Saurabh
Gupta
a,
Sandra
Stangebye
a,
Katherine
Jungjohann
b,
Brad
Boyce
b,
Ting
Zhu
a,
Josh
Kacher
a and
Olivier N.
Pierron
*a
aG.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405, USA
bSandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA. E-mail: olivier.pierron@me.gatech.edu
First published on 12th May 2021
Correction for ‘In situ TEM measurement of activation volume in ultrafine grained gold’ by Saurabh Gupta et al., Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 7146–7158, DOI: 10.1039/D0NR01874K.
![]() | (8) |
A base 10 logarithm was mistakenly employed in that equation, instead of the natural logarithm, resulting in the V* values shown in the original paper being lower by a factor of 2.3 compared to the correct values. The two figures below (Fig. 7(c) and (d)) show the corrected values. The logarithmic fit for eqn (5) was done correctly in the original paper, hence the apparent activation volumes, Va, are correct.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 In situ TEM repeated stress relaxations of a 100 nm-thick Au microspecimen. (c) and (d) corresponding V* versus stress and plastic strain, respectively. |
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |