Issue 15, 2024

Dry reforming of HCs (methane, ethane, and propane) over a 40Ni0.75(Ce1−xFex)0.25/Al2O3 catalyst: a comparative study

Abstract

Reports of dry reforming of methane, ethane, and propane to synthesis gas using the same catalyst are very limited in the open literature. The present study is basically a comparative analysis of methane, ethane and propane for dry reforming reaction considering the catalyst 40Ni0.75(Ce0.75Fe0.25)0.25/Al2O3 and under similar operating conditions. A series of catalysts denoted as 40Ni0.75(Ce1−xFex)0.25/Al2O3 (where x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1) were synthesized via the sol–gel method, and their catalytic efficacy was assessed for the dry reforming of aliphatic saturated hydrocarbons (methane, ethane, and propane). Comprehensive catalyst characterization resulted through the BET, XRD, H2-TPR, CO2-TPD, Raman spectroscopy, TGA, and FE-SEM analyses. The study revealed that the Ni–Ce species were effectively dispersed over the alumina support. The robust interactions between the nickel and the support significantly enhanced the nickel dispersion and stability. In addition to syngas, the formation of CNTs was also witnessed on the used catalyst's surface, a finding substantiated through FE-SEM and Raman spectral analysis. In the dry reforming of methane (DRM), CO2 exhibited superior conversion compared to methane, whereas in the dry reforming of ethane (DRE) and propane (DRP), the conversion of ethane and propane, respectively, was predominant. The incorporation of a minimal iron fraction into the catalyst exhibited pronounced enhancements in catalytic performance, with the catalyst containing ceria–iron (x = 0.25) manifesting the highest product yield and conversion percentages (HC and CO2).

Graphical abstract: Dry reforming of HCs (methane, ethane, and propane) over a 40Ni0.75(Ce1−xFex)0.25/Al2O3 catalyst: a comparative study

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
06 Apr 2024
Accepted
14 Jun 2024
First published
14 Jun 2024

Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2024,8, 3372-3385

Dry reforming of HCs (methane, ethane, and propane) over a 40Ni0.75(Ce1−xFex)0.25/Al2O3 catalyst: a comparative study

A. S. Rajput and T. Das, Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2024, 8, 3372 DOI: 10.1039/D4SE00467A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements