Zachary T.
Gossage
,
Tomooki
Hosaka
,
Tatsuo
Matsuyama
,
Ryoichi
Tatara
and
Shinichi
Komaba
*
Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan. E-mail: komaba@rs.tus.ac.jp
First published on 2nd December 2022
Graphite is a promising negative electrode material for emerging potassium ion batteries (KIBs), offering a good capacity and a low-potential discharge plateau. To date, achieving long cycle life KIBs with graphite remains limited due to the formation of an unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), especially in common potassium hexafluorophosphate (KPF6) electrolytes. Herein, we show that fluorosulfonamide-type additives, such as dimethyl sulfamoyl fluoride (DMSF) or potassium bis(fluorosulfonyl)amide (KFSA), can be incorporated into KPF6 electrolytes to improve the cycling performance of graphite. In half-cells, 1 and 10 wt% added DMSF showed significant improvements in the charge/discharge coulombic efficiency (CE) and a low cell polarization. Adding DMSF to full cells (graphite‖K2Mn[Fe(CN)6]) further showed a high capacity retention of 68% after 500 cycles compared with 37% for the additive-free electrolyte. Even higher performance was observed when combining DMSF with KFSA in the same electrolyte, demonstrating a capacity retention of 85% after 500 cycles. Electrochemical impedance measurements suggested an improved charge transfer resistance in DMSF containing electrolytes. Ex situ analyses of the graphite surface indicated differences in the SEI composition for the similar structured additives. Notably, N incorporation was not observed with DMSF, but only when using KFSA, suggesting differences in degradation products and incorporation into the SEI. At the same time, computational analyses suggested similar HOMO and LUMO energy levels for the additives. This presents an opportunity to tune a portion of the fluorosulfonamide structure for further improving the SEI and KIB performance.
Currently, graphite is the most promising negative electrode material for commercializing KIBs with a relatively high density of 2.3 g cm−3, reasonable theoretical capacity (279 mA h g−1 for KC8vs. 372 mA h g−1 for LiC6) and similar redox potential for K+ insertion compared with Li+.1,3 Reports have already demonstrated capacities close to the theoretical value and showed opportunity for faster (de)intercalation rates compared with LIBs.7,8,12,17 However, many reports on graphite show fast capacity fading during cycling and poor first cycle irreversible capacities, especially in carbonate-based electrolytes using potassium hexafluorophosphate (KPF6).8,12,18,19 To some extent, this behavior is attributed to large volume expansion during ion insertion (59.7% for K+ compared with 10.7% for Li+) which can disrupt interphase formation.20 Our group and others showed improvements in the graphite performance and coulombic efficiencies (CEs) when using robust binders based on sodium polyacrylate (PANa) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) for preparing the electrodes.7,21,22 In addition, improvements in the electrolyte were also shown to influence the CE and cycle stability of graphite, presumably through their influence on the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI).1,3
As graphite is charged, its electrode potential substantially decreases to potentials which can reduce commonly used organic carbonate solvents (e.g. ethylene carbonate (EC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), etc.). This leads to formation of a nanoscale film on the graphite surface, the SEI, composed of electrolyte-derived components, such as fluorides, carbonates, and polymeric structures.23,24 While the SEI is an essential and common component in high-voltage batteries, understanding and improving its complex structure still remains a difficult task in battery research.1,24–26 Multiple strategies are being explored for improving SEI chemistry including optimization of the electrolyte composition,9,27–29 electrolyte additives,16,30 and artificial SEI.31–33 Several studies have shown benefits by replacing the KPF6 electrolyte salt with potassium bis(fluorosulfonyl)amide (KFSA) or potassium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) amide (KTFSA).34–37 Replacing the electrolyte could prove a successful approach, but KFSA and other alternatives tend to be significantly more expensive than conventional carbonate solvents paired with KPF6. Instead of full electrolyte replacement, an alternative step is to use SEI-modifying additives for improving the cell while maintaining a reasonable cost.16,30,38
Electrolyte additives have been extensively reported for improving LIBs,39,40 but remain limited for KIB applications. A few studies evaluated fluoroethylene carbonate additives for altering SEI chemistry and improving the cycling performance in K electrolytes, but this additive tended to increase polarization and resistance.18,19,38 Other additives, including difluoroethylene carbonate and vinylene carbonate, also negatively impacted cell polarization.41 Recently, our group reported a sulfate ester additive in K-metal cells without increased cell polarization.30 Unfortunately, such positive effects were not observed when using the same additive with graphite negative electrodes. In another recent study, we showed improved performance of graphite in KIBs when using a mixed electrolyte of KPF6 and KFSA.9 This addition of KFSA to the electrolyte led to a different interphase composition and improved the ionic conductivity, rate performance and CE for full cells using a graphite electrode. Here, we further expand on this concept to explore the impact of multiple fluorosulfonamide-type additives on graphite performance, including KFSA, dimethylsulfamoyl fluoride (DMSF) and diethylsulfamoyl fluoride (DESF), as shown in Fig. 1.
We targeted the DMSF and DESF additives based on their similar structure to the FSA− anion, which has been shown to improve the SEI structure and graphite performance in K+ electrolytes.9,34,37 Like FSA−, DMSF and DESF both contain fluorosulfonamide-type functionalities in their structure (Fig. 1), and thus, they likely contribute to the SEI in similar ways. However, the impact of varying the structure of such additives has not been explored. To date, DMSF was explored as a battery solvent in Li metal batteries,42 but it has not yet been utilized in KIBs. DESF also has not yet been applied in batteries. When using these additives at concentrations of 1 and 10 wt% in a 0.75 mol kg−1 KPF6 electrolyte, we found that DMSF was successful in improving the initial charge/discharge CE and subsequent capacity access. In contrast to other additives, DMSF improved cell performance without increasing polarization, and showed compatibility with high-voltage Prussian blue (PB) positive electrodes in graphite‖K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] full cell measurements for up to 500 cycles. Further, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements indicated a reduction in charge transfer resistance when adding DMSF to the electrolyte. Surface analysis of the graphite electrodes cycled with each additive showed notable differences in the SEI composition despite the similar additive structure.
The ionic conductivity was characterized using a conductivity meter (TOA DK CT-58101B) in ∼2 mL volume of each electrolyte. All samples were prepared inside a glovebox. After adding the electrolyte to a test tube, the conductivity meter was attached and sealed with parafilm. The meter and sample were transferred outside the glovebox and placed in a temperature-controlled box at 25 °C and the conductivity was recorded after 2 hours. The electrolyte viscosity was analyzed using a DMA 4100 M density meter. Raman analysis of the additive-free, 10 wt% KFSA and 10 wt% DMSF electrolytes was performed using a 532 nm laser and a Raman spectrometer (Raman 11i, Nanophoton) at room temperature. The samples were sealed in a quartz tube inside a glovebox prior to analysis. The Raman shifts were normalized to the E2g band of HOPG (1581 cm−1).43
For preparation of K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] (Mn-PB) positive electrodes, the active material was synthesized according to previous reports.8 Mn-PB, Ketjen black (EC600JD, Carbon ECP, Lion) and polytetrafluoroethylene (F-104, Daikin) powders were manually mixed in the mass ratio 7:
2
:
1 using a mortar and pestle until a uniform mass was acquired. Thereafter, the mixture was flattened and cut into 10 mm discs. The composite electrode discs were placed on top of Al mesh current collectors and pressed between two pieces of Al foil at 20 MPa for approximately 5 minutes. The electrodes were stored inside a glovebox until further use.
For K metal counter electrodes, a piece of K metal was taken from storage under kerosene, dried and cut to remove the surface layers on all sides. The piece of fresh metal was placed inside a plastic bag containing DEC and flattened. Discs were cut from the flattened K metal sheet to act as the counter electrodes for half-cell measurements. The same procedure was applied for preparing K metal reference electrodes, except that the fresh K metal was cut into small strips and pressed into a ring shape.
With further cycling, the additive-free cell, KFSA and DMSF cells continued to show stable discharge capacities, while DESF showed unstable cycling behavior with a gradual increase in polarization (Fig. 2b and S3†). The additive-free cell's CE slowly improved to ∼96% by the 25th cycle. On the other hand, adding 10 wt% KFSA or DMSF resulted in a rapid increase in CE to >98% by the second and 10th cycles, respectively. Some of the benefits gained with KFSA may be due to the accompanied increase in the electrolyte concentration, as we previously reported when adding KFSA to a KPF6 electrolyte.9 Raman analysis of the electrolytes indicated that EC-solubilization of K+ was improved with the addition of KFSA (Fig. S4†),49,50 and the ionic conductivity was increased (Table S1†). However, for the DMSF and DESF additives, the ionic conductivity was decreased compared with the additive-free electrolyte. Their Raman spectra did not suggest a major impact on K+-solvation (Fig. S4†). We also note that the electrolyte viscosity of KPF6 in EC:
DEC was increased by the addition of KFSA and decreased when adding DMSF or DESF. Though increased viscosity can lower ionic conductivity and transport in electrolyte solutions,51 this was not observed for our additive-containing electrolytes. The improved CE suggests a more stable interphase for KFSA and DMSF-added electrolytes,52 while DESF appeared to disrupt the interphase stability. If the SEI was unstable and undergoing dissolution or incompletely formed, we would expect continued electrolyte decomposition throughout the charge and discharge process leading to a low CE, as observed in the DESF and additive-free cells.1,35,53 Despite the similarity between DMSF and DESF, differences in their decomposition products may lead to distinct SEI makeups which could alter the performance and stability. A similar case is observed for EC and PC with their electrochemical decomposition resulting in unique decomposition products.24
Next, we further explored each of the additives at 1 wt% addition under the same cycling conditions in graphite‖K metal half-cells. Electrolyte additives have been explored across a wide range of concentrations with different effects on battery performance.16,30,54 For all the additives, we again observed discharge capacities of >240 mA h g−1 (Fig. S5†) and improvements in the average CE (Fig. 2c). For KFSA, the average CE was similar at ∼99% for both 1 and 10 wt%. When using 1 wt% DMSF, we observed an average CE of ∼95%, compared to >97% for 10 wt% DMSF. Using 1 wt% DESF led to an improved CE and cycling performance compared with the additive-free cell. Overall, our results show promise for utilizing small amounts of 1 wt% or less to sufficiently alter the SEI chemistry and improve the overall performance of the cell.
Interestingly, when comparing the differential capacity (dQ/dV) curves for the first cycle of the 1 and 10 wt% DMSF cells (Fig. 2d), we found that they showed almost identical electrochemistry (Fig. 2d, inset). For easier comparison, we aligned the curves based on the peaks for intercalation; we note that a reference electrode was not used so the exact potentials could show some variation between the cells caused by a different cell polarization. For the dQ/dV curve of the DMSF cell, we observed a peak that initiated at more positive potentials compared to the additive-free cell. These peaks disappeared in the second cycle highlighting them as irreversible, SEI-type reactions (Fig. S6†). Likewise, we observed similar dQ/dV curves for the KFSA cells at 1 or 10 wt% (Fig. S7a†) that were in agreement with higher KFSA concentrations.9 The differential capacity curves for DESF were not very distinct from those of the additive-free electrolyte (Fig. S7b†). The peak occurring at more positive potentials for the additives is likely due to the easier decomposition of their fluorosulfonyl moiety, e.g. the F–S bond, that occurs prior to reduction of KPF6 and the EC:
DEC solvent.55 Apart from the interphase chemistry, the dQ/dV curves looked similar in the intercalation region among all the cells suggesting that all the graphite electrodes undergo similar reactions with K+ ions after formation of their unique SEI.
Next, we examined the impact of 10 wt% DMSF and KFSA on rate performance using a three-electrode setup with a graphite working electrode, a K metal counter electrode, and a separate, pre-cycled K metal electrode as the reference.41 The DESF additive was not evaluated due to its poor performance in the cycling measurements as described already. The graphite electrode was again cycled between 0 and 2.0 V vs. K. The charging rate was gradually increased every 5 cycles from 0.1C up to 1C, while the discharge rate was maintained at 0.1C throughout the measurement. As with our cycling measurements, we observed an improved CE for the DMSF and KFSA additives (Fig. S8†), and modest improvements in capacity access up to a rate of 0.5C (Fig. S9†) in line with concentrated KFSA electrolytes.8,37 On the other hand, the cell polarization was notably increased when using the KFSA additive (Fig. 3). At 0.1C, the polarization between all three cells was comparable, but as the rate was increased polarization became more significant in the KFSA cell (Fig. 3b). The increased polarization may be related to a difference in the properties of the SEI formed with 10 wt% KFSA.56 The addition of DMSF to the cell did not lead to any notable increase in polarization and was comparable to the KPF6 cell at rates up to 1C. From a practical standpoint, it is important for additives to improve cell performance (e.g. CE, capacity access and retention, and resistance) to maintain good energy efficiencies within a device.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Charge curves at different rates for (a) additive-free, (b) 10 wt% added KFSA and (c) 10 wt% added DMSF. Curves shown are the results for the 5th charging cycle at each rate. |
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 Full cell cycling with 10 wt% fluorosulfonamide additives. (a) First charge–discharge curves at 0.1C. (b) Extracted discharge capacities and CE for cells during cycling. |
Due to the promising results with the DMSF additive, we further evaluated its impact on performance during extended cycling. We found that the improved CE attained when using DMSF led to a higher discharge capacity across 100 cycles at 0.1C compared with the additive-free KPF6 electrolyte (Fig. S11†). Though the overall performance was improved, the capacity retention at this low rate was not significant compared to the additive-free cell. This suggests that the SEI could still be undergoing some dissolution or DMSF oxidation at the cathode may be occurring. We did observe notable oxidation of DMSF at high additive concentrations of 40–50% (Fig. S12†). Looking further, we evaluated the DMSF additive during cycling at a faster rate of 1C, again in a full cell configuration (Fig. 5). In this case, the cell was initially cycled at a 0.1C rate for 5 cycles to stabilize the SEI, and thereafter, the rate was increased to 1C for the remaining cycles (Fig. S13†). As with our other measurements, we observed an improved average CE of 99.73%, compared to 99.23% for the additive-free cell across 500 cycles (Fig. 5a). As seen in Fig. 5b, the capacity retention was also significantly improved to an average capacity of 153.8 mA h g−1 compared to the additive-free electrolyte (102.7 mA h g−1). This ∼50% improvement across a long cycling-time is quite promising for attaining long-life KIBs.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 Extended cycling performance of graphite‖Mn-PB cells with 10 wt% DMSF. (a) CE and (b) extracted discharge capacities for cells cycled in 0.75 mol kg−1 KPF6 in EC![]() ![]() |
Considering the benefits of adding KFSA observed here and in our previous work,9 we evaluated the impact of using the DMSF and KFSA additives combined in the same cell. We utilized an optimized electrolyte based on 1 mol kg−1 K(PF6)0.75(FSA)0.25 in EC:
PC (ethylene carbonate
:
propylene carbonate, 1
:
1 v/v), i.e. ∼19 wt% KFSA, which tended to show high performance in full cells.9 Again, the cells were initially cycled at a 0.1C rate for 5 cycles to stabilize their SEI, before the rate was increased to 1C (Fig. S14†). As seen in Fig. 5c and d, the optimized electrolyte containing KPF6–KFSA improved performance for both cells with or without DMSF compared to using the KPF6 electrolyte in EC
:
DEC. However, with further addition of DMSF to the optimized electrolyte, we found major improvements in the performance of the cell. Compared with the 10 wt% DMSF and the optimized electrolyte alone, the combination of both in the optimized electrolyte led to a further improved polarization at 1C. The capacity retention was successfully improved to 82.4% after 500 cycles compared to only 65.4% for the cell without DMSF. These results indicate independent benefits from DMSF and KFSA on cell performance and potential for using DMSF additives in other optimized electrolytes.
To further investigate the origin of the improved performance, we used a three-electrode configuration to evaluate the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the cycled graphite electrodes. After 2–3 cycles at 0.1C charge/discharge rate, the graphite electrodes were fully reduced to 0 V and allowed to briefly rest for equilibration, then the EIS was collected at open circuit (typically ∼200 mV vs. K). Less resistive charge transfer was observed when using 10 wt% DMSF in both the KPF6/EC:
DEC and optimized KPF6/KFSA/EC
:
PC compared with 10 wt% KFSA and additive-free electrolytes (Fig. S15†). By evaluating the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) and SEI resistance (RSEI) using an equivalent circuit model (Fig. S16†),44 we found that the optimized electrolyte with DMSF showed the lowest Rct followed by DMSF in KPF6 in EC
:
DEC (Table S2†). RSEI tended to show relatively high error for our fittings, but suggested RSEI was the lowest for 10 wt% DMSF and the highest for 10 wt% KFSA. Clearly, the DMSF additive can improve the charge-transfer properties for the graphite electrode. Despite the similar structures of DMSF and KFSA, their precise role and resulting impact in the cell appear to be unique. We suspect that this is related to their decomposition chemistry and incorporation of byproducts into the SEI.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 SEM and EDS measurements on cycled graphite electrodes. (a) SEM images of graphite electrodes after 10 cycles in cells containing 10 wt% of each additive. (b) EDS results of each cell. |
To further investigate the surface structure, we used XPS analysis of the same samples. For comparison, all the peaks were aligned based on the peak for sp2 carbon (284.4 eV), which also showed good alignment for the K 2p peaks of each sample (Fig. S21†). For the C 1s region (Fig. 7a–c and S22†), we observed multiple overlapping peaks that showed some differences among each sample. In general, the spectra could be deconvoluted to peaks located at binding energies of approximately 284.4, 285, 285.9, 286.8, and 288.8 eV, assigned to graphite (sp2 C), hydrocarbons, alcohols/ethers, carbonyl/potassium carboxylate, and ester/carboxylate, respectively.45,61,62 In the C 1s region, we also note an additional peak at approximately 283 eV that was previously reported as a K–C interaction, such as plated or residual intercalated K.16,62 While the graphite peak was dominant in all the cells, the other peaks are likely derived from solvent, electrolyte and additive decomposition reactions. For the additive-free cell, we observed significant organic content relative to the graphite peak including high hydrocarbon and potassium carboxylate content (Fig. 7a). The KFSA sample showed smaller relative amounts of organic moieties that deconvoluted to hydrocarbons, ester/carboxylate and ether/alcohol species. Previous reports suggest greater amounts of C content in the SEI for graphite and other anodes when cycled in additive-free KPF6 electrolytes compared with cycling in KFSA.9,36 Interestingly, the graphite electrode cycled with DMSF also showed large relative amounts of C species with a significant carbonyl/potassium carboxylate peak (Fig. 7c). The XPS results for the DESF cell were similar to those of the KFSA cell with a relatively dominant sp2 C peak suggesting a thin SEI or low relative organic content (Fig. S22†).
Looking at the deconvoluted F 1s region for each of the samples (Fig. 7d–f and S23†), we observed peaks indicative of KF (∼683 eV), electrolyte peaks (∼687 eV), and KxPFy or organic fluorides (∼689.5 eV).62,63 The main peak for all the samples, PF at 687 eV, can be attributed to residual electrolyte or its oxidized product. In addition, KFSA showed the largest, relative peak area for KF compared to the other cells. KF is a well-known SEI component that has been reported in KPF6 and KFSA cells,57 though its content tends to be relatively low for the SEI formed in an additive-free, KPF6 electrolyte.36 The role of KF and its criticality toward stable SEI performance remains poorly understood. It has been argued that KF presents insulative characteristics with high chemical stability and low solubility in carbonate solvents,34,36,64,65 but other studies suggest that KF leads to high interfacial cell resistance and poor ion transfer from the bulk-electrolyte to the electrode.66,67 If we normalize the data based on the C 1s region for all samples or alternatively with the P–F peak in the same region, we would observe a much lower relative content of KF in our DMSF, DESF and additive-free samples compared to the KFSA sample. Though this is not quantitative and we cannot rule out possible loss of the material from the surface due to dissolution processes during rinsing,62 the analysis suggests differences in the building of the SEI composition which likely plays a role in the observed improvements in performance. This agrees well with our cycling results that show FSA− and DMSF, despite their similar structure, uniquely impact performance. We further postulate that high KF content may not be critical to negative electrode performance in KIBs66 as its role is likely shared with other SEI components and grain boundaries.68
Apart from the C and F regions, we observed notable peaks for the KFSA and DMSF samples in the S 2p3/2 region (Fig. 7g), while no peak was observed in the case of DESF. These peaks are associated with moieties including –SOxF, –SO2–, –S(O)–, and elemental S.69,70 S structures found in the SEI are derived from the fluorosulfonamide structure, further suggesting their decomposition at the graphite surface and potential influence on the improved cycling performance as others have suggested.9,35,36 The N 1s region also suggested differences in the decomposition of each additive, where a N peak was only observed for the KFSA additive (Fig. 7h). We did not observe significant N content for the DMSF or DESF samples using XPS (Fig. 7h). Differences in decomposition of DMSF and DESF may lead to the formation of products that are soluble in the electrolyte or gaseous. The results of GC/MS analysis of reactions of DESF and DMSF with K metal showed additional peaks in the chromatogram that matched N-containing structures (Fig. S24 and S25†). Overall, the XPS results highly suggest significant differences in the SEI composition due to the impact of each of the additives with small changes in the additive structures leading to different surface reactions and incorporation into the SEI.
While XPS analyzes only a few nm into the electrode surface structure, other methods can be used to evaluate deeper into the SEI. The use of an ion beam to etch the SEI to collect depth profiling has recently been applied for evaluating the SEI of KPF6 and KFSA electrolytes.71 Alternatively, hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) using higher energy X-rays can be applied for surface analysis at depths >10 nm.61,72 Here, we utilized HAXPES measurements to further evaluate the surface structure of electrodes cycled with DMSF. The photoelectron intensities were again aligned to the sp2 C peak at 284.4 eV. In the C 1s HAXPES spectrum (Fig. S26†) for the DMSF sample, we further observed a variety of C structures similar to the XPS measurements. Deconvolution of the additive-free cell showed fewer peaks and more extensive coverage by carbonyl/potassium carboxylates species compared with the DMSF additive. These data suggest the formation of a thinner SEI when adding DMSF to the electrolyte like previous reports with KFSA.9,35 In line with a previous study using depth profiling, our HAXPES results show that the additive-free KPF6 electrolyte leads to a high content of alkyl carbonates while adding DMSF reduces the alkyl carbonate content toward ester-type structures and a thinner SEI.71 For the N 1s region of the HAXPES analysis, we again did not observe notable N content in the HAXPES spectrum for cells containing DMSF (Fig. S27†); though a clear S peak was observed (Fig. S28†). This S peak was not observed when the electrode was left soaking in the DMSF electrolyte; therefore, the observed S peak is derived from electrochemical decomposition and deposition on the graphite electrode. Altogether, the HAXPES analysis confirmed an altered SEI composition when adding DMSF and suggests a decomposition process that does not lead to incorporation of the N-group into the SEI structure.
Lastly, we applied density functional theory (DFT) calculations to gain insight into the stability and reactivity of the fluorosulfonamide-type additives. For this, we used Gaussian 09W with the B3LYP functional and 6-31G(d,p) basis set to optimize the structures and calculate the HOMO and LUMO of the additives (DMSF, DESF, FSA−), electrolyte (PF6−), and solvent (EC and DEC) species. For all simulations, we evaluated the isolated molecules using acetonitrile as the solvation model. As shown in Fig. 8a, our calculations indicated that all three additives had similar LUMO and HOMO energies with DMSF showing the lowest LUMO and HOMO. For all the additives, the LUMO energy was at a lower energy level than the solvent and PF6− anion, suggesting that they would preferentially undergo reduction at the graphite surface prior to the solvent and electrolyte. However, we emphasize that the LUMO energy does not necessarily define the reduction potential and other effects might not be captured by our model.73,74 These results are in-line with our dQ − dV analyses and evidences the likely impact of each additive on formation of the SEI initial structure and properties. The LUMO molecular orbitals (Fig. 8b, c and S29†) indicated reduction occurring around the S atom, while the HOMO orbitals (Fig. S30†) suggest oxidation at N for all of the additives. When considering the SEI formation process, a wide variety of decomposition reactions can occur with some of the reactions resulting in products that incorporate into the SEI. At the same time, additive decomposition could result in highly soluble or gaseous products that do not incorporate into to the SEI. While decomposition of the fluorosulfonyl moiety may result in similar SEI components (e.g. KF, SOxF, etc.), the N-containing portion of each additive is unique and could decompose to different products for each additive. In the case of FSA−, we observed incorporation of N-containing species in the SEI. For DMSF and DESF, the N-containing decomposition products may be soluble species that dissolve back into the electrolyte which are not observed with surface analyses. This poses some opportunities for future studies to tune the N side of the fluorosulfonamide-structure to change the resulting products during formation of the SEI. By influencing the components at the surface, the SEI structure likely could be altered for improved stability and performance.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ta06926a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |