Jennifer
Gubitosa
a,
Vito
Rizzi
*a,
Paola
Fini
b,
Sergio
Nuzzo
b and
Pinalysa
Cosma
ab
aDipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Via Orabona, 4-70126 Bari, Italy. E-mail: vito.rizzi@uniba.it
bConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR-IPCF, UOS Bari, Via Orabona, 4-70126 Bari, Italy
First published on 23rd February 2024
According to circular bioeconomy principles, the use of kiwi peels to remove Direct Blue 78 (DB) from water is investigated during this work, proposing food waste as a recyclable adsorbent substrate. Direct Blue 78 (DB) was adopted as a model pollutant, employing its visible spectrum to monitor its adsorption. The adsorption process was thus fully characterized, investigating the roles of ionic strength, pH values, adsorbent/pollutant amounts, and temperature. The thermodynamics, kinetics, and adsorption isotherms were also studied. To extend the kiwi peels’ lifetime, quite complete desorption was obtained by adopting hot water as a safe and eco-friendly strategy. Despite the relatively low kiwi peels’ maximum adsorption capacity (6 mg g−1) for DB when adsorbed in the presence of NaCl, 10 cycles of adsorption/desorption were attempted, proposing the recycling of both the dye and kiwi peels as dictated by circular economy principles. Dyeing experiments were also performed, evidencing the dye's ability to color cotton fabrics after its recycling. Finally, the removal of other textile dyes, Direct Red 83
:
1 and Direct Yellow 86, was demonstrated in a mixture with DB. A preliminary investigation was performed to find the best working conditions for inducing the solid-state dye photodegradation, proposing a possible alternative for the adsorbent regeneration.
000 dye types are available on the market, and more than 7 × 105 tons are generated every year. So, their presence in water effluents is attained.18 However, dyes are not biodegradable and are very stable substances, resistant to light irradiation and heat. The degradation by using oxidizing agents cannot be considered a powerful tool due to their resistance, and, in any case, hard working conditions are needed.11,12,18 It is worth mentioning that, among textile dyes, azo dyes are extensively used and account for 70% of the total dye production.18 Due to the toxicity of amine groups in their chemical structure, azo dyes are considered hazardous compounds for the whole environment.11,12,18 Due to the large color production from industries, innovative and performant ways to remove these dyes efficiently from water should be developed, with particular attention to methods that agree with green chemistry principles, sustainability, and bioeconomy concepts.19 Several advantages arise. For this purpose, among the possible strategies used for the dye's removal (such as ion exchange, coprecipitation, filtration, reverse osmosis, Fenton oxidation, photodegradation, biodegradation, ozonation, and electrochemical reduction), the adsorption methodologies have been extensively studied for water remediation.11,12,18,20–32 Indeed, adsorption is considered a low-cost approach that should avoid the release of secondary by-products as could occur, for example, when advanced oxidation processes are used.16 Furthermore, the adsorption could be easily implemented from the laboratory to industrial scale.
Due to the necessity of developing greener technologies, the innovative tendency represented by the use of wastes as adsorbent materials to remove pollutants from water has been increasing in the last few years. Particularly, the use of fruit wastes is well known, and the work of Bhatnagar et al.33 is very interesting for showing, among wastes, the use of fruit and vegetable peels for the removal of pollutants. Indeed, most fruit peels become waste without applications, with potential problems for their management. So, to face this problem, a policy is being implemented to ensure sustainable production and consumption models to achieve very important targets for the transition from linear to circular models, giving waste a new life.34 On this ground, this work proposes a sustainable management, efficient use of natural resources as dictated by bioeconomic principles, and reduction of waste through recycling to meet the requirements of the circular bioeconomy.19 An upcycling process of existing materials is thus presented, following the new eco-centric trend, valorizing the use of food wastes, particularly kiwi peels, as recyclable adsorbent materials for dye removal. Indeed, some authors of this paper recently have reported the use of this waste/adsorbent for the removal of emerging pollutants, presenting for the first time the chemical and physical features of kiwi peels.34,35 In particular, Gubitosa et al.,34,35 by the synergistic use of different techniques (such as SEM investigation, FTIR-ATR, and TG analyses), showed that the adsorbent is characterized by particular morphological features, irregular domains, and filaments on both sides of peels’ surfaces, and it is mainly constituted by lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the main morphological and chemical features of kiwi peels were also retained after their use and reuse during the adsorption/desorption processes, enabling kiwi peels as a long-lasting adsorbent material.34,35 This work aims to widen the kiwi peels’ applicability, proposing that this waste can also be used for the anionic textile dye removal from water. Indeed, about this concern, only one work is reported in the literature, and it refers to methylene blue and rhodamine B removal.36 On the other hand, kiwi peels, to our knowledge, were employed in the past to remove Cd2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+ ions,37 nitrate,38 and oil,39 sequester Pb2+,40 and, as previously said, to remove emerging pollutants.34,35 Therefore, a deep scientific research activity should be developed to promote the sustainable management of kiwi peels’ wastes to address environmental problems related to dye pollution. Moreover, an important aspect of this paper is related to the eco-friendly kiwi peel pre-treatment, avoiding hard experimental conditions and hazardous materials, as already reported by Gubitosa et al.34,35
Furthermore, the adsorbent recycling was proposed under safe conditions, demonstrating the dyestuff reuse. More specifically, kiwi peels (i) were only washed with hot water, avoiding the use of toxic chemicals, leading to the development of an eco-design in accordance with an eco-innovation model, especially for a potential future perspective to implement the process on a large-scale; (ii) hot water was used to desorb the color, regenerating the adsorbent, dyeing cotton fibers again. In detail, to highlight the main features of the proposed adsorption process, among textile dyes, an azo one, Direct Blue 78 (DB), was selected as a model anionic compound. So, the DB adsorption process has been investigated, showing the process's mechanism, related kinetics, and thermodynamic characteristics. The DB removal was observed in the presence of an acid solution (pH 2) or salts, suggesting that, during the process, the involved interacting forces were mainly electrostatic and hydrophobic. By focusing the attention on the DB removal in the presence of salt, 10 adsorption/desorption cycles were studied, avoiding the disposal of the adsorbent as secondary hazardous waste material, recovering 90% of the DB. The adsorbent lifetime was thus extended, according to the Green Economy requests.16 The maximum adsorption capacity of kiwi peels towards DB was inferred (qmax = 6 mg g−1), and it well agrees with the values obtained by other natural adsorbents during the removal of anionic dyes.18,20–32 However, if some of the used materials showed high adsorption capacities and performances,41,42 it is worth mentioning that only a few studies26,29,30,32 discussed the adsorbent regeneration, and thus the dye desorption. In particular, concentrated NaOH solutions were proposed in these studies by proposing a long contact time and low desorption efficiency, applying only a few cycles of adsorption/desorption. In contrast, in this paper, hot water is proposed for the kiwi peel regeneration, recycling both the dye and the adsorbent for 10 cycles, which could be implemented because no change in terms of kiwi peels’ efficiency was observed. Furthermore, a dye mixture was also investigated, and kiwi peels were able to remove and desorb the mixtures of colors without any competitive effects. Additionally, focusing attention on DB, the recycled color was used again to dye cotton fibers, demonstrating its reuse. Finally, preliminary results related to the solid-state DB photodegradation after the adsorption were discussed as a potential alternative for the adsorbent regeneration by using advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). In particular, the use of TiO2 and UV light appeared as the best promising approach to obtain the DB degradation that occurred ≈75% after 8 h of irradiation time, under the proposed experimental working conditions. Novel horizons in the environmental field are thus opened, considering that this adsorbent is also able to adsorb emerging pollutants from water and desorb them in salt solutions.34,35 On the other hand, the removal of color was observed in a completely reversed situation: adsorption in salt solutions and desorption in water. So, kiwi peels, compared with other adsorbents, could be potentially considered “on-demand” adsorbents, being able to remove different classes of pollutants, according to the working conditions.
It can be attributed to a π–π* transition arising from the characteristic dye chromophore, comprising azo groups (–N
N–) interacting with the adjacent aromatic moieties.11–13 This band was thus considered diagnostic to monitor the removal of color from water. As a first step, adsorption experiments were performed at room temperature by adding 50 mg of peels in distilled water at pH 6 in the presence of 13 mg L−1 of DB. The lack of DB adsorption was observed.
This result could be indicative of electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged DB and the kiwi peel surface.11–13,27,34 Accordingly, pHPZC of the adsorbent, experimentally calculated as reported in Fig. S1 (ESI†), occurred at around pH 4. So, it means that the adsorbent surface at pH < 4 and pH > 4 was positively and negatively charged, respectively.34 At the same time, DB's chemical features should be considered (see Fig. 1 for the DB chemical structure) to clarify the finding. The DB sulfonate groups (–SO3−) were always deprotonated, having a pKa < 2. This means that, at pH 6, DB was negatively charged, and it was repelled by the kiwi peels’ surface. On the other hand, the pKa value of the tertiary amino group is around 4, while primary and secondary amino groups start their deprotonation at pH 9.12 After these assessments, to favor the DB adsorption, it was necessary to lower the solution pH value. In these conditions, the adsorbent was positively charged, and favored the attraction of the DB sulphonate groups. Alternatively, it should be possible to perturb the charges by affecting the ionic strength of the solution containing DB and the adsorbent. So, in the first step, the effect of pH on the adsorption process was investigated by using eqn (1) for calculating the % of Ads, by adopting 60 minutes as the constant contact time. Fig. 2(A) reports the obtained results. As expected, the DB removal was high at pH < 4 and decreased with increasing pH values. Indeed, as can be evidenced in the inset of Fig. 1, the color of kiwi peels changed from dark brown to blue. The DB adsorption was practically absent in the range of pH 4–12. The finding confirmed the main presence of electrostatic interactions between the –SO3− moieties of DB and the surface of kiwi peels.12,34 On the other hand, the DB remained negatively charged at higher pH values, while the peels turned their charge surface from positive to negative, favoring the repulsion.
In the second step, for detailing the nature of the interaction, the % of Ads was calculated by changing the ionic strength of the solution with different salt concentrations, always adopting 60 minutes as the reference contact time. NaCl was chosen as the model electrolyte. Interesting results were obtained, as shown in Fig. 2(B). By maintaining the pH of the solution at 6 and increasing the NaCl concentration from 0.01 M to 0.1 M, the removal of DB greatly changed from 20% to 80%, and leveled off at this value. Indeed, when the salt was further increased to 0.5 and 1 M, the removal percentage was the same. The electrolyte presence partially neutralized the charges of the adsorbent surface, reducing its negative charge, and moderately favored the attraction between DB and kiwi peels. However, at the same time, the ions from the salt also shielded the DB charges; thus, hydrophobic interactions and the H-bonds formation, as already observed by Rizzi et al.9 in a similar work, could be also taken into account. So, the mechanism of adsorption changed according to the case: if, on the one hand, under acidic conditions of work, the coulombic interactions were mainly favored, on the other hand, by increasing the ionic strength at neutral pH, the salting-out effect should be additionally promoted in favor of hydrophobic interaction, as observed elsewhere.43,44 To better understand these findings, the adsorption experiments were performed at pH 2 and in the presence of NaCl (Fig. 2(C)). By diluting the solution containing NaCl to 0.01 and 0.05 M, the obtained adsorption percentages were quite consistent with those calculated at pH 2. Surprisingly, at higher NaCl concentrations, a significant reduction of the adsorption percentage was observed if compared with the results obtained at pH 2 and the corresponding measurement in the presence of salt at pH 6. These results suggest the competitive effect of ions that hindered the formation of electrostatic interactions observed under the acidic experimental working condition.11,12,16,34 In particular, possible shielding effects of charges mediated by cations/anions, both referring to DB functional groups and the adsorbent surface and competition effects between the pollutant and ions (in this case, anions), towards the positively charged adsorbent surface, should be considered.34 So, Na+ might shield the DB negative –SO3− groups, and Cl− could compete for the positive kiwi peel surface. At pH 2, the presence of salt played a negative role, and a balance of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions was observed. Starting from these considerations and inferring more information about the adsorption process, the adsorption capacities were calculated according to eqn (2). In particular, the study was performed by monitoring the adsorption evolution of DB onto kiwi peels’ surface at several contact times (Fig. 2(D)–(F)).
As the pH of the DB solution decreased or the salt (NaCl) amount increased, the qt values increased, confirming the establishment of favorable interactions between DB and the adsorbent already at the beginning of the process, when a greater increase in the adsorption capacity was observed. Indeed, when the adsorption started, the DB removal appeared fast, in agreement with the presence of more functional groups available to adsorb DB.6,12,28,34 Furthermore, a weaker DB diffusion resistance should be considered at the beginning of the process. On the other hand, extending the contact time, a plateau region was reached, indicating the attainment of an equilibrium condition where the adsorption sites were occupied by DB.6,8,34 Additionally, at the end of the adsorption, the decrease in the DB concentration gradient in the solution should slow down the whole process. Moreover, Gubitosa et al.34 reported that when the increase in qt values appeared slower, the presence of repulsive forces between the free pollutant molecules in the solution and those adsorbed onto kiwi peels, should also be considered.
Since, as a whole, the qt time evolution in solutions containing DB at pH 2 and/or in the presence of salts looked similar, without important differences, the attention was focused on DB adsorption in the presence of salts, avoiding the use of acidic experimental conditions. In particular, after the evaluation of the effects of other salts on the DB adsorption onto kiwi peels, NaCl 0.5 M was selected as the reference salt concentration, and other experiments were performed to give more details about the adsorption process.
As the adsorbent quantity increased from 12 to 80 mg, the qt values decreased. However, the plateau region starting point (the condition where the equilibrium occurred) was observed later by decreasing the adsorbent amount. For example, the qt values joined the plateau region after 20 and 50 minutes when in the presence of the highest and lowest adsorbent amount, respectively. As reported by Gubitosa et al.,34 when great amounts of adsorbent were in use, the adsorption sites were not completely saturated, restituting low qt values although the DB removal was high. These results indicated that the site's availability favored the DB's adsorption onto kiwi peels’ surface. The process was especially enhanced at the beginning of the adsorption, as shown by the rapidity of achieving the plateau region.6,12,34 Instead, by reducing the adsorbent amount, the sites for DB decreased, slowing down the DB removal, and the equilibrium was reached later.
When the initial DB concentration was changed from 50 mg L−1 to 8 mg L−1, the adsorption capacities increased (Fig. 3(B)), highlighting the importance of DB's concentration gradient, which favored the pollutant transfer from the bulk's solution to the adsorbent.12,34 As described by Gubitosa et al.,34 in the presence of a high pollutant amount, the collisions with the active free sites of the adsorbent were enhanced, favoring the adsorption. As a whole, these results suggested that the DB mass transfer and its adsorption onto the adsorbent surface could have a kinetic relevance.34 Once again, it should be mentioned that the equilibrium region was obtained earlier for diluted solutions; so, under these conditions, more free active sites were available and favored the DB removal, confirming their role during the process.6,8,34
By increasing the temperature values, the DB adsorption capacities increased, evidencing the endothermic character of the process.29,34 In particular, the temperature effect was especially highlighted at the beginning of the adsorption process due to, once again, the presence of more free sites to host DB. So, by considering the obtained qt values and the amount of the not adsorbed DB at equilibrium, Keq was calculated for each temperature. Eqn (6) was thus applied to calculate the ΔG° values for each temperature, as reported in Table 1.
Negative ΔG° values were obtained, indicating the spontaneity of the process that occurred favored with the increase of the temperature.16,29,34 By using eqn (7), i.e., by plotting ln(Keq) versus 1/T (Fig. 4(B)), the
and
values are inferred and reported in Table 1. The high positive values of
(+160 kJ mol−1) confirmed the endothermic character of the process. On the other hand,
(+95 J mol−1 K) suggested, as observed in other studies, that at the adsorbent–adsorbate interface, the DB adsorption increased the randomness.16,29,34
The correlation factor R2, arising from each linear fitting (Table 2), suggested the applicability of all the isotherm models, with a minor extent of the Langmuir one. In particular, the best fitting was observed with the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.98199). Overall, Table 2 reports the isotherm parameters calculated for each model. The results suggested that the pollutant adsorption occurred on heterogeneous surfaces, as already observed in other similar studies. Additionally, the value of the n parameter (see Table 2), derived from the Freundlich model, represents the adsorption strength, and the values of 1/n ranging from 0 to 1, as herein observed, proved that the physical DB adsorption was favored. The KL value from the Langmuir model also supported this observation since it occurred between 0 and 1; it indicated that the adsorption was favorited for the adsorbate–adsorbent system.16,29,34 Finally, the D–R model was applied, and the related parameters are reported in Table 2. The small value of E highlighted the important involvement of physical forces during the DB adsorption onto the kiwi peel surface, further confirming the previous results. Indeed, the obtained value of 1 kJ mol−1 was less than 8 kJ mol−1.16,29,34 All these findings agreed with the calculated value of
.
| Langmuir isotherm model | Temkin isotherm model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K L (L mg−1) | Q 0 mg g−1 | R 2 | K T (L mol−1) | B 1 | R 2 |
| 0.02 | 26.00 | 0.9493 | 2.85 | 1.20 | 0.96115 |
| Freundlich isotherm model | ||
|---|---|---|
| K F (L mg−1) | 1/n | R 2 |
| 1.60 | 0.40 | 0.98199 |
| D–R isotherm model | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| K D–R (mol2 J−2) | Q 0 (mg g−1) | E (kJ mol−1) | R 2 |
| 5.0 × 10−7 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 0.9465 |
Specifically, water (pH 6) and alkaline solution (pH 12) at 298 K favored the process, further improved with the increase of temperature at 323 K, as reported in Fig. 6(A). The slight differences in terms of % of desorption between water at pH 6, and pH 12 can be better appreciated in the inset of Fig. 6(A) when a short contact time of desorption was adopted. The alkaline solution slightly favored the DB desorption, and the finding can be interpreted with the negligible presence, also in this condition, of electrostatic interactions involving an ion-exchange mechanism. A similar behavior was obtained when kiwi peels loaded with DB from an acidic solution were considered (Fig. 6(B), and the inset). In this case, according to the main electrostatic nature of the interactions between DB and the adsorbent surface, the release in water at pH 6 was not favored unless at higher temperatures. On the other hand, the use of water at pH 12 ensured the DB release at room and high temperature without important differences, confirming the role of coulombic forces under acid conditions of work. On this ground, to propose kiwi peels as a recyclable adsorbent material (focusing the attention on DB adsorbed from a NaCl solution), 10 cycles of adsorption and desorption were consecutively performed, choosing hot water (323 K) at pH 6 as the best condition for the desorption. Moreover, 15 minutes were selected as the desorption contact time. Specifically, after DB adsorption from a 0.5 M NaCl solution in 60 minutes, the adsorbent was swollen in hot water for 15 minutes. The % of adsorption and desorption was thus calculated and reported in Fig. 6(C). Very interestingly, the adsorbent maintained the same efficiency without significant differences in each cycle, highlighting the great performance of the proposed material as a low-cost and eco-friendly adsorbent for water treatment. Furthermore, the adsorption capacity of kiwi peels was also calculated after the 10th cycle of adsorption/desorption, and it was compared with the results related to the first cycle. Fig. 6(D) shows the obtained results. As can be appreciated, the qt values at different adsorption times were practically superimposed, evidencing the great performance of kiwi peels. So, the runs could be extended up to 10 cycles for rendering this novel adsorbent, proposed to treat water from dyes, competitive with other more efficient materials, respecting the sustainability principles. Indeed, regarding the past literature, the use of hot water appeared eco-friendly because the desorption time was very low. For example, Singh et al.,26 about the removal of Congo Red and Direct Blue-1, reported the mycosynthesized iron nanoparticle regeneration by using a 0.08 M NaOH solution for 120 min. The obtained regenerated adsorbents were further reused, and only five cycles of regeneration were performed. The recovery of Direct Red 81 adsorbed on Argemone mexicana was achieved again by eluting the dye in NaOH solution.29 Li et al.30 reported the Direct green 6 removal and NaOH solutions were proposed for the desorption from Y(III)-chitosan-doped fly ash composite. During the study, although 5 cycles of desorption were attempted, the reported adsorption efficiencies collapsed at increasing the runs of adsorption/desorption. Noreen et al.32 showed the ZnO, MgO, and FeO high adsorption efficiencies for Direct sky Blue dye removal. However, also, in this case, the desorption was performed using 0.1–0.9 M NaOH32 for a long contact time, at least 120 minutes with low desorption %. Moreover, always for DB removal, also Rizzi et al.11,12 accounted for the regeneration of olive pomace and MCM-41 nanoparticles with NaOH. Only a few cycles of adsorption/desorption were described, and in the case of MCM-41, the adsorbent appeared disrupted after 5 runs.11,12 On the other hand, during this work, DB was recycled under safer experimental conditions, presenting a long-lasting material.
O groups from hemicellulose esters or carbonyl esters of lignin was observed. The stretching and bending vibration that arose from the hydroxyl groups of cellulose was detected at 1614 cm−1. The C
O stretching vibration in the conjugated carbonyl of lignin should also be taken into account. The strong band at 1030 cm−1 was referred to as the –C–O–C– vibration from the skeleton of cellulose and hemicellulose. In the region 1100 and 1500 cm−1 other weak bands were observed and attributed to CH3, –CH2–, and C–H moieties, besides the polyphenolic aromatic ring C
C vibration due to the presence of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The contribution of C–O vibrations in carboxylate groups, and the stretching of esters, ethers, or phenol groups, should be taken into account. The same features were observed after the DB adsorption (red curve), from a solution at pH 6 and NaCl 0.5 M, with slight changes in band position and relative intensity. The contribution of the adsorbed DB was not significantly detected (Fig. S6B, ESI† shows the ATR-FTIR signals of DB). Conversely, focusing the attention on the typical vibration bands of kiwi peels, the signal at 1614 cm−1 shifted to a higher wavenumber, 1622 cm−1, appearing better defined, suggesting the DB coordination with cellulose OH moieties.34 Accordingly, the OH signal at 3307 cm−1 increased its relative intensity and slightly shifted, denoting the possible formation of the H-bond with DB and the adsorbent surface, besides the OH moieties vibration contribution from DB. These observations suggested the presence of H-bonds and hydrophobic interactions between DB and the kiwi peels, as previously evidenced during the discussion. Finally, after the adsorbent recycling (green line), the IR bands’ position, shape, and relative intensity appeared the same as those recorded at the beginning of the adsorption process, validating that the main adsorbent functional groups and features were not affected during the prolonged adsorption/desorption runs, as already reported by Gubitosa et al.34 during the removal/recycling of ciprofloxacin.
The visible spectra were collected before and after the contact with the adsorbent by selecting 60 minutes as the contact time. The high efficiency of adsorption can be appreciated in Fig. 7(A). More than 50% of each pollutant was removed from the water. Interestingly, also for the mixture of the dyes, their desorption and regeneration of kiwi peels were attained. By following the same procedure to desorb DB, in Fig. 7(B), the visible spectrum of the dye-mixture after the desorption is reported. As indicated by the green circle, the DB contribution appears greater than other dyes during the desorption, as if it was preferentially desorbed with respect to DY and DR. However, the adsorbent regeneration could be considered a success, being able to desorb the three dyes even if with different efficiencies and the absence of selectivity. These results appeared very promising for the possible scale-up of the process to treat real wastewater samples. Novel horizons in treating water polluted by dyes are thus opened: kiwi peels can be considered a low-cost and environmentally friendly adsorbent, able to adsorb different dyes and emerging pollutants without selectivity and important effects of competition, as also reported in our previous study.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 8 Dyeing experiments of white cotton fabrics (A) with DB prior to the adsorption onto kiwi peels (B), and after the desorption from kiwi peels used 5 times (C), and 10 times (D). | ||
Fig. 8(A) and (B) show the cotton fabrics, respectively, before and after the dying process. Interestingly, the dyeing capacity of DB was retained after its adsorption onto kiwi peels, although the adsorbent was used for several cycles. In particular, Fig. 8(C) and (D) show the cotton fabrics colored with DB released by kiwi peels after the 5th and 10th cycles of adsorption/desorption, respectively. The obtained results are very interesting because the kiwi peels could be used directly in a dying batch, releasing the dye to color fibers again, lowering the associated costs. Indeed, hot water is usually required during the dyeing process.
Therefore, during this work, a preliminary study was carried out by proposing the use of AOPs to induce, in this case, the DB solid-state photodegradation after the adsorption onto kiwi peels. The main aim was to find the best experimental conditions for obtaining the highest DB degradation and propose an alternative adsorbent regeneration strategy. Indeed, Gubitosa et al.34 demonstrated that the main kiwi peel features are also retained after the AOP treatments, not affecting the adsorption capacity of the material. On this basis, the attention was focused on the synergistic use of UV light, H2O2, UV-TiO2, UV/H2O2/TiO2, Fenton, and photo-Fenton conditions.45–50 Indeed, in these experimental conditions, the main product is the radical ˙OH:3,6,8,45–47,50 a very reactive and not selective species that favors the pollutants’ fast degradation. Furthermore, the use of TiO2, H2O2, and Fenton reagents in the presence of UV light should promote the additional formation of ˙OH. In detail, the experiments were performed by placing the kiwi peels after the adsorption in water (15 mL) at pH 2 under UV light irradiation. The choice of working at acidic pH was determined by considering that DB degradation is favored at low pH.46 Moreover, focusing the attention on the photocatalytic action of TiO2, since an important step in the photocatalytic oxidations is the adsorption of the species onto the photocatalyst surface, under acidic conditions, the TiO2 surface is positively charged, so the adsorption of negatively charged DB is furtherly facilitated.46 According to the cases reported in Fig. 9, the water solution surrounding kiwi peels was spiked with the explored oxidant's agents.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 9 % of DB photodegradation under different working conditions at pH 2. Effect of: UV light, TiO2 amount (A); TiO2 + H2O2 (B); photo-Fenton conditions (C); UV light irradiation time on TiO2 (D). | ||
The % of photodegraded DB was evaluated through release experiments in hot water after the performed oxidative treatments. In the first step, the degradation was attempted by placing DB-loaded kiwi peels in water and irradiating with a UV lamp for 2 h (Fig. 9(A)). Only 10% of the adsorbed DB was destroyed. After that, the loaded adsorbent was placed in a solution containing only H2O2 at different concentrations (from 5 × 10−4 M to 5 × 10−2 M), both in the dark and under UV light. The absence of any degradation was detected. The use of TiO2, suspended in water, was thus considered in different amounts by adopting, again, 2 h as irradiation time (Fig. 9(A)). The best condition was observed by placing kiwi peels in a suspension containing 1 mg of TiO2, thus obtaining ≈45% DB's degradation (Fig. 9(A)). The further increase of TiO2 amount increased the opacity of the suspension, hindering the light penetration and decreasing the hydroxyl radical formation.46 So, fixing the TiO2 amount at 1 mg, the effect of adding H2O2 was investigated. As shown in Fig. 9(B), adding H2O2 in different concentrations (ranging from 5 × 10−4 M to 5 × 10−2 M) did not improve the process, probably due to the hydroxyl radicals self-quenching in the solution surrounding kiwi peels.34 Indeed, the ˙OH quenching occurred rapidly, preventing the radicals’ migration from the bulk of the solution to the adsorbent surface where DB was located.34 Furthermore, the UV “filter” effect of H2O2 could reduce the TiO2 activation. Indeed, by increasing the H2O2 amount from 5 × 10−4 M to 5 × 10−2 M, due to the H2O2 photolysis, the effect of hydroxyl radical self-quenching was more pronounced, achieving only ≈35% of DB's degradation with 1 mg of TiO2 and H2O2 1 × 10−3 M. The latter condition was also explored by increasing the TiO2 amount from 1 mg to 2 mg, not improving the DB degradation process that remained at ≈45%. Subsequently, the photo-Fenton reagent was used (Fig. 9(C)). Experiments were performed under UV light irradiation for 2 h using different amounts of H2O2, fixing the concentration of Fe2+ at 5 × 10−6 M. Under these conditions, the DB's degradation was not high (from ≈10% to 20%), and the increase of H2O2 concentration (or [Fe2+]) did not improve the results. These findings could be explained, once again, considering that the self-quenching of hydroxyl radicals is the preferred process in solution. Indeed, by increasing the amount of H2O2, the effect was more pronounced. The same experiments were performed in the dark, without significant DB degradation. The addition of TiO2 (1 mg) was also attempted under photo-Fenton conditions, and for example, when using H2O2 1 × 10−3 M and 1 mg of TiO2, the ≈15% of DB was degraded, not enhancing the process (Fig. 9(C)).
As a general result, the discussed strategies cannot be considered useful for solid-state degradation of the dye because they do not improve the result obtained from the use of simple TiO2, which could be considered the best condition investigated. So, fixing the TiO2 amount at 1 mg, further experiments were performed by irradiating kiwi peels with UV light and increasing the irradiation time (Fig. 9(D)). The increase in irradiation time significantly improved the DB degradation observing ≈30%, 45%, 65%, and 75% after 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h, respectively. So, the photocatalytic process could be used in synergy or as a potential alternative to the main approach discussed that proposes the DB's desorption.
In this regard, some experiments were performed to investigate if the adsorption capacity of kiwi peels changes after using UV light and TiO2, or if it remains the same as that observed previous to the treatment. In accordance with what was reported by Gubitosa et al.,34 the use of TiO2 and UV light did not affect the main chemical and morphological features of kiwi peels.
901 L mol−1 cm−1.
![]() | (1) |
The adsorption capacities, qt (mg g−1), for kiwi peels were calculated by applying eqn (2) to the experimental data.2,11,13,15,34
![]() | (2) |
50 mg of adsorbent was swelled into 15 mL of water in the presence of DB having different initial concentrations (from 25 mg L−1 to 8 mg L−1) at pH 6, to assess the DB amount role during the adsorption onto the kiwi peel surface. On the other hand, the adsorbent amount role was investigated by changing the weight of peels from 12 to 80 mg, in the presence of DB 13 mg L−1, pH 6. The process was studied with constant stirring at room temperature (298 K). The solution's ionic strength was changed by using different salts after fixing the amount of the adsorbate and adsorbent (50 mg of kiwi peels, and 13 mg L−1 of DB). NaCl was adopted to infer the role of salt concentrations. The pH values, ranging from 2 to 12, and temperature values, from 275 to 333 K, were also changed during the adsorption.
| ln(qe − qt) = ln(qe) − K1 × t | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
Eqn (5) was also used to infer the intraparticle diffusion role described by the Weber–Morris equation.34
| qt = kint × t1/2 + C | (5) |
In this case, kint represents the kinetic constant expressed in mg (g−1 min−1/2), referred to as the intra-particle diffusion rate, and C is the thickness of the boundary layer.
ΔG° = −RT ln Keq | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
In eqn (8), qe (mg g−1) is the pollutant adsorbed amount at equilibrium, Ce is the correspondent equilibrium concentration in solution expressed in mg L−1, KL represents the Langmuir equilibrium constant (L mg−1), and Q0 is the adsorbent maximum adsorption capacity (mg g−1) value.34
The Freundlich isotherm, if fitted with the experimental data, should reflect the DB adsorption onto a heterogeneous surface with adsorption sites having different energies as a function of the surface coverage. In this case, the heat of adsorption should decrease exponentially during the DB removal. Eqn (9) describes the Freundlich model.34
![]() | (9) |
The Temkin model describes the influence of the adsorbate–adsorbent interactions on the adsorption energy. This isotherm suggests that the heat of adsorption should decrease linearly during the DB removal due to adsorbent/adsorbate interactions. Eqn (10) was applied to use the Temkin model.34
qe = B1 ln(KT) + B1 ln(Ce) | (10) |
The Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm (D–R) model was also employed by applying eqn (11). In this case, the model assumes the adsorption onto a heterogeneous surface in which a Gaussian energy distribution can be used.34
ln qe = ln(Qe) − KD–R × ε2 | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
It is worth mentioning that this model can distinguish between physical and chemical adsorption by calculating the value of energy, E, by using eqn (13).
![]() | (13) |
If the output value of E is in the range of 8–16 kJ mol−1, the chemisorption should be considered during the adsorption process; conversely, for E < 8 kJ mol−1, the physisorption should be more important.28,34
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cp00174e |
| This journal is © the Owner Societies 2024 |