Raphaël 
            Salles
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Wei Church 
            Poh
          
        
      b, 
      
        
          
            Maxime 
            Laurans
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Florence 
            Volatron
          
        
       a, 
      
        
          
            Antoine 
            Miche
          
        
      c, 
      
        
          
            Sandra 
            Alves
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Christian 
            Carino
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Ludovic 
            Tortech
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Guillaume 
            Izzet
a, 
      
        
          
            Antoine 
            Miche
          
        
      c, 
      
        
          
            Sandra 
            Alves
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Christian 
            Carino
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Ludovic 
            Tortech
          
        
      a, 
      
        
          
            Guillaume 
            Izzet
          
        
       a, 
      
        
          
            Pooi See 
            Lee
a, 
      
        
          
            Pooi See 
            Lee
          
        
       *b and 
      
        
          
            Anna 
            Proust
*b and 
      
        
          
            Anna 
            Proust
          
        
       *a
*a
      
aSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut Parisien de Chimie Moléculaire, IPCM, F-75005 Paris, France. E-mail: anna.proust@sorbonne-universite.fr
      
bSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore. E-mail: pslee@ntu.edu.sg
      
cSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de réactivité de surface, LRS, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France
    
First published on 21st November 2023
As nano-sized molecular oxides, polyoxometalates (POMs) hold great promise in non-volatile memory materials based on redox-active molecules. Materials processed from solution, by drop-casting, by embedding POMs in polymers, or using layer-by-layer deposition techniques have thus been reported and successfully investigated. Almost all of these examples are electrostatically assembled materials. We herein propose an original route for the elaboration of robust covalent POM networks, to seek the influence of the shaping process on the POM-to-POM communication and the final device performance. Capitalizing on our experience in the handling of organic–inorganic POM hybrids, we have prepared diazonium hybrids to harness the propensity of diazonium salts to form multi-layered materials upon electrochemical reduction. A few nanometers thick materials have thus been grown onto ITO electrodes and have shown to be potentially suitable for write-once-read-many (WORM) devices, with a low set voltage.
The electronic properties of the POM-based molecular materials are strongly related to the POM chemical structure and to their shaping.14 Drop-casting or embedding POMs into polymers15 is simple but gives thick materials with a low control of the packing, resulting in high set/reset voltages7 or complex charge transport mechanisms not really understood yet.16,17 Layer-by-layer deposition on electrodes that allows for more control of the thickness and influence of the number of layers or the nature of the terminal layer has been assessed.5 The dip-coating method has also been investigated, showing that the initial POM concentration and the size of the aggregated nanoclusters have a strong impact on the current measured by scanning tunneling microscopy.18 On our side, we are exploring the POM–electrode interface using POM hybrids bearing anchorable functional groups, such as diazonium or carboxylic acid, allowing their covalent grafting to the electrode.19–21 We have thus devised well organized densely packed POM monolayers and we were able to recover the effect of the nature of POMs on the electron transport properties of vertical POM-based large molecular junctions. We have demonstrated that the electronic properties of POMs in the solution phase, as disclosed by their electrochemical redox potentials, are translated to the solid state in the tunneling barrier energies of the molecular junctions, as extracted from the current/voltage curves. Yet, no hysteresis behavior was observed in these molecular junctions based on POM monolayers. In redox-based systems and valence change memories developed with oxides, the switching mechanism involves an internal ion redistribution with formation/disruption of conductive filaments.22,23 Even if this mechanism is not directly transposable to POM-based materials, conductive channels and gradients of charges are somehow needed. Perhaps not achievable within POM monolayers, this would be more feasible in thicker materials. This prompted us to investigate further the chemistry of POM-based diazonium hybrids.
Whereas it is well known that diazonium is prone to forming multi-layers,24,25 we proposed that the monolayer obtained from [PM11O39{M′C6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4N2+}]3− (M = W, Mo, M′ = Ge, Sn)19,20,26 was due to some steric hindrance brought by the POMs. In the present case, our strategy was to bypass the intrinsic hindrance by the introduction of two organic tethers in bis-silyl derivatives such as [PW11O39{(SiC6H4-C
C-C6H4N2+}]3− (M = W, Mo, M′ = Ge, Sn)19,20,26 was due to some steric hindrance brought by the POMs. In the present case, our strategy was to bypass the intrinsic hindrance by the introduction of two organic tethers in bis-silyl derivatives such as [PW11O39{(SiC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4N2+)2O}]− and [P2W17O61{(SiC6H4-C
C-C6H4N2+)2O}]− and [P2W17O61{(SiC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4N2+)2O}]4−. After electrochemical activation of the diazonium functions, the resulting radicals could attach to the electrode or attack a neighboring aromatic ring, with or without N2 release. This would result in a robust covalent molecular network thicker than a monolayer, with a poor structuration/organization, albeit with a POM-to-POM communication potentially higher than in drop-cast materials or in POM embedded polymers. By enhancing the electronic interactions between adjacent POMs, this could mitigate the intrinsic high resistivity of POM-based materials. We are thus reporting on the formation of POM-based molecular films covalently attached to an ITO electrode and with an extended covalent POM network, thus avoiding unwanted segregation. Preliminary resistive memory tests have been performed showing low SET voltage at around 1.1–1.6 V, potentially suitable for write-once-read-many (WORM) devices.
C-C6H4N2+)2O}]4−. After electrochemical activation of the diazonium functions, the resulting radicals could attach to the electrode or attack a neighboring aromatic ring, with or without N2 release. This would result in a robust covalent molecular network thicker than a monolayer, with a poor structuration/organization, albeit with a POM-to-POM communication potentially higher than in drop-cast materials or in POM embedded polymers. By enhancing the electronic interactions between adjacent POMs, this could mitigate the intrinsic high resistivity of POM-based materials. We are thus reporting on the formation of POM-based molecular films covalently attached to an ITO electrode and with an extended covalent POM network, thus avoiding unwanted segregation. Preliminary resistive memory tests have been performed showing low SET voltage at around 1.1–1.6 V, potentially suitable for write-once-read-many (WORM) devices.
![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2}] KSn[ArNH2], (TBA)3[PW11O39{(SiC6H4-C
C-C6H4NH2}] KSn[ArNH2], (TBA)3[PW11O39{(SiC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2)2O}] KSi[ArNH2] and (TBA)6[P2W17O61{(SiC6H4-C
C-C6H4NH2)2O}] KSi[ArNH2] and (TBA)6[P2W17O61{(SiC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2)2O}] DSi[ArNH2] was achieved through Sonogashira cross-coupling of 4-ethynylaniline with the corresponding iodo-aryl platforms, (TBA)4[PW11O39{SnC6H4I}] KSn[I], (TBA)3[PW11O39{(SiC6H4I)2O}] KSi[I] and (TBA)6[P2W17O61{(SiC6H4I)2O}] DSi[I], catalyzed by bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride and copper(I) iodide in DMF, according to our previously documented procedure.27,28 The previously described (TBA)3[PW11O39{(SiC6H4NH2)2O}] analog29 was not used in this study because we privileged longer organic tethers to favor the formation of a cross-linked POM network. The bi-functionalized species KSi[ArNH2] and DSi[ArNH2] were also anticipated to be more appropriate than the monofunctionalized KSn[ArNH2], that was introduced in the study as a link to our previous work.20 The prepared species have been fully characterized by 1H and 31P NMR, IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and mass-spectrometry, as presented in the ESI (Fig. S1–S6†). The notation K and D refers to the Keggin and Dawson structural types respectively.
C-C6H4NH2)2O}] DSi[ArNH2] was achieved through Sonogashira cross-coupling of 4-ethynylaniline with the corresponding iodo-aryl platforms, (TBA)4[PW11O39{SnC6H4I}] KSn[I], (TBA)3[PW11O39{(SiC6H4I)2O}] KSi[I] and (TBA)6[P2W17O61{(SiC6H4I)2O}] DSi[I], catalyzed by bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride and copper(I) iodide in DMF, according to our previously documented procedure.27,28 The previously described (TBA)3[PW11O39{(SiC6H4NH2)2O}] analog29 was not used in this study because we privileged longer organic tethers to favor the formation of a cross-linked POM network. The bi-functionalized species KSi[ArNH2] and DSi[ArNH2] were also anticipated to be more appropriate than the monofunctionalized KSn[ArNH2], that was introduced in the study as a link to our previous work.20 The prepared species have been fully characterized by 1H and 31P NMR, IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and mass-spectrometry, as presented in the ESI (Fig. S1–S6†). The notation K and D refers to the Keggin and Dawson structural types respectively.
        The remote aniline groups ArNH2 enable the generation of diazonium groups ArN2+ which can be easily activated to produce corresponding aryl radicals along with N2 release. In turn, we expect those radicals to covalently bind on the electrode surface and also to react with neighboring aromatic rings to yield a cross-linked POM-based molecular film, tightly adhered to the substrate. A proposed schematic illustration of the POM molecular film is given in Scheme 2. In our previous studies, the POM hybrids with remote diazonium groups were isolated prior to their grafting on various electrodes.20,26,30–33 The multi-step synthetic pathway involves the preparation of POM hybrids with protected diazonium groups in the form of triazene derivatives and their subsequent deprotection through the addition of trifluoroacetic acid. This ensures the purity of the starting materials, albeit of short life-time, but the use of strong acid also introduces protons as possible POM counter cations. The electrochemical properties of POMs are strongly dependent on their counter cations; therefore, this protection–deprotection step was found to complicate the electrochemical features of the film after grafting.31 For sake of simplicity and to avoid the introduction of adventitious protons, we thus decided to in situ generate the diazonium groups, using a large excess of alkyl-nitrite in an organic solvent, which is largely exemplified in the literature.34 With reference to the NMR information for [PW11O39{SnC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4N2+}]3−KSn[ArN2+] from our previous studies,20 the diazonium groups from [PW11O39{SnC6H4-C
C-C6H4N2+}]3−KSn[ArN2+] from our previous studies,20 the diazonium groups from [PW11O39{SnC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2}]4− could be readily monitored, as depicted in Fig. 1. After the addition of five equivalents of tBuONO new peaks appeared but the resulting spectrum recorded a mixture of compounds. From our experiments, it required at least fifteen equivalents of tBuONO to give rise to the set of signals characteristics of the aryl diazonium function. Further increasing the amount of tBuONO revealed no significant impact. On the other hand, for DSi[ArNH2], the addition of tBuONO only led to a broadening of the peaks. A plausible explanation is that silyl derivatives contain two remote organic functions, which increase intermolecular electrostatic interactions between the POM and the positively charged organic arms and favor their aggregation in solution, as we have observed with other systems.35 As it was difficult to follow the effect of increasing amounts of tBuONO on DSi[ArNH2], we decided to arbitrarily use 15 equivalents determined from the monitoring with KSn[ArNH2] for the subsequent grafting studies described in this work. It is also notable that the attempts to isolate the diazonium substituted POMs from NOBF4 were not successful as previously noted.26 The generation of the diazonium functions reduces the overall charge of the POM hybrids. As a result, the in situ generated KSi[ArN2+] with a single negative charge was poorly soluble in acetonitrile. We thus decided to further investigate the formation of the POM-based film mostly from DSi[ArN2+], which has an overall charge of 4−.
C-C6H4NH2}]4− could be readily monitored, as depicted in Fig. 1. After the addition of five equivalents of tBuONO new peaks appeared but the resulting spectrum recorded a mixture of compounds. From our experiments, it required at least fifteen equivalents of tBuONO to give rise to the set of signals characteristics of the aryl diazonium function. Further increasing the amount of tBuONO revealed no significant impact. On the other hand, for DSi[ArNH2], the addition of tBuONO only led to a broadening of the peaks. A plausible explanation is that silyl derivatives contain two remote organic functions, which increase intermolecular electrostatic interactions between the POM and the positively charged organic arms and favor their aggregation in solution, as we have observed with other systems.35 As it was difficult to follow the effect of increasing amounts of tBuONO on DSi[ArNH2], we decided to arbitrarily use 15 equivalents determined from the monitoring with KSn[ArNH2] for the subsequent grafting studies described in this work. It is also notable that the attempts to isolate the diazonium substituted POMs from NOBF4 were not successful as previously noted.26 The generation of the diazonium functions reduces the overall charge of the POM hybrids. As a result, the in situ generated KSi[ArN2+] with a single negative charge was poorly soluble in acetonitrile. We thus decided to further investigate the formation of the POM-based film mostly from DSi[ArN2+], which has an overall charge of 4−.
|  | ||
| Scheme 2 Proposed schematic illustration of the POM-based molecular film that could form on the electrode by electro-activation of the in situ generated diazonium substituted POM hybrid DSi[ArN2+]. | ||
A solution of 1 mM POM hybrid DSi[ArNH2] was prepared in 0.1 M TBAPF6 in acetonitrile. Upon the addition of 15 equivalents of tBuONO, the formation of a small amount of as yet non-identified precipitate was observed, which might correspond to some POM oligomers. As this is considered undesirable in the close vicinity of the substrate, a five-minute delay was included in our preparation protocol, allowing the precipitate to deposit at the bottom of the cell before the electro-grafting process. Reduction of the in situ formed diazonium function was achieved by applying a potentiodynamic cycle between 0 and −1 V vs. SCE, at a sweep rate of 0.3 V s−1 for 10 times.
After grafting, the ITO substrate was thoroughly washed with CH3CN and DMSO and set back in the cell containing only the supporting electrolyte. Cyclic voltammograms are then run to confirm the presence of immobilized POMs on the substrate (Fig. 2 and S8† for a DSi[Ar] film and a KSi[Ar] film, respectively). In this context, two well defined redox couples are observed, with a first cathodic peak Epc at −0.622 V per SCE and the corresponding anodic peak Epa at −0.568 V per SCE (ΔEp = Epa − Epc = 0.054 V; E1/2 = 1/2(Epa + Epc) = −0.595 V) for DSi[Ar], which agrees well with the electrochemical behavior of DSi[ArNH2] in solution (Fig. S7†) and the E1/2 = −0.57 V per SCE value previously reported for analogous organo-silyl derivatives of Dawson-type POM hybrids in CH3CN solution, at a glassy carbon electrode.36,37 Whereas a value of ΔEp = 0 is expected for immobilized species, non-ideal values of ΔEp have already been observed in our previous studies, implying a slow electron transfer rate. This has been ascribed to a charge effect due to the polyanionic character of the POMs.26,33 Consistently, a lower ΔEp = 0.019 V value is ascribed to a KSi[Ar] film, with Keggin anions of lower charge (Fig. S8†). The POM immobilization at the ITO electrode is also supported by the linear variation of the first cathodic peak intensity with the voltage sweep-rate.
|  | ||
| Fig. 2 Cyclic voltammogram of immobilized DSi[Ar] in CH3CN (0.1 M TBAPF6) at an ITO electrode, potentials given versus SCE electrode, scan rate 0.3 V s−1. | ||
By using the faradaic equation, the integration of the first reduction peak has been used to assess the surface coverage of POMs Γ, with the assumption that all immobilized species are electro-active and that the electrode surface area is accurately known.19,26 In the case of a monolayer of covalently grafted [PW11O39{SnC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4-}]4−, Γ values have been found in the range 9.2 × 10−11 mol cm−2 (onto glassy C) to 10−10 mol cm−2 (onto Si), which is consistent with the values obtained with other molecules like porphyrins or ferrocene and corresponds to a densely packed monolayer.38 This will be used as a benchmark value in the following, as an indicator of the efficiency of the grafting. We will discuss later on the limits of this indicator. Integration of the first reduction peak in Fig. 2 gives Γ = 1.4 × 10−10 mol cm−2 for the DSi[Ar] film. A lower value of 1.1 × 10−11 mol cm−2 was calculated for the KSi[Ar] film described in Fig. S8,† which could be related to the lower solubility of the diazonium precursor. The Γ values calculated for the DSi[Ar] films are higher than those of a monolayer of covalently grafted [PW11O39{SnC6H4-C
C-C6H4-}]4−, Γ values have been found in the range 9.2 × 10−11 mol cm−2 (onto glassy C) to 10−10 mol cm−2 (onto Si), which is consistent with the values obtained with other molecules like porphyrins or ferrocene and corresponds to a densely packed monolayer.38 This will be used as a benchmark value in the following, as an indicator of the efficiency of the grafting. We will discuss later on the limits of this indicator. Integration of the first reduction peak in Fig. 2 gives Γ = 1.4 × 10−10 mol cm−2 for the DSi[Ar] film. A lower value of 1.1 × 10−11 mol cm−2 was calculated for the KSi[Ar] film described in Fig. S8,† which could be related to the lower solubility of the diazonium precursor. The Γ values calculated for the DSi[Ar] films are higher than those of a monolayer of covalently grafted [PW11O39{SnC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4-}]4− (KSn[Ar]) as previously reported but much lower than what we expected for a thick film. Moreover, batch-to-batch variability was observed, with values generally in the range 0.7–2.4 × 10−10 mol cm−2 (mean value 1.5 on about twenty grafting experiments). This prompted us to further characterize the substrates. An AFM image of a representative film is presented in Fig. 3 together with a height profile, revealing a thick holey film of several hundreds of nm (Fig. 3, left). In some other cases, the film appeared to cover the substrate but still with deep valleys (Fig. 3, middle). Further insights were given by scanning electron microscopy analysis coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), run either at the top of the film or in a depleted zone, as depicted in Fig. 4. Whereas the expected peak corresponding to tungsten is observed when the spectrum is recorded in the depleted region, it is completely concealed by intense carbon, fluoride and phosphorus peaks that dominate the EDS spectrum of the top regions. This unveils that the POM layer is coated with an imperfect but thick layer of the supporting electrolyte TBAPF6, that has resisted thorough washing with CH3CN and DMSO. A similar behavior has been observed with 4-iodoaniline and cannot thus be ascribed to the POMs. Fortunately, the electrolyte coating can be eliminated by ultrasonication of the substrate in pure CH3CN for ten minutes as demonstrated by the AFM image on Fig. 3 (right) and a height profile of a few nanometers.
C-C6H4-}]4− (KSn[Ar]) as previously reported but much lower than what we expected for a thick film. Moreover, batch-to-batch variability was observed, with values generally in the range 0.7–2.4 × 10−10 mol cm−2 (mean value 1.5 on about twenty grafting experiments). This prompted us to further characterize the substrates. An AFM image of a representative film is presented in Fig. 3 together with a height profile, revealing a thick holey film of several hundreds of nm (Fig. 3, left). In some other cases, the film appeared to cover the substrate but still with deep valleys (Fig. 3, middle). Further insights were given by scanning electron microscopy analysis coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), run either at the top of the film or in a depleted zone, as depicted in Fig. 4. Whereas the expected peak corresponding to tungsten is observed when the spectrum is recorded in the depleted region, it is completely concealed by intense carbon, fluoride and phosphorus peaks that dominate the EDS spectrum of the top regions. This unveils that the POM layer is coated with an imperfect but thick layer of the supporting electrolyte TBAPF6, that has resisted thorough washing with CH3CN and DMSO. A similar behavior has been observed with 4-iodoaniline and cannot thus be ascribed to the POMs. Fortunately, the electrolyte coating can be eliminated by ultrasonication of the substrate in pure CH3CN for ten minutes as demonstrated by the AFM image on Fig. 3 (right) and a height profile of a few nanometers.
We also tried to increase the Γ value by repeating the electrografting procedure with a renewed DSi[ArNH2] solution and an already modified ITO substrate, after washing and sonication to remove TBAPF6 electrolyte (see above): double, quadruple and sextuple graftings have thus been performed and generally correspond to an increase of Γ from double (Γ2 = 1.4 × 10−10 mol cm−2) to quadruple (Γ4 = 3.5 × 10−10 mol cm−2) and sixfold (Γ6 = 6.2 × 10−10 mol cm−2) grafted surfaces. Typical values of Γ2 range from 1.1 to 2.7 × 10−10 mol cm−2 on about twenty experiments, with a mean value of 1.7. Our results clearly differ from those obtained for molecular wires assembled by stepwise incorporation of metal centers, under either coordination driven processes41,42 or iterative electrosynthesis,43 where the current was shown to increase proportionally or even linearly with the number of steps. This might be ascribed to the lower organization of the POMs in our materials and the amorphous character of the films.
|  | ||
| Fig. 5 FESEM images of DSi[Ar] films electrodeposited onto ITO after mono- (top), double- (middle) and quadruple-grafting (bottom). | ||
A possible explanation for the underestimation of Γ is the low conductivity of the film, owing to the presence of bulky tetrabutylammonium cations, used both as POM charge balancing counter ions and also as electrolyte cations, likely with a low mobility inside the film. This hypothesis is substantiated by a complementary test where TBAPF6 has been replaced by LiBF4. In this experiment, LiBF4 was used as electrolyte in both the double-grafting and post-grafting analysis by cyclic-voltammetry. The Γ value extracted from the cyclic-voltammogram recorded in these conditions was compared to that extracted from the cyclic-votammogram recorded on the same modified substrate but using TBAPF6 as the electrolyte and was found to be four times higher: Γ2,Li = 3.9 × 10−10 mol cm−2 compared to Γ2,TBA = 1.0 × 10−10 mol cm−2. A film porous enough or, as proposed above, better organized to allow the penetration of the electrolyte and cations as small as possible would thus be preferable. Yet, FESEM characterization of the film give images similar to those previously displayed in Fig. 5 for double-grafted films, with no obvious increase in the thickness (see Fig. S13†).
Some of us have previously reported on the formation of monolayers of [PM11O39{XC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4-}]4− (M = Mo, W, X = Ge, Sn) on various substrates, glassy-carbon,26,31,33 graphene,32 gold30 and silicon.19,20 In these studies, the diazonium precursors [PM11O39{XC6H4-C
C-C6H4-}]4− (M = Mo, W, X = Ge, Sn) on various substrates, glassy-carbon,26,31,33 graphene,32 gold30 and silicon.19,20 In these studies, the diazonium precursors [PM11O39{XC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4-N2+}]3− were independently prepared, prior to their redissolution and activation in solution for subsequent (electro)-chemical grafting. This differs from the present work, where the diazonium-terminated POMs have been generated in situ. The formation of a covalently bonded POM monolayer in the previous cases was supported by measurements by ellipsometry when possible (Si and Au), indicating a few nanometer thick layer (2.3 to nm) and consistent with the Γ values (9.2 × 10−11 mol cm−2 onto glassy carbon to 10−10 mol cm−2 onto Si), which were very reproducible. It is well known that diazonium is prone to forming multi-layers24,25,39 and we propose that the stop at the monolayer stage was due to some steric hindrance brought by the POMs.26 Surprisingly, in the present case, starting from (TBA)4[PW11O39{SnC6H4-C
C-C6H4-N2+}]3− were independently prepared, prior to their redissolution and activation in solution for subsequent (electro)-chemical grafting. This differs from the present work, where the diazonium-terminated POMs have been generated in situ. The formation of a covalently bonded POM monolayer in the previous cases was supported by measurements by ellipsometry when possible (Si and Au), indicating a few nanometer thick layer (2.3 to nm) and consistent with the Γ values (9.2 × 10−11 mol cm−2 onto glassy carbon to 10−10 mol cm−2 onto Si), which were very reproducible. It is well known that diazonium is prone to forming multi-layers24,25,39 and we propose that the stop at the monolayer stage was due to some steric hindrance brought by the POMs.26 Surprisingly, in the present case, starting from (TBA)4[PW11O39{SnC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2}] KSn[ArNH2] and generating the diazonium function in situ by the addition of an excess of tBuONO, a higher Γ value was extracted from the CV after mono-grafting onto glassy carbon, up to 1.6 × 10−10 mol cm−2. After mono-grafting onto ITO, the Γ values were lower than those obtained from DSi[ArNH2] (Γ = 1.9–4.1 × 10−11 mol cm−2) but the thickness disclosed on the SEM images, about 10 nm, was definitely higher than that of a monolayer (Fig. S14†). To solve this apparent contradiction and as a control experiment, another grafting onto ITO in every respect similar to the previous one except for the use of pre-isolated (TBA)3[PW11O39{SnC6H4-C
C-C6H4NH2}] KSn[ArNH2] and generating the diazonium function in situ by the addition of an excess of tBuONO, a higher Γ value was extracted from the CV after mono-grafting onto glassy carbon, up to 1.6 × 10−10 mol cm−2. After mono-grafting onto ITO, the Γ values were lower than those obtained from DSi[ArNH2] (Γ = 1.9–4.1 × 10−11 mol cm−2) but the thickness disclosed on the SEM images, about 10 nm, was definitely higher than that of a monolayer (Fig. S14†). To solve this apparent contradiction and as a control experiment, another grafting onto ITO in every respect similar to the previous one except for the use of pre-isolated (TBA)3[PW11O39{SnC6H4-C![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e002.gif) C-C6H4-N2+}] instead of KSn[ArNH2]/tBuONO was carried out. No layer was visible on the SEM image, even if the POM presence was confirmed by cyclic-voltammetry and XPS, indicating that the grafted film was thinner than 5 nm, fully consistent with our previous conclusions. This underscores the great care that should always be taken in setting up the experimental conditions. It indicates that the in situ generation of the diazonium functions is convenient but probably generates more radicals in solution due to the excess of tBuONO and then a loss of control of the grafting process. Yet, it allows for the formation of the targeted thick (in the sense thicker than a monolayer) films.
C-C6H4-N2+}] instead of KSn[ArNH2]/tBuONO was carried out. No layer was visible on the SEM image, even if the POM presence was confirmed by cyclic-voltammetry and XPS, indicating that the grafted film was thinner than 5 nm, fully consistent with our previous conclusions. This underscores the great care that should always be taken in setting up the experimental conditions. It indicates that the in situ generation of the diazonium functions is convenient but probably generates more radicals in solution due to the excess of tBuONO and then a loss of control of the grafting process. Yet, it allows for the formation of the targeted thick (in the sense thicker than a monolayer) films.
![[double bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e001.gif) N–) resulting from the reaction between a diazenyl radical and an outer aromatic ring (or an aryl radical and a diazonium group), so bridging two POM hybrids.44 There is no peak around 403.8 eV that would point to the presence of some diazonium groups.45 This drove us to propose the schematic illustration of the POM-based molecular film in Scheme 2.
N–) resulting from the reaction between a diazenyl radical and an outer aromatic ring (or an aryl radical and a diazonium group), so bridging two POM hybrids.44 There is no peak around 403.8 eV that would point to the presence of some diazonium groups.45 This drove us to propose the schematic illustration of the POM-based molecular film in Scheme 2.
          The SET voltages variations on a given substrate and their variations from one substrate to another are quite important (Fig. S17†). The batch-to-batch performance of devices from the same substrate shows a narrow SET voltage distribution, but the SET voltages of a different substrate could come out quite different, even following the same grafting conditions and the same POM batch. For example, out of the 20 devices on one substrate, 8 devices were successfully turned ON with an average SET potential of 1.105 ± 0.069 V, while for another substrate, 9 devices showed an average SET potential of 1.612 ± 0.163 V. This can probably be ascribed to the poor molecular organization of the POMs inside the film upon the electro-grafting process.
It has also been shown that by applying a constant reading voltage at 0.5 V, there was no significant degradation in the current value of the ON-state device over 104 s (Fig. S18†), indicating that the POM film is electrically robust with a low misreading rate.
The charge trapping attribute has been validated by capacitance–voltage measurements from 0 to −2 V at 0.5 MHz (Fig. 7, middle and right). In brief, the capacitance displayed a steep jump at about −1.2 V to reach a 0.84 nF value that would roughly correspond to a reduction of less than 1 over 10![[thin space (1/6-em)]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_2009.gif) 000 electroactive POMs as estimated from the first electrochemical reduction process (the integration of the first reduction wave corresponds to a charge of 1.26 × 10−5 C, for a substate of 1 cm2 and thus a Γ = 1.3 × 10−10 mol cm−2 value, to be compared to a charge of about 10−9 C for a capacitance value of 0.84 nF at −1.2 V). It is lower than the few percent measured on monolayers of other redox active molecules like ferrocene47 or in organic transistor memories48 (data that are actually rarely given), and tentatively ascribed to the low mobility of the tetrabutylammonium counter ions. It is noteworthy that a detrimental effect of large cations has been reported in POM-based electrochromic materials,49 where the blue color change associated with the reduction of the POMs cannot be observed in the absence of small cations such as lithium or protons,50 sometimes leading to the addition of lithium perchlorate electrolyte in the fabrication process.51 The low mobility of the tetrabutylammonium counter ions could also account for the WORM type behavior/irreversibility. Indeed, the role of the counter ions in the width of the hysteresis loop has been pointed out.52 More generally, the nature of the switching mechanism in molecular junctions based on redox-active molecules is still a wide open question, the stabilization of the injected charges through counterion migration being less easy in the solid state than in solution.53
000 electroactive POMs as estimated from the first electrochemical reduction process (the integration of the first reduction wave corresponds to a charge of 1.26 × 10−5 C, for a substate of 1 cm2 and thus a Γ = 1.3 × 10−10 mol cm−2 value, to be compared to a charge of about 10−9 C for a capacitance value of 0.84 nF at −1.2 V). It is lower than the few percent measured on monolayers of other redox active molecules like ferrocene47 or in organic transistor memories48 (data that are actually rarely given), and tentatively ascribed to the low mobility of the tetrabutylammonium counter ions. It is noteworthy that a detrimental effect of large cations has been reported in POM-based electrochromic materials,49 where the blue color change associated with the reduction of the POMs cannot be observed in the absence of small cations such as lithium or protons,50 sometimes leading to the addition of lithium perchlorate electrolyte in the fabrication process.51 The low mobility of the tetrabutylammonium counter ions could also account for the WORM type behavior/irreversibility. Indeed, the role of the counter ions in the width of the hysteresis loop has been pointed out.52 More generally, the nature of the switching mechanism in molecular junctions based on redox-active molecules is still a wide open question, the stabilization of the injected charges through counterion migration being less easy in the solid state than in solution.53
Both the electrochemical study in the solution phase and the electrical characterization in the solid-state pinpoint a unique feature of polyoxometalates: they are polyanions, with counter-cations that do much more than static balancing of the overall charge.58,59 The shaping process we have chosen involves organic–inorganic POM hybrids that have to be prepared in organic solvents. For solubility reasons, the counter-cations commonly used are thus bulky tetraalkylammonium. Beyond the effect on the structure of the materials, this slows down their migration upon electron transfers to and from the POMs. It is only very recently that the effect of the mobility of ions on the electrical characteristics of molecular tunnel junctions has been addressed.60 Up to now molecular electronics has rather considered redox active molecules neutral. Polyoxometalate chemistry thus provides a unique opportunity to further involve ionic species61 and to harness the influence of counterions to explore possibly emerging properties.
ITO substrates (glass +150 nm ITO, average roughness 3 nm) were purchased from Kintec company (Hong-Kong). The substrates were cleaned by two successive ultrasonicate baths in acetone and ethanol. The surface morphology of the POM films was determined by imaging with a Nanoscope VIII multimode atomic force microscope (AFM) from Bruker equipped with a 150 × 150 × 5 μm scanner. Silicon cantilevers (from Brucker; k = 0.4 N m−1, radius ∼10 nm) were used to acquire AFM images in peak force tapping mode in air at room temperature (1 × 1 μm2 at 1 Hz with a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels). c-AFM measurements were carried out on a Nano-Observer from Scientec. Electrical measurements were acquired through a “resiscope”, a set-up developed by the Génie Electrique et Electronique de Paris to perform SSRM-like measurements over a dynamic range of 1010 Ω. Two types of conductive tips with a Pt/Ir coating both sides were used: 240 AC-PP from μmasch with a stiffness given at 2 N m−1 (v = 70 kHz) and PPP-NCLPt from Nanosensors (for fine measurements), with a stiffness given at 48 N m−1 (v = 190 kHz). In both cases, the tip radius was 20 nm, and the height was 15 μm. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was carried out on a Hitachi SU-70 microscope, with an Oxford X-Max 50 mm 2 detector for energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), at the Institut des Matériaux de Paris Centre. Images and EDS analysis were obtained with an electron beam at a voltage of 5 kV. X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on an Omicron Argus X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. The monochromated AlKα radiation source (hν = 1486.6 eV) had a 280 W electron beam power. The emission of photoelectrons from the sample was analyzed at a takeoff angle of 45° under ultra-high vacuum conditions (≤10−9 mBar). Spectra were carried out with a 100 eV pass energy for the survey scan and 20 eV pass energy for the core level regions. Binding energies were calibrated against the C 1s (C–C) binding energy at 284.8 eV and element peak intensities were corrected by Scofield factors. The spectra were fitted using Casa XPS v.2.3.15 software (Casa Software Ltd, U.K.) and applying a Gaussian/Lorentzian ratio G/L equal to 70/30.
Memory devices were fabricated by thermally evaporating 100 nm thick gold top electrodes onto the POM film through a shadow mask. The resulting devices had an approximate area of 0.25 mm2. The current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of these memory devices were evaluated under ambient conditions in a probe station equipped with the Keysight B1500A semiconductor device parameter analyzer. The capacitances of the devices were also measured by the Keysight (Agilent) LCR meter.
![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/b_char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2}] (KSn[ArNH2]). 
          
            KSn[I] (390 mg, 0.098 mmol), 4-ethynylaniline (30.9 mg, 0.264 mmol, 2.69 equiv.), [PdCl2(PPh3)2] (11.8 mg, 0.017 mmol, 0.17 equiv.) and CuI (3.9 mg, 0.020 mmol, 0.20 equiv.) are added to a dried Schlenk flask under an Ar atmosphere with 5 mL of dried DMF and distilled TEA (270 μL, 1.96 mmol, 20 equiv.). The solution is stirred overnight at ambient temperature and precipitated in ether. After centrifugation, the obtained solid is dissolved in a minimum of acetonitrile with TBABr (300 mg, 0.931 mmol, 9.5 equiv.). The solution is precipitated in ethanol and centrifugated and the slightly brown solid is washed in ethanol and in ether (yield 61%, 236.5 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) 7.68 (d + dd, JH–H = 8.2 Hz, JSn–H = 95.4 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (d + dd, JH–H = 8.2 Hz, JSn–H = 34.2 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, JH–H = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 3.12 (m, 32H), 1.63 (m, 32H, N-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3), δ = 1.39 (sex, J = 7.4 Hz, 32H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 48H). 31P NMR (162 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) −10.98 (s + d, JSn–P = 23.1 Hz). IR (KBr, cm−1): 2960 (m), 2933 (m), 2873 (m), 1483 (m), 1380 (f), 1069 (F), 962 (F), 886 (F), 813 (FF), 515 (f), 380 (m). Anal. Calcd for PW11O39SnC78H154N5 (%): C, 23.67; H, 3.92; N, 1.78 Found: C, 23.52; H, 3.80; N, 1.66. HRMS (ESI−): m/z: 747.06 [M]4− calcd 747.06; 996.41 [M + H]3− calcd 996.41; 1076.84 [M + TBA]3− calcd 1076.84; 1615.76 [M + 2TBA]2− calcd 1615.76.
C-C6H4NH2}] (KSn[ArNH2]). 
          
            KSn[I] (390 mg, 0.098 mmol), 4-ethynylaniline (30.9 mg, 0.264 mmol, 2.69 equiv.), [PdCl2(PPh3)2] (11.8 mg, 0.017 mmol, 0.17 equiv.) and CuI (3.9 mg, 0.020 mmol, 0.20 equiv.) are added to a dried Schlenk flask under an Ar atmosphere with 5 mL of dried DMF and distilled TEA (270 μL, 1.96 mmol, 20 equiv.). The solution is stirred overnight at ambient temperature and precipitated in ether. After centrifugation, the obtained solid is dissolved in a minimum of acetonitrile with TBABr (300 mg, 0.931 mmol, 9.5 equiv.). The solution is precipitated in ethanol and centrifugated and the slightly brown solid is washed in ethanol and in ether (yield 61%, 236.5 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) 7.68 (d + dd, JH–H = 8.2 Hz, JSn–H = 95.4 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (d + dd, JH–H = 8.2 Hz, JSn–H = 34.2 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, JH–H = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 3.12 (m, 32H), 1.63 (m, 32H, N-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3), δ = 1.39 (sex, J = 7.4 Hz, 32H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 48H). 31P NMR (162 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) −10.98 (s + d, JSn–P = 23.1 Hz). IR (KBr, cm−1): 2960 (m), 2933 (m), 2873 (m), 1483 (m), 1380 (f), 1069 (F), 962 (F), 886 (F), 813 (FF), 515 (f), 380 (m). Anal. Calcd for PW11O39SnC78H154N5 (%): C, 23.67; H, 3.92; N, 1.78 Found: C, 23.52; H, 3.80; N, 1.66. HRMS (ESI−): m/z: 747.06 [M]4− calcd 747.06; 996.41 [M + H]3− calcd 996.41; 1076.84 [M + TBA]3− calcd 1076.84; 1615.76 [M + 2TBA]2− calcd 1615.76.
        ![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/b_char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2)2O}] KSi[ArNH2]. 
          
            KSi[I] (100 mg, 0.026 mmol), 4-ethynylaniline (19 mg, 0.16 mmol, 6 equiv.) [PdCl2(PPh3)2] (2.3 mg, 0.0033 mmol, 0.1 equiv.) and CuI (1 mg, 0.053 mmol, 0.2equiv.) were added to a dried Schlenk flask under an Ar atmosphere with 2 mL of dried DMF and distilled TEA (100 μL, 0.70 mmol, 27 equiv.). The solution was stirred overnight at ambient temperature and precipitated in diethyl ether. After centrifugation, the obtained solid was dissolved in a minimum of acetonitrile with TBABr (100 mg, 0.31 mmol, 11.9 equiv.). The solution was precipitated with absolute ethanol and centrifuged, and the recovered solid was washed with ethanol and ether. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) 7.82 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.55 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 4.47 (s, 4H), 3.09 (m, 24H), 1.61 (m, 24H), 1.37 (sex, J = 7.3 Hz, 24H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 36H). 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, CD3CN, ppm): δ (ppm) −12.83 (s, 1P). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3457 (s), 3384 (s), 2961 (s), 2933 (m), 2874 (m), 2206 (w), 1624 (s), 1594 (s), 1519 (s), 1480 (m), 1383 (w), 1109 (s), 1066 (m), 1038 (s), 965 (vs), 873 (vs), 823 (vs), 767 (m), 712 (m), 590 (m), 523 (m). Anal. Cald (%): C, 23.64; H, 3.34; N, 1.81 Found: C, 23.64; H, 3.07; N, 1.70. HRMS (ESI−): m/z: 1044.45 [M]3− calcd 1044.45; 1688.81 [M + TBA]2− calcd 1688.82.
C-C6H4NH2)2O}] KSi[ArNH2]. 
          
            KSi[I] (100 mg, 0.026 mmol), 4-ethynylaniline (19 mg, 0.16 mmol, 6 equiv.) [PdCl2(PPh3)2] (2.3 mg, 0.0033 mmol, 0.1 equiv.) and CuI (1 mg, 0.053 mmol, 0.2equiv.) were added to a dried Schlenk flask under an Ar atmosphere with 2 mL of dried DMF and distilled TEA (100 μL, 0.70 mmol, 27 equiv.). The solution was stirred overnight at ambient temperature and precipitated in diethyl ether. After centrifugation, the obtained solid was dissolved in a minimum of acetonitrile with TBABr (100 mg, 0.31 mmol, 11.9 equiv.). The solution was precipitated with absolute ethanol and centrifuged, and the recovered solid was washed with ethanol and ether. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) 7.82 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.55 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 4.47 (s, 4H), 3.09 (m, 24H), 1.61 (m, 24H), 1.37 (sex, J = 7.3 Hz, 24H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 36H). 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, CD3CN, ppm): δ (ppm) −12.83 (s, 1P). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3457 (s), 3384 (s), 2961 (s), 2933 (m), 2874 (m), 2206 (w), 1624 (s), 1594 (s), 1519 (s), 1480 (m), 1383 (w), 1109 (s), 1066 (m), 1038 (s), 965 (vs), 873 (vs), 823 (vs), 767 (m), 712 (m), 590 (m), 523 (m). Anal. Cald (%): C, 23.64; H, 3.34; N, 1.81 Found: C, 23.64; H, 3.07; N, 1.70. HRMS (ESI−): m/z: 1044.45 [M]3− calcd 1044.45; 1688.81 [M + TBA]2− calcd 1688.82.
        ![[triple bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/b_char_e002.gif) C-C6H4NH2)2O}] DSi[ArNH2]. 
          
            DSi[I] (100 mg, 0.016 mmol), 4-ethynylaniline (10 mg, 0.085 mmol, 5 eq.) [PdCl2(PPh3)2] (1.1 mg, 0.0016 mmol, 0.10 eq.) and CuI (0.5 mg, 0.0026 mmol, 0.15 eq.) were added to a dried Schlenk flask under an Ar atmosphere with 2 mL anhydrous DMF and distilled TEA (100 μL, 0.70 mmol, 44 eq.). The solution was stirred overnight at ambient temperature and precipitated in diethyl ether. After centrifugation, the solid obtained was dissolved in minimum acetonitrile with TBABr (100 mg, 0.31 mmol, 19.4 eq.). The solution was precipitated with absolute ethanol and centrifuged, and the recovered solid was washed with ethanol and ether (yield 76.2%, 76 mg). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) 7.82 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 4.44 (s, 4H), 3.14 (m, 48H), 1.63 (m, 48H), 1.40 (sex, J = 7.3 Hz, 48H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 72H). 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) −10.13 (s, 1P), −13.14 (s, 1P). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3463 (s), 3364 (s), 3224 (m), 2962 (s), 2934 (s), 2873 (s), 2205 (w), 1626 (s), 1593 (m), 1519 (m), 1484 (s), 1380 (w), 1089 (vs), 1039 (s), 955 (vs), 915 (vs), 810 (vs), 766 (s), 602 (m), 528 (m). Anal. Cald (%) for 6 TBA+: C, 24.52; H, 3.92; N, 1.84. Anal. Cald (%) for 5.75 TBA+ and 0.25 H+: C, 23.96; H, 3.81; N, 1.80 Found C, 23.94; H, 3.51; N, 1.69. HRMS (ESI−): m/z: 924.18 [M + H]5− calcd 924.19; 972.43 [M + TBA]5− calcd 972.44; 1276.11 [M + 2TBA]4− calcd 1276.12; 1539.62 [M + 3H]3− calcd 1539.65; 1782.58 [M + 3TBA]3− calcd 1782.59.
C-C6H4NH2)2O}] DSi[ArNH2]. 
          
            DSi[I] (100 mg, 0.016 mmol), 4-ethynylaniline (10 mg, 0.085 mmol, 5 eq.) [PdCl2(PPh3)2] (1.1 mg, 0.0016 mmol, 0.10 eq.) and CuI (0.5 mg, 0.0026 mmol, 0.15 eq.) were added to a dried Schlenk flask under an Ar atmosphere with 2 mL anhydrous DMF and distilled TEA (100 μL, 0.70 mmol, 44 eq.). The solution was stirred overnight at ambient temperature and precipitated in diethyl ether. After centrifugation, the solid obtained was dissolved in minimum acetonitrile with TBABr (100 mg, 0.31 mmol, 19.4 eq.). The solution was precipitated with absolute ethanol and centrifuged, and the recovered solid was washed with ethanol and ether (yield 76.2%, 76 mg). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) 7.82 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 4.44 (s, 4H), 3.14 (m, 48H), 1.63 (m, 48H), 1.40 (sex, J = 7.3 Hz, 48H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 72H). 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, CD3CN): δ (ppm) −10.13 (s, 1P), −13.14 (s, 1P). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3463 (s), 3364 (s), 3224 (m), 2962 (s), 2934 (s), 2873 (s), 2205 (w), 1626 (s), 1593 (m), 1519 (m), 1484 (s), 1380 (w), 1089 (vs), 1039 (s), 955 (vs), 915 (vs), 810 (vs), 766 (s), 602 (m), 528 (m). Anal. Cald (%) for 6 TBA+: C, 24.52; H, 3.92; N, 1.84. Anal. Cald (%) for 5.75 TBA+ and 0.25 H+: C, 23.96; H, 3.81; N, 1.80 Found C, 23.94; H, 3.51; N, 1.69. HRMS (ESI−): m/z: 924.18 [M + H]5− calcd 924.19; 972.43 [M + TBA]5− calcd 972.44; 1276.11 [M + 2TBA]4− calcd 1276.12; 1539.62 [M + 3H]3− calcd 1539.65; 1782.58 [M + 3TBA]3− calcd 1782.59.
        | Footnote | 
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Molecular structure characterization: 1H, 31P NMR spectra, isotopic peaks in mass spectrometry; cyclic voltammograms; surface characterization: AFM, C-AFM and FESEM images, XPS spectra; memory tests I/V characteristics. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3qi01761c | 
| This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2024 |