Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Mixed-metal calix[8]arene complexes: structure, and ring opening polymerisation studies

Tian Xing a, Max Derbyshire b, Mark R. J. Elsegood b and Carl Redshaw *a
aPlastics Collaboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. E-mail: c.redshaw@hull.ac.uk
bChemistry Department, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK

Received 19th April 2022 , Accepted 8th June 2022

First published on 8th June 2022


Abstract

Reactions of différent combinations of group V alkoxides or tungsten oxyalkoxide salts with p-tert-butylcalix[8]areneH8 (L8H8) affords mixed-metal calix[8]arene systems. Intruiging molecular structures are formed and the systems are capable of the ring opening polymerisation of ε-caprolactone under N2, air, or as melts affording mostly low molecular weight products.


The use of calix[n]arenes as ancillary ligands in metal-based catalysis continues to attract interest, driven in part by the facile functionalisation of calixarenes as well as the tendency of such systems to form highly crystalline products.1 In the case of the larger calix[n]arenes (n ≥ 6), there is the increased possibility of simultaneously coordinating multiple metal centres.2 Over the last decade or so, a number of metallocalix[n]arenes have been shown to be useful catalysts for the ring opening polymerisation (ROP) of cyclic esters.3 Such a ROP process has become topical given the need to find alternatives to petroleum-derived plastics.4 In ROP, the use of heterometallic catalysts is an emerging area,5 whilst the use of polymetallic systems has also been deemed favourable.6 The driving force in such studies is the possibility that cooperativity between metal centres can lead to enhanced catalytic performance versus homometallic or mono-metallic counterparts.7 In our previous work, we have reported vanadium-containing calixarenes, and have been able to structurally characterise examples containing one, two, three, or four vanadyl centres bound to a calix[8]arene.8 Our entry into such systems is typically via the use of alkoxides of the form [V(O)(OR)3] (R = Et, nPr), which react with the parent calixarene with loss of alcohol (ROH). Herein, we have extended our investigations to the synthesis of mixed-metal calix[8]arene systems, containing either different group V metals or combinations of group V and VI metals, formed via the use of alkoxide precursors. The potential of such systems to act as catalysts for the ROP of ε-caprolactone has been investigated. We note that mixed-metal calixarene complexes are limited to Fe2Ln2p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene clusters (Ln = lanthanide)9a and MNi4 (M = Mn, Co, Cu) p-tert-butylthiacalix[6]arene clusters.9b

Our entry point into this chemistry are the commercially available reagents [M(OEt)5] (M = Nb, Ta), [VO(OR)3] (R = iPr, nPr), [MoO(OiPr)4] and the in situ generated Li[WO(OtBu)5]. Treatment of L8H8 with one equivalent each of [VO(OiPr)3] and [Nb(OEt)5] afforded, following work-up, the complex [{Nb(OiPr)(NCMe)}2(μ-O)3(VO)2(L8)]·8MeCN (1·8MeCN) in moderate yield; the molecular structure of 1·8MeCN is shown in Fig. 1 (for packing see Fig. S1, ESI). In the IR spectrum, v(CN) for the coordinated/free acetonitrile are observed at 2289/2251 cm−1, whilst the strong band at 1013 cm−1 is assigned to vV[double bond, length as m-dash]O; bands in the region 800–600 cm−1 are assigned to vNb–O–Nb and vNb–O–V. The formula given is the asymmetric unit. The two octahedral niobium(V) centres are bridged by a near symmetric, slightly bent [Nb(1)–O(11)–Nb(2) = 162.73(14)°] oxo bridge. Each niobium centre is bound by an isopropoxide ligand, an MeCN and cis bonds to two calixarene phenolate oxygens, whilst the two tetrahedral vanadium centres bridge to one Nb each via an oxo bridging ligand. Each V5+ has a second, terminal, oxo ligand, and this vanadyl bond length at 1.603(2) Å is in the range [1.593(2)–1.695(4) Å] typically observed for this function.8 The two VO2+ moieties are both ‘above’ the Nb–O–Nb unit in the heart of the complex.


image file: d2cc02236b-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of [{Nb(OiPr)(NCMe)}2(μ-O)3(VO)2(L8)]·8MeCN (1·8MeCN).

This type of structural motif seems quite general, given that similar use of [Ta(OEt)5] also led to an isostructural complex, namely {[Ta(OiPr)(NCMe)]2(μ-O)3(VO)2(L8)}·6.5MeCN (2·6.5MeCN), differing only in the number of MeCNs of crystallisation (Fig. S2, ESI). In the IR spectrum of 2·6.5MeCN, a band at 1012 cm−1 is assigned to vV[double bond, length as m-dash]O.

Surprisingly, replacing [VO(OiPr)3] with [VO(OnPr)3] led, following work-up, to the isolation of the complex [Nb2(VO)2{VO(OnPr)}{V(NCMe)2}(μ2-OnPr)23-O)(μ2-O)2(L8)]·7MeCN (3·7MeCN), see Fig. 2 and Fig. S3 (ESI). In the IR spectrum, the strong band at 1021 cm−1 is assigned to vV[double bond, length as m-dash]O. Whilst the metal centres V(1) and V(2) do not coordinate to the calix[8]arene, the other four metal centres each coordinate to two adjacent calix[8]arene phenolates. The V(1) centre adopts a distorted octahedral geometry where the coordination sphere is completed by two acetonitrile ligands. The V(2) centre is distorted trigonal bipyramidal, as confirmed by the Reedijk criteria (τ = 0.06),10 and is bound by all three of the n-propoxide ligands; two of the latter form bridges to the two octahedral niobium centres. It is noteworthy that whilst three of the vanadium centres are of the vanadyl [V[double bond, length as m-dash]O] type, V(3) is not.


image file: d2cc02236b-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of [Nb2(VO)2{VO(OnPr)}{V(NCMe)2}(μ2-OnPr)23-O)(μ2-O)2(L8)]·7MeCN (3·7MeCN).

The vanadyl bond lengths [1.566(3)–1.588(3) Å] are comparable with those observed in 1·8MeCN [1.589(3) and 1.603(2) Å] and 2 [1.583(8) and 1.603(7) Å]. The geometry at both V(3) and V(4) is tetrahedral, with each metal lying above/below the approximate plane formed by the other four metal centres. Within the core, a 6-membered triangle is formed involving Nb(1), Nb(2), V(1) and three oxo bridges. A second triangle is formed by V(1), V(3), Nb(1) and three μ2-oxo bridges. Moreover, two diamond motifs are generated by the ligation between V(2), two bridging n-propoxides, a μ3-oxo and the niobium centres. Platon suggests that the V(1) centre is the 4+ centre.11

In an attempt to extend this chemistry to mixed group V/VI systems, [M(OR)5] (M = Nb, Ta) was reacted with L8H8 in the presence of [WO(OtBu)4]. However, the crystals isolated consistently suffered from severe disorder making structure elucidation problematic. Given this, it was decided to employ a salt complex of the form Li[WO(OtBu)5] as the entry point, which was generated in situ via interaction of [WO(OtBu)4] with LiOtBu, akin to the method of Wilkinson et al.12 for other metal salts.

Interaction of Li[WO(OtBu)5], [Nb(OR)5], and L8H8 led, after work-up (MeCN), to the isolation of orange/red crystals of [{WO(NCMe)}22-O)2Nb(NCMe)(μ2-O)Li(NCMe)(L8)]·4MeCN (4·4MeCN), see Fig. 3 and Fig. S4 (ESI). In the IR spectrum, a band at 915 cm−1 is assigned to vW[double bond, length as m-dash]O, whilst bands at 2318/2294 cm−1 are assigned to the metal-bound acetonitrile ligands. The two octahedral W(VI) centres have three (mer) bonds, a terminal oxo group, a near linear oxo bridge (to Nb) and an acetonitrile ligand. The W[double bond, length as m-dash]O bond lengths [1.691(4) and 1.710(3) Å] are in good agreement with others observed in tungstocalixarenes.13 The Nb(V) centre is also octahedral but with two cis bonds to the calixarene, three fac bonds to bridging oxo groups (two to W, one to Li) and an acetonitrile ligand. The Nb–N bond lengths [2.416(4) and 2.449(4) Å] are slightly longer than those observed in a number of reported niobium aryloxide acetonitrile species [2.220(13)–2.321(2) Å].14 The tetrahedral Li centre bonds to two calixarene oxygens, the oxo bridge to niobium, and an acetonitrile ligand.


image file: d2cc02236b-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Molecular structure of one of two similar molecules in the asymmetric unit of [{WO(NCMe)}22-O)2Nb(NCMe)(μ2-O)Li(NCMe)(L8)]·4MeCN (4·4MeCN); solvent of crystallization omitted for clarity.

Given the presence of oxo bridges in 4·4MeCN, the reaction was repeated using L8H8 that had been subject to prolonged drying (48 h at 100 °C under vacuo). Following work-up (MeCN), small red prisms were isolated. In the IR spectrum, a band at 921 cm−1 is assigned to vW[double bond, length as m-dash]O, whilst bands in the region 820–600 cm−1 are assigned to vW–O–W and vNb–O–W. A single crystal X-ray diffraction study revealed the product to be [Li(NCMe)2{WO(OtBu)}{WO(OEt)a(OtBu)b}{NbO(OEt)c(OtBu)d}L8]·3(MeCN) (5·3MeCN), Fig. 4 and Fig. S5 (ESI). Again, the presence of two octahedral W(VI) centres and a Nb(V) centre is clear and these are bridged by three oxo ions O(9), O(10), and O(11). The oxygen bridging the two tungsten centres is also coordinated to a lithium centre. The W[double bond, length as m-dash]O bond lengths 1.775(3) and 1.765(3) Å are slightly longer than those observed in 4·4MeCN, but are still in good agreement with others observed elsewhere.13 Interestingly, the structure is stabilised via eight weak hydrogen bonding interactions between CH2 groups of the calix[8]arene ligand and respective metal coordinative phenolate oxygen atoms, see ESI. The three transition metals form a triangle, and the lithium ion is in the same plane, whilst the calix[8]arene adopts a saddleback conformation; alkoxide ligands are in the two main cavities.


image file: d2cc02236b-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Molecular structure of [Li(NCMe)2{WO(OtBu)}{WO(OEt)a(OtBu)b}{NbO(OEt)c(OtBu)d}L8]·3MeCN (5·3MeCN); solvent of crystallization omitted for clarity.

Interaction of Li[WO(OtBu)5], [Ta(OEt)5] and L8H8 led, after work -up (MeCN), to the isolation of small orange/red crystals of [Li(NCMe)2{W(OEt)}2Ta(OEt)2O3L8]·2(H2O) 6·2H2O, see Fig. 5 and Fig. S6 (ESI). It should be noted here that given W(VI) and Ta(V) have the same number of electrons, their positions in the formula are interchangeable. Despite this, the metal centres in the core form the type of triangle noted in 3·7MeCN with oxo bridges. In the same plane (a crystallographic mirror plane), there is a 5-coordinate Li+ ion. The two (symmetry equivalent) metal (W or Ta) centres are octahedral and coordinate to two oxo anions, three calixarene phenolate oxygens and an ethoxide. The Ta (or W) ion binds to two cis ethoxides, two trans calixarene phenolates and two cis oxo anions. The oxo ions O(7)/O(8) make long bonds to the Ta at ca. 2.12 Å (trans to ethoxide), but much shorter bonds to the two W ions at ca. 1.75 Å (trans to calixarene phenolate).


image file: d2cc02236b-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Molecular structure of [Li(NCMe)2{W(OEt)}2Ta(OEt)2O3L8]·2(H2O) (6·2H2O).

Attempts to form a mixed tantalum (or niobium)-molybdenum complex via [M(OEt)5] (M = Nb, Ta), [MoO(OiPr)4]15 and L8H8 led, after work-up, to the dimetallic complex [{(MoO(NCMe))}2L8]·5MeCN (7·5MeCN) as the only crystalline product in low isolated yield, see Fig. S7, ESI.

Complexes 1,2,5,6 have been screened for their potential to act catalysts for the ROP of ε-caprolactone. Despite the presence of alkoxide ligation in most of these precursors, we found that addition of benzyl alcohol (BnOH) can still be beneficial in terms of overall performance. Using 1, the ratio [CL][thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)][1][thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)][BnOH], time and temperature were all varied, see Table S2, ESI. At ambient temperature, in the presence of two equivalents of BnOH, and using a ratio of 800[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ([CL][thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)][1]), the conversion was high over 24 h, but the products formed were of low molecular weight. Increasing the temperature to 100 °C led to an increased molecular weight, which further increased on raising the temperature to 130 °C, but led to a less controlled process. In the absence of BnOH, the performance of the system was similar. Complex 2 performed less well at 20 °C with only 30% conversion, whilst on raising the temperature to 130 °C, the conversion was near quantitative affording a product of lower molecular weight than 1 but with better control. In the absence of BnOH, high conversion is maintained whilst the PCL molecular weight is higher. For 3, conversions are high, with higher molecular weight observed in the presence of BnOH. The tungsten/niobium/lithium complex 5 affords only low molecular weight products at ambient temperature, with or without BnOH present. At 130 °C, the molecular weight is increased significantly only in the absence of BnOH. Similarly, the tungsten/tantalum/lithium complex 6 afforded only low molecular weight PCL at room temperature, whilst on elevating the temperature, there was little change. Kinetic studies (Fig. S8i, ESI), conducted using 800[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2 ([CL][thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)][Cat][thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)][BnOH]) revealed the rate trend 6 > 2 > 5 > 1. For comparative purposes, the homo-dinuclear complexes [(MCl2)L8H2] (M = Nb I, Ta II) have also been screened herein under similar conditions.14b Results reveal that, as for the mixed-metal systems 1, the Nb system I exhibits higher conversion at ambient temperature than does Ta system II, with all affording low molecular weight products (Mn ≤ 910). At 130 °C, the Ta system afforded higher conversion, however the Mn value observed for II was twice that for I, whereas that obtained using 1 was three times greater than that for 2, albeit with worse control. On comparing I with 1 at 130 °C, it can be said that better conversion is achieved with the mixed-metal system and a higher molecular product afforded, but with less control. For 2, conversion is slightly greater than II, whilst the latter affords a higher molecular weight product, but with less control.

1H NMR spectra of PCL formed in the presence of BnOH indicated the presence of a BnO end group (e.g. Fig. S9, ESI). However, from MALDI-ToF mass spectra (Fig. S10 and S11, ESI), it was evident that several PCL series were present (as sodium adducts). For 1, these included (in increasing mass order) a series with BnO–/–H (with n – 1 degree of polymerisation), a series with no end groups (cyclic), HO–/–H (and a −2Da offset series overlapping), CH3O–/–H and iPrO–/–H. Similarly, for 2, four PCL series can be identified which include a series with no end groups, HO–/–H and the sodium exchange artefact, and BnO–/–H end groups. Some of these families were evident in 1H NMR spectra for runs in the absence of BnOH (e.g. Fig. S12, ESI).

Interestingly, in the absence of BnOH, kinetics revealed (Fig. S8ii, ESI) the activity order 5162 with the Nb/W/Li system outperforming the other three under the conditions employed herein. The reason for this differing trend is as yet unknown, but we tentatively suggest that the presence of the tert-butoxide is beneficial. The complexes were examined for their ROP potential under solvent-free conditions (Table S3, ESI). Results for 1 were similar with or without BnOH, whilst for 2, use of BnOH led to a higher molecular weight product albeit with less control. The performance of 5 was poor in the presence of BnOH, but improved in the absence of BnOH with a 10-fold increase in conversion and an approximate 4-fold increase in product molecular weight. The situation using 6 was somewhat different with a slightly improved conversion in the presence of BnOH, together with an increased molecular weight. Again, 1H NMR spectra of the PCL formed in the presence of BnOH indicated the presence of a BnO end group (Fig. S13, ESI).

Finally, the complexes were evaluated for ROP of ε-CL under air (Table S4, ESI). In general, higher conversions were achieved in the absence of BnOH, with 1 affording highest conversion. With the exception of 1, molecular weights of the products obtained under air, in the presence of BnOH, were comparable with those afforded under N2; that for 1 was somewhat lower. In the absence of BnOH, molecular weights were generally higher than those observed under N2. The MALDI-ToF mass spectra (Fig. S14–S16, ESI), for 1, show a low mass series with no end groups (not shown), plus a series with HO–/–H and the sodium exchange artefact where the carboxylic proton has exchanged for Na. For 2, at least four series of peaks were identified including the sodium exchange artefact for the BnO–/–H end group (e.g. m/z 1407.8), overlapping (−2 Da offset) with the HO–/–H series, together with a number of lower intensity families. In the absence of BnOH, 2 affords similar species to that formed with BnOH except for the BnO–/–H series. There is also a +4Da offset from the no end group series (e.g. m/z 1395.8).

In conclusion, we have isolated and structurally characterised a number of rare examples of mixed-metal calix[n]arenes using group V and VI alkoxides as entry points. A number of unusual structures have been identified. The products are capable of the efficient ROP of ε-CL, affording mixtures of low molecular weight products with differing or no end groups.

We thank the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for a PhD Scholarship with TX. CR thanks the EPSRC (EP/S025537/1) for financial support. We thank the EPSRC National Crystallography Service, Southampton for data collection and Wyatt Analytical for data.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. (a) D. H. Homden and C. Redshaw, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 5086–5130 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) O. Santoro and C. Redshaw, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2021, 448, 214173 CrossRef CAS.
  2. C. Redshaw, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2003, 244, 45–70 CrossRef CAS.
  3. (a) M. Frediani, D. Sémeril, A. Marrioti, L. Rosi, P. Frediani, L. Rosi, D. Matt and L. Toupet, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2008, 29, 1554–1560 CrossRef CAS; (b) M. Frediani, D. Sémeril, D. Matt, L. Rosi, P. Frediani, F. Rizzolo and A. M. Papini, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2010, 490724, 6 Search PubMed.
  4. For reviews, see (a) B. J. O’Keefe, M. A. Hillmeyer and W. B. Tolman, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2001, 2215–2224 RSC; (b) O. Dechy-Cabaret, B. Martin-Vaca and D. Bourissou, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 6147–6176 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) M. Labet and W. Thielemans, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 3484–3504 RSC; (d) C. M. Thomas, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 165–173 RSC; (e) A. Arbaoui and C. Redshaw, Polym. Chem., 2010, 1, 801–826 RSC; (f) Y. Sarazin and J.-F. Carpentier, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 3564–3614 CrossRef CAS PubMed and references therein.
  5. W. Gruszka and J. A. Garden, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 3252 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. (a) J. D. Ryan, K. J. Gagnon, S. J. Teat and R. D. McIntosh, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 9071–9073 RSC; (b) E. Fazekas and R. D. McIntosh, Organomet. Chem., 2021, 43, 63–82 CAS.
  7. M. Delferro and T. J. Marks, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 2450–2485 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. C. Redshaw, M. J. Walton, D. S. Lee, C. Jiang, M. R. J. Elsegood and K. Michiue, Chem. – Eur. J., 2015, 21, 5199–5210 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. (a) S. Sanz, K. Ferreira, R. D. McIntosh, S. J. Dalgarno and E. K. Brechin, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9042–9044 RSC; (b) T. Kajiwara, R. Shinagawa, T. Ito, N. Kon, N. Iki and S. Miyano, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 2003, 76, 2267–2275 CrossRef CAS.
  10. A. W. Addison, T. N. Rao, J. Reedijk, J. van Rijn and G. C. Verschoor, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1984, 1349–1356 RSC.
  11. A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr., 1990, A46, C34 Search PubMed.
  12. G. Wilkinson, G. B. Young, M. Bochmann, M. B. Hursthouse and K. M. A. Malik, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1980, 1863–1871 Search PubMed.
  13. C. Redshaw and M. R. J. Elsegood, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 2071–2074 CrossRef CAS.
  14. (a) T. Matsuo and H. Kawaguchi, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 6090–6098 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) C. Redshaw, M. Rowan, D. M. Homden, M. R. J. Elsegood, T. Yamato and C. Pérez-Casas, Chem. – Eur. J., 2007, 13, 10129–10139 CrossRef PubMed.
  15. M. H. Chisholm, K. Folting, J. C. Huffman and E. M. Kober, Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 241–245 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthetic details for 1–7; alternative views of 1–7; crystallographic and ROP data. CCDC 2156668–2156674. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cc02236b

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.