Changyu
Si‡
a,
Fubin
Liu‡
a,
Yu
Peng
a,
Yating
Qiao
a,
Peng
Wang
a,
Xixuan
Wang
a,
Jianxiao
Gong
a,
Huijun
Zhou
a,
Ming
Zhang
*b and
Fangfang
Song
*a
aDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China. E-mail: songfangfang@tmu.edu.cn
bComprehensive Management Department of Occupational Health, Shenzhen Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Shenzhen, 518020, China. E-mail: mingle1981@163.com
First published on 18th January 2024
Background: advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), formed through a series of non-enzymatic reactions, can promote inflammation and oxidative stress. Their accumulation in the body has been linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. However, the association of total AGEs and AGEs from different food sources with risks of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality is still unknown. Methods: we conducted a prospective cohort study of a nationally representative sample of 22124 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988–1994) and NHANES 2003–2006. A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was utilized to calculate total and different food-derived AGE intake. Associations between various dietary AGE scores and the risk of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality were assessed by weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: over a median follow-up period of 27.1 years, we found that in the general population, AGE scores of both baked foods and meat were risk factors for all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. Specially, higher AGE scores in total and those derived from 10 of the 13 food groups were statistically associated with an increased risk of CVD mortality. Egg-, fruit-, and vegetable-derived AGE scores were positively correlated with the risk of cancer mortality. Additionally, there were positive multiplicative and additive interactions between smoking and meat-derived AGE scores on all-cause mortality. Conclusions: high amounts of AGE consumption is associated with an increased risk of CVD mortality, and meat and baked food-derived AGEs were positively linked to all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortalities. Adherence to unhealthy lifestyles, such as smoking, may increase mortality from leading causes in individuals with AGE-enriched diet habits.
There are two main sources of human exposure to AGEs: exogenous AGEs from food and endogenous AGEs originating from irreversible non-enzymatic reactions of reducing sugars or reactive dicarbonyls with free amino groups,6 with the former contributing more to the human AGE pool7 and being directly related to AGE levels in circulation.8 Moreover, the dietary intake of AGEs may act as a modifiable risk factor and a potential target of future intervention for aforementioned chronic diseases. However, most of the current evidence on the relationship between dietary AGEs and mortality is limited to cancer populations,9,10 with only one Japanese study reporting an association between AGE intake and the risk of mortality in the general population.11 Notably, the content of AGEs in various foods is not the same, depending mainly on their nutritional component and cooking methods. In particular, foods rich in fat and protein can propagate and accelerate the formation of new AGEs at high temperatures.12 However, research and evidence regarding the associations of AGEs from different food sources with risks of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality is limited.
We hypothesized that a high intake of AGEs was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to prospectively examine the associations of dietary AGEs in total and from different food sources with risk of mortality in a nationally representative cohort, thereby providing dietary guidance and developing disease prevention strategies.
Our study used data from different periods of NHANES including NHANES III (1988–1994), and NHANES 2003–2004 and 2005–2006, as only the participants during these periods were given the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to obtain the frequency data of food consumption. In this analysis, participants with missing interview or examination status (n = 2765) and missing follow-up (n = 9390) data from baseline and pregnant women (n = 871) were excluded. After further exclusion of those who had missing food frequency questionnaire sample weight (n = 3354), extreme total energy intake exceeding the 500–5000 kcal range (n = 1659), and extreme total AGE intake exceeding a range of weighted mean ± three standard deviations (3SD) (n = 177), we brought 22124 subjects in the study (ESI Fig. 1†).
The distribution of AGE scores in total and from different food groups is illustrated in Fig. 1B and ESI Table 1.† Due to their non-normal distribution, all scores were naturally log-transformed and standardized when considered as continuous variables. We compared the baseline demographics and nutritional characteristics of participants between quartiles of total AGE scores, using Rao–Scott chi-square test for categorical variables and sampling-weighted analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. In addition, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by performing sampling-weighted Cox proportional hazard models to examine associations of AGE scores in total and derived from different food groups as continuous and categorical variables (in quartiles), respectively, with risks of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality after the adjustment for covariates based on a directed acyclic graph (ESI Fig. 2†), the following covariates were included in the final model: age, gender, race, education, marital status, PIR, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol intake, cancer, and energy intake. The proportional hazards assumption was tested by the Schoenfeld residual method and held.
Secondary analyses were performed. First, after the food AGE dichotomy, population attributable risk (PAR) was used to estimate the contribution of overall and various food-derived AGE scores to all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality to select primarily contributory food groups. Second, we performed subgroup analyses to examine the associations across strata of traditional risk factors including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking, and physical activity for the AGE score in total and from primarily contributory food groups. Third, additive interaction was evaluated using the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) index and multiplicative interaction analyses were performed for AGE scores on the above-selected food groups and lifestyle factors.
Characteristics | Quartiles of total AGE scores | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 (0–12.67) | Q2 (12.67–24,34) | Q3 (24.34–39.21) | Q4 (39.21–114.61) | P-value | |
n = 2783 | n = 4749 | n = 6560 | n = 8032 | ||
Data were expressed as weighted mean ± SD for continuous variables or weighted % for categorical variables. Differential analyses were carried out by using sampling-weighted analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Abbreviation: AGEs, advanced glycation end products; BMI, body mass index; PIR, poverty income ratio; SD, standard deviation. | |||||
Age (years), mean ± SD | 43.30 ± 0.47 | 45.12 ± 0.50 | 46.13 ± 0.52 | 47.87 ± 0.62 | <0.0001 |
Gender, % | 0.0304 | ||||
Male | 44.52 | 45.17 | 45.05 | 50.39 | |
Female | 55.48 | 54.83 | 54.95 | 49.61 | |
Race/ethnicity, % | <0.0001 | ||||
Non-hispanic white | 65.36 | 74.43 | 76.64 | 78.40 | |
Non-hispanic black | 13.92 | 10.44 | 9.64 | 10.99 | |
Mexican American | 10.18 | 7.97 | 5.98 | 4.31 | |
Others | 10.54 | 7.16 | 7.74 | 6.30 | |
Education, % | <0.0001 | ||||
Below high school | 17.40 | 16.14 | 17.75 | 20.82 | |
High school | 29.40 | 30.59 | 38.84 | 39.75 | |
College or above | 53.20 | 53.27 | 43.41 | 39.43 | |
Marital status, % | 0.0109 | ||||
Married/living with partner | 59.32 | 62.37 | 64.59 | 65.63 | |
Divorced/separated/widowed | 19.33 | 18.60 | 18.12 | 17.81 | |
Never married | 21.35 | 19.03 | 17.29 | 16.56 | |
Poverty income ratio, % | 0.0072 | ||||
0–1.30 | 17.74 | 18.29 | 16.58 | 20.26 | |
1.31–3.50 | 38.75 | 37.06 | 40.01 | 39.91 | |
3.51∼ | 43.51 | 44.65 | 43.41 | 39.83 | |
Body mass index (kg m −2 ), % | <0.0001 | ||||
<25 | 33.28 | 36.92 | 39.19 | 42.34 | |
25–30 | 31.44 | 33.71 | 32.60 | 31.24 | |
>30 | 35.28 | 29.37 | 28.21 | 26.42 | |
Physical activity, % | <0.0001 | ||||
Vigorous | 34.42 | 36.87 | 33.98 | 34.52 | |
Moderate | 33.30 | 36.27 | 40.36 | 40.86 | |
Inactive | 32.28 | 26.86 | 25.66 | 24.62 | |
Smoking status, % | 0.0028 | ||||
Non-smoker | 48.85 | 49.46 | 50.18 | 47.93 | |
Current smoker | 27.95 | 24.49 | 24.59 | 23.46 | |
Former smoker | 23.20 | 26.05 | 25.23 | 28.61 | |
Alcohol intake, % | 0.0008 | ||||
No drinking | 72.84 | 73.74 | 75.47 | 77.56 | |
Moderate drinking | 8.75 | 8.99 | 9.18 | 9.88 | |
Heavy drinking | 18.41 | 17.27 | 15.35 | 12.56 | |
Cancer history, % | 0.0184 | ||||
Yes | 7.13 | 7.76 | 9.00 | 9.82 | |
No | 92.87 | 92.24 | 91.00 | 90.18 | |
Energy (kcal per day), mean ± SD | 2098.49 ± 25.02 | 2160.18 ± 27.45 | 2130.90 ± 23.02 | 2153.03 ± 24.84 | 0.2636 |
Consequently, to pick out the food groups with the primary attribution to mortality risk, we used PAR analysis after dichotomizing lifestyle factors. Of the 13 food groups, meat, baked foods, and potatoes were considered to be the food sources of AGE score that had a major contribution to mortality, with higher PAR values (Table 2 and ESI Table 3†). The PAR of all-cause mortality increased from 2.4% when exposed to the Q4 level alone to 10.9% when exposed to a combination of Q2, Q3, and Q4 levels for the meat-derived AGE score, from 8.0% to 14.2% for baked food-derived AGE score, and from 2.0% to 13.6% for the potato-derived AGE score. For CVD mortality, the PAR for meat-, baked foods- and potato-derived AGE scores increased from 2.8% to 46.3%, 15.6% to 49.4%, and 2.2% to 42.3%, respectively. The PAR for cancer mortality also showed substantially similar results, with values increasing from 4.8% to 26.5% for meat sources, 15.2% to 29.7% for baked food sources, and 1.7% to 24.9% for potato sources. In a nutshell, as the incremental combination of AGE levels, the proportion of mortality attributable to it increased. The PAR analysis results for all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortalities by the other food groups, which were not included in subsequent analyses due to their low or negative PAR values (ESI Table 3†).
Food group sources | N | PAR (%, 95% confidence interval) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All-cause mortality | CVD mortality | Cancer mortality | ||
The model was adjusted for age (<65, ≥65), gender (female, male), race (white, others), education (below high school, others), poverty income ratio (0–1.3, >1.3), body mass index (<30, ≥30 kg m−2), physical activity (vigorous or moderate, inactive), smoking status (yes, no), drinking status (yes, no), marital status (never, others), energy (low, high) and cancer (yes, no). Abbreviations: AGEs, advanced glycation end products; PAR, population attributable risk; CVD, cardiovascular disease. | ||||
Meat and meat products | ||||
≥Q4 | 8734 | 2.4 (0.6, 4.2) | 2.8 (0.2, 5.9) | 4.8 (0.7, 8.9) |
≥Q3 | 15![]() |
6.1 (2.5, 9.7) | 20.2 (14.3, 25.9) | 12.0 (3.9, 20.0) |
≥Q2 | 19![]() |
10.9 (3.9, 17.8) | 46.3 (36.6, 55.0) | 26.5 (11.3, 40.5) |
Baked foods | ||||
≥Q4 | 10![]() |
8.0 (5.7, 10.4) | 15.6 (11.5, 19.6) | 15.2 (10.0, 20.2) |
≥Q3 | 16![]() |
12.9 (8.7, 17.2) | 33.2 (26.4, 39.6) | 21.8 (12.7, 30.6) |
≥Q2 | 19![]() |
14.2 (6.6, 21.7) | 49.4 (38.6, 58.8) | 29.7 (13.6, 44.2) |
Potatoes and their products | ||||
≥Q4 | 4850 | 2.0 (0.8, 3.3) | 2.2 (0.1, 4.4) | 1.7 (0.1, 4.0) |
≥Q3 | 12![]() |
3.4 (0.8, 6.1) | 9.3 (4.7, 13.8) | 6.6 (0.7, 12.4) |
≥Q2 | 19![]() |
13.6 (7.0, 20.2) | 42.3 (32.5, 51.1) | 24.9 (10.9, 38.0) |
Further subgroup analyses were carried out based on traditional risk factors. A higher total AGE score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the age ≥ 60, CVD mortality in all subgroups except the age < 60, and drinkers (all Ptrend values < 0.05; ESI Table 4†). Compared with the Q1 level, the Q4 level of meat-derived AGE score was positively associated with risk of all-cause mortality among smokers and non-drinkers, CVD mortality in all subgroups except the age < 60 and physically inactive participants, and cancer mortality in non-drinkers and physically active participants (Ptrend < 0.05; ESI Table 5†). With regard to AGE score from baked foods, the risk of all-cause mortality increased in the age ≥ 60, female, non-drinkers, and physically inactive participants, CVD mortality in all subgroups except the age < 60, drinkers, and cancer mortality among smokers (Ptrend < 0.05; ESI Table 6†). For potato-derived AGE score, the increased risk was observed in the age ≥ 60, female and non-drinkers for all-cause mortality and CVD mortality, and in physically active participants for CVD mortality. (Ptrend < 0.05; ESI Table 7†).
We further performed additive interaction analysis with more biological significance after adjusting for covariates. As shown in ESI Table 9,† physical inactivity and meat-derived AGE score had an additive interaction on all-cause mortality (RERI = −0.150, P = 0.0312). Besides, there were positive additive interactions between smoking and meat-derived AGE scores on all-cause mortality (RERI = 0.152, P = 0.0107) and cancer mortality (RERI = 0.364, P = 0.0159), as well as between smoking and baked food-derived AGE score on cancer mortality (RERI = 0.465, P = 0.0032).
With the rapid development of social economy and accelerated pace of life, people tend to buy fast food or convenience food with high energy content but low nutritional value,21 so that food consumption and dietary patterns have undergone striking changes, shifting from traditional diets high in grains and fiber to more westernized diets, such as excessive absorption of refined carbohydrates and immoderate consumption of red or processed meats.22 Currently, the modern diet as the predominant source of AGEs and produces a significant increase in the body's AGEs pool is now well documented.23,24 Earlier studies have explored the association between total AGE intake and the risks of CVD and cancer mortality in cancer patients. For example, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study referred to a published database that estimated a single CML-AGEs content using ELISA12 to assess AGEs intake and reported more post-diagnosis dietary CML intake increased the risk of mortality in breast cancer patients with a longer follow-up time of about 15.1 years.10 Findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study suggested a null association between pre-diagnosis dietary AGEs intake assessed by a combination of CML, CEL, and MG-H1 using a database based on a validated UPLC-MS method13 and all-cause mortality in colorectal cancer patients with a follow-up time of only 5.67 years.9 However, the effects of AGEs on a healthy population tend to be different from those with pre-existing conditions. The Takayama Study focused on the general population in Japan, based on an UPLC-MS method,13 and did not support a positive relationship between dietary CML intake with mortality in the general population after 14.1 years of follow-up.11 Specifically, the Japanese study observed a negative association between CML intake and all-cause, non-cancer, non-CVD mortality in males, possibly due to the protective effects of CML intake from nuts/pulses against mortality in males according to subgroup analysis by food sources. However, in the present study, subgroup analysis stratified by sex revealed that total AGE score was not associated with all-cause mortality in both sexes, but AGE scores from total, meats and baked foods increased the risk of CVD mortality in both males and females, and the potato-derived AGE score could also increase the risk of CVD mortality in females. Of note, we herein assessed the intake of combined AGEs containing CML, CEL, and MG-H1 by utilizing the UPLC-MS method in the Western population, whose cooking methods and the amount and duration of heat exposure resulting in the formation of AGEs may differ from the Japanese population, which could be the reason for the inconsistent findings. More research is warranted to clarify the association of the intake of dietary AGEs with the risk of mortality.
Several subgroup differences were found, highlighting the positive association of AGE score with CVD mortality risk in physically active people and smokers. In addition, we obtained a better handle on smoking, considered a poor lifestyle, and meat-derived AGE score had positive multiplicative and synergy additive interactions on all-cause mortality. Smoking cessation might have an active influence on CVD by reducing the concentration of AGEs.25,26 Therefore, taking well-directed intervention measures, such as giving up smoking may be helpful to avert adverse outcomes.
In addition, considering the different combined AGE values of various food items, we consequently utilized dietary questionnaires from the NHANES database to calculate the total AGEs and different food-derived AGE scores and selected three food groups primarily contributing to mortality from main causes through PAR analysis. To date, the evidence on the relationship between AGE scores derived from diverse food and mortality was scarce; moreover, the Japanese study suggested that the effects of CML on mortality might vary according to food sources. Herein, we observed that meat-derived AGE score would augment risks of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortalities, consistent with the findings of a study suggesting that meat intake (non-seafood) was associated with an increased risk of mortality among U.S. adults.27 High consumption of cereal and potato products, especially those with high levels of refined carbohydrates and ultra-processed foods, was also associated with increased CVD mortality.28 As in our study, considering the baked foods, CVD mortality risk increased 1.13-fold in the highest quartile of the AGE score. It was worth noting that the uptake of seafood-derived AGEs was detrimental to CVD mortality, which may be due to the fact that not only fresh seafood, but also seafood cooked in different ways (such as fried or smoked fish) were involved in our food group. Likewise, although many studies have indicated that eating fatty or oily fish was strongly related to reduced mortality from CVD, it is surprising to see that evidence did not show such an assumption for fried fish or fish sandwiches, especially those commercially fried in unhealthy oils, which are often low in omega-3.29 As for egg products, in high-temperature baking such as fried eggs, the egg liquid would provide enough protein and free amino acids, and when the amino group was supplemented in large quantities, the Maillard reaction will dominate.30 These results reinforced the fact that the accumulation of AGEs due to the systematic heating and processing of foods was associated with the adverse health effects related to the diet, so the generation of AGEs in food should be avoided, and consumers can be educated on cooking methods produced by low AGEs, such as poaching, steaming, stewing, and boiling.12,31
The major extraordinary edge in this study included that, to our knowledge, this was the first longitudinal study to systematically explore the association of AGE score in total and from different food groups with risks of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. This added to the growing body of evidence examining the relationship between dietary intake of AGEs and mortality in the general population. Besides, we used a validated food database based on the UPLC-MS methodology to more accurately assess the exposure levels of AGEs containing three main compounds, i.e., CML, CEL, and MG. Nonetheless, our study also has some boundaries that must be well thought out. First, this study may have recall bias due to the self-reported dietary questionnaires by participants, which may lead to misclassification of exposure. Secondly, since the food items in FFQ of NHANES III and NHANES 2003–2006 were not completely consistent, the intersection of food items in the two datasets was utilized, which may make the AGE score estimation not strictly accurate. Thirdly, due to the mixing of food items in NHANES FFQ, our classification of food was not completely precise. For instance, we did not distinguish between red meat and white meat, but both were categorized as meat products, which may have a misclassification bias when assessing the effects of AGEs on mortality. Fourthly, we cannot rule out biases due to unmeasured confounding factors, such as the possibility that participants who ate more meat and potatoes consumed less fruits. Fifthly, the levels of AGEs also rest with cooking methods, temperature, and time, which can lead to deviations in the measurement of intake of AGEs. Finally, the potentially toxic by-products of the Maillard reaction, such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, acrylamide, or heterocyclic aromatic amines, may have potentially additive or synergistic negative health effects on diet AGEs, whereas, we obtained no available information about these information in NHANES.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fo03945e |
‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |