Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

The preparation route and final form of V-MXenes override the effect of the O/F ratio on their magnetic properties

Pavla Eliášová *a, Břetislav Šmíd b, Jana Vejpravová b, Shuo Li a, Federico Brivio a, Michal Mazur a, Daniel N. Rainer a, M. Infas H. Mohideen a, Russell E. Morris c and Petr Nachtigall a
aFaculty of Sciences, Charles University, Hlavova 8, Prague 2 128 43, Czech Republic. E-mail: pavla.eliasova@natur.cuni.cz
bFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 5, Prague 2 121 16, Czech Republic
cEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9ST, UK

Received 10th January 2024 , Accepted 13th March 2024

First published on 13th March 2024


Abstract

Transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) show a high potential for electrochemical energy storage in batteries and supercapacitors and for electrocatalysis. Their excellent electronic and magnetic characteristics have been highlighted in several theoretical studies. However, experimental research on MXenes is yet to confirm their predicted properties as candidates for controllable magnetic 2D materials. Here, we report our theoretical and experimental study of V2CTx MXenes (T = O, OH, F), providing key insights into their magnetism. Based on our density functional theory (DFT) analysis, we predicted ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) states of V2CTx, which are determined by the O/F ratio of surface functional groups. Accordingly, we prepared V2CTx MXenes in the form of multilayered powders and thin films with different O/F ratios. No experimental evidence of FM or AFM properties was found in any material. Nevertheless, powders and films with almost identical chemical compositions (in terms of O/F ratio) displayed different magnetic properties, whereas films with disparate chemical compositions revealed a similar magnetic character. Therefore, the preparation route and form of the final V2CTx material override the effect of the O/F ratio, which is often overestimated in theoretical studies. Moreover, these findings underscore the importance of preparing MXene materials to experimentally confirm their theoretically predicted properties.


Introduction

Isolated graphene layers have opened up many opportunities for new discoveries.1 As a result, considerable research efforts have focused on two-dimensional (2D) materials. Thanks to their distinctive properties, 2D materials such as transition metal oxides,2 hexagonal boron nitrides,3 transition metal dichalcogenides4 and clays5 can be used in a wide range of technological applications, including gas sensors, materials for energy storage, field-effect transistors (FETs) and photodetectors, and in medicine as drug delivery agents, respectively. In particular, the ability to prepare layered Ti3C2Tx6 has fostered numerous new 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes).7

MXenes display high electrical conductivity, redox active surface area and mechanical strength, in addition to rich surface chemistry. These properties endow MXenes with a high potential for many applications. As a case in point, these materials have been extensively studied for electrochemical energy storage applications, such as lithium-ion batteries,8 and electrochemical capacitors,9 and for photovoltaic applications.10 Furthermore, MXenes have been tested in electrocatalytic oxygen and hydrogen evolution and CO2 reduction,11 water desalination12 and, more recently, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding.13

MXenes have an Mn+1Xn general formula where M is a transition metal, and X stands for carbon or nitrogen. Only MXenes with M = Ti, V, Nb, Mo, Cr, Hf, Sc, Ta, W, or Y have been reported thus far, most of which prepared by wet-etching the aluminium layer of a parent MAX phase with a general formula of Mn+1AXn, where A represents elements of groups 13 and 14 of the periodic table, primarily aluminium. After aluminium removal, the surface of MXenes becomes covered by mixed terminations. MXenes are then designated by Mn+1XTx, where T can be O, OH, NH, F, Cl, Br, S, Se, or Te, depending on the etching14,15 and post-etching procedures.16–19 Typically, these etching procedures involve using (concentrated or in situ-formed) hydrofluoric acid and/or hydrochloric acid, which lead to O, OH, F and Cl terminal groups. In just over a decade, more than 30 stoichiometric MXenes have been synthesized, and more than a hundred MXenes (disregarding variable surface terminations) have been theoretically predicted.20,21 As one of the fastest growing class of 2D materials,7 MXenes have been the object of research of many theoretical studies, predicting excellent electronic and magnetic characteristics. For these properties, they stand out as ideal candidates for controllable magnetic 2D materials.21–26

Most pristine and functionalized MXene materials are non-magnetic due to strong covalent bonding between the transition metal and the X element and to surface functional groups, as shown by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.27 Conversely, MXenes based on Cr, V and/or Mn should be magnetically active, according to theoretical predictions.21,23–25,28,29 But whether symmetrical or asymmetrical with respect to the upper and lower surfaces, surface functionalization of these materials (e.g., F, O or OH) likely changes their magnetic properties. For example, Mn2CF2 is an intrinsic half-metal with a high Curie temperature (520 K), which can be used for spin injection in spintronics,24 and functionalized M2N (M = Mn, Cr and Ti) MXenes are half-metallic as well.30 So, half-metal materials, which are metallic in one spin channel and semiconductor or insulator in another, show ferromagnetism potentially applicable for spin injection.31

These theoretical results motivate experimentalists to develop new synthesis routes for 2D high-temperature spin-polarized materials with ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism for potential spintronic applications. However, such properties are yet to be experimentally confirmed, and their applications in spintronics remain limited by the lack of intrinsic magnetism of MXenes. Making matters worse, experimental studies on the magnetic behavior of MXenes are few and far between. Nevertheless, magnetism has been experimentally identified in 2D MXenes such as Cr2TiC2Tx (but not in its parent 3D MAX phase),32 Mn3N2 (even at 300 K),33 and Ti3C2Tx (functionalized via treatment with hydrofluoric and chlorosulfonic acid).34 The last study has also shown that the magnetic properties of MXenes are affected by their surface terminal groups.34 In turn, the distribution of these terminal groups is affected by the etching conditions and post-synthetic treatments applied to prepare these materials.14–19 Therefore, we aimed at studying the relative contribution of these factors while experimentally testing the theoretically predicted electromagnetic properties of V2CTx28 as a model MXene.

Combining both experimental and theoretical approaches, we conducted a detailed study of the magnetic properties of V2CTx MXene. In our study, V2CTx materials were prepared by wet etching, applying different acid concentrations and post-synthetic treatment in oxygen flow to modify the terminal groups (the ratio between O and F groups; O/F ratio) and to assess their effect on MXene magnetism. These materials were obtained in the form of multilayered powders and ultrathin films and characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), in addition to magnetic measurements. The experimental data were compared with DFT simulations to gain insights into the magnetic behavior of V2CTx materials.

Results and discussion

Theoretical study

In this study, we explored the experimental feasibility of V2CTx. By DFT,35 we theoretically investigated V2CTx MXenes with different surface terminations to predict their magnetic properties (details of the methodology in ESI). For this purpose, we used the V2CT2 model consisting of V2COxF2−x periodic 2D layers. On the surface of these MXenes, we considered two different “hollow” sites, which result in three types of surface functionalizations (Fig. 1), namely surface-terminating groups located (i) above the “hollow” site formed by three neighboring C atoms (type I site) or (ii) above the C atoms (type II site) and (iii) a combination of the previous two, upper and lower surfaces (type III site), respectively. The type I site had the lowest energy of all surface-terminating modes under consideration and, thus, was used to study the geometric, electronic and magnetic properties of functionalized V2CT2 MXenes. Testing various F[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]O ratios (2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0, 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]3, and 0[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2; Fig. S1, ESI), we performed calculations with the (2 × 2 × 1) supercell (except for the 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2 ratio). The results are summarized in Table S1, in ESI.
image file: d4tc00132j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Three possible binding sites for surface functionalization on V2CT2 MXenes.

As calculated, the formation energies (Eform defined in eqn (S1), ESI) of functionalized V2CF2 and V2CO2 MXenes are relatively high (−4.13 and −4.89 eV, respectively) and represent the lower and upper bounds of mixed MXenes. In other words, the formation energies of all mixed V2COxF2−x MXenes are within these bounds (Table S1, ESI), indicating that strong chemical bonds are formed between V and surface functional groups. The stacking of individual layers is shown in Fig. S2 (ESI). The interlayer distances of various V2COxF2−x MXenes range from 0.218 to 0.246 nm in V2CF2 and V2CO2, respectively, corroborating previous findings (0.24 nm).36 Also in line with the experimental data and with previous reports,37 the calculated lattice parameters of V2COxF2−x MXenes (Table S1, ESI) range from 0.295 to 0.316 nm.

Electronic states, spin polarization and magnetic properties were assessed for all V2COxF2−x MXenes considered in this study (Fig. S1 and Table S1, ESI). As shown by the potential magnetic configurations (Fig. S3, ESI), the presence of O and F on the surface of MXenes leads to charge transfer towards the surface (Bader charge analysis).38 This charge transfer affects the position of the V-3d orbitals in both spin channels. Our calculations of the local magnetic moments of V2CO2 revealed that V atoms are in a high spin state with 1 unpaired d electron (e.g., d1↑ spin configurations), corresponding to a V4+ electronic configuration. Thus, V2CO2 MXene is a ferromagnetic (FM) half-metal and has a total magnetic moment of 2μB (per unit cell), which mainly derives from V atoms. In contrast, V2CF2 MXene is an antiferromagnetic (AFM) semiconductor, and its V atoms are in a high spin state with 2 unpaired d electrons (e.g., d2↑ spin configurations), formally corresponding to a V3+ electronic configuration. The calculated magnetic moments of V atoms increase with the concentration of surface F-functionalization, ranging from 1.12 (V2CO2) to 1.84μB (V2CF2, see Table S1, ESI).

Because the expected ratio between O and F functionalization is 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, the results from the V2CO1.5F0.5 MXene model (with a 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 O/F ratio) are particularly relevant to experimental findings. All O and F configurations on the V2CO1.5F0.5 MXene model (Fig. S1, ESI) are found in the FM ground state. Using V2CO1.5F0.5-C and V2CO1.5F0.5-E MXenes as prototypes (the letters from C to E denote specific configurations of O/F surface atoms, as defined in Fig. S1, ESI), we show their partial density of states (PDOS) in Fig. S4 (ESI). In addition, spin-polarized densities are shown in Fig. S5 (ESI) together with the variation of the heat capacity of V2CO1.5F0.5 MXenes as a function of temperature calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. The corresponding Curie temperature is 7 K. The results show that not only spin polarization increases with the oxygen concentration but also the Curie temperature (TC) increases with the asymmetry of surface functionalization in V2CO1.5F0.5 MXenes. Accordingly, the Curie temperature can be engineered via surface functionalization.

We further considered four configurations of V2CO1.33F0.67 MXenes modeled using a (3 × 3) supercell (Fig. S6, ESI) with a 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 O/F ratio. All V2CO1.33F0.67 MXenes are found in the ferromagnetic ground state and are half metals (Fig. S6, ESI). To gain insights into the intriguing electronic properties of V2CO2, V2CF2 and V2CO1.33F0.67 MXenes, PDOS of V-3d orbitals were plotted, as shown in Fig. S7a (ESI). Given the local symmetry on V atoms of V2CO2 and V2CF2 MXenes, the V-3d orbitals split into a non-degenerate a (dz2) orbital and two 2-fold degenerate e orbitals, namely (dyz + dxz) and (dx2y2 + dxy). Both the conduction band minimum (CBM) and the valence band maximum (VBM) depend on the V-3d orbitals. The spin polarization of V-3d orbitals of V2CO1.33F0.67 MXenes is stronger around the Fermi level than that of V2CO2 MXenes, but weaker in the deeper valence bands. Schematics of the spin polarization of V atoms in symmetrically and asymmetrically functionalized surfaces are shown in Fig. S7b (ESI). Due to the different chemical environments in functionalized V2CO1.33F0.67 MXenes, the non-degenerate V-3d orbitals result in the ferromagnetic spin state.

Varying the concentration of O and F on one of the surfaces provides an effective way to control the spin polarization of V atoms. Computational results indicate that the magnetic state of V2COxF2−x MXenes is primarily determined by (i) the relative concentration of O and F surface atoms; all considered configurations of surface functional groups give the ferromagnetic state if the O/F ratio is above 2. But the relative stability of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic states is also modulated by (ii) the degree of asymmetry in the functionalization of upper and lower surfaces. Therefore, these two factors determine the magnetism of V2COxF2−x MXenes.

Experimental section – preparation of V2CTx films

V2CTx MXene was first reported by Naguib et al. as a promising material for Li-ion batteries.39 Its synthesis was subsequently improved by optimizing the conditions and stabilizing the exfoliated layers in a solution.40 In the present study, we tested different etching conditions, combining hydrofluoric and hydrochloric acids in different concentrations at room temperature (≈24 °C) or 50 °C for 72 hours. We aimed to prepare films of V2CTx under different etching conditions and to assess the effect of the etching environment on their magnetic properties. Exposing MXenes to ambient air is known to spontaneously led to changes in terminal groups (typically halogen groups are replaced by oxygen groups)41 and to undesired degradation of MXene layers. To prevent these alterations, all materials were stored either under vacuum or under argon atmosphere. They were analyzed shortly after their preparation under minimal exposure to ambient air, except during the oxidation treatment in which V2CTx films were purposely exposed to oxygen flow. The experimental conditions of V2AlC etching are described in detail in ESI. The materials prepared in this study and the corresponding experimental conditions are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1 List of materials prepared in this study and the corresponding etching conditions, particularly the acid concentrations. The etching temperature (room temperature) and reaction time (72 hours) were identical in all experiments. Elemental analysis was based on XPS measurements; the materials were measured as a solid powder (DA-ml-V2CTx) and as thin films (with -del- designation). Materials highlighted in the same color are related to each other
image file: d4tc00132j-u1.tif


To exfoliate the layers, a freshly etched multilayered V2CTx (wet powder) was directly intercalated with a 25% tetramethylammonium hydroxide solution. Subsequent series of centrifugation and mechanical shaking yielded a black supernatant of exfoliated V2CTx layers. The exfoliated layers were immediately collected by filtration to prevent their degradation. Each material was denoted by the prefixes del (delaminated) and CA or DA depending on the etching conditions, as described in Table 1 (i.e. CA-del-V2CTx and DA-del-V2CTx). All thin films had a bronze hue. To demonstrate the reproducibility of etching in a diluted acid solution, we prepared delaminated films of V2CTx in two independent experiments to compare their properties and labeled them as DA-del-V2CTx (1) and DA-del-V2CTx (2). In their PXRD patterns (Fig. 2), all films have the same profile with similar intensities, and the (002) peak has the same position at 6.9° 2θ (corresponding to d-spacing 1.28 nm). Only DA-del-V2CTx (1) shows low intensity peaks of the parent MAX phase, indicating a minor fraction of unreacted V2AlC.


image file: d4tc00132j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Comparison of PXRD patterns of delaminated V2CTx thin films. Films prepared from multilayered V2CTx after etching in concentrated acid solutions are indicated with the prefix CA. Films prepared using a diluted acid solution are indicated with the prefix DA. DA-del-V2CTx were prepared in two batches, designated by (1) and (2). (b) Optical image of the DA-del-V2CTx (1) thin film. (c) ADF-STEM image of DA-del-V2CTx (1).

Characterization of V2CTx films

STEM of V2CTx films. By STEM, we characterized the delaminated V2CTx materials (Fig. 3) using two approaches to sample preparation, namely (a) dropping the suspension of freshly delaminated V2CTx onto the TEM grid, and (b) crushing a film prepared by filtration of the delaminated V2CTx suspension before analyzing the sample. The STEM image of CA-del-V2CTx (Fig. 3a) reveals a particle with holes across the flake. Fig. 3b shows a DA-del-V2CTx (2) particle with a similar size, also riddled with holes and disruptions (more STEM images of DA-ml-V2CTx and DA-del-V2CTx (1) are provided in ESI, Fig. S11). The STEM image of DA-ml-V2CTx included in Fig. S11 (ESI) shows a block of crystallites with no obvious damage. Nevertheless, damage is more difficult to evaluate in a large, thick block of stacked layers than in a very thin flake in delaminated DA-del-V2CTx (2) or CA-del-V2CTx. The delaminated materials prepared by etching with diluted acid contained smaller but more abundant holes than those prepared in concentrated acids. In both materials, the suspension of delaminated V2CTx (CA-del-V2CTx, and DA-del-V2CTx (2)) contained assemblies, most of which consisting of five to ten MXene layers, albeit with thinner assemblies and even a few monolayers as well. Furthermore, their interlayer distance analysis indicated the same d-spacing value, that is, 0.98 nm (d-spacing means the distance from the center of one layer to the center of the neighboring layer).
image file: d4tc00132j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Scanning transmission electron microscopy images of delaminated V2CTx analyzed (a)–(d) directly from the suspension of delaminated V2CTx (the delaminated V2CTx in the suspension was dropped onto the TEM grid directly after its preparation) and (e) and (f) as a film (after the filtration of the suspension, forming a thin film).

The films of delaminated V2CTx are displayed in Fig. 3e and f. In these films, the interlayer distance was 1.15–1.2 nm in DA-del-V2CTx (2) FILM and 0.97 nm in CA-del-V2CTx FILM. The d-spacing calculated from the (002) position in the PXRD pattern of the films was 1.28 nm. In contrast to these materials, the samples shown in Fig. 3c and d were prepared from the suspension of delaminated V2CTx, not the film. As determined by PXRD and STEM, the differences in d-spacing of the same films may be attributed to the treatment of these materials prior to analysis. For instance, the PXRD patterns of the films were measured on materials prepared by filtration of the suspension of delaminated V2CTx. As a result, the layer assemblies stacked on top of each other during the filtration.

Subsequently, the films were dried under vacuum, crushed into a powder and analyzed. As the delaminated V2CTx in suspension is dropped directly onto the holey-carbon copper TEM grid and then vacuumed under the STEM, water molecules between layers should more easily desorb (or de-intercalate) from a few layer assemblies than from films in which all layers are stacked on top of each other. As expected, when the films were crushed to a powder, deposited onto the TEM grid, and then exposed to high vacuum in situ within the STEM microscope, another portion of intercalated water molecules was desorbed. This desorption is thought to be the main reason for the discrepancy between d-spacings calculated based on powder XRD patterns and those determined from STEM images.

Stability of V2CTx films in oxygen flow. This research aimed at unravelling the relationship between V2CTx surface functional groups and the magnetic properties of these materials. The degradation of MXenes materials or at least changes in their surface groups when they are exposed to air, moisture and/or light is often described in the literature,40,42 as well as the effect of etching conditions on the composition of surface groups.43 Based on our DFT study, the surface functional groups in V2CTx with an O/F ratio above 2 should induce a ferromagnetic state. To achieve such a significant change in functional groups while avoiding a complete oxidation of the MXene, we exposed selected del-V2CTx films to a stream of oxygen at room temperature (for 4 and 8 hours). By XPS analysis, we assessed changes in surface groups and chemical composition (for experimental details, see ESI).
Aging of V2CTx film. To test V2CTx films with markedly different O/F ratios, we also stored the CA-del-V2CTx film for 10 months under vacuum in a desiccator. The PXRD pattern of the 10-month-old film was almost identical to that of a fresh CA-del-V2CTx sample (see Fig. S12, ESI). Changes in terminal groups of the 10-month-old film were further promoted by treatment with oxygen flow for 8 hours. Once again, the PXRD pattern did not reveal any significant change, but the XPS analysis showed that the composition of this film differed from that of the fresh film, as discussed in depth below.
XPS analysis of V2CTx materials. All materials were analyzed by XPS shortly after their preparation as published in a study by Vorotilo and Gogotsi44 on the synthesis of the V2AlC parent phase. By XPS, we can study the surface chemistry of materials into depths of 5–10 nm. In the C 1s spectra of all V2CTx materials, the C–V component at approximately 282 eV confirmed the presence of an MXene phase (Fig. S15, ESI). Beyond qualitative insights into the MXene surface, quantitative XPS analysis enables us to determine the chemical composition of V2CTx materials. The ratio between the total vanadium photoemission signal and the carbon component ranged from 2.00[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.65 to 0.80 (Table 1), differing from the expected 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio. Nevertheless, this discrepancy has also been described in other publications39,43–45 and is likely related to multiple factors that impair the fit. These factors include the presence of oxygen in the carbon sublattice, defects introduced during the etching, the overlap of the V 2p signal with that of the O 1s signal, and the asymmetric shape of some components and satellites.

Multilayered powder DA-ml-V2CTx and the corresponding film, DA-del-V2CTx (1), have very similar chemical compositions, V2C0.80F0.96O0.90 and V2C0.71F1.05O1.02, respectively. In V 2p photoemission spectra of both materials, the strongest contribution is associated with V3+ at 515 eV (Fig. 4). The peak at 513 eV is attributed to V2+, indicating the presence of an unreacted V2AlC phase.42,46 Traces of unreacted V2AlC are also visible in the XRD pattern of DA-ml-V2CTx and DA-del-V2CTx (1) (Fig. 2). However, the V-C peak overlaps at the same binding energy (∼513 eV), which increases the peak.42 The peak at ∼516 eV is assigned to the V4+ component of a monolayer of vanadium oxide on the surface of vanadium carbide.39,42,46 The weak signal at ∼518 eV is assigned to the V5+ component, suggesting only minimal surface oxidation and thus the formation of vanadium oxide.


image file: d4tc00132j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Component peak-fitting of XPS spectra of parent V2AlC, multilayered DA-ml-V2CTx and all delaminated films V2CTx.

Two V2CTx films prepared under the same conditions, that is, treatment with diluted acids (DA-del-V2CTx (1) and DA-del-V2CTx (2)) had virtually identical chemical compositions and very similar XPS profiles (data fitting is shown in Table S2, ESI). The similarity of these two samples prepared by repeating the etching procedure in diluted acid solutions supports the reproducibility of this etching protocol.

The CA-del-V2CTx film prepared in a concentrated acid solution had a higher concentration of fluorine groups and a lower concentration of oxygen groups, V2C0.65F1.18O0.77, than the films prepared in diluted acids, V2C0.69–0.71F1.05–1.06O1.02–1.07. In a previous study, the chemical stability of V2CTx materials has been tested by heating multilayered V2CTx powders up to 600 °C in nitrogen, carbon dioxide, air or hydrogen atmosphere, monitoring changes by Raman spectroscopy and XPS.42 Here, we tested the stability of V2CTx films by exposing the films to oxygen for 4 and 8 hours. We applied only mild conditions at room temperature because we intended to replace fluorine groups on the V2CTx surface whilst avoiding vanadium oxidation into vanadium oxide. Our theoretical calculations indicated that V2CTx would be a ferromagnetic material if the oxygen groups prevailed on the surface (the computational findings are discussed above). Based on our XPS analysis, after 4 (DA-del-4O2-V2CTx) and 8 (DA-del-8O2-V2CTx) hours in oxygen flow, the films displayed only a slightly lower F/O ratio than fresh DA-del-V2CTx (1) (see Table 1).

The V3+/V5+ ratio can be used as an indicator of the undesired transformation of V2CTx MXene into vanadium oxide. The fresh film DA-del-V2CTx (1) has a V3+/V5+ ratio of 2.98, but after 4 and 8 hours in oxygen, the films have V3+/V5+ ratios of 2.51 and 2.3, respectively. This decrease in V3+/V5+ ratio indicates that the concentration of vanadium oxide increases due to oxygen exposure. However, the concentration of fluorine groups remains relatively high (V2C0.71–0.74F0.88–0.94O1.08–1.4). After 10 months of storage in a desiccator, the film prepared in concentrated acid solution, CA-del-V2CTx, was also exposed to oxygen flow for 8 hours to assess surface changes. The V3+[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]V5+ ratio significantly dropped from 4.02 to 1.79, and the overall composition changed from V2C0.65F1.18O0.77 to V2C0.71F0.87O1.74. This result demonstrates that the V2CTx film is slowly degraded even when stored in a desiccator, but fluorine groups remain in the composition and are not arbitrarily exchanged for oxygen groups, as proposed in previous studies.40,42

Magnetic measurements. Magnetic properties of selected samples were investigated by superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometry. The variation of molar susceptibility as a function of temperature, χ(T), is shown in Fig. 5. In line with previous reports,47,48 the parent V2AlC sample was not strongly affected by the variation in temperature, which is typical of metallic, Pauli paramagnetism. In turn, the V2CTx samples revealed a temperature-dependent paramagnetic contribution, albeit with a striking difference between multi-layered DA-ml-V2CTx and other delaminated thin film samples. While a dominant Curie-type paramagnetism is clearly visible in the χ(T) of DA-ml-V2CTx, the other χ(T) curves show a superposition of the Curie and Pauli paramagnetism, as reported for differently functionalized multi-layered Ti3C2Tx MXenes.34 Here, the two components were analyzed by fitting the experimental data with the modified Curie–Weiss law:
 
image file: d4tc00132j-t1.tif(1)
where χ stands for the molar magnetic susceptibility; C, for the Curie constant; θP, for the paramagnetic Curie temperature; and χ0, for the temperature-independent Pauli contribution. In a fully localized system, χ0 limits to zero, and the term (1) follows the standard Curie–Weiss law, while for the paramagnetism due to conduction electrons, C limits to zero, and only the Pauli term remains.

image file: d4tc00132j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Variation of the molar susceptibility as a function of temperature, χ(T). Panel (a) shows the full temperature range, while panel (b) corresponds to the low temperature – low susceptibility region, which reveals fine details between individual samples.

For samples with realistic C values, the effective magnetic moment was calculated using the following formula:

 
image file: d4tc00132j-t2.tif(2)
where Na stands for the Avogadro number; kB, for the Boltzmann constant; μ0, for the permeability of vacuum; and μB, for the Bohr magneton. Before the analysis, the molar magnetic susceptibilities calculated in different magnetic fields were compared to confirm the expected invariance. For the V2AlC sample, the magnetic susceptibilities did not coincide, indicating ferromagnetic impurity. Thus, the molar susceptibility was corrected using the following formula:
 
image file: d4tc00132j-t3.tif(3)
where μ1 and μ2 stand for the molar magnetic susceptibilities in two different magnetic fields, B1 and B2.

The parameters derived from the fit of the modified Curie–Weiss law are outlined in Table S3 (ESI). Our analysis confirmed that Pauli paramagnetism occurs in V2AlC (χ0 = 9.3 × 10−8 m3 mol−1) and that localized paramagnetism prevails in multi-layered DA-ml-V2CTx, with μeff = 1.67μB, which is close to the theoretical spin-only value of the free V4+ ion (1.73μB). In the samples with “mixed” paramagnetism, μeff ranges from 0.55 to 0.61μB, and χ0 ranges from 2.3 × 10−9 to 2.9 × 10−8 m3 mol−1. In all samples with Curie paramagnetism, the θP values are <2 K, which is consistent with the absence of a long-range magnetic order down to 2 K.

The magnetization isotherms, M(H) recorded at 4 and 300 K, shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. S13 (ESI), respectively, corroborate the proposed scenario. The M(H) of V2AlC is almost identical at both temperatures, as expected for temperature-independent Pauli paramagnetism. A closer inspection of the M(H) curve around the origin reveals moderate hysteresis (∼50 mT), which may be attributed to ferromagnetic impurity revealed by molar susceptibility analysis. The M(H) of DA-ml-V2CTx, recorded at 4 K has a clear Brillouin-type character, reaching ∼0.6μB f.u.−1 at 7 T, while the other samples reach much lower values (∼0.05–0.1μB f.u.−1 at 7 T), as expected for “mixed” paramagnetism.


image file: d4tc00132j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Magnetization isotherms recorded at 4 K. Panel (a) shows the full-scale range, while panel (b) corresponds to the low magnetization region, which reveals fine details between individual samples.

Based on our XPS analysis (Table 1), multilayered DA-ml-V2CTx powder has a similar chemical composition to that of the thin film DA-del-V2CTx (1), which was prepared from DA-ml-V2CTx by organic intercalation and delamination (V2C0.80F0.96O0.90vs. V2C0.71F1.05O1.02, respectively). In both samples, the ratio between F and O groups is approximately 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1. Nevertheless, the DA-ml-V2CTx powder displays localized paramagnetism, with μeff = 1.67μB, while the thin film DA-del-V2CTx (1) shows “mixed” (metallic and localized) paramagnetism with μeff = 0.55μB. These differences in magnetic properties may be explained by differences in the integrity of crystallites as thin films crystallites contain numerous holes and cracks (evidenced by STEM images).

The main difference in chemical composition was identified between the fresh film CA-del-V2CTx and the same film after 10 months (and additionally after 8 hours in oxygen flow) CA-del-8O2-V2CTx (V2C0.65F1.18O0.77vs. V2C0.71F0.87O1.74, respectively). Even when significantly varying the O/F ratio from 0.65[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 to 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, the two films displayed similar magnetism, that is, mixed paramagnetism, with effective magnetic moments of 0.56 and 0.61μB, respectively.

Although ab initio calculations usually predict a localized magnetic moment on V and a long-range magnetic order aligned with temperatures from units to tens of Kelvin,48 our experimental results rule out a ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic order of localized magnetic moments on V. Instead, most V2CTx samples revealed superposition of metallic (Pauli) and localized paramagnetism, except for multi-layered DA-ml-V2CTx, nearing localized magnetism. This magnetic behavior can be understood considering the complexity of materials, in contrast to idealized theoretical models. Real samples contain various types of defects, local functionalization inhomogeneities and holes and cracks in crystallites (as evidenced by microscopy). Thus, the stable, long-range magnetism of fully localized spins is most likely suppressed by the intrinsic structural and spin disorder. Moreover, the magnetic properties are more affected by the crystallite sizes, shapes and the level of their disruption (for instance, holes and cracks) than by the actual chemical composition (particularly O/F ratio).

Ultimately, inconsistencies between experimental observations and theoretical predictions underscore the need for a more realistic description of magnetism in such complex materials. However, the level of crystallite damage during the etching and delamination process is difficult to predict. For now, this task remains highly challenging, if not impossible.

Conclusions

DFT calculations indicate that multi-layered and ultrathin film Vanadium MXenes, V2CTx, are ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic depending on the relative concentration of oxygen and fluorine surface atoms. Nevertheless, the corresponding V2CTx materials do not display the predicted behavior. Chemical analysis and magnetic measurements highlight the importance of the preparation pathway rather than the actual chemical composition and form of V2CTx MXene. Films with strikingly different chemical compositions (in terms of O/F ratio) show matching magnetism. Conversely, materials with virtually identical chemical compositions differ in their magnetism whether they are powders or films, most likely due to the generation of additional defects and cracks and to the disruption of crystallites during the intercalation and exfoliation processes. Similarly, the magnetic properties may be affected by the size and shape of the crystallites. Therefore, tapping into the potential of MXenes predicted by many theoretical studies requires developing experimental procedures for preserving MXene crystallites as intact as possible whilst enabling targeted modifications of surface terminal groups.

Experimental

V2AlC MAX phase was purchased from Laizhou Kai Kai Ceramic Materials Co., Ltd.

Etching

Concentrated HF (29 M) and concentrated (12 M) or diluted (6 M) HCl were mixed in a plastic container. The acidic solution was cooled down to approximately 0 °C in an ice bath. The MAX phase V2AlC was added in small portions to prevent undesired overheating and oxidation (1 gram was added over a period of 30 minutes), ensuring an appropriate and stable stirring, which is a crucial requirement. The ratios between the MAX phase and the acid solutions were 1 gram per 12 ml of 29 M HF and 8 ml of 12 M or 6 M HCl. The reaction vessel was loosely covered with a plastic top with two holes to allow the hydrogen gas to escape. The reaction was performed at 50 °C in an oil bath or at room temperature (24 °C) for 72 hours. After the reaction, the solid powder was separated through several cycles of centrifugation, decantation and deionized water addition until reaching pH 5–6. The solid fraction was subsequently separated by filtration using PVDF membrane filters. The multilayered V2CTx (ml-V2CTx) was designated by the prefix CA when using concentrated acid solutions for etching and by the prefix DA when using concentrated HF and diluted HCl.

Intercalation of tetramethylammonium cations and delamination

The freshly etched multilayered ml-V2CTx was directly mixed with a 25 wt% tetramethylammonium hydroxide solution (TMA-OH), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 hours (ratio 1 gram + 4 ml TMA-OH +16 ml H2O). Then, the mixture was separated by centrifugation (3500 rpm for 10 minutes), subsequently discarding the first supernatant and adding fresh deionized water before subjecting the mixture to mechanical shaking for 4 minutes followed by centrifugation (2500 rpm for 10 minutes). The supernatant was then collected into a glass flask, repeating this cycle several times. Lastly, the supernatant was filtered using PVDF membrane filters, and the resulting del-V2CTx film was dried under vacuum at room temperature (for 24 hours). All films were stored under vacuum or in argon atmosphere.

Stability test in oxygen flow

A sample of the del-V2CTx film was treated in an oxygen flow 50–120 ml min−1 to test its stability and to assess the effect of oxygen on the terminal groups. For this purpose, the sample was loaded onto the frit bed and exposed to the stream of oxygen for 4 or 8 hours therein (see Fig. S11, ESI). Subsequently, the film was directly analyzed by XRD and then stored under argon. The XPS and magnetic measurements were performed shortly thereafter. The materials were denoted by DA-del-4O2-V2CTx and DA-del-8O2-V2CTx. The sample CA-del-V2CTx was stored for 10 months under vacuum in a desiccator and then exposed to oxygen flow for 8 hours to compare the XPS spectra and the magnetic behavior of the fresh sample with those of the old sample exposed to oxygen. This sample was denoted by CA-del-8O2-V2CTx.

Characterization

Powder XRD patterns were collected on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a DLYNXEYE XE-T detector in Bragg–Brentano geometry using Cu Kα (λ[thin space (1/6-em)] = [thin space (1/6-em)]1.54056[thin space (1/6-em)]Å) radiation operated at 30 mA and 40 kV. Data were collected in continuous mode over a 2θ range of 1–70°.

The chemical composition of the samples was measured on an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer equipped with a non-monochromatized Mg Kα X-ray source (1253.6 eV) and with a Phoibos 150 (SPECS GmbH, Germany) hemispherical analyzer operating in Fixed Analyzer Transmission (FAT) mode. After their preparation, the samples were kept under argon atmosphere for protection and mounted on a carbon double tape placed on a sample holder for XPS analysis. Survey spectra were collected at 40 eV pass energy, 0.5 eV step size, and 100 ms dwell time. Core-level spectra of O 1s, V 2p, N 1s, C 1s, F 1s, Cl 2p and Al 2p were collected at 20 eV pass energy, 0.05 eV step size and 100 ms dwell time. The satellite peaks from the non-monochromatized Mg X-ray source at 8.4 and 10.2 eV displacements and with 8.0 and 4.1% relative intensities, respectively, were filtered out of the spectra. The data were analyzed using KolXPD fitting software (KolXPD, Kolibrik.net, Czech Republic). All photoemission spectra were fitted with a mixture of Lorentzian and Gaussian function profiles after a Shirley background subtraction.

SEM images were obtained under a JEOL JSM-IT800 microscope using a secondary electron detector. Images were taken at a 1 kV accelerating voltage. All samples were deposited on conductive carbon tape mounted onto the SEM holder.

STEM images were acquired under a JEOL NEOARM 200 F microscope equipped with a Schottky-type field emission gun at 200 kV accelerating voltage, with annular dark-field (ADF) detector.

Details on the computational methods are described in ESI.

The magnetic properties of the samples were measured using a properly calibrated MPMS XL-7 device (SQUID magnetometer, Quantum Design). Kept under an argon protective atmosphere, the samples were rapidly transferred in a gelatine capsule, fixed in polystyrene onto a sample holder with a negligible background signal, and inserted inside the sample chamber of the magnetometer, which was evacuated and flushed with inert helium gas three times. The experiments were performed under helium gas exchange to enable fast sample thermalization. The variation of magnetization as a function of temperature, M(T), was recorded at a constant magnetic field of 1, 2, and 4 T with a 2 K step after cooling the sample in the remnant field of the superconducting coil (below 0.5 mT). Magnetization isotherms, M(H), were recorded at 4 K and 300 K under varying magnetic fields up to ±7 T with a 0.5 T step. All magnetization data were recalculated to the molar units using the mass determined from XPS experiments.

Author contributions

P. E., M. I. H. M., R. E. M. and P. N. conceived the research project and planned the experimental work. P. E. synthesized and characterized the materials and analyzed the data. B. Š. performed XPS measurements and data analysis. J. K. V. performed magnetic measurements and data analysis. M. M. and D. N. R. performed the STEM and SEM analysis, respectively. S. L., F. B., and P. N. performed simulations. The data were discussed among all co-authors. P. E. wrote the draft that was edited by all authors. All authors have approved the final version of this manuscript, except for P. N. who passed away in December 2022. The authors would like to dedicate this paper to his memory.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by OP VVV “Excellent Research Teams” project no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000417 – CUCAM. P. E. would like to also acknowledge the Czech Science Foundation for the ExPro project (19-27551X). Computational resources and low-temperature infrastructure were supplied by the projects “e-Infrastruktura CZ” (e-INFRA CZ LM2018140) and MGML (LM2023065) supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic. The authors acknowledge the Viničná Microscopy Core Facility (VMCF of the Faculty of Science, Charles University), a facility supported by MEYS CR (LM2023050 Czech-BioImaging), for their support and assistance with this work. The authors thank Dr Carlos V. Melo for editing the manuscript.

Notes and references

  1. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva and A. A. Firsov, Science, 2004, 306, 666–669 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. R. Z. Ma and T. Sasaki, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 5082–5104 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. J. Booth, V. V. Khotkevich, S. V. Morozov and A. K. Geim, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2005, 102, 10451–10453 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. S. Jeong, D. Yoo, J. T. Jang, M. Kim and J. Cheon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 18233–18236 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. J. I. Dawson and R. O. C. Oreffo, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 4069–4086 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. M. Naguib, M. Kurtoglu, V. Presser, J. Lu, J. Niu, M. Heon, L. Hultman, Y. Gogotsi and M. W. Barsoum, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 4248–4253 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. A. VahidMohammadi, J. Rosen and Y. Gogotsi, Science, 2021, 372, eabf1581 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. X. Tang, X. Guo, W. Wu and G. Wang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1801897 CrossRef.
  9. Q. Zhu, J. Li, P. Simon and B. Xu, Energy Storage Mater., 2021, 35, 630–660 CrossRef.
  10. A. Agresti, A. Pazniak, S. Pescetelli, A. Di Vito, D. Rossi, A. Pecchia, M. Auf der Maur, A. Liedl, R. Larciprete, D. V. Kuznetsov, D. Saranin and A. Di Carlo, Nat. Mater., 2019, 18, 1228–1234 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. T. P. Nguyen, D. M. Tuan Nguyen, D. L. Tran, H. K. Le, D.-V. N. Vo, S. S. Lam, R. S. Varma, M. Shokouhimehr, C. C. Nguyen and Q. V. Le, Mol. Catal., 2020, 486, 110850 CrossRef CAS.
  12. X. Fan, Y. Yang, X. Shi, Y. Liu, H. Li, J. Liang and Y. Chen, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30, 2007110 CrossRef CAS.
  13. M. Han, D. Zhang, C. E. Shuck, B. McBride, T. Zhang, R. Wang, K. Shevchuk and Y. Gogotsi, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2023, 18, 373–379 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. B. Anasori, M. R. Lukatskaya and Y. Gogotsi, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2017, 2, 16098 CrossRef CAS.
  15. V. Kamysbayev, A. S. Filatov, H. Hu, X. Rui, F. Lagunas, D. Wang, R. F. Klie and D. V. Talapin, Science, 2020, 369, 979–983 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. M. Seredych, C. E. Shuck, D. Pinto, M. Alhabeb, E. Precetti, G. Deysher, B. Anasori, N. Kurra and Y. Gogotsi, Chem. Mater., 2019, 31, 3324–3332 CrossRef CAS.
  17. I. Persson, L.-Å. Näslund, J. Halim, M. W. Barsoum, V. Darakchieva, J. Palisaitis, J. Rosen and P. O. Å. Persson, 2D Mater., 2018, 5, 015002 CrossRef.
  18. J. L. Hart, K. Hantanasirisakul, A. C. Lang, B. Anasori, D. Pinto, Y. Pivak, J. T. van Omme, S. J. May, Y. Gogotsi and M. L. Taheri, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 522 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. I. Persson, J. Halim, T. W. Hansen, J. B. Wagner, V. Darakchieva, J. Palisaitis, J. Rosen and P. O. Å. Persson, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30, 1909005 CrossRef CAS.
  20. W. Hong, B. C. Wyatt, S. K. Nemani and B. Anasori, MRS Bull., 2020, 45, 850–861 CrossRef.
  21. N. C. Frey, J. Wang, G. I. Vega Bellido, B. Anasori, Y. Gogotsi and V. B. Shenoy, ACS Nano, 2019, 13, 3031–3041 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. J. He, G. Ding, C. Zhong, S. Li, D. Li and G. Zhang, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 356–364 RSC.
  23. J. J. He, P. B. Lyu, L. Z. Sun, A. M. Garcia and P. Nachtigall, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 6500–6509 RSC.
  24. J. J. He, P. B. Lyu and P. Nachtigall, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 11143–11149 RSC.
  25. J. J. He, G. Q. Ding, C. Y. Zhong, S. Li, D. F. Li and G. Zhang, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 356–364 RSC.
  26. X. Yang and S. Dong, J. Chem. Phys., 2024, 160, 014705 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. M. Khazaei, A. Ranjbar, M. Arai, T. Sasaki and S. Yunoki, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 2488–2503 RSC.
  28. J. P. Hu, B. Xu, C. Y. Ouyang, S. Y. A. Yang and Y. G. Yao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 24274–24281 CrossRef CAS.
  29. C. Si, J. Zhou and Z. M. Sun, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 17510–17515 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. H. Kumar, N. C. Frey, L. Dong, B. Anasori, Y. Gogotsi and V. B. Shenoy, ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 7648–7655 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. Y. Li, M. Lai, M. Hu, S. Zhao, B. Liu and J.-J. Kai, Sustainable Mater. Technol., 2022, 34, e00516 CrossRef CAS.
  32. K. Hantanasirisakul, B. Anasori, S. Nemsak, J. L. Hart, J. Wu, Y. Yang, R. V. Chopdekar, P. Shafer, A. F. May, E. J. Moon, J. Zhou, Q. Zhang, M. L. Taheri, S. J. May and Y. Gogotsi, Nanoscale Horiz., 2020, 5, 1557–1565 RSC.
  33. X. Xiao, P. Urbankowski, K. Hantanasirisakul, Y. Yang, S. Sasaki, L. Yang, C. Chen, H. Wang, L. Miao, S. H. Tolbert, S. J. L. Billinge, H. D. Abruña, S. J. May and Y. Gogotsi, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29, 1809001 CrossRef.
  34. B. Scheibe, K. Tadyszak, M. Jarek, N. Michalak, M. Kempiński, M. Lewandowski, B. Peplińska and K. Chybczyńska, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 479, 216–224 CrossRef CAS.
  35. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1993, 47, 558–561 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. H. Tan, C. Wang, H. Duan, J. Tian, Q. Ji, Y. Lu, F. Hu, W. Hu, G. Li, N. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chu, Z. Sun and W. Yan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13, 33363–33370 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. A. Champagne, L. Shi, T. Ouisse, B. Hackens and J.-C. Charlier, Phys. Rev. B, 2018, 97, 115439 CrossRef CAS.
  38. G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson and H. Jónsson, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2006, 36, 354–360 CrossRef.
  39. M. Naguib, J. Halim, J. Lu, K. M. Cook, L. Hultman, Y. Gogotsi and M. W. Barsoum, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 15966–15969 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. K. Matthews, T. Zhang, C. E. Shuck, A. VahidMohammadi and Y. Gogotsi, Chem. Mat., 2022, 34, 499–509 CrossRef CAS.
  41. J. Halim, K. M. Cook, M. Naguib, P. Eklund, Y. Gogotsi, J. Rosen and M. W. Barsoum, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 362, 406–417 CrossRef CAS.
  42. R. Thakur, A. VahidMohammadi, J. Moncada, W. R. Adams, M. Chi, B. Tatarchuk, M. Beidaghi and C. A. Carrero, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 10716–10726 RSC.
  43. R. Ibragimova, P. Rinke and H.-P. Komsa, Chem. Mat., 2022, 34, 2896–2906 CrossRef CAS.
  44. S. Vorotilo, C. E. Shuck, M. Anayee, M. Shekhirev, K. Matthews, R. W. Lord, R. Wang, I. Roslyk, V. Balitskiy, V. Zahorodna, O. Gogotsi and Y. Gogotsi, Graph. 2D Mater., 2023, 93–105 CrossRef.
  45. L.-Å. Näslund and I. Persson, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2022, 593, 153442 CrossRef.
  46. A. VahidMohammadi, A. Hadjikhani, S. Shahbazmohamadi and M. Beidaghi, ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 11135–11144 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. C. M. Hamm, M. Dürrschnabel, L. Molina-Luna, R. Salikhov, D. Spoddig, M. Farle, U. Wiedwald and C. S. Birkel, Mater. Chem. Front., 2018, 2, 483–490 RSC.
  48. S. Bae, Y. G. Kang, M. Khazaei, K. Ohno, Y. H. Kim, M. J. Han, K. J. Chang and H. Raebiger, Mater. Today Adv., 2021, 9, 100118 CrossRef CAS.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4tc00132j
Deceased.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.