Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: CO2 conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge plasma: N2 in the mix as a helping hand or problematic impurity?

R. Snoeckx *a, S. Heijkers a, K. Van Wesenbeeck b, S. Lenaerts b and A. Bogaerts a
aResearch Group PLASMANT, Department of Chemistry, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, BE-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. E-mail: ramses.snoeckx@uantwerpen.be
bResearch Group DuEL, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Received 12th January 2022 , Accepted 12th January 2022

First published on 26th January 2022


Abstract

Correction for ‘CO2 conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge plasma: N2 in the mix as a helping hand or problematic impurity?’ by R. Snoeckx et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, 999–1011, DOI: 10.1039/C5EE03304G.


The use of the reported low-pressure limit rate constants for the reactions NO2 + NO3 + M → N2O5 + M and N2O5 + M → NO2 + NO3 + M (see Section 2.2 of the Supplementary Information) results in a significant overestimation of the rate constants at 1 atm. Therefore, we advise to use the high-pressure limit rate expressions:
NO2 + NO3 → N2O5, 1.9 × 10−12(Tgas/300)0.2 cm3 s−1 Ref. 1
instead of:
NO2 + NO3 + M → N2O5 + M, 3.6 × 10−30(300/Tgas)4.1 cm6 s−1
and
N2O5 → NO2 + NO3, 9.7 × 1014(Tgas/300)0.1[thin space (1/6-em)]exp(−11[thin space (1/6-em)]080/Tgas) cm3 s−1 Ref. 1
instead of:
N2O5 + M → NO2 + NO3 + M, 1.3 × 10−3(Tgas/300)−3.5[thin space (1/6-em)]exp(−11[thin space (1/6-em)]000/Tgas) cm6 s−1
Note that these revised reactions are written as: A + B → AB, but in reality, these are also three-body reactions, hence: A + B (+M) → AB (+M). However, the unit for the high-pressure limit corresponds to that of a two-body reaction (cm3 s−1). M is therefore left out of the reaction, to avoid confusion with the unit of the rate constant.

However, the third body is needed, also at high pressure, for conservation of energy and momentum, but the number density of M is no limiting factor, because at high pressure there are sufficient collisions with M. At low pressure, on the other hand, the number density of M will be a limiting factor, and must therefore be accounted for in the reaction rate; hence the need to write it as a three-body reaction.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

References

  1. R. Atkinson, D. L. Baulch, R. A. Cox, J. N. Crowley, R. F. Hampson, R. G. Hynes, M. E. Jenkin, M. J. Rossi and J. Troe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2004, 4, 1461–1738 CrossRef CAS.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.