Hannah E.
Kerr
*a,
Jeremy P.
Allen
a,
Anders
Hagfeldt
b,
Jeroen J. L. M.
Cornelissen
c and
Natalie
Stingelin
d
aRoyal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK
bDepartment of Chemistry – Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
cLaboratory for Biomolecular Nanotechnology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede, The Netherlands
dSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
White light emission generated by two stacking patterns of a single organic molecular crystal (https://doi.org/10.1039/D2MA00670G) by Yuma Nakagawa*, Kuon Kinoshita, Megumi Kasuno, Ryo Nishimura, Masakazu Morimoto, Satoshi Yokojima*, Makoto Hatakeyama, Yuki Sakamoto, Shinichiro Nakamura and Kingo Uchida*
Recipients of the Paper Prize will receive:
• Certificates for all authors who contributed to the work
• A complimentary infographic
• Promotion through the various journal channels.
A shortlist of papers was selected by the Editorial Office using quantitative measures taking a snapshot of the performance of all the papers published in a 2022 issue. Citations, article downloads, and Altmetric scores (social media and news engagement) were considered. This data was gathered in March 2023, and the length of time since online publication was taken into account during our assessment to avoid the selection automatically favouring those papers that were published first. We also asked our Editorial and Advisory Board members to recommend papers to us that they recalled seeing, either as a reader or as a handling editor.
The shortlist of 15 papers were then sent to all 200+ members of our Editorial Board and Advisory Board for voting. This diverse group are all expert materials scientists and between them cover the wide-ranging scope of the journal. We felt that this maximised the subject area expertise of those who were voting and was the fairest method of selecting a single winning paper.
They were asked to judge the papers based on the following criteria:
• Quality of discovery/advance presented
• Potential future impact
• Originality of the work
• Significance to the field
Selecting a single paper to recognise for this annual award necessarily involved a degree of subjective assessment based on the above criteria. However, the broad experience and knowledge of our combined Editorial and Advisory Board members allowed a clear consensus to be reached. Board members were asked to indicate any potential conflicts of interest and these were taken into account.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |