R.
Snoeckx
*a,
S.
Heijkers
a,
K.
Van Wesenbeeck
b,
S.
Lenaerts
b and
A.
Bogaerts
a
aResearch Group PLASMANT, Department of Chemistry, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, BE-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. E-mail: ramses.snoeckx@uantwerpen.be
bResearch Group DuEL, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
First published on 26th January 2022
Correction for ‘CO2 conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge plasma: N2 in the mix as a helping hand or problematic impurity?’ by R. Snoeckx et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, 999–1011, DOI: 10.1039/C5EE03304G.
NO2 + NO3 → N2O5, 1.9 × 10−12(Tgas/300)0.2 cm3 s−1 Ref. 1 |
NO2 + NO3 + M → N2O5 + M, 3.6 × 10−30(300/Tgas)4.1 cm6 s−1 |
N2O5 → NO2 + NO3, 9.7 × 1014(Tgas/300)0.1![]() ![]() |
N2O5 + M → NO2 + NO3 + M, 1.3 × 10−3(Tgas/300)−3.5![]() ![]() |
However, the third body is needed, also at high pressure, for conservation of energy and momentum, but the number density of M is no limiting factor, because at high pressure there are sufficient collisions with M. At low pressure, on the other hand, the number density of M will be a limiting factor, and must therefore be accounted for in the reaction rate; hence the need to write it as a three-body reaction.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022 |