Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Regeneration of atomic Ag sites over commercial γ-aluminas by oxidative dispersion of Ag metal particles

Hiroe Kubota , Shinya Mine , Takashi Toyao and Ken-ichi Shimizu *
Institute for Catalysis, Hokkaido University, N-21, W-10, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan. E-mail: kshimizu@cat.hokudai.ac.jp

Received 14th November 2022 , Accepted 17th January 2023

First published on 17th January 2023


Abstract

Ag(3 wt%)-loaded γ-Al2O3 (Ag/Al2O3) catalysts were prepared using four types of commercially available alumina powders (CTB, PUR, VGL, and CFF). Based on the support, the activity of these catalysts for the H2-assisted selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3 or C3H6 decreased in the order CTB > PUR > VGL > CFF. After sintering treatment (H2 reduction at 800 °C), the particle size of the Ag metal nanoparticles (NPs) changed and was found to be correlated with the catalytic activity (CTB < PUR < VGL < CFF). After re-oxidation of H2-reduced Ag/Al2O3 at 500 °C, the in situ infrared (IR) spectra showed negative bands at 3762 cm−1 due to the HO-μ1-AlVI site, where the band intensity increased in the order CTB > PUR > VGL > CFF. IR study of pyridine adsorbed on Ag-free γ-Al2O3 showed that the number of strong Lewis acid sites (unsaturated AlIV3+) increased in the same order, CTB > PUR > VGL > CFF, and the number of strong Lewis acid sites decreased when Ag was loaded on the supports. In situ X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and UV-vis studies of Ag/Al2O3 sintered under NO + O2 at 400 °C showed oxidative redispersion of the Ag metal NPs to regenerate atomic Ag(I) sites. The amount of redispersed Ag metal and the initial rates of redispersion estimated from the in situ UV-vis results changed in the following order: CTB > PUR > VGL > CFF. These results suggest that the HO-μ1-AlVI site adjacent to the unsaturated AlIV3+ site on γ-Al2O3 is the anchoring site of the atomic Ag species, and the sintering resistance of Ag/Al2O3 increases with the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites. During H2-assisted SCR, where both H2 and NO + O2 were co-fed to the catalysts, the number of highly dispersed Ag species (active sites) increased with the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites; hence, NO conversion increased with the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites on the support. The present results provide molecular-level insights into the design of sintering-resistant Ag/Al2O3 catalysts for SCR.


1. Introduction

γ-Alumina-supported silver (Ag/Al2O3) catalysts have long been studied as promising catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx by hydrocarbons (HC-SCR).1–5 HC-SCR by Ag/Al2O3 has been once commercialized for NOx removal from diesel exhaust.5 It is well known that H2 promotes the activity of Ag/Al2O3 for NH3-SCR and HC-SCR,6–13 and many studies have focused on H2-assisted SCR by NH3 (H2-NH3-SCR)14–20 or by HC (H2-HC-SCR).6–13 After a long debate on the active Ag species in HC-SCR reactions,1,6,13,20 it was concluded that isolated Ag(I) sites are indispensable for achieving high-performance Ag/Al2O3 catalysts for SCR.13 Hence, Ag/Al2O3 for HC-SCR can be regarded as a rare example of a commercialized single-atom catalyst (SAC). Small Agnδ+ clusters generated from the in situ reduction of Ag(I) species by H2 or HCs during SCR promoted the reaction under certain conditions, whereas Ag metal nanoparticles (NPs) had an adverse effect on NOx conversion as they promoted the non-selective oxidation of reductants.17,20 Our previous study on H2-NH3-SCR14–20 showed that isolated Ag(I) sites and small Agnδ+ clusters, which coexist under the reaction conditions, play important roles. Previous reports have suggested that compared to other transition metals, supported single-atom Ag and small Ag clusters are more susceptible to sintering at lower temperatures.21–24 In commercial SCR systems, Ag/Al2O3 catalysts are exposed to high-temperature conditions, which could result in catalyst deactivation due to sintering of the isolated Ag(I) species to Ag metal NPs. Redispersion of the aggregated Ag NPs is a potential strategy for the regeneration of sintered Ag/Al2O3 catalysts. We previously reported the oxidative dispersion of large Ag metal NPs to isolated Ag(I) cations on θ-Al2O3.25 However, the precise dispersion mechanism and the nature of the anchoring sites remain elusive.

The structures of the metal anchoring sites on γ-Al2O3 were discussed.26,27 Among various sites, recent studies employing Al nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy28–32 exclusively proposed the pentacoordinated AlV3+ site as anchoring sites of various metal clusters. However, Al NMR is not a sufficient tool for complete characterization of the anchoring sites as this technique is not suitable for identification of other sites such as surface octahedral (AlVI3+) and tetrahedral Al (AlIV3+) sites and Al–OH sites. In this regard, infrared (IR) spectroscopy using basic probe molecules33–39 is useful for characterizing surface Al sites with different coordination environments (AlVI3+, AlV3+, and AlIV3+) and different Al–OH groups.40,41 Based on NH3-IR study on Ag/γ-Al2O3 and γ-Al2O3, Zeng et al.13 proposed that the terminal hydroxyl (OH) groups on the (100) surface are the anchoring sites of the isolated Ag(I) cations, which act as catalytic sites for H2-assisted HC-SCR. We recently studied the reversible structural transformation between atomic Ag(I) and large Ag metal NPs on a Ag/Al2O3 catalyst using various in situ spectroscopic techniques, ex situ microscopy, and theoretical calculations.42 The on-top OH group on octahedral Al (HO-μ1-AlVI) adjacent to the unsaturated AlIV3+ site anchors isolated Ag+ in the form of AgO-μ1-AlVI, which can be converted to Ag metal NPs and HO-μ1-AlVI during sintering under H2. Thereafter, under NO + O2, the Ag metal NPs and HO-μ1-AlVI react to regenerate dispersed single-atom AgO-μ1-AlVI. Because the SCR activity of Ag/Al2O3 depends strongly on the type of Al2O3 source,13 we hypothesized that the SCR activity of Ag/Al2O3 prepared with different alumina samples depends on the number of anchoring sites on the alumina samples.

Herein, we prepare Ag/Al2O3 catalysts with four types of commercial alumina and investigate the relationships between the relative number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites and (1) the number of unsaturated AlIV3+ sites, (2) the sintering resistance of Ag/Al2O3, (3) the rate of Ag redispersion, and (4) the catalytic activity of Ag/Al2O3. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, and infrared (IR) spectroscopy are employed to quantify these properties. We propose that our anchoring site model, the HO-μ1-AlVI site adjacent to the unsaturated AlIV3+ site, is a universal model for different alumina samples and that the SCR activity of Ag/Al2O3 increases with an increase in the number of anchoring sites.

2. Experimental methods

Preparation and characterization of catalysts

Ag/Al2O3 catalysts were prepared using an impregnation method, and four types of γ-AlOOH (CTB, PUR, VGL, and CFF in Table 1) were impregnated with an aqueous solution of AgNO3, followed by evaporation to dryness at 60 °C, drying at 100 °C for 12 h, and calcination in air at 600 °C for 1 h. The impurities of CTB and PUR are less than 0.002%. The Ag/Al2O3 catalysts are designated as Agx/Al2O3 or Agx/CTB, where x denotes the Ag loading amount (wt%). γ-Al2O3 was prepared by calcination of γ-AlOOH at 600 °C (1 h).
Table 1 Properties of commercially available alumina and investigated catalysts
Sample Product name Manufacturer S BET Phaseb NO conversion in H2-NH3-SCRc [%] NO conversion in H2-C3H6-SCRc [%]
a BET surface area (m2 g−1) of γ-Al2O3 after calcination at 600 °C. b Crystal phase of alumina estimated by XRD. c NO conversion (%) by Ag(3 wt%)-loaded Al2O3 (40 mg) for H2-NH3-SCR at 150 °C and H2-C3H6-SCR at 400 °C. d γ-Al2O3 was the main phase, but XRD lines corresponding to θ and α-Al2O3 were observed as minor phases.
CTB Catapal® B Sasol 218 γ 55 34
PUR Puralox® SBa 200 Sasol 200 γ 38 30
VGL Versal-Alumina VGL-15 UOP 166 γ 13 17
CFF CFF-NP005-50 chemPUR 135 γ, (θ, α)d 13 14


X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Rigaku MiniFlex II/AP diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation. Fig. S1 shows XRD patterns of the fresh Ag(3 wt%)-loaded Al2O3 after calcination at 600 °C. The result shows the absence of Ag metal NPs on Ag(3)/CTB and Ag(3)/PUR. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) data were acquired using a JEOL JEM-2200FS electron microscope. 27Al magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR (27Al NMR) measurements were performed on a Bruker DSX-300 spectrometer operating at 300 MHz with a 4 mm rotor. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of the γ-Al2O3 samples were determined by N2 adsorption using an Autosorb 6AG instrument (Yuasa Ionics Co., Ltd., Japan).

In situ spectroscopy

In situ diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Jasco V-750 UV-vis spectrometer. The sintered Ag3/Al2O3 (15 mg) catalyst powder was placed in a diffuse reflectance cell with a quartz window connected to a gas flow system (100 mL min−1). The light source was directed to the center of the integrating sphere through an optical fiber. BaSO4 was used to collect background spectra. The reflectance was converted to the Kubelka–Munk function.

In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform (DRIFT) spectra of the OH stretching region of the powder sample (ca. 40 mg) were recorded on a Jasco FT/IR-4600 instrument (mercury cadmium telluride detector) equipped with an in situ flow cell with a CaF2 window. In situ IR spectra of the adsorbed pyridine were recorded in transmission mode using a Jasco FT/IR-4600 spectrometer. A 40 mg self-supporting wafer sample (20 mm ϕ) was mounted on a flow-type quartz IR cell (CaF2 windows) connected to a flow system (100 mL min−1). Twenty spectra were collected at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and averaged to obtain a spectrum. The spectrum of the catalyst wafer, acquired at the measurement temperature under He, was subtracted from each spectrum.

Ag K-edge X-ray absorption spectra were recorded in transmission mode using the BL-14B2 beamline at the SPring-8 synchrotron radiation facility (Harima, Japan). A Si(311) single crystal was used to obtain monochromatic X-ray beams. A self-supporting wafer of the sample (approximately 7 mm ϕ) was placed in an in situ quartz cell under a flow of a gas mixture diluted with He (500 mL min−1) at atmospheric pressure. Normalization and linear combination fitting (LCF) analysis of the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and curve-fitting analysis of the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data were performed using the Athena software package.43 For the LCF analysis, Ag+-exchanged Ag-CHA (Si/Al = 11) and 10 wt% Ag-loaded low-surface-area Al2O3 were used as reference compounds for the isolated Ag(I) and Ag metal NPs, respectively.42 Fourier transformation of the k3-weighted EXAFS data was carried out over the k range of 3–10 Å−1 and R range of 1.05–3.2 Å−1. Curve-fitting analysis was performed using Artemis, and the parameters for each shell were provided by FEFF6.

Catalytic reactions

H2-NH3-SCR (H2 + NO + NH3 + O2) and H2-C3H6-SCR (H2 + NO + C3H6 + O2) were performed using Ag3/Al2O3 powder in a fixed-bed flow reactor (flow rate = 100 mL min−1). The composition of the feed gas, H2/NO/(NH3 or C3H6)/O2/He, was 1%/500 ppm/500 ppm/10%/balance. The concentrations of the feed gas and products were measured using an online IR spectrometer (Jasco FT/IR-4600 with a TGS detector) equipped with a custom-built gas cell. The concentrations of NO, NO2, N2O, C3H6, and NH3 were calculated based on calibration results. The reaction rates were estimated by changing the catalyst loading under conditions where the NO and NH3 conversions were below 30%.

3. Results and discussion

SCR activity and structure of four Ag/Al2O3 catalysts

Four commercial alumina sources (CTB, PUR, VGL, and CFF) with different characteristics were used (Table 1). Ag(3 wt%)-loaded on alumina (designated as Ag3/CTB) was prepared by a conventional impregnation method.42 The NO conversion (Table 1) achieved with these catalysts in the H2-assisted SCR of NO by NH3 and C3H6 was measured at 150 and 400 °C, respectively, using a flow reactor. For both reactions, the NO conversion of Ag-loaded alumina depended on the type of alumina and increased in the order CTB > PUR > VGL ≥ CFF.

The Ag-loaded alumina catalysts were reduced under a 2% H2 flow at 800 °C (0.5 h) to prepare the sintered catalysts. The size distribution of the Ag NPs after sintering was estimated using ex situ TEM (Fig. 1). The mean diameter of the Ag metal NPs after the sintering treatment increased in the order CTB < PUR < VGL < CFF. The results indicate that the resistance to Ag sintering under reductive conditions depends on the type of alumina, and the sintering resistance decreased in the order CTB > PUR > VGL > CFF. This order is consistent with the order of the catalytic activity of Ag/Al2O3 for SCR (Table 1).


image file: d2cy01950g-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Particle size distribution and TEM images of (a) Ag3/CTB, (b) Ag3/PUR, (c) Ag3/VGL, and (d) Ag3/CFF after sintering treatment (2% H2, 800 °C, 0.5 h).

Fig. 2 shows the 27Al NMR spectra of the alumina and Ag-loaded alumina samples dehydrated at 500 °C. To enhance the changes in the spectra caused by the loading of Ag, high-loading (10 wt%) samples were prepared and tested for 27Al NMR measurements. The peaks with chemical shifts centered at 10, 33, and 67 ppm were assigned to AlIV3+, AlV3+, and AlVI3+, respectively. Previous 27Al NMR studies of γ-Al2O3 have established that AlV3+ ions are present only on the first surface layer.29 Upon loading 10 wt% Ag on CTB, the AlV3+ peak of CTB almost disappeared, indicating that some of the surface AlV3+ sites interacted with the Ag species. However, loading 10 wt% Ag on the other alumina samples (PUR, VGL, CFF) did not markedly change the intensity of the AlV3+ signals. These results demonstrate that 27Al NMR is not a powerful method for investigating the anchoring sites of Ag species.


image file: d2cy01950g-f2.tif
Fig. 2 27Al NMR spectra of γ-Al2O3 (black) and Ag(10 wt%)-loaded Al2O3 (blue): (a) CTB, (b) PUR, (c) VGL and (d) CFF. The samples were dehydrated under N2 at 500 °C before the measurements.

Our previous study42 showed that the IR spectra of Ag/Al2O3 in the OH stretching region and pyridine adsorbed on Ag/Al2O3 and Al2O3 are useful for discussing the anchoring site of isolated Ag+ on Al2O3. In brief, when Ag was loaded on Al2O3, the IR peak at 3770 cm−1 assigned to the on-top OH group on octahedral Al (HO-μ1-AlVI)39 became less intense; the intensity of the band at 1621 cm−1 due to strong Lewis acid sites (unsaturated AlIV3+ sites) also declined. Combining the results of STEM and DFT studies and a structural model of γ-Al2O3 in the literature, we concluded that the anchoring sites of the isolated Ag(I) species on γ-Al2O3 are the HO-μ1-AlVI sites on the (100) surface adjacent to the strong Lewis acid (AlIV) sites on the (110) surface.42 Based on the consistent DFT and experimental IR data, it is concluded that the HO-μ1-AlVI site on the (100)–(110) step edge is the anchoring site of Ag. After sintering, the isolated AgO-μ1-AlVI species aggregate to form Ag metal NPs to regenerate the HO-μ1-AlVI sites. In the subsequent oxidative treatment, the Ag metal NPs undergo redispersion to regenerate the original AgO-μ1-AlVI species.42In situ DRIFT analysis of the four Ag/Al2O3 samples after sintering treatment was used for in situ monitoring of the changes in the HO-μ1-AlVI sites during the oxidative redispersion process. First, the sample was reduced in 2% H2 at 500 °C (0.5 h) followed by He purging, and IR spectra of the reduced samples (black lines in Fig. 3a) were obtained. The sample was then oxidized by 10% O2 at 500 °C (0.5 h), and the IR spectra (blue lines in Fig. 3a) were obtained. For the four samples, a negative band centered around 3762 cm−1 appeared after re-oxidation by O2; the intensity of this negative band increased in the order CTB > PUR > VGL > CFF. This order is consistent with the order of the catalytic activity (Table 1) and sintering resistance of supported Ag on alumina (Fig. 1).


image file: d2cy01950g-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) In situ DRIFT spectra of OH stretching on four types of Ag(3 wt%)-loaded Al2O3 after H2 (black) and O2 (blue) treatment at 500 °C. The spectra after O2 treatment were based on the background spectra taken after the H2 reduction. (b) In situ IR spectra of pyridine adsorbed at 200 °C on four types of γ-Al2O3 (black) and Ag3/Al2O3 (red) pre-oxidized at 500 °C in 10% O2/He for 0.5 h.

In separate IR (transmission) experiments, pyridine adsorption on pre-oxidized IR disks of Al2O3 and Ag/Al2O3 was studied at 200 °C. For all samples, the band intensities of pyridine on the strong Lewis acid (AlIV) sites (1621 cm−1) of Ag/Al2O3 (red lines in Fig. 3b) were markedly lower than those of Al2O3 (black lines in Fig. 3b). This suggests that the Ag species in the form of AgO-μ1-AlVI decreased the Lewis acidity of the adjacent AlIV3+ sites because of the electronic effect of the Ag species. Fig. 4a presents a plot of the intensity of the strong Lewis acid (AlIV) sites (1621 cm−1) of the Ag-free Al2O3 samples in Fig. 3bversus the intensity of the negative band of HO-μ1-AlVI (3762 cm−1) observed due to re-oxidation of the sintered Ag/Al2O3 samples (Fig. 3a). A linear relationship was observed, providing additional evidence to support our previously reported conclusion42 that the anchoring sites of Ag on γ-Al2O3 are the HO-μ1-AlVI sites on the (100) surface adjacent to the strong Lewis acid (AlIV) sites on the (110) surface at the (100)–(110) step edge. Fig. 4b presents a plot of the average sizes of the Ag NPs on the Ag/Al2O3 samples after sintering at 800 °C (Fig. 1) versus the intensity of the negative band of HO-μ1-AlVI (Fig. 3a). The size of the Ag metal NPs decreased with an increase in the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites on the alumina surfaces, which demonstrates that the anchored Ag species in the form of AgO-μ1-AlVI play a significant role in the sintering resistance under reductive conditions at high temperatures.


image file: d2cy01950g-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) IR intensity of adsorbed pyridine (Fig. 3b) and (b) average particle size of Ag NPs (Fig. 1) versus IR intensity of negative peak due to HO-μ1-AlVI sites (Fig. 3a) on Ag(3 wt%)-loaded Al2O3.

In situ observation of oxidative dispersion

In situ time-resolved Ag K-edge XANES spectroscopy was used to characterize the structure of the Ag species during oxidative redispersion. Two Ag catalysts loaded on alumina with a relatively large amount (CTB) and a low number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites (VGL), Ag3/CTB and Ag3/VGL, pre-reduced by H2 (800 °C), were exposed to NO + O2 at 500 °C, while monitoring the XANES spectra as a function of time (Fig. 5). The EXAFS features (Fig. 5(a and b) and Table 2) of the sintered Ag3/CTB (9.3 Ag–Ag bonds at 2.78 Å) and Ag3/VGL (7.4 Ag–Ag bonds at 2.82 Å) show the absence of Ag+ species on alumina and the presence of Ag metal NPs as major species. According to the method described in our previous study,42 LCF analysis of the spectra was performed in the energy range of 25[thin space (1/6-em)]500–25[thin space (1/6-em)]650 eV using the spectra of the two reference samples: Ag+ ion-exchanged CHA zeolite for the isolated Ag(I) species and Ag(10 wt%)-loaded low surface area α-, θ-Al2O3 for the Ag metal NPs. LCF analysis of the samples at t = 0 s shows that Ag metal NPs are the dominant Ag species in the sintered catalysts. With an increase in the time of oxidation by NO + O2, the fraction of Ag(I) species increased and that of Ag metal NPs decreased. This indicates that the Ag metal NPs undergo oxidative dispersion to form isolated Ag(I) species. Some of the Ag metal NPs on Ag3/CTB were converted to isolated Ag(I) species within 48 s, whereas the oxidative dispersion was completed in 96 s for Ag3/VGL. This indicates that oxidative redispersion of the Ag metal NPs is faster for alumina with a larger number of surface HO-μ1-AlVI sites (CTB). Oxidation by NO + O2 treatment for 300 s decreased the intensity of the Ag–Ag contribution to the EXAFS peak, accompanied by the appearance of peaks corresponding to Ag–O coordination (Fig. 5(a) and (b) and Table 2). The EXAFS results indicate that some of the Ag metal NPs were converted to isolated Ag(I) species bonded to alumina, which is consistent with the XANES results.
image file: d2cy01950g-f5.tif
Fig. 5 In situ Ag K-edge EXAFS (a and b) and XANES (c and d) profiles of (a and c) Ag3/CTB and (b and d) Ag3/VGL during re-oxidation by NO + O2 for 300 s (black spectra) at 500 °C after H2 treatment at 800 °C (red spectra). Time-dependence LCF fraction of Ag metal NPs and isolated Ag+ in (e) Ag3/CTB and (f) Ag3/VGL. Flow rate = 1000 mL min−1; sample weight = 136.8 mg.
Table 2 Ag K-edge EXAFS curve-fitting analysis of Ag3/Al2O3
Sample Shell CNa R σ 2 2 R f /%
a Coordination number. b Bond distance. c Debye–Waller factor. d Residual factor.
Sintered Ag3/CTB Ag–Ag 8.9 2.89 0.0237 2.9
Re-oxidized Ag3/CTB Ag–O 1.1 2.25 0.0682 2.1
Ag–Ag 1.6 2.71 0.0208 2.4
Sintered Ag3/VGL Ag–Ag 8.3 2.76 0.0247 2.9
Re-oxidized Ag3/VGL Ag–O 1.1 2.22 0.0060 2.1
Ag–Ag 4.6 2.74 0.0382 2.4


Similar experiments for the redispersion process were performed using in situ diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectroscopy.19,44 The UV-vis spectra of the four different Ag/Al2O3 samples pre-reduced at 800 °C showed a broad band around 400–800 nm, assignable to the small Ag metal NPs (black lines in Fig. 6). The intensity of the band at 750 nm was monitored as a function of time under NO + O2 at 400 °C (Fig. 7a). Oxidation by NO + O2 for 0.5 h decreased the intensity of the band at 400–800 nm due to the Ag metal NPs (blue lines in Fig. 6). Fig. 8a presents a plot of the decrease in the intensity of the UV-vis band at 750 nm (relative amount of redispersed Ag NPs) versus the intensity of the negative peak in the IR profile arising from the HO-μ1-AlVI sites. Conversion of the Ag metal NPs to Ag(I) species increased with increasing number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites on alumina, indicating that the HO-μ1-AlVI sites act as anchoring sites for the dispersed Ag(I) species.


image file: d2cy01950g-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (a) In situ UV spectra of (a) Ag3/CTB, (b) Ag3/PUR, (c) Ag3/VGL, and (d) Ag3/CFF after sintering treatment (black), followed by NO + O2 treatment at 400 °C for 0.5 h (blue).

image file: d2cy01950g-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (a) Time-dependence of relative amount of Ag NPs (UV-vis intensity (KM) at 750 nm) on Ag3/Al2O3 samples under NO + O2 at 400 °C and (b) redispersion rate of Ag NPs, estimated by numerical differentiation (ΔKM/Δt) of the kinetic curves vs. time.

image file: d2cy01950g-f8.tif
Fig. 8 (a) The relative amount of redispersed Ag NPs (ΔKM value in Fig. 6) and (b) the initial rates of Ag NPs re-dispersion (the maximum ΔKM/Δt value in Fig. 7b), versus IR intensity of negative peak due to HO-μ1-AlVI sites (Fig. 3a) for Ag3/Al2O3 samples.

The kinetic curves in Fig. 7a were numerically differentiated to obtain the plots of the initial slope of the kinetic curve (ΔKM/Δt) versus time (Fig. 7b). The maximum values of ΔKM/Δt in the initial period correspond to the initial rates for redispersion of the Ag metal NPs into Ag(I) species. The rates depend on the type of alumina support and changed in the order CTB > PUR > VGL > CFF. This order is consistent with the order of the catalytic activity (Table 1) and sintering resistance of Ag supported on alumina (Fig. 1). Fig. 8a presents the plot of the initial rates for the redispersion of Ag metal NPs (Fig. 7b) as a function of the intensity of the negative band of HO-μ1-AlVI. The rate of redispersion of the Ag metal NPs increased with an increase in the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites, which shows that alumina with a larger number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites leads to more rapid redispersion under oxidative conditions.

In the H2-NH3-SCR and H2-C3H6-SCR employing the Ag/Al2O3 catalysts, reductive aggregation (Ag+ → Ag metal) by H2 and oxidative dispersion (Ag metal → Ag+) by NO + O2 may compete with each other; hence, the relative amount of Ag metal and Ag(I) species depends on the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites on the different alumina types. To quantitatively discuss the effect of the number of anchoring sites on the SCR activity of the Ag/Al2O3 catalysts, the NO conversion (Table 1) in the H2-NH3-SCR at 150 °C and H2-C3H6-SCR at 400 °C was plotted versus the IR intensity of the negative peak due to the HO-μ1-AlVI sites (Fig. 9). For both reactions, the NO conversion increased with increasing number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites, which clearly indicates that Al2O3 with a larger number of surface HO-μ1-AlVI sites is preferable as a support material for the H2-assisted SCR promoted by Ag/Al2O3 catalysts. A larger number of anchoring sites should lead to a higher fraction of highly dispersed Ag(I) species as active species for the SCR, rather than Ag metal NPs, resulting in higher NO conversion.


image file: d2cy01950g-f9.tif
Fig. 9 NO conversion (from Table 1) for H2-NH3-SCR at 150 °C and H2-C3H6-SCR at 400 °C versus IR intensity of negative peak due to HO-μ1-AlVI sites (Fig. 3a) for Ag3/Al2O3 samples. Flow rate = 100 mL min−1; sample weight = 15 mg.

Redispersion mechanism

To discuss the role of NO and O2 during redispersion of the Ag metal NPs, we carried out in situ diffuse reflectance UV-vis experiments of Ag3/CTB pre-reduced by H2 at 800 °C. The intensity of the UV-vis band at 750 nm, assignable to Ag metal NPs, was monitored as a function of oxidation time under NO, O2, or NO + O2 atmosphere at 500 °C (Fig. 10). As the sample was exposed to O2, or NO + O2 atmosphere at 500 °C, the peak intensity for Ag NPs decreased with time, while the intensity did not decrease under NO. The redispersion rate of Ag NPs, estimated from the slope of the kinetic curves, changes in the order NO + O2 > O2 ≫ NO. The result indicates that the redispersion of Ag metal NPs occurs in O2 and NO + O2 at 500 °C, and the redispersion in O2 is promoted by NO.
image file: d2cy01950g-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Time dependence of the UV-vis signal intensity due to Ag NPs during reoxidation by (black) 500 ppm NO, (blue) 10% O2, and (green) 500 ppm NO + 10% O2 at 500 °C. The Ag3/CTB sample was pre-reduced in 2% H2 at 800 °C.

As proposed in our previous work,42 the redispersion mechanism under NO + O2 is described by the following reactions, where AgNO3 species acts as mobile Ag species.

 
Ag0 + NO + 1/2O2 → AgNO3(1)
 
AgNO3 + Al–OH → Al–OAg + HNO3(2)
 
HNO3 + Al–O → NO3Al–OH(3)
The redispersion mechanism under O2 is described by the following reaction.
 
Ag0 + 1/4O2 + Al–OH → Al–OAg + 1/2H2O(4)
Under O2 at 500 °C, metallic Ag0 species at the interface between Ag metal NPs and alumina may be oxidized by O2 to yield Ag+ ions exchanged by Al–OH groups (Al–OAg). The surface Ag+ is exchangeble to H+ of adjacent Al–OH groups and moves across the alumina surface owing to the concentration gradient of the Ag+ cations. The higher dispersion rate under NO + O2 than under O2 can be due to the higher Ag0 oxidation rates or higher migration rates of mobile Ag(I) species under NO + O2.

Redispersion of Ag NPs during H2-C3H6-SCR reaction

The oxidative conversion of inactive Ag NPs into Ag+ species as catalytically active species may result in in situ regeneration of the sintered catalysts during SCR reaction, shown in Fig. 11. To verify this hypothesis, we carried out the H2-C3H6-SCR reaction by the Ag1/CTB catalyst pre-reduced by H2 at 800 °C. The STEM image of the sintered catalyst shows large Ag NPs. The initial NO conversion of the sintered catalyst (6%) was lower than that of the fresh Ag1/CTB (17%). The NOx conversion of the sintered Ag1/CTB gradually increased with time of the H2-C3H6-SCR reaction and reached the value of the fresh Ag1/CTB (dashed red line). The result demonstrates that the oxidative redispersion of aggregated Ag NPs and resulting regeneration of the catalytic activity are possible under catalytic conditions.
image file: d2cy01950g-f11.tif
Fig. 11 Time course of NOx conversion for H2-C3H6-SCR by the sintered Ag1/CTB catalyst (pre-reduced by H2 at 800 °C); the dashed red line corresponds to the NOx conversion of the fresh Ag1/CTB catalyst. Insets: STEM images of the sintered Ag1/CTB before and after the H2-C3H6-SCR reaction.

4. Conclusions

Ag/Al2O3 catalysts were prepared using four types of commercial alumina sources. The effect of the relative amount of on-top OH groups on octahedral Al (HO-μ1-AlVI) on (1) the amount of unsaturated AlIV3+ sites, (2) the sintering resistance of Ag/Al2O3, (3) the rate of Ag redispersion, and (4) the catalytic activity of Ag/Al2O3 was investigated. The number of strong Lewis acid (unsaturated AlIV3+) sites on the Ag-free γ-Al2O3 supports increased with an increase in the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites. Combined with the results in our previous report,42 the data demonstrate that the HO-μ1-AlVI site on the (100) surface adjacent to the unsaturated AlIV3+ site on the (110) surface at the (100)–(110) step edge is a general model for the anchoring sites of Ag on γ-Al2O3. The anchored Ag species, AgO-μ1-AlVI, underwent sintering to yield Ag metal NPs after H2 reduction at 800 °C. The mean size of the Ag metal NPs after sintering decreased with an increase in the number of anchoring sites on the alumina surface. Under NO + O2, the sintered Ag/Al2O3 catalysts undergo oxidative redispersion to regenerate the AgO-μ1-AlVI sites. The amount of redispersed Ag metal and the initial rate of the redispersion process increase with the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites, which demonstrates that the anchored Ag species are in the form of AgO-μ1-AlVI. These results show that the HO-μ1-AlVI site adjacent to the unsaturated AlIV3+ site on γ-Al2O3 (anchoring site of Ag) plays an important role in the sintering resistance and redispersion of the supported Ag species. The activity of these catalysts for H2-assisted SCR of NO by NH3 or C3H6 increased with an increase in the number of HO-μ1-AlVI sites. In summary, the present results provide a simple concept for designing sintering-resistant Ag/Al2O3 catalysts for SCR; γ-Al2O3 with a larger amount of surface HO-μ1-AlVI sites is a preferable support for H2-assisted SCR by Ag/Al2O3 catalysts because the support with a larger number of anchoring sites provides a larger number of AgO-μ1-AlVI sites as active sites for H2-assisted SCR, possibly via dynamic sintering/redispersion cycles.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the JST-CREST project JPMJCR17J3, KAKENHI (Grant No. 20H02518, 20H02775, 20KK0111, 21H04626 and 22K14538), the Joint Usage/Research Center for Catalysis, and the MEXT project IRCCS. H. K. acknowledges the JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (Grant No. 21J11913). XAS measurements were performed at the SPring-8 BL-14B2 beamline at JASRI (proposal No. 2021A1615).

References

  1. K. Shimizu, J. Shibata, H. Yoshida, A. Satsuma and T. Hattori, Silver-Alumina Catalysts for Selective Reduction of NO by Higher Hydrocarbons: Structure of Active Sites and Reaction Mechanism, Appl. Catal., B, 2001, 30, 151–162 CrossRef CAS.
  2. H. Deng, Y. Yu, F. Liu, J. Ma, Y. Zhang and H. He, Nature of Ag Species on Ag/γ-Al2O3: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 2776–2784 CrossRef CAS.
  3. H. Deng, Y. Yu and H. He, Discerning the Role of Ag-O-Al Entities on Ag/γ-Al2O3 Surface in NOx Selective Reduction by Ethanol, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 3132–3142 CrossRef CAS.
  4. J. P. Breen, R. Burch, C. Hardacre, C. J. Hill, B. Krutzsch, B. Bandl-Konrad, E. Jobson, L. Cider, P. G. Blakeman, L. J. Peace, M. V. Twigg, M. Preis and M. Gottschling, An Investigation of the Thermal Stability and Sulphur Tolerance of Ag/γ-Al2O3 Catalysts for the SCR of NOx with Hydrocarbons and Hydrogen, Appl. Catal., B, 2007, 70, 36–44 CrossRef CAS.
  5. K. Hayashizaki, T. Jibiki, K. Inoue, Y. Koyanagi, S. Tanaka, H. Tongu, H. Hirabayashi and S. Sato, After-Treatment System of Medium Duty Engines Using Diesel Fuel as a Reducing Agent for NOx Reduction, SAE [Tech. Pap.], 2018, 1, 0345 Search PubMed.
  6. J. Shibata, K. Shimizu, S. Satokawa, A. Satsuma and T. Hattori, Promotion Effect of Hydrogen on Surface Steps in SCR of NO by Propane over Alumina-Based Silver Catalyst as Examined by Transient FT-IR, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 2154–2160 RSC.
  7. K. Shimizu, M. Katagiri, S. Satokawa and A. Satsuma, Applied Catalysis B : Environmental Sintering-Resistant and Self-Regenerative Properties of Ag/SnO2 Catalyst for Soot Oxidation, Appl. Catal., B, 2011, 108–109, 39–46 CrossRef CAS.
  8. H. Kannisto, M. Skoglundh, K. Arve, E. Olsson and H. Härelind, Direct Observation of Atomically-Resolved Silver Species on a Silver Alumina Catalyst Active for Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2019, 9, 6213–6216 RSC.
  9. S. Tamm, N. Vallim, M. Skoglundh and L. Olsson, The Influence of Hydrogen on the Stability of Nitrates during H2-Assisted SCR over Ag/Al2O3 Catalysts - A DRIFT Study, J. Catal., 2013, 307, 153–161 CrossRef CAS.
  10. S. T. Korhonen, A. M. Beale, M. A. Newton and B. M. Weckhuysen, New Insights into the Active Surface Species of Silver Alumina Catalysts in the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 885–896 CrossRef CAS.
  11. N. Bogdanchikova, F. C. Meunier, M. Avalos-Borja, J. P. Breen and A. Pestryakov, On the Nature of the Silver Phases of Ag/Al2O3 Catalysts for Reactions Involving Nitric Oxide, Appl. Catal., B, 2002, 36, 287–297 CrossRef CAS.
  12. P. Soon, M. Kyu, B. K. Cho, I. Nam and S. H. Oh, Effect of H2 on DeNOx Performance of HC-SCR over Ag/Al2O3: Morphological, Chemical, and Kinetic Changes, J. Catal., 2013, 301, 65–76 CrossRef.
  13. F. Wang, J. Ma, S. Xin, Q. Wang, J. Xu, C. Zhang, H. He and X. Cheng Zeng, Resolving the Puzzle of Single-Atom Silver Dispersion on Nanosized γ-Al2O3 Surface for High Catalytic Performance, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 1–11 CrossRef PubMed.
  14. M. Richter, R. Fricke and R. Eckelt, Unusual Activity Enhancement of NO Conversion over Ag/Al2O3 by Using a Mixed NH3/H2 Reductant under Lean Conditions, Catal. Lett., 2004, 94, 115–118 CrossRef CAS.
  15. E. V. Kondratenko, V. A. Kondratenko, M. Richter and R. Fricke, Influence of O2 and H2 on NO Reduction by NH3 over Ag/Al2O3: A Transient Isotopic Approach, J. Catal., 2006, 239, 23–33 CrossRef CAS.
  16. V. A. Kondratenko, U. Bentrup, M. Richter, T. W. Hansen and E. V. Kondratenko, Mechanistic Aspects of N2O and N2 Formation in NO Reduction by NH3 over Ag/Al2O3: The Effect of O2 and H2, Appl. Catal., B, 2008, 84, 497–504 CrossRef CAS.
  17. G. Xu, H. Wang, Y. Yu and H. He, Role of Silver Species in H2-NH3-SCR of NOx over Ag/Al2O3 Catalysts: Operando Spectroscopy and DFT Calculations, J. Catal., 2021, 395, 1–9 CrossRef CAS.
  18. K. Shimizu and A. Satsuma, Hydrogen Assisted Urea-SCR and NH3-SCR with Silver-Alumina as Highly Active and SO2-Tolerant de-NOx Catalysis, Appl. Catal., B, 2007, 77, 202–205 CrossRef CAS.
  19. K. Shimizu and A. Satsuma, Reaction Mechanism of H2-Promoted Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 over Ag/Al2O3, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 2259–2264 CrossRef CAS.
  20. G. Xu, J. Ma, L. Wang, Z. Lv, S. Wang and Y. Yu, Mechanism of the H2 Effect on NH3-Selective Catalytic Reduction over Ag/Al2O3 : Kinetic and Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy Studies, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 10489–10498 CrossRef CAS.
  21. Q. Wan, S. Hu, J. Dai, C. Chen and W. X. Li, First-Principles Kinetic Study for Ostwald Ripening of Late Transition Metals on TiO2 (110), J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019, 123, 1160–1169 CrossRef CAS.
  22. C. K. Narula and G. M. Stocks, Ab Initio Density Functional Calculations of Adsorption of Transition Metal Atoms on θ-Al2O3(010) Surface, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 5628–5636 CrossRef CAS.
  23. E. M. Dietze and P. N. Plessow, Predicting the Strength of Metal − Support Interaction with Computational Descriptors for Adhesion Energies, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019, 123, 20443–20450 CrossRef CAS.
  24. G. Agostini, S. Usseglio, E. Groppo, M. J. Uddin, C. Prestipino, S. Bordiga, A. Zecchina, P. L. Solari and C. Lamberti, From Isolated Ag+ Ions to Aggregated Ag0 Nanoclusters in Silver-Exchanged Engelhard Titanosilicate (ETS-10) Molecular Sieve: Reversible Behavior, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 1343–1353 CrossRef CAS.
  25. K. Shimizu, K. Sawabe and A. Satsuma, Self-Regenerative Silver Nanocluster Catalyst for CO Oxidation, ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1290–1293 CrossRef CAS.
  26. G. Busca, Structural, Surface, and Catalytic Properties of Aluminas, Adv. Catal., 2014, 57, 319–404 CAS.
  27. F. Rascón, R. Wischert and C. Copéret, Molecular Nature of Support Effects in Single-Site Heterogeneous Catalysts: Silica vs. Alumina, Chem. Sci., 2011, 2, 1449–1456 RSC.
  28. E. J. Jang, J. Lee and J. H. Kwak, Morphology Change and Phase Transformation of Alumina Related to Defect Sites and Its Use in Catalyst Preparation, Catal. Today, 2020, 352, 323–328 CrossRef CAS.
  29. J. H. Kwak, J. Z. Hu, D. H. Kim, J. Szanyi and C. H. F. Peden, penta-Coordinated Al3+ Ions as Preferential Nucleation Sites for BaO on γ-Al2O3: An Ultra-High-Magnetic Field 27Al MAS NMR Study, J. Catal., 2007, 251, 189–194 CrossRef CAS.
  30. J. H. Kwak, J. Hu, A. Lukaski, D. H. Kim, J. Szanyi and C. H. F. Peden, Role of pentacoordinated Al3+ Ions in the High Temperature Phase Transformation of γ-Al2O3, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 9486–9492 CrossRef CAS.
  31. T. K. Phung, A. Lagazzo, M. Á. Rivero Crespo, V. Sánchez Escribano and G. Busca, A Study of Commercial Transition Aluminas and of Their Catalytic Activity in the Dehydration of Ethanol, J. Catal., 2014, 311, 102–113 CrossRef CAS.
  32. K. Murata, T. Shiotani, J. Ohyama, R. Wakabayashi, H. Maruoka, T. Kimura and A. Satsuma, Relationship between penta-Coordinated Al3+ Sites in the Al2O3 Supports and CH4 Combustion Activity of Pd/Al2O3 Catalysts, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2021, 11, 2374–2378 RSC.
  33. X. Liu, DRIFTS Study of Surface of γ-Alumina and Its Dehydroxylation, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 5066–5073 CrossRef CAS.
  34. S. Srinivasan, C. R. Narayanan and A. K. Datye, The Role of Sodium and Structure on the Catalytic Behavior of Alumina: II. IR Spectroscopy, Appl. Catal., A, 1995, 132, 289–308 CrossRef CAS.
  35. D. T. Lundie, A. R. McInroy, R. Marshall, J. M. Winfield, P. Jones, C. C. Dudman, S. F. Parker, C. Mitchell and D. Lennon, Improved Description of the Surface Acidity of η-Alumina, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 11592–11601 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. T. K. Phung, C. Herrera, M. Á. Larrubia, M. García-Diéguez, E. Finocchio, L. J. Alemany and G. Busca, Surface and Catalytic Properties of Some γ-Al2O3 Powders, Appl. Catal., A, 2014, 483, 41–51 CrossRef CAS.
  37. X. Liu and R. E. Truitt, DRFT-IR Studies of the Surface of γ-Alumina, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 9856–9860 CrossRef CAS.
  38. C. Morterra and G. Magnacca, A Case Study: Surface Chemistry and Surface Structure of Catalytic Aluminas, as Studied by Vibrational Spectroscopy of Adsorbed Species, Catal. Today, 1996, 27, 497–532 CrossRef CAS.
  39. M. Digne, P. Sautet, P. Raybaud, P. Euzen and H. Toulhoat, Use of DFT to Achieve a Rational Understanding of Acid-Basic Properties of γ-Alumina Surfaces, J. Catal., 2004, 226, 54–68 CrossRef CAS.
  40. J. Lee, E. J. Jang, H. Y. Jeong and J. H. Kwak, Critical Role of (100) Facets on Γ-Al2O3 for Ethanol Dehydration: Combined Efforts of Morphology-Controlled Synthesis and TEM Study, Appl. Catal., A, 2018, 556, 121–128 CrossRef CAS.
  41. A. Dyan, P. Cenedese and P. Dubot, Physical Properties of γ Alumina Surface Hydroxyls Revisited through a Large Scale Periodic Quantum-Chemistry Approach, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 10041–10050 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. H. Kubota, S. Mine, T. Toyao, Z. Maeno and K. I. Shimizu, Redox-Driven Reversible Structural Evolution of Isolated Silver Atoms Anchored to Specific Sites on γ-Al2O3, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 544–559 CrossRef CAS.
  43. B. Ravel and M. Newville, ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: Data Analysis for X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Using IFEFFIT, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 2005, 12, 537–541 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. B. Inceesungvorn, J. López-Castro, J. J. Calvino, S. Bernal, F. C. Meunier, C. Hardacre, K. Griffin and J. J. Delgado, Nano-Structural Investigation of Ag/Al2O3 Catalyst for Selective Removal of O2 with Excess H2 in the Presence of C2H4, Appl. Catal., A, 2011, 391, 187–193 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cy01950g

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.