Open Access Article
André Silva dos Reisa,
Alberdan Silva Santos
*a and
José Francisco de Carvalho Gonçalvesb
aLaboratory of Systematic Investigation in Biotechnology and Molecular Biodiversity, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém, PA 66075-110, Brazil. E-mail: alberdan@ufpa.br
bLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, National Institute of Amazonian Research (MCTI-INPA), Manaus, AM 69060-020, Brazil
First published on 8th October 2021
This study describes the optimized stages of lipid extraction assisted by ultrasound to increase the concentrations of limonoids and steroids from andiroba seeds, identified as Carapa guianensis Aublet, and the lipidome analyzed by TLC and GC/MS. After boiling and peeling, crushed seeds were subjected to extractions with n-hexane (G1), acetone (G2), and methanol (G3) in an ultrasonic bath for 30 minutes at 50 °C. These extracts were analyzed by analytical TLC; aliquots of each extract and a marketable oil, used as a reference, were transesterified followed by silylation with BSTFA + 1% TMCS, and analyzed by GC/MS. The reference oil and the biomass of the seeds did not present significant differences in the profiles of free fatty acids (FFA). However, differences were observed in the profiles of tetranortriterpenoids (TnTT) (limonoids) in the seeds. Afterward, the analysis of the extracts G1, G2, and G3 detected free steroids: campesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol; and limonoids: 7-deacetyl-7-oxogedunin, 6α-acetoxy-gedunin, deacetylgedunin, and epoxyacetylgedunin. The use of lipidomic techniques associated with ultrasound-assisted extraction was applied for the first time to enhance the triterpenoids and steroids, mainly in G3, describing a faster and more economical process, and allowing a one-step lipidome analysis of the andiroba seeds.
Over the last few decades, studies have intensified mainly to confirm new biological activities with andiroba oil, which demonstrates the importance of this species for biodiesel production as an alternative fuel for isolated communities from the Amazon Forest for the generation of electric energy by generators.9 The oil extracted by mechanical pressing supplies the insecticidal,10–12 pharmaceutical,1 and cosmetics13 industries in the production of soap, shampoo, and body oils on an industrial scale.14 In the medicinal uses, the fractions oil enriched with gedunin, a limonoid present in andiroba oil, was reported to combat the inflammatory disease caused by the action of T lymphocytes during an allergic reaction.15
The process of industrial extraction of the oil guarantees a 30% yield by the double pressing of the crushed seeds with 8% moisture.16 Usually, andiroba oil is extracted in two ways: by cooking followed by maceration and heating in the sun to release the oil; this method is widely used by traditional communities. Another method is to press the seeds in nature employing hydraulic presses.17
In general, several studies relate the profiles of fatty acids present in andiroba oil and others describe the presence of triterpenoids, classified as limonoids.18–21 However, until now, no study has shown systematic lipidic research on andiroba seeds targeting the lipid profile of the metabolites present in those seeds, mainly tetranorterpenoids and steroids, who are referenced for presenting relevant biological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, and other factors that may be associated with the development of the disease.7,8,22,23 In this aspect, this study applied lipidomic techniques to analyze steroids and tetranorterpenoids as well as other lipids, adopting ultrasonic-assisted extraction associated with apolar, polar, and polar medium to obtain all the lipids present in the seeds of C. guianensis. Since lipid-assisted extraction of steroids and tetranortriterpenoids has been used in other vegetable species to obtain lipid classes very efficiently,24,25 it has not yet been applied for the analysis of the seeds of Carapa guianensis Aubl.
In this study, the application of the techniques of ultrasound-assisted extraction with concentrated limonoids and steroids and other lipids, and the lipidomic applied to the oil and seeds of C. guianensis were shown to be highly efficient. It describes faster extraction, time and solvent savings, as well as the use of a small amount of the samples, which are promising methodologies for future lipids extractions and analysis.
987 ′and longitude west: 60° 02
238′ by collaborators from INPA (National Research Institute of the Amazon). The seeds were kept frozen at −20 °C until processed. The SisGen authorization was numbered: AF60078.
:
2
:
2 (v/v) and two drops of acetic acid. The method to exposed TLC plate followed the Magrini's method28 with adaptation, which a solution of sulfuric vanillin as the developer was used: solution A [(10% vanillin in ethanol (m/v)] and solution B [(10% sulfuric acid in ethanol (v/v)] at the ratio of 1
:
1 (v/v) for detections of the metabolic classes.
000 RPM; the organic phase of each sample was transferred to new tubes (TBx-2). A volume of 110 μL of 2 N HCl was added to each tube (TBx-1) of each sample, shaking manually for 10 seconds. Thereafter, 200 μL of the CH2Cl2
:
n-hexane mixture was added in a ratio of 1
:
1 (v/v), stirred again for 10 seconds, 1 mL of deionized water was added to remove the excess acid from the organic phase, centrifuged under the same conditions as before. The supernatant from each solution was transferred to its respective tube (TBx-2) and the samples were concentrated with the inert gas flow at (35 °C/5 psi/20 min). The concentrated samples were sent for derivatization with BSTFA + 1% TMCS and subsequent GC/MS analysis.
:
CH2Cl2 in the proportion of 1
:
1 (v/v) were added to the tubes (TBx-2) respectively, 10 seconds, and the contents transferred into 2 mL glass flasks with lid and septum and analyzed by GC/MS.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 The flowchart representing the process steps to obtain the chemical profiles of the oil and the andiroba seeds. | ||
The transesterification reaction in the experimental condition allowed the release of the fatty acids that constituted the triglyceride molecules (TAG), making possible the detection of these compounds in the form of methyl esters, not interfering in the composition of the triterpenoids and steroids. It was observed that in the retention time of 9.7 minutes, in both analyses, the compound propanetriol-3TMS also known as glycerol trimethylsilated, a byproduct generated in the transesterification of TAG, DAG, and/or MAG, was detected, confirming that the transesterification reactions in the oil and seed were efficient, also denoting efficient derivatization.
The chemical profiles of oil and seeds samples have three main classes of metabolites: fatty acids, steroids, and triterpenoids; in parallel, glycerol, squalene (a polyunsaturated hydrocarbon of the triterpene type) and unidentified substances can also be observed. It is noteworthy that the relevance of this analysis is based on identifying all free substances containing hydroxyl group, consistent with the presence of free fatty acids that characterize the acidity of the oil, being palmitic (11.70%) and oleic (15.01%) acids the responsible for this characteristic; and with the other steroidal or triterpenoid molecules favoring their volatilizations and, that can be observed by their derivatizations, presenting the TMS group linked to their structures (Table 1).
| N | Compounds | RT | KI | INO (%) | Sd± | ABM(%) | Sd± |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a TMS: trimethylsylil, RT: retention time, KI: Kovat's retention index calculated on DB-5 MS capillary column using homologous series of n-alkanes, (%) compound abundance in the sample, INO: in natura oil, ABM: andiroba biomass, Bdca = 1,2-benzenedicarboxilic acid 2TMS, Sd = standard deviation, NI = not identified. | |||||||
| 1 | Glycerol 3TMS | 9.71 | 1108 | 1.50 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 2,3-Ditert-butylphenol 1TMS | 13.17 | 1241 | — | 0.20 | 0.01 | |
| 3 | Miristic acid 1TMS | 17.74 | 1456 | — | 0.35 | 0.02 | |
| 4 | Methyl palmitoleate | 18.47 | 1494 | 2.13 | 0.09 | 0.70 | 0.03 |
| 5 | Methyl palmitate | 18.81 | 1512 | 17.26 | 0.85 | 16.03 | 0.69 |
| 6 | Palmitoleic acid 1TMS | 19.80 | 1566 | — | 0.71 | 0.04 | |
| 7 | Palmitic acid 1TMS | 20.17 | 1588 | 11.70 | 0.59 | 11.50 | 0.67 |
| 8 | Methyl oleate | 20.83 | 1626 | 30.80 | 1.61 | 25.80 | 1.28 |
| 9 | Methyl estearate | 21.00 | 1635 | 10.46 | 0.44 | 7.80 | 0.39 |
| 10 | Oleic acid1TMS | 21.87 | 1687 | 15.01 | 0.76 | 20.42 | 1.01 |
| 11 | Stearic acid 1TMS | 22.06 | 1699 | 3.98 | 0.17 | 6.20 | 0.31 |
| 12 | Methyl 11-eicosenoate | 22.47 | 1724 | — | 0.31 | 0.02 | |
| 13 | Methyl araquidoate | 22.52 | 1727 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 2.40 | 0.12 |
| 14 | Methyl araquidonate | 22.77 | 1742 | 2.60 | 0.15 | — | — |
| 15 | Adipic acid 2TMS | 23.29 | 1775 | — | 0.66 | 0.03 | |
| 16 | Araquidic acid 1TMS | 23.77 | 1806 | — | 0.80 | 0.04 | |
| 17 | Methyl behenoate | 24.38 | 1846 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.64 | 0.03 |
| 18 | Bdca – 2TMS | 24.48 | 1852 | — | 0.95 | 0.05 | |
| 19 | Malic acid 2TMS | 24.75 | 1870 | — | 0.39 | 0.02 | |
| 20 | Behenic acid 1TMS | 25.16 | 1897 | — | 0.11 | 0.01 | |
| 21 | Methyl lignocerate | 25.85 | 1945 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.45 | 0.02 |
| 22 | Squalene | 26.48 | 1989 | — | 0.22 | 0.03 | |
| 23 | Stigmasterol 1TMS | 29.70 | 2226 | — | 0.11 | 0.01 | |
| 24 | β-Sitosterol 1TMS | 30.28 | 2293 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.01 |
| 25 | N.I. | 30.84 | 2395 | — | 1.80 | 0.09 | |
| 26 | N.I. | 32.38 | 2664 | — | 0.14 | 0.01 | |
| 27 | N.I. | 32.81 | 2738 | — | 0.31 | 0.02 | |
| 28 | 7-Deacetoxy-7-oxogedunin | 34.08 | 2953 | — | 0.35 | 0.02 | |
The methyl esters characterize the fatty acids that were in the form of acylglycerols, that is, that were linked to the glycerol, showing the level of oil integrity in the matrix. In this study, it is observed that in seeds, a higher level of substances that were bound to the cell wall was detected and that was released by hydrolysis, which can be derivatized and/or detected. In this case, the applied methodologies are efficient in the extraction and detection of substances that, generally, are bound in the walls or the cell membranes. It is observed that the levels of detection of substances were higher in seeds than in oil. This is because during the extractions, the seeds are pressed or a liquid–solid extraction is done using mechanical, magnetic, sound, or percolation systems. In this case, the results show greater visibility of the chemical profile of these seeds; this is due to the presence of limonoids, which are substances of great importance in this species, due to their biological activities. Besides that, it can be seen that steroids are detected on a wider spectrum than in oil. Some of the substances present in these chemical profiles could not be identified, but their mass fragments are described (Table 2).
| Samples | RT | m/z |
|---|---|---|
| a INO: in natura oil, ABM: andiroba biomass, RT: retention time, m/z: mass fragments. | ||
| ABM | 30.84 | 57(100), 91(12), 131(8), 147(45), 191(10), 237(10), 308(11), 329(2), 385(2), 441(98), 442(38), 443(5), 631(1), 646(5), 662(1) |
| 32.38 | 43(39), 55(25), 59(10), 67(22), 70(47), 91(72), 95(80), 105(100), 121(62), 137(30), 148(42), 164(25), 210(15), 243(10), 257(62), 331(10), 359(15), 470(40), 497(1) | |
| 32.81 | 57(100), 91(11), 147(15), 175(5), 191(20), 253(5), 291(5), 391(30), 367(2), 443(1), 535(2), 591(3), 647(35), 648(20), 662(18), 664(3) | |
In a resumed way the analysis of the lipid profile of the cooked seed andiroba biomass (SAB) by GC/MS appears as an efficient application of the lipidomic technique to detect compounds that are not concentrated in the oil by press extraction. These results describe the possibility of concentrating the limonoids and steroids in the in natura oil.
Previous analysis of the crude oil and that hydrolyzed by enzyme describe identity fatty acids profile Salgado et al.19 very similar to the profile found in this study, however, only fatty acids were detected by means of GC/MS, which may be related to the process of extraction of lipids, which compared to the study in question, it was possible to detect steroids and tetranortriterpenoids obtained by ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction.
The values of the oleic acid concentration present high concentration value confirm that andiroba seed is an important source of this compound.31–33 Experimental evidence demonstrates in vitro and ex vivo, the ability of oleic acid to accelerate the healing process through supplementation, and this fact associated with the presence of this substance in high concentrations in andiroba oil may be related to the healing effect.34 Although the biological potential of this oil is as an anti-inflammatory, which is associated with the limonoids compounds7,14,35 in this case, the synergic action could act, once minimizing the inflammation acting in favor of the healing.
Another important detection verified in the analysis of the biomass of the seeds was the non-major metabolic classes known as steroid and limonoids, which for the first time techniques of lipidomics was applied directly in the seeds, innovating a different type of study had not yet developed in the seeds of C. guianensis allowing the detection of all tetranortriterpenoids. It is important to stands out that most of the studies carried out to obtain this class of compound directly from the oil and use a large quantity of oil to obtain the minimum amount.11,22,33,36–38 The technological aim is to obtain concentrated fraction containing the steroids stigmasterol and β-sitosterol and other concentrated fraction containing the tetranortriterpenoides. In this case, the 7-deacetoxy-7-oxogedunin and the steroids found in the biomass analysis, as well as the other limonoids, are substances of pharmacological interest, mainly because they act synergistically demonstrating anti-allergic effects and the ability to inhibit eosinophil migration, as well as the activation of T lymphocytes8 and their predominant properties action against the inflammatory process.9,39–41
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 Flowchart of the process of obtaining the different extracts and the analysis of the lipidic profile of the Carapa guianensis' seeds. | ||
The G1, G2, and G3 extracts were analyzed by TLC to investigate the profiles of the lipid metabolic classes present, using a chemical developer sulfuric vanillin (SV), allowing the detection and confirmation of the presence of triglycerides (monoacyl, diacyl, and triacylglycerols), phospholipids, free fatty acids, steroids and tetranortriterpenoids in seeds. The separations followed the methodology described by Ganstone, Harwood, and Dijkstra42 for lipids using TLC analytical techniques, where phospholipids, due to their polarity, are at the base. Detections of the steroid and triterpenoid bands were based on the appearance of violet color after staining the bands with (SV), according to Kavoc-Besovic et al.,26 Fig. 3.
These metabolic profiles of the extracts (G1), (G2) and (G3) show notably differences, especially related to the limonoids and steroids compounds, being evident in the extracts G2 and G3, which showed an increment concentration of steroids campesterol (G3), stigmasterol, β-sitosterol (G1/G3) and tetranortriterpenoids: 7-desacetoxy-7-oxogedunin (G2), deacetylgedunin (G1/G2), gedunin (G1/G3), 6α-acetoxygedunin (G2/G3), and epoxydeacetylgedunin (G2), Table 3.
| N | Compounds | RT | KI | G1% | Sd1 ± | G2% | Sd2 ± | G3% | Sd3 ± |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a TMS: trimethylsilyl, RT: retention time, (%) compound abundance in the sample, KI: Kovat'sretention index calculated on DB-5 MS capillary column using homologous series of n-alkanes, Sd = standard deviation, G1: hexane extract, G2: acetone extract, G3: methanol extract, NI: compound not identified. | |||||||||
| 1 | Glycerol 3TMS | 9.77 | 1110 | 1.15 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.01 | — | — |
| 2 | N.I. | 15.39 | 1340 | 0.14 | 0.01 | — | 0.45 | 0.02 | |
| 3 | Methyl miristate | 15.75 | 1356 | 0.11 | 0.00 | — | — | — | |
| 4 | Miristic acid 1TMS | 17.59 | 1448 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.01 |
| 5 | Methyl palmitoleate | 18.33 | 1487 | 0.60 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.01 |
| 6 | Methyl palmitate | 18.79 | 1511 | 12.7 | 0.63 | 11.9 | 0.67 | 12.8 | 0.54 |
| 7 | Palmitoleic acid 1TMS | 20.06 | 1581 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 1.01 | 0.06 | 0.61 | 0.03 |
| 8 | Palmitic acid 1TMS | 20.52 | 1608 | 16.8 | 0.75 | 15.8 | 0.89 | 15.2 | 0.65 |
| 9 | Methyl oleate | 20.78 | 1623 | 26.4 | 1.26 | 24.9 | 1.41 | 29.8 | 1.26 |
| 10 | Methyl stearate | 21.27 | 1651 | 4.90 | 0.21 | 4.80 | 0.27 | 3.80 | 0.16 |
| 11 | Oleic acid 1TMS | 22.16 | 1705 | 25.8 | 1.09 | 28.9 | 1.63 | 26.7 | 1.13 |
| 12 | Stearic acid 1TMS | 22.40 | 1720 | 4.80 | 0.20 | 5.50 | 0.31 | 5.00 | 0.21 |
| 13 | Methyl hexadecanoate, 9.10-(Z)-methylene- | 22.70 | 1738 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.01 | — | — |
| 14 | Methyl arachidonate | 22.88 | 1749 | 1.55 | 0.08 | 1.14 | 0.06 | 0.71 | 0.03 |
| 15 | Suberic acid 2TMS | 23.35 | 1779 | 0.53 | 0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | Arachidic acid 1TMS | 23.79 | 1807 | 1.41 | 0.06 | 0.40 | 0.02 | — | — |
| 17 | Methyl behenoate | 24.18 | 1832 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.01 |
| 18 | Albuterol | 24.54 | 1856 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 0.04 |
| 19 | Methyl lignocerate | 25.33 | 1909 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.01 |
| 20 | Campesterol 1TMS | 28.72 | 2151 | — | — | — | — | 0.12 | 0.01 |
| 21 | β-Sitosterol 1TMS | 30.15 | 2282 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.01 |
| 22 | N.I. | 30.19 | 2291 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.04 |
| 23 | 2,6-Di-tert-buthylphenol | 32.41 | 2669 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.01 |
| 24 | Gedunin | 33.70 | 2889 | 0.09 | 0.00 | — | 5.71 | 0.58 | 0.02 |
| 25 | 7-Deacetoxy-7-oxogedunin | 34.01 | 2941 | — | — | 1.25 | 0.07 | — | — |
| 26 | Calystegine B2 4TMS | 34.27 | 2984 | 0.07 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | Deacetylgedunin | 34.52 | 3025 | 0.81 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.01 |
| 28 | 6α-Acetoxygedunin | 34.73 | 3059 | — | — | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.01 |
| 29 | N.I. | 34.91 | 3090 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.01 |
| 30 | N.I. | 35.47 | 3180 | — | 0.05 | 0.32 | 0.02 | — | — |
| 31 | Epoxideacetylgedunin | 36.15 | 3289 | — | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.01 |
Initially, it seems that the solvents do not present relevant extractions influence, although when pyridine was used to improve the methanol extraction its influences in the derivatization of all polar molecules present in the G3-P (methanolic extract with pyridine) extract, including sugars, and micro phenolic molecules, Table 4. This addition takes out all limonoids and steroids present but also takes out all molecules not desired like sugars and phenolic acids hydrolyzed from cell walls or that are present in the growth cell as described by Lima et al.43 and Moraes et al.44 The detection and analysis of these polar molecules may be related to the solubility of these substances in solvents of medium and high polarity and associated with the exposure of the ultrasonic bath that turns polar molecules more easily extracted. Some compounds could not be identified due to the lack of mass spectrum pattern. Table 5 is composed of the mass fragments of the unidentified substances and presents their respective retention times, which may help in future identification.
| Extracts | RT | m/z |
|---|---|---|
| a G1: hexane extract, G2: acetone extract, G3: methanol extract, RT: retention time, m/z: mass fragments. | ||
| G2 | 35.47 | 43(22), 73(100), 95(45), 105(12), 161(12), 201(5), 225(5), 402(1), 403(17), 404(5), 495(1) |
| G1 and G3 | 15.39 | 57(48), 82(10), 97(100), 99(20), 137(10), 180(8), 193(2), 235(2), 292(1) |
| G1, G2 and G3 | 30.19 | 57(100), 91(10), 147(30), 191(5), 237(5), 308(6), 385(1), 441(20), 444(2), 646(1) |
| 34.91 | 43(15), 73(100), 95(30), 121(20), 149(12), 157(72), 237(5), 279(3), 297(10), 315(6), 387(18), 388(5) | |
| N | Compounds | RT | KI | G3-P (%) | Sd ± |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a TMS: trimethylsilyl, RT: retention time, KI: Kovat's retention index calculated on the DB-5 MS capillary column using homologous series of n-alkanes, Sd = standard deviation, (%) compound abundance in the sample. | |||||
| 1 | Tiglic acid 1TMS | 5.6 | 925 | 1.20 | 0.06 |
| 2 | 3-Heptanol 1TMS | 5.95 | 939 | 1.02 | 0.05 |
| 3 | Benzoic acid 1TMS | 9.12 | 1069 | 0.95 | 0.02 |
| 4 | Glycerol 3TMS | 9.74 | 1109 | 0.66 | 0.03 |
| 5 | Butanedioic acid 2TMS | 10.34 | 1130 | 0.41 | 0.02 |
| 6 | N.I. | 15.86 | 1362 | 0.86 | 0.04 |
| 7 | N.I. | 16.21 | 1379 | 1.10 | 0.05 |
| 8 | Xylitol 5TMS | 16.6 | 1398 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| 9 | D-fructose 5TMS | 17.69 | 1453 | 1.76 | 0.09 |
| 10 | Palmitato de metila | 18.74 | 1508 | 4.45 | 0.18 |
| 11 | D-Glucitol 6TMS | 19.28 | 1538 | 0.43 | 0.02 |
| 12 | D-glicose 5TMS | 19.89 | 1572 | 1.85 | 0.09 |
| 13 | Palmiticacid 1TMS | 20.21 | 1590 | 16.8 | 0.63 |
| 14 | Methyloleate | 20.71 | 1618 | 8.13 | 0.40 |
| 15 | Methyl stearate | 20.97 | 1634 | 0.72 | 0.04 |
| 16 | Oleic acid 1TMS | 21.95 | 1692 | 28.4 | 1.21 |
| 17 | Stearic acid 1TMS | 22.15 | 1704 | 5.90 | 0.23 |
| 18 | Arachidic acid 1TMS | 23.49 | 1811 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| 19 | Suberic acid 2TMS | 24.66 | 1864 | 1.02 | 0.05 |
| 20 | Malic acid 3TMS | 24.96 | 1884 | 1.14 | 0.06 |
| 21 | Campesterol 1TMS | 29.62 | 2220 | 0.22 | 0.01 |
| 22 | Stigmasterol 1TMS | 29.83 | 2236 | 0.17 | 0.01 |
| 23 | β-Sitosterol 1TMS | 30.25 | 2288 | 0.61 | 0.03 |
| 24 | Gedunin | 33.65 | 2881 | 0.79 | 0.04 |
| 25 | 7-Deacetoxy-7-oxogedunin | 34.09 | 2954 | 2.53 | 0.13 |
| 26 | N.I. | 34.77 | 3066 | 1.40 | 0.07 |
| 27 | Desacetylgedunin | 35.14 | 3127 | 1.60 | 0.08 |
| 28 | 6α-Acetoxygedunin | 35.32 | 3156 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
| 29 | N.I. | 35.64 | 3207 | 6.27 | 0.25 |
| 31 | Epoxideactylgedunin | 36.23 | 3302 | 0.70 | 0.03 |
The tetranortriterpenoid detected in the analysis of the three extracts of andiroba seeds and identified by comparison of the CG/MS mass spectra library was desacetylgedunin (C26H32O6) 440.53 MW, 513 [M+]3 and (m/z 299.28). This was also found in another study,45 and in the analysis of the hexane extract of the seeds by GC/MS resulting in values of 440 MW and the base peak of 299 m/z confirm the presence of limonoids in fresh andiroba oil employing gas chromatography.18 Another study carried out19 when analyzing the andiroba oil profile by GC/MS, detected the presence of deacetylgeduninumine and epoxides acetylenedunine in the analyzed samples.19 The results obtained by Ferraris et al.15 using a fraction rich in gedunin in animals with induced allergic reactions, proves the efficiency of this substance in the non-activation of T lymphocytes during the inflammatory process caused by the allergic reaction, thus functioning as an excellent antiallergic (Table 6).
| RT | m/z |
|---|---|
| a RT: retention time, m/z: mass fragments. | |
| 15.86 | 43(20), 57(55), 69(26), 83(18), 97(100), 111(8), 123(18), 137(10), 179(10), 193(2), 235(1) |
| 16.21 | 70(68), 73(35), 84(12), 130(10), 157(30), 158(12), 159(5), 242(100), 243(20), 244(5), 275(1), 330(5), 332(1) |
| 34.77 | 73(52), 75(8), 147(20), 157(75), 158(15), 159(5), 217(100), 231(70), 246(20), 275(10), 325(1), 414(1) |
| 35.64 | 73(10), 96(10), 135(10), 177(5), 191(15), 207(100), 208(25), 221(5), 253(15), 281(25), 282(5), 325(1), 341(2), 355(2), 405(1), 429(1) |
| 36.23 | 73(100), 95(50), 131(25), 149(15), 189(12), 213(10), 267(5), 313(8), 331(2), 403(40), 404(10), 419(5), 495(1) |
The steroid compounds detected and identified in the extracts are relevant for Amazonian vegetable oils Bataglion et al.,31 and that GC/MS analysis is not always successful in this type of identification, especially steroids and triterpenoids (limonoids). In this case, it is observed that the presence of the campesterol identified in the extract (G3), shows that the method used was efficient in the identification of this class of metabolite and that the highest or lowest quality of the analysis may be related, mainly to the treatment of the samples.
The ultrasonic-assisted extraction method demonstrates to be efficient for all classes of lipids present in the andiroba seed matrix, concentrating steroids, mostly tetranortriterpenoids, by increasing the concentration of these substances in the extracts of the seeds.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |