Alice Jane
McEllin
,
Christopher A.
Goult
,
Adrian C.
Whitwood
,
Jason M.
Lynam
and
Duncan W.
Bruce
*
Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, YORK YO10 5DD, UK. E-mail: duncan.bruce@york.ac.uk
First published on 17th April 2024
Correction for ‘On the mercuration, palladation, transmetalation and direct auration of a C^N^C pincer ligand’ by Alice Jane McEllin et al., Dalton Trans., 2023, 52, 872–876, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2dt04114f.
This resonance is complex when compared to the simple and expected AX2 doublet and triplet seen in the related chlorogold(III) complexes (original manuscript Fig. 3(c)). We incorrectly attributed this complexity as originating in a diastereotopic relationship between the two m-hydrogens, which in turn we attributed as arising from the chiral nature of the anti-atropoisomer of the ligand. While this isomer of the ligand is indeed chiral (it possesses no improper axes of symmetry), we were mistaken in assigning the relationship between the m-hydrogen atoms which are in fact homotopic and not diastereotopic. As such, the complexity of the signal arises as evidently the ratio of the chemical shift difference (Δν) to the coupling constant (J) decreases in magnitude, resulting in resonances that appear as a second-order AB2 spin system.1
The original Fig. 3(b) spectrum (reproduced here as Fig. 1(a)) was recorded at 400 MHz and to support this revised (correct) interpretation, we re-recorded the 1H NMR spectrum of 3-1 at 700 MHz, (shown here as Fig. 1(b)). While the spectrum recorded at higher field remains second order with considerable roofing, it is starting to approach the simple triplet and doublet signals that would be observed in the first-order spectrum, consistent with an increase in chemical shift difference at higher field.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 1H NMR spectrum in the region of the pyridyl hydrogen atoms of compound 3-1 recorded at (a) 400 MHz and (b) 700 MHz. |
In order to understand the origin of the effect, we undertook analysis of the spectrum of the ligand and its chlorogold(III) complex. Using the approach in ref. 1, we evaluated Δν/J to be ≈2.6 for the ligand and ≈22.4 for the complex, explaining why the second-order effect is more pronounced in the ligand. Closer examination showed that the difference between the system arises due to changes in the chemical shift of the m-hydrogen atoms of the pyridine ring. They move from 8.31 ppm in the complex to 7.80 ppm in the ligand, with the chemical shift of the p-hydrogen remaining almost constant (7.84 ppm in the complex and 7.76 ppm in the ligand). The origin of this change in chemical shift would appear to arise as the steric effect of the methoxy groups in the 2,2′-positions ensure that the phenyl rings are twisted out of the plane of the pyridine ring (Fig. 2). The m-hydrogen atoms are then shielded by the phenyl ring current, leading to an upfield shift of ca. 0.5 ppm, which reduces Δν/J, causing the signal to become second order.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram to show the m-hydrogen of the pyridine ring sitting over the phenyl ring, which is twisted out of plane. |
The error came to light during the refereeing of a subsequent manuscript2 and we are grateful to one of the referees for bringing this issue to our attention.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |