBH4 under different conditions: before and after 136 min and after the mixed solution passes through the PmPD and Au@PmPD membrane. | ||
To investigate the effects of PmPD and Au loadings on the catalytic reduction performance of 4-NP by the membranes, experiments were conducted with varying PmPD contents (5, 15, and 20 mg) and Au loadings (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg). As shown in Fig. S9,† different PmPD amounts in the membranes yielded similar outcomes, suggesting that 5 mg of PmPD was sufficient to capture and reduce 4.0 mg Au(III) to Au NPs and to serve as the catalytic membrane for converting 4-NP. Fig. 5a shows that 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg of Au NPs achieved nearly complete degradation of 4-NP, with higher loading of Au NPs correlating with an increased conversion rate from 4-NP to 4-AP. The concentration of NaBH4, as the reducing agent, plays an important role in determining the reduction rate during the reduction process. Fig. 5b demonstrates that when the concentration of NaBH4 reached 25 mM, the conversion efficiency of 4-NP reached nearly 100%.
To assess the impact of co-existing anions commonly found in industrial wastewater on the catalytic reduction of 4-NP using the Au@PmPD membrane, experiments were conducted with a mixture containing 20 mg L−1 4-NP and the same mass concentration of NO3−, SO42−, and PO43−. The concentrations of these co-existing anions were monitored in the filtrate. The results demonstrated that the Au@PmPD membrane exhibited approximately 40% removal of PO43−, while showing a minimal impact on the removal of NO3− and SO42− (Fig. 5c). The slight removal of PO43− was likely caused by the electrostatic attraction between positively charged PmPD and the PO43− anion. However, the adsorption of PO43− did not compromise the catalytic conversion efficiency of 4-NP by the Au@PmPD membrane. The conversion efficiency of 4-NP by the Au@PmPD membrane remained nearly 100% throughout an 18-min duration, irrespective of the presence of co-existing anions. These results suggest that the presence of the anions had no significant effect on the conversion of 4-NP. The impact of initial pH on catalytic performance was investigated across a wide pH range from 3 to 11. Notably, it was found that pH had a minimal effect on the catalytic reduction, and the conversion efficiency of 4-NP maintained ∼100% under all tested pH conditions (Fig. 5d). These results collectively underscore the Au@PmPD membrane's robustness and its potential applicability in effectively treating 4-NP in diverse wastewater environments.
To evaluate the long-term catalytic stability of the Au@PmPD membrane, an extended experiment spanning 136 minutes was conducted. Notably, the absorbance of 4-NP almost disappeared, and the catalytic reduction conversion efficiency remained remarkably stable, maintaining a near 100% conversion without any evidence of Au leaching throughout the entire duration (Fig. 6a and b). Several characterization studies were performed to further assess the changes in the morphology and compositions of the Au@PmPD membrane after the 136-min reaction. SEM-EDS (Fig. 6c and S10†) showed that the morphology of the used Au@PmPD membrane remained largely unchanged, with Au NPs consistently present on the surface of the membrane without apparent loss. Moreover, XRD (Fig. 6d), FT-IR (Fig. 6e), and XPS (Fig. 6f) reveal no significant shifts in peak positions or the emergence of new peaks. These results collectively affirm the Au@PmPD membrane's enduring catalytic capability in converting 4-NP to 4-AP and its substantial chemical stability over extended experimental duration, highlighting its robustness and suitability for long-term applications in catalytic processes.
The influence of residence time on the catalytic conversion of 4-NP by the Au@PmPD membrane was investigated by modulating the flow rate through the control of the external pressure, as shown in Fig. 7a. During the catalytic reduction process of 4-NP by the Au@PmPD membrane, a higher applied pressure proportionally resulted in higher water flux, consequently shortening the contact time between 4-NP and the Au NPs within the catalytic membrane (Fig. S11†). This resulted in a discernible decrease in the catalytic conversion efficiency of 4-NP as the external pressure escalated from 0.2 to 2.6 bar, with efficiency diminishing from nearly 100% to about 82% once the pressure exceeded 2.0 bar.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 7 The reaction kinetics of 4-NP reduction catalyzed by the Au@PmPD membrane: (a) 4-NP conversion under external pressure ranging from 0.2 to 2.6 bar, and (b) plot of −ln(C0/Ct) versus reaction time for the catalytic reduction of 4-NP. (c) Comparison of the rate constants in the catalytic degradation of 4-NP by the Au@PmPD membrane with those by the membranes reported in the published literature.19,36–43 | ||
Under each pressure, the residence time (Rt) of 4-NP within the membrane was calculated using
, where Veff is the effective pore volume of the Au@PmPD membrane and ν is the flow rate of the solution. Detailed methodologies for measuring Veff and calculating the flow rate at various applied pressures are described in Text S1 and depicted in Fig. S11.† The conversion of 4-NP was fitted using the first-order kinetics, and the reaction rate constant of 4-NP for the Au@PmPD membrane (kobs) was determined to be 2.206 s−1 (Fig. 7b).
Fig. 7c presents a comparison of reductive conversion of 4-NP by the Au@PmPD membrane and other reported catalytic membranes focusing on the quantity of NaBH4 added and the conversion rate constants. Remarkably, the Au@PmPD membrane showcased a significant efficiency in 4-NP reduction, requiring only 178.6 M of NaBH4 to reduce 1 M of 4-NP. This was markedly lower than the amounts required in similar studies, such as the Cu-Ag-Au NPs@β-LGF membrane which necessitated 1034.5 M of NaBH4.38 Moreover, compared to other studies that employed fewer amounts of NaBH4, like the Ag/TiO2/PVDF@TiO2 membrane,19 the Au@PmPD membrane not only achieved near 100% reductive conversion of 4-NP, but also exhibited a significantly higher reaction rate constant of 2.206 s−1. Therefore, these results highlight the pivotal significance of the Au@PmPD membrane as an efficient catalytic membrane for the reductive conversion of 4-NP. The mechanism underlying the high catalytic activity is investigated below.
To evaluate the efficacy of our in situ extraction and formation method versus the direct mixing method for Au incorporation, we prepared two types of gold-containing PmPD membranes using each method and assessed their conversion efficiency for 4-NP. Fig. 8a and b depict the schematic illustrations of the in situ extraction and formation method, as well as the direct physical mixing method. In the direct-mixing method, Au NPs with an average particle size of 32 nm (Fig. S12†), akin to those in Au@PmPD, were prepared by reducing 100 mL HAuCl4 solution (10−2 wt%) with 1.0 mL sodium citrate (1 wt%).44 Following thorough mixing of PmPD and Au NPs, the resultant mixture was vacuum-filtered on the nylon membrane substrate, ensuring the same PmPD and Au mass loadings in the membrane as in the typical Au@PmPD membrane. The comparative results, as shown in Fig. 8c and d, demonstrate a nearly complete conversion of 4-NP by our in situ formation membrane, whereas the directly mixed membrane exhibited only a 55.2% removal efficiency. This stark contrast highlights the superior performance and efficiency of the in situ extraction and formation method in catalyzing 4-NP conversion.
The notable difference in catalytic efficiency is largely due to the distinct distribution of Au NPs within the membrane matrix and, consequently, affecting the exposed surface area of catalytic Au NPs. Due to the agglomeration effect of Au NPs, the direct-mixing method leads to uneven dispersion of Au NPs throughout the PmPD membrane matrix. Moreover, owing to the embedding effect,45 the exposed surface of Au NPs may be partially covered by the PmPD matrix, limiting the availability of active sites for catalytic reactions. In contrast, membranes created via in situ Au extraction and formation present several benefits. In this in situ method, Au(III) was reduced to Au NPs by PmPD, thus anchoring them to the PmPD membrane surface. This ensures a more uniform distribution on the surface of the PmPD membrane matrix, alleviating the embedding and agglomeration effects, thereby providing more catalytic sites on the membrane surface compared to its physically mixed counterparts, which contributes to enhanced catalytic activity. Moreover, the chemical bonds between Au NPs and the PmPD membrane lead to a stronger binding force, potentially increasing the stability and durability of the catalytic membrane during its application.
After utilizing a 15 mg PmPD membrane to extract Au from 10 mL of electronic wastewater, the outcomes (Fig. 9a) revealed that the PmPD membrane attained a 100% recovery rate of Au, effectively outperforming numerous other competing metal cations. The mechanism underlying this efficient recovery can be attributed to the affinity of the PmPD membrane's amino groups for Au. Specifically, Au exists as AuCl4− in the electronic wastewater and is electrostatically attracted to the positively charged PmPD membrane, facilitating selective adsorption of Au(III). Conversely, other cations are electrostatically repelled, which minimizes their interaction with the membrane. This underscores the PmPD membrane's superior proficiency in gold recovery from authentic electronic wastewater. Furthermore, as depicted in Fig. 9b, the reclaimed membrane showcased robust catalytic reduction performance, successfully eliminating 4-NP and MB with an excess of NaBH4 (0.1 M), where all samples post-1-minute treatment reached a 100% removal rate for both 4-NP and MB. Moreover, as the image inserted in Fig. 9b shows, the solution underwent a noticeable transition from a dark blue to complete colorlessness, indicating successful decolorization. This was attributed to the catalytic reduction, converting MB into its colorless form, leuco-methylene blue, and 4-NP into 4-AP. Subsequent XRD patterns of the PmPD membranes, before and after the catalytic reaction, highlighted that among these metals detected, only characteristic peaks for Au were exhibited, and no significant changes were observed in the spectra, evidencing the PmPD membranes' exceptional selectivity for Au and their stability. Thus, the PmPD membrane not only excels in retrieving Au(III) from electronic wastewater but also serves as an efficient catalytic medium for 4-NP wastewater treatment, effectively converting waste into a valuable asset and mitigating environmental pollutants through waste conversion.
Footnotes |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Concentration–absorbance standard curve of 4-NP (Fig. S1); XRD pattern of PmPD nanoparticles (Fig. S2); plot of zeta potential versus pH for cross-linked PmPD (Fig. S3); C, N elemental mapping spectra of the Au@PmPD membrane (Fig. S4); high-resolution N 1s XPS spectra of the PmPD membrane before and after Au(III) recovery (Fig. S5); N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of Au@PmPD (Fig. S6); UV-vis absorbance changes of 4-NP before and after passing through the Au@PmPD membrane (Fig. S7); color change of 4-NP solution before and after the catalytic reduction reaction through the Au@PmPD membrane (Fig. S8); the effect of PmPD loading on the catalytic performance of the Au@PmPD membrane (Fig. S9); SEM-EDS mapping spectra of the Au@PmPD membrane after a 136-min reaction (Fig. S10); plot of flux and residence time versus pressure for the Au@PmPD membrane (Fig. S11); size distribution of Au NP dispersion (Fig. S12); the measurement of effective pore volume (Text S1); comparison of catalytic reduction of 4-NP by the Au@PmPD membrane with that by the membranes reported in the published literature (Table S1); characteristics of simulated electronic wastewater (Table S2); quality characteristics of simulated dyeing wastewater (Table S3). See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4va00010b |
| ‡ The authors contributed equally to the work. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |