Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Muscle characteristics comparison and targeted metabolome analysis reveal differences in carcass traits and meat quality of three pig breeds

Bo Song ab, Yating Cheng ab, Md. Abul Kalam Azad a, Sujuan Ding a, Kang Yao ab and Xiangfeng Kong *ab
aKey Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, China. E-mail: nnkxf@isa.ac.cn
bCollege of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Received 6th September 2023 , Accepted 6th September 2023

First published on 18th September 2023


Abstract

Correction for ‘Muscle characteristics comparison and targeted metabolome analysis reveal differences in carcass traits and meat quality of three pig breeds’ by Bo Song et al., Food Funct., 2023, 14, 7603–7614, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2FO03709B.


The authors regret the omission of a footnote from Table 1. Table 1 should read as follows:
Table 1 Carcass traits and meat quality of Duroc, TB, and XB pigs at 185 days of age
Items Duroc pigs TB pigs XB pigs SEM P-Values
Data are presented as means with their pooled SEM (n = 8). a–c[thin space (1/6-em)]Mean values with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). TB, Taoyuan black; XB, Xiangcun black; L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness; WHC, water-holding capacity; IMF, intramuscular fat. The carcass weight, lean mass, lean percentage, fat mass, and fat percentage in this study were all derived from the left half of the carcass. All carcass traits, including carcass weight, loin eye area, backfat depth, fat mass, fat percentage, lean mass, and lean percentage, were all derived from the left half of the carcass.
Carcass weight, kg 38.85a 25.82b 25.49b 1.43 <0.01
Loin eye area, cm2 60.46a 31.75b 28.52b 3.35 <0.01
Backfat depth, mm 19.49b 23.87ab 26.25a 1.16 <0.05
Fat mass, kg 5.59 5.76 6.62 0.31 0.36
Fat percentage, % 14.50b 22.30a 25.50a 1.25 <0.01
Lean mass, kg 23.03a 14.33b 13.18b 0.98 <0.01
Lean percentage, % 59.25a 55.38b 51.88c 0.80 <0.01
pH45 min 6.82a 6.38b 6.56b 0.06 <0.01
pH24 h 5.52 5.61 5.46 0.03 0.20
pH decline 1.29a 0.76b 1.10a 0.08 <0.01
L* 47.13a 44.72b 43.10b 0.49 <0.01
a* 14.92 15.18 15.30 0.18 0.68
b* 5.34a 3.59b 4.46ab 0.22 <0.01
WHC, % 78.75b 81.13a 79.63ab 0.37 0.02
Cooking loss, % 34.50 33.25 34.20 0.38 0.35
Shear force, N 89.91a 77.41b 69.84b 2.76 <0.01
IMF, % 2.28b 3.50a 3.28a 0.21 0.03
Dry matter, % 25.42b 26.43ab 27.22a 0.26 0.01
Crude protein (dry basis), % 74.69 73.37 68.52 1.63 0.28


The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.