Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Highly porous melamine-formaldehyde monoliths with controlled hierarchical porosity toward application as a metal scavenger

Yuki Nakanishi a, Yosuke Hara a, Riichi Miyamoto a, Kazuki Nakanishi bc and Kazuyoshi Kanamori *a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. E-mail: kanamori@kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp
bInstitute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan
cInstitute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

Received 15th January 2021 , Accepted 2nd March 2021

First published on 4th March 2021


Abstract

We report a new synthetic strategy for melamine-formaldehyde (MF) monoliths with controlled hierarchical porosity toward metal-ion scavengers. The obtained MF monoliths possessed micro-, meso- and macroporosity, which allowed efficient adsorption performance of precious metal ions in water. Applications such as recovery/removal of metal ions are expected.


Porous materials with discrete hierarchical porosity have been recognized as efficient materials for adsorption, separation, energy conversion/storage, sensing and catalysis.1–4 Various materials with micro-, meso- and macroporosity have been developed in different chemical compositions such as inorganics, organics and their hybrids in different material formats such as particles, films, and monoliths. Hierarchically porous monolithic materials are attractive among them, since they allow efficient mass transfer, which enhances the contact between the pore surface and guest fluid.5,6

One synthetic strategy for hierarchically porous monoliths is the sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation (spinodal decomposition).7 This strategy was originated from the silica sol–gel system, and later extended to sol–gel systems of a variety of inorganic oxides/hydroxides, organic–inorganic hybrids and organic crosslinked polymers. In the last systems, a series of hierarchically porous polymer monoliths and carbon derivatives has been prepared via controlled/living radical polymerization of divinylbenzene and other vinyl monomers/crosslinkers accompanied by phase separation. Poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) monoliths8,9 have been found to successfully separate small molecules such as alkylbenzenes under a low back pressure.10 On the other hand, sol–gel systems based on living polymerization often require expensive reagents and an inert atmosphere. The family of phenolic/melamine resin is another important platform toward porous materials through liquid phase processes based on the addition–condensation mechanism. These resins can be prepared with low-cost reagents under ambient conditions. Aerogels and related porous monoliths based on the phenolic resin family, first reported by Pekala11 on resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF), have been attracting researchers to obtain carbonized materials with hierarchical micro- and meso- or macroporosity particularly for energy applications.12 By tuning miscibility between the phenolic resin-based network and solvent using micelle-forming surfactant, some researchers have reported hierarchically porous phenolic resin monoliths via the sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation.13,14 On the other hand, focusing on another important resin system, melamine-formaldehyde (MF), it is still challenging to control hierarchical porosity. The phase separation process in phenolic resin networks is based on the immiscibility between the rather hydrophobic phenolic resin network and hydrophilic water-based solvent. It is therefore difficult to expand the synthetic strategy for hydrophobic phenolic resin gels to the system of much less hydrophobic MF network-based gels.

The MF network, developing through dehydrative polycondensation between methylol groups and methylol/amino groups, possesses triazine rings and amino groups in the network (Fig. S1, ESI). The triazine rings and amino groups are known to form complexes with metal cation species such as [PdCl4]2− through coordination and ionic interaction.15,16 Hierarchically porous MF materials are thus attractive for metal scavengers that can efficiently recover precious metal ions or remove toxic metal ions.

In the present research, we have for the first time developed a hierarchically porous monolith based on MF from a single oligomeric precursor methylolmelamine via a simple sol–gel process, solvothermal treatment, and removing additives by a solvent exchange process (Fig. 1).


image file: d1ma00034a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Schematic of the synthesis of the hierarchically porous MF monoliths with controlled multimodal porosity. (i) Phase separation and sol–gel transition. (ii) Washing and hydrothermal treatment to form meso-/microporous structures, which imparts high specific surface area.

The suitable starting compositions and reaction conditions for monolithic MF gels with hierarchical porosity have been successfully specified. In a typical run, wPEO mg of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO, Mv ∼100[thin space (1/6-em)]000 or 200[thin space (1/6-em)]000) was dissolved in 6.0 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and then 0.70 g of methylolmelamine was dissolved, followed by an addition of 0.10 mL of 60 wt% nitric acid. After gelation and aging at 40 °C and 60 °C, the obtained monolithic gel underwent hydrothermal aging at 120 °C for 24 h, washing by solvent exchange, and finally drying from n-hexane. We employed DMF, not water, as the main solvent because methylomelamine is highly soluble in DMF and a heterogeneous network tends to form in water.17 In addition, we used a small amount of 60 wt% nitric acid as a reaction catalyst. Under these conditions, it was allowed to form transparent gels with high enough homogeneity specifically in the absence of phase separation inducer, PEO. In the presence of PEO, polymerization-induced phase separation took place in the course of sol–gel transition due to the increased degree of polymerization of MF. The transient morphology of phase separation was then solidified by gelation of the MF network, which turned into the macroporous morphology after removing all of the fluidic components from the wet gel. Details of the experimental procedure are given in the ESI.

Fig. 2 shows the morphologies observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) in the micrometer scale of the samples obtained from the starting compositions with different molecular weight and amounts of PEO as listed in Table S1 (ESI). No distinct macropores are found in the sample MF1 (Fig. 2A), which was prepared in the presence of PEO with lower molecular weight and a smaller amount, and macroporous morphologies are found in those prepared in the presence of PEO with higher molecular weight and larger amounts (Fig. 2B–E). The samples MF3, MF4 and MF5 show a well-defined interconnected structure derived from polymerization-induced spinodal decomposition. The thermodynamic instability of this quasi two-phase system composed of MF and PEO is increased with an increasing degree of polymerization (DP) of MF, and the more coarsened structures were obtained with higher DP and volume fraction of PEO, as predicted by the Flory–Huggins theory.18 These porous MF materials were obtained as colorless monoliths (Fig. 2F) with high enough mechanical stability for handling and applications.


image file: d1ma00034a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (A–E) SEM images of the MF polymer monoliths: (A) MF1, (B) MF2, (C) MF3, (D) MF4, and (E) MF5. (F) Appearance of the MF polymer monoliths of MF3.

Mesoporous structures were found in the macropore skeletons of these samples, as confirmed by nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distributions (Fig. S3, ESI). The higher uptake in the relative pressure p/p° ∼0.8–1 in the samples MF1 and MF2 is due to the presence of small macropores, and similar mesopore size around 4 nm can be confirmed in all the other samples with distinct interconnected macroporous morphology, which evidences the hierarchical porosity in these samples (see also Fig. 3 for the sample MF3). It can be deduced that most PEO was successfully removed from the wet gel during the solvent exchange process, since the attractive interaction between MF and PEO is not strong and PEO has been readily removed during solvent exchange with distilled water and 2-propanol.


image file: d1ma00034a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (left) and BJH pore size distributions (right) on the MF monoliths hydrothermally treated at different temperatures: (A) as-dried MF3 and those treated at 60 °C and 80 °C, and (B) those treated at 100 °C, 120 °C and 140 °C.

In order to assess the controllability of the porous structure and extend the applicability, changes in the mesoporous structure were investigated through the hydrothermal treatment after gelation, aging and solvent exchange with distilled water on the sample MF3 (Table 1). Results of nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements shown in Fig. 3 confirm that the mesopore diameter and total pore volume were increased with increasing temperature of hydrothermal treatment. Gels treated at 60 °C and 80 °C underwent further crosslinking of the network, resulting in the increases of pore diameter and pore volume due to decreased shrinkage during drying. At increased temperatures, dissolution and reorganization of the network became significant, which is confirmed by decreased bulk density of the dried gels, and accordingly, pore diameter and pore volume are increased drastically. The mesopore size can be controlled in 4.3–28.1 nm by changing the temperature of hydrothermal treatment, and the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area shows maximum (421 m2 g−1) in the sample treated at 100 °C (MF3-100). The changes in mesoporosity in the skeletons were also observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as shown in Fig. 4. The original MF3 possesses micropores judging from the steep uptake in the low relative pressure region. Changes in the microporous structure in the hydrothermal treatment were estimated by the t-plot,19 in which the specific micropore surface area increased from 117 m2 g−1 in MF3 to 279 m2 g−1 in MF3-100. In addition, the macroporous structure did not change due to the hydrothermal treatment as confirmed by SEM as presented in Fig. S4 (ESI). The macro- and mesoporosity in the MF monoliths thus can be independently controlled through phase separation and hydrothermal treatment, respectively.

Table 1 Mesopore properties of the MF polymer monoliths hydrothermally treated at different temperatures
Sample T hydro /°C d meso /nm V p /cm3 g−1 S BET /m2 g−1
a Hydrothermal treatment temperature. b BJH modal mesopore diameter. c Total pore volume. d BET surface area.
MF3 4.3 0.16 173
MF3-60 60 4.9 0.20 210
MF3-80 80 5.5 0.33 296
MF3-100 100 8.2 0.75 421
MF3-120 120 18.5 1.73 416
MF3-140 140 28.1 1.86 240



image file: d1ma00034a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 TEM images of the MF polymer monoliths: (A) MF3 and (B) MF3-140.

Porous MF monoliths have also been reported based on different strategies such as microemulsion templating20,21 and molecular imprinting,22 while there have been no reports on hierarchical pore formation through spinodal decomposition, to the authors’ knowledge. A bimodal pore structure was obtained in the microemulsion approach;21 however, it is generally difficult to independently control the size and volume of pores in different length scales through the emulsion approach, during which random coalescence of emulsions may occur. In the present approach based on phase separation and hydrothermal aging, an independent control of macro- and mesopores with narrow size distributions is possible, since phase separation is thermodynamically driven by controlled polymerization of the monomer and mesopore formation depends on an equilibrium process of dissolution/reorganization of the network.

These MF gels showed durability in both acid and alkaline solutions, as well as organic solvents. On the treatments in 10% (∼2.7 mol L−1) hydrochloric acid, 6 mol L−1 of sodium hydroxide, and xylene at 60 °C for 24 h, the monolithic shapes were maintained without noticeable swelling or shrinkage. The pore volume and mesopore diameter of the treated MF3-100 samples were slightly decreased, while the BET surface area was virtually maintained as higher than 300 m2 g−1 (Table S2, ESI).

Since the MF network possesses coordination sites including nitrogen in the triazine rings and amino groups, application of the present MF monoliths to metal scavengers can be expected as mentioned above. To evaluate the functionality of the MF monolith, the adsorption performance of Pd2+ species (including chloro-palladate complexes) in an acidic solution was investigated. A granulated MF monolith was used to assess the adsorption performance in a simple manner, since the benefits of high mass transfer in the macropores in the monoliths are evident in the granulated form.23,24 In particular, granulated iron oxyhydroxide and oxide monoliths with a similar macroporous morphology to the present MF material showed higher adsorption efficiency of pollutants compared to non-macroporous iron oxyhydroxide adsorbent with the same meso-/microporous structures in a flow-through setup.23 Granulated particles of dried MF3-100 in the size range between 63 and 212 μm were shaken in 0.1 mol L−1 HCl solution with 100 mg L−1 of PdCl2. Aminopropyl-modified conventional silica particles with monomodal mesopores (∼6.5 nm) and BET surface area of ∼450 m2 g−1 (denoted as NH2-silica, details shown in the ESI) were employed for comparison. The concentrations of Pd2+ after shaking for 1 and 24 h measured by ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy are shown in Fig. 5a. The concentrations of Pd2+ treated with MF3-100 and NH2-silica were reduced from 100 mg L−1 to 14 and 59 mg L−1 in 1 h, and 9 and 51 mg L−1 in 24 h, respectively. Most Pd2+ were adsorbed on the gel within 1 h effectively. The adsorbed amounts of Pd2+ on MF3-100 and NH2-silica in 24 h were 91 and 49 mg g-gel−1 (0.86 and 0.46 mmol g−1), respectively. The Pd2+ concentrations were more effectively reduced in the case of MF3-100, showing higher adsorption capacity than NH2-silica, due to the abundant adsorption sites such as amino groups and triazine units in the network. Results of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) on the samples MF3-100 before and after adsorption of Pd2+ shown in Fig. S5 (ESI) suggest complex formations at least between nitrogen in the triazine rings and Pd2+ species.25 Since these granulated powders of MF3-100 have a discrete hierarchical pore structure consisting of macro- and mesopores in each particle, the improvement of the adsorption performance can be attributed to enhanced mass transfer and diffusion of the metal ions especially due to the macropores, compared to the conventional particles.26 The enhancement of mass transfer and diffusion and resultant improved accessibility to the pore surfaces have also been confirmed in different hierarchically porous materials.27–29


image file: d1ma00034a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) Concentrations of Pd2+ in the batch adsorption tests using granulated MF3-100 and aminopropyl-modified silica in 0.1 mol L−1 HCl with 100 mg L−1 Pd2+ for 1 and 24 h. (b) Change in the Pd2+ concentration with the total flowed volume in the flow adsorption test using granulated MF3-100.

Adsorption tests have also been performed in a flow system, in which granulated powders of MF3-100 were packed in a syringe and the test solution was pressurized to flow through the bed. A typical setup for this experiment is shown in Fig. S6 (ESI). Using a small column of the granulated particles of MF3-100 (packing size: 5.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length), the 100 mg L−1 of Pd2+ was reduced to less than 0.1 mg L−1 in a single treatment. The concentration of Pd2+ in the outlet was kept less than 0.1 mg L−1 during the flow treatment for at least 1 h at 1.0 mL min−1 (Fig. 5b). The total 70 mL of the Pd2+ solution at 100 mg L−1 was able to be treated to almost completely remove Pd2+ ions using only a small column. The MF monoliths were also shown to efficiently adsorb other metal ions such as Pt, Au and Ir, and the adsorbed metal species can be recovered simply by incineration; hazardous liquids such as aqua regia are not necessary for extraction. These results suggest that the hierarchically porous MF monoliths can be used as an efficient precious metal scavenger.

In summary, hierarchically porous monoliths composed of the MF network have been obtained through a sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation. Mesopore properties in the macropore skeletons can be independently controlled by the hydrothermal treatment of the wet gels. The resultant MF monoliths show high stability against acid, base and organic solvent, and high adsorption efficiency for removal/recovery of Pd2+. While MF is a well-known material, still there are new opportunities in tuning the pore characteristics for more efficient applications.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr Naoki Araki and Prof. Hiroshi Kitagawa (Kyoto University) for technical support with the TEM observations. Funding: this work was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (17K06015, for K. K.) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

  1. W. Xia, A. Mahmood, R. Zou and Q. Xu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 1837–1866 RSC .
  2. Q. Sun, Z. Dai, X. Meng and F.-S. Xiao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 6018–6034 RSC .
  3. X.-Y. Yang, L.-H. Chen, Y. Li, J. C. Rooke, C. Sanchez and B.-L. Su, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 481–558 RSC .
  4. H. Sun, J. Zhu, D. Baumann, L. Peng, Y. Xu, I. Shakir, Y. Huang and X. Duan, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2019, 4, 45–60 CrossRef .
  5. K. Nakanishi, J. Porous Mater., 1997, 4, 67–112 CrossRef CAS .
  6. K. Nakanishi and N. Tanaka, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 863–873 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  7. K. Nakanishi, K. Kanamori, Y. Tokudome, G. Hasegawa and Y. Zhu, Handbook of Solid State Chemistry: 4. Nano and Hybrid Materials, ed. Andreas Stein, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2017, pp. 195–241 Search PubMed .
  8. K. Kanamori, K. Nakanishi and T. Hanada, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 2407–2411 CrossRef CAS .
  9. G. Hasegawa, K. Kanamori, K. Nakanishi and T. Hanada, Carbon, 2010, 48, 1757–1766 CrossRef CAS .
  10. G. Hasegawa, K. Kanamori, N. Ishizuka and K. Nakanishi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 2343–2347 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  11. R. W. Pekala, J. Mater. Sci., 1989, 24, 3221–3227 CrossRef CAS .
  12. J. Biener, M. Stadermann, M. Suss, M. A. Worsley, M. M. Biener, K. A. Rose and T. F. Baumann, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 656–667 RSC .
  13. C. Liang and S. Dai, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 2115–2124 CrossRef CAS .
  14. G. Hasegawa, T. Shimizu, K. Kanamori, A. Maeno, H. Kaji and K. Nakanishi, Chem. Mater., 2017, 29, 2122–2134 CrossRef CAS .
  15. E. Birinci, M. Gülfen and A. O. Aydin, Hydrometallurgy, 2009, 95, 15–21 CrossRef CAS .
  16. M. X. Tan, Y. N. Sum, J. Y. Ying and Y. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3254–3259 RSC .
  17. Y. Nakanishi, Y. Hara, W. Sakuma, T. Saito, K. Nakanishi and K. Kanamori, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2020, 3, 49–54 CrossRef CAS .
  18. P. J. Flory, Principles of polymer chemistry, Cornell University Press, New York, 1953 Search PubMed .
  19. J. Rouquerol, F. Rouquerol and K. S. W. Sing, Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: principles, Methodology and Applications, Academic Press, London, 1999, pp. 222–224 Search PubMed .
  20. C. du Fresne von Hohenesche, D. F. Schmidt and V. Schädler, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 6124–6129 CrossRef .
  21. C. C. Egger, C. du Fresne, D. Schmidt, J. Yang and V. Schädler, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 2008, 48, 86–94 CrossRef CAS .
  22. M. Liu, T. M. Tran, A. A. A. Elhaj, S. B. Torsetnes, O. N. Jensen, B. Sellergren and K. Irgum, Anal. Chem., 2017, 89, 9491–9501 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  23. Y. Hara, K. Kanamori, K. Morisato, R. Miyamoto and K. Nakanishi, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 9041–9048 RSC .
  24. W. Smits, K. Nakanishi and G. Desmet, J. Chromatogr. A, 2016, 1429, 166–174 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  25. M. Maghami, F. Farzaneh, J. Simpson and A. Moazeni, Polyhedron, 2014, 73, 22–29 CrossRef CAS .
  26. G. Guiochon, J. Chromatogr. A, 2007, 1168, 101–168 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  27. S. Dutta, A. Bhaumik and K. C.-W. Wu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 3574–3592 RSC .
  28. M. A. Isaacs, N. Robinson, B. Barbero, L. J. Durndell, J. C. Manayil, C. M. A. Parlett, C. D’Agostino, K. Wilson and A. F. Lee, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 11814–11825 RSC .
  29. T. Yamada, T. Matsuo, A. Ogawa, T. Ichikawa, Y. Kobayashi, H. Masuda, R. Miyamoto, H. Bai, K. Meguro, Y. Sawama, Y. Monguchi and H. Sajiki, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2019, 23, 462–469 CrossRef CAS .

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed experimental procedure, nitrogen adsorption–desorption results of the samples without hydrothermal aging, SEM images of the hydrothermally treated samples, and results of the durability test in solvents are described in the ESI. See DOI: 10.1039/d1ma00034a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021