View PDF VersionPrevious ArticleNext Article

Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
DOI: 10.1039/D3RE90004E (Correction) React. Chem. Eng., 2023, 8, 732-733

Correction: C–H activation and subsequent C–C bond formation in rigid alkenes catalyzed by Ru(III) metallates

S. Dharani a, G. Kalaiarasi a, Vincent M. Lynch b, K. Srinivasan c and R. Prabhakaran *a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641046, India. E-mail: rpnchemist@gmail.com
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1224, USA
cDepartment of Physics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641046, India

Received 18th January 2023 , Accepted 18th January 2023

First published on 26th January 2023

Abstract

Correction for ‘C–H activation and subsequent C–C bond formation in rigid alkenes catalyzed by Ru(III) metallates’ by S. Dharani et al., React. Chem. Eng., 2023, 8, 164–174, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RE00317A.

The authors regret that several incorrect values were input into Tables 1 and 2 in the original manuscript. The corrected Tables 1 and 2 are as shown below.
Table 1 Crystallographic data of the ligand HL2 and complexes RuL1 and RuL2
  HL2 RuL1 RuL2
Empirical formula C14H17N3O2S C23H28N3O6RuS C24H30N3O6RuS
Formula weight 291.36 575.61 589.64
Temperature 100(2) K 100(2) K 100(2) K
Wavelength 0.7107 Å 1.5418 Å 1.5418 Å
Crystal system Orthorhombic Triclinic Triclinic
Space group Pbca P[1 with combining macron] P[1 with combining macron]
Unit cell dimensions
a 13.021(2) Å 9.247(4) Å 8.641(2) Å
b 10.688(2) Å 11.966(4) Å 12.432(5) Å
c 20.554(3) Å 11.968(5) Å 13.006(7) Å
α 90° 63.486(4)° 63.222(5)°
β 90° 87.750(3)° 82.336(3)°
γ 90° 86.958(3)° 86.701(3)°
Volume 2860.5(8) Å3 1183.2(9) Å3 1236.3(10) Å3
Z 8 2 2
Density 1.353 Mg m−3 1.616 Mg m−3 1.584 Mg m−3
Absorption coefficient 0.231 mm−1 6.575 mm−1 6.307 mm−1
F(000) 1232 590 606
θ range for data collection 2.525 to 28.351° 4.094 to 72.914° 3.963 to 73.132°
Limiting indices −17 ≤ h ≤ 17, −13 ≤ k ≤ 14, −27 ≤ l ≤ 27 −11 ≤ h ≤9, −14 ≤ k ≤ 14, −14 ≤ l ≤ 14 −10 ≤ h ≤ 10, −12 ≤ k ≤ 15, −16 ≤ l ≤ 16
Reflections collected 50[thin space (1/6-em)]114 13[thin space (1/6-em)]457 14[thin space (1/6-em)]034
Independent reflections 3579 [R(int) = 0.0759] 4639 [R(int) = 0.0224] 4852 [R(int) = 0.0290]
Absorption correction Semi-empirical from equivalents Gaussian and multi scan Gaussian and multi scan
Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2 Full-matrix least-squares on F2 Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters 3579/49/215 4639/0/317 4852/0/326
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.044 1.038 1.037
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R 1 = 0.0529, wR2 = 0.1417 R 1 = 0.0266, wR2 = 0.0687 R 1 = 0.0227, wR2 = 0.0578
R indices (all data) R 1 = 0.0819, wR2 = 0.1269 R 1 = 0.0273, wR2 = 0.0693 R 1 = 0.0243, wR2 = 0.0590

Table 2 Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of the ligand HL2 and the Ru(III) complexes RuL1 and RuL2
Bond lengths HL2 RuL1 RuL2
O(1)–C(1) 1.258(03) — —
N(1)–C(1) 1.405(03) — —
N(1)–N(2) 1.369(03) 1.406(03) 1.405(02)
S(1)–C(4) 1.654(03) — —
N(3)–C(4) 1.488(07) — —
Ru(1)–N(1) — 2.011(18) 2.000(15)
Ru(1)–S(1) — 2.329(06) 2.337(05)
Ru(1)–O(3) — 2.012(15) 2.023(13)
Ru(1)–O(4) — 2.065(15) 2.018(13)
Ru(1)–O(5) — 2.022(15) 2.061(13)
Ru(1)–O(6) — 2.025(16) 2.016(13)
 
Bond angles
N(1)–Ru(1)–S(1) — 84.61(5) 83.32(4)
S(1)–Ru(1)–O(3) — 89.81(5) 93.31(4)
O(3)–Ru(1)–O(6) — 88.37(6) 179.05(5)
O(6)–Ru(1)–O(4) — 86.82(7) 88.26(5)
O(4)–Ru(1)–O(5) — 87.65(6) 86.43(5)
O(5)–Ru(1)–N(1) — 89.86(7) 98.06(6)
O(3)–Ru(1)–O(4) — 91.98(6) 90.87(5)
O(5)–Ru(1)–S(1) — 90.52(5) 178.55(4)
O(5)–Ru(1)–O(6) — 90.29(6) 93.34(5)
O(6)–Ru(1)–S(1) — 91.06(5) 87.12(4)
N(1)–Ru(1)–O(3) — 91.51(7) 90.75(6)
N(1)–Ru(1)–O(4) — 97.51(7) 175.32(5)
N(1)–Ru(1)–O(6) — 175.67(7) 90.14(6)
S(1)–Ru(1)–O(4) — 177.19(4) 92.21(4)
O(3)–Ru(1)–O(5) — 178.62(6) 86.22(5)

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologizes for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023