Open Access Article
Camilla
Loro
ab,
Julie
Oble
b,
Francesca
Foschi
a,
Marta
Papis
a,
Egle M.
Beccalli
c,
Sabrina
Giofrè
c,
Giovanni
Poli
*b and
Gianluigi
Broggini
*a
aDipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, via Valleggio 9, 22100 Como, Italy. E-mail: gianluigi.broggini@uninsubria.it
bSorbonne Université, Faculté des Sciences et Ingénierie, CNRS, Institut Parisien de Chimie Moléculaire, IPCM, 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: giovanni.poli@sorbonne-universite.fr
cDISFARM, Sezione di Chimica Generale e Organica “A. Marchesini”, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Venezian 21, 20133 Milano, Italy
First published on 8th February 2022
Treatment of O-allyl N-tosyl carbamates with aromatic compounds in the presence of Cu(OTf)2 or TMSOTf as promoters affords N-substituted 1-arylpropan-2-amines, 1,2-diarylpropanes, 1,1-diarylpropanes, or indanes, depending on the nature of the promoter and of the aryl substrates. A full mechanistic rational allowing appreciation of the outcome of these novel C–H based cascades is proposed. An initial acid promoted decarboxylative/deamidative Friedel–Crafts allylation takes place. After protonation of the allylated arene, evolution of the resulting cation may follow different paths depending on the nature of the arene partner and of the allyl moiety in the carbamate.
In the frame of our long-term study dedicated to carbamates as precursors for metal-catalysed cyclisations,4 we investigated in particular the behaviour of O-allyl N-tosyl carbamates. These compounds have been shown to undergo exo-5 or endo-trig6 cyclisations involving further functionalisation of the carbon double bond. Moreover, allyl carbamates can also allow decarboxylative O → N allylic rearrangement affording selectively anti-Markovnikov hydroamination products.7 In this work, we show that O-allyl carbamates behave as C3 1,2-, 1,1-, and 1,3-dication equivalents, allowing the generation of 1-arylpropan-2-amines, 1,2- and 1,1-diarylpropanes, as well as indane structures, in the presence of Cu(OTf)2 or TMSOTf as acid-promoters (Scheme 1).
![]() | ||
| Scheme 1 Different reactivities in the acid promoted coupling between arenes and O-allyl N-tosyl carbamates observed in the present study (bold bonds refer to forming bonds). | ||
| Entry | Promoter (equiv.) | Temp. (°C) | Time (h) | Product(s) (% yield)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 equiv.), mesitylene (0.25 M), oil bath as heat source. b Isolated yields. c Chlorobenzene/H2O as solvent (96/4 v/v) (0.4 M) with mesitylene (5.0 equiv.). d MW irradiation at 300 W. e Chlorobenzene as the solvent (0.25 M) with mesitylene (5.0 equiv.). f DMF as the solvent (0.25 M) with mesitylene (5.0 equiv.). g DCE (0.25 M) with mesitylene (5.0 equiv.). | ||||
| 1 | Cu(OTf)2 (1.0) | 100 | 6.0 | 2 (36) + 4 (43) |
| 2 | Cu(OTf)2 (1.0) | 50 | 24 | S.M. |
| 3 | Cu(OTf)2 (0.1) | 100 | 24 | S.M. |
| 4 | Cu(OTf)2 (4.0) | 130 | 3.0 | 2 (85) + 4 (11) |
| 5 | Cu(OTf)2 (4.0)c | 130 | 4.0 | 2 (77) + 4 (22) |
| 6 | PTSA (4.0) | 130 d | 1.5 | 2 (59) + 4 (18) |
| 7 | H2SO4 (1.0) | 130 | 4.0 | 2 (25) + 4 (14) |
| 8 | AgOTf (4.0) | 130 | 1.5 | 2 (25) + 4 (31) |
| 9 | TfOH (0.05) | 130 | 4.0 | 2 (69) + 4 (26) |
| 10 | TfOH (0.05)e | 130 | 4.0 | 2 (58) + 4 (41) |
| 11 | TfOH (0.05)f | 130 | 4.0 | degr. products |
| 12 | BF3·Et2O (1.0) | 100 d | 0.5 | 2 (21) + 3 (63) |
| 13 | BF3·Et2O (4.0) | 130d | 1.5 | 2 (15) + 3 (72) |
| 14 | TMSOTf (0.05) | 130 | 3.0 | 2 (23) + 4 (41) |
| 15 | TMSOTf (4.0) | 130 | 3.0 | 3 (89) |
| 16 | TMSOTf (4.0)g | 80 | 4.0 | 3 (79) |
Different promoters were then tested, using either conventional heating or microwave irradiation. However, p-toluenesulfonic acid, H2SO4 and silver(I) triflate behaved analogously to Cu(OTf)2 (Table 1, entries 6–8). Assuming that the above described reaction conditions involved the in situ generation of TfOH, we also tested a catalytic amount of this acid in different solvents (entries 9–11). Working in mesitylene or in chlorobenzene with 5.0 equivalents of mesitylene, the recovery of TsNH2 was still high, whereas the use of DMF gave only intractable degradation products. The use of F3B·OEt2 disclosed a new reactivity involving the double arylation to the allyl moiety. Indeed, treatment of 1a with a stoichiometric or an excess amount of F3B·OEt2 under microwave irradiation furnished a mixture of 2 and the 1,2-diarylpropane 3 (entries 12 and 13). Switch to TMSOTf as the acid promoter was then considered. While the use of a catalytic amount of this promoter afforded a mixture of 2 and 4 (entry 14), an excess amount of it (4.0 equiv.) gladly brought about the selective formation of 3 in 89% yield (entry 15). A similar result was also obtained using DCE as solvent (entry 16).
Among the range of branched amines, N-substituted phenethylamine derivatives have been widely studied in recent years for their value in organic, bioorganic, and medicinal chemistry.8 We thus set out to test the decarboxylative arylation/hydroamination described above with other aromatic hydrocarbons (Table 2).
| Entry | Aryl hydrocarbon | Product(s) (% yield)b |
|---|---|---|
| a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 equiv.), Cu(OTf)2 (4.0 equiv.), aryl hydrocarbon (5.0 equiv.), chlorobenzene/H2O as solvent (96/4 v/v) (0.4 M), 130 °C, 4 h. b Isolated yields. Isomeric ratios calculated from the 1H-NMR of the crude reaction mixture. c Scale up: performing the reaction with 5 mmol of 1a at 130 °C, after 6 h 5 was obtained in 71% yield. | ||
| 1c | p-Xylene |
|
| 2 | o-Xylene |
|
| 3 | m-Xylene |
|
| 4 | Toluene |
|
| 5 | Benzene |
|
| 6 | 1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene |
|
| 7 | 1,3,5-Triethylbenzene |
|
Accordingly, reacting allyl carbamate 1a in p-xylene under the conditions of Table 1, entry 5 [Cu(OTf)2 (4 equiv.), chlorobenzene9/H2O (96/4 v/v), 130 °C, 4.0 h] afforded the corresponding arylated 2-tosylaminopropane 5 as the sole product in good yield (Table 2, entry 1). The reaction carried out in o-xylene, m-xylene, or toluene gave the corresponding arylation/hydroamination products as mixtures of two regioisomers 6a/6b, 7a/7b, and 8a/8b (entries 2–4). The less electron-rich benzene also provided the expected arylation/hydroamination product 910 in acceptable yield (entry 5). Finally, the heavily alkylated arenes durene and 1,3,5-triethylbenzene gave the corresponding cascade products 10 and 11 in good yields (entries 6 and 7).
We propose for the above double coupling reactions the following mechanism, shown in the case of carbamate 1a (Scheme 2). First, we assume that triflic acid is formed in situ from Cu(OTf)2 (or TMSOTf) and water.11 Following protonation at the carbonyl oxygen atom of the carbamate function generates the activated O-allyl carbamate I, which undergoes a decarboxylative/deamidative FC alkylation by attack of arene to give intermediate III passing through an allyl carbenium ion II. Subsequent Markovnikov protonation of III generates the allyl carbenium ion IV. At this point, the nature of the additive directs the reaction path. In the presence of copper triflate, the extruded N-tosylamide can coordinate the metal, generating the amido copper-complex V, which selectively attacks the carbenium ion IV, affording the hydroamination product 2.12 Alternatively, when TMSOTf is used, intermediate IV undergoes a second FC allylation, providing the 1,2-diarylpropane 3. Finally, in the presence of excess triflic acid product 2 suffers a deamidative substitution by mesitylene via an incipient or discrete carbenium ion, to afford the diarylated product 3.
![]() | ||
| Scheme 2 Proposed mechanisms for the acid-mediated decarboxylative C–H coupling between arenes and O-allyl carbamates. | ||
Corollary experiments using the O-allyl N-4-chlorophenyl carbamate 1b in place of 1a were carried out next (Scheme 3). Running the reaction in mesitylene/H2O (98/2 v/v) in the presence of Cu(OTf)2 as the promoter gave the diarylated product 3, and not the corresponding aniline derivative. However, carrying out the same reaction in the presence of exogenous H2NTs (2.0 equiv.) afforded a mixture of the arylated/hydroaminated derivative 2 and the diarylated derivative 3. These results corroborate the above proposed mechanism and show that tosylamine is a competent nitrogen nucleophile to trap the carbenium ion IV when Cu(OTf)2 is used as the promoter.
![]() | ||
| Scheme 3 Cu(OTf)2/H2O mediated decarboxylative C–H couplings between mesitylene and O-allyl N-4-chlorophenyl carbamate. Reaction condition involves the use of 100 μL of H2O for 1 mmol of 1b. | ||
The scope of the reaction was evaluated next, keeping the promoting system Cu(OTf)2/H2O in chlorobenzene (Table 3). On the one hand, reacting O-allyl N-2-nosylcarbamate 1c with 5 equiv. of mesitylene (entry 1), and carbamate 1a with mesityl bromide (entry 2), 4-methylanisole (entry 3), 4-bromoanisole (entry 4) gave the corresponding hydroaminated products 12–15 in fair to good yields. On the other hand, strongly activated arenes such as 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene gave the diarylated product 16 as the only product (entry 5).
| Entry | Arene | PG | Product(s) (% yield)b |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Reaction conditions: N-protected O-allyl carbamate (1.0 equiv.), Cu(OTf)2 (4.0 equiv.), arene (5.0 equiv.), chlorobenzene/H2O as solvent (96/4 v/v) (0.4 M), 130 °C, 4 h. b Isolated yields. c The reaction was carried out in mesitylene as solvent (0.25 M). | |||
| 1c | Mesitylene | o-Ns |
|
| 2 | Mesitylbromide | Ts |
|
| 3 | 4-Methylanisole | Ts |
|
| 4 | 4-Bromoanisole | Ts |
|
| 5 | 1,3,5-Trimethoxybenzene | Ts |
|
To have a better knowledge of the behaviour of this C–H cascade as a function of the adopted reaction protocol and the nature of the engaged reaction partners, other tests were undertaken. Accordingly, the C–H coupling between variously substituted N-tosyl carbamates in the presence of the Cu(OTf)2/H2O system and 5.0 equivalents of arene was next tested (Scheme 4). In the event, each isomeric carbamate 1d–f converged toward the same corresponding arylation/hydroamination product, namely 17 when reacted with mesitylene and 18 when reacted with p-xylene.
Such a reactivity suggests the convergence of 1d, 1e and 1f toward the common allylic carbenium ion VI, which, after the FC reaction, undergoes a regioselective Cu-promoted hydroamination (Scheme 5).
The coupling of N-tosyl carbamates 1a, and 1d–e was also tested using TMSOTf as acid promoter in DCE at 80 °C (Table 4). In this case, reaction of 1a with p-xylene gave an inseparable mixture made of the 1,2-diarylated product 19, the 1,1-diarylated product 20, and indane 21 (entry 1). Carbamates 1d and 1e converged again toward a mixture of the 1,1-diarylated product 22 and the indane 23 when reacted with p-xylene (entry 2), and toward a mixture of the 1,2-diarylated product 24 and 1,3-diarylated product 25 when reacted with mesitylene (entry 3).
| Entryd | 1 | Arene | Product(s) (% yield)b |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 equiv.), TMSOTf (4.0 equiv.), arene (5.0 equiv.), DCE (0.4 M), 80 °C, 4 h. b Isolated yields. Isomeric ratios calculated from the 1H-NMR of the crude reaction mixture. c 19 + 20 isomeric ratio: 1/1. d The relative configuration of indane structures 21 and 23 was determined by NOESY experiment. | |||
| 1c | 1a | p-Xylene |
|
| 2 | 1d, 1e | p-Xylene |
|
| 3 | 1d, 1e | Mesitylene |
|
The reactivity observed with the above experiments deserves further remarks. First, the formation of 19, 20, and 21 (Table 4, entry 1) can be rationalized as follows (Scheme 6, top part). After the first FC allylation of p-xylene, Markovnikov protonation and interception of the resulting carbenium ion VII by a second molecule of p-xylene generates 19. However, p-xylene – less nucleophilic than mesitylene – allows a competitive VII-to-VIII 1,2-hydride shift that takes place before the second FC reaction, generating 20. At this point, the benzylic carbocation VIII and the styrene IX could react together through a formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition giving the Wheland intermediate X which can evolve into 21.13
![]() | ||
| Scheme 6 Proposed mechanisms associated to the reactions of Table 5. Top part: entry 1, from 1a to 19, 20, and 21. Bottom part: entry 3, from 1d or 1e to 24 and 25. | ||
The outcome of entry 3 in Table 4 needs further observations, too. Indeed, in this case, the protonation after the first FC reaction is non-regioselective, and the very nucleophilic mesitylene intercepts the two resulting carbenium ions to give a mixture of 24 and 25. In this case, the very reactive arene does not let the time for a homobenzylic-to-benzylic cation 1,2-hydride shift (Scheme 6, bottom part).
The α,α-dimethyl substituted O-allyl N-tosyl carbamate 1g was investigated next (Table 5). Thus, treatment of this carbamate with durene under the usual TMSOTf conditions gave indane 26 in 87% yield (entry 1). Analogous treatment with mesitylene afforded an inseparable mixture of the two isomeric indanes 27a and 27b in 89% yield (entry 2), while reaction with p-xylene gave an inseparable 1
:
1 mixture of the indane 28 and the hydrindacene 29 in 93% yield (entry 3).
| Entry | Arene | Product(s) (% yield)b |
|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 equiv.), TMSOTf (4.0 equiv.), arene (5.0 equiv.), DCE (0.4 M), 80 °C, 4 h.
b Isolated yields. Isomeric ratios calculated from the 1H-NMR of the crude reaction mixture.
c 1 : 1 isomeric ratio.
d
28 + 29 in 1 : 1 ratio.
|
||
| 1 | Durene |
|
| 2c | Mesitylene |
|
| 3d | p-Xylene |
|
Here, in contrast to the previous cases, a one-to-one coupling between the carbamate and the arene takes place, generating indane structures. This is likely due to the fact that after the first FC allylation on the less substituted allyl terminus XI,14 the aromatic ring is favourably biased to undergo a second, intramolecular, FC reaction. It should be noted that in the cases of mesitylene and durene, 1,2-methyl migrations on the aryl moiety15 take place – before or after the first FC reaction – opening the way to the final intramolecular FC reaction (Scheme 7). However, a second carbocation species could attack the highly reactive indane 28 providing the hydrindacene 29.16
![]() | ||
| Scheme 7 Proposed mechanisms for the generation of the indane structures 26, 27a and 27b and of hydrindacene 29 from carbamate 1g. | ||
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d2qo00114d |
| This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2022 |