Yingzheng
Lin
ab,
Yitao
Cao
b,
Qiaofeng
Yao
*b and
Jianping
Xie
*ab
aJoint School of National University of Singapore and Tianjin University, International Campus of Tianjin University, Binhai New City, Fuzhou 350207, P. R. China
bDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore. E-mail: chexiej@nus.edu.sg; qfyao@tjufz.org.cn
First published on 25th March 2022
Alloy nanoparticles represent one of the most important metal materials, finding increasing applications in diverse fields of catalysis, biomedicine, and nano-optics. However, the structural evolution of bimetallic nanoparticles in their full composition spectrum has been rarely explored at the molecular and atomic levels, imparting inherent difficulties to establish a reliable structure–property relationship in practical applications. Here, through an inter-particle reaction between [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− nanoparticles or nanoclusters (NCs), which possess the same number of metal atoms, but different atomic packing structures, we reveal the composition-dependent structural evolution of alloy NCs in the alloying process at the molecular and atomic levels. In particular, an inter-cluster reaction can produce three sets of AuxAg44−x NCs in a wide composition range, and the structure of AuxAg44−x NCs evolves from Ag-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− (x = 1–12), to evenly mixed [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (x = 19–24), and finally to Au-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (x = 40–43) NCs, with the increase of the Au/Ag atomic ratio in the NC composition. In addition, leveraging on real-time electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), we reveal the different inter-cluster reaction mechanisms for the alloying process in the sub-3-nm regime, including partial decomposition–reconstruction and metal exchange reactions. The molecular-level inter-cluster reaction demonstrated in this study provides a fine chemistry to customize the composition and structure of bimetallic NCs in their full alloy composition spectrum, which will greatly increase the acceptance of bimetallic NCs in both basic and applied research.
In the past two decades, atomically precise metal nanoclusters (NCs) have been extensively studied in both basic chemical science and practical applications.10–13 Metal NCs are ultrasmall particles with a typical core size of <2 nm. Advances in cluster chemistry in the past two decades have allowed the synthesis of dozens of mono-, bi- and multi-metallic NCs with molecular purity, which make them descriptive with a molecular formula.14–17 For example, AuxAgy(SR)z denotes an alloy NC consisting of x Au atoms, y Ag atoms, and z thiolate (SR) ligands. The atomically precise structure of metal NCs together with their size-dependent molecular properties (e.g., optical absorption and luminescence) provides an ideal platform for revealing alloying chemistry at the molecular and atomic levels.18–23
Metal NCs with an atomically precise structure are ideal model metal nanoparticles for studying the structural evolution of alloy nanoparticles in the composition changing process. For the special case of AuxAg25−x(SR)18 NCs, their continuous composition control has been achieved in the full spectrum of x = 0–25. For example, an inter-cluster reaction method between Au25(SR)18 and Ag25(SR)18 has been recently used to produce AuxAg25−x(SR)18 NCs in a full spectrum of x = 1–24.24,25 In addition to coinage metals, other transition metals (e.g., Ir) can also be doped into Au25(SR)18 NCs (e.g., Au22Ir3(SR)18) via an inter-cluster reaction.26 In addition, the reaction of the parental Au25(SR)18 with the Ag(I) precursors can form Au-rich AuxAg25−x(SR)18 NCs,27–31 while the reaction of Ag25(SR)18 with Au(I) precursors can produce Ag-rich AuxAg25−x(SR)18 NCs with x = 1–7.32–34 However, except the ubiquitous alloy NC family of AuxAg25−x(SR)18 NCs, in which Au25(SR)18 and Ag25(SR)18 adopt the same framework, most of the Au and Ag based NCs with the same metal number show distinct structures. This is probably due to the different coordination habits of Au and Ag atoms, where Ag atoms possess a relatively flexible coordination sphere and thus can form Ag-SR protecting motifs with diverse structures (e.g., mount-like Ag2(SR)5 motif in [Ag44(SR)30]4− and staple-like SR-[Ag-SR]2 motif in [Ag25(SR)18]−).35–37 In contrast, Au atoms prefer the staple-like SR-[Au-SR]x motifs ubiquitously in [Aun(SR)m]q NCs.38 Such distinct differences in the coordination habits are well reflected by the crystal structures of [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2−, which have the same number of metal atoms but different packing modes. Specifically, [Ag44(SR)30]4− has a hollow icosahedral Ag12-based Ag32 core capped by six mount-like Ag2(SR)5 motifs,35,36 while [Au44(SR)26]2− has a bi-icosahedral-based Au29 core capped by two terminal SR, three SR-Au-SR, and six SR-[Au-SR]2 motifs.39 It is also worth noting that the reported alloy AuxAg44−x NCs so far exclusively adopted the M–S framework of [Ag44(SR)30]4−, where up to 12 Ag atoms are substitutable by Au atoms.35,40–42 Therefore, [Ag44(SR)30]4−, [Au44(SR)26]2− and their alloy NCs provide an ideal platform for decoding the composition dependent alloying chemistry at the molecular and atomic levels, although an efficient synthetic method should be developed for fine tuning the composition of alloy AuxAg44−x NCs in a wide composition range.
Here, we report the synthesis of alloy AuxAg44−x NCs with a wide composition range by an inter-cluster reaction between [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2−, which possess an identical number of metal atoms, but a different number of SR ligands and different atomic packing structures. To exclude any possible ligand effects on the structural evolution of alloy NCs, we chose the same para-mercaptobenzoic acid (p-MBA) as the model thiolate ligand in both parental NCs. Indeed, by simply adjusting the molar ratio of Au44 and Ag44 NCs (hereinafter referred to as RAu44/Ag44) in the inter-cluster reaction, the composition of AuxAg44−x NCs can be fine-tuned within a wide range, i.e., x = 1–12, 19–24 and 40–43. More intriguingly, with the increase of the Au content (i.e., x value) in AuxAg44−x NCs, the cluster structure evolves from [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− (x = 1–12), through [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (x = 19–24), and finally to [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (x = 40–43), where the intermediate species [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs (x = 19–24) were captured for the first time in this study. Moreover, based on extensive real-time electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry analysis, we have identified different reaction pathways for the inter-cluster reactions, including partial decomposition-reconstruction and metal exchange reactions, which depends on the structural similarity of the NC reactants involved in the inter-cluster reactions.
One of the most interesting findings is the dosage-dependent M–S framework in the alloy (Au/Ag)44 NCs. When more [Ag44(SR)30]4− NCs (compared to [Au44(SR)26]2−; RAu44/Ag44 = 1:
40 to 1
:
2) were added to the reaction mixture, the final NC product of the inter-cluster reaction is [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− (x = 1–12), which preserves the framework of [Ag44(SR)30]4−. As shown in Fig. 2b, the number of Au atoms in [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− gradually increases from 1 to 12, as the availability of [Au44(SR)26]2− increases in the reaction (i.e., RAu44/Ag44 increases from 1
:
40 to 1
:
2). The as-obtained [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs (x = 1–12) exhibit different UV-vis absorption features, and thus they show variable solution color from pink to light brown (Fig. 2a, inset of Fig. 2b). In particular, the dominant species are [Au1Ag43(SR)30]4− and [Ag44(SR)30]4−, when RAu44/Ag44 is 1/40. In addition to the dominant [Au1Ag43(SR)30]4− and [Ag44(SR)30]4−, a minor amount of [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs with x = 2–12 was also seen in the mass spectrum recorded at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/40 (Fig. 2b, 1st spectrum). The substitution of up to 12 Ag atoms in [Ag44(SR)30]4− by Au atoms is in good agreement with previous reports,35,41 while the x value of the dominant species largely depends on the availability of [Au44(SR)26]2− (vide infra). Due to the low x values in the dominant alloy NC species at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/40, the corresponding UV-vis absorption spectra still maintain the same characteristics of [Ag44(SR)30]4− (Fig. 2a, 1st curve), which suggests that replacing one or few Ag atoms of [Ag44(SR)30]4− with Au atoms can merely change the electronic structure of the NC products. A facile and effective way to adjust the value of x in the dominant [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− species is to change the dosage of [Au44(SR)26]2−.
By increasing RAu44/Ag44 while maintaining the same concentration of [Ag44(SR)30]4−, more Au atoms can be incorporated into [Ag44(SR)30]4−. For example, the inter-cluster reaction between [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/10 (Fig. 2b, 4th spectrum) produced dominant [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs with x = 6–8. It should be noted that when the dominant x increases to 6–8, the adsorption peak at 488 nm in their UV-vis absorption spectra becomes broadened (Fig. 2a, 4th curve). It is possible to further increase the number of Au atoms incorporated in [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs at a higher feeding dosage of [Au44(SR)26]2−, where the maximal x value was recorded to be 12. In particular, [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− is the dominant species, when RAu44/Ag44 increases to 1/4, 1/3, and 1/2 (Fig. 2b, 8th, 9th, and 10th spectra), and their UV-vis absorption spectra show typical absorption peaks of [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− at 390 and 490 nm with three humps at 546, 620, and 728 nm (Fig. 2a, 8th, 9th, and 10th curves; and Fig. S1†). The perfect agreement between the experimental and simulated isotope patterns of [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− (Fig. 2f) unambiguously verifies that the dominant NC product generated by the inter-cluster reaction is [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− (the simulated mass spectra for all [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs (x = 1–12) are shown in Fig. S2†). It is worth noting that the UV-vis absorption spectrum of the product NCs obtained at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/2 is less distinct than those acquired at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/3 and 1/4 (Fig. 2a, 8th, 9th, and 10th curves). Such diminishing features should be attributed to a small amount of impurities generated in the inter-cluster reaction, as confirmed by ESI-MS analysis (Fig. S3†). As the feeding atomic ratio of Au/Ag at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/2 is larger than the Au/Ag ratio in [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− (1/2.6), there should be an excess of [Au44(SR)26]2− in the reaction solution. However, we did not identify any [Au44(SR)26]2− in the mass spectrum of the final product at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/2, where extensive signals corresponding to Au/Ag-SR complexes were observed. Therefore, we speculate that partial decomposition of the two parental NCs occurred as a side reaction accompanying the inter-cluster reaction.
Interestingly, when [Au44(SR)26]2− dominates the reaction mixture, the reaction between [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2− tends to form [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− NCs (i.e., the same ligand number of 26 as [Au44(SR)26]2−), which adopt the same M–S framework as [Au44(SR)26]2−. As shown in the top three spectra in Fig. 2d, the introduction of a small amount of [Ag44(SR)30]4− (RAu44/Ag44 = 40/1, 30/1, and 20/1) in the reaction produced Au-rich alloy NCs (i.e., [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− with x = 42–44). The perfect match between the experimental and simulated isotope patterns of [Au43Ag1(p-MBA)26-H]3− and [Au42Ag2(p-MBA)26-H]3− confirms the accuracy of our mass spectrum assignment (Fig. 2g, S4a and b†). Similar to [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− with x = 0–1 (Fig. 2a, 1st curve), slight Ag doping also has a marginal effect on the electronic structure of [Au44(SR)26]2−, which is evidenced by its almost identical UV-vis absorption spectrum to that of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (x = 42–44; Fig. 2c, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd curves). More interestingly, as the RAu44/Ag44 ratio decreases to 10/1, 8/1, and 6/1, except for the Au-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− NCs (x = 39–43) with decreasing number of Au atoms, a set of new peaks at m/z = 3500–3700 were observed in the mass spectra of the product NCs (Fig. 2d, 4th–6th spectra). These new cluster peaks can be assigned to [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (x = 20–24), with a new ligand number of 27 and a comparable number of Ag and Au atoms. The accuracy of our assignment was verified by the isotope pattern analysis of [Au21Ag23(SR)27]3−, where the experimental and simulated patterns are in good agreement (Fig. 2f; the simulated mass spectra of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs (x = 20–22) are shown in Fig. S5a–d†). Since these two sets of alloy NCs ([AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2−) coexist in the product solution, the UV-vis absorption spectra exhibit less distinct peaks (Fig. 2c, 4th–6th curves). As the ratio of [Ag44(SR)30]4− (RAu44/Ag44 = 5/1 and 4/1) in the reaction further increases, the peak intensity of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− decreases, while those of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− increase (Fig. 2d, 7th and 8th spectra). Based on the above observation, it is obvious that a structural transformation from [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− into [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− would occur as the Ag content in the framework of AuxAg44−x increases. The Ag content-induced structural transformation was further verified by the increased abundance of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− with the increasing dosage of [Ag44(SR)30]4−. In particular, [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− becomes the dominant product at RAu44/Ag44 = 3/1 and 2/1 (Fig. 2d, 9th and 10th spectra). Although the same alloy framework of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− can be obtained at RAu44/Ag44 = 3/1 and 2/1, the specific content of Ag seems to be tunable by the feeding ratio of [Ag44(SR)30]4−. The dominant x values were recorded to be 19–21 at RAu44/Ag44 = 2/1, while those documented at RAu44/Ag44 = 3/1 were 20–22 (Fig. 2d, 9th and 10th spectra, Fig. S5†). Taken together, by changing the dosage of [Ag44(SR)30]4− while keeping [Au44(SR)26]2− as the dominant cluster (i.e., RAu44/Ag44 = 2:
1 to 40
:
1) in the feeding cluster mixture, two families of alloy NCs with different M–S frameworks can be produced, including [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (x = 40–43) and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (x = 19–24), where the former features rich Au atoms and the latter possesses comparable Au and Ag atoms.
In general, the Au/Ag ratio in the final alloy NC products decreases with the decrease of feeding RAu44/Ag44 (Fig. S6†). In particular, only a few Ag atoms can be incorporated into [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (average Au/Ag ratio >80) under high feeding RAu44/Ag44 (10 < RAu44/Ag44 < 40) (Fig. S6a†). With the decrease of RAu44/Ag44 (0.5 < RAu44/Ag44 < 8), the alloy frameworks change to [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− with an average Au/Ag ratio of 0.4 to 3.7 (Fig. S6b†). Further decreasing the RAu44/Ag44 to below 0.5, the alloy products can keep the framework of [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− with an average Au/Ag ratio ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 (Fig. S6c†). In addition to the metal ratios and structures, the valence electron count of the alloy NC products is also highly related to those of the reactants. In particular, the valence electron count of [Au44(SR)26]2− is 20, while that of [Ag44(SR)30]4− is 18. Therefore, tuning the RAu44/Ag44 would also change the number of electrons participating in the reactions. As shown in Table S1,† when the average feeding electrons are less than 19, the alloy products are [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs featuring a valence electron count of 18. If the average feeding electrons increase to more than 19, the inter-cluster reactions produce [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs, whose valence electron counts are 20.
In the reaction system of RAu44/Ag44 = 1/3, real-time UV-vis absorption and ESI mass spectra show that [Ag44(SR)30]4− gradually evolves into [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4−, and the number of Au atoms gradually increases in [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− (Fig. 3a and d). Specifically, at the initial reaction time (t = 2 min), [Ag44(SR)30]4− is still the main species in the reaction mixture with a negligible amount of [Au1Ag43(SR)30]4− (Fig. 3d, 1st spectrum). However, regarding the Au-related species, only a few new peaks of Au-SR complexes appear at m/z = 1000–2000 (Fig. S7†), indicating that [Au44(SR)26]2− has been decomposed after mixing with [Ag44(SR)30]4−. As the reaction proceeds to t = 30 and 60 min, the dominant species have developed into [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− (x > 5), and the increase of Au doping induces a significant change in the UV-vis absorption spectra, where the absorption peak at 488 nm broadens and the peak intensity at 646 nm deceases sharply (Fig. 3a, 5th and 6th curves, and Fig. 3d, 3rd and 4th spectra). As the reaction time increases to t = 120 and 180 min, the population of [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− shifts toward the high x end, where the maximal x value is 12 (Fig. 3d, 5th and 6th spectra). More interestingly, as this reaction proceeds to 20 h, [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− gradually becomes dominant in the final product via a size-focusing process (Fig. 3a, 7th curve and Fig. 3d, 7th spectrum). It should be noted that the atomic ratio of Au/Ag in [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− and [Au11Ag33(SR)30]4− is 1/2.6 and 1/3, respectively, which is close to the feeding ratio of Au44/Ag44 = 1/3. These data also suggest that the atomic efficiency of the inter-cluster reaction is high. Therefore, in the presence of excess [Ag44(SR)30]4−, [Au44(SR)26]2− will react with [Ag44(SR)30]4− most likely through the decomposition mechanism, where [Au44(SR)26]2− will decompose into smaller cluster or complex species. The as-formed smaller cluster or complex species will then react with [Ag44(SR)30]4−, resulting in the substitution of Ag atoms by Au atoms while keeping the M–S framework of [Ag44(SR)30]4− unchanged. With sufficient supply of [Au44(SR)26]2−, this decomposition-substitution mechanism can incorporate up to 12 Au heteroatoms into [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs.
On the other hand, when the inter-cluster reaction starts with an excess of [Au44(SR)26]2− NCs, the structural evolution pathway is distinctly different from the above one. Taking the reaction at RAu44/Ag44 = 3/1 as an example, there are several Ag atoms incorporated into the framework of [Au44(SR)26]2−, leading to the formation of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− NCs with x = 40–43 in the initial stage (t = 2 and 10 min; Fig. 3e, 1st and 2nd spectra). Meanwhile, ESI mass spectra in a broad m/z range show a set of peaks at m/z = 2200–2600, which can be attributed to [AuxAg44−x(L)30]4− (x = 1–12; L denotes SR or Cl) (Fig. S8†). It should be noted that up to 3 Cl ligands can be incorporated into the protecting shell of [AuxAg44−x(L)30]4− (x = 1–12), which suggests that the alloying reaction is most probably initiated by disturbing the protecting shell of [Ag44(SR)30]4−. [AuxAg44−x(L)30]4− NCs (x = 1–12) NCs were consumed in the next stage of reaction (t = 30 and 60 min), accompanied by an increase of Ag doping in [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− NCs with x = 35–43 (Fig. 3e, 3rd and 4th spectra). In the meantime, with the diminishing of [AuxAg44−x(L)30]4− (x = 1–12) there is the emergence of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs with x = 17–24 (Fig. 3e, 3rd and 4th spectra). As the reaction proceeds to t = 120 and 180 min, more [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs were formed at the expense of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (Fig. 3e, 5th and 6th spectra). The UV-vis absorption spectra taken at this stage (t = 120 and 180 min) show no distinct peaks, which are most probably the miscellaneous and partially overlapping absorption features of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (Fig. 3b, 5th and 6th curves). At the last stage of the reaction (t = 20 h), [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− becomes dominant, and its x distribution is narrowed to x = 20–22, while [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− has extinguished. Therefore, the two shoulder peaks at 500 and 690 nm in the 7th curve of Fig. 3b should be attributed to [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (x = 20–22). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the production of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs with molecular purity and a well-defined absorption spectrum.
To understand the structural correlation between [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (x = 19–24) and Au-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (x = 40–43) NCs, we performed the inter-cluster reaction at a higher dosage of [Au44(SR)26]2−. The reaction at RAu44/Ag44 = 6/1 produced a composition and structure evolution pathway similar to that at RAu44/Ag44 = 3/1 (Fig. 3c, f and S9†). Specifically, Ag atoms are first doped into [Au44(SR)26]2− to produce [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (x = 40–43, Fig. 3f, 1st and 2nd spectra). As the amount of Ag doping increases, [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− appears and becomes more abundant (Fig. 3f, 5th–7th spectrum). Since more [Au44(SR)26]2− NCs are available at RAu44/Ag44 = 6/1 than that at RAu44/Ag44 = 3/1, it took a longer time (∼120 min) for [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− to be consumed (Fig. 3f, 5th spectrum). The final product obtained at RAu44/Ag44 = 6/1 is a mixture of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, which means that the limited availability of [Ag44(SR)30]4− in the reaction solution is not able to convert all Au-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− into [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (Fig. 3f, 7th spectrum). Similarly, the co-existence of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− produces an apparently featureless UV-vis absorption spectrum (Fig. 3c, 7th curve).
Based on the above observation, we are now able to propose a plausible mechanism for the inter-cluster and alloying reaction between [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2−. The most important finding in the inter-cluster reaction is the feeding dosage-dependent M–S framework in the final alloy NCs, which stems from the composition-sensitive stability of the M–S framework. Taking the inter-cluster reaction in the presence of excess [Au44(SR)26]2− NCs as an example, the reaction between [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− would first induce metal exchange between two parental NCs, giving rise to [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4−. Due to the excess availability of [Au44(SR)26]2−, the increasing Au doping in [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− will sharply disturb its structural stability, thereby inducing its decomposition in the early stage of the reaction (e.g., t = 2–10 min at RAu44/Ag44 = 3/1). The decomposed Ag-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− will then serve as an Ag source to react with Au-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2−, increasing the doping amount of Ag in the latter. On the other hand, as the amount of Ag doping in [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− increases, the structural stability of M44S26 will be compromised, which induces the transformation of Au-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− into [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−. Therefore, the composition and the M–S framework of the final NC products are determined by the feeding ratio of [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4−. In general, the feeding ratio of [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− determines the composition of the metal core in (Au/Ag)44 NCs, and the composition of the metal core will further direct the formation of the M–S framework. The Au-rich metal core prefers the M44S26 framework of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− (x = 40–43), while the Ag-rich core favors the M44S30 framework of [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− (x = 1–12). An evenly mixed Au/Ag core would lead to the formation of a M44S27 framework in [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− (x = 19–24). On the other hand, as the two parental NCs are both capped by p-MBA ligands, it is also crucial to investigate how the ligands involve in the actual exchange of metal atoms. We performed the inter-cluster reaction between [Au44(p-MBA)26]2− and bi-ligand protected [Ag44(p-MBA)30−y(NTP)y]4− NCs (y = 0, 3, 5, 9) (Fig. S10†) with different RAu44/Ag44. As shown in Fig. S11,† the final alloy products synthesized from bi-ligand protected [Ag44(p-MBA)30−y(NTP)y]4− NCs show consistent UV-vis absorption features with those synthesized by mono-ligand protected [Ag44(p-MBA)30]4− NCs, indicating their similar metal composition and structure. Therefore, in this inter-cluster reaction, the ligands show marginal effects on the reaction fate, as long as the ligands are capable of maintaining the geometric structure of the parental NCs. A similar observation has been reported in inter-cluster reaction literature, where the heterogeneity in the ligand shell can accelerate the inter-cluster reaction kinetics, but hardly affects the profile of final products.28
In order to provide more information about the structural similarity among the (Au/Ag)44 alloy NCs, we compared the ion mobility of [Au44(SR)26]2−, [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2−, [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, and [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). As shown in Fig. S12,† with the increase of the Ag atom ratio in the alloy (Au/Ag)44 frameworks, the mobility of alloy NCs increases due to the larger charge-to-mass ratio. More importantly, the mobility of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− falls in between those of [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4−, indicating that [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs most probably share a combined structural feature of [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− NCs. In addition, tandem mass (MS/MS) analysis was also conducted to compare the fragmentation behavior of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− NCs, which can further provide information on the surface features of targeted alloy NCs (Fig. S13 and S14†). In particular, the 4-peak of [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− was chosen as a parent ion in the MS/MS analysis. As shown in Fig. S13,† [Au12Ag32(SR)30]4− can be fragmented in a stripping-off way during the MS/MS process, where the fragment cluster ions were produced by successive dissociation of [M(SR)2]− (M = Au and Ag). A similar preferential dissociation of [Au(SR)2]− was observed in the MS/MS spectra of [Au21Ag23(SR)27-H]4−. As shown in Fig. S14,† as the collision energy increases from 5 to 20 eV, [Au(SR)2]− was dissociated from [Au21Ag23(SR)27-H]4− to generate [Au20Ag23(SR)25-H]3−. A similar dissociation of [M(SR)2]− in their fragmentation process suggests structural similarity between [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4−, further supporting the above PAGE data.
By contrast, the reaction between [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− proceeds through a completely different mechanism. [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− was prepared by an inter-cluster reaction between [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2− at RAu44/Ag44 = 2/1, followed by adding another 3 equivalents of [Ag44(SR)30]4− into the as-prepared [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− to make the total RAu44/Ag44 = 1/2. One of the most noticeable differences is the accelerated reaction kinetics between [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, which is readily indicated by the diminishing of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− in their ESI mass spectrum after 2 h of mixing (Fig. 4b, 2nd spectrum). In addition, we also captured a larger number of Au-SR, Ag-SR, and Ag–Au-SR complexes in the reaction system of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [Ag44(SR)30]4−, in comparison to that observed in its reaction with [Au44(SR)26]2− (Fig. S15†). The extensive formation of Au/Ag-SR complexes should be attributed to the decomposition of the parental [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− NCs. The composition of the final NC product still depends on the dosage of feeding NCs. As the total RAu44/Ag44 is 1/2, the inter-cluster reaction between [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− produced [Au12Ag32(SR)30−bClb]4− (b = 0–1) as the main product. Besides the prominent peaks of [Au12Ag32(SR)30−bClb]4− (b = 0–1), several peaks can also be identified at m/z = 3200–3800 (Fig. 4b, 2nd and 3rd spectra), which should be the side products from the decomposition of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−. However, their detailed assignment is impossible due to the low signal-to-noise ratio. Of particular note, the mass spectrum pattern of the final product delivered by the inter-cluster reaction between [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− is inconsistent with that produced by the direct reaction of [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− (Fig. 4b, 3rd and 4th spectra). These data suggest that the alloying reaction between [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− might occur through a decomposition-reconstruction mechanism, where the parental NCs would decompose into smaller NC or complex species. The re-growth or combination of such smaller NC or complex species would lead to the formation of the final NC product, [Au12Ag32(SR)30−bClb]4− (b = 0–1).
More interestingly, [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− can also transform into [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− by the inter-cluster reaction with [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2−, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4c, by further introducing [Au44(SR)26]2− into [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− (x = 10–12; produced by the inter-cluster reaction of [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− at RAu44/Ag44 = 1/3) and changing the RAu44/Ag44 to 3:
1, the peaks assigned to [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− disappear in the mass spectra. Together with the disappearance of [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− is the increasing abundance of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, where the range of x is narrowed down from 18–29 to 19–23 (Fig. 4c, 2nd and 3rd spectra). In addition, due to the notable structural differences between [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, several Au/Ag-SR complexes were also observed in the ESI mass spectra of the final products. These Au/Ag-SR complexes are most probably produced by the decomposition of the parental [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2− NCs (Fig. S16†). It should be pointed out that such Au/Ag-SR complexes were not observed in the ESI mass spectrum produced by the direct reaction of [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4− at the same Au/Ag ratio (Fig. S16†), indicating that the reaction pathways of these two processes are different. Specifically, although both parental NCs ([AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2−, [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2−) will decompose during the inter-cluster reaction, those Au atoms in [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− might not totally participate in the production of [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, which will then produce a number of Au/Ag-SR complexes (Fig. S16†). In addition, [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− can be produced by the inter-cluster reaction between [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− and [Ag44(SR)30]4−. Specifically, as the number of Ag atoms in [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− increases, this species can be transformed into [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, whose ESI mass spectrum is almost identical to that of the NC species produced by the direct reaction of [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2− at the same RAu44/Ag44 (Fig. 4d, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th spectra). In addition, due to the similar structure between [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− and [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2−, no extensive Au/Ag-SR complexes were formed by the inter-cluster reaction (Fig. S17†).
In principle, the inter-conversion among [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4−, [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, and [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− suggests that [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− can react with [Au44(SR)26]2− to induce metal exchange while keeping the M–S framework of the parental NCs unchanged. In addition, three sets of products (i.e., [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4−, [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, and [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2−) with different Au/Ag ratios can also transform among each other by adding additional metal sources of [Ag44(SR)30]4− and [Au44(SR)26]2− (Fig. 5). Especially, the Ag-rich [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− NCs can react with [Au44(SR)26]2− to form [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3−, and a number of M–SR complexes will also be generated, because the Au atoms or Au-SR motifs in [AuxAg44−x(SR)30]4− might not participate in the alloying reaction. On the other hand, more Ag atom sources of [Ag44(SR)30]4− can be provided for [AuxAg44−x(SR)26]2− to drive their conversion to those evenly mixed [AuxAg44−x(SR)27]3− NCs.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d1sc06296d |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022 |