Olga
Bakhanovich
ab,
Blanka
Klepetářová
a and
Petr
Beier
*a
aInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Prague 6, Czech Republic. E-mail: cbeier@uochb.cas.cz
bDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 2030/8, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic
First published on 21st September 2023
Copper(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition of substituted cyclohexenyl acetylenes with azido(per)fluoroalkanes afforded 4-cyclohexenyl-substituted N-(per)fluoroalkylated 1,2,3-triazoles. Their rhodium(II)-catalyzed transannulation led to fused N-(per)fluoroalkyl pyrroles and subsequent oxidation provided N-(per)fluoroalkyl indoles.
Introduction of fluorine atoms and fluorinated groups (such as the trifluoromethyl group) is an established strategy to improve medicinal properties of drug candidates, including bioactivity, bioavailability, influencing pKa of neighbouring groups, and protein binding affinity.3–6
Fluorinated and trifluoromethylated indole derivatives are known. Radical trifluoromethylation of indole and its derivatives takes place in position 2 or 3 of the indole ring7,8 and electrophilic trifluoromethylation is not a viable strategy for the preparation of trifluoromethylated indoles (Scheme 1), although it works on indolides with the Togni reagents9,10 or Umemoto's oxonium reagents.11 Similarly, oxidative desulfurization of dithiocarbamates to N-CF3 motifs is known to proceed on indolines but not on indoles.12
N-Trifluoromethylated azoles (imidazoles, benzimidazoles, pyrazoles) have promising medicinal chemistry properties;13 however, N-trifluoromethylated indole derivatives are very rare. The only known access to them is a multistep synthesis starting from aryl isothiocyanates which are transformed into key intermediates N-CF3-hydrazines using an excess of AgF and triphosgene. Under acidic conditions, these hydrazines participate in a Fisher indole synthesis (Scheme 1).14 This synthetic strategy is limited to N-trifluoromethylated 2,3-disubstituted indoles. Furthermore, only three examples of this kind are known.
Our alternative synthetic methodology to N-CF3 and N-(per)fluoroalkyl indoles 3 utilizes 4-cyclohexenyl substituted 1,2,3-triazoles 1 with fluoroalkyl groups on nitrogen. They are easily prepared from fluorinated azidoalkanes developed in our group15,16 using copper(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC). Taking inspiration from Rh(II)-catalyzed reaction of analogous N-sulfonyl triazoles,17 transannulation (4π cyclization) of triazoles 1 would give fused pyrroles 2. Their oxidation would provide target indoles 3 (Scheme 1).
Substituted cyclohexenyl acetylenes17 underwent CuAAC with a variety of fluorinated azidoalkanes under previously reported conditions18 using copper(I) 3-methylsalicylate (CuMeSal) catalyst in THF under ambient temperature (Scheme 2). The method allows for the generation of diversity on the cyclohexenyl moiety as well as substitution on the nitrogen with substrate-dependent yields ranging from good to high.
Triazole 1a was subjected to Rh(II)-catalyzed transannulation reaction. Optimization of the reaction conditions revealed that Rh2(esp)2 catalyst was more efficient than Rh2(Oct)4 or Rh2(AcO)4 catalysts (Table 1, entries 1–3). The minimal reaction temperature and time were 100 °C and 10 min, respectively (entries 3–5). Several solvents were tested and the best product yield was obtained using 1,2-dichloroethane (entries 6–8). Under optimized conditions (entry 9) product 2a was obtained in 64% 19F NMR yield. High product volatility significantly reduced the isolated yield, nevertheless optimized conditions for the synthesis of compounds 2 were identified.
Entry | Rh(II) | Solvent | Temp. (°C) | Time (min) | 2a yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), solvent (2 ml).
b ![]() |
|||||
1 | Rh2(Oct)4 | CHCl3 | 100 | 10 | 4c |
2 | Rh2(OAc)4 | CHCl3 | 100 | 10 | 22c |
3 | Rh2(esp)2 | CHCl3 | 100 | 10 | 50 |
4 | Rh2(esp)2 | CHCl3 | 100 | 5 | 47c |
5 | Rh2(esp)2 | CHCl3 | 80 | 10 | 38c |
6 | Rh2(esp)2 | DCE | 100 | 10 | 50 |
7 | Rh2(esp)2 | Toluene | 100 | 30 | 51 |
8 | Rh2(esp)2 | DCM | 100 | 30 | 55 |
9 | Rh2(esp)2 | THF | 100 | 30 | nr |
10 | Rh2(esp)2 | DMF | 100 | 30 | nr |
11 | Rh 2 (esp) 2 | DCE | 100 | 30 | 64 |
12 | Rh2(esp)2 | Hexane | 100 | 30 | 30 |
Application of optimized conditions to triazoles 1 afforded fused pyrroles 2 (Scheme 3). Product 2b was highly volatile and was not isolated, but it formed in a high NMR yield. The presence of t-Bu, n-Pr or Ph groups on the fused ring reduced the volatility and allowed the product isolation in good yields. The presence of electron-acceptor trifluoromethyl group on the cyclohexenyl moiety caused the decomposition of product 2l. The silyl-containing substrate 1m was not a competent substrate in this reaction. Pyrroles 2 were stable at −20 °C under inert atmosphere but decomposed on air or at ambient temperature. We established that the addition of DDQ to the reaction mixture of 2a led to full oxidation to indole 3a under microwave heating to 100 °C for 30 min. This enabled to perform a one-pot reaction of triazoles 1 directly to indoles 3 (Scheme 4). Again, 3a was too volatile for isolation, but other indoles formed with moderate to good efficiency. Triazole 1k underwent successful transannulation and oxidation to the desired N-fluoroalkylated indole, accompanied by the side-product 3k. The use of 6 equiv. of DDQ afforded cleanly the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 3k arising from the oxidation of the pendant n-propyl group. All of the reported N-trifluoromethyl-, N-pentafluoroethyl, N-tetrafluoroethyl-, and N-difluoromethylphenylsulfonyl indoles are new compounds.
![]() | ||
Scheme 3 Preparation of fused pyrroles 2 (19F NMR yields in parentheses). a![]() |
To demonstrate the synthetic utility of the prepared N-fluoroalkyl indoles, derivatization of the primary product 3b was conducted. N-Fluoroalkylated indoles should be strongly deactivated towards electrophilic aromatic substitution compared to NH or N-Me indoles. Nevertheless, efficient electrophilic bromination and acylation took place selectively in position three to afford brominated or acylated indoles, 4 and 5, respectively (Scheme 5). Lithiation with n-BuLi and carboxylation was also regioselective and gave indole-2-carboxylic acid 6. Crystallographic analysis of acid 6 confirmed the product structure.
In summary, 4-cyclohexenyl-substituted N-fluoroalkylated-1,2,3-triazoles 1 obtained by CuAAC undergo rhodium(II)-catalyzed transannulation reaction to fused N-fluoroalkylated pyrroles 2 which are oxidized to N-fluoroalkylated indoles 3. The two-step process can be conveniently performed in one pot. This methodology represents an alternative synthetic pathway to N-CF3-indoles, previously prepared via N-CF3-hydrazines, and is applicable to the synthesis of indoles, substituted with various fluoroalkyl groups on nitrogen and having a substitution on the benzene ring. Follow-up derivatizations of one example of N-perfluoroalkyl indole by electrophilic aromatic acylation, bromination, and lithiation/carboxylation expand the diversity of accessible N-fluoroalkylated indole structures.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 2291313. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ob01415k |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |