Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Metal-insulator transition and resistive switching in Y-doped CeO2 ceramics

Fawaz Almutairi ab, Meshari Alotaibi c and Anthony R. West b
aDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
bUniversity of Sheffield, Dept of Materials Science & Engineering, Mappin St, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
cDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia

Received 26th July 2023 , Accepted 26th November 2023

First published on 27th November 2023


Abstract

Y-doped ceria, Y0.16Ce0.84O1.92, is an oxide ion conductor that shows n-type conductivity under a small applied voltage. With increasing voltage, resistive switching by 2–3 orders of magnitude occurs that is reversible with some hysteresis and is enhanced in atmospheres of reduced pO2. The switching is a bulk effect, is not associated with Schottky barriers or with a crystallographic transition, occurs rapidly after a premonitory onset period depending on conditions and shows characteristics of a Mott transition. This is the third known example of low field-induced resistive switching in a bulk ceramic and represents an emergent phenomenon in materials that are taken outside their zone of thermodynamic stability.


Introduction

Resistive switching phenomena in bulk materials are usually associated with phase transitions and are often described as metal-insulator transitions.1 A new type of resistive switching (RS) in bulk materials has been reported in two recent examples, Ca-doped BiFeO3 (BCF)2 and Y-doped HfO2, yttria-stabilised hafnia (YSH),3 in which switching occurs in response to the application of a small voltage but does not involve any phase transition. It appears to be a different phenomenon to the voltage-induced switching observed in widely-studied memristive effects that is limited to thin films of nanometre dimensions and is associated with the formation and rupture of conducting filaments.4–12

Both BCF and YSH show different levels of mixed oxide-ion and p-type conductivity associated with the presence of oxygen vacancies. The oxygen vacancies charge-compensate the acceptor (lower valence) dopants, i.e. Ca2+ in place of Bi3+ and Y3+ in place of Hf4+. The p-type conductivity in YSH is attributed to hole creation:

 
image file: d3cp03562j-t1.tif(1)

The holes appear to be located on lattice oxide ions, image file: d3cp03562j-t2.tif whose number increases by a redox process involving reaction of lattice oxygen, image file: d3cp03562j-t3.tif with oxygen vacancies, image file: d3cp03562j-t4.tif and atmospheric oxygen, O2:

 
image file: d3cp03562j-t5.tif(2)

The p-type conductivity can also be introduced, or increased, on application of a small dc bias in the range 0.5–40 V, depending on the material and temperature.3,13,14 With increasing bias, both BCF and YSH showed a gradual increase in p-type conductivity that concluded with a rapid switch, by 2–3 orders of magnitude, to a high conductivity ‘ON’ state. On removing the bias, the conductivity switched back to the original ‘OFF’ state with some hysteresis.3,13 With increasing bias and before the OFF–ON switching occurred, the electronic conduction mechanism in YSH became n-type which led to the suggestion that a pn transition may be involved as well as oxygen exchange between samples and atmosphere.3 Undoped BiFeO3 does not show the same RS behaviour and in general, other stoichiometric materials, such as BaTiO3, are not sensitive to a small dc bias. When they are acceptor-doped, however, their electronic conductivity becomes p-type and dependent on voltage and pO2.13–16

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether low field-induced RS occurs in materials that are mixed conductors but n-type, rather than p-type in their electronic component, to gain further understanding of the RS process and the range of material types that may show this effect. This type of RS is an emergent phenomenon in which materials are taken outside their zone of thermodynamic stability but retain sufficient kinetic stability that they do not decompose with applied voltages that are above their decomposition potential.27

Pure and doped ceria (CeO2) materials are well-known mixed oxide ion and n-type conductors.17,18 They have higher ionic conductivity than YSZ at intermediate temperatures (400–700 °C), good thermodynamic stability19 and have been studied intensively due to application possibilities as electrodes and electrolytes in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) and catalysts.20–23 CeO2 has the cubic fluorite structure, its defect structure has been well-studied,24 it is stable over the whole temperature range up to its melting point17 and is very tolerant to doping by lower valence elements such as Y and rare earths, generating oxygen vacancies by mechanisms such as:

 
image file: d3cp03562j-t6.tif(3)

Their mixed conductivity is due to reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ at high temperature (>800 °C) and/or in reducing atmospheres18,23 in which lattice oxide ions are released according to:

 
image file: d3cp03562j-t7.tif(4)

It was anticipated that electronic conductivity may also be induced in yttria-doped ceria at low temperatures by application of a small dc bias giving either single or double ionisation of oxide ions and either hole or electron conductivity, eqn (2) and (4), respectively, similar to that observed in the oxide ion conductors YSZ and YSH.25,26

Experimental

Samples of yttria-doped ceria (YDC), Ce0.84Y0.16O1.92 were prepared by solid state reaction of CeO2 (99% Sigma-Aldrich) and Y2O3 (99.99% Alfa Aesar) at 1400 °C for 12 h. Reagents were dried overnight at 900 °C before weighing, manually mixed in a conventional mortar and pestle with acetone, dried and reacted in an alumina crucible. The reacted powders were re-ground and pressed into pellets, 10 mm diameter and thickness of 1.5–3 mm, using a uniaxial press and sintered at around 1500 °C.

The sintered pellets were crushed and analysed using X-ray powder diffraction for phase identification a using Bruker D2 phaser with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The data were collected over the range 20° < 2θ < 90°.

Ceramic electrical properties were measured and analysed using impedance spectroscopy. For impedance measurements, Au paste was attached to opposite sides of sintered pellets and dried at 850 °C for 2 hours. A pellet with attached electrodes was placed between Pt leads in an in-house measuring jig and placed in a tube furnace. Impedance measurements were performed as a function of different variables: (i) temperature, (ii) oxygen partial pressure, pO2, (iii) dc bias and (iv) combination of dc bias and pO2. Three impedance analysers were used which were Modulab XM Solartron with a frequency range 0.1 Hz-1000 kHz, Solartron SI 1260 with a frequency range 0.1 Hz-1000 kHz and Agilent 4294A with a frequency range 0.04–1000 kHz.

The collected data were corrected for jig impedance characteristics in which closed circuit measurements were performed to eliminate the lead inductance and resistance; open circuit measurements were performed to eliminate the blank capacitance of the jig. The data were corrected for the overall sample geometry in which the specific values of sample resistance, R and capacitance, C, i.e. resistivity, ρ and permittivity, ε are given by eqn (5) and (6), respectively:

 
ρ = RA/d(5)
 
ε = Cd/A(6)
where A is the cross section area of the pellet and d its thickness. Therefore, resistivity and permittivity are quoted in units of Ω cm and F cm−1, respectively.

Results

Fig. 1 shows the XRD pattern of Ce0.84Y0.16O1.92 which confirms that the sample was single phase. Data were indexed on a cubic unit cell, consistent with the data reported in the literature.19,22
image file: d3cp03562j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 XRD pattern of Ce0.84Y0.16O2.92 showing a single phase, cubic fluorite structure.

A selection of impedance data, Fig. 2, over the range 245–506 °C show the presence of three components which were attributed, from their capacitance values of approximately 15 pF cm−1, 3 nF cm−1 and 400 μF cm−1, to sample bulk, grain boundary and sample-electrode interfaces, respectively. The low frequency impedance response is typical of oxide ion conduction that is in series with an element containing a double layer capacitance, Cdl in parallel with a charge transfer resistance, RCT, inset (a).


image file: d3cp03562j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Impedance complex plane plots, Z* at (a) 245, 300 °C and (b) 340, 379 and 506 °C. The ideal equivalent circuit to represent the impedance data is shown as inset (a); for accurate data fitting, constant phase elements would be added to the ideal circuit. (c) C′ spectroscopic plots at different temperatures; (d) Z′′/M′′ spectroscopic plots.

Arrhenius plots of bulk, grain boundary and total conductivities are shown in Fig. 3. Activation energies in the range 0.83–0.94 eV are consistent with literature data on oxide ion conductivity of doped ceria. The grain boundary activation energy, 0.94(2) eV, is slightly higher than the bulk value, 0.83(1) eV which may reflect a difference in either local structure or composition of the grain boundary.


image file: d3cp03562j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Arrhenius plot of bulk, grain boundary and total conductivity of Ce0.84Y0.16O2.92.

The effect of pO2 on impedance data at 417 and 506 °C, Fig. 4, shows that the sample conductivity was independent of pO2 and the sample was in the electrolytic domain of oxide-ion conductivity at these temperatures, consistent with that reported in.19 Only the sample-electrode interface resistance was sensitive to pO2, as shown by a dramatic decrease in conductivity Y′ at low frequency in N2, Fig. 4(b) and (d). This showed that the O2/O2− charge transfer resistance increased greatly at low pO2 and was further evidence that the sample was an oxide ion conductor.


image file: d3cp03562j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) and (c) impedance complex plane plots, (b) and (d) Y′ spectroscopic plots of Ce0.84Y0.16O2.92 measured in O2 and N2 at different temperatures.

The effect of dc bias on the impedance response in different atmospheres at 353 °C is shown in Fig. 5. All three resistances, bulk, grain boundary and total, decrease with increasing voltage and the decreases are greater in N2 than in O2. These results indicate that electronic conductivity is induced by application of a small dc bias, similar to that observed in YSZ08.25,27 The resulting conductivity is n-type because O2 loss under bias at low pO2, eqn (4) is accompanied by electron injection into the sample and presumably leads to the creation of Ce3+ ions which are the main electron carrier.


image file: d3cp03562j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Impedance complex plane plots of Ce0.84Y0.16O2.92 measured in different atmospheres at 353 °C on application of (a) 2 V, (b) 4 V, (c) 6 V and (d) 10 V.

With increasing voltage at 366 °C in N2, the total conductivity increased slightly until, at 105 V cm−1, a sudden switch to a higher conductivity ON state occurred, Fig. 6. The conductivity increased abruptly by about two orders of magnitude (a); on decreasing the field, the ON state conductivity increased a little until, below 55 V cm−1, it decreased abruptly to its original value. The measurements were done on three different samples with different dimensions and repeated up to 8 cycles to check data reproducibility. The data reported in Fig. 6a show that the ON–OFF switching behaviour was reproducible with no obvious change in the data after 8 cycles. The switching behaviour was independent of polarity of applied voltage (not shown) and the sample switched similarly in both directions.


image file: d3cp03562j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 The total conductivity of Ce0.84Y0.16O2.92 at 366 °C (a) after reaching steady state vs. applied voltage in N2, (b) and (c) against time on applying and removing 119 and 155 V cm−1 in air and N2.

A further indication of the effect of pO2 on this RS behaviour is shown by the time dependence of the total conductivity in response to 119 and 155 V cm−1 at 366 °C in N2 and air (b) and (c). At the lower voltage, 119 V cm−1 (b), the conductivity in air increased slightly but remained in the OFF state for 200 minutes, whereas in N2 the sample showed premonitory increase in conductivity before a rapid switch to the ON state after 125 minutes. However, at the higher voltage, 155 V cm−1 (c), the sample showed similar premonitory increases in conductivity before rapid switching to the ON state in both air and N2. The rapid increase in conductivity occurred earlier in N2 and the ON state conductivity was highest in N2. With both applied biases, on removal of the bias, the sample recovered its original conductivity rapidly after a similar time in both air and N2.

Further investigation of the effect of pO2 on the switching mechanism and conductivity in the ON state is shown in Fig. 7. The samples had been switched to the ON state at 620 °C by application of 20 V in atmospheres of either N2 and O2 and the conductivities shown were measured, with the voltage applied, on cooling in the same atmosphere; data recorded with 0 V are shown for comparison. In N2, the sample maintained the ON state on cooling to 100 °C with a gradual decrease in both conductivity and activation energy, especially at lower temperatures. In O2, the sample maintained the ON state over a more limited temperature range and gradually switched back to the OFF state below 250 °C. During cooling in the two atmospheres, the ON state conductivity was highest in N2.


image file: d3cp03562j-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Arrhenius plots of total conductivity in OFF state in air and on cooling with application of 20 V (158 V cm−1) in N2 and in O2.

The impedance of samples before and after passing through the ON–OFF cycle showed no significant differences, Fig. 8, indicating that no obvious irreversible changes, such as degradation under applied voltage, occurred during the switching process.


image file: d3cp03562j-f8.tif
Fig. 8 The impedance response of Ce0.84Y0.16O2.92, before application, during and after removal of 119 V cm−1.

Discussion

CeO2 is a well-known MIT material for thin film devices which shows both bipolar and unipolar switching.28–32 For example, a device made of 50 nm layer of CeO2 with sequence of Ag–Ti–CeO2–Pt showed stable repeatable bipolar and unipolar RS.32 In both switching types, the device maintained the new resistance state until rest voltage was applied (i.e. the device has two stable states, ON and OFF state, in the absence of electrical field). In bipolar switching, the device switched to low resistance state at about +0.3 V and recovered its original state at about − 0.5 V. In many studies28–32 such devices showed good endurance and retention in which the device can maintain the ON and OFF state up to 105 s.

The RS in yttria-doped ceria, YDC is clearly electronic in origin but also different from the unipolar and bipolar switching of thin film memristors that require re-application of a bias voltage to recover the original conductivity4 while in the absence of the electrical field, YDC has only one stable state, OFF state (Fig. 6). It occurs over an entirely different length scale, 1 to 10 mm, to that involved in switching thin film memristors, 1 to 10 nm. The applied voltages used with memristors, typically 1–2 V, are at the lower end of those used with bulk ceramics, 1–40 V, but the average field gradients must differ by six orders of magnitude. A direct comparison of the fields used in the two sets of materials is difficult, however, because in the bulk ceramics, the field may be localised initially at resistive ceramic-electrode interfaces. It is difficult to compare these results with RS in a thin film device due to these differences and especially, since our work is on millimetre thick samples. Therefore, further work is required to check our results on nanoscale materials for possible device applications and to establish whether the RS in bulk ceramics and thin film memristors have a common origin. Our results are comparable to recently-reported RS in two types of bulk materials: perovskite-structured Ca-doped BF (BCF) and fluorite-structured YSH.

YDC is the third example, after Ca-doped BF and YSH, to show this kind of resistive switching in bulk ceramics. In response to application and removal of a small dc bias, all three cases show a premonitory period of increased conductivity followed by a rapid, reversible increase, with hysteresis, in the conductivity by a few orders of magnitude. There is a threshold set of conditions involving three inter-dependent parameters: voltage, temperature and atmosphere, for RS to occur.

There is no evidence of any crystallographic phase transition and the switching is reversible, with hysteresis, without showing sample degradation. Thus, we have no direct evidence of crystallographic changes to form the ON state or whether, as proposed, Ce4+ ions are reduced to Ce3+. However, since the ON state has almost zero activation energy for conduction, it is likely that a band model for conductivity is required, in which case, it may no longer appropriate to refer to the ionic 3+ and 4+ states of Ce.

RS occurs in both bulk and grain boundary components and is not associated with any Schottky barrier at the sample-electrode interfaces. All three materials are acceptor-doped and show different levels of mixed oxide-ion and electronic conductivity, depending on conditions. They have oxygen vacancies as the main charge compensation mechanism but differ in the nature of their electronic conductivities which is p-type in BCF, changes from p- to n-type with increasing voltage in YSH, but is n-type in YDC.

The RS mechanism in YSH was attributed to the possible breakdown of a p–i–n junction in which p- and n-type conductivities were created at opposite electrodes in response to application of the dc bias,3 with the implication that one of the electronic components, presumably the n-type, dominated the ON state conductivity. The RS mechanism in BCF may initiate with hole injection at the anode to form a p-type surface layer that thickens and grows into the sample interior2 since it showed no evidence of any n-type conductivity during or after the switching. Evidence for hole injection and growth of a p-type region was obtained in related studies of Mg-doped BaTiO3 in which electric modulus, M′′ presentations of impedance data showed that the initial bulk impedance component was gradually replaced by a more conductive bulk component.13 The total conductivity increased by several orders of magnitude under certain conditions but remained p-type and did not achieve resistive switching.

In contrast to YSH and BCF, YDC showed RS that was n-type in both the low field OFF state and high field ON state. The n-type conductivity is attributed primarily to loss of oxygen, especially in atmospheres of low pO2 and is associated with electron injection at the negative electrode and probable reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ to give an n-type layer that thickens and grows towards the anode. It appears that the RS mechanism in YDC is similar to that in BCF, therefore, but different in carrier type and source of the electronic conductivity.

We conclude that several factors influence RS and that conductivity can be either p-type or n-type in the ON state, depending on the material. The ON state conductivity of YDC, Fig. 7 and BCF has very low activation energy indicating that the carrier concentration becomes constant and a band model for conduction is appropriate. This is in contrast to the OFF state for which the high activation energies indicate a model of carrier localisation and hopping conduction. Depending on experimental conditions, the RS in YDC, as for the other two cases, involves a sharp transition that follows a premonitory region of gradually increasing conductivity. All three cases appear to involve an increase in carrier concentration that may also be described as either a change from small-to-large polaron conduction or a Mott transition1 both of which involve an increase in number, and delocalisation, of the charge carriers. Evidence for this may come from the premonitory period of increasing conductivity prior to switching, in which the conductivities are time-independent once a steady state is reached; the conductivity increase could be attributed to a gradual increase in polaron size and/or delocalisation of the charge carriers.

Oxygen exchange between sample and atmosphere appears to be an important parameter in all three RS cases and leads to major changes in carrier concentration. The time-dependence of switching that is frequently observed may depend on bulk diffusion of oxide ions within the host lattice and therefore, on the presence of oxygen vacancies and oxide ion conductivity although, of course, the RS process itself is electronic in origin.

Conclusions

Single phase Ce0.84Y0.16O1.92 sintered in air is primarily an oxide-ion conductor. n-type electronic conductivity induced by applying a small dc bias is attributed to oxygen loss and liberation of electrons which reduce Ce4+ to Ce3+. At higher bias, reversible resistive switching occurs leading to a high conductivity ON state with delocalised charge carriers. The switching has characteristics of a metal-insulator transition but is not associated with a crystallographic phase transition. YDC is the third example to show low-field resistive switching in a bulk ceramic.

Low field-induced RS is an example of emergent phenomena in which the effect of an applied voltage that is above the theoretical decomposition potential of a material is to create a domain of thermodynamic metastability but kinetic stability. In this domain, the materials retain their essential crystal structure but may undergo voltage-induced reversible changes to bond character, defect structure or sample homogeneity without undergoing complete decomposition. Examples of such emergent phenomena are V-induced RS of bulk ceramics, memristive switching of thin films, flash sintering of ceramics and charging of Li, Na battery cathodes by a mechanism that combines a redox reaction and Li or Na de-intercalation.26

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Fawaz Almutairi thanks Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University for a studentship.

References

  1. N. F. Mott, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1968, 40, 677 CrossRef CAS.
  2. N. Maso, H. Beltran, M. Prades, E. Cordoncillo and A. R. West, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 19408–19416 RSC.
  3. M. Alotaibi, F. Almutairi and A. R. West, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2022, 106, 822–828 CrossRef.
  4. J. S. Lee, S. Lee and T. W. Noh, Appl. Phys. Rev., 2015, 2, 031303 Search PubMed.
  5. D. Kumar, R. Aluguri, U. Chand and T. Y. Tseng, Ceram. Int., 2017, 43, S547–S556 CrossRef CAS.
  6. A. Sawa, Mater. Today, 2008, 11, 28–36 CrossRef CAS.
  7. D. Panda and T.-Y. Tseng, Ferroelectrics, 2014, 471, 23–64 CrossRef CAS.
  8. K. M. Kim, D. S. Jeong and C. S. Hwang, Nanotechnology, 2011, 22, 254002 CrossRef PubMed.
  9. B. J. Choi, S. Choi, K. M. Kim, Y. C. Shin, C. S. Hwang, S.-Y. Hwang, S.-S. Cho, S. Park and S.-K. Hong, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2006, 89, 012906 CrossRef.
  10. C.-Y. Lin, S.-Y. Wang, D.-Y. Lee and T.-Y. Tseng, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2008, 155, H615 CrossRef CAS.
  11. F. Walz, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2002, 14, R285 CrossRef CAS.
  12. J. García and G. Subías, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2004, 16, R145 CrossRef.
  13. M. Prades, N. Masó, H. Beltrán, E. Cordoncillo and A. R. West, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 5335–5344 RSC.
  14. N. Masó and A. R. West, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 2127–2132 CrossRef.
  15. Q.-L. Zhang, N. Masó, Y. Liu, H. Yang and A. R. West, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 12894–12900 RSC.
  16. L. Gil Escrig, M. Prades, H. Beltrán, E. Cordoncillo, N. Masó and A. R. West, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2014, 97, 2815–2824 CrossRef CAS.
  17. M. Mogensen, N. M. Sammes and G. A. Tompsett, Solid State Ionics, 2000, 129, 63–94 CrossRef CAS.
  18. Y. Xiong, K. Yamaji, N. Sakai, H. Kishimoto, T. Horita, M. E. Brito and H. Yokokawa, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2006, 153, A2198 CrossRef CAS.
  19. F. Yang, X. Zhao and P. Xiao, J. Power Sources, 2011, 196, 4943–4949 CrossRef CAS.
  20. G. Varvoutis, M. Lykaki, G. E. Marnellos and M. Konsolakis, Catalysts, 2023, 13, 275 CrossRef CAS.
  21. X. Guo, S. Mi and R. Waser, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2005, 8, J1–J3 CrossRef CAS.
  22. S. Omar, E. D. Wachsman, J. L. Jones and J. C. Nino, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2009, 92, 2674–2681 CrossRef CAS.
  23. X. Guo, W. Sigle and J. Maier, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2003, 86, 77–87 CrossRef CAS.
  24. H. Tuller and A. Nowick, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1979, 126, 209 CrossRef CAS.
  25. N. Masó and A. R. West, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27, 1552–1558 CrossRef.
  26. A. R. West, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11, 12681–12694 RSC.
  27. M. Jovaní, H. Beltrán-Mir, E. Cordoncillo and A. R. West, Sci. Rep., 2019, 9, 18538 CrossRef PubMed.
  28. A. M. Rana, M. Ismail, E. Ahmed, I. Talib, T. Khan, M. Hussain and M. Nadeem, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 2015, 39, 211–216 CrossRef CAS.
  29. C.-Y. Lin, D.-Y. Lee, S.-Y. Wang, C.-C. Lin and T.-Y. Tseng, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, 203, 480–483 CrossRef CAS.
  30. M. Ismail, A. Ahmad, K. Mahmood, T. Akbar, A. M. Rana, J. Lee and S. Kim, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 483, 803–810 CrossRef CAS.
  31. H. Li, T. Liu, Y. Wang, S. Geng, T. Xu, M. Cao, S. Fan, T. Liu and J. Su, Ceram. Int., 2022, 48, 13754–13760 CrossRef CAS.
  32. W. Wang, B. Zhang and H. Zhao, Results Phys., 2020, 16, 103001 CrossRef.

This journal is © the Owner Societies 2023
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.