Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: The corrosion inhibition of stainless steel by ferrocene–polyoxometalate hybrid molecular materials – experimental and first principles studies

Sruthi G. a, Shakeela K. b, Shanmugam R. a and Ranga Rao G. *a
aDepartment of Chemistry and DST-IITM Solar Energy Harnessing Centre (DSEHC), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India. E-mail: grrao@iitm.ac.in; Fax: +91 44 2257 4202; Tel: +91 44 2257 4226
bDepartment of Chemistry, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Vandalur, Chennai 600048, India

Received 10th June 2021 , Accepted 10th June 2021

First published on 24th June 2021


Abstract

Correction for ‘The corrosion inhibition of stainless steel by ferrocene–polyoxometalate hybrid molecular materials – experimental and first principles studies’ by G. Sruthi et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 3329–3344, DOI: 10.1039/C9CP06284J.


The authors would like to make the changes described below to their published article. An updated version of the article itself with these changes incorporated is available as an additional supplementary information file alongside the original published article.

Correction on page 3331:

The following sentence on page 3331:

“The composition of 316 grade steel is Fe: 1%; C: <0.08%; Cr: 16–18%; Ni: 10–14%; Mo: 2–3%; Mn: <2%; Si: <1%; P: <0.045%; S: <0.03%, with a molecular weight of 20.376 g mol−1 and a density of 7.87 g cm−3 (ASTM F138).”

Should read as:

“The composition of 316 grade steel is Fe: 60–62%; C: <0.08%; Cr: 16–18%; Ni: 10–14%; Mo: 2–3%; Mn: <2%; Si: <1%; P: <0.045%; S: <0.03%, with a molecular weight of 56.0 g mol−1 and a density of 7.87 g cm−3 (ASTM F138).”

Please note that accordingly the corrosion rates are also corrected. However, the corrosion inhibition efficiencies of SS@FcPW and SS@FcPMo reported remain the same.

Corrected Figure 11(c) on page 3338:

 


image file: d1cp90126e-f11.tif
Fig. 11 Reproducibility tests with error bars [Fig. 11(c) is corrected, but the inset of Fig. 11(c) has no change].

Corrected Table on page 3339:

 

Table 1 Calculations from Tafel plots using Tafel extrapolation technique
Electrode Method E corr (V) i corr (μA cm−2) Corrosion inhibition (η) and corrosion rate β a (V dec−1) β c (V dec−1) R p (ohm cm2)
a Instr. From CH Instrument software. b Calc. From Tafel extrapolation method. mmy denotes millimeter per year (mm year−1).
Bare steel (SS) (316 grade) Instr.a −0.210 2.10 image file: d1cp90126e-t1.tif 0.125 −0.068 8804
Calc.b −0.210 1.77 image file: d1cp90126e-t2.tif 0.119 −0.053 8995
SS@ FcPW Instr. 0.0100 0.62 image file: d1cp90126e-t3.tif 0.102 −0.059 26[thin space (1/6-em)]222
image file: d1cp90126e-t4.tif
Calc. 0.0100 0.62 η = 64.9% 0.108 −0.059 26[thin space (1/6-em)]722
image file: d1cp90126e-t5.tif
SS@ FcPMo Instr. 0.0155 0.56 η = 68.3% 0.084 −0.088 33[thin space (1/6-em)]344
image file: d1cp90126e-t6.tif
Calc. 0.0155 0.46 η = 74.0% 0.112 −0.101 37[thin space (1/6-em)]194
image file: d1cp90126e-t7.tif


Correction on page 3340:

The following sentence on page 3340:

“The corrosion rates and corrosion inhibition efficiencies calculated from the Tafel extrapolation method are as follows: bare SS: 0.013 mmy; SS@FcPW: 0.009 mmy, 32%; and SS@FcPMo: 0.003 mmy, 71%.”

Should read as:

The corrosion rates and corrosion inhibition efficiencies calculated from the Tafel extrapolation method are as follows: bare SS: 0.036 mmy; SS@FcPW: 0.025 mmy, 32%; and SS@FcPMo: 0.011 mmy, 71%.

Correction on page 3342:

The sentence on page 3342:

“From the Pearson method, we can predict the number of electrons being transferred from the inhibitor molecule to the Fe(100) surface using the expression [Δn = (ϕFeχinhibitor)/2(ηFeηinhibitor)], where ϕFe is the work function of Fe(110) and ηFe = 0.[thin space (1/6-em)]74,75

Should read as:

From the Pearson method, we can predict the number of electrons being transferred from the inhibitor molecule to the Fe(110) surface using the expression [Δn = (ϕFeχinhibitor)/2(ηFeηinhibitor)], where ϕFe is the work function of Fe(110) which is 4.82 eV and ηFe = 0.[thin space (1/6-em)]74,75

Correction in Table 4 on page 3342:

Δn value of FcPW is 1.24 (instead of −0.22) and that of FcPMo is 1.42 (instead of −0.15).

Correction on page 3343:

The following sentence on page 3343:

“From the table, the Δn values of FcPW and FcPMo are −0.22 and −0.15, respectively. These negative values indicate that both the inhibitor molecules FcPW and FcPMo act as electron acceptors from the vacant d-orbital of Fe metal on the surface of the stainless steel plate. The electron-accepting nature of the hybrid molecules increases the adsorption of the inhibitor molecules on the metal surface, therefore inhibiting the corrosion mechanism.”

Should read as:

“From the table, the Δn values for FcPW and FcPMo are 1.24 and 1.42, respectively. These values indicate that the fraction of electrons is transferred from the inhibitor molecules FcPW and FcPMo to the vacant d-orbital of Fe metal on the surface of stainless steel plate. The fraction of electrons transferred in the case of SS@FcPMo is more than that of SS@FcPW. So, there is increased adsorption of the inhibitor molecule on the metal surface, and therefore enhanced corrosion inhibition of stainless steel in the case of SS@FcPMo.”

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © the Owner Societies 2021
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.