Yi-Fang
Lai
a,
Lydie
Leung
a,
Matthew J.
Timm
b,
Gilbert C.
Walker
a and
John C.
Polanyi
*a
aLash Miller Chemical Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada. E-mail: john.polanyi@utoronto.ca
bDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 28, 8010 Graz, Austria
First published on 25th January 2024
Electron-induced dissociation of a fluorocarbon adsorbate CF3 (ad) at 4.6 K is shown by Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy (STM) to form directed energetic F-atom ‘projectiles’ on Cu(110). The outcome of a collision between these directed projectiles and stationary co-adsorbed allyl ‘target’ molecules was found through STM to give rotational excitation of the target allyl, clockwise or anti-clockwise, depending on the chosen collision geometry. Molecular dynamics computation linked the collisional excitation of the allyl target to an ‘abortive chemical reaction’, in which the approach of the F-projectile stretched an H–C bond lifting the allyl above the surface, facilitating isomerization from ‘Across’ to ‘Along’ a Cu row.
Here we report an STM study of collisions of an energetic F-atom projectile with a stationary allyl target on Cu(110), at impact parameters in the region of 1–2 Å. Almost half of these collisions led to rotation of the allyl from ‘Across’ to ‘Along’ a Cu row. Molecular dynamics calculations gave evidence of an abortive H-atom abstraction reaction as the cause of the observed efficient rotational isomerization of the allyl.
The F-atom projectile was produced from the electron-induced dissociation of CF3. The STM tip was placed over the CF3 radical with the feedback loop off. The current was recorded as a function of time at a constant bias of +1.4 V. A subsequent STM image showed the position of the products after the collision between the F-atom projectile and the allyl Across. The positions of the products following collision were obtained using the WSxM software.20
An Impulsive Two-State (I2S) model, described in detail elsewhere,12,13,31–33 was used to model the formation of the F-atom projectile. In the I2S model, the system is promoted from equilibrium on the ground state to a repulsive upper state by transferring an electron from the F-atom core to its valence shell, so as to reproduce the effect of added charge. Molecular dynamics (MD) were calculated for the excited system for a time, t*. Once the system was returned to the ground state, with the velocities and atomic positions obtained from the excited state, the dynamics were followed until a final state was reached. For the abortive reaction, the maximum allyl rotation was calculated with t* = 7.5 fs. For the abstraction reaction, the t* was set at 8.0 fs which was the minimum time needed to obtain the reaction products, HF and allyl radical. The MD calculations were performed using a time-step of 0.5 fs, under microcanonical conditions.
In Fig. 1a, the initial state shows an STM image recorded at 4.6 K of CF3 and allyl Across, adsorbed as nearest neighbours. The allyl is located between Cu-rows 1 and 2, and the CF3 is found adsorbed on Cu-row 2 (vertical dashed line). The CF3 was found preferentially on the inside of the curved allyl Across, as shown in the calculated geometry. The CF3 is located on the right-hand side of the allyl centre-of-mass, near the allyl C atom denoted as 3. Localized ‘streaks’ observed between the curved side of the allyl and the CF3 are indicative of long-range interactions between the F-atom and the neighbouring allyl. The final state shown in Fig. 1a, was obtained by injecting 1.4 eV electrons from the STM tip into the CF3 radical, at the location of the white cross. This led to electron-induced dissociation of a C–F bond, generating an F-atom projectile and a CF2 at the surface as indicated in the figure.15–19
The final state comprised an allyl Along and a CF2 adsorbed on the same Cu-row 2, and an F-atom located on the adjacent Cu-row 1. The final position of the F-atom projectile indicated that the broken C–F bond was the one nearest to the allyl Across in the initial state, since the products of the electron-induced dissociation recoil along the bond direction.35 The collision between the F-atom and the allyl Across occurred at a negative impact parameter, with the recoiling F travelling towards C-atom 1 of allyl Across (to the left of the allyl centre-of-mass – see calculated geometries in Fig. 1a). This collision resulted in a clockwise rotation of allyl from Across to Along. The calculated geometries in the simulations are in good agreement with observation, confirming the given assignment of the reagents and products.
The initial state in Fig. 1b consists of an allyl Across located between Cu-rows 2 and 3, and a neighbouring CF3 found on Cu-row 2 (vertical dashed line). In this case the collision between the F-atom and the allyl Across occurred at a positive impact parameter, with the F-atom travelling towards C-atom 3 of allyl Across, resulting in an anti-clockwise rotation of the allyl. The final state STM image shows the allyl Along and the CF2 radical adsorbed on the same Cu-row 2, and the F-atom on Cu-row 3 adjacent to the allyl. The initial and final states in Fig. 1b are essentially mirror-images of those in Fig. 1a.
In addition to rotation, translation of the allyl Along was observed by one or two unit-cells in the [10] direction, attributable in either case to attractive interactions between the allyl and the CF2 radical. The allyl rotation was observed for ∼41% of collisions between the F-atom and the allyl. The balance of the cases gave no rotation; Ntotal = 114 cases.
Molecular dynamics calculations were performed for the rotational energy-transfer between the F-atom projectile and the allyl Across (for which the initial state was shown in Fig. 1a). The impulsive two-state model employed to describe the electronic excitation of the CF3 resulted in a recoil of atomic F. The trajectories of the F-atom projectile and the terminal H-atom of allyl, are shown in Fig. 2a, with visualizations of the initial, transition and final states. The F-atom recoiled from CF3 with 0.82 eV, gained after the system had resided in the excited state for t* = 7.5 fs, which is the maximum t* for an abortive (failed) reaction.
On the neutral ground state, the F-atom projectile approached the allyl Across at an impact parameter of −1.3 Å and an angle of 65° from the [10] direction. As the F-atom travelled towards the allyl, at 81 fs the C–H bond extended by 0.26 Å (∼23%) due to the F-atom attracting the H-atom. Subsequently, the C–H bond returned to its original length, with energy released. The released energy was transferred to internal states of the allyl causing the H-atom to accelerate along the [10] direction. At 300 fs, the allyl target was computed to rotate 36.5°, about 1/3 of the experimentally observed rotation.
Fig. 2b shows dynamical details of the 3D trajectory for the same H-atom of allyl Across shown in Fig. 2a. The C–H bond-stretch induced by the F-atom projectile at 81 fs resulted in lifting of the allyl above the surface, freeing it to rotate and reach its maximum height at 167 fs. Simultaneously the allyl rotated in a clockwise direction, with the carbon atom furthest away from the collision acting as pivot. The allyl then travelled towards the Cu surface and bounced a second time at 211 fs.
Fig. 3 shows the same dynamics as Fig. 2, diagrammatically at successive times. Initially at t = 0 fs, the electron-induced dissociation of CF3 was obtained by adding an electronic-charge to the F-atom of CF3 adjacent to the allyl Across, as indicated by the ‘explosion’ in the C–F bond. At t = 81 fs, the I2S model shows the F-atom recoiling along the direction of the breaking C–F bond in CF3. This F-atom projectile approached and interacted with the H, inside the curve of the allyl Across to form a transition state F–H–C. At 94 fs, the C–H was vibrationally excited, as evidenced by the C–H bond-stretch. Rotational momentum was gained as the allyl bounced from the surface; by 300 fs the allyl had rotated 36.5° clockwise.
Fig. 3 Molecular dynamics for clockwise rotation in the collision between an F-projectile and allyl across target, at a negative impact parameter b = − 1.3 Å. (a) The initial state (t = 0 fs) corresponds to that in Fig. 1a. The explosion marks the C–F bond-excitation to anti-bond. The F-projectile is highlighted in red. (b) Formation of the transition state indicated by black dashed lines, linking F–H and H–allyl. (c) Vibrationally excited H–allyl resulting from the collision between F-projectile and H–allyl. (d) Computed clockwise-rotated position of the allyl at 300 fs. |
The final state for anti-clockwise rotation observed in Fig. 1b was the result of a collision with the F-projectile at a positive impact parameter of +1.3 Å. The molecular dynamics were a mirror image of Fig. 3, with the F-atom colliding at the right-end carbon of the allyl. This resulted in a maximum rotation of ∼36.5° anti-clockwise.
The observed rotational excitation of the allyl is a consequence of the C–H bond stretch. This C–H bond stretch occurs en route to an abstraction reaction in which the F-atom projectile would abstract the terminal H-atom of allyl. This abstraction reaction was not observed, since it is calculated to be endoergic by ∼1 eV. Fig. 4 shows the computed abstraction of the terminal H-atom of allyl for an F-atom projectile with an enhanced kinetic energy of 0.88 eV. The enhanced F-atom kinetic energy enabled abstraction of the H-atom to form HF. The abortive reaction (Fig. 2 and 3) excited the C–H bond stretch, leading, in multiple encounters between the allyl and the surface, to rotation of the allyl from Across to Along.
Fig. 4 Computed molecular dynamics at an enhanced kinetic energy between the F-projectile and its allyl Across target, at b = −1.3 Å, leading to abstraction reaction. The initial state (t = 0 fs) corresponds to the initial state in Fig. 1a. The explosion in the anti-bond due to electronic excitation, marks the C–F bond being broken. The F-projectile is highlighted in red in the IS, TS and FS. The transition state F–H–C is indicated by dashed lines joining F–H and H–C. The HF product is highlighted at 300 fs, showing the reaction products, HF + allyl, at enhanced kinetic energy. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |