Open Access Article
Morgane
Callon‡
*a,
Dominique
Luder
a,
Alexander A.
Malär‡§
a,
Thomas
Wiegand¶||
a,
Václav
Římal
a,
Lauriane
Lecoq
b,
Anja
Böckmann
b,
Ago
Samoson
c and
Beat H.
Meier
*a
aPhysical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: morgane.callon@phys.chem.ethz.ch; beme@ethz.ch
bMolecular Microbiology and Structural Biochemistry (MMSB) UMR 5086, CNRS, Université de Lyon, Labex Ecofect, 7 passage du Vercors, 69367 Lyon, France
cInstitute of Cybernetics, Spin Design Laboratory, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
First published on 20th September 2023
The NMR spectra of side-chain protons in proteins provide important information, not only about their structure and dynamics, but also about the mechanisms that regulate interactions between macromolecules. However, in the solid-state, these resonances are particularly difficult to resolve, even in relatively small proteins. We show that magic-angle-spinning (MAS) frequencies of 160 kHz, combined with a high magnetic field of 1200 MHz proton Larmor frequency, significantly improve their spectral resolution. We investigate in detail the gain for MAS frequencies between 110 and 160 kHz MAS for a model sample as well as for the hepatitis B viral capsid assembled from 120 core-protein (Cp) dimers. For both systems, we found a significantly improved spectral resolution of the side-chain region in the 1H–13C 2D spectra. The combination of 160 kHz MAS frequency with a magnetic field of 1200 MHz, allowed us to assign 61% of the aliphatic protons of Cp. The side-chain proton assignment opens up new possibilities for structural studies and further characterization of protein–protein or protein–nucleic acid interactions.
In solid-state NMR spectroscopy, the proton line width consists of a homogeneous contribution, an inhomogeneous one and a chemical exchange part: Δtot = Δhomo + Δinhomo + Δexch. In the following we assume that the possible contribution from chemical exchange27 is negligible here. We also neglect the contribution of 1H–1H J-couplings which are typically below 15 Hz but can give rise to a (non-resolved) multiplet pattern that contributes to the linewidth.
The inhomogeneous line width is due to magnetic-field heterogeneity and inherent sample heterogeneities, and is largely independent of the spinning frequency, but increases at higher magnetic fields due to the higher chemical shift dispersion. The homogeneous line width consists of a coherent and an incoherent part (Δhomo = Δcoh + Δincoh, assuming Lorentzian lines). The incoherent part is due to transverse relaxation caused by protein dynamics or to chemical exchange, and is acting, albeit differently, both in solution and in solid-state NMR experiments. The coherent contribution, on the other hand, is specific to solid-state NMR, and arises from the anisotropic interactions (dipolar coupling and cross terms with chemical shift anisotropy, CSA) that are not fully averaged by MAS at finite MAS frequencies, as predicted by average Hamiltonian theory (AHT).28–30 Thus, in order to reduce the homogeneous line width to become similar to the “natural” line width given by the transverse relaxation, one must decrease the coherent contribution. This contribution was experimentally found to decrease with the inverse spinning frequency in a polynomial manner, containing a linear and a quadratic contribution.31–33 For the amide protons of a fully protonated protein, a 19% reduction of the line width was shown when spinning 26% faster (from 100 to 126 kHz MAS), and a further reduction by 25% when increasing the spinning frequency to 150 kHz.31,33 The side-chain protons, which are in a relatively strong coupling regime, exhibit a larger homogeneous line width at a given spinning frequency than Hα or HN. Higher magnetic field has the potential to further reduce their line width by increasing the chemical-shift differences leading to a weaker coupling regime.7 We show how the combination of high magnetic field, at 1200 MHz proton Larmor frequency, and fast MAS at 160 kHz frequency, positively affects the proton line widths, and allows proton side-chain resonance assignments of the HBV capsid core protein (Cp149). We first evaluate this gain in resolution on a model system, the phosphorylated amino acid O-phospho-L-serine. Then, we investigate the line widths of the side-chain resonances of Cp149. While the 1HN,13C,15N assignments have been determined previously,34 we assigned, combining fast spinning at 160 kHz and high magnetic field, 61% of the Hα and side-chain proton resonances using three-dimensional 1H-detected spectra.
800g for 3 h at 4 °C. The fractions containing UL-Cp149 were further purified by (NH4)2SO4 precipitation (up to 35% saturation) and finally dialyzed in the solid-state-NMR buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM DTT) overnight at 4 °C. 20 μL of saturated 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid (DSS) solution were added to the protein for chemical-shift referencing prior to the sedimentation step. Sub-milligram amounts of capsids were filled into a 0.5 mm rotor using home-made filling tools35 by centrifugation (200
000g, 17 h, 4 °C).
relaxation experiments with echo-delay time varied from 0.002 to 6 ms and 0.001 to 10 ms respectively were measured. No cooling was applied during the measurement of the O-phospho-L-ser spectra, thus the sample temperature increased with increasing MAS frequency according to the Fig. S1.†
Solid-state NMR spectra of UL-Cp149 were recorded on capsids sedimented36,37 in H2O and internally referenced to DSS. The spectra were acquired using 0.5 mm triple-resonance probe heads and spinning frequencies of 110 and 160 kHz MAS. The sample temperature of around 25 °C was determined from the relation T (°C) = 455 − 90δH2O where δH2O denotes the supernatant water chemical shift in ppm.35 The sample temperature was kept constant at 25 °C at all MAS frequencies by using an air-cooling system which compensates the MAS sample heating due to fast sample rotation shown in Fig. S1.†
The 2D-hCH experiments were recorded with 800 μs cross-polarization (CP) transfers. For the residue-specific measurement of the homogeneous line width, eight 2D-hCH
relaxation experiments with echo-delay times up to 4.5 ms were measured at 110 and 160 kHz MAS frequency and 1200 MHz proton frequency. Bulk proton longitudinal relaxation times T1 (1H) have been determined using a saturation recovery sequence with 16 variable delays up to 7 and 8 s for the HN/aliphatic protons (1Hali) respectively. Bulk proton transverse relaxation times
have been determined using a Hahn-echo sequence with 16 variable echo delays τecho from 1 μs to 6/7 ms for the HN/1Hali respectively. Bulk proton relaxation times under spin lock T1ρ(1H) have been determined with 10 variable spin lock times from 1 μs to 40 ms (1H spin lock rf-field strength of 13 kHz). Bulk 15N transverse relaxation times
have been determined using a Hahn-echo sequence with 16 variable echo delays τecho from 1 μs to 35 ms. The 3D-hNCH experiment was recorded with 20 ms Cα-N cross-polarization (CP) transfers. The 3D-hCCH TOBSY experiment used a C957 block38 for the TOBSY mixing of 15 ms (see puse program in Fig. S2†) and was recorded using the simultaneous acquisition of a frequency reference (SAFR).39,44 As well, additional 3D-hCCH and 3D-HcCH TOBSY experiments were recorded using a WALTZ-16 bloc40 for the TOBSY transfer with 30 kHz rf amplitude and with a length of 11 ms. The inter-scan delay for the experiments has been set to the value of 1.27T1(1Hali) based on the measured bulk protein T1(1Hali) relaxation time. All experiments use the MISSISSIPPI scheme41 for solvent suppression, WALTZ-64 heteronuclear decoupling on 13C during 1H acquisition40,42 and frequency-sweep low-power TPPM decoupling on 1H during indirect time increments in 2D and 3D experiments.43 Detailed information about all acquisition parameters can be found in Tables S1–S4.†
The spectra were processed using Topspin 4.0.6 (Bruker Biospin). The O-phospho-L-serine spectra were processed without apodization function and calibrated using an external calibration on the 13C spectra of solid adamantane recorded in the same probe head directly after the measurement. The UL-Cp149 spectra were processed with zero filling to the double amount of data points and a shifted sine-bell apodization function in direct and indirect dimensions with SSB = 2.5. Pre-existing 13C resonance assignments were transferred from Lecoq et al.34 (BMRB accession number 27317). The spectra were analyzed in CcpNmr Analysis 2.4.2.44,45
(1H) relaxation times were extracted from a series of 1D 1H spin-echo experiments, where the peak areas have been determined using the relaxation analysis tool in Topspin and exported to MATLAB (version 9.6.0). Relaxation curves were fitted with a mono-exponential decay function with two free parameters and functional form A
exp(−τecho/t) and are shown in Fig. S3 and S4.† For UL-Cp149, site-specific
(1H) relaxation times were extracted from a series of 2D-hCH
relaxation experiments, using the spectral fitting package INFOS.46 Relaxation curves were fitted with a mono-exponential fit and are shown for all resonances in Fig. S5 and S6.† Site-specific homogeneous line widths have been determined using the relation
. Experimental errors σ have been determined using bootstrapping methods with 200 iterations for relaxation time data and subsequent Gaussian error propagation for the error on the corresponding homogeneous line widths. For O-phospho-L-serine, the MAS dependence of the homogeneous line widths Δhomo(1H) were fitted by a quadratic polynomial model of the form Δhomo(νr) = c(1) + c(2)/νr + c(3)/νr2, with the spinning frequency νr, forcing the y-axis intercept to go through the origin (c(1) = 0). For UL-Cp149 bulk relaxation measurement, relaxation times were extracted from a series of 1D hcH and hnH experiments, where the peak areas have been determined using the relaxation analysis tool in Topspin and exported to MATLAB. Relaxation curves were fitted with a mono-exponential decay function with two free parameters and functional form A
exp(−τecho/t) and are shown in Fig. S7.† For UL-Cp149, site-specific total line widths were extracted from series of 2D-hCH CP-based spectra using the spectral fitting package INFOS.46 For O-phospho-L-serine, the site-specific total line widths were determined using the line-shape integrated tool in Topspin (Bruker). The 1D spectra are fitted using a mixed Lorentzian and Gaussian function and the full-widths at half maximum (FWHM) corresponding to the total line width is extracted.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Proton line width as a function of MAS frequency for O-phospho-L-serine. Comparison between 1D 1H spectra recorded at MAS frequencies from 40 to 160 kHz and at (a) 850 MHz proton frequency and (b) 1200 MHz proton frequency. The proton resonances are labeled according to the chemical structure of O-phospho-L-serine in the figure. Note that the 1D spectra were not fully relaxed, explaining the intensity difference. (c) Resonance-specific homogeneous line width (Δhomo(1H)) as a function of the rotor period τr = 1/νr and corresponding quadratic fits of the experimental data measured at 850 MHz (dashed lines) and 1200 MHz (solid lines) proton Larmor frequency at MAS frequencies of 60 to 160 and 100 to 160 kHz MAS frequency respectively (fits shown in Fig S3 and S4†). The MAS frequency is shown on the upper axis. Error bars are calculated as described in the Materials and methods section and given as 2σ. At 60 kHz MAS frequency and 850 MHz proton frequency, the two protons of the CH2 group are not resolved enough to be measured individually. A zoom on the proton resonances of the CH2 group (Hβ2 and Hβ3) is shown in (d) to illustrate the similar line width obtained by spinning 20 kHz faster or going to a higher magnetic field. | ||
To evaluate the homogeneous contribution to the total line width,
was extracted from the Hahn-echo 1D 1H spectra. Fig. 1c shows the Δhomo(1H) dependence with τr = 1/νr and the homogeneous line widths at 850 and 1200 MHz are given respectively in Tables 1 and 2. For both magnetic fields, the proton line widths always benefit from a faster MAS frequency. The homogenous line width improvement when going from 100 to 160 kHz spinning frequency is shown to be greatest for the CH2 group protons (Hβ2 and Hβ3, more than a factor of two). Indeed, at MAS frequencies of 160 kHz, their homogeneous line width becomes comparable to that of the H and Hα protons (see Table 2 at 1200 MHz). Fig. 1c shows that, for all protons, the homogeneous line width, Δhomo(1H), is always lower at 1200 MHz (solid lines) than at 850 MHz (dotted lines) (see also Table 1). This effect is more pronounced for the protons of the CH2 group.
| MAS frequ./kHz | Δ homo(H′)/Hz | Δ homo(Hγ)/Hz | Δ homo(H)/Hz | Δ homo(Hα)/Hz | Δ homo(Hβ2)/Hz | Δ homo(Hβ3)/Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160 | 32 ± 2 | 26 ± 2 | 84 ± 4 | 125 ± 8 | 124 ± 6 | 94 ± 6 |
| 150 | 36 ± 2 | 30 ± 2 | 92 ± 3 | 119 ± 7 | 133 ± 7 | 105 ± 6 |
| 140 | 39 ± 2 | 34 ± 2 | 98 ± 4 | 131 ± 7 | 146 ± 7 | 121 ± 7 |
| 130 | 44 ± 2 | 38 ± 2 | 107 ± 4 | 146 ± 8 | 163 ± 7 | 139 ± 7 |
| 120 | 49 ± 2 | 44 ± 2 | 118 ± 4 | 160 ± 30 | 184 ± 8 | 159 ± 7 |
| 110 | 58 ± 3 | 52 ± 2 | 130 ± 4 | 194 ± 18 | 214 ± 9 | 188 ± 8 |
| 100 | 62 ± 3 | 57 ± 3 | 144 ± 5 | 203 ± 10 | 241 ± 9 | 220 ± 8 |
| 80 | 84 ± 3 | 80 ± 3 | 185 ± 5 | 267 ± 12 | 337 ± 11 | 317 ± 11 |
| 60 | 114 ± 4 | 115 ± 3 | 248 ± 7 | 415 ± 16 | — | — |
| MAS frequ./kHz | Δ homo (H′)/Hz | Δ homo (Hγ)/Hz | Δ homo (H)/Hz | Δ homo (Hα)/Hz | Δ homo (Hβ2)/Hz | Δ homo (Hβ3)/Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160 | 36 ± 2 | 30 ± 2 | 86 ± 4 | 105 ± 5 | 104 ± 7 | 74 ± 4 |
| 150 | 39 ± 2 | 33 ± 2 | 93 ± 3 | 112 ± 5 | 120 ± 7 | 80 ± 5 |
| 140 | 43 ± 3 | 36 ± 3 | 100 ± 3 | 115 ± 5 | 129 ± 8 | 91 ± 5 |
| 130 | 47 ± 2 | 40 ± 3 | 108 ± 4 | 130 ± 6 | 144 ± 9 | 106 ± 6 |
| 120 | 52 ± 2 | 44 ± 3 | 118 ± 4 | 136 ± 6 | 162 ± 9 | 123 ± 7 |
| 110 | 57 ± 3 | 49 ± 3 | 130 ± 4 | 155 ± 7 | 179 ± 10 | 148 ± 7 |
| 100 | 64 ± 3 | 57 ± 3 | 145 ± 4 | 164 ± 9 | 204 ± 11 | 175 ± 9 |
Finally, a comparison of the MAS-frequency dependence shows that it is possible to obtain a similar proton homogeneous line width at 850 MHz as at 1200 MHz, by spinning about 20 kHz faster. This is illustrated in Fig. 1d, which shows that for the proton resonances of the CH2 group, the homogeneous line widths at 160 kHz and 850 MHz for Hβ2 and Hβ3 are 124 ± 6 Hz and 94 ± 6 Hz, respectively, close to what would be obtained at 140 kHz and 1200 MHz, 129 ± 8 Hz and 91 ± 5 kHz, respectively (Tables 1 and 2).
Taken together, the proton line widths benefit from both a faster MAS frequency and a higher magnetic field. In addition, the experimental CH2 proton homogeneous line width remains to be described over the extended range up to 160 kHz MAS by a sum of a linear and a quadratic function of 1/νr. A further linewidth improvement is expected for MAS frequencies above 160 kHz as, indeed, for the two CH2 resonances at 1200 MHz, the total line width (118 ± 7 and 128 ± 12 Hz, Table S5†) is still dominated by the homogeneous contribution (74 ± 7 and 104 ± 7 Hz, Table 2).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 The gain in resolution at faster spinning and higher field in UL-Cp149 spectra. (a) Aliphatic regions of 2D-hCH UL-Cp149 spectra recorded at 160 kHz (red) and 110 kHz (orange) MAS frequency and 1200 MHz proton frequency and 160 kHz (blue) and 110 kHz (cyan) MAS frequency and 850 MHz proton frequency. (b) Corresponding 1D traces at the positions indicated in the 2D spectra with dashed lines. (c) Corresponding boxplot statistics of the site-specific line width of 87 peaks from the spectra in (a). The 87 peaks (Fig. S9†) were selected for evaluation are resolved in all four spectra. The thick lines in each box represent the median total proton line width (Δtot(1H)), the box areas range from the 25th to the 75th percentile and the error bars cover the 95% confidence interval. (d) 1D-1H projections of the 2D-hCH spectra recorded at a magnetic field of 850 MHz and (e) 1D-1H projections of the 2D-hCH spectra recorded at 1200 MHz proton frequency. | ||
Already the inspection of the spectra in Fig. 2a allows one to appreciate the gain in resolution obtained by faster spinning and higher field, which is also clearly visible in the corresponding extracted 1D traces in Fig. 2b. To quantify this gain, we extracted the total proton line width from a selection of peaks picked in the 2D-hCH CP-based spectra. We selected 87 peaks that are resolved in all four spectra (peaks shown in Fig. S9†). The MAS frequency dependence of the line width is illustrated by the median total proton line width (Δtot(1H)) which improves at 1200 MHz from 207 ± 9 Hz at 110 kHz to 176 ± 7 Hz at 160 kHz MAS frequency (thick lines in Fig. 2c). At 850 MHz, Δtot(1H) improves from 237 ± 14 Hz at 110 kHz to 186 ± 8 Hz at 160 kHz MAS frequency. Thus, between 110 and 160 kHz, we observe an improvement in the total proton line width of 18% at 1200 MHz and 27% at 850 MHz. In addition, the gain in sensitivity can be seen by comparing the 1D 1H projections of the 2D-hCH spectra (Fig. 2d and e). This is due to the reduction in line width at faster spinning, but is also offset by the reduction in CP transfer performance at higher MAS frequency.53 At 1200 MHz, a gain in SNR of a factor of 1.16 is observed by spinning at 160 kHz compared to 110 kHz, while at 850 MHz the gain is 1.5. Moving to a higher magnetic field at constant spinning frequency (160 kHz) also improves the spectral resolution, as shown by comparing Δtot((H)1H), from 186 ± 8 Hz at 850 MHz to 176 ± 7 Hz at 1200 MHz. The combination of faster spinning and higher magnetic field made it possible to achieve a significant reduction in the total proton line width, by a total of 35%. This is likely to enable for proton side-chain resonance assignments in many large proteins, and highlights the added benefit of combining faster MAS with higher magnetic fields.
, which is a measure of the homogenous line width, should increase. This is indeed the case for the bulk
of UL-Cp149, as shown in Fig. S7 and Table S6.† We measured in addition bulk rotating-frame proton relaxation times T1ρ((H)1H), as well as longitudinal relaxation T1(1H). Both relaxation times lengthen with increasing MAS frequency and magnetic field, as expected, for amide and aliphatic protons (Fig. S7 and Table S6†).
To go further, we measured site-specific transverse relaxation times of the aliphatic protons of UL-Cp149 using 2D-hCH
relaxation experiments at MAS frequencies of 110 and 160 kHz at 1200 MHz proton frequency. We recorded eight 2D-hCH
spectra at different echo times, with the spectra recorded at 0.001 ms shown in Fig. S5 and S6† for 160 kHz and 110 kHz, respectively. The 51 residues shown in blue in Fig. S9† were selected because they are resolved and assigned in both spectra. For each of the peaks, the relaxation decay was fitted with a mono-exponential function (shown in Fig. S5 and S6†). The site-specific
are listed in Table S7† and the median relaxation times summarized in Table 3. Comparing the median
between 110 and 160 kHz reveals an increase in relaxation times of about 50% when going to faster spinning. The longest
are found for methyl protons (CH3) and Hα protons.
relaxation times and Δhomo(1H) of UL-Cp149 aliphatic protons recorded at 1200 MHz proton frequency and spinning frequencies of 110 and 160 kHz. The spectral regions are defined by type of protons, with the CH3 spectral region between δ(13C) = 16.8–26.0 ppm, the CH2 spectral region between δ(13C) = 26.0–51.4 ppm and the Hα spectral region between δ(13C) = 51.4–70.0 ppm. Experimental errors (σ) are calculated as described in the Materials and methods section
We then extracted the site-specific homogeneous line width of the aliphatic protons,
, from the measured
relaxation times of the 51 residues, at 160 and 110 kHz MAS frequency. The site-specific homogeneous proton line widths are shown in Fig. 3a and b respectively and listed in Table S7.† As for the model compound, the median homogeneous line width decreases at higher MAS frequencies, from 77 ± 16 at 110 to 50 ± 7 Hz at 160 kHz MAS frequency, corresponding to a reduction of a factor 1.5. This is close to the expected improvement which corresponds to the inverse ratio of the spinning frequencies, 160 kHz/110 kHz = 1.4.
Thus, the reduction of the homogeneous line width is higher than the reduction of the total line width (reduction by a factor of about 1.2, see above). This is due to the larger inhomogeneous than homogeneous contribution to the total line width, which is independent of the spinning frequency. Thus, we conclude that the dominant contribution to the total line width at 160 kHz comes from the inhomogeneous contributions (median Δinhomo = Δtot − Δhomo = 126 Hz, for the selected 51 residues). It accounts in UL-Cp149 for two-thirds of the total line width and limits the amount of improvement that can be achieved by spinning even faster. One should note that Cp149 has four different molecules in the asymmetric unit, resulting in some resonances being split into four resolved peaks3 and, for other resonances, unresolved peak quadrupling might contribute to, or even dominate, the inhomogeneous line width in this sample. Note that the homogeneous line width is larger for the CH2 spins than for the Hα or CH3 (Table 3) due to the stronger dipolar coupling they experience. For these spin systems, the advantage of going to a higher field and spinning faster is more pronounced.
Fig. 4 shows extracted planes of the 3D-hCCH TOBSY-C9 spectrum of UL-Cp149 recorded at 1200 MHz proton frequency and 160 kHz MAS frequency. The assignment strategy for assigning the aliphatic protons using the 3D-hCCH spectrum is shown for residue 22D. Based on the known 13C assignments from Lecoq et al.34 the resonance in the CC plane resulting from one-bond TOBSY magnetization transfer could be assigned, identifying the bound aliphatic proton. Following this strategy, the Hα (4.62 ppm), Hβ1 (3.02 ppm) and Hβ2 (2.65 ppm) resonances of 22D could be assigned thanks to their corresponding carbon assignment (Fig. 4).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 3D-hCCH TOBSY-C9 spectrum of UL-Cp149 recorded at 160 kHz MAS frequency and 1200 MHz proton frequency. Selected 2D-hCCh and hcCH planes are shown. An example of assignment of Hα of residue 22D is represented with blue arrows where the known carbon chemical shifts34 served as basis to assign the bound protons. | ||
In total, 61% of the aliphatic protons could be assigned, including 81% of Hα and 52% of the CH2 and CH3 groups (see Fig. S13†). Note that the protons marked with an asterisk in Fig. S13† could not be assigned, because their directly bonded carbon had not been assigned previously. They are however taken into account in calculating the percentages. Furthermore, the fastest spinning allows to resolve the two diastereotopic proton resonances in about half of the assigned CH2 groups. This is shown as an example in Fig. 4, where the two beta proton resonances of 22D (Hβ1 and Hβ2) are resolved in the hcCH plane of the 3D-hCCH TOBSY spectrum. The total assignment is shown in the 2D-hCH spectrum of UL-Cp149 in Fig. 5 below.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 2D-hCH spectrum of UL-Cp149 measured at 160 kHz MAS frequency and 1200 MHz proton frequency, with aliphatic proton assignments obtained from the 3D-hNCH and hCCH experiments. | ||
The combination of spinning at 160 kHz MAS frequency combined with high magnetic field of 1200 MHz proton Larmor frequency allowed us to assign 61% of the aliphatic protons of the HBV capsid protein and 67% of aliphatic protons having a directly bonded carbon assigned.
This information is crucial as these protons are often located at protein interfaces and their observation will further allow to characterize interactions between proteins, or to nucleic acids or small ligands. We conclude that 1H-detected MAS-NMR at spinning frequencies of 160 kHz and faster allows the resolution of protein side-chain resonances in fully protonated systems which carry crucial information through the contacts they make at protein–protein, protein–drug or protein–RNA (DNA) interfaces.
Footnotes |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3sc03539e |
| ‡ These authors contributed equally. |
| § Present address: Fraunhofer Headquarters, Hansastr. 27c, 80686 Munich, Germany. |
| ¶ Present address: Institute of Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 2, 52074 Aachen, Germany. |
| || Present address: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Stiftstr. 34-36, 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |