Timur
Islamoglu
a,
Karam B.
Idrees
a,
Florencia A.
Son
a,
Zhijie
Chen
a,
Seung-Joon
Lee
a,
Peng
Li
b and
Omar K.
Farha
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry and International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA. E-mail: o-farha@northwestern.edu
bShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, China
First published on 1st February 2022
Correction for ‘Are you using the right probe molecules for assessing the textural properties of metal–organic frameworks?’ by Timur Islamoglu et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2022, 10, 157–173, DOI: 10.1039/D1TA08021K.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Illustrations of MOFs studied here (NU-1000, NU-1200, NU-1500-Fe, MgMOF-74, UiO-66, ZIF-8, HKUST-1, MOF-808, and SIFSIX-3-Ni) with their corresponding topology and pore size. |
Moreover, the topology label for MOF-808 is incorrect in the Introduction section sentence “MOF-808 (the) is assembled from 6-connected Zr6 clusters and tricarboxylic acid linkers (1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid), forming large spherical cavities (∼20 Å) and small tetrahedral cavities.” The corrected sentence should instead read as follows: “MOF-808 (spn) is assembled from 6-connected Zr6 clusters and tricarboxylic acid linkers (1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid), forming large spherical cavities (∼20 Å) and small tetrahedral cavities.” These errors do not affect the overall conclusions of the article.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022 |