Open Access Article
Basmah Al-Jammal‡
a,
Buthaina Hussein‡§
*b,
Yusuf Al-Hiariab,
Tareq Al-Qirimb,
Manal Al-Najdawic,
Lama Hamadnehd,
Mohammad Alwahshb and
Balqis Ikhmaisb
aDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences/Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman-11942, Jordan
bFaculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman-17138, Jordan. E-mail: Buthina.hussein@zuj.edu.jo
cFaculty of Pharmacy, Isra University, Amman-11622, Jordan
dDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan
First published on 24th July 2023
The hypolipidemic effect of furan carboxamide derivatives was investigated using the Triton WR-1339 rat model. Nineteen compounds were synthesized, including furan-2-carboxamides of benzophenones and acetophenones (a(1–4)), anilines and amine derivatives (a(5–9)), picolinic-2-carboxamide derivatives of benzophenones and acetophenone (a(10–12)) and furan-2-carboxylate esters of benzophenones and acetophenones, substituted phenols and alcohols (b(1–7)). All the necessary steps were taken to synthesize, purify, and characterize these compounds. They were synthesized by reacting acyl chlorides of the heterocycles with their corresponding amines in the presence of pyridine and tert-butyl acetate. While the conventional heating method yielded acceptable yields for some of the reactions under reflux, the microwave synthesis reactor achieved significantly higher yields for others. Rats with hyperlipidemia were induced with Triton WR-1339 and then subjected to in vivo testing via an intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg kg−1 Triton WR-1339. The model was tested using an oral dose of bezafibrate (100 mg kg−1). After 7 hours of treatment with Triton, the new derivatives represented by compounds a(1–2), a(4–5), a7, and a(10–12) showed significant activity against the complete lipid profile, including a decrease in triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma levels. At 20 mg kg−1 dose, these compounds were superior to other lipid-lowering agents in reducing triglyceride levels and slightly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. These results indicate a mutual mechanism of action of novel compounds with fibrates, where they have a marked effect on triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; for example, a5 causes a significant reduction (p 0.0001) of triglyceride levels by 86%, and a remarkable increase (p 0.0001) in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma levels by 65% as compared to hyperlipidemic rats.
All compounds were evaluated by Triton WR-1339-induced hyperlipidemic rats, a well-known model used in screening new agents with a potential lipid-lowering activity, Fig. 2.8–15
As compared with the standard control group (NG) in Fig. 2, Triton WR-1339 leads to a remarkable increase in triglyceride (TG) (p < 0.0001) and total cholesterol (TC) (p < 0.0001) plasma concentrations when measured 7 h after Triton intraperitoneal injection (i.p.). More than six folds and TC increased the plasma TG by 1.5 folds. On the other hand, Triton WR-1339 reduce HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) plasma levels by 0.75 fold (p < 0.0001). The Hyperlipidemic group (HG) group has also revealed that LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) increased significantly by two folds (p < 0.0001) after 7 h from Triton injection. Fig. 2 confirmed the model's validity, where the control group, the hyperlipidemic rats treated with bezafibrate (BZF), showed a significant reduction of TG and LDL-C levels compared with the HG group. It also increased the HDL-C and TC levels.
The hypolipidemic activity of carboxamide derivatives was attributed to three essential components: a heterocyclic ring, a sizeable lipophilic moiety, and a carboxamide linker.15 The previous publications8–15 have focused on carboxamide as a linker with either benzophenone or anthraquinone substitutions.
Hikmat et al., 2017, initiated a preliminary investigation on only two furan carboxamide derivatives as antihyperlipidemic agents, Fig. 3. It was found that furan benzophenone exhibited excellent antihyperlipidemic activity.14
This initial investigation of furan, which considers similar isosteric heterocycles to indole, pyrole, and benzofuran, showed excellent antihyperlipidemic activity in our previous work,8–15 in addition to its small size as a ring, its flexibility compared to the previous heterocycle ring, and the established pharmacological importance and the wide diversity of biological activities exhibited by heterocyclic carboxamide derivatives prompted this search to synthesize furan as the heterocyclic system with amide or ester linkers and investigate their effects on the activity and explore different substituents in the lipophilic part (Scheme 1). On the other hand, three picolinic-2-carboxamide derivatives have been synthesized and tested in this work as an initial investigation of a new class of different heterocycle rings.
Procedure A, furan-2-carboxamide derivatives (a1–a9) were synthesized by coupling different amino benzophenones, acetophenones, aniline or alkyl amine to furan-2-carbonyl chloride (furoyl chloride) (2) (Scheme 2).16 Furoic acid (1) was converted to furoyl chloride (2) using thionyl chloride with toluene (solvent) under the fume hood for 30 h at reflux (90–100 °C). This reaction was time-consuming, giving low yields. Using oxalyl chloride did not improve the conditions or yields. Procedure A is based on conventional heating that consumes lots of starting materials and time, producing reasonable but not excellent yield. Therefore, a more efficient amide coupling method was necessary at this stage to produce higher yields. A microwave synthesis reactor (a more yielding and safer method) was attempted (procedure B) and compared to conventional heating as an alternative (Table 1). Using the same procedure of amide synthesis microwave conditions applied, the procedure involved adding 1 mole of the amine with pyridine and TEA, followed by adding two moles of furoyl chloride (2) in a specific glass vial (30 ml). The reactions occurred in a microwave synthesis reactor for 15 minutes at 50 or 80 °C. This purification was more straightforward, and the reaction yielded higher amounts of the desired amide compounds. The crude mixture was treated with a base in an aqueous system, followed by filtration and sometimes hot filtration to give pure products. Few reactions needed a recrystallization process but no chromatography. For Scheme 2 compounds a6, a11, b1, and b4 are novel while others are previously reported a1; a2, and a4,17 a3,18 a5; a10,19 a7,20 a8,21 a10,22 a12,23 b2,24 b3,25 b5,26 b6,27 b7.28
| Time | Temperature | Average yield | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional heating (A) | 24 hours | 80–100 °C | ≈40% |
| Microwave (B) | 15 minutes | 50 or 80 °C | ≈80% |
Picolinyl chloride (4) was prepared from picolinic acid (3) using thionyl chloride (SOCl2) and toluene under reflux (80 °C). Procedure B was used for the preparation of compounds a10 and a11. At the same time, compound a12 was prepared by reacting picolinoyl chloride (4) with 4-aminoacetophenone under reflux (90 °C) for 24 hours without any catalyst. Only dioxane was added as a solvent. The reaction furnished the product (a12) but with a low yield.
| Lipid profile | TG mg dl−1 | TC mg dl−1 | HDL-C mg dl−1 | LDL-C mg dl−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a Values are expressed as mean ± SEM from five rats in each group. NG, normal control group; HG, hyperlipidemic control group; BZF; bezafibrate control group, a1–a12, b1–b4, and b6–b7 + 4% DMSO for each compound, TC; total cholesterol, TG; triglyceride, HDL-C; high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C; low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. All compounds are compared with HG. HG is compared with NG.b p < 0.05.c p < 0.001.d p < 0.0001. | ||||
| NG | 55.2 ± 0.4 | 64.2 ± 0.8 | 41.2 ± 0.5 | 30 ± 0.35 |
| HG | 370 ± 3.2d | 94 ± 0.71d | 31.5 ± 0.36d | 62.2 ± 0.91d |
| BZF | 95.6 ± 1.8d | 125.3 ± 1.5 | 40.2 ± 1.3b | 56.0 ± 1.1 |
| a1 | 75.6 ± 1.2b | 89 ± 1.2b | 37.6 ± 0.41b | 31 ± 0.32b |
| a2 | 58.3 ± 0.9c | 85 ± 0.95c | 44 ± 0.65c | 27 ± 0.21c |
| a3 | 340 ± 2.8 | 96 ± 1.6 | 27 ± 0.21 | 61 ± 0.84 |
| a4 | 65 ± 0.78b | 83 ± 0.75b | 39 ± 0.12b | 33 ± 0.12b |
| a5 | 50.2 ± 1.3d | 74.5 ± 0.91d | 52 ± 0.47d | 25 ± 0.45d |
| a6 | 352 ± 4.6 | 110 ± 2.2 | 33 ± 0.66 | 67.4 ± 0.47 |
| a7 | 60.4 ± 0.85c | 81 ± 1.4c | 41 ± 0.28c | 29 ± 0.32c |
| a8 | 352.9 ± 9.5 | 92.7 ± 8.2 | 31.7 ± 3 | 63.4 ± 5 |
| a9 | 361.3 ± 7.3 | 91.6 ± 5.5 | 29.4 ± 8 | 59.1 ± 7.4 |
| a10 | 109.2 ± 4.7b | 88.7 ± 9.5b | 34.5 ± 10b | 38.6 ± 4.9b |
| a11 | 20.0 ± 2.2c | 62.2 ± 2.9c | 49.8 ± 6c | 21.2 ± 3.7c |
| a12 | 29.9 ± 4.7c | 68.8 ± 4.5c | 39.6 ± 6c | 26.12 ± 1.2c |
| b1 | 361 ± 4.1 | 93 ± 2.1 | 30 ± 0.31 | 59 ± 0.42 |
| b2 | 368 ± 4.3 | 97.3 ± 1.1 | 29 ± 0.45 | 64 ± 0.95 |
| b3 | 443 ± 2.1d | 96.2 ± 0.5d | 30.2 ± 0.22d | 71 ± 1.1d |
| b4 | 302 ± 1.1c | 81.6 ± 1.9c | 38 ± 0.51c | 56 ± 0.4c |
| b5 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| b6 | 421 ± 1.9b | 88.4 ± 1.2b | 32 ± 0.43b | 62.2 ± 0.8b |
| b7 | 390 ± 2.2c | 91.2 ± 1.5c | 33.2 ± 0.42c | 60.1 ± 1.1c |
Table 2 demonstrates the significant reduction in TG, TC, and LDL-C and the increase in HDL-C plasma levels after the treatment with compounds a1, a2, a4, a5, a7, a10, a11, and a12, with the most significant results relating to a11 at a minimal dose (20 mg kg−1).
Surprisingly enough, the active compounds at the dose of 68 μM (20 mg kg−1) and after 7 h of Triton injection have revealed activity against the complete lipid profile, including TG, TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C, with the most significant results regarding TG plasma levels, Fig. 4. These findings introduce a new hypolipidemic compound with synergistic action at low doses against the entire lipid profile for the first time. Bearing in mind that contrary to fibrates, they reduce TC levels (for example, bezafibrate (276 μM, 100 mg kg−1 body weight)). Unexpectedly, the active compounds significantly increased HDL levels, an essential issue in hyperlipidemia with no treatment yet. One agent only addresses this problem; niacin, usually used at high and toxic doses. Furthermore, despite increasing HDL levels by both niacin and sometimes fibrates such as gemfibrozil (Lopid) or certain statins, such as simvastatin (Zocor) and rosuvastatin (Crestor), these drugs have failed to protect the human body from heart attacks.
This pattern of activity is similar to the reported fibrates reduction pattern, which points out the mutual mechanism of action of the furan compounds with fibrates in that they have marked TG and HDL-C activity. It was reported that fibrates stimulate lipoprotein lipase gene expression.30 They stimulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), which controls the expression of gene products that mediate the metabolism of TGs and HDL. As a result, the synthesis of fatty acids, TGs, and VLDL is reduced, while that of lipoprotein lipase, which catabolizes TGs, is enhanced. In addition, Apo A1 and ATP binding cassette A1 production are upregulated, leading to increased reverse cholesterol transport via HDL. Consequently, fibrates reduce TGs by up to 50% and increase HDL-C by up to 20%, but LDL-C changes are variable.31
From a chemical point of view, the similarity in the structural scaffold of the furan benzophenone carboxamides and fibrates was very distinct. It was noted that fenofibrate exhibited a benzophenone group attached to a fibric acid unit. Most fibrates, including bezafibrate, have a similar scaffold to our system in that the fibric acid (A, free or ester prodrug) is attached to a lipophilic side chain (C) through an H-B acceptor linker (B) such as ether (Fig. 5).
Scaffold similarity might explain to some extent the pattern similarity on lipid profile and, of course, the close mechanism of action/targets to fibrates. However, the unusual activity of these compounds and the different patterns on TC levels might suggest an additional mechanism(s) by these compounds that need to be validated. The assumption of additional mechanism for these derivatives was verified by the publication of our team with closely related indole benzophenone derivatives,32 where it was revealed that, unlike bezafibrate,’’ most of the overexpressed genes by Triton were down-regulated by compound N-(3-Benzoylphenyl)-1H-Indole-2-carboxamide with significant decreases in Apoc3, Apob, Acaa2, Acsl1, and Slc247a5 gene expression levels. However, N-(4-benzoylphenyl)-1H-indole-2-carboxamide and bezafibrate did not significantly affect the upregulated gene expression levels in acute hyperlipidemic mice treated with Triton WR1339”.
In conclusion, it is accepted that these active compounds not only have an additional mechanism to bezafibrate but might also have additional and different mechanisms between themselves, explaining their different reduction activity on lipid profile (Fig. 6).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 % Reduction of TG plasma levels concerning HG groups. HG: hyperlipidemic control group; TG: triglyceride. | ||
The structure–activity relationship of this work reveals that furan carboxamides have unusual activity. Ester derivatives tested (b1–4 and b6–7) of this work (Table 2) displayed no activity against plasma lipids. The possibility of fast hydrolysis of the ester compound can explain this finding.
(Table 2) shows that substitutions at 3 and 4-benzophenones (a2 and a1, respectively) were more active than position 2 (a3). The a3 derivative lost antihyperlipidemic activity ultimately. This indicates that the lipophilic side chain is essential; the extended linear form is also required in active hits. Fig. 7 shows that a3 exhibited a non-extended, non-linear, V-shaped structure. This 3D orientation makes the NH of the amide and the carbonyl group of the benzophenone in proximity, possibly permitting intra-molecular hydrogen bonding (H-B) between the molecule functionalities, concealing them from interaction with the receptor or target (Fig. 7).
Further clues to support this H-B comes from NMR spectra. It was noticed that the NH proton peak was downfield shifted in a3 to around 11 ppm, compared to a1 and a2, which appeared at a lower value of 10.4. Similarly, the keto-carbonyl in a3 was downshifted/deshielded to 197 compared to a1 and a2, which appeared at 195.
Previously, it was found that benzophenone, in particular, had a superior antihyperlipidemic effect. In this work, we revealed that lipophilic groups, including benzophenone, acetophenone, and anisidine, are all essential since they are part of the active compounds. For some compounds, 3-benzophenone showed the best percentage of reduction in lipid profile, whereas, in others, the acetophenone or anisidine effect was dominant. Such variation in the potency suggests again shared and additional mechanisms for each. Lipophilicity was the most important with extra H-B acceptor group bridge in the side chain, such as carbonyl in both benzophenone and acetophenone (a1, a2, a10, a11, and a4, a12) and methoxy oxygen in a5. While lacking, this H-B acceptor may explain the inactivity of others (a6, a8).
Picolinic acid derivatives were very comparable to furan derivatives, such as a4 and a12 which only differ in the hetercycle moiety (furan vs. pyridine), suggesting the possibility of using other heterocycle rings. Picolinic acid derivatives still need further investigation.
Referring to the previously reported derivatives [8–15] and in addition to these new derivatives, we can conclude preliminary SAR criteria for active hits, including 5 or 6-ring heterocycle (A) with H-B acceptor atom, carboxamide linker (B), lipophilic side chain (C) with H-B acceptor bridge in addition to limited size to one or two rings, and finally extended linear structure (Fig. 8).
:
Hexane (1
:
2); (20 ml
:
40 ml) that gave pale yellow powder.
:
MeOH, 95
:
5); m.p.: 142–144 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.52 (br s, 1H, NHCO), 7.93 (br s, 3H, Ar–H-5, 2′ & 6′), 7.73 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-2′′ & 6′′), 7.68 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-3′′ & 5′′), 7.61 (br s, 1H, H-4′′), 7.51 (br s, 2H, Ar–H-3′ & 5′), 7.40 (br s, 1H, Ar–H-3), 6.69 (br s, 1H, Ar–H-4); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 195.09 (CO-ketone), 156.92 (CONH), 147.59 (C-2), 146.65 (C-5), 143.35 (C-1′), 137.97 (C-1′′), 132.75 (C-4′′), 132.22 (C-4′), 131.41 (C-2′ & 6′), 129.88 (C-2′′ & 6′′), 128.96 (C-3′′ & 5′′), 119.92 (C-3′ & 5′), 116.02 (C-3), 112.77 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + H+): found 292.09682 (C18H14NO3) requires 292.09737.
:
MeOH, 95
:
5); m.p.: 185–187 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.39 (br s, 1H, NHCO), 8.15 (br s, 1H, Ar–H-2′), 8.06 (d, J = 7.95 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-6′), 7.90 (s, 1H, Ar–H-5), 7.72 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-2′′ & 6′′), 7.64 (dd, J = 7.35, 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-4′′), 7.54 (d, J = 7.55 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-3′′ & 5′′), 7.49 (m, 1H, Ar–H-5′), 7.42 (d, J = 7.55 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-4′), 7.32 (d, J = 3.25 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-3), 6.66 (d, J = 1.55 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-4); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 195.25 (CO-ketone), 156.88 (CONH), 147.70 (C-2), 146.41 (C-5), 139.24 (C-1′), 137.87 (C-1′′), 137.48 (C-3′), 133.16 (C-2′), 130.11 (C-2′′ & 6′′), 129.46 (C-6′), 129.03 (C-3′′ & 5′′), 125.32 (C-4′′), 124.65 (C-5′), 121.77 (C-4′), 115.57 (C-3), 112.68 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + Na+): found 314.07876 (C18H13NNaO3) requires 314.07931.
:
MeOH, 95
:
5); m.p.: 109–110 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, Rotamers): δ = 11.00 (br s, 1H, NHCO), 8.04 (br s, 1H, Ar–H-5), 7.86 (d, J = 8.05 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.68–7.55 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.54–7.41 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.19 (br s, 1H, H-3), 6.60 (br s, 1H, H-4); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 197.27 (CO-ketone), 156.41 (CONH), 147.62 (C-2), 146.42 (C-5), 137.97 (C-1′), 137.80 (C-1′′), 133.33 (Ar-CH), 133.01 (Ar-CH), 132.00 (Ar-CH), 130.13 (C-2′′ & 6′′), 128.72 (C-3′′ & 5′′), 128.44 (C-2′), 124.25 (Ar-CH), 123.38 (Ar-CH), 115.74 (C-3), 112.86 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + Na+): found 314.07877 (C18H13NNaO3) requires 314.07931.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 181–184 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.43 (s, 1H, NHCO), 7.93–7.85 (m, 5H, Ar–H-2′, 3′, 5′, 6′ & 5), 7.36 (d, J = 3.35 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-3), 6.67 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-4), 2.49 (s, 3H, COCH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 197.04 (CO-ketone), 156.87 (CONH), 147.61 (C-2), 146.59 (C-5), 143.49 (C-1′), 132.51 (C-4′), 129.75 (C-3′ & 5′), 119.89 (C-2′ & 6′), 115.94 (C-3), 112.76 (C-4), 26.90 (CH3) ppm. HRMS (ESI, negative mode): m/z (M+ − H+): found 228.06662 (C13H10NO3) requires 228.06607.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 108 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.02 (s, 1H, NHCO), 7.86 (s, 1H, H-5), 7.61 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-2′ & 6′), 7.24 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, H-3), 6.88 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, H-3′ & 5′), 6.64 (br s, 1H, Ar–H-4), 3.69 (s, 3H, OCH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 156.42 (CONH), 156.09 (C-4′), 148.20 (C-2), 145.89 (C-5), 131.98 (C-1′), 122.48 (C-3′ & 5′), 114.74 (C-3), 114.24 (C-2′ & 6′), 112.52 (C-4), 55.63(OCH3) ppm. HRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + Na): found 240.06311 (C12H11NNaO3) requires 240.06366.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 150–153 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.27 (br s, 1H, NHCO), 7.89 (s, 1H, H-5), 7.75 (d, J = 8.65 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-2′ & 6′), 7.35 (d, J = 8.65 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-3′ & 5′), 7.30 (d, J = 3.25 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-3), 6.66 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-4); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 156.69 (CONH), 147.76 (C-2), 146.32 (C-5), 138.01 (C-1′), 129.00 (C-3′ & 5′), 127.84 (C-4′), 122.31 (C-2′ & 6′), 115.49 (C-3), 112.67 (C-4) ppm.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 39–42 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 8.26 (br s, 1H, NH–CO), 7.75 (br s, 1H, H-5), 7.01 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, H-3), 6.55 (d, J = 1.35 Hz, 1H, H-4), 3.16 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H, CH2-1′), 1.42 (m, J = 7.25 Hz, 2H, CH2-2′), 1.25 (m, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH2-3′), 0.84 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH3-4′); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 158.12 (CONH), 148.62 (C-2), 145.16 (C-5), 113.39 (C-3), 112.17 (C-4), 38.54 (CH2-1′), 31.77 (CH2-2′), 20.04 (CH2-3′), 14.13 (CH3-4′) ppm. HRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + Na+): found 190.08385 (C9H13NNaO2) requires 190.08440.
:
ethylacetate, 7
:
3); m.p.: 121–125 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.15 (s, 1H, NHCO), 7.88 (s, 1H, Ar–H-5), 7.75 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-2′ & 6′), 7.30 (m, 3H, Ar–H-3′,5′ & 3), 7.05 (dd, J = 7.3, 7.25, 1H, Ar–H-4′), 6.64 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, Ar–H-4); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 156.73 (CONH), 148.07 (C-2), 146.07 (C-5), 139.02 (C-1′), 129.09 (C-3′ & 5′), 124.21 (C-4′), 120.90 (C-2′ & 6′), 115.18 (C-3), 112.59 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + H+): found 188.07060 (C11H10NO2) requires 188.07115. LRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + H+): 188.07 (M+1, 47%), 161.04 (10%), 160.04 (100%), 82.97 (9%), 46.4 (15%), 42.0 (7%).
:
3); (15
:
45 ml) to furnish pure golden needle-like crystals. (1.06 g, 66%); Rf: 0.6 (DCM
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 102–105 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.04 (s, 1H, NHCO), 7.88 (s, 1H, Ar–H-5), 7.29 (s, 1H, Ar–H-3), 7.02 (s, 2H, Ar–H-2′ & 6′), 6.65 (s, 1H, Ar–H-4), 6.22 (s, 1H, Ar–H-4′), 3.68 (s, 6H, 2OCH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 160.84 (C-3′ & 5′), 156.67 (CONH), 147.92 (C-2), 146.20 (C-5), 140.69 (C-1′), 115.24 (C-3), 112.62 (C-4), 99.03 (C-2′ & 6′), 96.17 (C-4′), 55.56 (2OCH3) ppm.
Work up: cold water (60 ml) was added to the mixture with stirring for 10 minutes, and the pH was adjusted to 11 using potassium carbonate (K2CO3) to remove the excess starting material.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 161–166 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.94 (br s, 1H, NHCO), 8.72 (d, J = 4.15 Hz, 1H, H-6), 8.14 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, H-3), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, H-2′ & 6′), 8.04 (dd, J = 7.65, 7.65 Hz, 1H, H-4), 7.74 (d, J = 8.35 Hz, 2H, H-3′ & 5′), 7.70–7.59 (m, 4H, H-2′′, 6′′, 5 & 4′′), 7.52 (dd, J = 7.4, 7.5 Hz, 2H, H-3′′ & 5′′); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 195.09 (CO-ketone), 163.49 (CONH), 150.04 (C-2), 148.96 (C-6), 143.01 (QC-Ar), 138.68 (CH–Ar), 137.95 (QC–Ar), 132.76 (CH–Ar), 132.49 (QC–Ar), 131.37 (C-3′ & 5′), 129.89 (C-2′′ & 6′′), 128.96 (C3′′ & 5′′), 127.67 (CH–Ar), 123.12 (CH–Ar), 120.09 (C-2′ & 6′) ppm.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 122–123 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.94 (br s, 1H, NHCO), 8.69 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H, H-6), 8.37 (br s, 1H, H-2′), 8.15 (d, J = 8.05 Hz, 1H, H-6′), 8.12 (d, J = 7.8 Hz 1H, H-3), 8.02 (dd, J = 7.65,7.65 Hz, 1H, H-4), 7.74 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, H-2′′ & 6′′), 7.67–7.60 (m, 2H, H-4′ & 5′), 7.56–7.48 (m, 3H, H-5,3′′ & 5′′), 7.45 (d, J = 7.65 Hz, 1H, H-4′′); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 196.05 (CO-ketone), 163.39 (CONH), 150.19 (C-2), 148.91 (C-6), 139.04 (QC–Ar), 138.59 (CH–Ar), 137.94 (QC–Ar), 137.48 (QC–Ar), 133.17 (CH–Ar), 130.15 (C-2′′ & 6′′), 129.44 (CH–Ar), 129.04 (C-3′′ & 5′′), 127.51 (CH–Ar), 125.49 (CH–Ar), 124.85 (CH–Ar), 122.99 (CH–Ar), 121.92 (CH–Ar) ppm.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 166–170 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.94 (s, 1H, NHCO), 8.71 (d, J = 3.95 Hz, 1H, H-6), 8.13 (d, J = 7.65 Hz, 1H, H-3), 8.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H, H-3′,5′ & 4), 7.93 (d, J = 8.45 Hz, 2H, H-2′ & 6′), 7.65 (dd, J = 5.3, 6.4 Hz, 1H, H-5), 2.51 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 197.09 (CO-ketone), 163.44 (CONH), 150.15 (C-2), 148.96 (C-6), 143.17 (QC-Ar), 138.68 (CH–Ar), 132.74 (QC–Ar), 129.74 (C-3′ & 5′), 127.66 (CH–Ar), 123.09 (CH–Ar), 120.06 (C-2′ & 6′), 26.96 (CH3) ppm.
:
The starting material 4-hydroxybenzophenone (5.05 mmol) was placed in a round bottom flask under the fume hood. Pyridine (8.65 mmol, acylation catalyst) and triethylamine (5 mmol, acid scavenger) were added and followed by the addition of furoyl chloride (10.15 mmol) gradually to the reaction mixture at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred under reflux for 24 h at 75 °C. After 24 h, the TLC showed that the ester was formed as a major product, with a different spot on the baseline for the hydrolyzed furoic acid. Cold water was added to the solid mixture (50 ml), and the pH was adjusted to 10 using potassium carbonate (K2CO3) to remove the excess starting material. A white suspension was filtered by suction filtration using a Buchner funnel under a vacuum to obtain the product of interest. Recrystallization from methanol has furnished the ester as off-white crystals. (0.96 g, 66%); Rf: 0.95 (DCM
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 124–125 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 8.09 (br s, 1H, H-5), 7.81 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-3′ & 5′), 7.72 (d, J = 6.50 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-2′ & 6′), 7.64 (m, 1H, H-4′′), 7.58 (br s, 1H, Ar–H-3), 7.54 (d, J = 6.55 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-2′′ & 6′′), 7.44 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H-3′′ & 5′′), 6.78 (br s, 1H, Ar–H-4); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 195.19 (CO-ketone), 156.33 (COO-ester), 153.58 (C-2), 149.41 (C-5), 143.16 (C-1′), 137.38 (C-1′′), 135.26 (C-4′), 133.20 (C-4′′), 131.88, 130.05, 129.08, 122.58 (C-2′,3′,5′,6′,2′′,3′′,5′′ and 6′′), 121.15 (C-3), 113.34 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, positive mode): m/z (M+ + Na+): found 315.06278 (C18H12NaO4) requires 315.06333.
:
MeOH, 98
:
2); m.p.: 91–94 °C; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 8.07 (br s, 1H, H-5), 7.91 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.64 (t, J = 7.7, 7.7 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 7.53 (d, J = 3.2, 1H, H-3), 7.42 (t, J = 7.55, 7.55 Hz, 1H, H-4′), 7.33 (d, J = 8.05, 1H, H-6′), 6.76 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, H-4), 2.48 (br s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 197.83 (CO-keton), 156.61 (CO-ester), 149.15 (C-5), 148.16 (C-2), 143.56 (C-1′), 134.15 (C-3′), 131.25 (C-2′), 130.90 (C-5′), 127.05 (C-4′), 124.47 (C-6′), 120.83 (C-3), 113.23 (C-4), 29.98 (CH3) ppm.
Footnotes |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra03581f |
| ‡ Both authors contributed equally. |
| § Author for correspondence and reprint requests. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |