Humberto
da Silva
Jr
a,
Qian
Yao
b,
Masato
Morita
c,
Brian K.
Kendrick
d,
Hua
Guo
*b and
Naduvalath
Balakrishnan
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA. E-mail: naduvala@unlv.nevada.edu
bDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA. E-mail: hguo@unm.edu
cChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry and Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada
dTheoretical Division (T-1, MS B221), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
First published on 10th July 2023
Correction for ‘The Li + CaF → Ca + LiF chemical reaction under cold conditions’ by Humberto da Silva Jr et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2023, 25, 14193–14205, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP01464A.
1. The sentence above eqn (4) should be rephrased as “The long-range part of the interaction potential between an atom and a diatomic molecule, VLR, in each arrangement is fitted with the following expression:”
2. Eqn (4) should read as
3. Eqn (5) should read as
Vabc = sabcVs,abc + (1 − sabc)Vl,abc |
4. The sentence below eqn (5) should read as: “where Vs,abc is the short-range part of the total potential given in the form of eqn (1), Vl,abc is the long-range part of the total potential satisfying Vl,abc = VLR + V(2)ab in the ab + c arrangement channel, and the arrangement-dependent switching function, sabc, is defined as”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2023 |