Olivia
Wilkins
*a,
Divita
Gupta
b and
Mathieu
Bertin
c
aNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt MD 20771, USA. E-mail: olivia.h.wilkins@outlook.com
bI. Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Str. 77, 50937 Köln, Germany
cSorbonne Université, Observatoire de Paris, PSL University, CNRS, LERMA, F-75005, Paris, France
First published on 25th October 2023
The Faraday Discussion ‘Astrochemistry at high resolution’ was held at the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, United States, and online from May 31–June 2, 2023. The meeting brought together observers, modellers, and experimentalists at different career stages and from different countries to discuss advancements in astrochemistry resulting from improved spatial resolution, spectral resolution, and sensitivity. This conference report provides highlights of the meeting and summaries of the talks presented.
In this context, astrochemists from different research areas, countries, and career stages convened at the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI, Fig. 1) in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, between May 31 and June 2, 2023, to participate in the Faraday Discussion on ‘Astrochemistry at high resolution’. After many years of planning, and despite postponements due to JWST launch delays and the COVID-19 pandemic, this celebration of the advances in astrochemistry methods was timed perfectly, beginning six weeks prior to the one-year anniversary of the first JWST image release.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 STScI logo welcoming delegates to the Faraday Discussion on the campus of Johns Hopkins University. |
The Faraday Discussion provided a unique platform to ask very basic questions across different disciplines and, at the same, very advanced questions within one's discipline. In our experience, such exchanges are not common in the general discussion of other scientific meetings, likely because question-and-answer portions of symposia are typically limited to a mere five minutes. The format of the Faraday Discussion in which a set of talks is followed by a discussion time of approximately 25 minutes per speaker, provided ample time for conversations about a variety of topics in astrochemistry engaging the whole delegation in attendance. Furthermore, the discussion facilitated conversations across different communities within astrochemistry—laboratory scientists, modellers, and observers—enhancing the general discussion with broader perspectives. In this way, possibilities for follow-up research and cross-disciplinary investigations came as a natural part of the meeting. In addition, the meeting format allowed space to have discussions about aspects that might not be typically written about in detail in a manuscript (e.g., the details of control experiments or “failed” investigations).
Finally, interactions between established and early-career astrochemists were central to the Faraday Discussion. The meeting hosted delegates spanning all career stages—from students to academics near retirement—and it seemed participants generally treated other delegates as colleagues and equals. It was also noteworthy that, during the general discussions, many conversations were initiated by more junior members of the community. Beyond the papers presented and the discussions that followed, the meeting comprised a lively poster session, conference dinner, and connections over coffee breaks.
This perspective attempts to consolidate the key themes and what we found to be the most interesting aspects of each session of this Faraday Discussion on Astrochemistry at high resolution. The meeting began with the Introductory Lecture and Session 1: (“Observational astrochemistry in the age of ALMA, NOEMA, JWST and beyond!”) on 31 May. The second day of the meeting encompassed laboratory astrochemistry in Sessions 2 (“Laboratory astrochemistry of the gas phase”) and 3 (“Laboratory astrochemistry of and on dust and ices”). The meeting concluded late in the morning of 2 June with Session 4 (“Computational astrochemistry”) and the Concluding remarks.
Ceccarelli also gave meeting delegates a crash course in stellar evolution, focusing on interstellar complex organic molecules, which are typically defined as having six or more atoms. She talked about the surprising presence of gas-phase complex organics in prestellar cores despite having cold temperatures around 10 K, the “fountains of interstellar complex organic molecules” observed in protostars, and the refrigeration of these organics in protoplanetary disks. In particular, Ceccarelli described hot corinos, cores of low-mass protostars, as mines of complex organics.
To understand the chemistry in hot corinos (and, in the context of massive star formation, hot cores), a combination of observations and models is needed. Ceccarelli described the advances and challenges in formulating and employing astrochemical models, especially in the context of coupling the gas and dust grain chemistry. Fortunately, progress in improving the spectral and spatial resolution of astrochemical research methods continues to bring us closer to definitively understanding the complex chemical networks that are found in even the earliest stages of star formation.
In addition to revealing the chemistry of disks, JWST is expected to impact how we understand the chemistry of already-formed planets. Between the two talks introducing early disk science with JWST, Nikku Madhusudhan of Cambridge University (UK) presented theoretical work exploring the chemistry of Hycean worlds, whether chemistry on such exoplanets could be conducive to life, and the potential for JWST to observe this chemistry, especially given the telescope's superior spectral resolution (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00075c). The models presented gave delegates an exciting glimpse into some of the exoplanetary chemistry that might be revealed with future JWST observations, but it was a linguistics lesson that evoked a collective gasp of delight from audience members, whose backgrounds were mostly in interstellar and solar system chemistry. Madhusudhan explained that ‘hycean’ is pronounced HI-shin, not hi-SEE-en as most delegates had apparently believed, because it is a portmanteau of hydrogen—describing these planets' atmospheres—and ocean—referring to the liquid water on their surfaces.
The second half of Session 1 focused on papers using ALMA data to look at chemistry in various celestial environments. While spectral resolution is indeed important for astrochemical observations with ALMA, the high spatial resolution is of particular importance for the ALMA observations presented. Eleonora Bianchi of the Excellence Cluster ORIGINS (Germany) presented observations of chemical differentiation—as seen by high-resolution observations of HDO, SO2, and NH2CHO—in SVS13-A, a protobinary star system about 300 pc away in Perseus (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00018d). Going beyond the local interstellar medium, Olivia Wilkins from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (USA) used the Atacama Compact Array (ACA), a subset of the full ALMA, to conduct a pilot survey of the chemistry in previously unexplored massive star-forming regions in the so-called molecular ring, which spans radii of 4-8 kpc from the galactic center (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00003f). Ko-Yun Huang of Leiden University (The Netherlands) took delegates even farther away from the solar system into two nearby galaxies to explore large-scale shocks as seen via SiO, HNCO, and CH3OH emission (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00007a).
Each of these ALMA papers uses maps of molecular emission to gather clues about the physical environments in the targeted sources, but because they explore different structures across a range of heliocentric distances, the meaning of ‘high resolution’ varies as well. Bianchi described maps with ∼0.2′′ angular resolution, which corresponds to a linear resolution of about 60 au in Perseus, enough to resolve the two components of SVS13-A. For Wilkins, an angular resolution of ∼5′′ is high relative to previous observations, which largely looked at molecular cloud scales; in the molecular-ring sources, this corresponds to linear resolutions of 104–105 au, enough to differentiate between individual dense clumps. In the extragalactic sources presented by Huang, ‘high resolution’ describes spatial resolution on linear scales of ∼28 and ∼56 pc, comparable to the sizes of (giant) molecular clouds. Thus, this set of papers demonstrated how ALMA can be used to probe the chemistry and physical environment across a range of astronomical scales.
Brünken from Radboud University (The Netherlands) opened the session with results on dissociative ionization of pyridine and benzonitrile (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00015j). The fragmentation products, identified using infrared action spectroscopy at the Free-Electron Lasers for Infrared eXperiments (FELIX) Laboratory, shed light on fragmentation pathways and the implication of using these products as proxies for their cyclic parent molecules. The next two talks covered low-temperature reaction studies using pulsed Laval nozzle setups as well as theoretical modeling to allow for a complete understanding of the reaction mechanisms. Suits, of the University of Missouri (USA) used near-infrared cavity ringdown spectroscopy to demonstrate that the reaction of the vibrationally excited CN (ν = 1) radical with both isomers of butadiene (C4H6) remains fast, on the order of 10−10 cm3 s−1, at temperatures down to 70 K (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00029j). Douglas, of the University of Leeds (UK) focused on a different radical, NH2, with acetaldehyde (CH3CHO) and obtained kinetics for the reaction using pulsed laser photolysis-laser induced fluorescence (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00046j). Jacovella, of the Université Paris-Saclay (France) then showed recent results on the first microwave spectra of norbornadiene (C7H8), a highly photostable bridged molecule, and two of its cyano derivatives (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00016h). While a search for these molecules in the Taurus Molecular Cloud (TMC-1) was unsuccessful, these gas-phase laboratory measurements bring an opportunity to search for constituents of a new category of bridged species in the ISM.
The second half of the morning session started with Gupta of the Universität zu Köln (Germany) presenting a new leak-out spectroscopic technique to measure high-resolution spectra of ionic species. The rovibrational and rotational spectrum for c—C3H2D+ provided in this work allows for searches of this cation using both ground-based radio telescopes and JWST (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00068k). Puzzarini, of the University of Bologna (Italy) and colleagues employed flash vacuum pyrolysis to produce a variety of unstable species like radicals, ions, and unsaturated carbon chains and measure their rotational spectra (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00052d). By exploiting quantum chemical calculations to guide spectral analysis and assignment, they provide essential information for setting up accurate line catalogs for astronomical searches. Balucani, of the Università degli Studi di Perugia (Italy) continued the discussion on the reaction kinetics of neutral radical species with results on N(2D) with benzene using crossed molecular beams under single-collision conditions (https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00057e). The experimental work supported by theoretical calculations provides important updates for the photochemical model of the atmosphere of Titan, the largest moon of Saturn.
The post-lunch session of Day 2 began with Stockett of Stockholm University (Sweden) addressing the challenge of current astrochemical models to reproduce the observed abundances of PAHs in TMC-1. Stockett and colleagues employed a novel experimental method to determine the radiative cooling rate of the cation of 1-cyanonaphthalene (C10H7CN) at the Double ElectroStatic Ion Ring ExpEriment (DESIREE) infrastructure at Stockholm University (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00005b). Fleisher, from NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA) presented timely spectral measurements of the 2ν1 band of H13CN in the shortwave infrared region to support observatories like JWST (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00019b). Lemmens, of Radboud University (The Netherlands) concluded the session with a discussion of PAHs, including a comparison of calculations from the NASA Ames PAH IR spectroscopic database (PAHdb) and state-of-the-art anharmonic calculations with gas-phase direct absorption IR spectra from the NIST chemistry webbook (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2fd00180b). This work validates the use of the 11.2/3.3 μm intensity ratio as the most reliable tracer for determining the size distribution of PAHs in the ISM.
The gas-phase laboratory session highlighted the significance of accurate spectroscopic investigations, reaction kinetics, and parameters of other astrophysically relevant phenomena. Experimental information on many reactive species, including radicals, ions, and PAHs, proposed to be important in interstellar environments still remains limited. The exciting new developments on continuous-wave cavity ringdown in a pulsed Laval flow presented by Suits, leak-out spectroscopy presented by Gupta, and a cross-dispersed spectrometer with a virtually imaged phased array (VIPA) presented by Fleisher—combined with other established experimental techniques presented in this session—promise to provide crucial information for astrochemical models and understanding the fascinating and exotic chemistry of the ISM.
Session 3 of the Faraday Discussion addressed all these aspects. State-of-the-art computational chemistry simulations now manage to reach intrinsic parameters, such as binding energies of radicals onto water ice surfaces, and establish reaction pathways of these radicals with other adsorbed species. These reaction pathways now include branching ratios for the products formed—a central task for chemical modeling that remains very difficult to address experimentally. W. M. C. Sameera, of Hokkaido University (Japan) presented such calculations between radicals and neutrals adsorbed on an ice surface. Specifically, Sameera summarized a study centered on the reaction between the hydroxyl radical (OH) and methanol (CH3OH) leading to the formation of adsorbed hydroxymethyl (CH2 OH) and methoxy (CH3OH) radicals (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00033h) and discussed the branching ratio between these two reactive pathways.
Thermal processing and desorption of multi-component ices were also discussed during the session. The ability of the water ice to trap and preserve volatile species, such as CO2, at higher temperatures (∼140 K) is a well-known phenomenon. This has been further demonstrated in a study of quaternary ice mixtures (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00048f) presented by Murthy Gudipati of NASA JPL (USA). Thermal processes to eject volatiles off the grains are, however, inoperative in colder regions (≤30 K), and the observed gas-phase abundances of molecules, including organic species, at such cold temperatures imply non-thermal mechanisms to counterbalance their depletion onto dust grains.
Session 3 expanded past thermal processing to discuss the role of photons in non-thermal desorption. Whereas the ability for energetic ultraviolet (UV) photons to efficiently photodesorb simple molecular species has been known for decades now, their effect on the observed abundances of complex gas-phase organics is still debated. Building off previous investigations into methanol-containing ices, which showed that UV photodesorption yields were an order of magnitude lower than what had previously been expected, Mathieu Bertin of Sorbonne Université (France) and colleagues estimated UV photodesorption yields for other complex organics (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00004d). Although their work demonstrated that formic acid (HCOOH) and methyl formate (HCOOCH3) ices, like methanol, are negligibly affected by photodesorption, Bertin highlighted that photodesorption efficiencies of organics depend on individual molecules and that the case of methanol cannot be simply extrapolated to other complex species.
Wendy Brown, of the University of Sussex (UK) similarly presented a study focused on the role played by photons, but at much higher wavelengths (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00024a). Mid-infrared photons, although present in a large amount in some cold regions of ISM, were not previously considered as potential vectors for non-thermal desorption. By studying the IR irradiation of mixed CO:H2O ices, Brown and colleagues provided evidence that IR photons trigger the loss of condensed molecules via selective excitation of molecular vibrational motions. Although their study was exploratory, it opens the way toward better constraints on IR photodesorption, a promising process that may compete with other non-thermal phenomena and be of high importance in the context of balancing gas and ice abundances in the ISM.
Serena Viti, of Leiden University (The Netherlands) followed that with an interesting application of machine learning to understand the relationship between binding energies and the abundances of various species (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00008g). Binding energies continue to be some of the most challenging parameters to be measured, and many discrepancies exist within the literature. Viti and co-authors also determined, using a statistical method, which molecules should be prioritized for future astronomical detections in order to better constrain the values of binding energies.
Whereas much of the Faraday Discussion focused on stellar birth, Marie Van de Sande of the University of Leeds (UK) discussed work toward disentangling the joint chemical and physical complexity of stars approaching death (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00039g). Van de Sande presented a new chemical model that more thoroughly addresses chemical kinetics in the outflows of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, which contribute about 80% of the gas incorporated into new clouds. The model by Van de Sande and colleagues demonstrated that chemistry can distinguish between stellar and substellar companions, such as red dwarfs and white dwarfs, respectively.
Stefan Bromley, of the University of Barcelona (Spain) then turned the focus of the Faraday Discussion toward models of upcoming JWST observations of interstellar dust. Bromley described quantum chemical calculations to characterize mid-IR optical properties for a library of Mg-containing silicate nanoparticles, which was in turn used to model the IR spectral features associated with Mg-rich olivine and pyroxene dust grains (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fd00055a). Using MIRI, the effect of intervening nanosilicate features could potentially be used to detect or place limits on the nanosilicate content in dust grains observed in the diffuse interstellar medium.
Together, these discussions demonstrate the breadth of computational astrochemistry to model chemistry across star formation from birth to death as exemplified by Garrod and Van de Sande, respectively. These discussions also described the necessity of computations for observational work, whether to make decisions about what molecules to target as discussed by Viti or to interpret spectroscopic data as illustrated by Bromley. Together, these papers complemented Sessions 2 and 3 in which the experiments presented were often conducted in conjunction with theory or observations.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Sketch notes summarizing Dr Tom Millar's concluding remark that “The foundation of astrochemistry is spectroscopy”. |
Millar ended his talk by complimenting the involvement of early-career researchers in the meeting, citing both their presentations/posters and their engagement during the discussions. As mentioned in the introduction of this article, we also noticed the strong contributions to the meeting made by early-career researchers, and we are excited that leading astrochemists like Millar found this aspect of the Faraday Discussion rewarding.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |