Open Access Article
Wenxiao
Gong
a,
Yulan
Li
*a,
Yang
Yang
a,
Heng
Guo
*b and
Xiaobin
Niu
*a
aSchool of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, P. R. China. E-mail: liyl03@uestc.edu.cn; xbniu@uestc.edu.cn
bSchool of New Energy and Materials, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, 610050, China. E-mail: heng.guo@swpu.edu.cn
First published on 24th September 2024
Correction for ‘Enhanced charge transport from Pd-doping in CsPbBr3 quantum dots for efficient photoelectrocatalytic water splitting’ by Wenxiao Gong et al., J. Mater. Chem. C, 2023, 11, 6963–6970, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TC00115F.
In the Results and discussion section, second paragraph, the text: “The cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and EDS mapping images are also provided in Fig. S2 (ESI†). We can see that the image of Pd is not clear because of the low Pd doping content, and as shown in Table S1 (ESI†) the concentration of Pd is 0.2%. According to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), measurements, the doping percentage of Pd in Pd-CsPbBr3 QDs is around 0.2% (Table S2, ESI†)” should be replaced with “The cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and EDS mapping images are also provided in Fig. S2 and Table S1 (ESI†). We can see that the Pd uniformly distributed in the Pd-CsPbBr3 QDs. According to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), measurements, the doping percentage of Pd in Pd-CsPbBr3 QDs is around 0.09% (Table S2, ESI†).”
These changes have been checked by an independent expert who confirms that the revised data do not impact the conclusions of the published article.
Table S2 of the Supplementary Information for the published article has also been updated.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |