Verónica
Arreaza-Gil‡
a,
Héctor
Palacios-Jordan‡
ab,
María del Mar
Romero
cd,
Cristina
Torres-Fuentes
a,
Miguel A.
Rodríguez
b,
Xavier
Remesar
c,
José-Antonio
Fernández-López
cd and
Anna
Arola-Arnal
*ac
aNutrigenomics Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain. E-mail: anna.arola@urv.cat
bEurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya, Centre for Omic Sciences (COS), Joint Unit Univeristat Rovira i Virgili-EURECAT, Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), 43204 Reus, Spain
cDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
dCIBER Obesity and Nutrition, Institute of Health Carlos III, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
First published on 11th July 2023
Proanthocyanidins (PAs) are one of the most commonly ingested polyphenols in the human diet, with a wide range of beneficial health effects. Remarkably, PAs have been reported to influence core and peripheral clock genes expression, and their effects may change in a time-of-day dependent manner. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the capacity of PAs to modulate the metabolome is conditioned by the time-of-day in which these compounds are consumed in a diet- and sex-dependent manner. To do this, a grape seed proanthocyanidin extract (GSPE) was administered to female and male Fischer 344 rats at ZT0 (in the morning) and ZT12 (at night) and the GSPE administration time effect was evaluated on clock genes expression, melatonin hormone and serum metabolite levels in a healthy and obesogenic context. The results showed an administration time effect of GSPE on the metabolome in a sex and diet-dependent manner. Specifically, there was an effect on amino acid, lipid and cholate metabolite levels that correlated with the central clock genes expression. Therefore, this study shows a strong influence of sex and diet on the PAs effects on the metabolome, modulated in turn by the time-of-day.
Circadian rhythms are driven by central clock genes, found in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), and by peripheral clock tissues.4 These molecular clocks follow 24-hour cycles and consist of an autoregulatory negative transcription-translation feedback loop formed by the brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like 1 (BMAL1) and the circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK), which after heterodimerization activate period (Per) and cryptochrome (Cry) gene transcription. The protein products PER and CRY repress the activity of BMAL1/CLOCK dimer.5Bmal1 gene is also regulated by the inhibitor nuclear receptors REV-ERB α and β and the activator RAR-orphan receptor α and γ (RORα and -γ).6 Moreover, BMAL1/CLOCK controls the transcription of additional clock-controlled genes (CCGs) involved in numerous cellular processes.7 The central clocks synchronize the peripheral clocks by neuronal mechanisms and hormonal signals, including melatonin that indicates the time of environmental darkness,8,9 although peripheral clocks in turn are also capable of local and autonomous regulation.8 In this context, light is the main external synchronizer or zeitgeber of diurnal rhythmicity in the organism,10 but others such as diet or feeding pattern also can modulate and reprogram the diurnal oscillation of the body.11–13 Nevertheless, misaligning cues like obesogenic diets can disrupt the clock gene expressions, triggering the development of metabolic disorders.14 It is important to point out that circadian rhythms influence metabolic processes according to sex,15 and in turn their misalignment affect differently to men and women. Like this, the alteration of diurnal oscillations by shift works, promoted a higher disturbance in the energy homeostasis processes in women compared to men.16,17 Another similar study in shift workers showed increased proinflammatory gut bacteria in women in comparison with men, may leading to higher rates of obesity.16,17 Furthermore, in a mice study, Pérez-Mendoza et al.18 reported that hepatic BMAL1 expression was more altered in high fat diet-fed (HFD) female mice than in male mice, impacting differently on lipid metabolism.
Therefore, circadian rhythms are key factors in the regulation of a great number of metabolic pathways. For instance, diurnal oscillations of insulin and glucagon levels regulate glucose homeostasis.19,20 Triglycerides follow a circadian regulation achieved through the rhythmic gene expression pattern of enzymes involved in fatty acid elongation and synthesis.21,22 Similarly, cholesterol synthesis in the liver exhibits diurnal rhythmicity trough the rhythmic expression of β-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG-CoA).23 Additionally, bile acids synthesis shows a well-known rhythmicity, both in rodents and humans, by modulation of the expression of the enzyme cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1).24,25 Finally, although the relationship between amino acid metabolism and circadian rhythms is less understood, it appears that circulating amino acid levels vary according to the time of the day. Thus, branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), which are important modulators of metabolism and metabolic health, undergo diurnal oscillations via Krüppel-like factor 15 (KLF15) in muscle.26
The rhythmicity of these metabolic pathways can therefore be reflected in the concentration of metabolites in serum and investigated by metabolomics approaches. In fact, most serum metabolites show diurnal rhythmicity under normal physiological conditions.27 However, nutritional challenges like the consumption of hypercaloric diets induce a loss of serum metabolite rhythmicity, leading to the development of obesity and metabolic-related disorders.28
Proanthocyanidins (PAs) are the most abundant flavonoids in the human diet with numerous beneficial health effects,29–31 as epidemiological studies have reported.32,33 In particular, our group has extensively studied, in animal models, the effects of a grape seed proanthocyanidin-rich extract (GSPE), establishing that GSPE can effectively prevent obesity by improving lipid metabolism,34 insulin resistance,35 and decreasing oxidative stress pathways.36 Moreover, in a human clinical trial in hypercholesterolemic subjects, GSPE supplementation significantly reduced oxidized LDL, a biomarker of cardiovascular diseases, and significantly inhibited CD36 expression, a novel cardioregulatory gene, demonstrating that GSPE is a potential therapeutic tool.37 These effects are carried out through different mechanism of action: GSPE activates antioxidant enzymes such as catalase or superoxide dismutase, decreasing reactive oxygen species (ROS); efficiently regulates the activity of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), modulating pro-inflammatory processes; induces epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation, histone modification or regulates miRNAs; and can modulate the gut microbiota composition.29 Regarding to this last point, it is worth mentioning that the relationship between GSPE and gut microbiota is bidirectional, and that the gut microbiota undergo extensive transformation of the phenolic compounds, driving the metabolized forms most of effects of PAs.38,39 Remarkably, GSPE has also been reported as a key modulator of clock genes, being this another possible mechanism of action.40–42 Accordingly, GSPE has been found to modulate the expression of central and peripheral clock genes in healthy and obese rats,40,42 as well as to exert an effect on plasma melatonin levels in healthy rats.41 Moreover, it has been recently showed that GSPE effects in liver and adipose tissue depend on the time of administration,43,44 and that the bioavailability of GSPE in plasma is also significantly impacted by the time of its administration.45 Hence, the relationship between GSPE and circadian rhythms seems to be bidirectional since GSPE influence clock genes, but circadian rhythms also can affect its functionality. In this context, GSPE could be a potential nutraceutical that would prevent metabolic disorders depending on the time of day it is ingested, by adjusting the biological oscillation of clock genes and modulating melatonin levels, promoting good synchronization with light/dark cycles, and these changes are measurable by metabolic approaches. It is important to note that the beneficial effects of GSPE on metabolic disorders could also vary according to sex, since the circadian misalignment observed in metabolic-related diseases, influences men and women differently, as discussed above.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the capacity of PAs to modulate metabolism is conditioned by the time-of-day in which this compound is consumed. To this goal, the effect of GSPE administration time on central clock gene expression and serum metabolite levels was evaluated in a healthy and an obesogenic context, and in female and male rats to account for the significant sex differences in circadian rhythms.
Compound concentration (mg g−1) | Compound concentration (mg g−1) |
---|---|
Table adapted from Margalef et al. 2016.46 The results are expressed as mg of phenolic compound/g of GSPE (mean ± SD). PA: proanthocyanin | |
Gallic acid | 31.07 ± 0.08 |
Protocatechuic acid | 1.34 ± 0.02 |
Vanillic acid | 0.77 ± 0.04 |
PA dimer B2 | 33.24 ± 1.39 |
PA dimer B1 | 88.80 ± 3.46 |
PA dimer B3 | 46.09 ± 2.07 |
Catechin | 121.32 ± 3.41 |
Epicatechin | 93.44 ± 4.27 |
Dimer gallate | 8.86 ± 0.14 |
Epicatechin gallate | 21.24 ± 1.08 |
Epigallocatechin gallate | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
Epigallocatechin | 0.27 ± 0.03 |
PA trimer | 4.90 ± 0.47 |
PA tetramer | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
After 5 weeks of dietary feeding, female and male rats in each dietary group were further randomly divided into four groups according to the GSPE administration time (n = 8). Thus, during the last 4 weeks of the experiment, animals were administered with a daily oral dose of GSPE (25 mg per kg of body weight (BW)) dissolved in vehicle (VH, condensed milk diluted in water (1:
4 v
:
v)) when the light was turned on (zeitgeber time (ZT) 0; ZT0) or when the light was turned off (ZT12). In addition, VH-administered animals were included as controls. The experimental design is described in Fig. 1.
BW was recorded weekly in all groups throughout the experimental procedure. At the end of the experiment, animals were fasted for 3 hours after administration of the last dose and sacrificed by decapitation. Thereby, animals administered at ZT0 were sacrificed 3 hours after light was turned on (ZT3) and animals administered at ZT12 were sacrificed 3 hours after light was turned off (ZT15). Blood was collected from the neck and serum was obtained by centrifugation (1500g, 20 min, 4 °C). Hypothalamus samples were collected, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. The Animal Ethics Committee of the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Tarragona, Spain) and the Generalitat de Catalunya approved all the procedures (license number 9495) in accordance with the EU Directive 2010/63/UE for animal.
Target | Forward 5′–3′ | Reverse 3′–5′ |
---|---|---|
Ppia: peptidylprolyl isomerase a; Bmal1: brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like; Cry: Cryptochrome; Clock: circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; Per1/2: period circadian regulator 1/2; RORα: Orphan nuclear receptor α. | ||
Ppia | CTTCGAGCTGTTTGCAGACAA | AAGTCACCACCCTGGCACATG |
Bmal1 | GACTTCGCCTCCACCTGTTC | TCTTCGTCCAGCCCCATCTT |
Cry | GTTGCCTGTTTCCTGACCCG | ATTGATGCTCCAGTCGGCGT |
Clock | ACTCCTTCTGCCTCCTCCAG | TCCGCTGTGTCATCTTCTCA |
Per1 | AACAACAGCCACGGTTCTCA | GCTACCACAGTCCACACAAGC |
Per2 | TGGAGCAGGTTGAGGGCATT | GGGACACAGCCACAGCAAAC |
RORα | GGCTTCTTCCCCTACTGTTCC | ATTGGCAGGTTTCCAGGTGC |
Metabolomic profiles were analyzed by 4-way ANOVA to assess the sex, diet, GSPE and ZT effects and their interactions, as well as by 2-way ANOVA to better evaluate GSPE and ZT effects in each condition (Table S1†). When one or more main effects were statistically significant (p < 0.05), one-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hot test was used to determinate the differences between groups. To control family-wise type I error rate, p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons with the false discovery rate (FDR) method (p < 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) and heatmaps involving metabolite levels data were analyzed and plotted using MetaboAnalyst v.5.049 to determine the influence of different factors on the metabolic profiles though a multivariate approach.
Pearson's rank-order correlation analysis between gene expression and metabolite levels were carry out using Python script (PyCharm software v.2018.2.4, JetBrains s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic) as it was previously described by our group.50
The clock gene expressions of STD-fed males that received VH at ZT12 showed the same pattern than STD-fed females. CAF influenced the expression of clock genes by promoting, in males, the loss of the time-of-day effect in Bmal1, Clock and Per1 (Fig. 2a–c). In contrast, Per2 showed the same time effect that STD-fed males and Cry expression levels increased in rats receiving VH at ZT12 (Fig. 2d and e).
Remarkably, an overall sex effect was found on the hypothalamus clock genes, being this effect higher in STD-fed rats. In this context, when comparing STD-fed males versus STD-fed females, Bmal1 expression increased only in those rats treated with GSPE, independently of the time of administration (Fig. 2a), clock expression was higher in all STD-fed males groups, except for STD-VH-ZT12, which did not show sex differences, Per2 was increased in all STD-fed males, except for STD-VH-ZT0 males (Fig. 2b and d), Cry expression increased in all STD-fed groups, and Per1 and RORα expression only increased in the STD-VH-ZT0 group (Fig. 2c, e and f). This sex effect was lower in CAF-fed rats, and although CAF feeding in males decreased the clock gene expressions compared to STD-fed males, these levels were like those observed in CAF-fed female rats.
The GSPE effects are also influenced by sex. When GSPE was administered to STD-fed females, the extract effect was only observed at night. However, when GSPE was administered to STD-fed males, there was no clear pattern compared to STD-fed females. Thus, GSPE administration to STD-fed males resulted in increased expression levels of Bmal1 and Cry at ZT12 and Per2 at ZT0, while RORα and Cry expression levels decreased at ZT0 (Fig. 2a–f). Moreover, CAF-fed males did not show any GSPE effect at either ZT0 or ZT12 in contrast to CAF-fed females, which showed a higher GSPE effect in the morning. Therefore, GSPE influenced hypothalamus clock genes in a diet and sex-dependent manner.
In addition, a significant sex effect was also found on melatonin levels, being higher in STD-fed males at ZT15 compared to STD-females. Interestingly, sex effect was not observed in melatonin levels in CAF-fed rats.
Regarding the time-of-day effect in males, melatonin levels showed the same pattern than those observed in females. Melatonin levels were higher at night (ZT15) in both STD- and CAF-fed males. In contrast to CAF-fed females, CAF did not increase melatonin levels in males compared to STD-fed males. However, GSPE also did not influence melatonin levels in STD- and CAF-fed males.
In addition, overall serum metabolic profiles were assessed by PCA in each diet condition and sex to further evaluate the GSPE effect on the metabolome depending on the time of administration (Fig. 4b–e). STD-fed females showed a time effect, and only rats receiving VH at ZT0 (in the morning) were clustered separately. Interestingly, STD-fed females administered with GSPE at ZT0 showed a similar metabolic profile to those administered with VH or GSPE at ZT12 (at night), suggesting that GSPE influenced the metabolic profile of STD-fed female rats mostly when it was administered in the morning (Fig. 4b). However, CAF-fed female rats did not show a defined clustering, so neither time-of-day nor GSPE effects were observed (Fig. 4c). Similarly to female rats, STD-fed males showed a time-of-day effect, clustering separately rats that received VH at ZT0 from those receiving VH at ZT12. However, in this case, GSPE administration at both ZT0 and ZT12 changed the metabolic profile of these rats, clustering separately from controls administered with VH at both ZT0 and ZT12, respectively (Fig. 4d). Moreover, CAF male rats, as in the case of CAF females, did not show time-of-day or GSPE effect since defined clusters were not observed (Fig. 4e).
Female | Male | P-Valuea | FDRb | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STD | CAF | STD | CAF | |||||||||||||||
VH-ZT0 | GSPE-ZT0 | VH-ZT12 | GSPE-ZT12 | VH-ZT0 | GSPE-ZT0 | VH-ZT12 | GSPE-ZT12 | VH-ZT0 | GSPE-ZT0 | VH-ZT12 | GSPE-ZT12 | VH-ZT0 | GSPE-ZT0 | VH-ZT12 | GSPE-ZT12 | |||
Data are plotted as means ± SD (arbitrary units).a P-Value by one-way ANOVA. *, t, # and $ indicate significant GPSE, ZT, diet and sex effect respectively analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hot test (p < 0.05). The 4-way ANOVA and 2-way ANOVA significant effects are shown in Table S1.†b FDR: false discovery rate (p < 0.05). STD: standard diet; CAF: cafeteria diet; GSPE: grape seed proanthocyanidin extract; time of the day; ZT0: VH or GSPE time administration (when light was turned on); ZT12: VH or GSPE time administration (when light was turned off). | ||||||||||||||||||
Amino acids metabolism | ||||||||||||||||||
Leucine | 0.07 ± 0.007 | 0.07 ± 0.009 | 0.07 ± 0.007 | 0.06 ± 0.009t | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.006* | 0.06 ± 0.01#t | 0.05 ± 0.008*t | 0.08 ± 0.007$ | 0.07 ± 0.008 | 0.06 ± 0.02$t | 0.05 ± 0.01t | 0.07 ± 0.007#$ | 0.07 ± 0.007 | 0.04 ± 0.007#$t | 0.05 ± 0.002t | 2.97 × 10−15 | 0.01 |
Tyrosine | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.03 ± 0.007 | 0.02 ± 0.003t | 0.02 ± 0.008t | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.03 ± 0.006 | 0.02 ± 0.005t | 0.02 ± 0.002t | 0.04 ± 0.005$ | 0.04 ± 0.004$ | 0.03 ± 0.007t | 0.03 ± 0.004t | 0.04 ± 0.007$ | 0.03 ± 0.004$ | 0.03 ± 0.004$t | 0.03 ± 0.004$t | 7.15 × 10−15 | 0.01 |
Lysine | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.008*t | 0.09 ± 0.008 | 0.09 ± 0.007 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01*t | 0.08 ± 0.008 | 0.08 ± 0.01$ | 0.07 ± 0.009$t | 0.06 ± 0.009$ | 0.07 ± 0.008#$ | 0.09 ± 0.007* | 0.05 ± 0.01#t | 0.06 ± 0.004$t | 5.99 × 10−14 | 0.01 |
Phenylalanine | 0.07 ± 0.005 | 0.07 ± 0.004 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.008 | 0.07 ± 0.007 | 0.07 ± 0.005 | 0.07 ± 0.005 | 0.07 ± 0.006 | 0.09 ± 0.01$ | 0.1 ± 0.02$ | 0.08 ± 0.007t | 0.09 ± 0.01*t | 0.07 ± 0.006# | 0.07 ± 0.006# | 0.07 ± 0.007# | 0.07 ± 0.003# | 2.34 × 10−12 | 0.01 |
Isoleucine | 0.05 ± 0.004 | 0.05 ± 0.009 | 0.05 ± 0.005 | 0.04 ± 0.008*t | 0.06 ± 0.009 | 0.05 ± 0.005* | 0.04 ± 0.008t | 0.03 ± 0.006*t | 0.06 ± 0.006 | 0.05 ± 0.008 | 0.05 ± 0.009t | 0.04 ± 0.006t | 0.05 ± 0.006#$ | 0.05 ± 0.006 | 0.03 ± 0.005#$t | 0.04 ± 0.002t | 2.52 × 10−11 | 0.01 |
Alanine | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.03t | 0.15 ± 0.03t | 0.25 ± 0.04# | 0.27 ± 0.04# | 0.2 ± 0.04#t | 0.18 ± 0.04t | 0.25 ± 0.02$ | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02t | 0.18 ± 0.03t | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.23 ± 0.03$ | 0.18 ± 0.06t | 0.17 ± 0.008$t | 3.54 × 10−10 | 0.02 |
Valine | 0.09 ± 0.009 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.007 | 0.08 ± 0.01*t | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.009* | 0.08 ± 0.01t | 0.07 ± 0.009*t | 0.1 ± 0.01$ | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02t | 0.07 ± 0.01t | 0.08 ± 0.01#$ | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.008#$t | 0.06 ± 0.005t | 4.08 × 10−10 | 0.02 |
Tryptophan | 0.06 ± 0.005 | 0.06 ± 0.009 | 0.06 ± 0.005 | 0.06 ± 0.008 | 0.05 ± 0.008# | 0.05 ± 0.007# | 0.05 ± 0.003# | 0.05 ± 0.007# | 0.06 ± 0.004 | 0.05 ± 0.003*$ | 0.05 ± 0.01$ | 0.04 ± 0.004*$ | 0.05 ± 0.004# | 0.05 ± 0.007 | 0.04 ± 0.006#$ | 0.04 ± 0.005 | 2.76 × 10−7 | 0.02 |
Glycine | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.007 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.008# | 0.07 ± 0.01# | 0.08 ± 0.009# | 0.08 ± 0.007# | 0.11 ± 0.009$ | 0.11 ± 0.01$ | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.009 | 0.08 ± 0.009# | 0.09 ± 0.01*# | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.01$ | 1.35 × 10−6 | 0.03 |
Histidine | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.03 ± 0.006 | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.04 ± 0.003$ | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.003t | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.004# | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.003 | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 1.00 × 10−4 | 0.03 |
Glutamine | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.04t | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.04$ | 0.28 ± 0.04$ | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.04$ | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.01$* | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.02$ | 1.17 × 10−4 | 0.03 |
Glutamate | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.009 | 0.05 ± 0.006 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.008# | 0.07 ± 0.008 | 0.06 ± 0.01t | 0.05 ± 0.007t | 0.07 ± 0.006$ | 0.06 ± 0.005 | 0.05 ± 0.009t | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01#$ | 0.06 ± 0.006 | 0.06 ± 0.006$ | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 1.70 × 10−3 | 0.04 |
Glycolysis | ||||||||||||||||||
Glucose | 1.68 ± 0.26 | 1.66 ± 0.1 | 1.79 ± 0.16 | 1.68 ± 0.25 | 1.67 ± 0.2 | 1.78 ± 0.18 | 1.84 ± 0.13t | 1.81 ± 0.13 | 1.94 ± 0.12$ | 1.82 ± 0.12 | 1.88 ± 0.21 | 1.85 ± 0.12 | 1.66 ± 0.11# | 1.84 ± 0.11* | 1.89 ± 0.19t$ | 1.82 ± 0.06 | 9.05 × 10−3 | 0.04 |
Pyruvate | 0.02 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.007 | 0.02 ± 0.007 | 0.02 ± 0.007 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.009 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.02 ± 0.004 | 0.02 ± 0.006 | 0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.02 ± 0.007$ | 0.02 ± 0.003$ | 0.02 ± 0.007 | 0.02 ± 0.003 | 5.88 × 10−4 | 0.04 |
Lactate | 0.84 ± 0.17 | 1.02 ± 0.42 | 0.94 ± 0.27 | 1.11 ± 0.26 | 0.87 ± 0.14 | 1.06 ± 0.37 | 1.04 ± 0.35 | 0.99 ± 0.28 | 0.93 ± 0.14 | 0.83 ± 0.19 | 1 ± 0.23 | 0.97 ± 0.23 | 0.88 ± 0.25 | 0.9 ± 0.23 | 0.92 ± 0.48 | 0.93 ± 0.37 | 9.15 × 10−1 | 0.05 |
Lipid metabolism | ||||||||||||||||||
ARA + EPA | 10.08 ± 0.56 | 10.77 ± 1.03 | 10.91 ± 1.37 | 10.98 ± 1.46 | 7.1 ± 0.86# | 8.29 ± 0.62*# | 8.98 ± 0.53#t | 8.13 ± 2.11# | 6.99 ± 0.53$ | 7.23 ± 0.67$ | 7.6 ± 0.43$ | 7.36 ± 0.96$ | 8.34 ± 1.18$# | 7.87 ± 1.06 | 7.75 ± 0.88 | 8.48 ± 0.61# | 2.35 × 10−17 | 0.003 |
Triglycerides | 6.36 ± 1.16 | 7.34 ± 2.85 | 3.78 ± 0.72 | 3.65 ± 0.85 | 16.33 ± 10.38# | 15.13 ± 4.68 | 10.69 ± 5.07 | 11.66 ± 6.05 | 10.33 ± 3.58 | 10.91 ± 2.85 | 5.12 ± 2.34 | 7.86 ± 2.34 | 42.8 ± 20.92$# | 39.57 ± 8.26#$ | 27.33 ± 17.92#$t | 25.36 ± 6.46#$t | 5.65 × 10−17 | 0.004 |
Free cholesterol | 1.5 ± 0.16 | 1.7 ± 0.1* | 1.65 ± 0.18 | 1.74 ± 0.16 | 1.13 ± 0.08# | 1.3 ± 0.1*# | 1.31 ± 0.1#t | 1.29 ± 0.25# | 1.41 ± 0.11 | 1.26 ± 0.13*$ | 1.61 ± 0.14t | 1.22 ± 0.15*$ | 1.63 ± 0.15#$ | 1.5 ± 0.17#$ | 1.47 ± 0.18#$t | 1.48 ± 0.07#$ | 3.48 × 10−16 | 0.005 |
Oleic acid | 14.56 ± 2.67 | 25.25 ± 27.06 | 10.37 ± 1.41 | 10.2 ± 1.65 | 35.17 ± 21.03# | 33.27 ± 10.54 | 23.17 ± 9.96 | 26.55 ± 13.5 | 20.04 ± 3.99 | 19.38 ± 5.15 | 11.83 ± 2.5 | 14.27 ± 3.37 | 82.06 ± 38.98#$ | 77.02 ± 21.36#$ | 53.49 ± 36.6#$t | 48.29 ± 12.08#$t | 3.83 × 10−16 | 0.007 |
MUFAs | 27.43 ± 1.68 | 40.45 ± 37.47 | 23.13 ± 3.55 | 21.95 ± 2.6 | 47.05 ± 26.29 | 43.8 ± 11.49 | 31.38 ± 10.68 | 31.89 ± 14.3 | 31.6 ± 6.82 | 29.17 ± 6.3 | 22.84 ± 3.78 | 23.45 ± 3.35 | 117.79 ± 54.14#$ | 111.54 ± 26.44#$ | 74.05 ± 56.17#$t | 65.47 ± 15.26#$t | 7.47 × 10−16 | 0.008 |
Linoleic acid | 9.11 ± 0.73 | 11.54 ± 8.66 | 7.25 ± 1.25 | 6.72 ± 0.76 | 10.81 ± 5.09 | 11.15 ± 2.16 | 7.76 ± 2.8 | 6.87 ± 2.41 | 10.76 ± 3.56 | 11.39 ± 2.5 | 7.87 ± 2.08 | 10.01 ± 1.4 | 29.24 ± 13.19#$ | 28.5 ± 3.94#$ | 19.58 ± 14.11#$t | 17.19 ± 3.15$#t | 1.26 × 10−15 | 0.009 |
Total fatty acids | 94.21 ± 6.51 | 125.82 ± 43.9* | 97.22 ± 6.26 | 104.15 ± 8.02 | 103.87 ± 30.07 | 107.7 ± 13.49 | 93.85 ± 10.92 | 104.81 ± 23.49 | 106.26 ± 5.62 | 96.08 ± 7.94 | 109.86 ± 5.54 | 87.16 ± 6.74 | 204.61 ± 65.74#$ | 178.93 ± 34.39#$ | 149.77 ± 63.15#$t | 135.87 ± 15.84#$t | 1.62 × 10−13 | 0.01 |
Diglycerides | 0.45 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.25* | 0.57 ± 0.14 | 0.39 ± 0.15 | 0.37 ± 0.14 | 0.42 ± 0.11 | 0.37 ± 0.06# | 0.49 ± 0.26 | 0.35 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.11 | 0.33 ± 0.07$ | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.33$# | 0.82 ± 0.17$# | 0.73 ± 0.3$# | 0.67 ± 0.08$# | 8.88 × 10−12 | 0.02 |
DHA | 1.41 ± 0.11 | 1.42 ± 0.34 | 1.35 ± 0.21 | 1.2 ± 0.16 | 0.98 ± 0.28# | 1.12 ± 0.16# | 1.11 ± 0.26 | 0.97 ± 0.32 | 1.13 ± 0.36$ | 1.35 ± 0.27 | 0.9 ± 0.21$t | 1.09 ± 0.11 | 1.81 ± 0.48#$ | 1.5 ± 0.16*$ | 1.45 ± 0.32#$t | 1.46 ± 0.28#$ | 8.50 × 10−9 | 0.02 |
PUFAs | 34.31 ± 1.71 | 35.21 ± 5.78 | 35.77 ± 5.74 | 34.01 ± 4.62 | 29.05 ± 4.39 | 34.27 ± 3.27 | 36.11 ± 4.99t | 32.4 ± 10.57 | 27.71 ± 4.37$ | 25.74 ± 3.86$ | 27.75 ± 2.39$ | 26.47 ± 3.49$ | 41.95 ± 7.75#$ | 37.78 ± 6.34# | 38.98 ± 6.67# | 40.46 ± 5.12#$ | 1.31 × 10−8 | 0.02 |
Glycerol | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.03# | 0.12 ± 0.03# | 0.09 ± 0.02# | 0.09 ± 0.02t | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02$ | 0.08 ± 0.02$ | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02# | 2.94 × 10−7 | 0.03 |
Total phospholipids | 5.38 ± 0.74 | 5.81 ± 1.08 | 5.86 ± 0.97 | 5.75 ± 0.6 | 5.06 ± 0.8 | 5.73 ± 0.74 | 5.74 ± 0.82 | 5.34 ± 1.66 | 4.74 ± 0.46 | 4.07 ± 0.64$ | 4.78 ± 0.6$ | 4.64 ± 0.63$ | 7.4 ± 1.53$# | 6.62 ± 1.01# | 5.89 ± 1.46#t | 5.9 ± 0.79# | 4.82 × 10−7 | 0.03 |
Esterified cholesterol | 9.31 ± 1.04 | 8.46 ± 0.67 | 9.47 ± 1.92 | 8.75 ± 1.09 | 6.66 ± 1.11# | 7.83 ± 0.84 | 8.28 ± 0.73#t | 6.56 ± 2.03*#t | 7.46 ± 1$ | 6.21 ± 1.12$ | 7.72 ± 1.45$ | 7.22 ± 1.62$ | 7.13 ± 1.8 | 6.52 ± 1.8$ | 6.01 ± 1.09$# | 6.49 ± 1.01 | 1.31 × 10−6 | 0.03 |
Cholesterol | 17.21 ± 2 | 16.28 ± 1.14 | 17.97 ± 3.46 | 16.81 ± 1.9 | 12.41 ± 1.6# | 14.76 ± 1.43* | 14.81 ± 1.18#t | 12.51 ± 3.92*#t | 13.95 ± 1.43$ | 11.63 ± 1.96*$ | 14.46 ± 2.45$ | 12.77 ± 2.67*$ | 15.88 ± 2.76$ | 14.21 ± 2.79# | 12.85 ± 2.71t | 13.56 ± 1.52 | 1.46 × 10−6 | 0.03 |
Acetate | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.004 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.009 | 0.08 ± 0.01# | 0.08 ± 0.009 | 0.08 ± 0.009 | 0.07 ± 0.008 | 0.1 ± 0.01* | 0.09 ± 0.01t | 0.07 ± 0.007*$t | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01# | 0.07 ± 0.01#$t | 0.07 ± 0.01$ | 3.48 × 10−5 | 0.04 |
Choline metabolism | ||||||||||||||||||
Choline | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.002t | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001t | 0.007 ± 0.001$ | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.008 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001# | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001# | 0.007 ± 0.002 | 3.02 × 10−5 | 0.03 |
Betaine | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 0.2 ± 0.03# | 0.18 ± 0.03# | 0.22 ± 0.04# | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.21 ± 0.05# | 0.2 ± 0.03# | 0.18 ± 0.03# | 0.2 ± 0.03# | 3.02 × 10−8 | 0.03 |
N,N-Dimethylglycine | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.0005 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 1.27 × 10−1 | 0.05 |
Nucleotide biosynthesis | ||||||||||||||||||
Formate | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.06*# | 0.3 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.03# | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02*$ | 0.24 ± 0.01$t | 0.13 ± 0.01*$ | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.01#$ | 0.26 ± 0.03$ | 0.28 ± 0.03#$ | 1.18 × 10−21 | 0.001 |
Bile salt | ||||||||||||||||||
Cholate | 0.01 ± 0.0003 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.0003 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.008 ± 0.001$ | 0.009 ± 0.001* | 0.008 ± 0.001$ | 0.007 ± 0.001*t$ | 0.01 ± 0.001# | 0.01 ± 0.001# | 0.01 ± 0.001# | 0.01 ± 0.001# | 7.16 × 10−4 | 0.04 |
In STD-fed females, GSPE administered at ZT0 did not exert any effect on amino acids levels. However, when GSPE was administered at ZT12, Lys, Ile and Val levels were significantly decreased compared to its respective control. GSPE in CAF-fed females significant decreased Leu, Ile and Val levels compared to CAF females received with VH at both ZT0 and ZT12. Lys levels were decreased only by GSPE at ZT12, showing a time-of-day effect not observed in control rats. On the other hand, in STD-fed males, the amino acids Leu, Tyr, Lys, Phe, Ile, Ala, Val, His and Glu were decreased at night. GSPE treatment led to a decrease of Trp at both ZT0 and ZT12, and an increase of Phe only when it was administered at ZT12. When male rats were fed a CAF diet, a similar time-of-day effect pattern was observed in amino acid levels in VH groups, significantly decreasing at night (Leu, Tyr, Lys, Ile, Ala and Val). However, GSPE effect only was found when it was administered at ZT0, increasing Lys, Gly and Gln levels (Table 3).
GSPE effect was different according to the diet, sex and time of administration (Table 3). When GSPE was administered at ZT0 in STD-fed females, higher levels of free cholesterol, total fatty acids and diglycerides were observed compared to its respective control rats. In CAF-female rats, GSPE administered at ZT0 increased ARA + EPA, free cholesterol and cholesterol levels. However, GSPE decreased levels of esterified cholesterol and cholesterol when it was administered at ZT12 in female CAF rats compared to its respective control. In STD-fed males GSPE significantly decreased free and total cholesterol at ZT0 and ZT12, while increased acetate at ZT0. In males CAF rats, GSPE decreased DHA only at ZT0, showing lower effect than in female CAF rats.
The circadian clock system can be disturbed by obesogenic diets, affecting in turn to hormone and serum metabolites rhythmicity12,58 and contributing to the development of metabolic disorders.59 Additionally, obesogenic diets do not act in the same manner in both sexes.60,61 For instance, plasma parameters associated with metabolic syndrome, such as leptin and insulin, are modulated in a sex-specific manner by obesogenic diets.62 This fact could be explained because circadian rhythms also exhibit differences between females and males, showing differences in the clock gene expressions.15 In this regard, this study showed that the clock gene expressions, as well as metabolite levels showed a time-of-day effect, differently influenced by the diet in a sex-dependent manner. These changes observed in the clock genes expressions were significantly correlated with melatonin and different serum metabolites. Melatonin levels, positively correlated with the relative expression of Per2, being in concordance with other studies in which the increase of melatonin raise the expression of Per2 in both SCN and pituitary gland.63 Furthermore, melatonin levels and Per2 expression were higher at night independently of health condition or sex, since the secretion of melatonin by the pineal gland occurs at night under the control of the light–dark cycles.64 Thus, pineal gland and central clock tissue interact with each other;63 SCN relays photoperiodic information through the retina to the pineal gland via sympathetic nervous system, and based on the information provided by the SCN, the pineal gland either up- or down-regulates the production of melatonin.65 In turn, melatonin signal impacts the function of the SCN, regulating the central clock genes and synchronize physiological activities.66 Interestingly, STD-fed males showed higher melatonin levels, and in consequence higher expression of Per2, compared to STD-fed females. These results could be associated with the fact that in women melatonin cycle has a higher amplitude and the secretion peak appears earlier than in males.67 Therefore, at ZT15 (at night) the highest peak of melatonin secretion may have already occurred in females, whereas in males this process is occurring in that point of time. Moreover, hypersecretion during metabolic syndrome, due to an increase of the sympathetic activity in the SCN,68 could explain the higher levels of this hormone showed by CAF-fed females compared to STD-fed females.
Amino acids, lipid and choline metabolism was also affected depending on the time-of-day, diet and sex. These results were expected since metabolomic profiles vary due to health status, sex and diurnal variations,69 as it is discussed above. Regarding to the sex differences, the molecular mechanisms which explain them remain largely unidentified, although it seems that sex hormones play an important role. Hence, it has been described that estrogen in women and androgen in men impact on the fatty acid, triglyceride, and cholesterol metabolism.70 Furthermore, these differences by sex could be explained by the different expressions of the enzymes for fatty acids synthesis and oxidation, which have been reported to be more active in females and in males, respectively.71 The sexual dimorphism in the amino acid metabolism has not been elucidated yet, but in the same manner, sex hormones appear to be crucial, promoting differences in musculature and in turn, in the protein metabolism.72,73 Serum metabolites were also correlated with changes in clock gene expressions. Amino acids and other metabolites such as betain, choline, DAG, glycerol and free cholesterol were significantly correlated with the central clock genes, indicating that circadian clocks can control the metabolism in a time-of-day-dependent manner.21,26 Among amino acids, it is worth highlighting the changes observed in the levels of Trp, and its negative correlation with Per2. Trp is an essential amino acid supplied by diet. It can be metabolized into different metabolites in both the gut microbiota and tissue cells, being a precursor of a large number of biologically active metabolites.74 Trp is the sole precursor of the serotonin synthesis in the brain, and subsequently, of the melatonin hormone in the pineal gland.75 However, over 90% of serotonin is located in the gastrointestinal tract, and it is produced from enterochromaffin cells. Moreover, more than 90% of total Trp is catabolized, via the kynurenine pathway, into kynurenine in the liver, which can be further metabolized into kynurenic acid and quinolinic acid (QUIN) called kynurenine (inflammatory mediators capable of reach the brain).76 Finally, QUIN can be converted into nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) that play a key role in the energy homeostasis,76 following 24 h rhythmicity.77 Also, a small amount of Trp is converted by gut microbiota into indole and its derivatives, which have exhibited protective effects.78 In addition, Trp metabolism has been shown to follow circadian/diurnal oscillations, and Trp and their derived are believed to modulate circadian rhythms via multiple molecular mechanism.79 Along this line, our results show lower levels of Trp in healthy females and males rats at night, which could be associated with the increased levels of melatonin at that point. Furthermore, healthy males showed higher levels of Trp compared to females, showing also higher levels of melatonin as it was commented above. However, in females and obese rats, Trp levels decrease at both in the morning and at night, losing the rhythmicity. This fact could be explained by an overactivation of the kynurenine pathway since diseases characterized by a low grade-inflammation and a dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, such as obesity show higher levels of kynurenine.74 Nevertheless, the decrease of Trp in the morning was not linked to higher melatonin level in the morning. In this regard, clock genes were studied only in two time points. Therefore, a further study to evaluate rhythmicity may be necessary to obtain more differences or significant correlations in comparison with the current results. Moreover, further studies would be needed to evaluate the Trp metabolism and stablish how Trp and its derivate could modulate circadian system, promoting a good health state, evaluating also the gut microbiota composition and their produced metabolites, which is essential in the homeostasis maintenance.80,81
GSPE has been shown to modulate clock genes in a time-of-day-dependent manner in liver43 and in the adipose tissue44 in male rats to prevent the obesity development. GSPE could therefore modulate also central clock genes and its effect on the circadian clocks may influence several metabolic pathways to ameliorate obesity disease, and this could be reflected in the serum metabolic profiles. The current study shows that GSPE impacts on the central clocks and metabolome and, for the first time to our knowledge, reports that GSPE effects not only are influence by the time of day but also are strongly influenced by the health condition and sex. In this regard, these results showed that GSPE influence the expression pattern of clock genes in the hypothalamus differently in healthy and obesogenic conditions in a sex-specific manner. Particularly, GSPE influenced clock, Per1 and Per2 at night in STD females, whereas in CAF females, GSPE affected the expression of Bmal1 and Cry in the morning. Furthermore, GSPE effects on clock genes in STD males were found at both morning and night, whereas in CAF males no GSPE effects on clock genes were found. Thus, these results indicate that ability of PAs to modulate the hypothalamic clock genes depends largely on the time of administration and importantly on the diet and sex. Interestingly, in this case, GSPE did not affect melatonin hormone levels, in contrast to another acute study in which GSPE modulated plasma melatonin levels when the extract was administered in the morning.41 However, the different strain of rats used, the lower dose of GSPE administered in this study (versus 250 mg kg−1) and the different time points in which melatonin was measured, may explain this discrepancy. Furthermore, Trp levels were also not altered significantly by GSPE, which could also explain why no differences in melatonin levels are observed by GSPE. To date, a relationship between melatonin and bioactive compounds such as PAs has not yet been established, so it would be interesting to continue investigating in this field to elucidate the role of clock genes and melatonin as well as the derived-melatonin metabolites in the metabolome and whether they can be modulated by proanthocyanidin-rich extracts. Moreover, as GSPE modulates gut microbiota composition,82 it would be interesting to advance in the study of its composition and the metabolites derives from it, and how it may regulate the host homeostasis impacting on the circadian rhythms.
It has been recently reported that GSPE administration at night restore the rhythmic metabolism of Ala, aspartate (Asp) and Glu in male CAF-fed rats.83 The changes observed in amino acids levels by GSPE according to the time-of-day could be explained due to the different clock gene expressions in the hypothalamus. Amino acids and skeletal muscle clock genes are intimately linked,84 and observational studies showed a link between diurnal variations in amino acid plasma concentrations and insulin resistance and diabetes.85,86 Hence, the beneficial effect of GSPE on insulin resistance and obesity-related disorders may depends on the time of administration, sex and diet. In the same way, lipid metabolism was influenced by the time of GSPE administration according to the diet and sex. In this case, GSPE administered at night to CAF-fed females had a beneficial effect, decreasing cholesterol, total fatty acids and diglycerid levels. Interestingly, when GSPE was administered in the morning to both STD- and CAF-fed female rats, GSPE effects were detrimental, increasing the levels of these lipid metabolites. In males, the effect of GSPE administration was less remarkable. CAF-fed male rats only showing lower DHA levels in the morning, whereas GSPE decreased free and total cholesterol levels in STD-fed males when it was administered both in the morning and at night. These findings indicate that beneficial GSPE effects are strongly influenced by the time of the day in which it is administered, being sex and health status two key factors in its functionality. It is described that cholesterol is synthetized following a circadian rhythmicity in the liver thought the circadian expression of HMG-CoA.87 Moreover, enzymes that regulate fatty acids synthesis also present rhythmic expression patterns.88 Therefore, to get beneficial effects, GSPE may act on these pathways, being important the time of administration according to the circadian expression patterns of the enzymes involved. Furthermore, it has been reported that GSPE repress the expression of the clock gene Cry in the inguinal WAT in males rats only at night, which was associated with a lower adiposity in this tissue,44 suggesting that GSPE is influenced by the circadian rhythms. Cholate levels were also affected by GSPE administration time in a diet and sex-dependent manner. Cholate as a primary bile acids, is synthetized from cholesterol via two major pathways in hepatocytes.89 The key enzyme, cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), and the serum levels of total bile acids in mice have been shown to follow diurnal rhythmicity, playing the circadian rhythms a crucial role in the maintenance of bile acid homeostasis.24,90 In fact, it has been reported that the alteration of hepatic clock gene expressions by a HFD or restringing feeding, disrupts bile acid metabolism and trigger metabolic diseases.91 Moreover, CYP7A1 and transporters involved in bile acid homeostasis display significant sex differences.92 Additionally, the bile acid metabolism is closely linked with the gut microbiota composition,93 which is also influenced by many factors including biological rhythms,94,95 diet,96 or sex.97 A recent study has shown that an apple polyphenol extract may modulate bile acid metabolism and gut microbiota via clock genes regulation.98 Accordingly, it has been recently described by our group, using the same experimental design, that the bioavailability of GSPE, especially the microbiota-derived metabolites, depends on the time of administration and the sex of the animals.45 In this context, significant higher overall levels of microbial colonic metabolites were found when GSPE was administered in the morning in CAF-fed rats, increasing these colonic metabolites in females rats fed with CAF compared to male rats, and being this effect no observed in STD-fed rats.45 Hence, gut microbiota play an important role in the metabolism of these PAs, exerting their derived metabolites several functions.99–101 Furthermore, gut microbiota has been also demonstrate to follow a diurnal rhythmicity102 and to be intrinsically influence by sex,97,103 so it may be a key factor in the mechanism of GSPE. Therefore, futures studies about the gut microbiota composition and their derived colonic metabolites bioactivities would be necessary to further evaluate the effects of GSPE on the metabolome and its relationship with circadian clocks. Therefore, although further studies are needed, these findings contribute to a better understanding the mechanism by which PAs may prevent and ameliorate metabolic-related disorders, adding knowledge in the chrononutrition field, which are currently continuously growing.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fo01551c |
‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |