DOI:
10.1039/C5RA00724K
(Communication)
RSC Adv., 2015,
5, 27439-27442
Iodine-induced synthesis of sulfonate esters from sodium sulfinates and phenols under mild conditions†
Received
13th January 2015
, Accepted 12th March 2015
First published on 12th March 2015
Abstract
An iodine-induced synthesis of sulfonate esters via cross-coupling reactions of sodium sulfinates with phenols is reported. This synthetic route is low-cost, facile, green and efficient, and could afford the target products with good to excellent yields under mild conditions.
Sulfonate esters are well-known ester compounds and crucial pharmaceutical ingredients which work as bridge structures or ligands and have presented particular biological activities (such as antitumor and monoamine oxidase inhibitory activities) in medicinal chemistry (Fig. 1).1–4 Besides, sulfonate esters play a unique role in coupling reactions because sulfonate ester groups are removed easily.5 To date, many methods have been developed to synthesize sulfonate esters, mainly including the reaction of phenols with sulfonic acids,6 or with thiols using H2O2–POCl3 system,7 and with sulfonyl chlorides in ionic liquids,8 or under microwave-assistance9 and catalyzed by copper oxide.10 Other routes have been also reported.11 Nevertheless, most of these methods suffer from harsh reaction conditions. In addition, expensive and unstable sulfonyl chlorides as sulfonylating reagents would lead to some drawbacks. Hence, it is necessary to search for low-cost, green and efficient sulfonylating reagents (sulfonyl sources) for the synthesis of sulfonate esters.
 |
| Fig. 1 Selected examples for bioactive and pharmaceutical compounds containing sulfonate ester group. | |
In recent years, many chemists became interested in the direct sulfonylation reaction using various sulfonylation reagents.12 Among various sulfonylation reagents, sodium sulfinates seem to be more attractive due to their stability, low price and convenience handling. Actually, sodium sulfinates have been widely applied in sulfonylations,13 C–H arylations14 and sulfenylations.15 In addition, iodine-mediated synthesis has attracted more and more attention because iodine is cheap, readily available and eco-friendly.16 Recently, some interesting reactions related phenols in organic chemistry have been also reported.17
Based on our research interest in iodine-mediated reactions,18 herein we reported an iodine-induced the synthesis of sulfonate esters from sodium sulfinates and phenols under mild conditions. To our knowledge, such a route for the synthesis of sulfonate esters has not been reported to date.
To optimize the reaction conditions, the reaction of 4-chlorophenol (1a) with sodium p-toluenesulfinate (2a) was selected as the model reaction, and the results were shown in Table 1. When the reaction of 1a and 2a was carried out in the presence of I2 in CH3CN for 5 h, the yield of 4-chlorophenyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (3a) was only 10% (entry 1). Pinhey's investigations indicated that base additives could efficiently promote the coupling reaction of phenols with aryllead triacetates.19 Based on this idea, we suppose that base may act as the similar role in the present system. Thus, we examined the effect of various inorganic and organic bases on the coupling reaction of 4-chlorophenol with sodium p-toluenesulfinate. In the presence of CH3COONa, the yield of 3a was raised to 36% (entry 2). Very pleasedly, Cs2CO3, especially K2CO3, could dramatically improve the yield of 3a (entries 3 and 4). However, a strong inorganic base KOH and organic bases (Et3N and pyridine) gave unsatisfactory results (entries 5–7). The effect of solvents were further investigated. Compared with other solvents (H2O, DMF, EtOH and DMSO), CH3CN or CH3OH gave the better results (entries 8–12). Considering the toxicity of CH3CN, we chose CH3OH as the solvent for this transformation. When the temperature was elevated to 50 °C, the yield of 3a was not influenced (entry 13), so room temperature was found as the optimal temperature. In addition, the amount of I2 and K2CO3 has a great influence on the reaction (see ESI†). When 1 equiv. of I2 or K2CO3 was used in the present system, the best result could be obtained (entry 8). Moreover, when the reaction was performed on a 10.0 mmol scale (Table 1, entry 19), an excellent yield (88%) of 3a was obtained. This means that the reaction could be scalable and has a potential application for the preparation of more complex molecules.
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditionsa

|
Entry |
Base |
Solvent |
Time (h) |
Yieldb (%) |
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), I2 (1 equiv.), base (1 equiv.), solvent (2 mL) and room temperature. GC yield based on 1a. At 50 °C. Reaction in a dark background. Adding TEMPO. Adding BHT. Using tosyl iodide (0.6 mmol) instead of 2a and I2. Under N2 atmosphere. Reaction on a 10 mmol scale. |
1 |
No base |
CH3CN |
5 |
10 |
2 |
CH3COONa |
CH3CN |
5 |
36 |
3 |
Cs2CO3 |
CH3CN |
5 |
80 |
4 |
K2CO3 |
CH3CN |
5 |
98 |
5 |
KOH |
CH3CN |
5 |
19 |
6 |
Et3N |
CH3CN |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Pyridine |
CH3CN |
5 |
14 |
8 |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
98 |
9 |
K2CO3 |
H2O |
5 |
11 |
10 |
K2CO3 |
DMF |
5 |
57 |
11 |
K2CO3 |
EtOH |
5 |
75 |
12 |
K2CO3 |
DMSO |
5 |
69 |
13c |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
94 |
14d |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
89 |
15e |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
Trace |
16f |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
Trace |
17g |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
77 |
18h |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
90 |
19i |
K2CO3 |
CH3OH |
5 |
88 |
Under the optimized reaction conditions, the scope of synthesis of sulfonate esters by using various phenols with 2a was investigated (Table 2). A series of ortho and para-substituted phenols by electron-withdrawing groups (R = F, Br, I, NO2, CN) all proceeded smoothly to afford the corresponding products (3d–3f, 3i–3k) in excellent yields. However, when some electron-donating groups (R = CH3, isopropyl) substituted phenols were used, a long reaction time was needed, a lower yield was obtained, and some by-products substituted by iodine were observed (3c, 3g, 3h, 3l). This result may be attributed to the fact that the presence of electron-donating groups is not favourable for the conversion of phenols to aryloxy anion. In the present reaction system, the aryloxy anion may be one of key intermediates. To our delight, naphthol and quinolin-8-ol performed with good yields (3m–3o). Specially, aliphatic alcohols could react well with sodium p-toluenesulfinate (2a) in CH3CN solvent to afford the target products (3p–3r) with good yields when K2CO3 was replaced by CH3ONa. These results indicate that aliphatic alcohols are also suitable for this transformation in the presence of a strong base CH3ONa.
Table 2 Synthesis of sulfonate esters with various phenolsa,b

|
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), I2 (0.5 mmol), K2CO3 (1 equiv.), CH3OH (2 mL), room temperature. Isolated yield based on 1. CH3CN (2 mL) as the solvent. Using CH3ONa (0.5 mmol) instead of K2CO3. |
 |
On the other hand, the reactions of some sodium sulfinates with 1a were examined, and the result was summarized in Table 3. Various sodium sulfinates with 4-fluoro, 4-chloro, 4-bromo, 4-methoxyl and 4-ethyl groups substituted on aryl rings all proceeded smoothly to give good to excellent yields (3s–3x). In addition, 4-chlorophenylphenylmethane sulfonate (3y) was also obtained in a high yield.
Table 3 Scope of various sodium sulfonatesa,b
To investigate the reaction mechanism, several controlled experiments were performed (Table 1, entries 14–18). Firstly, when radical scavenger TEMPO or BHT was added to this reaction system (Table 1, entries 15 and 16), no desired 3a was obtained, indicating that the reaction involves a radical pathway. Besides, when the reaction of tosyl iodide instead of molecule iodine with 2a was carried out (Table 1, entry 17), 3a was still obtained in a high yield, revealing that tosyl iodide may be an intermediate in this transformation. Even if the reaction was proceeded in a dark background or under N2 atmosphere, the yield of 3a was almost unchanged (Table 1, entries 14 and 18). This means that visible light and oxygen were irrelevant for this transformation. As a result, a possible mechanism is proposed in Scheme 1. Sodium sulfinate firstly reacts with I2 to form sulfonyl iodide (A),20 which is easily subjected to homolysis to give a sulfonyl radical (E). At the same time, phenols is transformed to aryloxy anion (B) in alkaline medium. Then, the aryloxy anion B is combined with the radical E to generate the radical anion C, followed by the reaction with A to afford the desired sulfonate ester, together with radical anion D.21 The radical anion D could generate the radical E to enter into the next reaction cycle. In the present reaction system, molecular I2 practically is a reactant or an inducer, which is delineated in Scheme 2. The total reaction equation (Scheme 2) could explain well why the full conversion of 0.5 mmol of 1a to 3a requires 0.5 mmol of I2 (see ESI, Table S1,† entry 6).
 |
| Scheme 1 Proposed reaction mechanism. | |
 |
| Scheme 2 A total reaction equation for this transformation. | |
In conclusion, we have developed a simple, metal-free and eco-friendly synthesis of sulfonate esters from sodium sulfinates and phenols. Compared with the reported methods (such as using sulfonyl chlorides as starting materials), the present route appears to be more attractive and efficient for the synthesis of sulfonate esters. Further study on this reaction's application is ongoing currently in our laboratory.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21172079) and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2011B090400031) for financial support.
Notes and references
- P. J. Stang, Acc. Chem. Res., 1991, 24, 304 CrossRef CAS.
- D. P. Elder, E. Delaney, A. Teasdale, S. Eyley, V. D. Reif, K. Jacq, K. L. Facchine, R. S. Oestrich, P. Sandra and F. David, J. Pharm. Sci., 2010, 99, 2948 CAS.
-
(a) L. Pisani, M. Bareletta, R. Soto-Otero, O. Nicolotti, E. Mendez-Alvarez, M. Catto, A. Introcaso, A. Stefanachi, S. Cellamare, C. Altomare and A. Carotti, J. Med. Chem., 2013, 56, 2651 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) L. Yan and C. E. Müller, J. Med. Chem., 2004, 47, 1031 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) P. Wang, J. Min, J. C. Nwachukwu, V. Cavett, K. E. Carlson, P. Guo, M. Zhu, Y. Zheng, C. Dong, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, K. W. Nettles and H. Zhou, J. Med. Chem., 2012, 55, 2324 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) H. Zhou, J. S. Comninos, F. Stossi, B. S. Katzenellenbogen and J. A. Katzenellenbogen, J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48, 7261 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- P. J. Stang and W. L. Treptow, J. Med. Chem., 1981, 24, 468 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) P. Y. Yeung, C. M. So, C. P. Lau and F. Y. Kwong, Angew. Chem., 2010, 122, 9102 CrossRef;
(b) H. N. Nguyen, X. Huang and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11818 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) Z. Tang and Q. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 3058 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) L. J. Gooβen, N. Rodrígue, P. P. Lange and C. Linder, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1111 CrossRef PubMed;
(e) C. Cai, N. R. Rivera, J. Balsells, R. R. Sidler, J. C. McWilliams, C. S. Shultz and Y. Sun, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 5161 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(f) C. H. Cho, H. S. Yun and K. Park, J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 3017 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(g) S. C. Miller, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 4632 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) S. Caddick, J. D. Wilden and D. B. Judd, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1024 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) Y. Nitta and Y. Arakawa, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1985, 33, 1380 CrossRef CAS.
- K. Bahrami, M. M. Khodaei and J. Abbasi, Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 5095 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- G. Song, Y. Cai and Y. Peng, J. Comb. Chem., 2005, 7, 561 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) M. Oliverio, P. Costanzo, R. Paonessa, M. Nardi and A. Procopio, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 2548 RSC;
(b) S. Lakrout, H. K'tir, A. Amira, M. Berredjem and N. Aouf, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 16027 RSC;
(c) N. Zhao, Y. Li, Y. Wang and J. Wang, J. Sulfur Chem., 2006, 27, 427 CrossRef CAS;
(d) L. Xu and C. Xia, Synth. Commun., 2004, 34, 1199 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- G. A. Meshram and V. D. Patil, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 1117 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) M. J. Maritinelli, R. Vaidyanthan, J. M. Pawlak, N. K. Nayyar, U. P. Dhokte, C. W. Doecke, L. M. H. Zollars, E. D. Moher, V. V. Khau and B. Košmrlj, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 3578 CrossRef PubMed;
(b) M. J. Martinelli, N. K. Nayyar, E. D. Moher, U. P. Dhokte, J. M. Pawlak and R. Vaidyanathan, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 447 CrossRef CAS;
(c) K. Yuasa, K. Enomoto, Y. Maekawa, J. Kato, T. Yamashita and M. Yoshida, J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol., 2004, 17, 21 CrossRef CAS;
(d) Z. Quan, F. Jing, Z. Zhang, Y. Da and X. Wang, Chin. J. Chem., 2013, 31, 1495 CrossRef CAS.
- For selected examples on various sulfonyl sources, see:
(a) W. Wei, C. Li, D. Yang, J. Wen, J. You, Y. Suo and H. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 10239 RSC;
(b) X. Li, Y. Xu, W. Wu, C. Jiamg, C. Qi and H. Jiang, Chem.–Eur. J., 2014, 20, 7911 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) X. Zhao, E. Dimitrijević and V. M. Dong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3466 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) Z. Wu, H. Song, X. Cui, C. Pi, W. Du and Y. Wu, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 1270 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(e) H. Li and G. Liu, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 509 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- For selected examples, see:
(a) F. Xiao, S. Chen, Y. Chen, H. Huang and G. Deng, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 652 RSC;
(b) Q. Jiang, B. Xu, A. Zhao, Y. Zhao, Y. Li, N. He and C. Guo, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 7372 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) Y. Gao, W. Wu, Y. Huang, K. Huang and H. Jiang, Org. Chem. Front., 2014, 1, 361 RSC;
(d) Y. Xu, X. Tang, W. Hu, W. Wu and H. Jiang, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 3720 RSC;
(e) X. Tang, L. Huang, Y. Xu, J. Yang, W. Wu and H. Jiang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 4205 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(f) X. Tang, L. Huang, C. Qi, X. Wu, W. Wu and H. Jiang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6102 RSC.
-
(a) J. Aziz, S. Messaoudi, M. Alami and A. Hamze, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 9743 RSC;
(b) B. Rao, W. Zhang, L. Hu and M. Luo, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 3436 RSC;
(c) D. H. Ortgies, F. Chen and P. Forgione, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2014, 3917 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) P. Katrun, S. Hongthong, S. Hlekhlai, M. Pohmakotr, V. Reutrakul, D. Soorukram, T. Jaipetch and C. Kuhakarn, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 18933 RSC;
(b) S. Liu, L. Tang, H. Chen, F. Zhao and G. Deng, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 6076 RSC.
-
(a) H. Togo and S. Iida, Synlett, 2006, 2159 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) S. Das, R. Borah, R. R. Devi and A. J. Thakur, Synlett, 2008, 2741 CAS;
(c) B. Alcaide, P. Almendros, G. Cabrero, R. Callejo, M. P. Ruiz, M. Arnó and L. R. Domingo, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 1688 CrossRef CAS;
(d) C. Chen, S. Yang and M. Wu, J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 10269 CrossRef CAS;
(e) K. Xu, Y. Hu, S. Zhang, Z. Zha and Z. Wang, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 9793 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(f) U. T. Sunil, S. K. Sushma, A. D. Satish, R. S. Swapnil and P. P. Rajendra, Curr. Org. Chem., 2012, 16, 1485 CrossRef;
(g) P. T. Parvatkar, P. S. Parameswaran and S. G. Tilve, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 5460 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(h) W. Lee, H. Shen, W. Hu, W. Lo, C. Murali, J. K. Vandavasi and J. Wang, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2012, 354, 2218 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) K. Seth, S. R. Roy, B. V. Pipaliya and A. K. Chakraborti, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 5886 RSC;
(b) B. Alcaide, P. Almendros, M. T. Quirós, R. López, M. I. Menéndez and A. S. Ćwikla, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 898 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) J. Hu, E. A. Adogla, Y. Ju, D. Fan and Q. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 11256 RSC;
(d) Z. Wu, F. Luo, S. Chen, Z. Li, H. Xiang and X. Zhou, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7653 RSC;
(e) W. Sun, H. Lin, W. Zhou and Z. Li, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 7491 RSC;
(f) Y. E. Lee, T. Cao, C. Torruellas and M. C. Kozlowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 6782 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(g) W. Chen, J. Li, D. Fang, C. Feng and C. Zhang, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4565 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(h) D. Lee, K. Kwon and C. S. Yi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 7325 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) X. Gao, X. Pan, J. Gao, H. Huang, G. Yuan and Y. Li, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 210 RSC;
(b) G. Yuan, Z. Chen, X. Gao and H. Jiang, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 24300 RSC;
(c) H. Huang, G. Yuan, X. Li and H. Jiang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2013, 54, 7165 Search PubMed;
(d) X. Pan, J. Gao, J. Liu, J. Lai, H. Jiang and G. Yuan, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 1400 RSC.
-
(a) H. C. Bell, J. T. Pinhey and S. Sternhell, Aust. J. Chem., 1979, 32, 1551 CrossRef CAS;
(b) J. T. Pinhey, Aust. J. Chem., 1991, 44, 1353 CrossRef CAS;
(c) J. T. Pinhey, Pure Appl. Chem., 1996, 68, 819 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) W. E. Truce and G. C. Wolf, J. Org. Chem., 1971, 36, 1727 CrossRef CAS;
(b) P. Katrun, C. Mueangkaew, M. Pohmakotr, V. Reutrakul, T. Jaipetch, D. Soorukram and C. Kuhakarn, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 1778 CrossRef CAS;
(c) E. Truce, D. L. Heuring and G. C. Wolf, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 406 CrossRef;
(d) L. M. Harwood, M. Julia and G. L. Thuiller, Tetrahedron, 1980, 36, 2483 CrossRef CAS;
(e) D. C. Craig, G. L. Edwards and C. A. Muldoon, Synlett, 1977, 1441 Search PubMed;
(f) J. Barluenga, J. M. Martínez-Gallo, C. Nájera, M. Yus and F. J. Fananas, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1987, 2605 RSC;
(g) C. Nájera, B. Baldó and M. Yus, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1988, 1029 RSC.
-
(a) M. T. Baumgartner, G. A. Blanco and A. B. Pierini, New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 464 RSC;
(b) J. M. Savéant, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 3716 CrossRef.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed experimental procedures, characterization of products, and NMR spectral charts. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra00724k |
|
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.