Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Oil foams stabilized by POSS/organosilica particle assemblies: application for aerobic oxidation of aromatic alcohols

Shi Zhang ab, Dmytro Dedovets b and Marc Pera-Titus *ac
aEfficient Products and Processes Laboratory (E2P2L), UMI 3464 CNRS-Solvay, 3966 Jin Du Road, Xin Zhuang Ind Zone, 201108 Shanghai, China. E-mail: marc.pera-titus-ext@solvay.com
bLaboratoire du Futur (LOF), UMR 5258 CNRS-Solvay-Universite Bordeaux 1, 178 Av Dr Albert Schweitzer, 33608 Pessac Cedex, France
cCardiff Catalysis Institute, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK. E-mail: peratitusm@cardiff.ac.uk

Received 24th January 2022 , Accepted 17th March 2022

First published on 4th April 2022


Abstract

A novel amphiphilic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) with surfactant-like behavior was synthesized. By combining this new POSS, used as a frother, with surface-active catalytic organosilica particles, used as a stabilizer, we designed a dual particle system able to generate foams in pure organic solvents. Tunable foamability and foam stability were achieved in a variety of organic solvents by simply adjusting the POSS concentration. As a result, the catalytic activity was drastically boosted in the aerobic oxidation of pure aromatic alcohols under 1 bar O2 pressure. Particles were conveniently recycled with high foamability and the catalytic efficiency was maintained for at least 7 consecutive runs.


1. Introduction

Foams are widely used in industrial applications such as food manufacturing processes, cosmetics, healthcare products, fire extinguishing, wastewater treatment (froth flotation), and enhanced oil recovery.1–4 Recently, foams have been formulated for more elaborate applications such as the manufacture of porous materials5 and catalysis.6 Particle-stabilized (or Pickering) foams are often more attractive compared to surfactant-based counterparts due to their much higher stability under harsh conditions (e.g., shear stress and high temperature). Particle-stabilized aqueous foams have been thoroughly studied using a variety of stabilizers such as polymers,7 proteins,8 particles9 and crystals.10 However, few studies have focused on non-aqueous/oil foams owing to the low surface tension of organic solvents, restricting particle adsorption at the gas–liquid interface. Nonetheless, there is room to design particle-stabilized non-aqueous/oil foams for gas-liquid-solid microreactors comprising water-insoluble reactants.

The formation of foams depends on three main factors. First, the particles need to be dispersed in the solvent and agglomeration should be limited. Second, stable foams can be generated only if the interfacial contact angle of particles lies in the “stability window” range. Contrary to Pickering emulsions, the range of contact angles for foam formation is much narrower,11 making the design of surface-active particles challenging and with limited scope for accessible organic solvents. Third, owing to the much larger size of particles compared to surfactants, the kinetics of particle adsorption at the gas–liquid interface is notably slower, leaving enough time for bubble coalescence before sufficient surface coverage by particles can be achieved. Overall, ideal particles that promote foamability and foam stability should be highly dispersible in the solvent, exhibit an interfacial contact angle in the “stability window” range, and display fast adsorption kinetics. Nonetheless, particles meeting all these requirements simultaneously for a given solvent are scarce. In practice, particle-stabilized foams are often prepared using co-solvents12 or surfactants,13,14 to tune the particle dispersion and interfacial contact angle. The use of co-solvents, however, complicates further product separation and purification steps, whereas the use of surfactants is limited to aqueous foams only,15 as particle–surfactant interactions are driven by hydrophobic forces not existing in organic systems. Moreover, separation and purification in the case of surfactants is not straightforward.

Here we designed a dual particle system for foam stabilization in a broad range of organic reagents, and engineered efficient gas–liquid–solid multiphase microreactors for the aerobic oxidation of alcohols. The system combines surface-active oleophobic (fluorinated) silica particles incorporating Pd nanoparticles, used as stabilizers, and fluorinated anisotropic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSSs), used as frothers. POSS are very small silica nanoparticles with surfactant-like behavior.16,17 They can stabilize foams and tune the wettability of large particles similarly to silica/surfactant mixtures in aqueous systems. Unlike surfactants, POSS can be separated by simply adjusting the liquid composition. POSS are also good candidates for catalytic applications owing to their thermal18 and chemical stability.19–21

2. Results and discussion

2.1. Preparation of surface-active POSS particles

Phenyl-based POSS (i.e. Ph7-POSS) was synthesized by hydrolytic condensation of triethoxylphenylsilane under basic conditions (Fig. 1a) (see the ESI for experimental details).22 The sample was further functionalized with fluorinated chains by reaction with trichloro(1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl)silane (i.e. Ph7/F13-POSS), allowing corner-capping of Si–ONa groups. The 29Si NMR MAS spectrum of Ph7/F13-POSS (Fig. 1b) exhibits two bands at −68.7 and −78.6 ppm. These bands appear within the T3 range and evidence the closure of the POSS cage after the corner-capping reaction.23,24 The Si atom bound directly to the benzene ring has a lower chemical shift due to the higher electron density of phenyl groups.25 The 13C NMR MAS spectra of the samples before and after capping (Fig. S1) show a complex band in the range of 125–138 ppm belonging to aromatic groups.26 Two additional bands are visible at 2.5 and 25 ppm in Ph7/F13-POSS that can be assigned to CH2 groups in fluorinated chains.27 Besides, a broad and complex band appears in the range of 110–120 ppm that can be assigned to CF3 and CF2 groups in fluorinated chains.28 Tetrahydrofuran (THF), which was used as solvent for Ph7-POSS synthesis, is visible in the corresponding spectrum.27 This band vanishes after grafting the fluorinated chains, pointing out the full capping of all Si–ONa groups in Ph7-POSS. The 19F NMR MAS spectrum of Ph7/F13-POSS displays a sharp signal at 80.7 ppm that can be ascribed to CF3 groups (Fig. S2).28 Additional sharp bands are visible in the range of 115–128 ppm that can be ascribed to internal CF2 groups.28
image file: d2ta00667g-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Synthesis of Ph7/F13-POSS. (b) 29Si NMR MAS spectra of Ph7/F13-POSS. (c) FT-IR of Ph7-POSS and Ph7/F13-POSS. (d) TGA of Ph7-POSS and Ph7/F13-POSS.

Ph7-POSS and Ph7/F13-POSS were also analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy (Fig. 1c). Typical bands of silica appear at 1100 cm−1 and 800 cm−1 that can be assigned to asymmetric stretching and bending vibrations of Si–O–Si bonds, respectively.29 A broad band appears in the range of 3000–3500 cm−1 for Ph7-POSS belonging to Si–ONa groups interacting with adsorbed water. This band vanishes for Ph7/F13-POSS, which confirms the capping of Si–ONa groups. Characteristic bands ascribed to the fluorocarbon chain appear at 913, 1171 and 1237 cm−1 that can be assigned to stretching modes of C–Si and C–F (CF2/CF3) bonds, respectively.29 Additional bands at 710 and 670 cm−1 are attributed to the symmetric stretching bands of CF3 groups.30 Bands ascribed to the aromatic skeleton appear at 3100 cm−1 for asymmetric stretching modes of C–H groups, and at 1620 cm−1, 1430 cm−1 and 750 cm−1, that can be attributed to C–H stretching and in-place and out-plane bending vibrations, respectively.31 Additional overtones ascribed to aromatic groups appear in the range of 1750–2000 cm−1.31

TG analysis was used to explore the thermal stability of Ph7-POSS and Ph7/F13-POSS (Fig. 1d). Ph7-POSS exhibits a small weight loss until 100 °C (about 5%) that is attributed to water desorption. Phenyl groups start to decompose at 380 °C with a weight loss of about 37% matching the theoretical value (38.4%). After corner-capping of –ONa groups, Ph7/F13-POSS shows almost no weight loss below 400 °C, but has a higher overall weight loss as compared to Ph7-POSS, up to 600 °C.

The XRD pattern of Ph7/F13-POSS (Fig. S3) exhibits two diffraction bands at 2θ values of ca. 8.3° and 18.9° corresponding to a d-spacing of ca. 11 and 5 Å, respectively, that can be attributed to the overall dimension and body diagonal of the POSS cage, respectively.32 The sample shows a semicrystalline nature which is known to be related to the choice of solvent and lattice stabilization conditions.27

The elementary particle size and aggregation behavior of Ph7/F13-POSS was inspected in different solvents by dynamic light scattering (DLS). In toluene and THF (Fig. S4a and b), which are good solvents for POSS with phenyl groups,33 the average particle size is below 10 nm at low POSS concentration (≤0.1 wt%). This value is in line with the theoretical particle size of Ph7/F13-POSS (1–3 nm),34 with only partial aggregation. However, at a Ph7/F13-POSS concentration above 0.3 wt%, large aggregates are observed in toluene. In contrast, in benzyl alcohol (Fig. S4c), Ph7/F13-POSS is present as aggregates even at extremely low concentration (0.001 wt%).

2.2. Foamability of Ph7/F13-POSS

The foamability of Ph7/F13-POSS was tested in benzyl alcohol (BnOH), anisole and toluene, with a surface tension of 39, 35 and 28.4 mN m−1 at 20 °C, respectively. In all cases, foams are generated after handshaking of a 2 mL sample (Fig. 2a), and the foam height increases with the particle concentration (Fig. 2b). In benzyl alcohol, foams are stable for at least 30 min above 0.3 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS, whereas they destabilize within 1 min in anisole and toluene (Fig. 2c). The foam volume increases with the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration, but the foam stability does not improve (Fig. S5), which may be explained by the low adsorption energy of Ph7/F13-POSS due to its small particle size. We extended our analysis to 39 other liquids (Table S1) to assess the foaming scope of Ph7/F13-POSS (Fig. S6). Ph7/F13-POSS can generate foams provided that the surface tension of the liquid is higher than 27 mN m−1. No foams are produced in very polar liquids (diols and polyols, surface tension ≥45 mN m−1) due to the poor dispersion of Ph7/F13-POSS.
image file: d2ta00667g-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Macroscopic image of foams in benzyl alcohol, anisole and toluene stabilized by 0.5 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS in 2 mL of liquid. (b) Effect of the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration on the foam height at time = 0, and foam lifetime. (c) Dynamic surface tension of benzyl alcohol at variable Ph7/F13-POSS concentrations.

Particle adsorption at gas–liquid and liquid–liquid interfaces is often regarded to have no or marginal effect on the surface tension.14,35,36 However, POSS materials were shown to exhibit interfacial activity similar to surfactants.37 To assess the surface activity of Ph7/F13-POSS at the gas–liquid interface, we measured the surface tension of benzyl alcohol at variable Ph7/F13-POSS concentrationusing the maximum bubble pressure method (Fig. 2d).38 The surface tension of pure benzyl alcohol is 39.6 mN m−1. Upon dispersing 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS, the surface tension decreases to 30 mN m−1, and declines further to 27 mN m−1 at 0.5 wt% concentration. The surface tension drops fast for a surface age within 50[thin space (1/6-em)]000 ms. Beyond this value, it decreases smoothly due to continuous interfacial particle adsorption, and remains almost unchanged above 160[thin space (1/6-em)]000 ms, especially at a POSS concentration above 0.4 wt%.

2.3. Foamability of Ph7/F13-POSS/fluorinated silica particle mixtures

We showed above that Ph7/F13-POSS nanoparticles exhibit surface-active behavior at the gas–liquid interface. However, except for benzyl alcohol, the stability of foams is poor. To promote foam stability, we combined Ph7/F13-POSS with larger oleophobic particles, which can irreversibly adsorb at the gas–liquid interface. A fluorinated organosilica (33 wt% F, 364 nm particle size) was synthesized by the Stöber method using 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltriethoxysilane (PFDTES), 3-mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane (MPTES) and tetraethyl-orthosilicate (TEOS) precursors, with TEOS/MPTES and TEOS/PFDTES molar ratios of 16 and 4, respectively (see the ESI for details). Catalytic Pd nanoparticles were further loaded by wet impregnation using an ethanolic solution of Pd(OAc)2.The final particles were denoted as Pd@SiNP_F17 (1.33 wt% Pd).

The foaming properties of Ph7/F13-POSS and Pd@ SiNP_F17 mixtures were first tested in benzyl alcohol using 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS and 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17 (Fig. 3a and S7). Pd@SiNP_F17 alone, with a contact angle of 95° (Fig. S8), is poorly dispersible at room temperature, and only some bubbles are generated. In parallel, Ph7/F13-POSS alone can make foams (contact angle of 58°, Fig. S9), but their stability at 0.1 wt% is limited to 3 min. When both particles are combined, small amounts of Ph7/F13-POSS helps Pd@SiNP_F17 to disperse (see DLS distributions in Fig. S10a), resulting in modest foaming with a layer of bubbles remaining for 20 min. Increasing the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration to 0.3 wt% at 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17 results in a higher foam height and 1 h stability. Further increase of the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration to 0.5 wt% results in a higher initial foam height, but with much lower stability, also encompassing lower particle dispersion.


image file: d2ta00667g-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Foam height at room temperature with 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17 in 2 mL of (a) benzyl alcohol, (b) anisole and (c) toluene at variable Ph7/F13-POSS concentrations.

Given these results, we extended our analysis to anisole and toluene (Fig. 3b, c, S7, S10b and c). In analogy to BnOH, Pd@SiNP_F17 is poorly wetted and cannot be dispersed in both solvents, resulting in large agglomerates with an average size of about 500 nm that sediment within 2 min. In both cases, Ph7/F13-POSS alone (0.1–0.5 wt%) generates poorly stable foams, which destabilize within 2 min. With 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17 and 0.1–0.3 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS, foams are much more stable (for more than 1 h) with no obvious collapse even after several days (data not shown). Noteworthy, after adding Ph7/F13-POSS, Pd@SiNP_F17 can be dispersed without sedimentation after 10 min, suggesting that Pd@SiNP_F17 particles are surrounded by Ph7/F13-POSS, altering the wettability. The two-particle interactions are driven most likely by van der Waals forces.39 However, the foam stability decreases down to 15 min when the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration is further increased to 0.5 wt%. At these conditions, larger agglomerates are again apparent, disfavoring dispersion. The foam stability at this high Ph7/F13-POSS concentration may be preserved by increasing the Pd@SiNP_F17 concentration to 4 wt% and 6 wt% (Fig. S12). Finally, to show universality of the approach, we obtain highly stable foams in 10 additional liquids using 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17 and 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS (Fig. S13).

To gain more insight into the interactions between Ph7/F13-POSS and Pd@SiNP_F17 particles, we surveyed the effect of Ph7/F13-POSS on the surface tension of benzyl alcohol in the presence of Pd@SiNP_F17 (Fig. 4a). At a low Ph7/F13-POSS concentration (0.1 wt%), the decline of surface tension is less prominent compared to that for Ph7/F13-POSS alone at the same concentration (Fig. 2d). In contrast, at higher concentration (0.3–0.5 wt%), at the overall behavior is comparable to that observed for Ph7/F13-POSS alone. This observation points out a competition between Ph7/F13-POSS and Pd@SiNP_F17 for the gas–liquid interface which is similar to that observed in aqueous particles/surfactant systems.40


image file: d2ta00667g-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) Dynamic surface tension of benzyl alcohol at 1 wt% Pd@ SiNP_F17 and variable Ph7/F13-POSS concentration. (b) Schematic representation of the synergy between Ph7/F13-POSS and Pd@SiNP_F17 particles.

Fig. 4d shows a schematic representation of the Ph7/F13-POSS and Pd@SiNP_F17 systems. Pd@SiNP_F17 particles are predominantly wetted by the gas phase (contact angle >90°) and are therefore badly dispersed in the liquid, resulting in no foam formation. When a small amount of Ph7/F13-POSS nanoparticles is added, they adsorb on Pd@SiNP_F17, embedding the fluorinated chains while exposing phenyl groups to the liquid phase (red curve in Fig. 3a). This results in better particle dispersion. At an optimal Ph7/F13-POSS/Pd@SiNP_F17 ratio, the interfacial contact angle falls into the “foaming window”, resulting in stable foam formation (green curve in Fig. 3a). Further increase of the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration favors Ph7/F13-POSS adsorption at the gas–liquid interface, whereas Pd@SiNP_F17 particles are pushed into the bulk liquid. Foamability continues to increase, while foam stability drops drastically (violet curve in Fig. 3a).

Ph7/F13-POSS can also be applied to phase inversion. A BnOH marble can be stabilized using solely Pd@SiNP_F17 particles, while a mixture of these particles with Ph7/F13-POSS allows foam generation. Ph7/F13-POSS and Pd@SiNP_F17 particles can be separated and isolated from the mixture by washing with THF (see more details in Section 2.5). Then, after drying, Pd@SiNP_F17 can be again used for marble generation.

2.4. Catalysis in benzyl alcohol foams

With these results in hand, we explored the catalytic properties of Pd@SiNP_F17 and Ph7/F13-POSS particle mixtures in the aerobic oxidation of pure benzyl alcohol (BnOH) at 80 °C in the presence of foam. This reaction has been explored in previous studies over transition metal catalysts showing high selectivity to benzaldehyde by avoiding autooxidation.41,42 In these tests, we kept the Pd@SiNP_F17 concentration fixed at 2 wt% while varying the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration (Fig. 5a). Without Ph7/F13-POSS, the benzaldehyde (BAH) yield is only 12% after 2 h, while it increases to 90% after addition of 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS. This is attributed to a better dispersion of Pd@SiNP_F17 particles along with foam generation and transfer of catalytic particles from the bulk to the gas–liquid interface (Fig. 5c and S15). Increasing the Ph7/F13-POSS concentration to 0.3–1.0 wt% results in a lower BAH yield due to foam instability (Fig. 5c and S16). Meanwhile, the interface is mainly populated by Ph7/F13-POSS, while catalytic Pd@SiNP_F17 particles are pushed into the bulk BnOH. A similar reaction pattern is observed at higher Pd@SiNP_F17 concentration and a fixed Ph7/F13-POSS concentration of 0.1 wt% (Fig. 5b). The highest BAH yield (85%) is achieved at 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17, while the highest turnover number (TON) at 2 h (10[thin space (1/6-em)]700 mol mol−1) is obtained with 1 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17. The BAH yield decreases at the highest Pd@SiNP_F17 concentration (4 wt%), encompassing the genesis of very stable foams. As a result, the ‘armored’ gas–liquid interface is expected to show lower permeability and in turn poorer O2 renewal during the reaction.43
image file: d2ta00667g-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) Aerobic oxidation of BnOH over Pd@SiNP_F17 at variable Ph7/F13-POSS concentration. Reaction conditions: 1.5 mL BnOH, O2 flow [10 mL(STP) per min], 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_ F17, 1500 rpm, 80 °C, 2 h. (b) Aerobic oxidation of BnOH over Pd@SiNP_F17 at variable Pd@SiNP_F17 concentration. Reaction conditions: 1.5 mL BnOH, O2 flow [10 mL(STP) per min], 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS, 1500 rpm, 80 °C, 2 h. (c) Optical images of the foam system after the reaction corresponding to (a). (d) Microscopic image of BnOH foam stabilized by 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS and 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17. (e) Fluorescence microscopy image of BnOH foam stabilized by Ph7/F13-POSS and rhodamine b isothiocyanate-loaded fluorinated silica particles.

Optical inspection of the foams after reaction stabilized by a combination of Pd@SiNP_F17 and Ph7/F13-POSS particles reveals the formation of bubbles with a size ranging from 50 to 250 μm (Fig. 5d). By decorating Pd@SiNP_F17 particles with rhodamine b isothiocyanate groups, preferential particle adsorption is observed at the gas–liquid interface (Fig. 5e), confirming the interfacial location of the catalytic particles during the reaction. Indeed, a brighter layer of fluorescent particles is clearly visualized at the boundary of bubbles.

2.5. Particle recycling

The recyclability and reuse of combined 2 wt% Pd@ SiNP_F17 and 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS particles were studied for the aerobic oxidation of BnOH in seven consecutive runs (see experimental details in the ESI). After each run, the Pd@SiNP_F17 and Ph7/F13-POSS particle mixture was separated by centrifugation and washed with THF (Fig. 6a). The solid at the bottom of the centrifugation tube was Pd@SiNP_F17, while Ph7/F13-POSS remained in the supernatant. Pd@SiNP_F17 was further separated by decantation, whereas Ph7/F13-POSS was recovered after THF evaporation. The Ph7/F13-POSS nanoparticles were dried at 80 °C for 4 h before further use in the subsequent run after remixing with Pd@SiNP_F17. Overall, the particles can be reused at least seven times without an appreciable loss of catalytic activity and foamability (Fig. 6b). Ph7/F13-POSS separation is however limited to liquids with polar groups such as BnOH. For non-polar solvents such as toluene, Ph7/F13-POSS can hardly be separated by centrifugation due to their good dispersion. No Pd leaching is observed during the reaction, as inferred by ICP-OES.
image file: d2ta00667g-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (a) Schematic representation of the recycling process. (b) Recyclability and reuse of Pd@SiNP_F17 and Ph7/F13-POSS for the aerobic oxidation of BnOH over seven consecutive runs. Reaction conditions: 1.5 mL BnOH, 2 wt% Pd@SiNP_F17, 0.1 wt% Ph7/F13-POSS, O2 (flow), 1500 rpm, 80 °C, 2 h.

2.6. Scope of aromatic alcohols

We further examined the generality of aromatic alcohol oxidation in foam systems stabilized by a combination of Pd@SiNP_F17 and Ph7/F13-POSS particles in an O2 flow (Table 1). The results obtained in the presence of Ph7/F13-POSS (0.1 wt%) clearly demonstrate higher activity of this system in the oxidation of aromatic alcohols compared to experiments without Ph7/F13-POSS. For 1-phenylethanol, the acetophenone yield is 50% after 2 h reaction at 100 °C in the foam system containing Ph7/F13-POSS. This value is about 9 times higher than the yield obtained without Ph7/F13-POSS. The conversion of methylbenzyl alcohol into the corresponding aldehyde in the presence of foam stabilized by Ph7/F13-POSS is 79% at 120 °C after 2 h, while the yield is only 30% without Ph7/F13-POSS. The oxidation of cinnamyl alcohol to cinnamaldehyde shows a yield of 46% at 80 °C after 1 h under foam in the presence of Ph7/F13-POSS, whereas the yield without Ph7/F13-POSS is only 12%. Finally, the conversion of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde at 100 °C is 61% and 87% after 0.5 and 1 h, respectively.
Table 1 Substrate scope expansion for catalytic tests in an O2 flowa
Reactant Pd@SiNP_F17/wt% Ph7/F13-POSS/wt% T/°C t/h Yield/%
a Reaction conditions: 1.5 mL substrate, 1500 rpm, O2 flow rate [20 mL(STP) per min], and 1 bar O2.
image file: d2ta00667g-u1.tif 2 100 2 5.6
2 0.1 100 2 50
image file: d2ta00667g-u2.tif 2 120 2 30
2 0.1 120 2 79
image file: d2ta00667g-u3.tif 1 80 1 12
1 0.1 80 1 46
image file: d2ta00667g-u4.tif 2 0.1 100 0.5 61
2 0.1 100 1 87


3. Conclusions

In summary, we prepared oil foams stabilized by a dual particle system combining surface-active catalytic organosilica particles, used as stabilizer, and a novel type of amphiphilic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) with surfactant-like properties, used as frother. Both the foamability and foam stability in aromatic solvents are promoted in the presence of a low concentration of POSS, favoring the dispersion of catalytic organosilica particles driven by the interaction between the fluorinated chains of organosilica and POSS particles. As a result, the catalytic activity is drastically enhanced in the presence of POSS with a 9-time increase of the benzaldehyde yield in the oxidation of benzyl alcohol in pure O2 compared to a catalytic test without POSS. Intermediate foam stability, affording a high gas exchange rate, was required to achieve high catalytic activity. The particles were conveniently recycled with high foamability and the catalytic efficiency was maintained for at least 7 consecutive runs. The dual particle catalytic system was successfully applied to a range of aromatic alcohols, demonstrating the versatility of our approach.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the ERC grant Michelangelo (contract number #771586).

Notes and references

  1. E. Dickinson, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 2010, 15, 40–49 CrossRef CAS .
  2. R. Farajzadeh, A. Andrianov, R. Krastev, G. J. Hirasaki and W. R. Rossen, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2012, 183, 1–13 CrossRef PubMed .
  3. K. A. Matis and P. Mavros, Sep. Purif. Methods, 1991, 20, 163–198 CrossRef CAS .
  4. R. Höfer, F. Jost, M. J. Schwuger, R. Scharf, J. Geke, J. Kresse, H. Lingmann, R. Veitenhansel and W. Erwied, Foams and Foam Control, VCH, Weinheim, 1988, vol. 11 Search PubMed .
  5. R. Murakami and A. Bismarck, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2010, 20, 732–737 CrossRef CAS .
  6. J. Huang, F. Cheng, B. P. Binks and H. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 15015–15025 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  7. A. L. Fameau, A. Carl, A. Saint-Jalmes and R. Von Klitzing, ChemPhysChem, 2015, 16, 66–75 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  8. A. R. Cox, D. L. Aldred and A. B. Russell, Food Hydrocolloids, 2009, 23, 366–376 CrossRef CAS .
  9. B. P. Binks and T. S. Horozov, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 3722–3725 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  10. B. P. Binks and H. Shi, Langmuir, 2020, 36, 991–1002 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  11. T. N. Hunter, R. J. Pugh, G. V. Franks and G. J. Jameson, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2008, 137, 57–81 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  12. R. Murakami and A. Bismarck, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2010, 20, 732–737 CrossRef CAS .
  13. Y. Han, J. Yang, M. Jung, S. Han, S. Kim and H. S. Jeon, Langmuir, 2020, 36, 10331–10340 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  14. A. Maestro, E. Rio, W. Drenckhan, D. Langevin and A. Salonen, Soft Matter, 2014, 10, 6975–6983 RSC .
  15. L. R. Arriaga, W. Drenckhan, A. Salonen, J. A. Rodrigues, R. Íñiguez-Palomares, E. Rio and D. Langevin, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 11085–11097 RSC .
  16. Z. Wang, Y. Li, X. H. Dong, X. Yu, K. Guo, H. Su, K. Yue, C. Wesdemiotis, S. Z. D. Cheng and W. Bin Zhang, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 1345–1352 RSC .
  17. K. Wu, M. Huang, K. Yue, C. Liu, Z. Lin, H. Liu, W. Zhang, C. H. Hsu, A. C. Shi, W. Bin Zhang and S. Z. D. Cheng, Macromolecules, 2014, 47, 4622–4633 CrossRef CAS .
  18. N. Ahmed, H. Fan, P. Dubois, X. Zhang, S. Fahad, T. Aziz and J. Wan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 21577–21604 RSC .
  19. L. A. Bivona, O. Fichera, L. Fusaro, F. Giacalone, M. Buaki-Sogo, M. Gruttadauria and C. Aprile, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 5000–5007 RSC .
  20. C. H. Lu and F. C. Chang, ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 481–488 CrossRef CAS .
  21. P. Sangtrirutnugul, T. Chaiprasert, W. Hunsiri, T. Jitjaroendee, P. Songkhum, K. Laohhasurayotin, T. Osotchan and V. Ervithayasuporn, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 12812–12822 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  22. K. Koh, S. Sugiyama, T. Morinaga, K. Ohno, Y. Tsujii, T. Fukuda, M. Yamahiro, T. Iijima, H. Oikawa, K. Watanabe and T. Miyashita, Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 1264–1270 CrossRef CAS .
  23. V. Vij, T. S. Haddad, G. R. Yandek, S. M. Ramirez and J. M. Mabry, Silicon, 2012, 4, 267–280 CrossRef CAS .
  24. H. Araki and K. Naka, Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 6039–6045 CrossRef CAS .
  25. W. Wang, W. Ding, J. Yu, M. Fei and J. Tang, J. Polym. Res., 2012, 19, 9948 CrossRef .
  26. M. Ye, Y. Wu, W. Zhang and R. Yang, Res. Chem. Intermed., 2018, 44, 4277–4294 CrossRef CAS .
  27. S. T. Iacono, A. Vij, W. Grabow, D. W. Smith and J. M. Mabry, Chem. Commun., 2007, 4992–4994 RSC .
  28. L. Van Ravenstein, W. Ming, R. D. Van de Grampel, R. Van der Linde, G. de With, T. Loontjens, P. C. Thüne and J. W. Niemantsverdriet, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 408–413 CrossRef CAS .
  29. G. D. Chukin and V. I. Malevich, J. Appl. Spectrosc., 1977, 26, 223–229 CrossRef .
  30. S. M. S. Shahabadi, H. Rabiee, S. M. Seyedi, A. Mokhtare and J. A. Brant, J. Membr. Sci., 2017, 537, 140–150 CrossRef .
  31. Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds, https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/31568 Search PubMed.
  32. D. B. Cordes, P. D. Lickiss and F. Rataboul, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 2081–2173 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  33. A. J. Guenthner, K. R. Lamison, L. M. Lubin, T. S. Haddad and J. M. Mabry, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51, 12282–12293 CrossRef CAS .
  34. W. Zhang, G. Camino and R. Yang, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2017, 67, 77–125 CrossRef CAS .
  35. A. P. Kotula and S. L. Anna, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 10759–10772 RSC .
  36. A. Stocco, E. Rio, B. P. Binks and D. Langevin, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 1260–1267 RSC .
  37. H. Hou, J. Li, X. Li, J. Forth, J. Yin, X. Jiang, B. A. Helms and T. P. Russell, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 10142–10147 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  38. V. B. Fainerman, V. D. Mys, A. V. Makievski and R. Miller, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2006, 304, 222–225 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  39. Y. Xue, H. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Dai, L. Feng, X. Wang and T. Lin, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 4814–4818 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  40. R. Pichot, F. Spyropoulos and I. T. Norton, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2012, 377, 396–405 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  41. M. Sankar, E. Nowicka, E. Carter, D. M. Murphy, D. W. Knight, D. Bethell and G. J. Hutchings, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 1–6 Search PubMed .
  42. S. Meher and R. K. Rana, Green Chem., 2019, 21, 2494–2503 RSC .
  43. S. Zhang, D. Dedovets, A. Feng, K. Wang and M. Pera-Titus, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144(4), 1729–1738 CrossRef CAS PubMed .

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d2ta00667g

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.